Sovereign citizen arguments that challenge judicial authority through claims about missing oaths of office or bonds are consistently rejected by courts, as judges have the legal authority to preside over proceedings and require defendants to follow standard court procedures, including filing motions and presenting evidence through proper legal channels.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
HE’S BACK! Multiple Judges Shut Down Sovereign Citizen in Court — Epic Pro Se Fail!!!Added:
Hey guys, welcome to today's video.
Today we've got a sovereign citizen in court that I've been keeping an eye on for a while, Leonard Blatt, and he's back in court again, still trying the same arguments that never seem to land.
So, with that said, let's jump right into it. Mr. Blatt?
Is that Is Mr. Blatt here?
Who's here for court? Then may as well call the next one. Thank you.
Yes, Mr. Blatt is here.
Oh, are you Winged Up TMRV?
See, I don't know what that is.
I don't either, but that's what you're identified for on the on the Zoom call.
A lot of people can put their name in there, so I know who I'm talking to.
Yours just says Wing Tech TMRV.
This is really the first time I've used Zoom. I'm not familiar with it.
>> Starting off with a lie never really helps her case, especially when other creators and I have already covered multiple hearings where you clearly joined via Zoom. Okay, well, can you activate your camera so I can see you?
I'm trying to. This is a new phone, so I'm not familiar with it.
Um I can't see anything where to activate the camera.
Well, go down in the lower left. There, now you've changed it. Now, did you do that? Yes, start my video.
>> On the lower left uh screen, you should have a little There, I think you're going to come on here in a second. Yeah, there you are.
You see me? I Hi there.
Okay, I don't see me, but uh I see you. And then did you mute it? No, no. No, I didn't mute it. Okay, so I need you to unmute, Mr. Blatt.
Click on your microphone.
Mr. Mr. Blatt, in the lower left corner, there's going to be a little silhouette of a microphone with a line through it.
You need to click on that. You I can't hear you until you do that.
I I can't hear you. You need to You've muted your microphone. You need to unmute it.
Okay, can you hear me now?
Yes. I'd like to be able do both, hear you and see you.
Can you see me? Can you hear me? I cannot hear you I can see hear you but I cannot see you.
[ __ ] I heard that.
>> [laughter] >> Sorry.
There you are.
Okay, can you hear me?
I can. Can you hear me?
Yes.
Perfect and I can see you so don't change a thing. All right, I won't touch it. So there's a motion on the calendar here. You're representing yourself, correct?
I am myself.
I'm in pro per persona.
I'm sorry? I'm in propria persona.
Okay, well in any case you don't have an attorney and you'll be running your own defense. Is that what you're telling me?
Yes.
Okay. And so the state's asked to um there's just a state the city of Tumwater is asking to continue the trial. Did you see that motion?
No.
Um But I'll take your word Thank you.
Uh but I will tell you what the what the substance of the motion is.
I I have to explain a few this the last hearing. I wasn't I was poisoned by insecticide.
I bought anti-flea uh spray for my dog and it said non-toxic on it so I sprayed it all over the house and my bed and my clothes and it knocked me out for 2 weeks and I I still lose my balance sometimes. It was really poison.
>> Okay. Just because you can ingest insecticide doesn't mean you should ingest insecticide. The same logic applies to representing yourself in a court of law. I'm sorry to hear that.
Uh but uh here's where we're at on the trial. The fact the state filed a motion.
Let's see. What is Right now trial is set for confirmation is October 22nd in two days.
And then the trial set for October 29th and 30th. The state's asking to move that because uh they have a witness issue. One of the police officer apparently is not available on that time.
And so they want to move the trial you maybe a week or two. And I guess I would get your position on that request.
Well, what will happen if I decline that? If I object to it?
>> Well, then they they're asking I then I get to decide whether or not the state has shown good cause to continue the trial or not. And then one of um two things can happen I guess. I can um you're objecting I can sustain your objection, not continue the trial, and then the state would probably be out of luck. Or I could find good cause because a material witness is unavailable and then I can go um a little bit beyond what a speedy trial is uh um to uh to allow the trial to uh um take place with the state's witness. And I can tell you a couple of things. One thing that um this is a fairly common occurrence from both the defense and the state. And when if a defense comes to me and says, "Hey look, I need to I need these witnesses to defend my case, but they're not available. Can we move the trial?"
I'll generally accommodate that. I'll let people put on their defense. But the same is true for the state.
They have a witness and I think is there who [clears throat] is material to their case and uh they can't proceed without, I'll give the state some leeway to find good cause and reset the trial to when the witness can appear.
So that might be a spoiler alert, but that's it's up to you. You don't have to agree. No one's asking you that. I'm just asking I'm telling you what the state's asking.
I'm telling you what generally happens in situations like this.
And I'm just asking for your response and then I'll make a ruling.
Okay, if you deny the the prosecution's request, then the trial would be held in 2 days?
No, the trial I don't know what would happen if they denied the state's request, then if the state can't proceed, they can't.
But I think I kind of hinted that generally I grant this type of motion, but I but I cuz I want to be up front with you. But it's up to you as to how you want to decide. Well, I object to their motion.
All right. I'm going to find good cause to continue the trial because of the state's unavailability of a state's witness.
I'm going to ask Ms. Kidmarker when's the soonest available date that you can be ready and have a trial and I'll set it for that date.
Uh your honor, my understanding is the officer's unavailable through November 8th. Um other than that, I don't have notes as to other unavailable dates.
So, what we're going to do then, um Mr. Blatt, we're going to set the trial for November 17th and 18th and then we'll have con- firmation on um We can put these on for on November 12th, which is a Wednesday at the afternoon.
Uh may I ask something?
Uh I think as I understand the hearing I missed was the motions hearing, right?
No, this is the motion hearing.
Okay, I'm not prepared cuz as I said, I was sick and I'm still recovering. Well, then you should ask for a continuance.
Just try not to eat any more bug killer between now and then. No, but the motion is Hang on a second. The motion is to continue the trial.
And I've already asked you what your response to that is. Oh, so it's the prosecution's motion, but I also Didn't I also notice a motion hearing?
Okay. We can re-note that if you want.
What I didn't see your I didn't see that. That's not what I'm here for here today. When did you When did you ask for that motion hearing to be held Oh, I see. Your Honor, at the hearing back on September 3rd, I see a note for a motion hearing set for today. Defendant must file his motion no later than October 6th, and >> Well, that was me.
Okay.
>> Yeah, did you ever file anything?
I don't think so because uh like I said, I was >> You were sick. I I get it. Yeah, all right. Well, you're still free to What's Let's see.
Well, do you want that motion heard?
Yes, please. But, I'm not >> You better file it. I mean, you were supposed to file something by um October 8th. We didn't get anything.
Right.
Can we uh reset that and the deadline for me to submit the motions? Yes, we can do that, but we'll probably In order to accommodate that, we're going to have to move this trial out a little bit further.
Okay, past the speedy date? Yes. It's already past the speedy date based on my finding of good cause because of the state's material witness unavailability.
I can At your request, if you want your motion heard before that, we we'll need I'll accommodate that, but we're going to have to mess with the dates a little bit. Okay, I'll waive speedy trial rights for that. Okay. Well, I don't even think we need to get there.
I can make findings. Okay, so let's forget those dates. Let me redo these dates here.
Well, let me ask you, how are you feeling now? How quickly can you get your motion together?
Um I'm doing okay. Like I said, I lose my balance sometimes, but I'm getting better. Um I I I'm I'm just asking you for a time limit. How much time do you need? I'll give you the time you need. I just want to know how much you need. One week.
>> Huh?
All right.
>> One week.
So, hang on just a day. Let me Let me take a look here.
And Your Honor, I'm not sure what type of motion or whether it's going to be something that requires officer testimony, so I would just ask that it be My guess is it's what if it's constitutional grounds and if you need officer testimony, you can ask to to reset it, but I just I would ask that it be set after November 8th. All right.
Cuz your officers are pretty present.
All right, so we're going to set a motion hearing for November 10th.
All right?
Yes.
You need to have your motion filed by uh October uh 27th. So, a week from today. So, you have a week to get your motion together.
Get it filed by October 27th.
The state uh needs to get their response in by November 3rd.
And then the motion will be heard on November 10th.
Why don't we just do a confirmation for that date also? And then I already moved the trial date to November 17th and 18th. We'll just leave that date. And then the confirmation will be the same as the motion hearing date on on November 10th. And if he's successful, then uh we'll do it that way. And you said trial 17th and 18th? What's that? 17th and 18th. Okay.
>> [clears throat] >> Okay, so do you understand where we're at?
Yes.
When do you need to have your motion filed by?
By the 27th, one week.
Right. And then the state by the 3rd, we'll see everybody back here on the 10th.
Okay. Thank you.
>> Hang on a second, I have another question for you. Have you been getting text reminders of court dates? Yes.
Great. Uh we'll see you back here and then this will be excluded from speedy trial calculation. I'll make that finding based on the witness unavailability and to accommodate Mr. Blatt's uh ability to get his motion in.
All right, so that wraps up his first hearing. The next one took place a few weeks later and it looks like he's decided to cut out all the safe parts of his diet and go straight for the organophosphates and ether instead. Good >> [snorts] >> pleasure to be here.
Mr. Black, you filed various motions to dismiss the driving suspended license third degree against you.
I read all of it and you know, we are getting kind of late in the morning here. Is there anything you'd like to say that is different from or you'd like to highlight from the motions that you Well, first may I ask uh the court to identify yourself and the prosecutor.
Certainly, uh I'm Court Commissioner Jacob Stillman. Uh-huh.
And uh Prosecutor today is Ford Libby, uh rule 9 supervised by Rosemary Fitzgerald.
Okay. Yes, uh >> [snorts and clears throat] >> when the officer stopped me, he asked me for paperwork.
>> [snorts] >> And suddenly accused me of a paperwork violation. He asked for three things, license, proof of insurance, and registration.
Anyone who's engaged in a potentially hazardous activity like operating a motor vehicle has to have his paperwork in order, especially insurance because he can cause damage with his car.
Excuse me.
Same thing is true with yourself because being a judge is a potentially hazardous occupation because it involves violence.
Uh no one can be put in a jail cell without unwanted touching.
Um and a lot of damage can come to people if a judge does something wrong. And as a person who has been through a family court and witnessed how unprofessional and out of control the judiciary is here in Washington, and I think you know that the reputation of the legal system in Washington is very bad.
I mean, even at one point the federal government had to come in and supervise and babysit the police because they weren't being controlled. So, I'm going to just try to frame what I'm looking for.
And again, I did read what you what you briefed. And so, maybe it would be helpful if sort of I outline my thinking here. So, it will give you a chance to respond.
I'll give the chance for the city of Tumwater as well to to weigh in here.
But, let me just kind of start where I'm at. That sounds good. Sure.
All right. Cuz I know a lot of your arguments are sort of based on sort of overall authority to enforce these laws against you.
So, I'll sort of start there.
Right. So, the Revised Code of Washington, which is the state legal code that is applicable here to criminal offenses related to driver's license.
It provides that RCW 46.23.42 that it's unlawful for anyone to drive a motor vehicle in the state while a person has a suspended or revoked driver's license.
The allegations against you is that you were driving a motor vehicle on a public road with a suspended driver's license. And those are still allegations against you. That hasn't been proven.
But, the city of Tumwater is within its authority to pursue that prosecution because you were allegedly driving a car with a suspended license.
And so, I know you you've raised a number of concerns around that. One of them being, you know, right to travel.
You have the right to travel. You don't have a right in any particular mode of travel. So, driving a car does trigger certain Excuse me. Excuse me.
You are I've been in this court already. I think this is the fifth time. And each time I've heard the judge make the arguments that the prosecutor is supposed to make.
In other words, the judge has been prosecuting. No, that's not what's happening. The judge is just laying out the letter of the law under the Revised Washington Statutes. The prosecution is the one bringing the case. And they don't need the judge's help to prove you were driving without a license or that you didn't have insurance at the time.
Now, the judge does end up dismissing one of the charges, but he's still very much facing the rest of them. May I get back on track because I was making a point. I was heading toward a point when you asked to interject. Sure. Okay. So, what we need to take care of some preliminary matters first, just as I had to produce paperwork when officer saw me what he believed to be engaged in privileged activity, you need your paperwork in order too, and I just need to verify that your paperwork is in order. I am eager to argue my motions, and I'm eager to hear the prosecutor's response, but first, we need to know if you have your license to operate, which is your oath of office. That's analogous to a driver's license. It's because nobody has a right to be a judge. It's a privilege. And also, your bond, your official bond through a surety company is analogous to a insurance for a driver because if I'm injured in the course of these proceedings, I need to know that I can be compensated.
Um so, >> You're welcome to file a public records request asking for any documentation around my authority as the court commissioner or anyone else in the Right, and I couldn't do that cuz I didn't know who would appear today as the court as a judge. I mean, I asked before, and I couldn't get a clear answer.
Um also, your bond is supposed to be filed with the county clerk.
And with your permission, I mean, I want to make it easy for you. Don't want to make you produce it for me. I could go around the corner to the same building here and verify that your bond is filed with sufficient sureties.
>> So, we're not going to do that today for for relevancy purposes here. Um because what's what's relevant here is not anything related to me, it's related to allegations against you driving. It absolutely is relevant to you.
Because it all it's all about whether you have jurisdiction and you don't have jurisdiction without your oath of office timely filed and a bond with sufficient sureties. And I have a pocket brief here that I'll I'll give you the court and a copy to the prosecutor to show you >> to I'm going to stop you again.
>> I don't mean to interrupt here, but but you you have the opportunity to look at those documents. If you're able to find documents in any way, you know, indicating that we don't have the proper authority or operate as a court in this case, you're welcome to get those documents and present them. But we're not during the course of the prosecution going to chase down every indication without any supported evidence that something's amiss here. So, if you have something through a public records request, you're able to bring it.
Um but we're not going to chase down all of those uh all of those arguments as they as they pop up. We're not going to play whack-a-mole necessarily with arguments being made uh without evidence. So, if I had told the officer who stopped me that I have a driver's license, I have insurance, trust me. I your job to go look for it, not mine to produce it.
What do you think he would have done?
Well, he probably would have just gone back to his car, pulled up his computer, and tried to verify the validity of your driver's license. Then he likely would have cited RCW 46.20.017 instead of RCW 46.20.010.
Section.010 makes it clear you must have a valid driver's license to operate a motor vehicle, and.017 requires you to have it in your possession and present it to a law enforcement officer when requested.
>> know. I wasn't there. Well, we all know what he you have done. He would have said, "That don't cut it."
Well, these are all comments that you made in your briefing. So, I'm I'm going to again remind you I've read those arguments you made.
I'm going to give a copy of my pocket brief showing that the judge and prosecutor both require bonding and insurance. And I'll with your permission If you have evidence that there hasn't been proper bonding, you can certainly bring I'm giving it. Well, that's my evidence, my testimony here.
Right.
Well, you're not alleging it hasn't happened. I am alleging it hasn't happened.
I am alleging that. Right. With your permission, I'll give the court a copy of the pocket brief I just gave to the prosecutor. Sure, but then I'm going to turn it over to the prosecutor um to have an opportunity to respond.
Isn't it my turn to present my motions?
Yes, and and you have and No, I have not. You have. You You You provided written motions.
Um You've been given some time to to sort of summarize what your arguments are here. Um so, we also want to hear from both sides.
>> I need to make a statement for the record so the appellate court can understand What's it's It's 11:33.
You You got till 11:14.
And I'm going to turn it over to the city attorney. Well, if the prosecutor wants you to take 3 months out of my life, you have to give me enough time because the taxpayers are going to pay for this.
You see, when the officer first stopped me, it was mistakenly thought that I would pay the $66 fine or however how much it is. And what what What's going to happen is the opposite.
The plaintiff is going to house me, clothe me, feed me, take care of all my needs, medical needs, and everything.
And I'll get to watch television. I love to watch television. And I love to kick back and relax. And that's what's ultimately going to happen, but we're going to go through due process first. I won't be denied due process.
So, the Every district judge, this is RCW 3.34.080.
Every district judge, district judge pro tempore, and district court commissioner shall before entering upon the duties of office take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States >> [clears throat] >> and the Constitution of the state of Washington.
And as far as bonds, every judge of a municipal court before entering upon the duties of office shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation. I do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Washington. The judge shall also give such bonds to the state and city for the faithful performance of the judge's duties as may be by law or or ordinance or directed.
The prosecutor's bond, every county official before he or enters the upon the duties of his or her office shall furnish a bond conditioned that he will faithfully perform the duties of his or her office.
>> [clears throat] >> Prosecuting attorney shall file it in the amount of $5,000 with sureties to be approved by the proper county legislative authority.
Tumwater police officers also have to have a bond and that's RCW 35A.12.080.
As far as so it's very very important. It's not just a joke or something that's not important. It's very important that you have an oath of office on file because from what I've observed in this court and many many courts throughout the last 40 years living in this state that judges hate to follow the Constitution. They [clears throat] despise it.
So, I need to ascertain that you have a timely filed oath of office. Now, I did make a public disclosure request for all the judges that might be operating in this court and I have them here.
I want to make sure your name is on it.
>> [clears throat] >> I have a oath of office for a John Tunheim.
It's not you, right?
Remind you too, you've got till 11:40.
It's 11:36.
What if it takes longer? Then I guess you won't have time to go through all the saliva-stained glass panes you brought in either. But that doesn't mean it's all just going to disappear.
So, the best thing you can do is get a lawyer and have them argue why you shouldn't be required to follow the same rules and regulations that everyone else does. I because sir, I'm I'm telling you again, I I've read what you've written and you're frankly not making arguments that are relevant to your possible Um the >> You're allowed to to speak, but unless you're If you have evidence and you're If you have evidence there that you wanted to present to the court, you should look at it beforehand and then make an allegation.
>> Well, you're reading through what you the response to your public records act.
>> You said I should make a public disclosure request for your oath of office and bond and that's what I've done and here I'm going through it.
>> Right, you should go through it before the hearing. Well, I didn't know who you were until I just sat down here. Well, we I didn't know who the prosecutor was.
You're all right. I don't want to belabor the point, but just to make sure that we're being as effective as possible here. I I This is falls outside of the scope of today's hearing.
>> I know. I know. I know. No, it does not because my brief addresses the importance of obeying the Constitution of the United States and the state of Washington.
>> tell you I have my oath of office. I took it a couple of weeks ago. I granted I'm newer here, um but I took it in this very room.
Well, I could not find it. Unless it's here. Unless it's here because I was given all the oaths of every judge that could possibly be working here. That's what I requested.
I also I an oath of office for it's John Doe again.
Give me a few minutes.
As far as bonds As far as bonds, Joel L. Lapierre is supposed to have a bond. That's not you though, right?
What is your bonding number? I don't know.
Okay, so before we can proceed, we have to take care of this preliminary matter.
That's not true.
Uh well You're welcome to bring evidence that I'm not a correct judicial officer for this, but again, we're not going to play whack-a-mole. Well, you're supposed to prove it to me, just like I was supposed to prove it to the officer that stopped me, that my paperwork was in order before engaging in a privileged activity. I certainly believe that, but that's not the law. You don't What is Can you cite the law then? No, you're asking me to cite a law that doesn't exist. A judicial officer does not need to present their bonding number.
But you need to have a bonding number, and we've determined that you don't.
I requested the bonding information and the oaths of office of every judicial officer that could be working in this court, and they gave it to me all here, but your name doesn't appear to be on it.
Well, it it That's prima facie evidence that you don't have an oath of office or bond.
Okay, well then you can file a motion on that specific question.
If you if you like, but you got 2 more minutes for this morning.
>> Okay, I'd like to file that motion right now.
You don't have it. You got to go file a motion first. I can make a verbal motion. I can make a make it orally.
Do you want me to find the RCW, the statute that allows me to make it orally? Sure, and then you can go and you you'd have to Well, I can't give you legal advice, but You gave me a lot of legal advice today.
The prosecutor said nary a word. You have 1 more Well, cuz we've been giving you a chance to speak, and you've got 1 more minute before we turn it to the prosecutor.
Well, I have to determine whether we have jurisdiction here.
>> No, that's not up to you.
I Well, it's up to you, but you're not making a decision on it.
Yes, we do have jurisdiction. I'm telling you I have an oath of office.
But that's not enough. Me telling the police officer I have a driver's license is not enough.
The allegation is that you did not have a valid Yeah, a surgeon telling his licensing authority I have a license without proving it is not enough. If someone lies about having a medical license, they're still going to go through the same basic due process as someone charged with driving without a valid driver's license. The key difference is in the severity of the offense. Driving without a license is typically a misdemeanor, while practicing medicine without a license can be a felony with far more serious penalties. So, while the legal process is similar, the consequences are on a completely different level. We have prima facie evidence here that you don't have an oath of office or bonding.
And the Constitution You say you have an oath of office.
Well, that means you swore to uphold the Constitution. The Constitution requires you to have an oath of office timely filed. And RCW title 42 says if you don't have a timely filed, you're not lawfully in office. That means that you can't preside over this hearing. And to the extent you want an answer right now, I'm denying that motion. If you want to file something in writing that goes into that in more detail and provide some kind of evidence that I don't have authority, you're able to do that.
I don't know when you made your public records request. It might have been before I took my oath of office, but we're out of time for for your arguments at this point.
>> What's How do you spell your name? S T I S T I L L L L W E W E >> L L L L First name Jacob with an E.
Okay.
I'm going to not participate in an unlawful hearing.
So, I'm going to go over to the clerk's office and try to get your oath of office and bond. And if they have it, I'll be back here and let's proceed. I'm actually eager to do so. All right.
You're going to have to file a motion.
We're not going to be probably be here anymore when you come back.
Closes up at noon. You don't operate after lunchtime at all? No, the calendar is going to end at noon. So, you if you find something, you can file a motion, but we're not going to stay open to see you when you come back.
Okay. Well, I came here at 9:00 cuz I thought things would start then and I had to endure watching all this.
>> Sir, we're out of time.
That is all.
So, um that's what I'm going to do because I'm not going to participate in an unfair hearing where there's no jurisdiction.
I will file another motion.
>> comments here cuz we got to move on.
Uh My final comments are this.
We're going to assume that you don't have uh an oath of office timely filed or bonding. So, you can't proceed over this hearing. And you can go get that and do that. You can come back, but until then, we're going to unless the prosecutor has anything to say.
>> Okay, so then I since I object >> Sir, I'm I'm moving it over to the prosecutor. Well, since I'm object Wait, I have a right to make my motions. I have a right to argue my motions. I brought this hearing. I understand that and we're going to move on.
>> I brought this hearing, not the prosecutor. I'm going to move on. So, I'm going to ask you to recuse yourself since you're not well All right. Well, if there's been a request for recusal, perhaps I won't be here at the next hearing, but that's going to be it for today, okay?
You can go.
Well, sir, we're also here set for trial confirmation.
You have a jury trial set.
I haven't even mentioned the plea yet.
Well, you don't have I mean, the state is moving forward.
Probable cause has been found.
Uh you've elected to represent yourself against Um am myself. I don't represent myself. I am myself. Are you ready to proceed to trial on November 17th?
Uh first I have to be advised of the nature and cause of action and enter a plea.
>> [clears throat] >> And I have to verify that the judge, which keeps rotating, is unlawfully in office.
I mean I I'm not trying to throw monkey wrenches in this or anything or give you a hard time. I'm just trying to require due process.
You were arraigned on June 26th, 2023.
Determination of probable cause was found.
You're out. Just a response >> Well, you said I'm free to leave and you're not lawfully in office, so I'm going to leave. Okay. Well, you're out.
If the defendant's going to walk out, I would request a bench warrant be issued if he's just going to walk out of his own trial confirmation.
All right, sir, are you here with him?
Is that Were you the two of you speaking?
I heard a part of it. I was asking if the two of you were here together. Um I have a I can't hear. Were you here with Mr. Black?
Uh I don't have the case here. Okay, were you Were you here with Mr. Black?
Who was just up here.
Uh I I can't really hear you. The I'm getting a hearing >> Why Why are you here? I haven't had the all the cases Okay. Why Why are you here in court today? Oh, I'm just here to observe. With Mr. Black?
Okay. I I watched the body language.
Okay. Uh I watched the body language panel on YouTube and I'm watching this video to watch the body language. All right. Thank you, sir.
Okay, thank you, sir. You're free to go.
Yes. I don't have an issue with people observing sovereign citizen court cases to understand the mistakes others have made. That said, that's the end of today's video. I'm pretty sure this won't be the last time we see insecticide boy.
And when he's back in court, I'll make sure to bring it to you. So, if you liked the video, hit the like button. If you didn't, hit dislike. Either way, leave a comment below and subscribe with notifications on so you don't miss any of my content.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











