Lawyer Defending D4VD Has United the Internet

Added: 2026-05-09

[00:00:00]If Hitler was alive today, right now, his charges are mass genocide, amongst other things, would you represent him?

[00:00:06]>> I represent him. I do that and I say that.

[00:00:09]>> I'm serious. I'm serious. Because he's charged with it.

[00:00:11]>> Allegedly.

[00:00:12]>> Just Yeah. Allegedly. Just because you're charged with it doesn't mean you you actually did it. All right.

[00:00:16]>> Number one. And then number two, you have this thing called the presumption of innocence.

[00:00:19]>> So, you're dating a woman, your girlfriend gets beaten near to death in front of you. The case lands on your desk. Do you represent that individual?

[00:00:26]>> I would love to. I would love to. So, if someone beat the [ __ ] out of your mother and you got the case presented to you, would you defend that individual?

[00:00:34]>> Yes, I would.

[00:00:38]>> He would.

[00:00:40]He said he would defend the individual who beat his mama.

[00:00:46]Girl, I ain't going to say that might be the way he got like that.

[00:00:50]Went over there after your live and I was doing yard work with my earbuds and I was yelling at myself in the backyard.

[00:00:56]bro was making me so mad. That's what made me need to come on here today and talk about this with y'all truly. Um, I have some thought. This is Jitton. Oh, that's not like a particularly flattering. Um, okay. There. This is Jidion right here. He's the host of the show. He's a popular famous almost um streamer. He's a predator catcher. He runs in the predator catcher circles.

[00:01:19]This guy right here, we're gonna get an introduction to um the the person who um the the BJ Investigates production headquarters studio team put together this kind of more like a compilation or a clip from it. This um but he's a lawyer. He's a criminal defense lawyer.

[00:01:36]He practices criminal defense and he also represented Jitton. And so Jion brought him on yesterday. Joma is his last name or the name he goes by. and um pretty much this guy um not only poked a bunch of holes in the David case, he also took the holes that also that already were in the case and ripped them wide open. And basically like by the end of the stream I was like a little bit even like shook and like you know what the prosecutors are going to have to buckle down because if the lawyers on David's case come as hard as um Joma just came at this case they might actually give the prosecutors some problems in front of a jury. He don't know me from Adam. Neither one of them know me from Adam. Um I'm just a little a little baby YouTuber over here. I do want to say I am a lawyer. I did go to the University of Pennsylvania law school. I don't practice law. Nothing I say in this video should be taken as legal advice. I don't have any extra inside information about this case. I'm just going with what I've seen. I have been following it for months and months, probably seven, eight months now since um April. I mean, since September, and I have been on the case um commentating on it for a while. I do have somewhat of a bias, but I do try to keep logic and truth at the forefront here because I personally think this the most important thing is justice for Celeste and the truth to come out. Um, but justice for Celeste should not depend on anybody lying. Um, I'll leave it at that.

[00:03:13]>> Any thoughts about Joma?

[00:03:15]>> JM's one of the best young attorneys, promising upcoming lawyers that I've met in a long time. Yes, he's like a shark and once he smells the scent, he does not get off. You go for blood.

[00:03:25]>> Oh yeah, definitely.

[00:03:26]>> Straight for the jugular.

[00:03:28]>> Um, don't tell me what to do in my chat.

[00:03:30]If you don't want to give him attention, get off my channel. Bye.

[00:03:32]>> Anybody watching this right now, you don't go to prison for something that happened in real life. You go to prison for something that happens in the courtroom. Does that make sense?

[00:03:44]>> Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense.

[00:03:45]>> It's a sad world to live in. You could literally in in real life be innocent of whatever they're accusing you of doing, but because the prosecutors have done things in secrecy or they provided skewed evidence or skewed witnesses, you're looking at prison time and it's going to be really really real when it gets there. So, we got to make sure like we do everything in the open.

[00:04:10]>> That's true. I I think everything needs to be in the open.

[00:04:12]>> You you know what I So, according to investigators, Celeste was last seen or heard from on April 23rd, 2025 when David, according to prosecutors, sent a ride share car to pick her up from her hometown of Lake Elenor and bring her back to the home that he was apparently renting in the Hollywood Hills, a trip of more than 80 miles. Prosecutors claim she was.

[00:04:32]>> It's funny because like you know how kids in the spelling bee will do like you ever seen a spelling bee and the kids will like snap when they're doing the um the words a n t I d i s e s t a b l i s h m e n t a you know what I mean? Like they they they like do a little like I like I feel like I can see this guy's brain moving through what he's doing with his hand. like he's like he's ready to he's getting his next argument ready and he's like got that little devilish smirk.

[00:05:06]Look at him. He looks like he's gonna pounce >> messages with David during this ride and then she apparently never uses the phone again. Celeste dismembered body was found months.

[00:05:15]>> So what would you say about that? It's like they have evidence that he ordered the ride to her to pick her up. She's on the way there. She's texting him while she's on the way there and then she never uses her phone again. Number one, how do you know it's her texting? How do you know it's David texting?

[00:05:33]How do we know that? There's accusations that he killed her. How do he killed her? Which did with his left hand, his right hand? Did he choke her first? Was his DNA there? How good is that DNA? Did y'all even check the DNA?

[00:05:47]>> They did say they found DNA inside of his garage.

[00:05:51]>> Was it her DNA?

[00:05:53]>> Yes.

[00:05:53]>> Like absolutely for sure it's her DNA.

[00:05:55]Was it her DNA regarding the murder or beforehand?

[00:05:59]>> They're saying it was the murder.

[00:06:00]They're saying that the murder happened in the garage.

[00:06:02]>> Yeah, I know. But how can they can they prove Can the prosecutors prove that her DNA was not there before that alleged murder?

[00:06:11]>> That's going to be hard. And that was a point he made yesterday that I was like, true. And like again, I mean, the prosecutors, I'm sure, in the last seven months have gathered some kind of evidence. Um, but if they're trying to say she was disassembled in that garage, there better be disassembly proof up on the roof because we're talking chainsaw.

[00:06:33]That thing's moving so fast spewing whatever it picks up in its little teeth up on September 8th in a Tesla Model X allegedly registered to David. And according to this filing, the car had been parked on the street just 400 ft from where David was staying and then it was towed. The manager at the towyard reported a horrific smell. flies around the front trunk and that's when authorities discovered Celeste's body.

[00:06:58]According to this document, it's called the People's Brief regarding preliminary hearing evidence. Quote, "Surveillance video and other evidence confirm defendant, meaning David, was the last person to drive the vehicle on July 29th, 2025 before he left Los Angeles on a concert tour."

[00:07:15]>> So with him being the last person to how like So this is a big deal, right? with him being the last person to drive the car.

[00:07:24]>> I can see it looks bad, but there's so many different things that could have happened. He could have drove it for a little bit, had somebody else drive it.

[00:07:31]>> But they're saying that he was the last person to drive it.

[00:07:34]>> That's what they're saying. But do you have the video? Like, I want to see that. Do y'all have the video from the time that he went to that vehicle to the time that the dead body was found? How are you so sure about that? You know, there's so many different uh possibilities out there and they're very reasonable.

[00:07:52]you know, so that's what I look at.

[00:07:55]>> So that's about what month or so before the car was towed and the body was found. It's not clear if anyone else actually moved the car or had any knowledge of what was reportedly inside.

[00:08:04]I want you to keep that in mind. We're going to talk about it later. There's something in the filing that I thought was really interesting. But it goes on to say, quote, "At the towyard, LAPD detectives opened the Tesla's front storage compartment and observed a black cadaavver bag covered in insects. Inside the bag, they discovered a severely decomposed head and torso. A plastic garbage bag beneath the black cadaavver bag contained the dismembered arms and legs. However, the victim's ring and pinky fingers on her left hand had been amputated and were not found in the Tesla. On September 16th, 2025, the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner's Department positively identified the body from dental records as belonging to the victim. But this is the part. So that's that's that's pretty bad. So where are we at right now? Anything in here? What what what's going through your mind right now?

[00:08:55]>> Yeah. Like why >> what's going through my mind right now?

[00:08:57]Is is Jesse Weieber okay?

[00:09:00]That was what was I mean truly that's what was going through my mind. I was so distracted by the the look of this gaunt man. I mean I hope everything's going okay with him.

[00:09:07]>> The fingers.

[00:09:08]>> EXACTLY. YEAH. EXACT J. THANK YOU. WHY?

[00:09:13]WHY THE FINGER THAT COINCIDENT?

[00:09:15]>> This is the argument where it's like, okay, now I just feel like I'm being I'm being effed with, but he says it like he really means it.

[00:09:22]>> Elyently has the word David on it. Why?

[00:09:25]>> Why did they cut the David finger?

[00:09:27]>> Because it's perfect. It makes David look more guilty.

[00:09:30]>> It does make him look guilty, but maybe it's because he's guilty, >> y'all. And this is good chat. Genuinely, this level of rage bait is what we're going to see when this goes to trial.

[00:09:44]>> It's true. They >> If you guys are mad right now, >> and it's what they're actually going to do is going to be going to be way worse.

[00:09:49]Cuz I think this guy is kind of still a little bit like playing nice. Like when these lawyers come out here, they're going to be making Celeste look bad.

[00:09:58]They're going to be calling her everything but a child of God. They're going to be saying she was on OAF. She was doing this. She was doing that. She was manipulating these. They're going to be making her the dead the dead victim.

[00:10:07]They're going to be coming for her throat just like they did in the Diddy trial to Cassie to um Mia to Jane Joe the same way. But didn't you also didn't she also they're going to get her ex-boyfriends in there. Didn't she also initiate beep beep beep with you that one time? Didn't she also tell you she was 18 or 19, but really she was blah blah blah? Didn't she cheat on David?

[00:10:32]Didn't she steal money from David?

[00:10:33]Wasn't she using him for money? And when the money ran out, she decided she was going to like they're going to make this little girl. This guy doesn't go that hard against Celeste. He really goes against the cops. He really goes against the DA. Um but he doesn't go that hard against Celeste. And when they go into real court, oh, they're going to crucify her.

[00:10:57]Robbery homicide detectives determined that Celeste and David met in January of 2022 when she was just 11 years old.

[00:11:06]That >> is that illegal?

[00:11:08]>> Is that illegal?

[00:11:11]>> Meeting her? No. Meeting her when she was 11 is not illegal.

[00:11:15]>> He met somebody at 11 years old. I don't see that being illegal.

[00:11:19]>> But they didn't say it was either.

[00:11:21]>> That's the other thing, too. The prosecutors didn't say that that was illegal. They just said David met her when she was 11 and then when she was 13, the illegal part started of their relationship. Yes, that is illegal. What they claim happened. Um, so no, it's not illegal, but the prosecutors are also not saying it's illegal. This is kind of like the thing that Harvey Leven and Mark G and uh what's his name? Charles were doing yesterday where they were like, "How do they know David watched?

[00:11:50]How do they know David watched? The prosecutor said he watched." And it's like when you pulled up the brief, the prosecutors never said he watched. That was just fake. They just made it up. And it's like, well, that's not how do they know that? How do they know that? How do they know that? And it was like, y'all calm down. Take a freaking beta blocker.

[00:12:06]No one said he stood by and watched all making it up. It's a straw man argument.

[00:12:10]And that's kind of the same thing Joma is doing here. He's like, that's not illegal. It's like, well, he's not being charged for meeting her. That's not the char. The charge starts September 2023 when he started allegedly by alleged by the prosecutors having asual relations with her. That's when they say that that was illegal. So that's not illegal. No, they didn't say it was illegal. They just gave context for when they met. And it is interesting to know they met when she was 11 because even though they didn't start doing anything until after that, according to prosecutors, she was 11. 11 years old, like sixth grade, like very young. So maybe seventh.

[00:12:48]So it's interesting in its context, but not every word in an indictment or in a charging document is supposed to be that was illegal. Like it's just storytelling. Like is that illegal? Like no, but no one said it was illegal.

[00:13:02]>> Young fans, because of his music, music reaches out to everybody and every in every age. It touches every human being regardless of race, religion, creed, doesn't matter. make you mad.

[00:13:13]>> She was probably a good fan of his and he probably offered her an opportunity to get into the music business and that happens a lot.

[00:13:23]>> Okay. For people who want to be in the music business, they want to be interns, right? It happens.

[00:13:30]>> So, you're saying that he got in contract with her to give an 11-year-old a job?

[00:13:34]>> I will tell you this. I have it in in my uh some of my online platforms. I don't respond to it cuz I don't really run it, but I can see like people would text me and say, "Hey, I'm in, you know, I'm in fourth grade. I want to be a lawyer. I want to learn from you. I want to be an intern." So, I can see that.

[00:13:51]>> So, this is where it goes from like, "Is it illegal to like should you be doing that type of stuff?" Like if an 11year-old messages me, hey, I want to be a lawyer one day. Hey, I want to be a YouTuber one day. I'm gonna say, oh my god, that's, you know, so cool. Where's your mom?

[00:14:12]Like, I have no interest at all whatsoever in talking to an 11-year-old.

[00:14:19]>> So, yeah, there's definitely going to be travel records of her being on these flights.

[00:14:22]>> You know what that sounds like?

[00:14:24]>> What?

[00:14:24]>> That sounds like an internship. A great internship that people would be so jealous about.

[00:14:30]And not only is just an internship like to a to a office, it's traveling to Las Vegas, London, Texas. Wow. I would be jealous of that, too.

[00:14:40]>> 11 years.

[00:14:40]>> I'm very jealous. I'm jealous of that right now. And I'm an attorney.

[00:14:45]I want to take that internship, David.

[00:14:46]Take me on an internship. I'll take that.

[00:14:50]Oh, but you're going to give it to this girl? What does she Why does she deserve that? I deserve that more than more than her. Oh, I hate David now. You know what?

[00:15:03]>> There's a very useful I don't know um rhetorical tool to use right here and it's called so what. All right. And I want you to just remember so what. What is David accused of doing?

[00:15:17]Unlawfully having s relations continuously with a person under 14 years old.

[00:15:23]Murder and mutilating a body. A corpse. Okay.

[00:15:28]Th that's what he's that's what he's accused of. So this guy is acting like he had the greatest idea of all that maybe there was some internship. Yeah, maybe there was an internship. So what he's saying, well that would make other people jealous, right? But is there any proof at all whatsoever that other people did this crime? And that's the question that hasn't been answered yet.

[00:15:49]If there is proof other people did this crime, well, the prosecution should definitely release that proof or that evidence. But so what? I don't believe this whole internship thing, but it it kind of get like people get so mad. It's like, well, who would give an 11-year-old an internship? I mean, this is a great question, but so what? Is David accused of giving an 11-year-old an internship? No. Is he charged with living with her in the house? No. He's charged with carrying on a continuous relationship with her in the illegal nature.

[00:16:22]If he had a if he had a if if he gave Celeste an internship and someone else was jealous, so what? Like the same way that he says that J says there's just not enough evidence. They don't have enough evidence. I would need to see the evidence. He don't have evidence for what he's saying either. He's just make he's just pulling stuff out of thin air.

[00:16:38]So hopefully when it goes to real trial, the the prosecution does have this evidence and they present it to the jury in a way that none of these arguments even matter.

[00:16:49]Let's Let's find a way to make him go down because he gave this opportunity to somebody else and not me.

[00:16:59]>> David, when are we going to see uh a 13-year-old girl go on an internship with J?

[00:17:05]>> Yeah. 12, 13. Yeah.

[00:17:07]>> I'm too busy. I'm sorry to tell y'all whoever, you know, my fans out there, man, I'm going to jails. I'm going to go visit my clients. I travel all over.

[00:17:16]Like I'm constantly out there. It's hard to get an internship with me.

[00:17:20]>> There have to be parent permission for it to be an internship.

[00:17:24]>> I have no idea about parent permission or not. I don't even know if it's even legal. Like you need to have the parents permission. Like it's in the code. You must have a parents permission before they can get an internship.

[00:17:36]>> Okay. One thing about Okay. Internship.

[00:17:39]Traveling across the country without a parents permission. Wouldn't that be kidnapping?

[00:17:46]No, kidnapping is doing it and then she goes ahead and says, "I've been kidnapped." If she's been to one of those places already and she didn't say she got kidnapped, that's not a kidnapping. That's an internship.

[00:17:58]>> He literally just made that up. Like, he's just saying that with so much conviction. It's not true.

[00:18:03]>> It's a positive thing that's going on.

[00:18:04]And David is doing that by showing how good of a person he is by allowing somebody to learn from him.

[00:18:10]>> So, wait, so that you you cannot be charged with kidnapping. So you're saying how how could he not be charged with kidnapping? Let's say she was still alive and the parents filed a complaint.

[00:18:21]Would that would they not charge him with kidnapping?

[00:18:23]>> I don't if a girl was kidnapped, she would have called the police at the >> Obviously, this is not true, but this is the type of victim blaming that you can expect at the trial >> that she had every opportunity to use her cell phone to run for help to at any events where there's security to >> this child. This isn't like an adult.

[00:18:44]This is a child.

[00:18:46]>> Anybody would do that. A 5-year-old would say, "I'm being kidnapped. Help me. This guy is trying to take me." So I >> That's absolutely not true. A 5-year-old would do that. Like I was just like, "This is the This is the type of stuff he was saying yesterday where I'm just like, "Okay, so we're just full on lying. Okay, got it."

[00:19:03]>> And this right here, that don't look like a kidnapping. That looks like an internship.

[00:19:09]>> He's just trying to get hired >> and a great one, too. I envy that internship.

[00:19:15]You know what I'm saying? There's people her age going to the museum for a field trip.

[00:19:20]>> And what is what is what is her age >> at this time? 13. When I was 13, you know what my internship was? My internship was uh learning uh music, like playing a saxophone, like >> cutting the grass.

[00:19:34]>> That's all I had from a a college reject. This girl has David, you know?

[00:19:40]Like who wouldn't take that internship?

[00:19:43]This >> bro this is not an inter. You know this is not an internship. This is grooming.

[00:19:46]What? This this is quite literally grooming. YOU CAN'T TAKE A minor across state lines without a parents permission.

[00:19:53]>> That don't LOOK LIKE GROOMING.

[00:19:55]>> BRO, NO. GENUINELY LIKE IS THAT NOT ILLEGAL? YOU CANNOT TAKE A MINOR ACROSS STATE LINES WITHOUT a parents permission.

[00:20:01]>> I don't know that. I got to see the code. I don't I don't see I don't to my recol. Can you take a minor across state lines without a parents permission?

[00:20:12]>> Ah, it could be. Doesn't mean for sure it is.

[00:20:16]>> Okay.

[00:20:16]>> What about in Texas? What would that Let's say you were a prosecutor, would could you charge David for kidnapping if you're a prosecutor?

[00:20:23]>> Bro, if I was a prosecutor, >> if I was a prosecutor, >> and this is Yeah. I mean, it's a good time to just remind everybody who's got their cortisol going up, y'all. None of this has anything to do with He's not charged with kidnapping.

[00:20:36]He's not charged with trafficking. He's charged with having a continuous suual relationship with a minor. He's charged with a murder. He's charged with chopping up mutilating a corpse. Okay?

[00:20:48]Nothing to do with going out of the state. Now, if the feds choose to pick this, if the feds choose to pick this case up and they want to charge trafficking, this that the other, these are questions they might have to contend with.

[00:20:59]>> I see the allegations. I don't know if it's true or not.

[00:21:01]>> No, this is a police report. the police report of when they contacted him because >> let me tell let me tell you about police reports. Police reports aren't fact is not 100% true. The police person who writes this, the agency, they may have a bias against you for whatever reason.

[00:21:17]They may have a bias against your race.

[00:21:19]They may have a bias against your religion. It doesn't mean it's 100% true.

[00:21:24]>> So, we can't even go.

[00:21:25]>> You see what I mean? He's like, "What about this police report that says d."

[00:21:30]And he said, "Well, they could have a bias writing that report, right?" But you know what doesn't have a bias? Body camera footage that's unredacted and uncut. So if there's body camera footage of the police showing up to David's house in LA and it's cops saying, "Hey, that girl's a runaway. Hey, that girl's a minor. And here's David. Oh yeah, I didn't know. I didn't know.

[00:21:49]Now you know." So it doesn't matter about any bias. It doesn't matter about any race. It doesn't matter about any skin, color, religion, or whatever other things, which it's true. He's not wrong.

[00:21:58]Sometimes there is bias in a police department. But but you what's not bias is when you can see it on a camera. Now, I'm sure he would disagree. He would say, "Oh, that could be AI." He says that at some point. So, once he starts going off into the that could be AI woods, I'm just kind of like, I mean, I guess then you got to get an AI expert, even if it's true what he's saying.

[00:22:15]Also, I have no reason to think what he's saying is true either because he's not actually attacking any of the evidence yet. He doesn't know what it is. They haven't made it public. He's just throwing out hypotheticals.

[00:22:25]>> Lyrics or making music for you. That's embarrassing. Um, he could be gay. He could be gay or he could be into trans women. And that's something that a lot of rappers and a lot of straight men are afraid of if she is around him and she knew that. That is a great tool to get what you want.

[00:22:46]>> So, so, so it wouldn't be I don't know, maybe that she's a minor. Could be that.

[00:22:52]>> Well, I know that from the what you showed me, >> but they don't say that either. It could be that she got pregnant. It could be that he she was forced to get a deletion of that pregnancy. It could be that he's selling images of her online. It could be anything. What the prosecutor said was some aspect of their relationship.

[00:23:10]Let me pull up the exit. What >> she had this great opportunity to have an internship and David was nice enough to allow the internship. Sometimes when you allow somebody to be a part of your team, they get to see you personally and maybe she may have seen something or recorded something that could be used against him later on, right?

[00:23:28]>> Whenever he reaches this pinnacle of his success, endorsements, multi-million dollar deals, f >> and that's all the prosecutors are saying, too. So, what Ja is saying right now actually perfectly agrees with what the prosecutor said. I'm just going to read you the excerpt from the brief. Um, they said there were messages on April 22nd, 2025 showing uh David and the victim engaging in a lengthy argument described in detail in their text messages. The messages reveal Celeste's jealousy over David's relationships with other women as David led her to believe they had a future together. She became extremely upset and quote threatened to disclose damaging information about her relationship with the defendant. Okay. She became extremely upset and threatened to disclose damaging information about her relationship with David, quote, to end his career and destroy his life. So, even the prosecutors are saying, "Yep, she threatened him. Sure did.

[00:24:36]And as a result, because David had done those things, he killed her. That's what they're saying. So Jama actually agrees with what the prosecutors are saying right now, even though he's got this devilish grin.

[00:24:46]Tellingly, defendants subsequently purchased tools to carry out his plot to dismember dispose of the victim's body.

[00:24:52]On April 24th, 2025, defendant ordered a shovel from Home Depot that was delivered to his home from Postmates. On May 1st, 2025, defendant ordered and subsequently Amazon delivered two chainsaws to his home. On May 5th, 2025, defendant ordered and Amazon subsequently delivered a body bag, heavyduty laundry bags, and a blue inflatable pool to his home. He >> Look at Jitton. He's like, "Got him."

[00:25:15]>> He made purchases under the fake name Victoria Mendes.

[00:25:18]>> Oh, man. Who is Victoria Mendes?

[00:25:23]>> That sounds like the gardener. I'm not saying all Hispanic people are like landscape people, but it looks like somebody who needs supplies to uh to do work.

[00:25:37]>> Chainsaw.

[00:25:39]>> What What do you need to >> This one is going to be probably the easiest argument. This is This one is going to be the easiest argument for David's team to win, whoever his team ends up being, because very very likely David was not the only person using his credit card. Very very likely his management, his Yes. house staff, his whoever, like the the way that these things work, you see it with Kylie Jenner's getting sued right now by two two lawsuits. Both lawsuits are suing a co not only Kylie Jenner by name but a company and I think it might be Lou Taylor's I haven't made a video about this yet but it's called Tristar Services and the TriStar Services from what I understand from looking into these lawsuits is a company that basically takes care of man it's a house management company so not only um people who do cleaning but people who maybe have like you know they hire the chefs or whatever. So, there's companies that manage people's houses and so if they need to go grocery shopping, if they need to, yes, get um landscaping done.

[00:26:43]Now, the owner of the house has come out and said that the landscaping was included in the rent. So, that's still going to be hard to explain why they needed a chainsaw or two chainsaws. Um, but David could say, "I needed it for a music video." He could. Now, is that true that he needed it for a music video? No. But remember, what is the standard? The standard is David is innocent until proven guilty. And the burden is not on David to prove himself innocent. The burden is on the state to prove David did it. And if David can poke all these holes, and I don't think that a lot of these other arguments that we've talked about today are very strong. But I definitely think they're going to be able if there better not be a Victoria Mendes. That's the thing. If there is in fact an indeed a real life living person named Victoria Mendes and she was in any way associated with being in the staff associated with David's house, this is going to be the easiest thing for them to say David didn't buy that stuff. Now, if there's no Victoria Mendes, if there that person doesn't exist, it's just a madeup fake name or there are obviously there are Victoria Mendes, I'm sure, out in the world somewhere. But like, if that person if there's no connection to any Victoria Mendes to David, why did she have his Amazon card? Because here's the thing.

[00:27:53]I've bought stuff on Amazon before as a gift and I'll send it to like, you know, my mom's address or my grandma's address and I'll put her name on it. it'll say, you know, my grandma's name or whatever.

[00:28:05]And okay, fine. Like, you can send something to a different name using your Amazon account. But in this particular situation, we don't really know. So, they better hope there's no real Victoria Mendes out there because the prosecution is going to have a hard time proving David logged in there >> in the judicial system where people who look like you, Gideon, went to prison for something they did not do.

[00:28:28]uh went to prison and was murdered for something they did not do. Whistling at a white woman. Um drug charges.

[00:28:36]>> But you know the you know you know you know the thing about those though is that the reason why we can look back and prove that those people were innocent is because evidence was ignored. We could tell racist jury was selected. All of that. At least right now, albeit we haven't went to trial yet. Right now, what we're seeing is it it's it's da da da da da. It's not we're not seeing no discrepancies. We're seeing this this is very black and white.

[00:29:06]>> What do you think those people at that time saw at the time of those, you know, people who look like you were convicted for something they didn't do? They all saw the same thing. He did it. No, you just said earlier, you literally just said earlier that those people, those jurors, racist jurors, they have in their mind something happened to them or they just have in their mind they don't like somebody that doesn't matter what they hear, I'm going to get you. That's what you said earlier.

[00:29:31]>> Oh, I did.

[00:29:33]>> So, so you're now you're saying that they saw it as da da da da when you just said earlier like no, when you when the juror has in their mind that they want to get you, they're going to get you.

[00:29:45]>> It could be both. You can have that where the jury doesn't like you or and that's if evidence is great, good or bad, evidence is great, they can still convict you. Okay, that's one. But the other factor is the evidence that we're allegedly looking at right now to be like it's him when there is no You showed me all these things, right? This law and crime sidebar with Jesse Weber.

[00:30:10]You showed me all that, but there's no there's it was silent to the investigation of somebody else.

[00:30:16]Everything is focused on this guy. What about anybody else?

[00:30:19]>> Well, also he didn't um the prosecutors didn't say what their investigation has been. And I do hope you know what um Jail is saying. I do hope that prosecutors do come out and they do show the parents couldn't have done it because this this this cousin couldn't have done it because that Neo wasn't involved because this Asia wasn't involved because that like I do hope they do come out and show that they actually did look into other people because the thing about it is to get justice for Celeste. We actually have to make sure the person who killed her and did these things to her goes to jail or prison rather or you know even you know worse eventually whatever the case may be. But like we actually like it is true. We can't just like say, "Oh, look.

[00:31:03]Let's oh, it's that guy. We don't have any evidence. Put him under the jail.

[00:31:07]That's why we have trials. That's why we have trials." But I think this guy is so off-putting because it doesn't feel to me like he's really operating in good faith. Like he won't concede on any points. He's just like, "Oh, well then we don't know where what that evidence is. We got to keep that evidence out."

[00:31:25]Okay.

[00:31:26]I can't tell who's driving that car. of anybody is the truth.

[00:31:30]>> Am I lying chat?

[00:31:35]>> There could be more >> on tour at the end of July. So Steve Fiser shared the surveillance video.

[00:31:42]>> So you say there's just A GHOST IN ELON WENT rogue and drove himself.

[00:31:47]>> I don't see a human being driving that car. Gon, do you am I looking at the same thing you're looking at? Are we looking at this?

[00:31:54]>> Has had enough.

[00:31:56]>> He's done. He's like, you know what? I I I cannot. He's laughing >> like I don't see David. I don't I don't see a human being, dude.

[00:32:03]>> It's real evidence. It's not that compelling to me. It shows the car >> after the hearing on X report showing the Tesla one of the last times it was driven. It's believed that Celeste dismembered remains were inside that front trunk. And the list of potential evidence continues. Quote, DNA evidence developed from blood stains collected from defendants.

[00:32:22]>> I listen, I'm not saying it's a selfdriving car at all. I'm not saying it's a self-driving murderous car. What I'm saying is if we're being honest and if we're being aligned with the truth, my eyes, I can't see what or who is driving that car. I just can't. It's not like, "Oh, yep. Got him. That's David."

[00:32:44]Now, what we can tell is the car was moved. The car was moved on that day.

[00:32:48]Someone moved the car or no one moved the car, but the car got moved. So, that's something. I mean, you've already made a lot of room for reasonable doubt.

[00:32:57]So, are you expecting his defense team to argue some of these same things that you are?

[00:33:02]>> No.

[00:33:03]>> Here's the thing. Like, there's very few things he said that actually create reasonable doubt to me. All he has done is offered alternative theories of the case and asked why why um David is being targeted. He has made assumptions that none of us know if that's true or not.

[00:33:23]He's made assumptions. He said, "Why wasn't there an investigation into anyone else?" Well, there might have been. We don't know. He said, instead of saying, "If there was no investigation into anyone else, then that's when I would start to ask questions." No, he said that he just assumed it. He assumed David was being extorted. He assumed that it was an internship. These are all just things he just pulled out of nowhere. He hasn't really created any room for reasonable doubt. He has no evidence for anything he's saying either. So, while he likes to be Mr. attack the evidence, which he should.

[00:33:51]There should be evidence for crimes. I'm not disagreeing with that. He don't have no evidence himself. He's just offering alternative possibilities. I don't really think he really did create a lot of reasonable doubt. Now, if the prosecutors, for example, don't have evidence to back their claims up. If they just got a psychic vision from the mothership that Celeste went into that house, that's when he would be able to create reasonable doubt or someone like him would be able to create reasonable doubt. But if the prosecutor has body camera footage, for example, of David being told she's 14, and then they also have video evidence of him on a date after that having relations with Celeste, that's it. There's no more reasonable doubt needed. Maybe they could say he was he was drugged. They could say that wasn't him. But if it came off his iCloud and it's got the same, you know, deformity on the mole or the whatever, you know, like I don't really think he's created that much reasonable doubt. I definitely think he's done a great job advertising his services.

[00:34:49]>> We're gonna see if his defense because one thing Jay said that I have to agree with is it only matters in that court.

[00:35:00]>> The only thing that matters really is what happens in that courtroom. And Jay almost said that himself. All the stuff that he went on there and yapped about yesterday is also doesn't matter. That's why he wants to get in that courtroom because then it would matter. But until or unless that happens, it doesn't matter what he said either.

[00:35:22]Does the prosecution have evidence that beyond a reasonable doubt that David Anthony Burke willingly, knowingly participated in an ongoing su relation?

[00:35:34]I'm calling it that, but I do know that that's not the, you know, word. I'm calling it that for purposes where we are. Does the prosecution have enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to prove that David was engaged in a continuous blank blank relation with Celeste? Yes or no? If yes, he's guilty.

[00:35:55]If he gets found to be guilty of a continuous SU relation with someone under the age of 13, it kind of stops mattering as much if he mutilated a body. Okay, but that's a whole another charge. So, the second charge, the question is yes or no. And does the prosecution have enough evidence? It is the evidence going to make it in that David murdered Celeste. That's their hardest thing to prove and it's going to be even harder to prove if they're going to do this whole death penalty song and dance, which could be a reason for them strategically not to go for it. But do they have the evidence that he murdered Celeste? It seems like they have a lot of evidence and it seems like they were waiting to make this arrest for a long time because they were waiting to get the evidence. If I had to guess, they probably got him on a wire tap saying something. Number three, yes or no. Does the prosecution and will the prosecution rather have enough evidence to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that David mutilated a corpse? Yes or no?

[00:36:50]Nothing else matters.

[00:36:52]Was Celeste extorting him? If she was, let's say she was, doesn't that only just give David even more motive to murder her? So, even if they are able to make her look like she was some scam and scheming little 13-year-old extorter, well, there you go. You just duped your own you played your own damn self cuz you just gave a whole another motive to kill her.

[00:37:16]>> You know, I I am happy that we could get a criminal defense lawyer's opinion on this. We see now how I'm not going to lie, I think that his defense is going to use some of these tactics. So, this is going to prepare a lot of us for the future, man. So, this is EDP Watch Nation and Joma, I appreciate your time, man. Uh, I know you're lying your ass off right now, but you know, I do appreciate your time.

[00:37:46]>> I never lie.

[00:37:49]>> Neon did not do it. It was me. All right. Peace out.

[00:37:52]>> He's confessing.

[00:37:53]>> He doesn't mean that. That's not a confess, >> man.

[00:38:03]Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow.

[00:38:06]But you know, the crazy thing is is like I saw my chat go from us being in unison like David's guilty as hell to where I literally saw people genuinely changing their mind. Like I I saw it while we were on stream today, man. You guys probably saw it in here, but like I'm LIKE I KNOW I SAW SOME PEOPLE mad that like I had him on and everything and stuff like that. And to anybody that was mad, bro, like if you're like listen listen IF YOU WERE MAD AT WHAT he was saying on my stream, imagine how mad you're going to be when this goes to trial and it's going to be televised.

[00:38:47]>> That's why I did this video >> and you see how his defense lawyers work.

[00:38:50]>> This is how it works. You >> feel me?

[00:38:51]>> It's It sucks. It sad, BUT THAT'S HOW >> YOU THINK YOU'RE MAD NOW. WAIT TILL YOU see this genuinely in action to where >> you know this is for all the Marvels.

[00:39:04]We're going to really see >> and they're going to be making David seem like this poor innocent kid that got sucked in by the industry and didn't have anyone on his side and he was all alone and he was just this young naive church boy and he was just going praying and and this little city girl was Jezebel. I mean, oh my god, it's going to be so bad. I can't even imagine what they're going to do because my mind don't think like that, but theirs does.

[00:39:30]But yeah, so I have been on here for 5 and 1/2 hours again on a Saturday. So it's 7:00 at night. I'm going to go uh and I'll see y'all soon. Facts ain't defamation. Neither are opinions. And everyone, including David, is innocent until proven guilty. Please do not send any hate to anybody I mentioned in this video. This video is meant to report on matters of public concern and give my opinion. This is not legal advice. If you find yourself in need of legal advice, please do go consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. I am not your lawyer. Love you, Mina. Okay, bye.