The defendant’s attempt to use pseudo-legal jargon is a hollow display of intellectual vanity that fails the moment it meets actual law. The judge’s swift dismissal serves as a necessary reality check for those who mistake fringe theories for genuine legal knowledge.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Cocky Sovereign Citizen Claims “I’m a Foreign National” — Judge SHUTS Him Down InstantlyAdded:
Today, we're going to step inside a courtroom, where things already feel off before they even begin. The judge opens by questioning the defendant's ability to represent himself, which is never a great sign. You can sense hesitation, structure, and control from the bench, while the defendant is just about to step into uncertain territory. This moment quietly sets the tone. Something unusual is coming. It's only seconds away from unfolding. We're moving on to the 3:30 docket at 4:00.
So, maybe I'll play a little catch-up.
One point, we were hour behind.
4:00 case of Country Metals Apartments versus Tariq Sumar, I'm sorry, Sumar Tariq Ade and Erica Witherspoon. Case number 23C0276.
Good afternoon again, Your Honor.
Christopher Borkin for the plaintiff.
Um, where's my motion?
Oh, I see it. There we are. All right.
So, first of all, there was Mr. Ade, could you please state your name, sir?
Uh, I'm Tariq Sumar Tariq Ade. Thank you, sir.
All right. So, first of all, the court had adjourned this because I had some concerns about Mr. Tariq Ade's capacity to be able to uh represent himself in this particular case. I do not find authority for the court to refer in a civil matter.
So, therefore, we'll have to address this matter like any other normal matter.
>> [clears throat] >> Uh, Mr. Borkin, did you receive Mr. Ade's uh motion?
I did, Your Honor. He emailed it to me following the hearing.
All right.
Mr. Ade, at this time, you can go ahead and argue your motion.
Uh, the motion is that uh making an in rem um claim against the property uh the alleged property um 251 uh 302 uh Stevens Drive.
Um, I like I said, I sent my affidavits to you uh that have not been addressed, as well as the affidavit to the plaintiff that uh has not been addressed. And I'm just here to see if uh uh the plaintiff is going to um rebut any of the claims that were made within the the correspondence.
Thank you.
Mr. Borkin.
I Your Honor, I would um respond to this motion by saying that it has no basis in Michigan law um landlord-tenant law.
Um, it's not within this uh the court's jurisdiction uh to grant the relief that he's asking.
Um What jurisdiction?
claims that he's bringing.
Um Mr. Ade, I I didn't interrupt you, and I'd ask that you grant me the same courtesy.
Um, Your Honor, I ask you to deny the um the motion and uh set this trial I set this either for trial or be prepared to to take testimonies of final trial issue.
Okay.
Mr. Ade, is there anything you would like to say? Uh, yeah, I was attempting to keep this uh private because I don't want to cause any uh confusion out there. Um, but I had did send you a document in your ex officio capacity placing you as a fiduciary um to this case and account uh and which was not uh answered. So, uh a notice of uh fault was sent uh stating that you agreed to the um claims uh within the initial uh executive order.
Um, or excuse me, um affidavit high prerogative uh writ of quo warranto uh to um take over the uh assets of the case to charge it off to the plaintiff um but as I've sent the response to the plaintiff, if the plaintiff is not prepared to address the response as it was stated to the plaintiff that they had until today um to address all of uh which was um requested uh to be addressed uh in the response um or in the correspondence to the plaintiff. Uh if they weren't prepared to answer all those today, then the case would be dismissed um and the account would be uh satisfied.
All right. So, my ruling on the motion is exactly what Mr. Borkin said. Um, first of all, I don't have any jurisdiction over whatever issues you're bringing up because those are not actual issues. Secondly, that's not an actual motion. There is no basis for the motions that you filed in the law uh as we are exist in the >> Objection.
Sir, if you object again while I'm talking, you're going to get held in contempt. Do you understand?
Uh, I don't understand what you're saying. I'm trying to uh I understand that the court doesn't have jurisdiction because it's the property >> there's nothing that you have said that is even a real motion, sir. The motion is denied.
It's a ex affidavit. It's uh not a motion. All right. I'm going to schedule this for a hearing, at which time, sir, I advise you once again to go seek legal counsel. It appears you didn't do that at all.
And then, um I'm going to schedule it on the 24th. Um, do Are you available, Mr. Borkin, on the 24th? I would be, Your Honor.
Uh, I would not be available.
Then, if you don't show up to court on that day, sir, the motion hearing will be held without you.
Uh, according to um the judicial code of conduct, you're supposed to extend. I'm not a United States citizen. I'm a foreign uh national. And uh I'm here under my nation's uh constitution uh laws and bylaws. I'm only here to uh settle the matters uh at hand. Um, this is dealing with trust property. The property in question has been conveyed uh to the Tariq Sumar Tariq Ade living trust as long as uh along with the um personal information of the alleged defendants um which is now being used uh in the public uh without just compensation for um the use of that private property. Uh, a promissory note was signed. Uh the lease was signed. Um, but full disclosure was not given that uh what was taking place was a a consumer credit transaction. And cash is not a a necessity to satisfy uh a consumer credit transaction. But with it even being a consumer credit transaction, full disclosure wasn't wasn't stated that the lease and the private property of the signature of the alleged defendants uh would be used to securitize um that lease and uh which uh by itself um destroys the the or separates um the lease uh which is the bill and uh the security which is the the signature cuz without us um the reason why you don't have subject matter is because we give the subject which is the property uh we make it matter uh as we were the ones to uh sign uh a consumer credit transaction.
Um, but we weren't offered the remedy of uh not having um excuse me, not having uh full disclosure. Um, with any contract, full disclosure is a must, and we weren't granted that uh along with um the other issues that uh brought this even this whole account up, you know, within the public. Um So, uh if we need to address it at a later date, uh I would uh say no because I have already brought forth my claim, and my claim has not yet been uh rebutted. Uh to say that what I have to say as a national or foreign national um is not uh recognized by you is dismissive, and that's religious discrimination cuz all I'm doing is uh uh what Article 1 of the United States Constitution says it gives me a a right to uh perform my religion or religious execution. Uh I have the right to to to religious freedoms, in which you're stating that you're trying to or your statements have been uh dismissive towards uh my religious freedoms, which would be discrimination on your part. And I know that's not what you're attempting to do. Um, but that's what is being done. And uh along with uh the discrepancies with the plaintiff.
And all I'm here to do, ma'am, um I understand what uh what you asked. I didn't understand what you asked our previous date of stating that you felt I was incompetent or that I didn't understand uh the procedures that were taking place. Um, I just wanted to be private as I didn't want to cause confusion amongst the masses out here because I'm not a United States citizen like most of the people on this call.
I'm a foreign national, and I come under the laws of my country and under my nation and under my constitution along with international law such as the United uh Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as along with the American declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, which give us the right to self-government, self-determination, and self- autonomy.
>> Mr. Day, you've talked >> Yes, ma'am. I will see you on March 24th, 2023 at 3:30.
Is this uh excuse me, what is the type of uh type of uh case this will be? This is where everything reaches its peak. The judge firmly denies the motion and doesn't hold back, making it clear none of this holds legal weight. A direct warning about contempt raises the stakes instantly, but the defendant pushes even further, claiming foreign national status and shifting into constitutional and religious territory. The courtroom dynamic flips into full control mode as the judge cuts through the noise and reasserts authority, bringing a powerful and decisive close. Make sure you like the video, subscribe to the channel, and we'll see you in the next video.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











