A three-judge district court panel ruled that Alabama could not eliminate a second Black-opportunity congressional seat because the state's preferred map intentionally discriminated based on race, blocking the state's attempt to dilute minority voters' voting power despite the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision requiring intentional race discrimination to prove Voting Rights Act violations.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Court blocks Alabama voting map that would help Republicans in midterms追加:
Court blocks Alabama voting map that would help Republicans in the midterms.
Huffpost is reporting a three judge district court panel on Tuesday ruled that Alabama could not eliminate a second black opportunity congressional seat that the panel previously ordered to be drawn as the state's preferred map intentionally discriminated based on race. Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination, the decision states. And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the secretary to continue using this court's race map will not disrupt Alabama's elections. The same district court panel required Alabama to draw a map with a second house district in 2022 that provided black voters an opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice. In 2023, the Supreme Court upheld this ruling in a 5 to4 decision in Allen v. Milligan. Alabama refused to abide by this decision and the panel ordered the adoption of a map with one black majority seat and one black plurality seat. After the Supreme Court almost completely gutted the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v Cala on April 29th, it required the panel to reconsider the case given the Cala requirement that the Voting Rights Act challenges can only succeed when intentional race discrimination is found. Alabama responded by passing a bill suspending its May 19th primaries and reinstituting the map that the panel previously overturned in 2023.
We reject in the strongest possible terms the state's attempt to finish its intentional decision to dilute minority voters with a veneer of legislative regularity. The panel's decision states.
That's what we know for now from the Pepio newsroom. I'm David Moore.
関連おすすめ
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
Russia Clashes With Romania, U.S. And EU At Security Council Meeting | DWS News | AC1F
dwsofficial
344 views•2026-06-02
Independence Calendar (Episode #25) - With Cory Morgan & Keith Wilson
JohnBoltonAB
3K views•2026-05-31
BREAKING: TRUMP ADMITS HE LIED ON CIA
DarrenMonroePolitics
10K views•2026-06-01
Why Reynosa Is Burning Now: The Truth Explained
THEFACTFACTORYF
560 views•2026-05-30
भिंत #rohitpawar#sharadpawar#ajitpawar#supriyasule#baramati #supriyasulefc#baramatikar#ncp#ncpsp
Aapla_Maharashtraa
9K views•2026-06-02
Bengal News | Another TMC MP Attacked In Bengal A Day After Assault On Abhishek Banerjee
NDTV
80K views•2026-05-31
Karnataka's Biggest Leadership Shift! What Changes Under DK Shivakumar? | South Central | ET Now
ETNow
205 views•2026-06-01











