In Chile, self-defense is an exemption from criminal liability requiring three simultaneous requirements: unlawful aggression, rational necessity of means employed, and lack of sufficient provocation; privileged self-defense automatically applies in home defense and robbery with violence scenarios, and the law presumes self-defense without strict compliance in these situations. The case of former Constitutional Court Minister Iván Aróstica's home attack illustrates how Chile's justice system may show permissiveness toward criminals, including minors, while the speaker argues that effective security requires anticipation, intelligence work, and equal application of law regardless of perpetrator age or status.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
CHILE EN ALERTA ... USO DE ARMAS INSCRITAS Y LA LEGITIMA DEFENSA ...Added:
[music] [bell] [music] [bell] [music] [music] [music] [music] Hello friends, how are you? Welcome to the Strategic Defense Security channel.
Thank you for joining me for this broadcast today, May 22, 2026.
Thank you to those who connected to the chat and are gradually connecting to the broadcast. Thank you to those who are watching us live and also thank you to those who will watch us later. Those who are new, as always, subscribe to the channel, like and share our videos.
Dear friends, the news of the day, of course, is the attack, right? The raid they did on the house of the Minister of the Constitutional Court, right, Mr. Orosco, or excuse me? Uh, regarding the attack, I mean, well said, well said, Minister Aróstica, another voice, Aróstica, right? who was assaulted in his home by a mob that traveled in three vehicles and that upon entering his home they entered with firearms and one of them was a semi-automatic weapon, that is, a weapon of war with a lot of high firepower.
And here come the facts in which the former minister Aróstica defends himself and uses a firearm legally registered and authorized to be operated in his home. He repels the assault and takes down one of the criminal assailants. They are not potential victims, they are not assailants, they are criminals and they are bad.
People need to understand that. Don't downplay it. Don't downplay it, journalists. Don't downplay it, those at the Ministry of Justice, right?
Don't downplay it. They are bad, they are bandits, they are delinquents and they are criminals.
They entered armed, they shot, they wounded, yes, former minister Aróstica and his son as well.
Therefore, they are not innocent.
So let's stop using certain terms to downplay what's happening. Those who arrived were criminals, I don't care how old they were, they were criminals. There was even one who was 11 years old. 11 years old. Do you remember that I told you that for me the one who died was at least 14 years old, but there was also an 11-year-old delinquent and that needs to be said loud and clear, delinquent. Don't tell me, "They're just kids, we have to give them another one." They released the 11-year-old. No, he has to go to jail anyway, because at 11 years old, at 10 years old, when you pick up a firearm or a knife and you're going to hurt someone, you know what you're doing. Don't come at me with stories about not having a clue, not having reasoning skills, or anything. They are criminals at that age.
Very sorry. I don't give a damn what they say about the words I'm saying, but to me they are criminals. I do n't know what you all think. What are people saying in the chat? What can you say about that? If a person, an 11-year-old, a 14-year-old, and other minors are carrying firearms, including combat weapons, and shooting at people, at potential victims, these are people who are not thinking about what they are doing.
Excuse me, are you clear about what you're doing?
But a question comes to mind, and we'll be talking about it throughout the program. That's why Chile must be on alert.
And you know, the question that comes to mind is that while the procedure was being carried out and the people and the deceased were being detained, right? And the others who were injured, the criminals, were not children, criminals, minors they would be, but they are criminals.
And I will repeat it as many times as necessary.
What caught our attention was that the mother arrived at the scene.
How did the mother know what her children were up to? How did he know the address?
How did the mother arrive immediately?
Interesting, isn't it?
What do you think, dear chat friends?
Because it catches my attention if there's a robbery, a mob where several people are involved, where a criminal ends up dead, a 14-year-old criminal, a delinquent, a criminal.
Okay. It's not that by chance he found himself in that place and had the bad luck that a weapon just fell into his hands and he, I don't know, well, uh, uh, Satan attacked him, entered his body and wanted to enter the house. Don't give me any of that nonsense.
The question is, why was the mother right there at the scene of the crime? arrive. Leave my son alone.
I think there's something strange going on there, don't you? To say the least.
To say the least.
From my humble point of view, and based on my limited knowledge, what I 've seen in other countries, and especially how the United States would handle the situation, I think... In the United States, none would have survived.
Fortunately, the former minister only had a handgun. I say fortunately because in Chile one cannot have a weaponry with greater firepower.
Perhaps if this had happened in the United States or had happened to me at my home, it would have been a different story because we are authorized in the United States to have weapons of war without any problem and it wouldn't have been just a couple of shots. I think that would have been a couple of well-placed bursts of fire from him, right? with an AR15 and another scenario would have been presented there in response to that assault.
In fact, having weapons in your home is the only way to contain crime. And don't tell me, Claudio Orrego, that later, of course, the governor of Santiago came out saying that he was against it, right? to the fact that civilians have firearms in their homes. He says this because the communist, the progressive leftist, wants to keep the population unarmed so that they can control and abuse them.
It's clear, it's obvious.
In every country where the left arrives, where progressives arrive, where Lerinist Marxists arrive, the first thing they do is try to disarm the population so that they cannot defend themselves.
So it doesn't cause me any admiration that Governor Orrego made those comments.
Here it's clearly established what constitutes self-defense, although it says something like, "No, it's about proportionality, what proportionality? What are you talking about? It's my home. And don't tell me that if someone breaks into my home, I have to wait and see if they're armed or not, if they have a knife, a stick, a gun, or a machine gun.
The moment they violate my home, they have to face the consequences, I think. I'm truly amazed, to put it mildly, at how the judicial system works in Chile, because we also saw this morning, right?, a mother being run over while she was with her child in a stroller, crossing a pedestrian crossing. A vehicle came along and hit her, and the driver didn't offer assistance and fled the scene.
Later, a motorcyclist followed the vehicle, forced it to stop, reported the incident, and both the municipal police and the Carabineros (Chilean police) managed to arrest the driver who had fled. He fled, they took him to court, and the courts let him go, even though the driver's vehicle had expired documents, he had a ton of tickets for not paying them, and on top of that, he fled without helping the victim. The law clearly states that if you flee and do n't help the victim, you face a 700,000 peso fine and five years and one day in jail, if the court so decides, right? They let the guy go free. Let him go, let him go. That's how justice works. That's the justice we have in Chile.
I mean, I'm asking myself, as an ordinary citizen, dear friends, why there are things I see that aren't working as they should.
These individuals who entered the former minister's house were all armed and didn't hesitate to shoot.
And on top of that, the courts let the youngest of them, who was 11 years old, go free. They ca n't be free because they are criminals, no matter their age. You ca n't let them go. Go away, son. Not you, poor little angel, no, poor thing.
Not the man, the little boy had no idea what he was doing. They're bad. We know, and they have to somehow know that what they're doing is wrong. They can't let him go free. Send him to a juvenile detention center. Leave him somewhere where they know what he did was wrong.
What do you all think in the chat, friends?
I'm saying things that aren't appropriate, I don't know. Or maybe I'm driven by anger, I'm driven by, I don't know, because I come from a place where justice is applied differently.
You know what I see in Chile? A lot of permissiveness.
A lot of permissiveness. The interpretation of the laws is a mess.
Everyone interprets it however they want. Every judge does what they want. Nobody says anything to anybody. There's nobody to bell the cat. A judge invents laws, invents trials, invents legal fictions to arrest someone. They ratify it in the courts, the ministers ratify it. The Supreme Court also ratifies something that is wrong. There's no one to tell them, "Hey, cut the scandal, stop the scandal."
Fortunately, and I say this with all due respect to the former minister, fortunately, the former minister realized how things work.
That's how things work in Chile. Those are the criminals, regardless of their age, because they are criminals.
So, to the minister's family, my respect, right? In these difficult times they are going through, but let this serve to bring about stricter laws, to review the laws, to change the procedures, and to ensure that people who carry weapons, regardless of their age, are treated as criminals.
What does self-defense say in Chile? Because we are talking about Chile. Self-defense in Chile states that self-defense is an exemption from criminal liability.
For it to be legitimate and legal, you must meet three basic simultaneous requirements established in the article Article 10, sorry, of the Penal Code.
What are these three grounds?
Unlawful aggression. There must be a real, current, or imminent attack against you, your family, or your property.
Rational necessity of the means employed.
The defense must be proportional to stop or repel the attack. And that's where I disagree. It can't be proportional if the assailant enters with a knife, with a machete, because they're used to it, the criminal is used to handling knives.
If the person there isn't used to handling bladed weapons, how are they going to defend themselves proportionally with a bladed weapon?
Rational necessity of the means employed. Look, tell me how you interpret that. The defense must be proportional to stop or repel the attack. It doesn't require equality of weapon, but rather that your reaction be appropriate and not exceed what is strictly necessary. Damn, if I see that they're going to kill me, that they're going to harm my family or me, I'm not going to think twice. And if I have a I'm going to shoot him with a shotgun. And if I have a pistol, I'm going to shoot him a couple of times. Simple.
Unfortunately, that's how it is. When you're in a situation like that, you do n't think about your life, you think about the lives of your loved ones, you don't think that the poor little criminal is carrying some emotional burden, I don't know what, because of who knows how much, because when he was a kid they gave him donkey milk or something.
No, let's cut the crap.
Lack of sufficient provocation.
You must not have started or provoked the fight or aggression, right? Because otherwise it's not considered self-defense. If they break into my house, I'm not provoking anything, right, not making any provocation to the dear Mr. Criminal.
Privileged self-defense.
And here's something else that's interesting.
The law automatically applies and presumes that you are acting in self- defense without needing to strictly comply with the three previous requirements in the following situations. And here's where it gets interesting, home defense, so you know, dear friends, because we have the right to have legally registered firearms in our homes. that we pass the corresponding psychological checks and that we can practice at a shooting range so that we have, right, the necessary skills to use the weapons and that if someone breaks into our house, well, let's see, home defense, what does it say?
It repels illegal entry into your house, apartment, office, commercial or industrial premises or its dependencies when there is climbing over roofs or walls or with the breaking of doors and windows.
Keep in mind that the weapon must be legally registered at the location and must be used by the person who has that weapon registered.
If the weapon belongs to your uncle, your father, you can't use it.
If it's not registered there and it's registered to your business, but you just happened to take it to your house, you're committing a crime. The crime, right, because you didn't notify anyone that you were, right, transporting the weapon, and if you used it and it's not registered in your name, you're committing a crime because you're not authorized to use that weapon. It's clear. There's also self-defense. Privileged self-defense occurs when a robbery with violence takes place, when you defend yourself to prevent or repel a robbery committed with force or intimidation against you and your family. That's clear. The minister acted according to the law; therefore, he killed the criminal.
Unfortunately, he happened to be in the path of a bullet. He had no other option there, so I'm sorry.
That's essentially what constitutes privileged self-defense.
All the elements were present in the case of the mob attack at the former minister's house. Of course, the circumstances were present.
But I'm still wondering why the mother arrived at the scene so quickly to demand her son's release.
Hmm.
Something doesn't add up, and something smells fishy.
But anyway, let's see. For those who didn't see the news, those who don't want to see it, right, on broadcast television, this was the news story we were watching, right? This morning and at midday.
Let's see what the news is about, dear friends, to continue Speaking of the topic. I want you to share your opinions in the chat because this is important, and also leave your comments below the video because this topic is important. This topic is extremely sensitive and extremely important.
Minute 6:32 AM.
The tense fog persists in the capital, but there's more breaking news to review with Julio Gumada. Julio, go ahead.
Good morning.
Breaking news.
Yes, how are you, Gonzalo? Good morning.
Low temperatures, but that doesn't diminish the emergency situation in the area where we are in the San Miguel district.
We're going to show you the work that the Investigations Police are currently doing. We're in Gaspar Banda, near Arcángel, where a violent mob incident occurred in the early hours of the morning. We can now confirm one fatality, and it appears to be one of the criminals who entered this area. Before we get to the story, let's also mention who the victim of this incident is. We're talking about the former Minister of the Constitutional Court, Iván Aróstica was inside his home, accompanied by one of his sons, when at least four individuals reportedly entered the premises. It is said that they were armed, or at least carrying a firearm, and threatened the family members with the intention of stealing various belongings. It is unknown at this time if any information or background has been gathered, at least from the individuals, but they quickly entered the property. The former Minister of the Constitutional Court responded by using his legally registered personal firearm. He then fired several shots at the intruders. It is still unconfirmed whether or not there was an exchange of gunfire, but two of them were wounded and a third died inside the house. For this reason, the police investigation tent is currently on site, conducting forensic examinations of the victim's body. We were referring to four individuals, but at least six people have been confirmed as detained. This is all because some members of the gang escaped from this location, fleeing in other vehicles. At least, the information we have so far indicates they were traveling in two cars. And here's a relevant, striking, even anecdotal detail in the story: At the very moment the Carabineros (police) and emergency teams were notified, given the injuries, including those of the victims, a woman— a third person in this story—arrived.
She identified herself as the mother of one of the injured, one of the criminals, and had a sort of altercation, a struggle, with the SAMU (Emergency Medical Service) personnel and municipal officials, trying to get her son out of the ambulance. After this, she left, heading east, towards Gran Avenida, and was followed by municipal personnel. There they found two vehicles.
This woman tried to get into one of them.
They noticed the presence of the municipal staff. The municipal vehicle and the cars escaped from this area, at least one of them.
The second one, the one located a little further along the scene of the crime here in the Gaspar Banda area, had two people inside, who also appear to be criminals.
Absolutely clear. I have no more doubts. If the woman was in vehicles that were nearby, she was also involved, right?
In this robbery, it's a matter of putting things together; otherwise, they don't happen by chance. The mother of one of the criminals was involved in this. How was she involved, and why were the vehicles so close to where the robbery was taking place?
So, I hope they arrested her, and I also hope they arrested all the individuals involved. But the mother seemed strange to me; she's involved, I have no doubt about it, I think. I hope I'm not wrong. She was part of the gang that had come to this place to carry out the robbery. In other words, there was third-party intervention with the intention, we could say, of rescuing... One of the injured was taken to a medical center, possibly Barros Luco Hospital, as were the other injured people. Regarding the former minister, while Carlos's personnel asked us to leave the area, his son was taken to different medical centers. This is the withdrawal of police personnel, we say, due to the arrival of the forensic medical service to this area.
Let's now review some statements that have been gathered during the last few hours regarding this serious event where we have two injured victims, one deceased criminal, and also two other members of this group who were Zavala in what is presumed to have been an exchange of gunfire.
In this location, a robbery with violence occurred at a residence.
There was indeed a family present.
At least four individuals entered with firearms, and in that context, this crime began. There were signs of forced entry at the residence, and in this scenario, the victims repelled the attack with duly registered firearms. In this case, there are six detainees; three are minors. Indeed, one person has died, and investigative procedures are underway to establish their identity.
Breaking news.
Most of the advertising campaigns you do, dear friends, there's the news, but let's pause this for a moment. Okay, there we are.
So, I have nothing more to say than that there was indeed a robbery, an attempted robbery with violence. They forced the door, and inside, they shot at the person who is providing the information. It makes me laugh because supposedly they are journalists.
They say, "We don't know about that exchange of gunfire." So, the minister and his son were injured because the bullet went around the corner and came back. Those who shot the minister are reporting that the minister was shot, his son too, and he's saying, "We don't know if there was an exchange of gunfire."
Well, these things happen, but let's listen more carefully. I'm not saying this is a serious situation that affected this former member of the Constitutional Court in the San Miguel district, without stigmatizing anyone.
They are facing a problem.
Important. Um, practically once a week, we've reported on intellectual events that occurred in that district, and it's striking, Julio, the characteristics of this foiled robbery where self-defense could be established since one of the criminals was killed. There are two injured, and also explain a little more about the context. A mother of one of the detainees arrived to try to save him from the situation.
Police officer.
That's how the story is being understood, Gonzalo, especially in that aspect, which is very striking within the narrative. Um, first of all, let's talk about self-defense because that aspect is being studied precisely to understand if there was one. First, we have to corroborate whether or not there was an exchange of gunfire because there are also injuries on the part of the victims. In fact, the former Minister of the Constitutional Court has already returned after contracting.
Dear friend, is this journalist stupid or what? They've been saying for a while that Bala was injured, the former minister, that his son was injured, and he's saying, "We have to verify "If there was even an exchange of gunfire." But, do you realize that or not? Good grief.
Okay, let's listen more closely.
Injuries. We understand, then, that these are minor injuries. Her son has not yet been discharged. He was taken to a medical center in the metropolitan region. Uh, apparently with some more serious injuries. Uh, we're talking about the possibility of self-defense, given that it's said the criminals were also carrying a firearm.
Now, the mother's story is what's most surprising because we understand that with the crime committed or thwarted, with the shots fired by the former minister, with the shots fired throughout this incident in the San Miguel district, there could have been time for the emergency teams to arrive and for the relatives of those detained, of those involved in the gang, to communicate with their family members. That's when this woman arrives, just when the emergency teams were there and just when her supposed son was being put into the ambulance in the San Miguel district to be taken, possibly, to the hospital. Barluco was rushed to the hospital, as he had a gunshot wound resulting from the incident inside.
A dispute arose; a fight broke out, an argument ensued. He was not allowed to get into the ambulance, nor was the injured person allowed to leave, and he left, walking along Arcángel Street to a vehicle.
Municipal personnel found two other people in that vehicle. But note, there was a second car, and that second car managed to escape upon the arrival of municipal personnel. In other words, it was almost as if there was an attempt to rescue members of the gang who had been wounded at this location and who were precisely in this area to receive medical attention and subsequently be detained. Let's review the statements given by PDI (Chilean Investigative Police) personnel regarding the ongoing procedure, which includes the collection of various pieces of evidence. Despite the arrival at the forensic medical service, some examinations are still being carried out inside the building and on the body of the deceased, who is believed to be one of the criminals.
Indeed, there was an exchange of gunfire, but the exact number of shots fired is unknown. It's not possible to say precisely how many there were. The individual who is deceased at the scene. We are still working, specifically with personnel from the homicide unit, carrying out the scientific work at the crime scene. And regarding his identity, I cannot comment yet. [music] The victims' health is out of danger. One of the victims is already at his home, while the son of this victim is at the Catholic University Clinical Hospital.
They are considered victims.
As victims, but the prosecutor's office has to comment on them.
Of course. There it is. We're going to stop the publicity there for now.
nt. And well, for those who are asking, dear friends, the privileged self-defense in Chile says that the law automatically protects and presumes that you act in self-defense without needing to strictly comply with the three previous requirements that we had made known in the following situations.
Privileged self-defense.
Home defense. Repel illegal entry into your house, apartment, office, business or industrial premises or its dependencies when there is climbing over roofs or walls or with fracture or breakage of doors and windows.
robbery with violence when defending yourself to prevent or repel a crime of robbery with force or intimidation against you or your family. That's where privileged self-defense comes in. But be aware that when you own a firearm, the firearm must be registered in your name and must remain in the place where you registered it, right? The firearm must be operated by you, the person responsible for that firearm, okay? Because if we're not in Chile either, we don't get involved, and that's kind of the idea. But look, we had another development of the news from another channel because we're not necessarily going to stick to just one channel.
Let's see how to deliver the news to another channel, to check its consistency. Let's see here. Let's see, I think this is the one here.
Let's see if this is it. [clears throat] Here's the same news. We're going to put it on, and of course, from another channel that's reporting the news in its own way.
Here is emergency help. Actually, I'm here while this is happening, what's it called? advertising.
But you realized, dear friends, what I was telling you about how journalists deal with the news.
What is the magic prompt for Let's see what happens? And in reality, dear friends, seeing and hearing this situation that occurred this morning, it is clear to us that in Chile, as a result of the soft hand, the permissiveness, the abuse of democracy that previous governments turned into tremendous debauchery, and in addition to debauchery, they turned the system into a degeneration.
As long as there is no real awareness and a deep analysis of what is happening in the country, we are not going to stop this just by carrying out small and isolated operations in one place or another, or by mobilizing 2000 officers across several cities in Chile. That's not how it's solved, that's clear, but they don't want to understand that it's not how it's solved.
Masterminds emerge, but they all make the same mistake and have the same results.
We have been saying for a long time that the serious problem we have in Chile, and there are several, in the area of security, and I can no longer remain silent because with what I have seen, with what I know, with my knowledge, with what I have had to do, it saddens me. It saddens me that in Chile things are not really done as they should be done and continue to be done the old way. They continue to apply the same techniques, the same procedures that don't work, and they try to visit places and try to invite people to tell them how they did this or that, and they continue doing the same thing that has always been done.
As long as there is no profound change in what the judicial power is, as long as our laws are not reviewed, as long as the judiciary, the state, the government, and Congress are not truly aligned. That's because absolutely nothing is going to happen.
Nothing is going to happen, and I'm going to reaffirm here that nothing is going to happen so that the gentlemen, gentlemen of the government, if there is any of them, a deputy, a senator, people who have something to do with what is happening in China, there are things that are obvious, that we have said thousands of times that in the places where it is being applied it is giving results.
Unless the three branches of government unite to implement an effective, efficient, and efficacious security plan, nothing will be achieved.
Until we have the capacity, right?
And good old Tino, from those who administer and dispense justice in Chile so that criminals really pay for what they are doing, nothing is going to happen.
As long as we do not have a prison infrastructure to be able to, of course, keep all those who should be detained for being criminals. Nothing is going to happen.
As long as we keep pecking here, pecking there.
And let's create what I've been saying for a while now, the balloon effect, the security system and the fight against crime, nothing is going to happen and I'm going to repeat it again.
The balloon effect, gentlemen, is when you squeeze, you press the balloon on one side and it inflates on the other.
That means that when you put pressure on a community, a neighborhood, a town, the crime will just go somewhere else because you're only putting pressure on it, but you're not catching the problem, do you understand or not?
And then they're going to go and put pressure on the other side where the balloon was inflated, and the balloon is going to inflate because they're not attacking the problem in general, as a whole. They're doing it wrong. I continue to insist, these procedures, as they are being carried out, have always been done in the same way and have always had the same results. There need to be profound changes at all levels of the state.
When people start, and I'm going to look again, yesterday morning very early, I was interviewed from El Salvador, from the Alfa studios, about a case involving the death of the leader of the Barrio 18 gang, right?
Barrio 18 of El Salvador. I had been studying this type of case for several years because he began his professional career in the United States, in New York. There, right? Barrio 18 had him under control and he was one of the main criminals, and later when he was deported to El Salvador he started and reactivated the system there and began to do his misdeeds there.
Yesterday, the criminal died from several medical problems while in prison.
But the situation of El Salvador is not a miracle that happened overnight. It 's not a miracle.
This was planned long ago in order to carry out the security and territorial control plan.
Therefore, even when situations like the one we've seen occur, when pressure starts from the opposition and also from people within the government asking for things to be done faster, for better results, that's not going to happen because things aren't being done right, and they aren't being done right because they're making mistakes, not with bad intentions, but simply because they don't know what they're doing, because the procedures being carried out no longer fit the current reality, because the new design of the police and military forces also needs to change.
especially the police aspect in Chile.
So, dear friends, when I start watching the news and information comes in—and pay attention to what I'm saying, because this is not a problem of President CAS, it is not a problem of President CAS.
This is deeper than people think.
This goes beyond what people think.
When people use the government of El Salvador as a reference, they do n't realize that to get to where El Salvador is now, two years had to pass beforehand, and there had to be a number of deaths that you can't imagine, and that the last straw, the drop that broke the camel's back in March 2022, was the murder of 84 Salvadoran citizens, and with that, they couldn't take it anymore and requested a total state of emergency, a total state of emergency regime, and activated the security and territorial control plan.
But after 2 years of President Nayibele taking office, hundreds of people had already died.
Now, of course, people see the results, but they didn't see what was happening before.
And I have repeated it 20,000 times, dear friends, when the total disappointment regime began to operate in El Salvador on March 26, 2022, I arrived in El Salvador on April 4 and stayed there for 3 months watching how the plan was implemented.
So, I managed to get to know something, I managed to rescue something.
At that same time, construction was beginning on the mega-prison, the Secot.
Okay.
So, many things were done before crime was brought under control in El Salvador. The most dangerous country in the world, the crime capital, was called El Salvador.
But first, judges had to be dismissed.
Prosecutors had to be dismissed, and public officials who were involved with criminals, drug traffickers, and gang members had to be fired. It was also necessary to arrest businessmen who were involved in these types of illegal situations. A great deal of work had to be done to be able to implement what was the territorial control plan in El Salvador. This didn't happen overnight.
So, when people ask the president, Mr. CAS, to solve the problem of insecurity in Chile in two months, it's impossible, because don't forget that in Chile, Ms. Michelle Bachelet also destroyed, and well, this was coming from before, but she finished destroying everything that was the intelligence apparatus in Chile.
She also begins to call for the disarmament of the Chileans. She's clearing the north so people can get in, right? along our border.
The borders are opening up with the arrival of a lot of illegal immigrants. The other thing follows, of course. Well, no, there are no white doves here either. It continues under Piñera's government and largely under Gabriel Bor's government, so given that scenario, dear friends, do you think President José Antonio Casas is going to do anything in two months? It's not enough. There's a lot to it. That's why the plan has to go ahead, but in a different way, in a different way.
We hope, and I believe, that the new adjustments being made will effectively set things right.
This requires carrying out a series of other actions so that the plans that may be made regarding the security that the country needs, regarding the frontal fight against transnational organized crime, drug trafficking, terrorism and corruption, can be successful.
As long as we don't work on the serious problem of corruption that we have in Chile, we won't be able to move forward.
As long as some people walk free despite having broken the law because they hold positions of power, and those of us who don't have those positions fall apart even for stepping on a fly, the problems will not be solved. Either the law is applied equally to everyone, or we're going to continue with the same problem.
Here, as long as there is permissiveness, as long as there continues to be permissiveness towards criminals, who despite having hundreds of orders, are left to talk freely with only national restrictions. They are not a danger to society.
Until that changes, we're going to continue with the same problem we have. What's needed here is the will of the president.
It is necessary, certainly, that the three branches of government align themselves as one to carry out the plans that may be for the benefit of the majority of citizens, that is, the entire population of Chile.
Dear friends, there are solutions, of course there are, and there are solutions that have been proven. Perhaps what's missing is for them to put them into practice, no matter who falls, that their hand doesn't tremble, that if they are from the same team and they have to fall, let them fall. It 's the only way for things to return to normal.
Because if we persecute our political adversaries and allow people on our team to continue committing atrocities or abusing their power, or people who have power because they are public officials, government officials, judicial officials, or members of Congress, right?
And they think they have carte blanche to do as they please.
We're going to continue with the same problem.
Willpower, Mr. President, a firm hand.
Whoever falls, it doesn't matter if they are close or distant, but even if they are on the same side, if they are committing crimes or breaking the law, they have to pay accordingly.
Equal law is not harsh.
And we have seen in this last week and the week before and this week how certain individuals have privilege, while others have been fired, imprisoned and had to pay fines, others get away scot-free.
That can't be. The whole population is watching you, gentlemen, gentlemen of the government, gentlemen of the Judiciary, gentlemen of Congress, everyone is watching you and they are going to hold you accountable.
Solutions exist.
Commit to doing things the right way.
Speeches and accountability reports and all that stuff are useless. We need to take action. I couldn't care less what journalists think and what they ask because they are another problem we have in this country. They're turning around, right? You know how you are when it comes to supporting the country's progress, the country's development, or when it comes to setting traps and tripping things up.
Either we get our act together and move forward as a team, or we won't be able to get out of this situation.
This is serious. The issues of crime, criminality, drug trafficking, organized crime, and terrorism in Chile are serious. It's not solved by simply announcing security plans, as people in Congress seem to think. And why doesn't he tell us his plan?
And the journalists just parrot the same thing, why don't they reveal the plan? Do you realize? No. You think, you think, dear friends, that it is intelligent to publicize a country's security plan?
Well, what kind of mind can only, and I'm going to repeat this for the third time, as I'm already saying on the channel, security plans can only be made public in a generic way; details cannot be given because they are of a reserved and secret, confidential nature, they are extremely secure, because if that plan is made public, who benefits? the criminal. Well then, think, think for no reason, but for no reason at all.
And I tell you that there are plans in every country, and I think even more so here, although I'm not currently carrying it on hand. The security white papers : where are the strategic plans that are managed internally in countries?
I was in Guatemala, right?
Later, when I was in El Salvador in 2022, and I was, indeed, with the national security agent in Guatemala, and they gave me the Guatemalan security white paper, which is the short, medium, and long-term planning of the security plans that were being carried out in the country, which of course are subject to modification, and the security plan, the white papers of the other countries. There are white papers on a country's defense and there are white papers on a country's national security.
But these matters must be handled confidentially, not because a journalist or journalists come to me and say, " The security plans don't exist because we don't know about them." I'm not interested in them knowing about them. I'll tell you that right now: they have no reason to know.
And in the Chamber of Deputies, I'm not interested in the senators knowing the core of the security plan either.
I'm only interested in them knowing the guidelines of the security plan, nothing more. That's all they need to know. This is the security plan. It consists of so many points. Point one, these two, three, four, five, six, seven, however many they want to add, and there's no further explanation.
Now, the strategy and tactics, that's a different story. Neither journalists nor other authorities should have access to them, only those who are authorized to do so.
The rest need to know that they exist, nothing more.
When necessary, approval is requested, authorization is requested, the appropriate permits are requested for such and such a situation, but the security plans cannot be made public, except strictly to those authorized.
So, let's see, let's see how we move forward with this. God willing, we'll make good progress.
Hopefully, with what happened today and what has happened in these last two weeks, the necessary corrective measures can be taken, and we can move forward as we should.
The situation in Chile is difficult, but it 's not impossible. Things have to change, the strategy has to change, some profound modifications have to be made. Yes, of course, but for that, everyone from the top down has to be aligned.
Otherwise, it's useless, it doesn't work. And we've seen it, we've seen it, right? In those countries where it's been applied poorly and it's never worked.
We'll be nibbling at this and that, and that will never solve the problem. Okay?
Well, dear friends, that's what I wanted to talk to you about.
Thank you for joining me. Leave your comments below the video on this very delicate topic, and if you'd like, we can continue discussing it in another program, but please leave your comments, leave your suggestions, even Perhaps, I do n't know, his health or his intentions.
Dear friends, Chile can be rescued, but it's hard work, it's work that we all have to do together. It's not just about criticizing things. When things are good, we have to say they're good, but when they're bad, wherever they come from, we have to say they're bad so they can be corrected.
And the most important thing at this moment in the country regarding crime is anticipation.
Anticipation, okay?
Before things happen, we're acting, right? In a corrective way, not even preventively, when we should already be acting in an anticipatory way.
That means intelligence comes first.
Intelligence work must be fully activated and reactivated 24/7.
We have to anticipate events. It's no use to me if the whole system is activated when things have already happened, when people have already died, when the drug trafficker has already left, when things have already been carried out.
That's another problem we have in Chile. I don't know Forget that when the Carabineros have made arrests for identifying individuals found with trunks full of weapons and explosives, they've released them because that wasn't actually the Carabineros' mission; it was only to verify identity. But you see them carrying combat rifles in their trunks. Yes, but that wasn't their mission, and the judge lets them go.
So, who's to blame?
Because this has happened in Chile; this isn't a movie, a meme, a joke, it's happened in Chile.
So, when we see this kind of nonsense, when we see this kind of action, we're in trouble, because that's where anticipation comes in. Before these guys commit the crime, before they use the weapons, before they use the explosives, before they hand over the drugs, we have to track them down, track them down with Z.
Or is it very difficult to understand, or do they wait until there are deaths before they say, "Oh, now we did this, this other thing"? No, when the guy is thinking about it, when they're When they're communicating, when they're on social media sharing information about what they're going to do, that's when we have to capture them before they commit the crime. That's when we'll be fine. That's what's being done in El Salvador.
In El Salvador now, individuals don't even think. As soon as they post something, or the guy is organizing, the security forces arrive, the National Civil Police arrive, because it's already been detected before they commit the crime, or am I very wrong, or do they want them to arrive afterward? I don't know.
Like I always say, what I've always criticized in the United States, and I'll continue to criticize it. What good is it to me if 10 people, 20 people die, and then after they're dead the SWAT team arrives? All those guys with sunglasses, combat gear, sleeves rolled up, tactical equipment, and they're already dead. What good are they to me? Idiots, go back. You arrived too late, and I've criticized it and I'll always criticize it. When things happen and then all the special groups arrive and with the Arrogance is useless to me.
Anticipation is over.
Then comes prevention, and only if nothing can be done is corrective action, because we're already screwed, it's happened, and we have to fix what was done, right?
Dear friends, things can be changed. Yes, there must be the will to do so.
And of course, if the will exists from the top and the three branches of government are aligned, there will be that profound change that needs to happen, and things will turn out as they should.
Thank you for following me. Good night. A special greeting to everyone in the Chilean Navy, those in the Navy who are watching, of course, and who have told me, "We're going to watch the Chomba Carreta program."
A special greeting to you all for the month of the sea. Of course. A big hug from afar, have a very good night. May Almighty God protect and bless Chile. May Almighty God protect and bless all Chileans. So be it and so it shall be. And do n't forget that there are more good people than bad. Thank you for being here.
[music] [music] [music] [music] [music] to die, work [music] of [music] yours.
[music] [music] [music] [music] by [music] is that will take [music] [ music] to of [music] all that with your [music] the [music] of [music] blessed [music] glorious [music] [ music] [music]
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











