A court ruling in the Veteran's Guardian class action lawsuit established that non-accredited claims companies operate illegally, setting a legal precedent that allows veterans who were charged by such companies to file their own class action lawsuits to recover illegally collected fees, regardless of the specific fee structure or amount charged.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Rater Provides "A Drunk History" Interpretation Of The Veteran's Guardian Class Action Lawsuit.Added:
Hello and welcome to Raider HQ after dark. I'm your host Raider and I'm going to keep this video as short as I humanly can because we're going to be talking about something I want to talk about and that is current events.
And it seems as though the new hubbub is about the Veterans Guardians class action lawsuit update, which I'm going to give you my drunk history version, you know, which means that I don't have any kind of insight. Don't listen to what I say other than this is my own personal opinion as to what is going on with the Veterans Guardians class action lawsuit update and why it actually does matter in my personal opinion and this is just my personal opinion.
Now, for many people that have reviewed it, that have done a much better job than I have or I will on it, um they have had their own differences of opinion about it. Now, for me, the way that I saw it was that Veterans Guardian put forth a motion to the judge to say, "Hey, look, Veterans Guardian is behaving within the laws, rules, and regulations. So, this class action lawsuit should not exist.
Please rule on this and side with us and then dismiss this case."
And then the plaintiffs did kind of the opposite and said, "Well, wait a minute.
Please rule on whether or not what they're doing is illegal or legal and then if if it's illegal, please let us move forward with our class action lawsuit." To which the judge said, "Hold my beer."
And ooh buddy, did that judge, cuz I skimmed this, but I was like, "Oof, that's that's some harsh language."
The judge didn't pull any punches and said, "No, Veterans Guardian, what you're doing is what we factually in the legal world say is illegal.
So, no, we will not dismiss this case.
No, what you're doing is unequivocally illegal.
Like, the way you behave and your business model and how you where you're at in this situation is illegal.
So, no, your motion is denied. And then went over to the plaintiffs and said, "Okay, because their stuff is illegal, because what they're doing is clearly and irrefutably illegal, this class action lawsuit against Veterans Guardian and the way that they practiced as a non-accredited claims company may move forward."
And that's my, you know, I'm going to take a bow here, but that's my drunk history presentation of what this actually meant.
Now, some people have drawn conclusions from this.
The conclusion that I draw is this ruling has actually shored up one factoid for me.
And it's that claims companies that are not accredited are working illegally.
And what does that mean? Well, that means that this specific ruling didn't decide the outcome of Veterans Guardian's, you know, class action lawsuit, but what it has set precedent for is well, if you're a group of veterans who are not happy about the way that you were billed for a by a non-accredited claims company, you too can start your own class action lawsuit against these non-accredited claims company. Now, I'm going to steal somebody else's statements about this.
Veterans' money should be in the veterans' hands. So if you paid or were billed by, charged by a non-accredited claims company, then maybe you too should start your own class action lawsuit against those companies and get some of that veterans' hard-earned money back in your own hands. Whether or not you were charged five times the the the change in your value, whether or not you were charged an open fee for education, it doesn't matter, my friends.
Veterans, you too, per this ruling because the way Veterans Guardian behaved was illegal. So, can you start your own class action lawsuit and get some of that money back?
Yeah.
That's what this ruling told me.
Now, results may vary whether or not the class action wins, but can you start one? You sure as heck can.
And I suggest you do so.
Because class action lawsuits against non-accredited companies appear to have standing as evidenced by the newest update from Veterans Guardian.
Now, could these non-accredited companies become accredited? Yes, yes they could, but they choose not to be.
And because they choose not to be, they choose to be vulnerable to class action lawsuits.
So, if you're a veteran who has used a non-accredited claims company and have been charged what the court considers illegally, fees that are not legal, that are not approved, that are not authorized, that are not anything, then if you were charged those fees, then yes, maybe you too should start a class action lawsuit. I don't know. It's up to you guys.
But that's my take currently on the updates to the Veterans Guardian's class action lawsuit. And once again, I'm just a guy. I'm just These are layman's terms. This is layman speak for me. And of course, Veterans Guardian will have their day in court.
But guess what? Based upon this ruling, other non-accredited companies could also have their day in court should veterans choose to do class action lawsuits against them to get their hard-earned money back in their hand.
Because they were charged outside of the VA's approved process. So, just keep that in mind, guys.
Veterans, educate yourself. Go with the free option.
Go with the VSO. And if you feel like you need to, go with the accredited attorney or claims agent.
That's the choice that the VA and Congress have given you.
If you choose something else, well, maybe choose a class action lawsuit with it. Anyway, that's about all I got for you in this one. Raider out.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











