The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Mohammad Kashif, who was accused of money laundering and fraud by allegedly posing as PM Modi's aide and promising government jobs and tenders through manipulated photographs, after he had been incarcerated for nearly three years; the Court set aside the earlier bail rejection order, noting that the amount involved (1.10 crores) was not substantial and that the delay in proceedings was attributable to the appellant, while imposing conditions that he must not use the names of high dignitaries and must cooperate with the trial.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
“PM Modi’s Aide Posing Case || SC Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Money Laundering”Added:
Taking pictures of PM and saying I got influenced with the PM and is saying I settled ED matter. You should not refrain from doing that, my lord.
Yes, yes. I promise not to use any picture of the Prime Minister at all. Or any any political And he says I influence I can influence the I have not said about judges, but he says I can influence ED officers.
My lord, what can you What can you do?
He's saying he only he only trying to do whichever way possible. But I'm I'm coming out.
Despite that, you put him behind for 3 years. Yes.
My lord, human mind has no has limitless ingenuity. Human mind can do anything, my lord. See, sir sir, so long as he's you keep filing family like he says I think the CBI eyes are very here are very happy. Yes, they are, my lords. Not your people.
I'm now in custody for almost 3 years in the ED case.
3 years. It's almost 2 years and he's in >> What is the amount involved with you?
1.10 crores is what they say. Their complaint >> My lord, I think this is this is that this is that that is charged is nothing.
So, he has sufficiently suffered. We should give him bail. I'll tell my lords what the about the issue is, my lord.
Yes. But my he had come before my lords on 10th of January 25 where my lords rejected it. That's correct.
Thereafter, my lord, he has filed this successive no change in circumstance covered by two judgments that unless there's a change in circumstance, you are he is only case is delay. He is responsible for delay. He is not cross-examining witnesses. He has given an application that I under 319 saying that I want to add somebody as an accused unless that is decided to get adjourned the matter. If he is responsible for the delay, then my lord, he must pay for He's under He's under 3 years. They want more than what he said. But the delay is attributable to delay is attributable to him, my lords. My lord, my lords, this is not such a huge amount. Take down.
Leave that. Very well. This is my charge from the firm of so-and-so.
Then I see the people in the front submitted that uh though the earlier application was dismissed uh Uh, more than a year and four months has elapsed since then.
Uh, yeah, considering the the specific allegation of the appellant we sent it to you for a for The learned ASG has been responding submitted that there's no change in circumstances in second versus and the delay is attributed to the appellant.
Madam may may I mention one thing my lord? May I mention one thing? Yes. But he's using pictures of PM and saying I got influence with the PM and he's saying I'll settle the ED matter. He should not refrain from doing that my lord. Yes, yes. I promise not to use any picture of the uh Prime Minister at all.
Or any political And he says I influence I can influence the I have not said about judges but he said I can influence the ED officer.
>> [clears throat] >> Therefore, what can you what can you do?
So, he he only he only trying to do whichever way possible. But I'm I'm getting out.
Despite that you put him behind for three years. Yes.
My lord, human mind has no has limitless ingenuity. Human mind can do anything my lord. See, see, see, so long as he you keep filing criminal cases I think the serial liars are very here are very happy. Yes, they are my lords.
Not your business.
Yeah. We are we are inclined to set aside the appeal order only on the premise that appellant has been incarceration for for three years.
Uh, so in such a matter we are inclined to set aside uh also for the reason that the amount involved in the appeal order is only 1.1 crore.
Uh, so we are inclined to set aside.
We will also impose a condition that we additionally impose a condition that appellant shall not uh use the name of high dignitaries decrease.
And he'll cooperate with the trial my lord. He'll cooperate with the explanation.
If the appellant is not cooperating with the trial liberty is given to the respondent to move the trial court for a for for for Yes. All right.
Grateful my lord.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











