When airline misconduct occurs in federal airspace, it triggers concurrent jurisdiction where aviation law, Florida criminal statutes, and constitutional doctrine apply simultaneously; under 14 CFR 252, strict liability applies to aviation violations, meaning each vaping incident creates an independent federal violation with $25,000 civil penalties, and multiple first-hand crew accounts satisfy probable cause for warrantless arrest under the Fourth Amendment, as established in Illinois v. Gates (1983).
Inmersión profunda
Prerrequisito
- No hay datos disponibles.
Próximos pasos
- No hay datos disponibles.
Inmersión profunda
Miami Airport Arrest When Airline Misconduct Becomes a Federal Crime (Bodycam Reaction)Añadido:
Okay, let's get into this one. Body cam analysis, Miami airport arrest. When airline mis- When airline misconduct becomes a federal crime.
Wait, dude. Please, don't touch my bag.
I know. I know you're going to get it.
I'm going to check you in the system.
Okay, we're someone Sorry, baby girl, I'm going to put you in. Yes, sir. So, do you have a uh Can you explain the situation was that there was a guest and she was in 27D.
And there's Genesis uh Genesis and uh Nakeia.
But she was actually caught vaping twice in the flight. So, that's a start. She wouldn't stop. She took the vape from Then she was cursing belligerently, called me a lot of these Elijah almost the first almost the first half of the flight she kept on out of control. We had to separate her from the passenger she was traveling with and move all the guests around her to the front to separate Also, almost got into a fist fight with another passenger. She's just belligerent, totally in control. So, we had to separate her by herself for duration of the flight. And we took She tried to open her alcohol container of alcohol and took a drink as well. This is a vape alcohol, so I'm not going to say anything here because I don't think going to actually come out of here. She'll come out with me, so Okay, we're all set. So, She's making an announcement.
Huh? He's making an a- He's making an announcement to have her come out. If she doesn't come out, then we'll have to come in. Sup? Federal airspace triggers concurrent jurisdiction aviation law, Florida criminal statute and constitutional doctrine apply simultaneously. 14 CFR 252 is strict liability. Two vaping incidents create two independent federal violations.
46C380 adds $25,000 civil penalties each.
Illinois v. Gates, 1983. Multiple first-hand crew accounts satisfy probable cause for a warrantless arrest under the Fourth Amendment.
What?
Okay, so >> [clears throat] >> she's going to get charged twice because she hit the vape twice.
So [ __ ] stupid, guys. So stupid. If you vape, [ __ ] watch where you vape. Jesus Christ. Come on now.
Genesis is Genesis. Genesis is in 11.
Uh Genesis, will you need to come forward, please?
Will you need to come forward, please?
Thank you. Yeah, thank you.
Um vaping in the plane and she's causing 25 with other passengers and [ __ ] like that.
Did they see me? They see uh it's a beautiful song or something. Did they send you back here? Yeah, they did.
Yeah, she is a self-entitled fool. Hey Ross, did you Yeah.
It's ours.
That's a walk of shame right there.
[laughter] Just the box cutter.
What's your name?
Genesis. Genesis. Florida 87703 requires no physical violence. Verbal disorder on public transportation qualifies. 85601 adds disorderly intoxication. What's that?
I didn't do anything at all.
Come on.
This is not even the thing.
I didn't do anything. I didn't hurt anybody. You got an ID on you? I didn't hurt anybody and I didn't hurt you. Hey, you can stop. I didn't hurt anybody. Shut up.
Shut up. I have lawyers. Are you stupid?
Are you dumb? I'll talk to you though.
No, I don't care. No.
I'm surprised that they're letting her just be on her phone like that. Like they just didn't automatically put the cuffs on her as soon as she got off the plane. That's kind of That really surprises me.
Don't touch me.
Don't touch me.
I have lawyers. Are you dumb?
All right. All right. All right. All right.
Now you're going to jail. No, I'm not going to jail. Yep.
For what?
I haven't assaulted anybody at all.
What am I going to jail for? That's the thing. What am I going to jail?
Huh?
I don't know how much she drank on the plane. Babe.
>> [crying] >> What she drinking on the plane?
Yeah. Yes, she was drinking on the plane. I had one shot though. One shot.
That doesn't affect me. Juju.
Can you open up? Are you dumb?
Miranda v. Arizona, 1966. Custody attached before advisement. The admission I had one shot creates suppression exposure at trial. Missouri v. Cyber, 2004. Pre-warning custodial statements are excludable. The arrest stands, the evidentiary record may not.
So what the robot voice was just saying is basically she she said she had one shot, so she admitted to drinking. So they'll use that against her in her trial. Respond. What's going on? You're going to break my arm.
Oh, can I have my ID?
Wait. Wait. Wait.
>> [laughter] >> Please respond to my arm.
Please.
And this is the second walk of shame.
Wait.
Wait.
My arm is going to break.
Wait, dude. Please. Don't touch my arm.
Wait.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
That feels a lot better.
That's what the [ __ ] Graham v.
Connor, 490 U.S. 86 1989. Forces judged by objective reasonableness at the moment of application, not in hindsight.
All three Graham factors support restraint. Severity of offense, active non-compliance, and no physical threat force was proportional. The subject's own statement, that feels a lot better, is admissible evidence refuting any subsequent excessive force claim. You guys are in Miami court, I know.
Exactly. So, you don't have to treat me that bad. We are not out of the state.
You guys are in the country.
Where are you a citizen of?
We're not out of the state. You can't treat me like that.
I wasn't doing jack [ __ ] You guys just want to do something for Got my face.
And I gave you that paycheck, stupid.
My brother's going to pay that [ __ ] regardless.
Oh, yeah.
You can't kill me for no [ __ ] reason.
You got two of my arms this time. This is No, but it's all of y'all.
Florida 83605 second-degree felony, Virginia v. Black 2003. "I'm going to shoot all of y'all" satisfies specificity. Intent is contested.
All of y'all got me left with no [ __ ] socks. Absolutely no socks.
TSA. You're going to put me through TSA again? No ma'am. No ma'am.
Put me through jail right now.
You have a 10-15 fighting now.
Why? No. I'm not a criminal. I'm not fighting.
I'm not a Why did I do Am I stupid or you?
Oh, wait. We've been to court about Female 10-80 is responding to a 415 at 423 or 311 at 999 17.
Stay right here. 3 alpha 11 will be 10-80 on the Why is it 3, bro?
I have to leave at 3, dude. What are you doing? This is your fault, bro. He was on me. That's not fair. He was [crying] on me, bro. And I pushed him off. That's not fair.
I pushed him off of me, bro. That's not fair. Okay, so there was definitely a physical altercation now that she's talking about. They never even like told her what she was being charged with. So, all I heard was the vaping and she created a disturbance, so Hmm.
He was on me.
He wanted to get at me, bro.
10-15-39 753 from the rear of the 22s on the back of the 10-11 to check on the daughter. Mother is requesting to bring her child to the ER. He was on me.
I'm on.
You have to understand that's why the 10-11 was on me. I couldn't do anything to him.
I don't know. I'm like so bad.
I don't know what I'm going to do.
I don't know what you want to be. I hate you.
I hate you. I'm so bad.
Bye.
I don't want to go.
My friend's coming to get her purse.
Okay, we're going to recharge your iPhone. Phone is charging. Phone is charging. Thank you.
What's the vacation? I mean the I have a 20. Can I have Cuz I guess she was on the plane.
She was on the plane.
Hopefully it was just a Probably she said she was She said he was drinking.
I appreciate you. Thank you.
I'll buy myself Let's go. Let's go. Where is your car?
Yes. Okay. All right.
Officer's B+. Solid probable cause.
Proportional force. Docked for undocumented Miranda and failure to formally address the criminal threat.
Genesis. The federal violations, self-incrimination after invoking counsel, and a potential felony threat all in one encounter. Flight crew. A factual, structured briefing established the constitutional foundation for a valid arrest.
Okay, I'm going to put those charges back up on the screen. They were just there. They weren't there very long.
Here they are. So, vaping aboard an aircraft, interference with flight crew, crew intimidation.
That's That's a big one right there.
Disorderly conduct, disorderly intoxication, resisting arrest, um criminal threatening. So, uh if she vaped, she vaped. Obviously, they're going to uh There's proof of that. They all the witnesses saw that.
They probably will only get her once.
You know, they'll they'll count it as one incident. They'll play it down.
Interference with a flight [snorts] crew Yeah, I don't I don't know. That's that's a that's a I don't know about that. Crew intimidation. It's going to be hard to prove all that, but obviously disorderly conduct, disorderly intoxication, uh resisting without violence.
Uh criminal threatening. I you know, she was just rambling, rambling, rambling. I really didn't hear the criminal threatening.
So, uh I don't know I don't know, but if it was there, it was there.
Um this woman is a she's a she's a train wreck. She's a train wreck. And she had a puppy with her, and uh her friend's going to have to come get the puppy, I guess.
She's a train wreck. And she was talking about how her boyfriend's going to bail her out and pay for everything.
Okay.
We'll see. We'll see. Anyway, uh that was this one.
Uh a couple of walks of shame. Uh it was uh not a lot of action, just a just a Latina woman crying on camera.
So, basically, that's all it was. And um man, these these officers, you know, they they Shout out to the police, man. They really really really show a lot of restraint, a lot of patience when it comes to dealing with these idiots.
And I commend them for that. And uh yeah, this is our our second walk of shame here with this broad. Uh all right. Thank you guys for watching. I'll see you guys in the next video. Take care. Peace out.
Videos Relacionados
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











