This analysis correctly identifies that prioritizing ideological dogma over empirical evidence inevitably erodes the foundations of justice and intellectual accountability. The UK's shift marks a necessary return to due process, challenging the performative moral certainty that has long stifled honest public discourse.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
UK Has Officially Ended The Believe All Women Trope
Added:I wouldn't be surprised if the rate for a sexual assault on women over one's lifetime is as high as one in three or one in two. We just don't know because nobody [ __ ] reports because reports aren't taken seriously. That's what Me Too is about.
>> You're like, I don't think things are on the same level, but things impact you in like bizarre ways.
Yeah, [snorts] like it because the perpetrator wasn't white. Um and because he was like, I'm you know, part of like a certain religion.
>> [snorts] >> Are we Are we being real?
>> And the police were basically just like, we can't because of cultural differences, which I don't feel like is such a good >> What?
[ __ ] Are you [ __ ] kidding me? Did she turn her [ __ ] rape confession into how into how the rape fugitives [ __ ] Ahmed Mohamed raped her and the police were like, we can't persecute brown people. [ __ ] >> She then goes out and calls her a [ __ ] or a [ __ ] I forgot exactly what. But uh as you can see, this is the standard move for a lot of leftists. And I noticed that when you look at racist people, uh like they exist. You can find them on the internet. And and they also have their own prejudices.
Like they will believe that uh black people are fatherless.
But when they meet a black person that has a father, they don't make it so that the prejudice has to uh enforce itself on reality and be like, no, no, no, you don't you don't really have a father.
Like, no, no, you're lying to me. You're lying. No, you like, maybe you do have a father, but like be honest. He's not in a marriage with your mom. Like he he never actually visits, right? No, like racist go like, okay, well, I do believe that on average, this is the case, but like I've actually met a person that uh doesn't comply to the stereotype, right?
So like he's an exception.
Meanwhile, when I look at leftists, they all seem to do this. Like they have their own preconceptions.
And and when they counter something that doesn't fit that ideology, it means that that thing must be false. Like like that ideology works in absolute. There is no exception. And this is the mindset of a zealot, right? And when you create a culture like this where on one hand you act like you care and you're treating it as a serious issue, it's like, "Okay, maybe maybe it's one out of two women that get raped in their lifetime. Maybe it's one out of one. Maybe my mother herself, you know, maybe if I transition I'm going to get it. Who knows, right?"
So, you're treating it like you're taking it very seriously.
But when you're taken outside the narrative and you have a woman that's saying, "Look, uh people don't believe me." And Vaush goes like, "Yeah, yeah, yeah, like see, this is the problem. This is the problem."
Well, I happened to get raped by a person that uh was not white. And then Vaush immediately doesn't even say that "Okay, well, this is an exception. Well, all right, maybe this is just one lady."
Uh or even says, "Uh well, I don't I don't believe her personally." No, he starts insulting her. He becomes aggressive. He becomes very agitated. He becomes angry. He starts performing, right?
Um and I want you to remember this video as we're going to watch the next one.
Which are now becoming a meme because every single time they're presented with arguments that that ideology doesn't have answers for, they make this face. And they make this face uh because they want the power of the crowd. They believe that uh if we have like uh democratic consensus, if everyone agrees with me, and I'm treating you as stupid, or I'm pretending not to understand what you're saying, or I'm acting confused and baffled, then I will get to win. And the reality is that maybe they do get to win, but the gangs keep raping, right? So, like all the public discourse, like congratulations, like these tactics work, right? Like you seriously, like most people are more emotional than they are on their intellectual side, right? And so, uh body language, uh appeal to public emotion works. That's why they exist.
But the gangs will still rape, okay?
And they do not want to have an honest conversation. And so, let's analyze what this lady was saying. She was saying that listen, the academic rigor wasn't done properly.
All right, you know, like hey, hey, fair enough. Was the academic rigor done properly when you released the documentary Adolescence? Was the academic rigor done properly when you guys went and said believe all women? Was the academic rigor done properly when you guys make the claim that Andrew Tate and Elon Musk is to blame for most of the problems that are happening in UK? All right, YOU KNOW WHAT? FAIR ENOUGH. FAIR ENOUGH.
It's like the academic rigor. Do you know what's interesting? Have you ever argued with a leftist online?
Cuz I have. You You know what it is that when they [snorts] argue, they start demanding like more evidence.
And so, maybe they want the quote where you get to show them that the sky is blue.
And you show them you know a newspaper article and you point look look, the sky is blue.
I don't like that source.
I don't like that source. You know, now you need to search for another source.
Eventually, you find the source that they like.
Ah, it's not the exact same thing. It's not the exact same thing, right? So, if it's not the exact same thing, then you can't uh like for example, you show them a lake and you show them the reflection of the sky in the lake and you show that the lake is blue cuz like THAT'S WHAT YOU FOUND, you know? Like you didn't have the evidence at hand. It's not the same. I want to see the picture of the sky from a source that I trust. And of course, the reality is that there is no source that they would trust. Even if you show them the actual footage of an event, then they will say that the problem is the footage and they would want the footage to be bad and they will say that the event is just a one-off.
And if you talk about another event, it's just one-off. And if you bring up the previous events, they will say, "Oh, you're doing what about three." Uh everybody knows that you cannot convince a zealot. And there are two reasons, like number one, most people uh when they are confronted with things that they believe fundamentally to be true, uh their mind protects them. And so they try to be extremely skeptical, right? Uh this is why when a uh documentary like Abdallah Sheshen comes along, they automatically believe it because that fits their worldview, so they're not skeptical. But if something different happens that goes against their ideology, all of a sudden they want the academic papers. Now, with that out of the way, uh there is also the conflict of interest, right?
Like uh many of these ladies have advocated for the policies uh that have created and normalized leftist word, right? Uh the problem that Britain is now facing.
And what people absolutely hate and despise is accountability, right? Like uh people in power, they like making decisions, but they never like getting audited.
They never actually like to look at if their decisions made a positive change or not.
Uh and so how do they justify it to their base?
Well, in the case like the inquiry which came up and uh hundreds of thousands of girls apparently got molested, the only way to uh respond to your base is to say that it's false or to claim that you don't believe it or to laugh it off to say, "Oh, it's so ridiculous.
So ridiculous. How could it have happened?" You know, like it's uh a lie so big that surely it must not be true.
I haven't read it, but I'm certain that it's not true because it hasn't been uh verified by the people that I like, people who also have a conflict of interest. Cuz like that's the thing, you know, like we we have to pretend like the academia, which is an institution, right? Is now the science.
It's like, no, the scientific method is something objective that belongs to everyone, but the institution the institution is staffed by humans with political ambitions, with personal ambitions, with getting money from someone. And the people that they get money from is the government, right?
Which is now being accused of being irresponsible. So like, why would the government want the people that it's paying to come out and say that, "Hey, you done [ __ ] up." Right? So this is why like people do not believe the academia and the institutions. And also, the fact that the British way of solving dialogue was never to actually look at the situation and come up and discuss.
Their way was censorship.
And censorship means that you can't be trusted, right? Because censoring something doesn't mean you want the debate. It just means that you didn't want the debate to happen.
Imagine a family, right? Where the wife believes that the husband is cheating, and the husband's response is to constantly censor the wife, to confiscate her phone, to prevent her from talking about it. Does the wife believe that the husband is cheating?
Like, no, like she's going to start believing it even more, because censorship is the weapon of a coward.
And in Britain, we've noticed that censorship has moved from initially, you know, you say slurs and certain things that are offensive to actual things that are political to actual footage. Like, for example, the Belfast riots, I heard from British politicians that the problem was the footage.
That there is an invention now which allows a grown adult to film something that's happening in real life and then upload it to other grown adults, right?
Like, that is the problem. And Elon Musk, who has a platform that allows this transfer to happen.
And so, this is a huge loss of legitimacy for these people and a huge I mean I I I don't even know like the this lady in particular, I understand she changed her avatar in order to respond to the haters.
Brilliant PR move. Like what can I say, you know? Um the problem is like they have trained the public to believe that you have to trust all women. Like why would women lie?
That's literally their ideology, right?
Like believe all women. Wasn't that a couple of that long ago? And it came from the UK as well. Like this entire feminist cult it had its base in the British academia.
And so you move from like believe all women to now laugh at women?
I don't know how even their base is going to handle this. Like this is a little bit interesting.
Let me know what you guys think and as usual, we'll see each other in the comment section.
Take care.
Related Videos
Communist manifesto was written by Marks and ?
ApnaHistoryOfficial
1K views•2026-06-16
Churches Were Preaching To Make Money | Michael Jones Inspiring Philosophy Speakers corner
LilLaaHilHamd
140 views•2026-06-14
Mandukya Upanishad | Day 52 | Swami Nikhilananda Saraswati
swami.nikhilananda.saraswati
119 views•2026-06-17
The Moral Ethics of Hamsterdam - The Wire
TheShowiest
1K views•2026-06-19
Discovering Better Logics in a Binary World | Dr. Tamice Spencer-Helms | TNE Podcasts
thenewevangelicalspodcast
148 views•2026-06-15
The Person You Protect Does Not Exist
TheChopraWell
1K views•2026-06-16
The Most Honest Lucid Dreaming Video I've Ever Made
luciddreamingteacher
153 views•2026-06-20
June 16, 2026
nickcbarr
1K views•2026-06-16











