The essential economy—comprising 95 million American workers in manufacturing, transportation, and repair sectors—faces a critical shortage of approximately one million workers due to declining societal prestige of these jobs, reduced vocational education investment, and regulatory burdens; this challenge is compounded by the automotive industry's struggle to adapt to electric vehicle transitions, where customer preferences for hybrids over full electrics and intense global competition from Chinese manufacturers like BYD (which receives $4,000-5,000 in government subsidies per vehicle) threaten American industrial competitiveness.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Ford CEO Jim Farley on the Future of the Essential Economy
Added:This is a story about the essential economy.
That's what Ford CEO Jim Farley calls the part of the US market where things get built, moved, or fixed.
This week, he held a series of meetings at the restored Michigan Central Rail Station in Detroit, and we traveled there to hear directly from him what needs to be done.
-95 million people, huge part of our GDP, that basically build things.
Think about factory workers, construction workers.
The people who move things, rail workers, truck drivers.
And the people who fix things.
Think about plumbers, electricians, people who are mechanics on your vehicle.
That's the economy.
It's huge, and we have about a million people shortage today.
Westin: What's going on there?
Why are we short that many essential workers?
- It's a combination of things, David, but I think the biggest thing is the societal prestige of these jobs has changed from our parents and our grandparents.
You know, people all want to go to a four-year degree, and then they want to go into the white-collar workforce.
That's what my grandfather told me.
He was a factory worker.
"Hey, Jim, I don't want you to have to work this hard.
"Go to college."
And the irony of the irony is we have all these data centers, all this new technology to roll out.
It still requires electricians, construction workers, you know, and we have this huge shortage.
The second thing is our country has really pulled back on investing in education programs, the local college support for these kinds of jobs.
There's no high schools around vocational programs anymore.
That's the exception, not the rule anymore.
I think the last thing is permitting all the regulatory requirements on these jobs is really tough, especially for small business.
And it just makes these jobs hard and complicated.
Westin: How does AI fit with the essential economy?
-Well, I hope that it will be a help, but it's hard to say that today.
We're going to have a lot of tailwinds for the essential economy of AI.
For example, we have to build all these data centers, all the transmission lines.
That's going to require plumbers, you know, electricians, a lot of technical people to do all that, construction workers.
But on the other hand, over the last 20 years, the essential economy productivity has actually gone down, whereas white collar productivity has gone up 20 or 30%.
That's like, for the average essential worker, that's like $30,000 a year.
So we don't have a good track record here of applying new technology like AI to make these jobs more productive.
You know, automation, things like that, those innovations really took jobs out of the job market and out of the essential economy.
I think we'd have to twist the technology through the lens of these critical jobs for it to be the opposite.
Westin: The government plays a central role in turning around the essential economy, with President Trump emphasizing manufacturing and the need for trade schools.
But Farley has yet to see the real results, including with those auto tariffs.
-It's too early to tell.
I haven't seen a lot of new plant announcements of my competitors who import.
You know, our market is 50% import.
So what I was looking for is how many of those imported vehicles are now being built in the US We haven't seen too many announcements.
What hasn't changed is Ford's commitment to the US.
We build 80% of our vehicles here.
We're the largest employer, UAW workers, and we're the largest exporter by far from the US.
I would say it is too early to tell.
But I'm seeing the tone at the top in DC be very thoughtful about the parts tariffs, which more than 20% of our tariff, of our profits, is lost on these parts tariffs.
So, yes, we make in the US, but we import parts from all around the world.
Because some of them, like wiring looms, we can't even buy in the US.
The tariffs on those parts, maybe 20% of your F-150, is 20% of our profit gone.
And I'm seeing a tone at the top in DC where they are listening to us very carefully, because they understand long term that $22 billion of headwind for us will not be good for the US.
Especially for a company like Ford.
I don't know what they're going to do.
But, boy, have we had a lot of conversations with commerce and the president about this.
And I remain very optimistic that they'll make the right adjustments.
If they make the right adjustments on tariffs with the EPA rule, some of the tax changes, like PTC, I think we will see a much stronger US industry in the coming years.
And I'm sure hopeful of that.
Westin: When we spoke to Farley a year ago, before President Trump's election, the auto industry was working and investing hard to meet government targets for electric vehicles.
Since then, EV policy has been turned on its head, making automakers' lives dramatically more complicated.
Roger Penske, founder of the Penske Corporation and owner of IndyCar, says it's the result of ignoring what the customer wants.
-No one asked the customer what they wanted, number one, and number two, we didn't have the infrastructure and the expectation on range wasn't there.
So everything came together, the way they sold electric vehicles was with government support.
The $7,500 is going away.
When you think about that, that's $50 billion that the government is going to be able to put, hopefully, towards something that's better off, you know, for our economy, and better off for the country.
But I would say they're going through a transition.
All of them have said, Mary Barra has, you know, Farley has, they're moving to lower-cost EV vehicles.
Westin: You at Ford, like the other automakers, have really made a lot of capital investment commitments for an EV future.
What happens to those investments now?
-It's an important question for our country.
First of all, Ford never talked about an all-electric Ford.
We always said "customer choice."
We have hybrid, the F-150, best-selling vehicle in the United States.
Almost a third is now hybrid.
So we never bet the farm on electrification.
And we were first mover.
We've been number two to Tesla, I think, for three years now.
But that is the biggest next-up question.
How does Ford adjust its assets from moving to making large-scale battery operations?
We have three battery plants in Kentucky and Tennessee, another one here in Michigan, and Marshall.
So four plus two assembly plants dedicated to electrics.
You know, what do we do with those assets?
I'm not going to go into the details, but all I say is they're some of the best factories we've ever built.
We've designed them flexibly and we'll make the right decision for the company.
We're not going to allow these to be mothballed.
And we have more decisions to make on those battery plants and assembly plants in the coming months and years with this change.
Because a year ago, we didn't see the customer like we do today.
And boy, are we seeing customers buy hybrids and partial electric solutions.
So America is moving more to low CO2 footprint powertrains, but they are not accepting full electrics anywhere near what we thought.
Westin: When you talk about some of the policies coming out of Washington, on the one hand, as you mentioned, there's the $7,500 credit, goes away this week.
On the other hand, you've got the CAFE.
So there's some gives and takes on this.
How does that all come up for the Ford Motor Company?
- Well, it's accelerating this awkward moment, basically.
The $7,500, which could be up to, you know, 20%, 30% of the purchase price, is gone.
That makes EVs a lot more expensive.
But think about Ford as a global company.
We're not just the most American company.
We compete around the globe.
And in China, 50% of the vehicles are electric.
In Europe, it's 30%.
So we have to set up our industrial system to compete not just in the 4% or 5% here in America, with maybe a higher mix of hybrids or EREVs, but in China, or the rest of the world, we still have to make this EV future profitable.
To do that, we made a big bet four years ago.
We did it in secret.
We came up with a small group of people on the West Coast.
And we redesigned the way we make and design a vehicle.
We called it the Universal Electric Vehicle.
It's kind of a Model T kind of moment for the company.
That vehicle will be coming out in about a year and a half.
That is our way of competing with BYD's cost.
They've been at it for 20 years.
These markets are huge outside the US.
We still have to be successful globally.
We can't just draw a big wall around the US and say that's what Ford Motor Company is.
Westin: Another subject we discussed a year ago was China and what's going on.
Bring us forward one year.
What's going on, for example, with BYD.
-Yeah, I mean, a year ago, Tesla was the number one seller globally of electric vehicles.
And VW was the top brand in China.
The world's biggest market is almost 27 million.
The US is 16, maybe, on a good day.
Imagine how big that is.
It's not twice as big, but it's a big market.
Now BYD is not only outselling Volkswagen, they're now the number one electric player in the world a year later.
Very powerful company, vertically integrated, like Henry Ford did in the 30s.
We're very humble, but as the same token, Ford has announced our universal electric platform to be built in Louisville, Kentucky.
And we think it's basically a wash with BYD made in Mexico, because we've thrown innovation at it.
So a lot has changed.
And we've seen Europe has been really the battleground for... globally for the Chinese.
Now it looks like this month, I bet you the Chinese will be close to 10% of the European EV market.
Many of the brands weren't even on sale a year ago.
MG, Geely, others.
Now they're very successful like BYD in Europe.
It's a really a moment, a transitional moment for our industry, where everyone used to talk about South Korea or Japan.
In my eyes as a CEO, China is the place where the most fit industrial systems are getting created, not just for electric vehicles, but for internal combustion vehicles.
And without projects like UEV companies will be under threat of existence.
Westin: You were on the front lines when Japanese manufacturers stole market share from the United States.
But bringing it forward to today, there is a different economic structure in China that involves subsidies.
-Yes, there is.
Westin: Can the American auto industry out-compete those subsidies, out-innovate those subsidies?
-That's a very difficult answer to give you right now.
I think it's too early to answer your question, because we're only in the second inning of these pure electric vehicles, and the innovation cycle's so fast.
We could be talking in a year or two of a whole new battery technology that could either change that equation.
But I will say at this point, they have a big lead.
When you look at BYD, we think on average, four to five thousand dollars a vehicle of direct support from the Chinese government that's exported to Europe, and New Mexico, and places like that.
Can we make up for that?
Plus their scale, their industrial scale, of being ten times bigger than the US?
I'd say it's pretty difficult at this point.
I will tell you, the level of risk that we've had to take on UEV, on the execution side, large unit castings, building a vehicle in a way we've never built before, it's not a guaranteed project.
This is all going to come together just like we thought.
And so we think we're even with them right now, but the speed of innovation we're seeing is very humbling for me.
Even if we have a stable platform on cost today, will that platform be competitive in five years?
When the battery tech does another full cycle of innovation?
Hard to say.
I'm thinking about 2032 right now.
To answer your question, I'm there.
I have to make those capital choices now for 2032.
To answer your question right now, I think there's a chance.
But without huge support, where it's more of a level playing field, where it isn't in Europe, I think it's going to be really tough.
Maybe the toughest battle of my career.
Related Videos

Drop the Loser Mentality
houseitlexi
180 views•2026-04-20

Arrête de louer en Floride Tu passes à côté d’une opportunité énorme !
thierryburtincfde
104 views•2026-04-21

SINGAPORE UNCOVER INVESTIGATION - Eco Ring Japan luxury goods buying centre in Singapore
PaulPlutaPrestige
5K views•2019-03-29

Humanizing Data | Stan Lee | TEDxUTAR
TEDx
472 views•2019-03-07

Mastering the Restaurant Industry - From Dive Bars to Michelin Stars
RestaurantRockstars
118 views•2025-04-06

Ep. 35: How to Send Lots of Satellites to Space (for Cheap)
crossingthevalley
188 views•2025-03-05

Motivating Behavior
GreggU
5K views•2019-11-08

BIO Compass Your Insider Guide to Events During JPM Week 2020
BioOrgBiotech
411 views•2019-12-16
Trending

What Went Wrong With Alpha? | Spoiler Talk & Discussion
TriedRefusedProductions
76K views•2026-07-06

Ford Rehires Engineers They Had Replaced With AI
stevelehto
39K views•2026-07-06

Asking Africa’s Richest Man How He Made $30 Billion!
theschoolofhardknocks
82K views•2026-07-06

CHINA BANS GOLD TRADING
lenapetrova
69K views•2026-07-06