Qwen 3.7 Max (Tested) : Finally A Model Better Than Claude Opus 4.7 & GPT 5.5

Added: 2026-05-22

[00:00:00]Hey guys, welcome back to another new exciting video. Finally, Quent team has published another new exciting model which is the Quen 3.7 Max and I am really happy with this model because this model really beating the Claude Opas 4.6 and also Kim K 2.6. Yes guys, you have heard it right and the benchmark that they have given this SWB Pro, SWB multilingual or this terminal bench 2.0 on this agent coding, it is 100% correct. Not only that here you see on this claw eval it is beating the kim K2.6 and also giving the same performance like the claw opas 4.6. So on this real world agentic category like open claw this model really have the uh best performance on the long horizon task. Now here you see I have tried this model on their official website chat.co.ai by selecting this model coin3.7 from this dropdown and this is the kind of output. Okay. So now let me uh just uh show you this. So let me copy this code and go to my VS code and paste it inside my index html. And uh let me open it. And I will say that this model have the capability uh to give the same kind of output like the cloud opas 4.7 also. First I will show you this coen 3.7 output. Then after that I will show you claude opas 4.7 output. Okay. It is completely matching guys. I was also got amazed that how it is getting matched.

[00:01:30]Here you see when I'm scrolling down from the upper to lower okay from top to bottom here you see means this kind of portion this um horizontal scrolling I have just uh found this kind of animation uh in case of cloudopas 4.7 and after this uh for from co 3.7 I found this kind of animation not only that here you see that this kind of text this kind of text also was there in cloudopas 4.7 and Here you see this kind of small small text from left hand corner right hand corner and now another interesting thing here you see so this kind of advanced animated portion and see this okay when the uh click event happened so it is clicking on a particular box okay it is not out of the box uh it is clicking so it is clicking on AM W and T properly and then save button right now if I scroll down below and here is The interesting thing see this animation see this animation feel it okay so this is a means what can I say okay I I'm completely speechless means how much improvement they have done you can actually think it and also this one okay let me let me just place myself on the left hand side and just feel it guys just feel it see the animation means I have not found this kind of animation from cloud opas 4.6 6 also and from claopus 4.7 also but this kind of animation I have got from uh coin 3.7 and see this okay now if I scroll down here you see this is a complete beautiful um this landing page that they have made so I'm totally means uh happy with this model uh quen 3.7 now let me show you the output from the cloudopas 4.7 also okay then you will understand so cloudopas 4.7 yes this one uh let me place myself here okay and uh open this index html so this is the output from the cloud opas 4.7 now if I scroll down here you see uh I was telling about this this horizontal scrolling okay and after that this one uh okay uh if I scroll down here you see so this is the output animation from this opas 4.7 and now Uh this is the output animation from coin 3.7. So coen 3.7 totally beating the opas 4.7 in case of front end coding. Okay. Now here you see the animation. This is this is from the opas 4.7 and this is from the coen 3.7. Now you tell me which one is best. Obviously obviously coen 3.7 output is much better than the opas 4.7. Okay. Now see this portion this animation. This is from the co 3.7 and now this is from the opas 4.7. Now you tell me which one is best.

[00:04:32]This is obviously best because here you see these numbers are written. Okay. And also the animation it is showing it is also uh having the gradient means from left to right you see there is a gradient right. But here there is no gradient just come one uh orange color uh this beep beep beep it is going on.

[00:04:52]Right? So I I'm completely happy with this model and I will give give 10 on 10 on the front end coding and design part and SVG generation u this coen 3.7 really a great model you should definitely go ahead with this okay means uh in case of opus 4.7 or 4.6 six, the pricing is high, right? Uh $15 and $5.

[00:05:15]So, you can avoid that. Uh you can definitely choose this model. And if you go with this open router here, you see that the input price is very less than the opas. $2.5 for the 1 million input token and $7.5 for the uh 1 million output token. Okay. Now, come to the um aentic uh part. So if I scroll down below uh if I yes this one co-work productivity assistant. So here you see coin 3.7 max serves as your advanced coworker for a real world productivity. It is powerful agent. Its powerful agent capabilities fundamentally streamline professional workflows synthesizing complex information performing in-depth data analysis modeling and generating the uh publication ready documents and visualization to reliably handle the high complexity enterprise workloads.

[00:06:07]And if you see this uh if you see this video then you'll understand here you see with the haries agent you can use this model or with open claw with coen code and clot code you can definitely use this with various kind of uh data analysis or investment purpose um investigation purpose you can use it or with uh if you if you want to try to build a excel or a visual tracking dashboard from your data then here you see this kind of output. code you will get. Okay. And not only that this agent scaling is very important because uh they have tried this model with the different different uh new environment because uh if you uh train a model on a particular some environment let's say you are uh you are training a model on a particular one ID okay or particular one terminal or particular one browser then this model can be failed uh for a different ID or different environment. So that's why they have scaled this agent on a different different environment means a different different ID, different different terminal and also different different scenarios. Okay. And that's why this model is uh giving the same kind of performance. Here you see a top three average ranking that approaches clot opas 4.6 clot opas 4.6 max version.

[00:07:29]Okay. Not only this this cross harness generation this is also very important and self evolving in the wild. So in case of Kimik K 2.6 We have seen uh there was a example like u when you are giving the model a completely unseen uh task then it is doing that properly means if you read this portion then you'll understand we task quen 3.7 max with optimizing this kernel on an ECS instance equipped with th JW uh blah blah blah a hardware platform never seen during training the model had no pri prior profiling data so the model have not any idea any prior idea about this machine the hardware. Okay. And no hardware documentation also there no example kernel for this architecture. So it started it started from an empty workspace containing a uh only one only a task description. So we have given only a task description the existing AC lang implementation and an evaluation script. Now after that it has done it properly and the interesting thing is that this portion we also ran the same task with several other models under the same condition. GM 5.1 reached 7.3x Kim K2.6 reached 5.0x and DFC version 4 Pro reached 3.3x and 3.6 plus from co reached the 1.1x. So the model uh stopped early because the agent issues uh no tool calls for the five consecutive rounds but uh coen 3.7 actually performed it in a proper way.

[00:09:03]Okay. So this is the diagram they have seen.

[00:09:07]So this is the thing guys and also if I talk about this output token uh yesterday I talk about the Gemini 3.5 flash but today I'm telling you that uh if you want to choose a model between Gemini 3.5 flash and this coen 3.7 max then I will definitely suggest you and recommend you highly that go with the coen 3.7 max okay because coen 3.7 max output and the capability is thousand times better than the Gemini 3 uh flash.

[00:09:38]And also another point is that the pricing here you see output token pricing uh is $7.5 for the coin 3.7 max but it is $9 for the Gemini 3.5 flash.

[00:09:50]Um and also the performance from Gemini 3.5 flash is actually very very lower than the um 3.7 Max from coin. Okay. So my sgestion is go with this model 3.7 Max. Okay. And not only that here you see that uh from this atomic chat I got this post co 3.7 max beats opas 4.7 and GPD 5.5. So I was telling you this only uh that this model really have the capability to beat OPAS 4.7 and the difference also I have shown you. Now here you see we tested three frontier models means opas 4.7 GPD 5.5 and queen 3.7 max on a real aentic task. Write a tetris board that plays the game and trains itself. Each model could read its own code, run benchmarks and rewrite itself across 10 iteration. Means it needs to write a Tetris board and train it itself. Then we compare the final boards head to head. And here you see coin 3.7 max training cost was $1.32 and improvement 56% opas 4.7 training cost was very high uh 12.15 but improvement is only 28%. Which is half from the coin 3.7 max and for GPD 5.5 training cost was $2.85 and the improvement was 7%. So coin on on every decision biggest jump 9x cheaper than clot. Okay, it is it is very important that it is 9x cheaper than clot opass model but it is giving the great performance on the long aentic loops. Here you see this is the actually output.

[00:11:27]Okay. So this is the kind of tree spot that they have made and trained it. Now this is another here you see co 3.7 max is the best and frustated by so far. uh one shot, zero shot, one try and impressive results all around.

[00:11:43]And here you see this kind of output means cloud opas 4.7 output and co 3.7 max output it is completely matching.

[00:11:56]So if it is completely matching then you should definitely go with this uh coin 3.7 max because the pricing is less and uh same performance. And uh here you see that uh coin 3.7 max the token usage for the same result is 97 million whereas uh clson at 4.6 and opas 4.6 they have high um token usage than the coin 3.7 max and the thing is that this model completely beating set okay completely beating set and also same performance like the opas 4.6 6 and Opus 4.7 and here you see this is the cost and the model using the le token and uh its cost is less than the Gemini 3.5 flash also. So this model really recommendable to use and also it has the 1 million token context window.

[00:12:49]So [snorts] yes guys um this is the information that I wanted to share with you. I hope that you found this video helpful and I will not test the reasoning because uh almost all of the model have the uh same kind of reasoning capability. The main important is the agentic capability because it is very important for nowadays that for any coding environment for your non-coding task or like let's say open claw or this pico claw or any other claw or in case of coding um any of the ID that you are using there you can uh actually test the agentic capability. Okay. So this model really a great model currently and I will say this is the number one top model currently. Okay and have the same capability like the cloudopas. Okay. So this is the honest review that I tried to give you guys. If you found this help video helpful don't forget to subscribe this channel and don't forget to follow me on Twitter. I have given the link in description and please join the WhatsApp channel link that links are also in given in description. Okay. So see you guys in the next video. Thanks for watching. Bye-bye. Take care and please don't forget to like this video. Don't forget to subscribe this channel to get this kind of honest review from this channel and also all of the latest AI notification. So see you guys in next video. Thanks for watching. Bye-bye.