These Physicists Claim They Can Send Messages To The Past

Added: 2026-05-26

[00:00:00]Sending messages into the past just got easier. Or as the headlines put it, we figured out a new way to send messages into the past. And physicists say it's possible to send messages backward in time. Even more amazing, these headlines are based on a paper published in PRL, the top journal in the field. As you've guessed correctly, no one's yet figured out how to actually send messages into the past. This is a theoretical study, but it's quite interesting indeed. And no, it doesn't involve a Delorean, a time fairy, or a black hole behind a bookshelf. It just requires a little bit of quantum physics. Let's have a look.

[00:00:42]Quantum physics has an uneasy relation with causality. This is because once you accept that particles can do multiple things at the same time and factor in that Einstein tells us there's no objective way to tell what happens at the same time, then quantum mechanics also tells you that generally you can't tell what happened in which order.

[00:01:04]Causality becomes as uncertain as the rest of quantum physics. And of course, the first question you might have is, can I make money with it? Who wouldn't want to tell their younger self to buy Nvidia stocks without having to grow a wormhole in the basement? The new paper is a continuation of an earlier work. It comes from an MIT group and the scenario they look at is loosely speaking this.

[00:01:29]You have a receiver device that you've built at some time and that's ready to receive messages from the future. Before you build the device, you can't get any messages. Then you have a special quantum state that you prepare and you let it do its quantum thing. And once the quantum state has done its thing, there's a sender who measures the quantum state and that so the idea injects information in the message receiver in the past. In the new paper, they show that this still works if there is noise in this communication channel.

[00:02:04]Amazingly enough, if you want to send messages into the past, the noise is less of a problem than if you want to send it into the future. The authors finished their paper in style, referring to a 1985 paper co-authored by E. Brown and M.

[00:02:22]McFly. Okay, but leaving aside the noise, just what do they say we must do to send messages into the past? They're using what's called post selection. This basically means that after you've done the measurement of the quantum state, you only look at specific outcomes. You see, in quantum physics, we can't normally predict the outcome of an experiment. But they postulate that we basically live in a universe with only one outcome. And then the message that you get sent into the past is the outcome which will happen. Okay. But wait, how is this not just making a prediction? Well, to me, this is the key point of the paper. In general, you can't tell these two things apart.

[00:03:12]Forget the quantum stuff for a moment.

[00:03:14]Imagine that you just sit there with your device that can receive messages from the future. Or so you think. It has a screen and noise flickers on the screen most of the time. Then suddenly it says, "Buy Nvidia." You go buy Nvidia and a year later you're rich. But did you get a message from the future or is your machine just good at predicting the stock market? There's no way to tell these two things apart. I don't know about you, but if I had such a device, I wouldn't care. Physicists could discuss until the end of time whether it does really receive messages from the future or whether it's just crazy good at making predictions. I'll be sitting at the pool. Cheers. That said, in today's reality, we can't predict the outcome of a quantum measurement, and post selection isn't something you can magically enforce on our universe. This means that for practical purposes, their device works more like this. Suppose I set up an ex Twitter account and post 100,000 messages predicting the next major LA earthquake for any possible day until 2100. Then once it happens, I delete all messages but one celebrate the correct prediction and claim that it was given to me by time traveler. Works on X doesn't work in reality. So I have to give this paper an 8 out of 10 on the meter. The maths works out but their interpretation is highly questionable. That's uh the real story here isn't that physicists have invented a working telephone to yesterday. The story is that physicists are slowly rethinking temporal relations, which I think are much more complicated than the simple cause effect idea that we're used to. And if they finally work out how to send messages into the past, I promise I'll have a word with my past self about questionable hairstyle choices. I am very protective of my privacy, but it's become incredibly difficult online when there are a dozen companies tracking you each time you open a website. That's why I'm signed up to Incogn. Incogn is a service that keeps your personal data out of the hands of data brokers. These are companies which collect data about you each time you visit a website and when you fill in information. Then they sell this information off. You can request that they remove your data, but this is incredibly timeconsuming.

[00:05:44]Incogn automates this process. It's very simple. You sign up and they'll contact the big sinners, request that your personal details be removed. They also now have a new custom removal feature where you can submit specific websites.

[00:06:01]If you use my code Zabina or the custom link in the info below, you'll get 60% off of Incogn, which isn't expensive in the first place. That's an amazing deal.

[00:06:13]So, go and check this out. Thanks for watching. See you tomorrow.