Political rhetoric requires historical literacy, as intent can never strip a phrase of its dehumanizing origins or systemic impact. Dismissing such language as a mere oversight only reinforces the structural ignorance that allows these harmful tropes to persist.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Controversy over Kiggans remarks draws renewed attention to language tied to American slaveryAdded:
Well, tonight a political controversy involving Congresswoman Jen Kiggans is drawing renewed attention to a phrase tied to American slavery. During a podcast appearance Monday, Kiggans agreed with the host who used the phrase "cotton-picking hands." Kiggans recently denounced the remark made by the host, but the conversation is extending beyond politics. Leila Cox is in the studio to explain.
Yeah, that's right, Janet. Experts trace the origins of the phrase "cotton-picking hands" to an era of American slavery that emerged from the dehumanization of enslaved Africans forced to pick cotton. So, the question is, does intent overpower historical context when politicians appear to agree with certain remarks?
The first response shouldn't be denied.
It should be an apology.
>> Congresswoman Jen Kiggans is facing criticism after appearing on a podcast.
The host used the phrase "cotton-picking hands" when saying US House of Representatives Minority Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries should stay out of Virginia politics. Kiggans said "ditto," but later stated she was not agreeing with the phrase, but the political sentiment. Critics online quickly condemned the language, saying the phrase evokes painful imagery connected to enslaved black Americans forced to pick cotton throughout the South. It was a part of our society, and it was a part of our justification.
We're a nation that said, "We hold these truths to be self-evident evident that all men are created equal," and yet we had a system that dehumanized millions of people. Dr. Cassandra Newby-Alexander is an endowed professor of Virginia black history and culture at Norfolk State University. She tells 13 News Now over generations, the expression became embedded in American speech despite its historical context tied to racial exploitation. It always emerged out of a system of slavery, out of a system in which black people and black bodies were devalued.
>> While some argue the phrase has sometimes been used colloquially without racial intent, Dr. Newby-Alexander says intent does not erase the phrases derogatory origin. Southernisms are filled with a lot of racial terminologies because the South in some areas was a majority black society. And so these Southernisms were designed to dehumanize the people who were the economic engine of America.
Dr. Newby Alexander stressed the importance of historical memory in politics, particularly in Virginia, where the legacy of slavery continues to shape public life. Leila Cox, 13 News Now.
And Congresswoman Kiggans says her comments should not be interpreted as endorsing racist language. The NAACP Virginia State Conference and Democratic lawmakers are urging Kiggans to apologize.
Related Videos
They Said Flight Was ImpossibleβThen Two Bicycle Mechanics Changed Everything#wrightbrothers
umars997
526 viewsβ’2026-05-30
#SeamansAct1915 #MaritimeHistory #LifeAtSea #BoatShitCrazyX #SaferWorkEnvironment
BoatShitCrazyX
859 viewsβ’2026-06-01
The British Crown Was a Death Sentence
BritanniaAftermath
699 viewsβ’2026-05-31
The Aztecs Paid Taxes With CHOCOLATE π«π
historical_club
899 viewsβ’2026-05-30
Black Women Were Banned From White Suffrage Groups
Peoplediduknow
782 viewsβ’2026-05-31
A Volcano Created Frankenstein β And Killed Summer for a Year
TheDarkSideOfSmth
389 viewsβ’2026-05-29
Born into slavery in Beaufort
RoadsanRoots
613 viewsβ’2026-05-31
50.32 Judah And Israel Split / Jeroboam's False Religion - 2 Chronicles ch. 10-11
smyrnachristianchurchkokomo
107 viewsβ’2026-05-29











