The Makerfield by-election demonstrates how the First Past the Post electoral system, combined with vote splitting between similar parties (Reform UK and Restore Britain), can allow a career politician like Andy Burnham to win with a minority of votes while the opposition parties cancel each other out. This creates a system where established politicians can maintain power through strategic maneuvering rather than genuine popular support, as evidenced by polling showing only 20% of voters would support Burnham if he led the party, yet he could still win through the mechanics of the electoral system.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Rupert Lowe Secret Plan To Replace Keir Starmer Is Now In Motion.Added:
[music] >> And hello everybody. Welcome back to the channel. Look, we need to talk and we need to talk now because while you're busy trying to figure out how to pay the standing charge on your energy bill, the Westminster machine is glitching out right in front of our eyes. We are witnessing a total mask off moment in a place called Makerfield and the mainstream media is trying to dress it up as politics as usual. It isn't. It's a full-blown glitch in the matrix of British democracy.
They told you the last election was about change, didn't they? Starmer stood there with that wooden look on his face and promised a new era. But look at Makerfield. We've got Andy Burnham, the king of the north, the man who's been running Manchester into the ground trying to parachute back into Parliament. Why? Because the vultures are already circling Starmer. This isn't a by-election. It's a leadership coup in slow motion played out on the streets of a northwest town that the establishment usually can't find on a map.
Before we dive into the gritty details of how they're trying to stitch you up, I want to ask you, do you feel the change they promised? Because from where I'm standing, it looks like more of the same. Same faces, same games, same decline. Let me know in the comments right now. Yes or no. Is this government working for you? Because if you think a career politician hopping from a mayor's office back to a green leather bench is progress, I've got a bridge in London to sell you.
Now, to understand why the Makerfield by-election is so dangerous, you have to look at the facts they aren't telling you. You see, in the Westminster bubble, they use words like safe seat and constituency mandate to make it sound like they own the land. But let's break down what a by-election actually means for your pocket. Normally, a by-election happens when an MP quits or well, kicks the bucket. But this, this is strategic.
Burnham is the mayor of Greater Manchester. That's a role created to devolve power, but the moment he smells weakness in Starmer's leadership, he's ditching the mayoralty to get back to the House of Commons. Why? Because you can't be Prime Minister from a town hall in Manchester, you have to be an MP.
This is a man using a local community as a stepping stone.
And let's look at the terminology being thrown around. Vote splitting. You're going to hear this a lot. In our first past the post system, that's the one where the winner takes everything even if 60% of people voted against them, if two parties with similar run against each other, they cancel each other out.
That is exactly what is happening here with Reform UK and Restore Britain.
This isn't just a quirk of the system, it's a tool for national decline. When the right of center vote is split, the established Labour candidate walks through the middle with a minority of the actual support. It's how we end up with leaders nobody actually wants. We are seeing a resource crisis in our politics, too many egos, not enough vision. The result, the hardworking taxpayer in Makerfield gets a representative who is looking over their shoulder at 10 Downing Street instead of looking at the potholes on the high street. Do you think it's right that a mayor can just abandon his post mid-term to chase a bigger promotion in London?
Is that public service or is it just career climbing at your expense?
Let's get into the meat of this because the figures coming out of Makerfield are an absolute disgrace.
I'm looking at the Savanta poll from May 23. Labour is sitting at 43%. Reform UK is at 40%. Now, do the math. If you add Reform's 40% to the support for Restore Britain, party led by Rupert Lowe, the insurgent vote blows Labour out of the water. But here's the shameless gaslighting. The establishment will tell you that Burnham is the strong favorite.
The bookies have him at 4 to 11. They want you to think it's a foregone conclusion so you don't bother showing up. They want you to stay home while they install a former health secretary, the man who presided over some of the most disastrous periods in NHS history, back into the heart of government. Let's look at who's actually standing. You've got Robert Kenyon for Reform. He's a self-employed plumber. Think about that for a second. A plumber versus a career politician who's been on the public payroll since the '90s. The street view here is blindingly obvious. Kenyon knows what it's like to try and get a van through ULEZ zones or pay for materials that have doubled in price because of inflation. Burnham? Burnham is away with the fairies, thinking about his next leadership bid, while the people of Makerfield are worried about the local GP wait times.
And then we have the drama with Restore Britain. Rupert Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, had a spectacular falling out with Nigel Farage and started his own party. Look, I get it. Egos clash. But look at the ripple effect. Rebecca Shepherd is standing for Restore, and she's picking up support on social media. If she takes even 4% of that vote, she hands the keys of Makerfield to Andy Burnham.
I mean, what world are they living in?
How can these patriot parties look at these figures and tell us with a straight face that they are helping the country by fighting each other? They are paving a golden road for Burnham to challenge Starmer. If Burnham wins because the opposition couldn't get their act together, the establishment wins twice. They get a big beast back in the Commons, and they get to laugh at the divided outsiders.
How much longer are we going to let ego-driven politics divide the common sense majority? Are we really going to let a plumber lose to a careerist because two parties couldn't share a stage?
I'm going to say what nobody else is allowed to say. We are being treated like second-class citizens in our own country.
In any other serious nation, look at how they do things in the US or even the emerging economies in the East, a politician who failed as health secretary and then presided over a city with rising crime wouldn't be failing upwards into a leadership bid. They'd be held accountable. But here, in the UK, we give them a by-election and a coronation.
No other country would tolerate this level of blatant opportunism.
Imagine if a governor in the US tried to jump into a random congressional seat just to primary the president. The voters would see right through it. but the UK media is playing along, acting like this is a fascinating tactical battle. It's not tactical, it's cynical.
And let's talk about the woke fringe involved here. We've got the Green Party who had to swap their candidate at the last minute because their first one, Chris Kennedy, withdrew. Then you've got Rejoin EU and the Climate Party. These aren't serious political movements, they are the NGO establishment's little helpers designed to clutter the ballot and distract from the fact that our borders are wide open and our economy is flatlining.
The BMG Research poll says it all. Only 20% of voters would back Labour if Burnham was leading the party. That's 3% behind Reform's national polling. The people don't want Burnham, they don't want Starmer, they want someone who actually lives in the real world. Yet because of the Restore versus Reform civil war, the 20% man might end up as the most powerful person in the country.
Is it now a crime to put our own people first? To say that we need a candidate who cares about Makerfield, not a candidate who uses Makerfield as a prop for a TV interview. The Makerfield by-election is a warning shot. It proves that the establishment, whether it's Starmer's current guard or Burnham's king-in-waiting faction, is completely disconnected from the reality on the ground. They are playing a game of thrones while you're playing a game of how do I survive the month? If Burnham wins on June 18th with a fraction of the vote because the opposition was too busy bickering, don't let them tell you it's a mandate. It's a glitch. It's proof the system is broken and designed to keep the same old faces in power regardless of what the hardworking taxpayer actually wants.
Guys, I've laid it out for you, but I want to hear from you. Am I being too harsh on Burnham or is this exactly what you're seeing in your town? Is the split vote the biggest threat to real change?
Smash the like button, hit subscribe so we can keep fighting the narrative, and I'll see you in the next one. Don't let them
Related Videos
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29
Potential Iran deal is 'a big defeat' for US: John Bolton | Elizabeth Vargas Reports
NewsNation
1K views•2026-05-29
Russia Clashes With Romania, U.S. And EU At Security Council Meeting | DWS News | AC1F
dwsofficial
344 views•2026-06-02
Independence Calendar (Episode #25) - With Cory Morgan & Keith Wilson
JohnBoltonAB
3K views•2026-05-31
BREAKING: TRUMP ADMITS HE LIED ON CIA
DarrenMonroePolitics
10K views•2026-06-01
Why Reynosa Is Burning Now: The Truth Explained
THEFACTFACTORYF
560 views•2026-05-30











