In criminal court, violating court orders such as drug testing conditions while on bond results in immediate and severe consequences, including bond increases and potential incarceration. Judges consider the full pattern of a defendant's behavior, including prior criminal history, jail disciplinary records, and repeated disrespect for authority, when determining whether to grant probation or impose prison sentences. A guilty plea requires genuine accountability and understanding of the crime, not just accepting a convenient deal.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
“What About My Child?” — Judge West Responds After Shocking Drug Test!追加:
Good morning.
Good morning. Are you Melissa Taylor?
>> Yes, ma'am. What do you have on your Oh, this is my son, Brandon Taylor. Uh-huh.
Why'd you wear that this morning?
Because he's he's my entire world and he's missing his dad.
Okay.
Ms. Taylor, this is your initial No, you were here before. Did you get someone hired? Ma'am? Did you get someone hired?
>> No, I have contacted them four different times. I have a printout that we were given all the information. They're extremely expensive.
I'm not going to be able to get the funds gathered for that.
>> Who'd you talk to? Um I spoke to a young >> [snorts] >> Where? In my office there.
Where did you >> Right there in my office.
Okay.
Did you Did you talk to someone since that last court date?
The last hearing. Uh-huh. And you asked me to turn in the paperwork within three weeks. Uh-huh. [clears throat] That is what I did. And I couldn't get that turned in after um Okay. If I test you this morning, you got anything in your system?
Have a seat in the jury box.
We're going to test.
Ms. Taylor, you tested positive for amphetamines, methamphetamines, and ecstasy. And just like that, the courtroom mood changes fast. The positive test for methamphetamines and ecstasy while out on bond, that is one of the quickest ways to lose a judge's trust. Bond conditions are not suggestions. They're court orders, and violating them can send everything downhill in seconds. See.
Um and so at this time, I'm going to find that that is a violation, obviously, of your bond conditions, and I'm going to raise your bond in your case to $100,000. Well, let me look at it real quick. I'm going to Let's see.
In one of your cases, you're charged with assault on a peace officer, the other credit or debit card abuse. In each of those cases, I'm raising your bond to $100,000 in each case. If you make the bonds in those cases, you are ordered to wear a drug patch at all time, get it tested at the appropriate times, and then we will move forward with your case.
>> Can I ask you a question, please? Mhm.
Am I about to be arrested in Yes, you're going to into custody right now. Okay.
This moment hits hard. When Melissa asks, "Am I about to be arrested?" and the answer is simply, "Yeah." That one word changes everything. And when a child is involved, judges get even stricter. The court's message here is clear. If you're responsible for a child, your decisions carry even heavier consequences. I have a child.
You shouldn't be using ecstasy and methamphetamine if you have a child. You can go back with the bailiff. Go back with the bailiff right now. Go back with the bailiff.
Go with the bailiff.
My child is missing, and the police won't Good morning, sir. You're Denzel Lewis?
And Mr. Lewis, you were previously in court entered a plea of guilty to the third-degree felony offense of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. Uh the agreement was for a cap of 6 years in prison. I've received the pre-sentence report. Has everyone had an opportunity to review that report?
>> Yes, your honor. Yes, sir. Are there any additions or corrections?
Uh just argument from the defense.
>> Nothing to state. Um in addition, I have received the jail incident reports, which have been turned over to counsel.
Have you both had an opportunity to review those?
>> I have.
Um also, I have received this morning and now reviewed it looks like four letters of support that Ms. Holmes brought today. Mr. Smith, have you had an opportunity to review those as well?
All right, then Ms. Holmes, you may proceed. Thank you, Your Honor.
>> [laughter] >> Um in looking at the PSI report, Mr. Lewis does have obviously previous criminal history spanning from juvenile and to adulthood.
The prior offense that he has it appears was burglary of a habitation.
It looks like three cases but they weren't they ran concurrently >> [snorts] >> in which he was placed on probation and had a revocation in which he was sentenced to eight years in TDC.
He has since been discharged from that, Your Honor.
And after being released, there was this traffic stop which resulted in a firearm being found in the vehicle in which Mr. Lewis was driving.
Obviously, in reading his response to the PSI officer, I would allow him to elaborate more on that. Obviously, he did plead guilty to the offense taking responsibility and we are seeking probation in this case, Your Honor.
We believe that at this point in Mr. Lewis's life, he understands obviously being incarcerated before that it's not somewhere that he wants to go back and spend potentially six additional years of his life. He would like this opportunity on probation to have that opportunity to spend and get back on track with employment to take care of his family and provide for his family.
In reading those support letters, Your Honor, he does have support here from family and friends in the community that are willing to step up and help him to make sure that he is a productive citizen and he gets back on track. He understand [clears throat] that there is just certain things with being a convicted felon that he cannot do. And I think at this point he understands that, your honor, and we are asking that the court give him the opportunity to be placed on probation and to finish his term while on probation.
Well, I guess before we go any further, I want to make sure I understand because Mr. Um Lewis your version of this is that it wasn't your gun, it was in your girlfriend's purse, and you didn't even know her purse was in the car, much less the gun was in the purse in the car. So, it either you are guilty or not guilty of the offense. And so, you if you knew about it, then you're guilty. If you didn't, then a jury needs to decide. I'm pleading guilty because I was driving the car and by me driving and then finding a gun, they they the I But the law But the law That's not what the law is. That's not what the law is.
>> Okay? So, you don't get to just take a deal or plead guilty because that's what you want to do. Now, this is a major legal reality check. The judge is basically saying, "You don't plead guilty just because it feels easier." In criminal court, a guilty plea means you are admitting the crime, not just accepting bad luck. If he truly didn't know the gun was there, that's a trial issue, not a shortcut plea.
When you [snorts] were here before, you stood in front of that clerk, you put your hand up, swore that you were telling the truth, and I said, "Are you pleading guilty freely and voluntarily?
Are you pleading guilty because you did what they charged you with?"
>> And I still am.
Okay.
All right, Mr. Smith.
Uh Judge I think he's been given probation before.
Uh it was not successful. He's been a model.
Actions in the jail clearly show he doesn't have any respect for authority or rules. I don't feel like he's a proper candidate for probation, so we're asking for a 6-year sentence in TDC.
So, Mr. Lewis, one thing I noticed in several of these letters that friends and family members said, I think three of them actually used the word respectful, that you're a respectful young man.
What has been going on in our jail is the furthest thing from respectful that I've seen.
>> [clears throat] >> The number of times, and the fact that I have to say this out loud, the number of times that you choose to masturbate And wow, this hearing takes a sharp turn. Those jail incident reports absolutely destroyed the respectful young man argument. Support letters can help, but jail behavior speaks louder than paper.
When the judge starts reading disciplinary reports out loud like this, you already know probation is slipping away. in front in front of the officers on purpose is ridiculous.
That must be going to be a lie.
Sure. That case wasn't on me. Somebody else had a case, and the woman even talked to the lieutenant to get it removed up off of my file, but it still shows up. There was There was not on me.
It was somebody >> It's more than one time. But I'm [clears throat] saying So, hold on. So, on April 4th, let's just go through them. On April 14th, you were in trouble for not being in your bunk, that you had been given several orders to go to your bunk.
You proceeded to walk around yelling, "Bitch, stop talking to me." So, that's from April 14th, last week.
Then, on April 7th, it alleges that you had your hands in your pants [clears throat] moving in and out back and forth.
That you were told to take your hands out of your pants and that you had been told before or this officer had been briefed on the fact that you were known for doing this.
Your response, according to this, is that that person should have asked the officers how big your penis, I'm not anyway.
>> [clears throat] >> Since they want to be talking about you, they should have told them about that, too.
Then, on March 25th, before that, a week, uh to another officer. And these aren't the same officers, it's not the same person saying the same thing about you.
Somebody has something to against you.
So, March 25th, started to do rounds, noticed that you were watching the person doing rounds, had his hand over his midsection as if he was rubbing on himself.
March 18th, another different officer, noticed monitoring the bunk. There you are laying on your back stroking your penis in a back and forth motion, told not to do so.
January 24th, 2025, you're in trouble for not walking around for walking around This one, noticed the way you're laying on your bunk in a way making motions under the blanket, uh walked past, turned around to see if you were still doing it. Then, you supposedly look at this officer and say, "I'm not doing anything." while you lifted the blanket up for that officer to see it.
Um January 4th, another time uh being told to uh be quiet, do what you're supposed to do, didn't do it that day.
Jan- uh December 29th, another issue of not following the rules.
December 17th, another infraction for um arguing and not following the rules. So, if there was one time when they got the wrong person, that's one thing. That's over and over again. You disrespecting female officers who are in there just doing their job. I don't sleep on my bed.
Sir, I don't know.
>> you really We're really going to do that?
You asked me and I'm telling you, Judge, I sleep on my bed. Uh-huh. I have sisters. I have a mama. I don't do that.
Them people write whatever they >> They're making this up on you. That's terrible of them to do that.
>> at my cases with pulling them up. I don't have any cases. I don't know I don't have any time. I'm not on no restriction or none of that Okay. up in the county. You were off parole the way I do the math, less than a year.
>> So, you did your whole 8 years?
>> What'd you do in prison to have to do your whole 8 years? I was in seg.
For doing what?
Just tattooing, uh contraband. Not following the rules while you're in prison.
I'm going to find that you previously entered your plea of guilty freely and voluntarily. Find sufficient evidence to find you guilty and at this time find you guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm by felon. Sentence you to a term of 6 years in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Corrections.
6 years in prison. Final. No probation.
No second chances today. The judge makes it crystal clear. This wasn't just about the gun. It was about the pattern.
Prison history, parole issues, jail behavior, and repeated disrespect for authority. Courtrooms don't just judge one mistake. They judge the full story.
You will receive credit on that sentence for any time that you've been in custody that the law gives you the right to receive.
I'm handing you the trial court certification that shows this was an agreement that I followed and so you've waived your right to appeal and you're lucky that this was the agreement. Mr. Smith was generous. The fact is this you could have been enhanced to a second-degree felony because of your history and you're lucky you weren't. I have also handed you a written admonishment regarding your ineligibility to possess a firearm or ammunition. Obviously, you know this, but I'm required to read this to you.
Because of the judgment entered against you, you're ineligible under Texas law to possess a firearm or ammunition.
Possession of a firearm or ammunition could lead to charges against you.
Firearm is a legal term and you should read the written admonishment I provided you to see what devices qualify as a firearm.
If you have questions about the laws that make you ineligible to possess a firearm or ammunition or about how long it lasts, you can talk
関連おすすめ
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











