This case exposes a systemic failure where political narratives are prioritized over factual integrity, deeply undermining public trust in institutional impartiality. It serves as a sobering critique of how "two-tier" justice risks dismantling the foundational principle of equality before the law.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
'Two-tier politicians EXPOSED' after Bulgarian schoolgirl attackers in viral axe video found guilty
Added:A 12-year-old Scottish girl pulled out a knife and axe to defend her little sister after a Bulgarian pervert, Ilia Bellof, approached four young girls, saying, "Hello, sexy. I'll show you a good time." Well, he pushed the 12-year-old to the ground and assaulted her. His sister, Nadja, dragged and assaulted a 13-year-old girl, and only then did the girl produce any weapons, shouting, "Don't effing touch her. She's effing 12. Bellof filmed it himself and tried to play the victim card when he posted the video. The story, of course, went viral around the world. And here's what former SMP First Minister Hamza Ysef said at the time. But of course, Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson, and others sympathizers of the far right begin to spread misinformation that flies around the world like wildfire. that these young this young girl was defending her sister from a man who wanted to sexually a migrant sorry who wanted to sexually assault her and of course that's why we needed all Pakistanis Muslims uh and people of color out of this country uh was then uh what was followed on of course none of that was true the police put out a statement yesterday saying that a Bulgarian couple so European migrants were approached by the youths not the other way around >> well that's a shame for putting that video out because uh that pervert you quick to defend Hamza. Ilia Bellov has now been found guilty and so has his sister who aided him. Scottish police called this story misinformation when it first came out. The BBC and the Guardian said there was no evidence for the allegations, citing the police.
Politicians implied the girl was a liar.
Anyone who questioned the narrative was smeared as racist and far right, weren't they? And after the conviction, of course, Chief Superintendent Ela Loe admitted this. I recognize the initial information did not fully reflect the situation. So the police spread misinformation about this story. Am I getting that right? Is that what happened? Well, John Swinny, now first minister of course, also indulged in a little bit of misinformation at the time.
But what is very important is that police Scotland have issued a warning about deliberate misinformation that is being used to stoke up fear and alarm in our communities and I am concerned about that and everybody should be concerned about that.
Well, look, we we all know what really happened, don't we? The establishment rushed to protect their political narrative over they put it over innocent children. People like Hamza Ysef wanted to make it all about the far right and anti-migrant misinformation as they'd call it when people were making the criticism were right all along, weren't they? They weren't far right, they were just right. This is all reminiscent of the same attitude that led to the cover up of Pakistani rape gangs if you ask me. And it's the same DEI infected institutions as well, isn't it? the same anti-white racism that saw innocent girls as the criminals once again and dangerous migrants as the victims. It is another example of two-tier policing, two-tier media, two-tier politicians being exposed once again. When will they learn that the truth will always catch up to them?
>> I'm joined now by the founder and CEO of Tally Money, Cameron Perry. So what is tally money and what does it do?
>> So uh you get an everyday account in your individual name you get an account number and sort code uh but instead of having an account denominated in pound sterling uh with your bank you have milligs of gold which we brand as tally.
The reason why we chose gold everybody understands gold. It's universally understood and accepted. It's been increasing at over 11% on average for the last 25 years against the pound. In the last two years it's up 60% against the pound. So if you had, you know, £10,000 in a tally account 2 years ago, it's now got £16,000 worth of value. The gold hasn't changed, but the value and your purchasing power has. So banks can't keep up with that performance.
>> How easy is it to get a Tally Money account? Then >> um if you're a UK resident, it's really easy. Uh just go to your uh go to your app store, download the app. Uh you'll need photo ID, you can on board yourself in a couple of minutes, >> just your passport, your driving license.
>> Yep. And you're up and away. So you know what you're getting. It's very simple uh low fees. Um it's transparent. There's no hidden fees. There's no effect spreads depending on the amount you put in. And you just get to go go ahead and be productive in your daily life. Build up your savings again because it's useful to do it. Now >> I was going to say so you're not you don't necessarily if people are watching this going oh it sounds a bit scary. You can open a tally money account transfer.
Is there a minimum amount you have to transfer?
>> So you might think I'm just going to play with this. I'm going to put 100 quid in it that I've got this month and I'm either going to spend it and see if I feel like I'm getting more value for money from my sale from the things that I'm buying or I'm going to save it and watch how that compares to maybe 100 quid in your current account to find out more and to get an exclusive GB news offer. Simply scan the QR code or click the link in the description.
>> Let's talk about this with my panel tonight. Reform UK's London Meril candidate Ila Cunningham, campaigns director at the Taxpayers Alliance, William Yarwood, and political commentator Sebastian Salic. Um Ila, I'll start with you. This uh this story when it first came out, the the left were so quick to jump on people questioning the narrative. They were questioning what would they had seen that video that had been put up online and they were all smeared. There was so many people smeared by leftwing politicians. Now that the video's come out, the the truth has come out, they all look really stupid, don't they?
>> And I wonder if they're going to apologize to the young girl and then everyone that they smeared. But what's funny, you say that the truth will always come out. Well, will it? Now they want to censor everything we have in our phone has to go, you know, you know, in times of civil unrest, you know, the online safety bill that was meant to protect children. Well, it's not actually protecting children. It's uh censoring this kind of information and protecting uh the government from the public. Um, and we have to fight it with everything we can. I mean, awful that that girl was smeared like that. People who said uh everything about it. How many stories it's every kind of the same situation with Henry Novak.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Again, you're all wrong. This is again, this is coming from the police who I I I can't understand why the CCTV footage they saw was different from the one that was seen by the courts. But the court has obviously looked at this and they said about this guy's defense. They said it was it was implausible in so many words, will implausible about when it came to him defending himself against these little girls. That that was what he was saying. They were attacking him.
>> Yeah. And it's also it's him trying to play the victim, right? You know, trying to get out of this in any way he possibly can. And I actually agree with Ila. I want every politician, every individual from the BBC, from the Guardian, from other news outlets to actually retract what they said and apologize. Apologize straight up. Um because also they talk about disinformation. And it was they it was that lot who were spreading disinformation about this issue instead of waiting for the facts to come out and the court to make its decision. And they constantly say people on the right do that kind of stuff all the time, but actually these guys are just as bad as the people they claim to be spreading disinformation.
>> But we don't spread disinformation.
>> Yeah. Well, of course not.
>> So, um I'll put this over to you because I think the biggest problem with this story is if that is that as soon as anyone suggested that the migrant actually was not the victim, he was the criminal, they were smeared. I see these these tweets all day long. People are surfacing from a year ago now where people were calling people racist, far right, and it's that smearing that really inflames the tension of the situation. That's what I take massive issue with. I also take issue with the fact that the police seem to choose when they want to intervene on cases. They choose, they chose to intervene in this case, to release information to the public that said these stories you're putting out is misinformation. But they don't do that with many other cases. And that's why people are again talking about two-tier policing, two-tier politics, which I think is causing a massive division in our society.
>> Yeah. I mean, look, firstly, I'm glad that the truth has come out and and that justice has taken its course in this way. It would have been terrible if if that hadn't happened and we'd seen a miscarriage. Um, which would have been would have been awful. Um, look, I think that division is already there. Uh, it's it's not being caused by stories like this. It's being uh inflamed by them.
Um, I'm very careful about talking about the left does this, the right says this because you have to be specific. You have to call out people or groups of people. You can't talk about broad sways of ideology. Um, yes, there will have been individuals who jump to conclusions and got it wrong. I think there's a big lesson in here there for all of us, especially those of us who come on television and commentate on issues that are often playing out uh to make sure we get our facts straight. And um, look, I think the Henry Novak case was a good example of that as well because um, we didn't really know what happened at the beginning yet. We were all trying to pass judgment. What do you make of >> how long was she accused of of of being how long was he >> until until the court made their judgment? So from the moment she she was charged with weapons with with with carrying offensive weapons. And I will say this to anyone watching. We don't condone any children carrying weapons or anybody carrying a knife. I've made that really clear when I was talking about the Henry Novan case. Nobody should walk around with weapons. But of course, the story here is about a man who approached these girls, made sexualized comments about them, and then of course he's been charged with being the aggressor here, not the girl. I >> I think that the problem is is that politicians try and manipulate the truth to suit an ideology or to suit a narrative. And that's really dangerous because we really want politicians to just look at the facts um and state them how they are. And and I don't I and I and you know, it it's so div we're so divided right now. you know, the left somehow see everything through the lens of race and um unfairness and um and it's got to stop. You've got to see that a young girl was potentially um assaulted by a migrant and that's not a narrative. These things do happen.
Migrants are coming into the country and sexually assaulting young girls. It's not a narrative. It is led by data. It is not a prejudice. It is not being bigoted. It is bed by it is led by factual data that we see. And and I think it's about time that the left or whoever, left or not, you're right. It's about time that politicians that deny this truth and call anyone who calls it out as racist or bigoted, they've got to stop. They've got to acknledge.
>> Did you see how you're doing exactly what you've just warned against? You said we mustn't wield these cases to serve our narratives. And you've used this story to jump off and to make a point about how migrants are coming and attacking or raping people. That's wrong.
>> No, it's not because it's true. But all people sadly of all races and all colors and all beliefs attack and rape people and that's really upsetting. But it is you're wrong to zero in on a particular group.
>> And one of those groups are migrants.
Will you admit or no?
>> Yes. I'm saying I'm saying specifically all people which includes migrants and includes not migrants.
>> All people. I don't sexually assault young girl.
>> No. No. But people from all groups do.
>> Some are more prevalent than others and some don't have to be in the country.
>> Okay. So who are you saying is particularly prevalent? Well, I'm I'm I'm attacking people who are let into this country, offered everything that we are, welcomed into this country, and they feel that they have uh uh the right to sexually assault young people.
>> I would agree about that. It's obviously wrong. But but to to turn this into a political point, we agree on that, but but you're trying to turn this into a political point.
>> What political point am I turning it?
>> What what I understand you're saying is that therefore we must be hostile towards migrants or we must limit migrants or >> Yes, we must limit migrants because we have migrants that come into this country. Yeah, >> that feel that they can sexually assault young girls and that is wrong.
>> But why must all migrants lose out as a result of those those horrible horrible minorities?
>> Illegal migrants for sure must not come in. But we do not have an effective filtering system and we've let in men who sexually assault young girls. That's it. And and the sooner you admit it and we stop it, perhaps the country will be less divisive.
>> But the problem is some of these people Go on.
>> Yeah. I I just want to bring Will back into the conversation. Um and talk about two-tier policing as well, right?
because we can get into a very very long debate about migration and actually I want to talk the broader the broader strokes here is about the hypocrisy it's about treat different treatment of people and again I think this is another two-tier policing case in my opinion the police decided to release information at the time they don't do that with many cases where they say this is misinformation they don't do that very often they have done it on this case they also were prejudiced against the young girl they they they again with because of their statements early on in the case it led to a bunch of politicians coming out going oh you're all racist and bigoted far right is Is this a case again of two-tier policing?
Does it show that the DEI virus is so deep inside that institution that goes back years? Well, it's not just deep inside the public sector institution of the police. It's deep inside the public sector more broadly. I mean, due to the Equality Act and due to various pieces of legislation passed by the last Conservative government, loads of public sector organizations have equity laws.
They have inclusion practices. There's obviously been an explosion in EDI offices across the public sector in Whiteall in the police. And of course, that makes them think and act in a certain way. And also even if the public sector workers in any case don't want to act in that kind of way the laws that are in place and the pressures that are put upon them makes them act in that way even if they don't want to. So I think it is deeply embedded Alex and I think actually in order to get back to uh an equal and fair treatment under the law or in you know the healthare service or whatever it might be. I think actually a lot of this stuff needs to be ripped out from top to bottom. Yeah. And I think this is the point right. Everyone wants to live in a society where we're all equals. Yeah. And I and I believe in equality not equity. I think equity gives certain groups more privilege than others and you can't have equality if you have equity. It doesn't it doesn't work that way.
>> Is this part of the ideological problem inside institutions that I think has is obviously existed under the Tories as well. So this is critical about them as that. But it is also it does thrive mostly from leftwing ideology where certain groups should get privileges because of their skin color, their race, their background which is identity politics at the end of the day.
>> So I do believe in equity rather than equality.
>> Why do you believe that? Uh because people start from different places in life. And and >> you think so? Of course.
>> You don't think you don't think that a a white workingclass kid and a brown working-class kid have the similar life?
>> They have similar uh experiences in that they're both working class, but they have different uh experiences in that one person might be treated differently based on the color of their skin.
>> But but you're assuming that they all do. They that that brown white working-class person might have lived a perfectly a reasonable life.
>> Oh, of course they could. If you ask most brown people, they would tell you that they've had experiences that were negative because of the color.
>> And if you ask most white working-class people, they feel that they've been left behind. Now, >> you know, so two two wrongs don't make a right.
>> Sure, but that that is more of a societal issue rather than an ethnic one.
>> No, no, it is it is right now it is a legislative one in that we are prior we are deprioritizing the rights of white working-class.
>> I understand that. But what I'm trying to say is that white working-class people are very likely unlikely to have had racist abuse. No, but they might have had why why that's the problem. We assume that racism flows only one way and a white working-class person must always be the oppressor and never reality dominant white does and never a victim of racism. This is the problem.
White people can suffer from racism. Can you say that? Can you admit that?
>> I think it's incredibly rare in this country. Do you know in a majority white country, you are the default if you are white as you are the default if you're man or whatever.
>> I've got to leave it there. I think just my final thoughts on that and you're obviously very entitled to your opinion.
We are a free speech channel. That my my thoughts on that are that we're seeing now the reser because of equity. We're seeing the reversal. The pendulum has swung too far. That's led to cases like Henry Nov where they didn't believe he'd been stabbed. I think because he was white. That's my interpretation of it.
And I think this little girl wasn't believed because she was a white little girl. And I think again if we go back to the Pakistani rape gangs, same situation there. And I believe you can you cannot treat people some groups more privileged than others because all you do is create more inequality and just sorry we're going to go why is the consequence of that let's scrapple DEI >> because we could just be equals I think we aren't we are now in a hypothetical world that would be beautiful you're saying we should never be equal we should see conduct all right well look I've got to leave it there cuz we've already run over and I'm going to get told off it's on my first day back I'm getting told offices.
Related Videos
Communist manifesto was written by Marks and ?
ApnaHistoryOfficial
1K views•2026-06-16
Churches Were Preaching To Make Money | Michael Jones Inspiring Philosophy Speakers corner
LilLaaHilHamd
140 views•2026-06-14
Mandukya Upanishad | Day 52 | Swami Nikhilananda Saraswati
swami.nikhilananda.saraswati
119 views•2026-06-17
The Moral Ethics of Hamsterdam - The Wire
TheShowiest
1K views•2026-06-19
Discovering Better Logics in a Binary World | Dr. Tamice Spencer-Helms | TNE Podcasts
thenewevangelicalspodcast
148 views•2026-06-15
The Person You Protect Does Not Exist
TheChopraWell
1K views•2026-06-16
The Most Honest Lucid Dreaming Video I've Ever Made
luciddreamingteacher
153 views•2026-06-20
June 16, 2026
nickcbarr
1K views•2026-06-16











