The European Union has implemented policies that criminalize factual political speech about migration and racial differences, as demonstrated by the conviction of Belgian activist Dre von Logenhov for presenting scientific data on migration's impact on crime and quality of life. This represents a system where truth is no defense, and the EU is actively working to prevent Europeans from discussing or implementing remigration policies, even banning European identitarian leaders from attending conferences. The Remigration Summit in Portugal and the newly formed Institute for Remigration represent organized efforts to address what proponents describe as the Great Replacement, with the goal of establishing European ethnic and cultural continuity through evidence-based policy development.
Identity Politics (Ep. 122): URGENT: European Patriots Under Attack (livestream)Hinzugefügt:
going to level with you guys. We got a lot to talk about and we got a lot to talk about things that are happening right now. We got a developing situation with the European Union. We got a developing situation with this remigration summit. Now, normally I prepare these things with at least some notes or at least something in advance.
But this is a developing situation. So, I talked to Jerry Taylor a little earlier today. He's over there in Europe right now. He's in Portugal. In Portugal, there's this big remigration summit right now. And I got the latest with the situation in Europe. I wish I was there, frankly, but I think it was important to do this from here without any interruptions. And I think Jared can hold down the fort by himself on the mother continent. And to start off with something good, there is going to be one very big surprise that a lot of the media here is going to be freaking out about in the next day or two. So, you'll definitely want to pay attention to that. So, pay attention to the remigration summit right now because something big is going to happen here and everyone is going to lose their mind. But we're not going to talk about that tonight because we got to talk about something a little bit more serious and a little bit more concerning because we always talk about like what if what if what if someday we're going to do something? Someday they're going to cross some line and we're going to be in real tyranny. Like no kidding. Yeah, this is the USSR. Not like the USSR, not USSR type stuff. Like no, the USSR.
Helen Andrews made this point when she was reviewing a book about the late USSR. We're already past the point where we can say that we're really better off.
We're different. Now, do we live like under Stalin or something like that? No, of course not. That would be a ridiculous thing to say. But do we live better than we did under say Breznv or like better than the Germans did under the East German Stazzy? Are we better off? No. Absolutely not. It's not even close. I mean, say what you will. I'd say it's worse. Say what you will about the Warsaw Pact, but you didn't get population replacement. You didn't get the open celebration of social degeneracy and crime and squalor and kids getting taken away from their parents to be turned into [ __ ] or judges saying we aren't allowed to punish violent criminals because they're too stupid to be held accountable. Like even the Warsaw Pack didn't pull that.
And by the way, isn't it funny when IQ exists and when it doesn't under our wonderful liberal democracy? What does the West have going for it? We have more stuff. we have a better economy. But even that's not true. The American economy is not really working for most people. But the American economy is a miracle compared to what's going on in Europe. It's not even in the same league. And the European economy is a disaster because European leaders on purpose destroyed their sources of cheap energy and made it impossible to start businesses and implemented all these climate measures that destroyed the quality of life for the people even though it's undone by what India or China does in a day. So over there, you get no freedom. You get replaced. You get this creeping destruction of public spaces and institutions. And you don't even get money. You don't even get a good economy anymore.
Now, what do you call tyranny? Because again, I'm not a libertarian. I favor a strong state. I'm not a classical liberal. So when you say, "Oh, well, I'm opposed to tyranny." Well, what do I mean by tyranny? Let's actually get down to it. What's a definition to it? What's something we can apply universally, as ambitious as that sounds? I'd say this.
when you are required to say something that everybody involved knows to be untrue. And I want to be precise here. I don't mean like, oh, you have to burn a pinch of incense to the emperor because he's divine like the Romans tried to do with the Christians or you have to go to the state church once in a while. No, I don't mean some other worldly thing that you have to rely on faith to even discuss or like nobody knows for sure or something like that. I mean something temporal, worldly facts you are required to deny in order for the system to operate on because it runs on lies. The Soviet system didn't work because it forced people at every stage of it to report things and say things and operate on figures that everybody knew were lies, goods that weren't produced, things that weren't built, quotas that weren't met. And you can uphold a system like that more or less indefinitely based on terror. People don't like to admit that, but you can. But then you have tyranny. That's what it is. And more importantly perhaps once the authorities have lost the will to impose that terror the whole thing collapses now are we nearing that point in Europe years ago I remember I was at some conference where Peter Brimllo and you know Peter Brimlo former editor of national review founder of Vair bestselling author of alien nation which basically began the current debate on immigration in the United States. He said the American system or really the broader western system could collapse because we're based on essentially the same reason that the Soviet system did.
We are required to operate based on lies. Even in America, you are required by law to operate as if all groups are going to perform equally. And if they do not, the only permissible explanation is discrimination. You have to do this. If you run a business, if you're deciding whether schools are going to get funding, if you're looking at crime statistics or healthcare or any public policy. I mean, in this country now, they are trying to or have already gotten rid of things like tracking gunshots or posting mug shots or going after fraud, costing taxpayers millions of dollars because we would rather lie about who's committing these acts than stop them. But also because we're basically required to act this way by law, but in America, we can at least talk about it. Well, you know, not in the workplace, of course. Not in any public places. You tell the truth in the workplace, that's a hostile climate. not in government but you know privately and online which isn't nothing. It's not great but it isn't nothing. We can tell the truth quietly about these kinds of things. We can tell the truth here for example and they may try to censor us and get a fire to try to kill us but the state itself can't directly censor us but in Europe it doesn't work that way.
So this is what we need to talk about tonight. Consider the situation being faced by Dre von Logenhov in Belgium.
Now you know Dre. He's a nationalist for Fllanders I hasten to add. not the phony country of Belgium. Conservative activist, former elected official, leader of a youth group. He's not some marginal figure. This is a former elected official. And then when we spoke at American Renaissance a few years ago, he has already been sentenced to prison because eight years ago in a chat that he moderated, other people posted memes in a private chat. That's enough for prison because that chat was infiltrated under false pretenses by state funded media. And the government ruled that because of the hate spread by these memes, which no one would have even known about without the journalists that they themselves funded, he has to go to prison. Endless hearings and fines and everything else on top of that. You can imagine Stephen Spielberg making some feature film or Netflix doing, you know, based on a true story where you have some tyrannical regime and there are guys in a bar or something and one guy tells a joke about the government and someone who's just sitting there who didn't even tell the joke or maybe didn't even laugh at it. He gets arrested and the theme would be like this is fascism. It could happen here.
This is tyranny. Can you believe it? No.
This is the law now in the so-called free world in Belgium. And who is responsible? who made it happen. The same sort of people who babble endlessly about saving democracy and fighting fascism and all the rest of it. The journalists, the academics, the bureaucrats, the NGO workers, the cucked clergy, all these people who can't stop crying crocodile tears every time some illegal alien rapist stubs his toe. But I promise you, they think this is great.
They love this. I mean, how did mainstream media cover this case at the time? all the journalists, right? The free press, the defenders of democracy, the heroic check on state power that we all depend on. This was at the time, Yahoo, a Belgian court sentences a prominent far-right activist to one year in prison for spreading hate. And conservative Fox News, yeah, Belgian far-right activist sentenced to one year in jail for racist speech. Politico Europe, Belgium's far-right prodigy, gets prison term for inciting violence.
He didn't even say anything. And by the way, one of the groups flapping the wrist about how wonderful this is and how we need more of it. The Human Rights League. Of course, your human rights don't include free speech. But that wasn't enough. That wasn't enough for this insane government, which rules over the capital of the EU, by the way, Brussels. And I've been to Brussels.
It's just a Muslim slum at this point.
This from the Brussels signal, but this is the same what everybody else is reporting. This is all over the place.
Quote, "A Belgian court has convicted right-wing activist Dre Van Lagenhov of hate speech for a lecture in which he presented data and arguments about racial differences, migration, and gender. The correctional court of first instance and Lyven ruled that Van Lagenhov violated Belgium's anti-racism law and gender equality law during a February 2024 lecture at KU Luven, one of Flanders' leading universities. Van Logenhov was found guilty on two counts under Belgium's 1981 anti-racism law.
incitement to hatred or violence against a group on grounds of nationality, so-called race, skin color, origin or ethnic descent, charge A, and dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or racial hatred, charge C.
He was acquitted on the gender related charge. Now, Dre himself said the following and he highlights the critical thing and you're not going to believe this, but this is what happened. So, this is Dre. In February 2024, I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence. Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict. Quote, "Even if all of the statements made by Von Loenhov are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent."
Von Loenhov is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the anti-racism law.
Andre continues, "That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth." Even the regime media write, "It did not matter to the court that Van Lugenhov was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Lugenho's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages, and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration. You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in that first sentence. But in reality, they are warning people. Even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I were to accept their crazy dystopic law, I still did not break it. The only argument they present is that I created a hostile atmosphere of us versus them in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument, which is not even a punishable offense, is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred, and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration.
My enemy is thus not the migrants themselves, but those orchestrating the mass migration." So here's the key, and again, I worked for American Renaissance. Less than a month ago, Jared Taylor gave a speech at a University of Maryland talking about racial reality. Was sponsored by the college Republicans. The college Republicans were talking about here.
Hard line, right? And even that speech was probably a bit more hardline than anything Dre said. But I don't think I need to emphasize to you guys that Jared Taylor is not exactly one to go outside the facts or engage in hyperbole or anything like that. I mean, this isn't exactly a secret here, and he's over in Europe, so I can't get in trouble for this. It's not exactly a secret that compared to me, he's extremely moderate.
And compared to most of you, I'm extremely moderate. The question is, should he go to jail? Because had he given that exact same speech in Europe, he'd be in jail right now. That is the policy in Europe right now. That is the law. And here's the key. The truth is no defense.
If you say something like IQ tests show differences between different racial groups, that is a factual statement.
You're not even saying that it's inherent or biological. There are many reasons that people say these differences exist other than inherent differences. The test could be biased.
They could be culturally biased. It could be a question of nutrition. It could be a question of measuring the wrong kind of intelligence. Maybe IQ isn't a useful measure. I don't agree with these things, but these are reasonable objections, right? But what you can't deny is that these differences according to IQ tests exist. They exist.
This is objectively true regardless of what anyone says about it. As do differences in the amount of violent crime committed by different groups. As do differences in the financial impact, as do many other differences. You can argue about the root causes all you want, but the differences are real. And you can't even say that now. Unless, of course, you're using these differences to explain why Europeans need to pay non-Europeans more money, then it's okay. And that's the real key. It's not just that truth is no defense, which I would define as the essence of tyranny.
It's actually way worse than that. It's that the law itself requires mind readading explicitly. It's entirely subjective. In which case, why bother having any legal proceedings at all?
What do I mean by this? How does this work? You make a claim. The claim is true. We're not even going to argue about whether the claim is true. It's factually true, but it's still legal.
And because in a democracy we all lie and sneak around, you know what terms like the law really entail. Let's be clear what it means by illegal. It means that some hysterical female judge or whoever can have men with guns take away your money, separate you from your family, and send you to prison. And what's the justification for that?
Because even though you told the truth, and this is the standard, you did it to promote hate.
Now wait a minute. How do you know that I did it to promote hate? Well, I'm the judge. I just know. I can read your mind. Oh, you deny it. You didn't do it to promote hate. Nope. Doesn't matter.
Doesn't work that way. I say you did it to promote hate. And that's how it actually works. That sounds insane, but that's where we are in a liberal democracy, in a free world. Now, I want you to really think about this because I know a lot of you guys are like, "Come on, no, you're oversimplifying it." No, I'm really not. What is the nature of a system where not only is truth no defense, but you can't even testify to your own intent?
In fact, a judge who is probably only in power because of his bias against you and everything that you are gets to determine what you had in mind when you made a statement.
Literally, no defense is possible.
What system could possibly be worse? I mean, people talk around these terms like Orwellian, Kafka-esque, whatever.
This is more insane than anything in any of these books. And here's the key.
Everyone who matters, by which I mean not you, but I mean academics and journalists and bureaucrats and media company heads and NGO workers, you know, the people who actually dictate the culture and the norms. These people are all going to say this is actually the essence of democracy. This is how democracy works. This is how you protect democracy with a totally subjective system of whims designed explicitly to protect a false view of the world.
Give me any system of tyranny in the entire world in all of human history.
Nothing that has ever existed was more based on a more absurd premise. Nothing has ever had more unlimited and catastrophic ramifications if taken to its logical conclusions. And you know what? It will be because ideas always get taken to their logical conclusions even if especially if they are completely idiotic.
And it gets worse. We're just getting started. Does this standard apply to white people? Well, can you express hatred against white people? No.
No. You're not even covered by this.
Europeans in Europe are not even protected by this. Why? They're not a protected group. So, you can insult them all you want. Truthfully, lies. It doesn't matter obviously and of course it has to operate that way because if this was the standard that if something you say could be interpreted as inciting hatred against the group, every journalist, every politician, every academic, every bureaucrat on the continent could be thrown in prison cuz what do they do except incite hatred against us? But of course doesn't apply to us. As Dre says, if you said white males are disproportionately committing rape, that is not true. That is a lie, but that's legal. You can say that in Belgium. But if you say non-European migrants are disproportionately committing rape, that is a true statement. You can be upset about it.
You can deny it. You can say, "Well, it's because of blah blah blah blah blah." No, but it's a true statement.
Can't argue with that. But it's still illegal and it's punished by prison.
Why? Dre says this is because our anti-racism law criminalizes any statement that could increase disapproval of a protected group such as asylum seekers or migrants. White males are of course the only non-protected group. So this is beyond anarch tyranny.
It's beyond like, oh, this system is biased. This is just explicitly anti-white and that's the logic of the entire system. this is all that it does.
But let's let's steal man it, right?
Like let's be overly fair.
This Dre guy is far right. I mean, we know what he's really trying to say.
He's a nationalist and that's bad. We actually can assume his intent. It's not like he's an academic or a scholar. He's just putting these ideas out there to whip up hatred and demagoguery. Okay, let's pretend that's true. Let's go with that. Let's consider something else out of Belgium. So, there's this professor named Nathan Kaufnos. until fairly recently he was at Cambridge. There was a controversy there because he noted that without racial preferences, you aren't going to have a lot of black professors at universities. Now, this is true. This is objectively true. In fact, defenders of affirmative action will explicitly say this. What do they say?
We need affirmative action. We need racial preferences or we're not going to have diversity at these institutions.
Nobody disagrees with this. until the Supreme Court in this country got rid of it. The whole justification of affirmative action was that diversity is such a great thing for reasons never really explained that it was a compelling state interest and that necessitated racial discrimination against the majority population. None of this is up for debate, but this professor said at Cambridge, everybody went nuts. Eventually, he left. Now, is this guy, you know, far right in a fascist skirt? No. I think he's Jewish.
The last time he got attention in far-right circles is because he got into a lengthy debate with Dr. Kevin McDonald trying to prove that the latter's thesis was totally wrong. You know, the whole idea of a Jewish evolutionary approach.
He was saying, "No, this is nonsense."
And they went back and forth and everybody was arguing and screaming with each other. He's a critic of right-wing populism. I don't I don't know if he's even on the right at all.
He's certainly not far right, but he has said these obviously true things about race and IQ and all the ramifications of it. So given his background and given everything else, one would reasonably conclude that even if we adopt the insane standard that you can subjectively assume someone's intent when they make an argument that this guy at least is not making this argument for far-right fascist reasons. And I think I'm being overly fair here in steelmanning the legal system. And yet, does the system say, "Well, he's allowed to say this." No, of course not.
Absolutely not. So, there's this guy, Pierre Theier, a justice, a justice on the court of appeals in Antworp, also in Belgium, and he took it upon himself to write an article entitled, "Not an opinion, but a crime, why the discourse of Kafnos is punishable." And in part he says, quote, when he states that genetic variance influencing intelligence may be unevenly distributed across populations and that this can explain differences in cognitive performance, this constitutes not merely a neutral hypothesis, but the empirical basis for a hierarchical view of human nature. The boundaries of article 21 have been manifestly crossed."
Doesn't matter that what he's saying is true.
That is objectively true what he is saying that these natural differences may influence cognitive differences. This is objectively true. There's no real debate about it. And yet you can't say it.
An entire legal system at war with basic reality.
And think about the lie that you are obligated to defend here. And let's be clear here to claim that God Almighty created the world in six days and rested on the seventh. And that the prophet Muhammad split the moon in the sky and nobody else saw it. And that Odin built the world out of a giant's bones. And that the world's on the back of a giant turtle. And that every tall building you've ever seen was created before a mud flood 100 years ago. That white people were created by Yakub. That Hitler's alive in the center of the earth. And that Charlie Kirk was literally shot by Candace [ __ ] Owens herself. To claim that all of that is true at the same time, all of that makes more sense and has a greater basis in objective reality than believing that widely disperate human groups are going to be equal in cognitive performance.
There is no reason to believe that.
There is nothing in the world today to suggest that's true. Every society everywhere with wildly different histories, cultures, governments, economic structures show the same patterns over and over and over again.
And yet you are required in a democracy to believe in this insane egalitarian lie because otherwise you've established an empirical basis for a hierarchical view of human nature. And even if you are not far right, you are not allowed to say that because apparently if you say that truth the entire system just collapses.
Maybe it's worth asking why. I mean this so-called judge also says Belgian case law has made it clear that packaging a discourse as scientific scare quotes philosophical scare quotes or critical scare quotes does not prevent it from being punishable when it objectively incites discrimination or propagates ideas of racial superiority. Now let's unpack that. Think about this. It just gets worse and worse. Now it's not even your intent. It's not enough that they can mindread you. Like what's your real intent for saying you may be right but why did you say that? We can put you in jail. Now it's not even that. Now it's the intent of somebody else with what they do with what you put out there. Now it's how other people might interpret the facts that you lay out and what their intent might be and they can hold you responsible for that.
I mean at that point how can anyone talk about anything? What is even the point of debate or discussion? Because regardless of your own background or intent, how can you possibly risk being responsible for what other people might think, let alone do with objective facts that you've discovered?
Incidentally, by the way, this professor Nathan Koffnos, the committee for academic freedom, committee for academic freedom reported on May 15th that he was assaulted by someone throwing a glass bottle. He got a concussion. They know who did it. No prosecution. Of course not. Of course not. And this is not a far-right guy. This is where we're at.
I mean, look, cut past all the nonsense.
I mean, what what were we talking about here? We're talking about a governmental structure that exists to treat native Europeans essentially as tax cattle for a managerial elite that produces nothing, can produce nothing, and wouldn't produce anything even if it could. But it wants to live at the expense of the productive actual European population. And mass importation of non-Europeans is a good way of ensuring their permanent power.
Why? Because a liberal democracy doesn't really have anything to gain from productive citizens who are patriotic.
That doesn't help people in power.
Because what do you want? You want hostile dependence that you can use to intimidate the actual citizens and uses justification for various programs to redistribute income and manage social relations. That's unlimited government.
That's unlimited power. If you're a corporation, it's also a source of cheap labor. All the externalities get dumped on the taxpayers. If you're a leftist, it's a guaranteed vote bank.
Well, what do we do about it? What's the solution fundamentally? What do you have to do if you don't want to live under a situation of permanent tyranny and permanent exploitation? Remigration.
These people got to go now. This weekend, right now in Portugal, as I said, you have this remigration conference and as part of that, you have the launch of the Institute for Remigration. Martin Selner announced this today and they issued their first press release and it said this, the first European think tank and lobby organization for indigenous Europeans.
And that's something we really need to emphasize. And they say this, a new independent research and policy institution, the Institute for Remigration will officially commence operations following the Remigration Summit in Porto, Portugal on May 30th.
Headquartered in Vienna, the institute aims to become a leading knowledge hub, network, and campaign driver on the issues of demography. the Great Replacement and Remigration. It will be the first think tank and lobby organization in Europe focused on ethnocultural continuity, democrat demographic sovereignty and remigration.
Founder Martin Selner explains, "We regard as a self-evident truth that European peoples exist as an ethnic and cultural reality. They have the right to maintain their identity, integrity by enforcing or changing their migration policy. With the popularization of the term remigration, we have already proved our capacity. The institute will build on this experience and legacy to expand its operations and scale its metapolitical impact. The institute will focus on evidence-based analysis, policy development, and interdisciplinary research on replacement migration. Its core activities include comprehensive data collection and analysis of the great replacement as well as electoral and political analysis of the ethnic vote. Now, let's pause here. Now, these are the kinds of serious studies that apparently you are not allowed to do.
you are not allowed to do even if you are not sympathetic to the arguments of this organization.
These are just things you're not allowed to even look into anymore in a free society. But give these guys credit.
They're going to try to do it anyway.
Managing director Philip Huer states, "We will gather, structure, and analyze scatter data on demographic change, migration, islamization, migrant crime, and electoral behavior." Of course, this is what Dre just got convicted of. Our findings will be published through policy papers, research reports, infographics, digital dashboards, and accessible visual materials. The institute's goal is to become a central European reference point for clear, reliable, and sharable data on demography and migration. To achieve this, the institute will collaborate with academic professionals, think tanks, policy makers, journalists, international partners. Its goal is to foster serious debate and promote sustainable progressives remigration strategies. Now, here's the problem. Are you even allowed to do this? Because again, as we've learned, you are not allowed to even talk about this as a university. It doesn't matter if you stick to the facts. It doesn't matter if you stick to the data. It doesn't matter if you stick to the evidence. Are you even allowed to gather the data? I mean, keep in mind, both in Europe and America, you've seen attempts by journalists, no less, to make sure that ordinary citizens cannot access this data because they don't want you to know the impact of these policies.
But then again, what can you do? There's no way out but through. You have to go through this.
The Institute says among its flagship projects, the Institute for Remigration, it's a great name, will present a European Remigration Pact by the end of the year. This document will bring together some of the most developed and innovative remigration policy proposals from across Europe. It also aims to monitor whether right-wing parties, and I'm glad they say explicitly right-wing and governments follow through on their migration and remigration commitments.
Looking at you, George Maloney. Publish regular ratings and rankings of politicians and parties based on their stated policies and actual performance and encourage political consistency by rewarding clear commitments and identifying cases of policy softening after elections. Again, Maloney. So, this is very much within the mainstream like this is happening. This is the way the system is supposed to work. Look at the parties that have been gathering support. Look at the parties that have been winning. Look at the parties that are taking over some cities. Look at the popularity of the term remigration. Like this is the way people are supposed to govern themselves, right? This is what we're told. So what happens in Europe?
Just before the conference today, German identitarian leader Maxmillian Markle gets prevented from leaving his own country. Now, here's why this matters.
The whole point of the European Union is you're supposed to have freedom of movement. That's the whole reason it exists. There's no more borders. You can go wherever you want. All these things are outdated. Oh, we're not we're not petty nationalists. No, we're above that. We're cosmopolitans. You can go anywhere. But not you.
Oh, you're an EU citizen. No. Oh, the Shenhen agreement and all these things that we've signed and all these human rights that we talk about, no, they don't apply to you. You're just a filthy European. You don't get anything. Why?
Because you're going to participate in a conference. And that's not allowed. Is this hyperbole? No. They spelled it out.
Markle posted on X. He said, "I was just arrested at Munich airport and prevented from leaving the country. My fundamental right to freedom of movement has been violated because I allegedly threaten the reputation of the Federal Republic of Germany."
Again, guys, every single society has blasphemy laws. Doesn't matter what the structure of government is. Doesn't matter whether they say they have a religion or not. Every society has blasphemy laws. And you would think that like aping East Germany and building like a new Berlin wall where these people can't leave. You would think that would threaten the reputation of the Federal Republic of Germany more, but apparently not. And he continues, "Right before the remigration summit, they're panicking. They've already lost every single debate and the culture war. Every European can see the devastating consequences of the population replacement with his own eyes. So they're playing their final card, raw repression. And this is where we need to really start thinking about this. This is where they are going. And here's the problem. It doesn't matter how flawed a system is. It doesn't matter how catastrophic the consequences are. You think these people don't know? You think they don't know what they're unleashing?
You think they don't like look at their own cities and how some of the greatest cities in the world have just become third world slums in the course of a decade? You think they don't like it?
You think that's not the reason they're doing it? You think they don't get off on the idea of punishing people? I mean, they explicitly say this is why they're not letting him come to this conference.
According to Europa.com, the official order banning Marl's departure justified the ban by claiming his attendance of the conference could lead to a growth of European identitarianism.
Apparently, that's a banned idea. Now, this is what they said. With this, you demonstrabably participate actively in the abovementioned event, thereby strengthening the transnational networking of the identitarian movement in Europe and dissemination of the identitarian interpretation of the term remigration. We have banned words now.
This is where we're at. You're just not allowed to do this.
Well, you know, it's temporary.
Nationalists are winning across the EU.
The EU might get its policies changed.
Okay, what's the EU gonna do? So, the European Union has this watchdog. Right now, again, anytime you see any of these human rights and democracy protecting groups, these people only show up when it's time to shut you up. Like, they're never there to defend your rights. You ever noticed this? It's never defend your right to free speech, your right to self-defense, your right to freedom of association, your right to your own property. No, though, you don't have those human rights. you just have like the human rights of Somalians to like rape you and steal all your money. Like those are the only rights that actually exist apparently. And they're screaming today, this watchdog of the European Union, they're screaming that they need to ban the Europe of Sovereign Nations party. Now what's this? The European Union, the way it works, obviously you've got all these groups from different countries that can kind of band together and form like a party in the European Parliament. And you kind of need this because you need to operate as a block in order to get a certain amount of funding and in order to operate effectively. So you got this Europe of Sovereign Nations Party. Probably the best known member is the Alternative for Germany Party, which may end up running the former East Germany very soon. But now they're going to get banned. Why?
Because they're failing to uphold EU values. Okay. Well, what are these EU values? Is it freedom of speech? Is it freedom of association? Is it being able to run your own property? Is it being able to talk about what you want? Is it liberal democracy? is even just like very innocent things like oh the individual is sovereign or something like that. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. They are very explicit. Politico says the watchdog monitors whether political parties and foundations comply with the EU rules that govern them.
Those rules require parties to uphold the union's core values, including respect for human dignity, freedom.
Yeah, we see how that's interpreted.
Democracy, equality, the rule of law, we see how that's interpreted. and human rights, including the rights of minorities, as enshrined in article 2 of the treaty on European Union. In his 300page letter, Schronard says there is evidence that ESN members are violating EU values. The proof includes court rulings and screenshots and social media posts from members of European Parliament and party lawmakers that display anti-immigration, anti-semitic, and anti-LGBT rhetoric, including calls for remigration.
So you are not allowed to say Europe for Europeans according to the European Union. Meanwhile, the left party in Germany is already advancing legislation to sh to say that foreigners should be able to vote.
So foreigners will get rights. You do not get rights. This is fine. This is how it works. the Spanish government.
The same one where the leading government officials just got raided earlier this week for corruption. The same one that's a minority coalition of separatist parties and then some socialists. So, a minority government of traitors. The same one that couldn't get its immigration policy through parliament. So, they somehow use the monarchy that they opposed to put it through. This government that legalized more than half a million non-whites who were illegally in the country, all of whom now have total freedom to move through the European Union. That's fine.
And all those guys can go anywhere in the shenen zone. But if you're a European Union who don't want these people there, doesn't apply to you.
That's fine. That's democracy. All the rights, the values, the fundamental freedoms, it's so wonderful. No, no, no, no, no, no. You get thrown in jail because state media doesn't like a meme you posted in a private chat. A judge doesn't like the intent behind a factual argument you made. An intent he made up, by the way, in his own imagination.
That's fine, too. That's the rule of law. There's no defense possible, but why should you be allowed to have a defense? The law is entirely subjective.
You're an actual European. The law doesn't help you. You don't get protection from it. It's for your replacements. That's democracy at work.
That's freedom. That's what we need to defend. This is where we're at. Ask yourself this. If the purpose of a system is what it does, what is the purpose of the European Union except to extrepate Europeans?
You tell me.
And yes, before somebody says it, I'm familiar with, "Oh, actually, it's the Americans." Okay, yes, I I get it. I've read Yaki, too. Fine. But it's not 1946.
These are EU officials and officials and national governments pushing this. And by the way, the United States, maybe not as actively as we would like, but the USA is actually pushing at least a little bit against this in reference to the case of Dree under Secretary of State Sarah Rogers posted. Policymakers worried about the rise of the so-called farright, so-called farright, that's promising, should avoid criminalizing accurate, data-driven political speech about mass migration, as this ruling appears to explicitly contemplate. Doing so means that people willing to get convicted of racism in scare quotes get a monopoly on making arguments that strike large segments of the public as important and true. Okay. Yeah. Look, granted bit cringe defensive framing. I get that. But what are they trying to do here? They're trying to argue from the perspective of if you're trying to appeal to somebody in the EU, somebody on the center right say, what is an argument they might actually listen to?
So I give the US government something some credit for this. I mean, it's more than I've ever seen in my lifetime before, but it's not enough. And we all know it's not enough. And if we had a real movement in this country, this would be the time for protests at the Belgian embassy and writing the State Department in the White House and doing everything we can to put pressure on the EU. And maybe we can do that. Maybe that's a discussion we can have. But the bigger question we have to confront is this. At least in Europe, there is a real movement developing. The proof of it will be this weekend at this conference. And again, pay attention to the news. You're going to see some big news at that conference. I promise you.
There is now a real consensus that remigration is the way forward. The political parties are rising. The institutions are being built. The crossber alliances are being built. The popular support is there. The mass base is there. But the EU is making it literally impossible not just to push through these policies if you get elected nationally, but to even discuss it. Why? It's just spite. It's just spite and lust for power. No one thinks mass migrations of Zubnans into Europe is going to make things better. Maybe 20 years ago, some people thought that.
Maybe even 10 years ago. Nobody thinks this now. Nobody. Nobody thinks this is going to work out. Nobody thinks this is going to do anything but make Europe worse. But at this point, the repression justifies itself. It's this kind of insane rage against patriotic Europeans and the satisfaction those in power take in hurting them because they can. It's an end in itself and we should be under no illusions about how far the system is going to be willing to go. Harbor no expectations that they will ever learn their lesson or reverse course. The repression will get worse and Americans need to be ready to support Europeans who are going to be going through this.
More importantly, perhaps on this side of the ocean, we should understand this is absolutely coming here if circumstances change. The Constitution's not going to do anything. They will redefine that overnight. That's not going to do a thing. Every journalist, every academic, every NGO staffer is drooling right now looking at Brussels because they're saying this is what democracy looks like. And there is no irony when they say that.
There is no way out. But through for any of us and there is no scenario where Europe wins and America loses or vice versa. It's going to be all or none.
The way out is remigration. The way we get there is European solidarity.
Pay attention to what's happening this weekend. This is going to move into an entirely new phase really soon. You guys better be ready.
That's all I have to say.
Yeah, man.
Getting angrier and angrier. Thinking the more I think about it, the angrier I get.
Jackson Dobson, $20 super chat. Thank you, man. Brilliant description of what amounts to the ultimate friend enemy who distinction. The crime is your mere existence. Yeah. And your ability to speak at all. There's no political solution in that world. Well, like I always say, there may not be an electoral solution, but there is any solution is going to be a political solution because any solution that involves power is a political solution.
But it's an interesting question. I mean, people say like, well, you know, elections are, you know, why participate in the political system? It's like, think of it this way. Did people vote their way out in the American Revolution? I mean, the short answer you, well, no, of course not. It's like kind of. I mean, if you look at like who staffed the colonial legislators, who sent the delegates to all the various conventions, I mean, those people were elected. You look at the Civil War when they voted for secession, who did that?
That was the state legislators. Those were elected representatives. They they voted. They That's how it happened. If you want to talk about the English Civil War, you know, why did Parliament do these things? It's like, well, they didn't just show up there one day. I mean, they were elected by somebody.
Granted, it was a pretty restricted franchise, but like they were elected.
So even if it's like, well, we're not going to just vote our way out. Voting is going to play a part. The existing institutions are going to play a part just as they did in say the collapse of the Soviet Union. I mean, they don't just like wither away magically like they do stuff on the way out because they have a certain amount of institutional power. And I don't think we should seed any of that if we have a realistic chance of getting any of it. I mean, again, I just went on a whole thing about how the European Union is basically making it illegal to do these kinds of things. But if you get a victory in a European election or in a national election, is that going to have consequences? Yeah, if only because that allows you to force the confrontation.
You need some kind of a base to force that confrontation.
Thank you for the super chat, man. Much appreciated.
Yeah, I got you.
It's on Naka one $1. Thank you. More questions about your paganism. Are there certain deities you favor? Norse, Roman, etc. What is religious practice look like your house? Would you accept your children becoming Christian? Well, I'd say dramatic. I mean, I think I'm pretty clear on that. It's more of a uh communal thing and with the group that I'm in. So, you know, there's there may be things I do at my house, but it's more the things we do as a group. And as far as my kids are concerned, they're four in one. So, it's not something uh at least in this household, it's not something I've really thought about yet, but I mean, they're going to be brought up in this. That's a discussion that I guess they'll have when uh when they're teenagers. I mean, it's always like a thing like when kids rebel. And this is a larger question in terms of people, especially people on the far right, so to speak. You want to give your kids your values, but you don't want to just like push it on them to the point where they're obviously going to rebel against you. I don't think I need to name farright activists who tried to basically indoctrinate their own kids into being part of the movement. And then of course it turns out to be a total catastrophe. So obviously maybe there's no perfect solution to that, but they're going to be brought up in this, but I'm going to do it subtly and not and not try to force an identity on them. And I think they'll make the right choice.
Let's see. Arcane Deps, $3. Thank you.
Thank you, Arcane Deps. Much appreciated. Cath, great show as always.
Thank you. $5. Arcane Depps with the $1 donations. Thank you so much, man. Dirt Gang, Arizona, $20. Keep fighting the good fight. We will have our home again.
WP Romans up. Hell yeah. Arcane Deps $1.
I love these $1 donation.
Thank you, Dirt G. Dirt Gang Arizona.
Much appreciated, guys. Randall Flag, $2. Black and brown students are suing the city school district here, claiming the usual racism. Public schools spend $30,000 a year on children of Haitians and Somali. send them to the liberal white suburbs or send them back to Haiti and Somalia. But yeah, Randall Flag, another $2. Thank you for America's 250th birthday. I'm sure the founding fathers will be ecstatic with all the delicious Indian food available to them and the incredible GDP growth, exactly how they envisioned the USA. I mean, yeah, why do we need the 1790 immigration act when we have like Indian slop that puts you on the toilet for three days? That's what America's all about.
and like healthy hyperborian cuisine like white monsters. George Washington knew it all about this [ __ ] And incidentally, as far as alcohol goes, I've developed a taste for um my fellow William and Mary alum Thomas Jefferson's uh favorite drink, which was Madiraa. That stuff's great. Portuguese drink, by the way, because got to express solidarity with Portugal this weekend. Randle flag $2. It's widely predicted the UK will be the flash point for the first world uprising against government policies in Europe, I completely agree. If I if I had to pick one country where I mean I think you're going to see victories in other countries first. If I had to pick one country where you're going to see a government elected, a party elected, maybe not with a majority, but at least with a plurality, where they say remigration is part of our platform, I'd probably say Austria, which not coincidentally is where Martin is. and where this institute is going to be based. I don't think that's an accident, but so I would say Austria. But as far as where things may get a little crazy, the UK, I mean, it's going to look like Northern Ireland. And I think people like like to talk about like, oh, it's going to be this crazy situation. It's going to be like a zombie movie. It's going to be like even Lebanon or something like that. I think it's going to be more like the troubles. It's going to be this sort of the political system will kind of stumble on. The rules will still be there. There'll still be like the law.
There'll still be the police. It's not going to be anarchy, but you're just going to see these sort of explosions of communal violence. And then the state will come down on one side or the other.
And you'll see it also expressed in the political system, which is why we got to look very closely at what happens with reform and more importantly restore.
>> All right.
Super chat.
Appreciate the super chats, guys.
Renunciate. Give one subscription to Identity Politics. Thank you.
Two subscriptions. Thank you. Much appreciated. Renunciate.
Of any problem. $10. Thank you, sir.
Since we are on Belgium again, I must say some things. Fries are French and ketchup is better than mayo. Oh god, the mayo question has intervened again. This is what we're talking about now. Forget remigration. We're talking about mayonnaise on fries. I mean this if you're talking about Belgium, this is like the critical question.
Brussels mannequin please is older than Kergens.
Brussels mannequin. Oh, I see. He's talking about beers. Okay.
I mean, I'm I'm going on the uh mayo on fries, man. Maybe maybe I'm not white.
This is the this is the question for the chat.
Is it whiter to support ketchup on fries or mayonnaise on fries? or bonus question, the uh the vinegar.
Big red dragon 123. Always a pleasure to see you here, man. Thank you so much.
$5. Much appreciated. What kinds of sentences are the European states handing out for these things? It's still in that five years or less range. Yeah, it is in that five years or less. I think Dres is looking at one year for the previous one. I'm not sure they sentenced him for this other one yet.
Forcing the issue by boldly continuing may still be the right move. Well, yeah.
I mean, you kind of that's sort of what what we have to do and that's what we're going to have to do when they come up with something here. I mean, I think here they're going to be more subtle and more crafty and less direct. What I think if I was trying to outlaw hate speech in the United States of America, I wouldn't try to go directly through the First Amendment, at least not right away. What I would do is I would say, well, you're allowed to do civil penalties for creating a climate of hate or something like that. So you give a speech where you talk about, you know, the obvious thing, racial differences and IQ, and you say, well, you hurt the feelings of all these people and this caused emotional harm and therefore they can't succeed as much as they want and they got these things of depression and you can come up with all sorts of social research where people will use to justify that. Therefore, you owe infinity billion dollars. I mean, that's the kind of way that I think they would go about doing it. In Europe, they're doing it much more direct, which I think actually works to the advantage because somebody goes to jail for a year, I mean, that's a martyr and that's also an issue because if you get these nationalist parties getting elected, they can campaign for clemency and things like that. I mean, one of the things that I've kind of referred to in the past is when you think of movements that were outside the system, let's talk about like the anarchists or the revolutionary socialists at the turn of the century, they would still have people in the parliaments who may have been explicit supporters or maybe not so much, maybe just sympathizers, but they would be arguing for clemency or amnesty after they did something. And I think that's a kind of model that we'll probably see more of in the years ahead on our side.
All right, $50 super chat. Thank you so much. Much appreciated.
Unreonstructed yman. Really appreciate coming through with the big super chat.
When revolution and session by violence are on the ballot, let me know.
Otherwise, it's just hot air. I admire your zeal and intellect and I respect all the work you've put in over the years. Thank you so much. Well, we'll uh I think it's going to be it's never on the ballot until it is.
It's it's it's going to be a crisis that the system will not be able to cope with and the regular political system will lead to that crisis.
I guess that would be my position as far as how I think this is going to play out. And if you say, well, what are some situations like that? I mean, basically every revolutionary situation in this country has faced. I mean, it always is preceded or frankly that Europe has faced. I mean things go through the existing system until the existing system can no longer cope with the problem and then that's how you end up with a revolutionary situation. And also I mean think of what will happen if let's say you get a party elected in a European government let's say Austria just for the sake of argument where you actually get remigration and they say okay we're going to do it and they don't do like oh just the illegals but they actually start doing a remigration policy and then you start getting violent resistance from leftists much like the we saw in Minneapolis but maybe a step up then what happens or the European Union says you're not allowed to do this then what happens happens, especially if you see other countries saying, "No, no, no. We're committed to remigration," or, "We at least think that other countries should be allowed to decide their own fate." This is where these institutions start to move in unexpected directions.
We'll see how it plays out, but I do think it's coming.
Arcane Deps $10. Mayo always mail forever. These are the important questions, man.
I got you.
USUR patient. Why you be so racist? Very good question.
[ __ ] Arcade devs. I love the mail forever.
John Grady Cole $1. Solidarity is the most important word in organizing groups and further movement. I agree. This is a must. I could use some book recommendations for my teenage sons. All right.
Well, I mean, in terms of ideology or in terms of tactics, I mean, for tactics, and I'm talking like beginner books, right? For tactics, I would go with dedication and leadership by Douglas Hyde. Uh, that's a good place to start as far as how one gets involved in any kind of a political movement. I did an audio episode for subscribers on the Kofi about that. And as far as race, if you were said, well, how why should a people care about this kind of thing? I would say and again because teenagers don't read as much as people do. They they mostly go with video and everything else. So you want books that are kind of short. Dedication and leadership is pretty short. I would say Essential Writings on Race by Sam Francis. Very short. It's very pathy. Best writer this movement's ever produced. The essential arguments are all right there. And it's like this is why you should care. This is why it matters. So those two, I mean, if I had to give somebody two books as far as politics generally, as far as like my overall approach to politics, I mean, that one's easy. The Mchavelians by James Burnham. If I had one book that I had to give people to understand politics, I would say that one.
And also the good thing about that book is it's a review of a whole school of thinkers. So you you read it and then you get interested in it and you might look into more thinkers. Shang go unchanged $2. Always a pleasure to see you, man. In Utah, we have something called fry sauce, which is a mix of mix of ketchup and mayo. See, the Mormons coming through with the hyperboran synthesis. I personally don't agree with condiment misogynation, though. Patriot oppose condiment misogynation.
>> Not even once.
Once you go condiment misogynation, you're lost to us. No decent white man will want those French fries.
Jackson Dobson said dead dollars. The UK seems to be removing the right to jury trial. Yes, they are. And trimming civil liberties in anticipation of its upcoming troubles. I agree. I absolutely agree. And when did they start doing that? After the recent unpleasantness.
Most of the continent doesn't have these rights in the way. Yeah. I mean, this is the legalism of the Anglosphere does more harm than good for us at this point, but it is revealing that even that is too much for the current UK government. I mean, I think that's that system really is on the the breaking point. And people always love to talk about like, oh, the British Constitution, the mixed constitution, the unwritten British Constitution. I mean, that constitution is gone. I mean, it used to have all these like privileges and these these ideas and and precedents that went back centuries.
They have a Supreme Court now, which is only a couple decades old, but it gets to interpret everything just like ours.
Operates the exact same way. The monarchy, of course, has basically been rendered totally powerless. May as well not even exist. The House of Lords has basically become all labor now because you can just appoint peers. So the old nobility has been completely stripped of power. Even the symbolic power that they had in the House of Lords, they can't even speak out on this stuff anymore.
So I mean essentially it's the political class in terms of the permanent government bureaucracy, the House of Commons, and that's it. And and and of course like all these various Europe extra governmental bodies like the NOS's that get all the public funding and the these treaties that they've signed, you know, you always see this when it comes to immigration policy. Oh, we can't stop the boats. Why? Because there's this European human rights treaty. Well, why don't you just repeal it? Oh, well, we can't do that. I mean, even Nigel Farage is tying himself a knots over this kind of thing.
But it is, I think you hit on a very important point that they're they're having to get rid of these things, these remnants of the older regime, even though those remnants are just in powerless, but even that is still too much for them.
Vain 11 $2. Thank you so much. I think you are fundamentally and ultimately correct in your real world approach to solving the problems that face us. Thank you. I hope so.
See, yeah, I'm trying to find the other one.
See, >> is it I'm not seeing it. Oh, there it is. However, I think there is anxiety among most on our side because you're right. because everybody knows deep down just how radical, difficult, and painful the real politic route will have to be.
Yeah, I uh I think about that a lot. It would be easier if I was just trying to be entertaining or get clicks to just say, "Look, we just do this one thing.
We do this one thing, this all or nothing approach, and you just kind of hammer away at it day in and day out, and someday eventually in the future, we just win. And we get to win everything.
and we get to win all at once and you don't actually have to do anything.
Unfortunately, I don't think that's the way the world works. Martin Selmer, by the way, has a couple new books out. I'm going to try to have him on the show as soon as possible to re talk about his new book, Remigration, but he's also got a book on political strategy, which I need to pick up. But Jared talked to me about it a little bit today, and he pointed out it's a very sophisticated book. And again, it's may not be what a lot of people want to hear because he basically says, "Look, there's a lot of different things that you have to do at once." And this is one of the weird things about movements. And this is something just generally speaking because we're all we all have our own things, right? We all have people we like and don't like, and there all these divisions. And anybody who's been in the far right knows that it is a it is a fractious group. But here's the thing to remember.
any successful movement is going to be pursuing goals that are not just different but also contradictory in some ways. Like in a weird way, you actually need the people who are saying you need to oppose any involvement with the system and you need the people saying we need to get elected and take over the system and you need the people saying we need to be doing parallel structures and you need that happening all at once.
Like the best you can hope for is that the leaders of these movements and hopefully the members too aren't at each other's throats and trying to like sabotage each other and everybody's just kind of doing their own thing. Let a thousand flowers bloom, that type of thing. And there are many reasons for that, but one of the most important reasons is that we don't actually know what's going to happen. And if you want a total change, you know, a revolutionary situation as people always talk about, you don't get that unless the people in charge, who have to basically be your existential enemies and identify publicly as such. Unless those guys are in charge and unless they screw something up really bad. And I don't mean a recession. I don't mean like, oh, the Iran war made gas prices go up. I mean like starting a real war carrier goes down all hands on deck and the whole world sees it and the entire regime is discredited and the currency collapses type thing. I mean think of how many years World War I raged on before the zar collapsed. It's a pretty long time and pretty catastrophic the way they waged it at the beginning and they still were able to hang on for a long time. And there's no guarantee that any government is going to make those kinds of mistakes. So given that you want to have as many different approaches as possible and I think it's a mistake to say that only this approach will work because to say that you would basically need to predict the future.
Not just predict the future but predict with perfect accuracy the behavior of your political opponents which nobody can do.
OC9398 $2. Thank you so much Kevin. Have you read Boyd's Wright's book? I know no if know your opinion of it. I have not read it. I have heard of it. I familiar I am familiar with the work of Boyd Rice but I have not read that book but I'll make you a promise. I'll read it.
A lot of people actually have been talking to me about Boyd Rice. So I'll check it out.
Listen to some of his stuff though.
Think we got through all the super chats right? All right, thank you for all the super chats, guys. Much appreciated. I mean, again, like the we're very dependent on help from everybody else. I mean, the more we can get, the more content we can do, and then hopefully it'll become a positive reinforcement type cycle. So, anything you guys can do, really appreciate it. I'm really happy that the Ajab thing is becoming uh sort of our If we get the AAB shirts out, would you guys want them? I think I've worn it before on here. The one I think it was the first live chat, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. I I got to uh Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, I'll see if if people want the Ajab shirts, I'll get more of those made and basically let them go at cost more or less. Cheap as I can do it. I just want the meme to get out there.
All right, let's see where we're at. I'm kind of like halfway at the end here, so we'll just go through them here. Oh, another one.
USRU Patriot $5. Thank you so much. I have visited Eastern European mega cities taking trains, buses, and the subway. Literally all white people. I have too. I noticed that in Budapest. I remember being in a mall. No fat people, no pajamas, no blue hair. The USA is very ugly. At the risk of being unpatriotic.
That was what I thought when I was in Budapest, too. I was I was on mass transit and I was looking around. I was like, "Oh, this this is what it's like.
You can you can do this." And I was in a couple other Eastern European countries where diversity hadn't hit yet. And I remember looking around and being like, "Oh, this is what a city's supposed to be like. I get it now." Like, "Oh, there's not just like weird criminals like screaming at everyone. There's not like Africans trying to destroy everything. There's not Indians trying to sell you like stupid crap you don't need. Like this is this is how white people are supposed to live. Oh, okay. I get it. Like this is what it's supposed to look like." And then you come home and you're like there there's no reason for any of this. Like none of these people need to be here. Like every single one of them could go tomorrow.
It's just it'd be so easy. It's just we I have a morality that says you're not allowed to do it. Well, your morality is stupid and we shouldn't listen to it anymore.
Arcane dabs $10. Me want shirt. See, I admire the directness of that. Me want shirt. Well, I'll make sure that's enough for me. I'll make sure we get the shirt.
There should do patches, too.
I don't know if a job patches might be too esoteric for people. Of course, double meaning.
>> Oh yeah, that's right.
Maybe we can only do it a call. Or maybe we could offer it as like uh you can send people stuff for various reasons.
>> Yeah. Right, right, right. We'll do it like that.
>> Ricky192. What shirt? There were these shirt There was a shirt I wore I think.
Was it the one when Charlie Kirk got shot? Yeah. Yeah, it was. I had a shirt that a friend of mine made for me called that has the uh all journalists are bastards thing that I came up with and it's got the design and everything else.
So all journals are bastards I think that one said and some people like that.
Maybe I'll wear it next time and uh if people want it I'll get more made. We'll figure out a way to get it to you guys.
Really stupid and Jewish. Thank you Coney Hawk Pro Slaver.
I love these kinds of uh commentary.
Vain 11 $2. Thank you so much. Can you elaborate further on identifying first as a white man, then as an American? I feel my loyalty must be with my immediate racial family first and those are Americans, then I can begin.
Yeah, I mean this is this is a good question. All right. I think because this is sort of an overall strategic question.
I'll say this in terms of the the race first approach and if people want to if people want to be slightly more cucked about it you could be like oh cultural or whatever. I mean for me it's about race but I work for American Renaissance so you anticipate that I have more in common even if I don't speak the language with a white European than I do with a black American.
Obviously culturally, maybe especially with pop culture, maybe in terms of shorthand references, this sort of thing.
Yeah, obviously in some ways I'll be able to communicate more effectively with a black American. But in terms of the way I view the world, in terms of the fundamentals, I have found that not to be true. And I think that many of our more existential, I don't want to say enemies, but let's say political opponents, people who have inherently different interests to us, and there's no way to get around that. doesn't mean we have to like fight them to the death or something, but the idea that we don't really have a common interest. They're basically non-whites in this country, especially when most of my politics is get these people out of the country. So that's why I say race first and not civic identity. But I will say this, fundamentally, we are here and we are in this system and the most we good that we can do is doing the most we can where we are. like we can't be just totally drastinated and say I am going to preach this universal white identity and remain aloof from all political struggles in my own country. It's like well the problem is it doesn't really work that way. I mean I I hate to make this comparison. I was kind of talking around it but I guess I have to think of the way the communists operated.
In theory, you don't have any loyalty to your home country because your country is a bourgeoa construct and the working man has no country and it should be internationalist and blah blah blah blah blah. In practice, what do you do?
You're forming trade unions and parties and you're trying to do the most good that you can within your own country and eventually you're trying to take over your own government. That doesn't mean you don't have internationalism. That doesn't mean you don't support the struggles in other places. But fundamentally you got to start where you are. And so that means where do we have to be most concerned with America? And there's another complicated factor. If you are American like this I I hate the the kind of American chauvinism where it's like oh Europe is bad and whatever else and you see this on a lot of people just as much as I hate the Europeans talking about us in that way. But this is this is just a geopolitical reality.
This is the empire. This is the superpower. what happens in America has a much bigger impact on the rest of the world than what happens in say one European country. Now, if the EU as a whole started operating in one way, yeah, that would be a comparable impact to America, maybe even bigger, but that's not what we're in right now. So, we actually have a responsibility to try to steer America in a direction that is positive, not just for our own sake, but for everybody else's sake.
I mean, it's sort of like these one of the reasons I've been critical of people who, you know, these these Christian churches where they say like, "Oh, we're going to send a mission to the third world." It's like, if you actually believed in what you were saying, you'd be concerned about retaking America for your religion because that's everything's going to flow downstream from that. I mean, if you were like, "Oh, well, we converted 20 people in Haiti." It's like, "Okay, but then they're going to watch American TV and then they're going to go right back to whatever else." like the metropole is what matters most and America is the metropole.
Bane 11. Yeah, I never quite grasped what you meant, but when you say that the left invites immigrants because they harm the country and that the left would fortify the border the next day if they were net positive. Well, there are two reasons. I mean, there's more than just two, but just two that come to mind very briefly. One is that a lot of the people who are advocating for mass immigration in their own words like again you don't have to listen to me listen to them they say we are doing these things because we want to deconstruct the country it is bad for the country that's why we are doing it but part of it is deliberately destructive but there's also just an incentive system which is that these people are clients and they're reliable clients and they're a power base and if you bring in I mean look at these white South Africans who are being brought in.
They're not going to go on welfare.
They're not going to automatically be signed up to support a leftwing political party. Therefore, they're of no use to these things. And that's why countermeasures $100.
Counter measures, you are a hero of the folk. Thank you.
Much appreciated, ma'am. Donations of that size make a huge difference. Thank you so much.
Salute General. Supposing we had a rich benefactor for this thing of ours. Would creating a casa pound here in the states to organize something on the ground be more helpful or hurt in your opinion?
Well, we don't need a rich benefactor to do that. I mean, I like to think that sure, a rich benefactor would be good.
And you know, before everybody says anything, I know there was this uh there was the video that Keith Woods put out or somebody put out of Keith Woods talking where it was like, well, if you had like a rich benefactor, what would you say? It was like a thought experiment that I think Greg Johnson asked people to speak and Jared gave his answer and Keith gave his answer and I gave an answer too but I mean that was more of a thought experiment more like if this occurred what would you do truth be told don't tell anybody else but I mean I came up with my thing like on the spot right then and there still hope it gets released because I believe in what I said but with something like a pound and I think that is like the most important thing that we could do in terms of somebody says what is something we could do right now based on where I am. It's not a question of ape and cost a pound because there you're dealing with a very specific culture and very specific circumstances that don't necessarily translate over well to America. For example, we don't really have a tradition of say squatting in buildings in American cities. So, if I had 20, let's say I was 23 again and I had 20 activists with me in New York City or something, would I say we should go in this building, we should squat in it, we should take it over. Probably not. That might not work the same way for us. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't. But what I would say, and this is something one of the Kasa pound guys said to me, and I think this is kind of a challenge. Why is it that there are no nationalist pubs, no nationalist restaurants, no nationalist bookstores?
Why do none of these institutions exist in the United States? I mean, I don't think he meant it as an insult, but made me feel pretty shitty. I mean, that's a very good question. We don't have these kinds of things. The one thing that we do have, of course, are all these active clubs that are spring up. We do have gyms. We do have MMA schools and things like that, but I mean, that's a pretty niche thing limited to one type of person. We need other things, too. So, I do think it is one of the most important things that we could be doing. Kasa Poundound, I think, is one of the most inspirational examples out there. I certainly am trying to build more of those types of things. And if you know anything about me in terms of who I'm involved with, I like to think I'm involved in things that are akin to that.
USRU Patriot Kevin, be honest. When did your addiction to Monster Energy drink begin? O well, there are two questions there. One is the addiction to Monster Energy Drink. That was probably a long time ago. That was probably like 10 years ago. But the question of went to the white monster because I got to confess something to you guys. Don't hate me. But my original thing was the rehabs. The monster rehabs. That was how I began every day. I'd have uh I'd have one monster rehab first thing in the morning. I'd have another one on the drive to work. It's like that Sam Hyde skit where he taking all the caffeine and taking the nasin and stuff. That was like how I began every day when I worked at the office. But the white ones was probably about three. I mean, it was defin It was one of those ones where I didn't have the flavor I liked and there was only a white one and I was like, "All right, fine." So, I take that and you have some of it and I'm like, I don't like this as much as the other one. And then you get down to about there and it's like, I can see through time and I understand the mysteries of hyperoreia. And then that was all that happened. That was all they wrote.
Rehabs with a lady having cooked.
I switched over to this now.
Big Red Dragon123 $5. Do our guys have enough density in urban centers to pull off brick and mortar stores in America?
Well, I'll come back to that. The people always seem widely physically spread out to me. Hired to commute 90 minutes for a pub. Well, this is one of the big things. This is one of the fundamental differences and circumstances between the American and European situations.
You do not have I mean, what what do white Americans do generally when you have diversity in these sorts of situations? you move away. I mean, that's what the suburban the suburbs were basically created to do. I mean, if you look at, you want to look at other institutions that used to exist, maybe are not the most right-wing explicitly, but you look at like men's clubs, gentleman's clubs, things like the Union Club in New York City and things like that. Uh, I just I mentioned that just because there was like a right-wing gathering at that maybe 5 years ago or something that they booked.
These are things that basically anybody who mattered used to be members in. and they would have, you know, a place you could stay and there would be always be a bar there and they'd have, you know, it's like the Yale club or something like that. These sorts of things are just not like people don't do that anymore. If somebody was like, "Oh, I'm going to be at this thing." You would kind of look at them like, "What are you talking about?" Like nobody nobody does that anymore. And it's because the way people work is different. The the social norms for how men are supposed to act after work are totally different. The idea of something that's like totally gender segregated is also different.
Now, I mean, in Britain, they had these sorts of things, and they were basically shut down, and there are all these like legal efforts still trying to get rid of them, but fundamentally, the Europeans are still in the cities. They they can't like run away. For one thing, the countries just aren't that big, and you just have to deal with this stuff, and you just have a different kind of bar culture. I mean, one of the big things that I noticed every time I'm over there is when you go to a European pub or bar or whatever, a lot of times you don't have a TV. And that by itself makes a huge difference because everybody's talking to each other, they're singing songs or they're getting involved in whatever. I mean, you go to a bar in America, what do you do? You basically just stare. It's not just one TV.
Usually, it's like 20 TVs and you just like stare at that and disappear in your drink and maybe you talk to one other guy usually about like what's going on on the TV. It's just a different kind of culture. So that said, there are attempts right now to do some of these real world brick-andmortar things. I mean, I certainly want to do a lot of these things. I'm obviously not going to talk about it too much on here because I don't want to like blow up their [ __ ] but people are trying to do this kind of thing now, and I expect you'll hear more about these sorts of things. And certainly I but I don't think it will necessarily be in maybe New York, LA, Chicago, things like that. But I expected it's going to be in a lot of cities that are a little bit out of the way.
Kevin, are you willing to collab with the projects brothers? Those dudes are leading the cause against the we'll have to check it out. I'll look into it.
Yeah, I see it. Van 11. I just want to uh I'll I'll look into the projects brothers and what's going the Wii was van 11. I think we can get some to leave voluntarily, but I think the majority of foreigners here, especially the legal ones, will require some form of physical confrontation, even all at war. There are different ways of doing this. I mean, some have suggested sort of the salami strategy where you basically there are lots of people we could get out right away immediately and the laws are already there. It's just a question of will. Obviously, the comparison here is illegal immigrants in the United States. And yeah, you got to deal with the courts and yeah, you got to deal with the Democrats and you got to deal with all this stuff. But if the will's there, there are so many things we could do tomorrow. I mean, why are people talking about Greg Benino right now? Because he's basically saying, "Hey, we we could be doing these things.
We could be doing more of these things."
And I think Europe, it's going to be the same way. I mean, you start off with most of the unsympathetic cases. That reduces the mass base for resistance, so to speak. And also you break the will of the opposition if they because they're going to go to the mat for even the most unsympathetic cases. And if you can get those unsympathetic cases are and you can break get those unsympathetic cases out and break their will then you can move on to families and people who are technically citizens and all the rest of them. You also don't necessarily have to do it just through force. I mean you can pay a lot of people to leave.
You can do self-deportation. What I would like to talk about, and this is something that I think is very important because I think it feeds into remigration, is I would like to see a system of preferences explicitly for indigenous Europeans within European countries. I actually think indigenous Europeans on an ethnic basis should get a leg up in jobs and education.
Basically, the re reverse of what exists now. I think that's one way to take away the job market. I think if you are an ethnic citizen of your country, this wouldn't quite work in America, at least not yet, but I think it would work in Europe. I think you actually should get official privileges, and those privileges should not be available to others regardless of legal status.
Yeah, I'll have to check out the uh Projax brothers.
Want to thank Countermeasures again for the big super chat. That's much appreciated.
Also want reconstructed Yman for the $50. Thank you so much.
Who else wants to argue about ketchup versus M.
Playing classical? Now I'm just checking out random comments. Donald Dator playing classical music is a hate crime to nons that is still legal. Yeah, I mean that's one of the best ways to make them leave, right? You just play it outside the store or whatever else. so much. There's an entire industry in America of at at nightclubs, at bars, at convenience stores, even about what you are allowed to do with dress codes, with music, with programs that can discourage the clientele that you don't want. And everybody knows what you mean by that.
And this is what I mean when I say all of American life is about trying to escape the consequences of the civil rights movement. like this is what it is and we can't talk about it. We can't be honest about it. The minute we're honest about it, you get shut down. So, you basically have an entire culture even among businesses of just sneaking around and lying to everybody else and also lying to ourselves. But that is fundamentally what you need to know to run a business because what does it mean to run a business in this country? It basically means keeping nons out and keeping white people in.
Yeah, Carnival. Somebody brought up Carnival Cruise. I mean, or Spirit Airlines or whatever it was called. I mean, once once it becomes like theirs, once that becomes like or Red Lobster or something like that or, you know, when they uh when the check cashes and they they want to spend a lot when they go to the Cheesecake Factory, like that's where they want to go when they want to spend big. I mean, it's a [ __ ] nightmare. Like, we all know it. You don't want that.
Yeah, rip spirit. Rest in piss. Ah, Spirit Alliance. It was funny. The thing about Spirit Alliance, too, is of course it was going to get saved. It was going to get merged with something else. And Elizabeth Warren started screaming and beating her chest about like, "Oh, this is so evil. We have to prevent this at all costs." And then, of course, you know, it just went bankrupt. And then she like somehow managed to brag about that. And it's like, "You killed it."
Like, what are you bragging about? I mean, none of these people have ever actually built anything or done anything.
An 18% tip will be automatically added to your bill. Cody hawk pros slavery.
Yeah. How many how many things that used to be unspoken in America and around the world. You now have to have explicit mandatory rules set down because you can't trust people to do this. you you you offer you have a certain tip, right? And it maybe goes this way or that way depending on how good the service is, but is it expected you to tip? Okay, blacks aren't going to tip. Okay, well now everybody has to do the 18% tip. And by the way, this is bled over and everything else because people think you can just act like savages to customer service. Certain people think you can act like savages and so now everybody has to get roped into this kind of thing. And you're seeing this with everything. I mean there there are so many things where you could just take for or even policies when it comes to returning things or exchanging things or anything like that when everything becomes a racket and everything becomes a scam. This is how social trust collapses and we're seeing this throughout all of America. I mean even something as petty as just being able to call somebody on the phone. I mean I practically never answer my phone any more. Why? Because 90% of what I get are scammer Indians.
I don't think I'm alone in that.
Yeah, someone said like don't poop on the beach. Yeah, that was a norm that we all took for granted. Now that's gone forever because of uh elite human capital. They're better than us, guys.
You don't understand.
Try that in Texas. Yeah, build like a giant monkey statue in Texas. Nobody seems to do anything like that.
Counter measures. Just seems like all the tactics we've explored thus far have failed. The Leviathan that lords over us stops everything before it gets off the ground. Well, certainly I know everybody is looking at this return of the land project that is now facing this lawsuit.
I've heard different perspectives about who's behind it and why it's being founded or why it's being lodged and whatever else. Now, that was always inevitable. I mean, I think that was actually kind of the purpose. But I will say this, there there are things in motion now that I think are much more advanced than anything that happened before. Both in terms of membership organizations, both in terms of parallel structures, in terms of gettogethers and networking with people who may not be explicitly identified with us, but are adjacent. You know, the type of people who say things like, "Kev, I agree with everything you're saying, but for God's sakes, don't tell anybody I said that."
That kind of thing. And I'm fine with people like that. you need those guys, too. Like, we all we all have our different parts to play on this spectrum here. And a lot more of that is happening. But what we're all kind of waiting on is the boot to come off our neck a little bit so you can move out into the open. To some extent, that has happened online. I mean, compare the situation that we had before to the situation that we had now, and that was a reflection of political power. Now, it could shift right back and go way more restrictive than it used to be. But the fact is we are able to raise money. We are able to do basic financial services.
We are able to have accounts. We're able to operate businesses. We are able to put on events. None of these things were even really possible a few years ago. At least they were a lot more difficult. So there has this thing doesn't just remain static.
And also even when the ruling class is united, there are still divisions within it. And they're going to try to use we can use those divisions against him. I think James Burnham said something that like liberty to paraphrase him, liberty is just the space that exists between contending elites and that space has been growing recently at least online and at least when it comes to things like free speech and being able to move money around.
Randall flag $2. I'm attending an IRL meetup in a major city this summer with some big names is what I mean. I won't say who, but they're a very big deal.
Despite the Fed accusations, IRL meetups are possibly the best thing possible. I agree. And you know, when people say, "Oh, feds or whatever else." It's like, "Well, look, I mean, as long as you're not like discussing illegal stuff, if there's a Fed that infiltrates or something, he's going to show up to one meeting, go back to his bosses, and say there's nothing there, and that's the end of it."
I mean, I promise you if you've been going to conferences and meetings and involved in different groups, at some point, I mean, I in my case, I know with absolute certainty, there was this one dude who didn't know me, but knew somebody I knew. And I just remember immediately getting like the sense of like, okay, this guy's a fed. And then a year or two go by and I said, where's so and so? Oh, he dropped off the face of the earth after this happened. I'm like, okay, he was a fed. Like, you're going to encounter these people at some point.
But I mean the way you protect yourself is the way you should be conducting yourself anyway, which is you don't go to a public meeting and say, "What we need to do is, you know," and then you announce your your diabolical plan of illegal activity. It's not like you should do that anyway.
So I wouldn't I wouldn't get too paranoid about it. And I I'll say this, too, as far as the doxing goes. said before, I think that doxing to some extent, unfortunately, maybe inevitable in some ways, but if you're a writer anyway, you can't do like what I did for years and years and years where you just write under a a pen name that is somewhat well known within the movement but linked to you and hope to just get away with it and do something else. I don't think that's going to be possible for too much longer. I don't think it's possible now with with AI. I mean, this is going to be a much more constant thing. But I'll say this too. When it comes to as as has happened to me and has happened to a lot of others, when it comes to something like doxing, it's not going to be a Fed and it's not going to be like a left-wing spy. It's probably going to be a traitor or somebody who got led in in a way that you couldn't really prevent.
You know, somebody's wife and they have a fight and they get divorced and to get revenge they like dox all these people.
like you see stuff like that.
How does one prevent that? How how does one you can't to some extent. So you just have to communicate and conduct yourself in such a way where if you have a lot to lose, you need to be thinking to yourself, what am I prepared to lose?
How can I be most effective in this movement? And if I am not willing to lose these things, not out of cowardice, but because I think it would make me less effective in this cause, which is the way to think about it, then I just should not be putting these kinds of communications in writing or anything else. Ironically, I think IRL is probably the safest thing in a lot of ways because when people get docked or they really get screwed over, generally it's online communications. It's not because what I saw this guy at dinner one day. Doesn't work that way.
Donald Ducttater. Eventually, we will collectively shame Kevin into switching his gimmick. Gimmick. Gimmick, you say?
To pounding a pint glass of organic homemade kombucha.
Pad kombucha, but got to say I like Monster better with the Monster K.
You want me to switch over to a more uh Hyperborean energy drink? I'm all ears.
Yeah, Rand Flag talks about the uh Fed posting. I mean, who knows, right? Slam the raw milk, Kev. Oh, man.
Raw milk posting. That would be uh that'd be an interesting one.
Big Red Dragon 123 $2. Thank you so much. Congrats on the spam on the show getting big enough to warrant spam bots, by the way, both in the chat and on that one impersonator in the VOD comments.
Thank you so much. It's a big milestone.
We're all very proud. We do now have the spam bots.
Get raw milk. Donald Ducker is going to the mat for uh I have to start drinking raw milk now.
I suppose I got to do it, right? I mean, got to do it for the content.
And 11. Thanks so much. $1 unappreciated underappreciated reason why our problems are so exacerbated today is because they are mostly experienced vicariously experiencing problems firsthand make them feel far more personal and compelling. Yes, I would say one counter well not a counter but something also to keep in mind though is when people experience something that is counter to their previous political position and what I'm thinking of course is something like a parent loses a child killed by an illegal or non-white or something like that.
A lot of times you don't see a conversion so to speak. Instead they kind of double down on what happened before. Weirdly enough, I think you see conversions when it comes to less serious things. I mean, you get into an accident with an illegal immigrant and the illegal doesn't have car insurance, so you end up having to pay the whole thing and he just flees before the cops show up and you end up getting charged and your insurance goes up and you pay the cost, but they don't pay anything.
That's the kind of thing where people like go to war, get get set on a different path entirely. Weirdly enough, when it's a really traumatic thing, like a lifealtering catastrophe that you don't really come back on, it's almost too much to change somebody's mind. You almost have for your own like emotional integrity. You have to like double down on what you believe before, even if it's been disproven. But I think the the kind of petty frust I mean they're serious but the less serious frustrations and conflicts that we encounter all the time. I think those are the things that really push people in a certain direction.
Yeah. I mean Django and change brings up the the obvious point. The guy in Springfield said he wished his kid was killed by a white man instead of a Haitian. Right.
Was it Jeremy McKenzie on Marlet this week? Was he on Yeah, I think it was.
Everyone was trying to bully Mark into doing a live stream review of him trying raw milk or around here we call it dairy maxing. All right, we're gonna have to start dairy maxing around here. I think it was Jeremy Mackenzie on Marlet this week. I didn't see it, but I did see the advertisement for the show and I was on something with McKenzie a while back.
Might have been around New Year's or something like that.
Do you think that the parents that ask Kiss nuns after they've killed their their child's children are handled by an organization? Well, we know I think uh academic agent or McIntyre, a few others were talking about this. Roy Egg Nationalist talked about this too. We know that there was part of the DOJ, I think it was called like the community relations organization or something like that that would actually go out to these parents and mentor them about what to do in these situations. And of course, what they were really doing is they were saying, "You got to go out there and say this isn't about race. You got to go out there saying this isn't political. You got to go out there saying trust the system and everything else. And we're doing this because we don't want to exacerbate community tensions and we don't want to exacerbate division. And this is so important. Now, of course, this is the opposite the way the system handles anything where, say, a white police officer shoots a black kid, even if it's justified, because then they go out there and say, "This is not just about this. This is about America on trial. This is a grave social problem.
Everybody needs to get involved and there are riots and there's destruction and people get hurt and people get killed and everybody suffers. But somehow then it doesn't matter. Somehow then we don't actually have to manage community tensions. In fact, it is virtuous and good to exacerbate community tensions. Now we know the DOJ did this. But again, elections do have some consequences. The Trump administration defunded all this. And I will say this, I am not totally familiar with what happened within the bureaucracy because if you look at some of the funding, the funding supposedly continued, but then again, you don't know who's in charge at this point and exactly how the programming operates the same way or whatever else. But I will say this, you haven't seen any cases like that, have you? not recently where you had like a big case like that and then the parents go out there and have a big press conference and are almost like overjoyed about this thing that's happened to him and then start giving a speech about how much they love immigrants and like tacos or something like that. You just don't see that. And I'm not sure it was as straightforward as some people said where the DOJ like literally gives people a script and says you better read this or what you know or else. But I'm sure especially if somebody's emotionally unstable as anyone would be in that situation, somebody from the government says and says, "Oh, read the script.
It'll be better for everyone and it'll help with the prosecution." And oh, you can see why parents would do that kind of thing. In fact, I mean, I've I've seen at least a couple cases where you've you've got parents like openly saying pushing back against this kind of thing, saying the government is too lenient on crime. We need to be doing more. We need to be punishing these people. I don't think you would have seen that even four years ago.
Vinegar on fries. Yeah. No, I do vinegar on fries. Certain kind of vinegar, of course. Bigfoot stick. I love these names. Kevin, with the push for total remigration, what do you think what that would look like? Seems like a civil war would be inevitable if it came to fruition. Not necessarily. I mean, this is I would encourage people to see what the Institute for Remigration puts out.
There are this is something that's been talked about by a lot of different people and it's you can get total remigration without all at once. There is an argument sometimes to I mean this is like Mchavelli type stuff. You get power, you got to go down hard. You got to throw everything you've got right off the bat. And it's actually politically stupid to try to be moderate. Like if you're going after somebody, you got to go after them with everything you have right off the bat or you're just going to make them stronger. Some people would say that this was Trump's mistake with immigration, but there are other things that you can do. And if we're talking about something like total remigration where you really don't have the legal structure in place to get that done, at least let's let's limit to our discussion to Europe for now in some of these countries. Well, what can you do?
You can go all out with certain categories. 100% getting rid of the people like say illegals, 100% getting rid of criminals, 100% abolishing these human rights courts and and get these special benefits that they get and everything else. Going after remittances, making sure that if they're here on a visa or some sort of asylum thing, but then they go back to their home country on vacation or something, making that a criminal offense, confiscating their wealth as I think it was Denmark that actually did that. And this was under like a social democratic government. There are lots of different things you can do where you kind of chop the salami so to speak and make it a little easier to go to the next step and eventually you can get total remigration. But I think the way you do it without it just going to like civil war right off the bat is you go for 100% enforcement on certain categories and then once you've got that you go on to the next category.
There are a lot of people out there who have put together very detailed plans and I imagine with this new institute and with the conference this weekend this is going to be a real topic for and with Martin's new book this is going to be a topic where this is explained in great detail like how exactly we do it these are the ways we do it and obviously it's going to depend depending on what country you're talking about how many people we're talking about the legal system that's in place etc dictator total remigration is normally racism. It's a euphemism for blatant nivist exclusivity. It will cause chimpouts, but that's part of the plan to some extent. I mean, I think that there is a depending on how you manage it. I think there's an argument that Minneapolis Bowling Frogs out. Thank you so much.
Bowling Frog salute.
There's there's an argument that when you in Minneapolis when the left really rolled out and of course, you know, the two deaths probably had a lot to do with this. You don't have that.
maybe you're in a different situation that it might have intimidated the Trump administration into taking not as hard a line. But there's also an argument that and there were some we had shows about this and we talked about this to some extent sometimes you might want the confrontation.
You you go there, you try to get the left to go nuts, to chimp out, as the kids say, and then that gives you the justification for breaking up these networks, for confiscating the assets of these groups, for arresting the leaders, and if things get really out of hand for invoking the Insurrection Act. But this is not the kind of thing you can just do casually. Like, that has to be part of the plan. And it's a real question. And again, I tend to be friendlier to the administration than a lot of people, but I don't think I'm being out of line by saying I'm not sure there was a wellthoughtout plan for, okay, how is this going to progress in Minneapolis?
Instead, it just kind of turned into we're going to do this and then the situation kept escalating and they just kind of assumed it would be taken care of.
Need AB shirt countermeasures me. Ajab shirt with black death thrash metal font would rock all the time. Maybe stickers too. Easier to produce from home and not expensive to buy. It's doable.
I think we can make that happen.
We definitely Yeah, it's a very good idea. I think we can do that.
Love metal. You and me both. Counter measures. You and me both. really that's responsible for all this. If we if we go back if we go back far enough, man, the gateway drug into far right alone would say chop the salami. Well, salami slicing. That's the term.
I mean that that I didn't come up with that. That's what other people have used specifically in regard to remigration.
Like this is how we deal with it. Oh, good. Another spam post breaking. This isn't good. I would recommend nobody click on that link.
Drop the monster and try Jaco go. [ __ ] is delicious. It uses stevia instead of sucralose. I don't know. Stevia is a bit hit or miss, I found, but we'll see.
I'll try it. How about that? Promise you.
>> Jaco go. I've never seen that. And uh it's something I'm going to have to order in advance. That might be difficult to do. I mean, the by its very nature, this is the kind this is the kind of thing that you get when you're outside and you're just like, "Oh god, I need it right now." You have to just be able to run into it.
Yeah. You have to go to Jaco directly.
It's the only way to get it.
Man 11 $1. Thank you so much. Do you think the lands and peoples living in disputed regions peripheral to Europe, islands in the Med, the Caucases, Anatolia, etc. are racially, geographically European. Well, it's not a question of where they live. It's a question of what they are. I mean, it would be like saying, are Mexicans white? Like, some of them are. Yeah, absolutely. But what does that prove? I mean, that's that's true of like, you know, oh, what about the Colombians? What about Argentinians?
What about people in Chile? I mean, in some ways, Argentina is whiter than this country at this point, but what does that mean? I mean, it's it's not a and certainly this is true with the caucuses. This is true with Turkey. This is true with hell, Afghanistan, depending on who you're talking about, but it's a question of who they are specifically. I mean, it's not a it's not so much a question of where they live other than the ratio, I guess. So, that's how I would answer that. I mean, white people can be anywhere. And until recently, we could say, yeah, by definition, everybody who lives here was white. But unfortunately that's not true anymore.
We can say of course if you take a step back looking at the uh at the map you know the and again this is Burnham the slow retreat of western civilization. I mean there was a time where we could say with confidence that South Africans almost by definition were white. And if you said well what about the blacks in South Africa? You'd say well they're not South African. They're just the natives or the whatever they are. But now obviously we don't think in that way.
I mean we also we can have a hugely entertaining discussion about who counts as white and who doesn't and everything else. I don't think that's necessarily the most productive thing, but that's usually because it ends with somebody calling me a [ __ ] and then I get all upset and cry myself to sleep.
Bill Parker won. I saw a death metal perform once. The audience was grunting and growling as well.
We have two debates. The debates are about the different kinds of mel that are important. And we have the debates about the ketchup and mayo.
Kevin should be allowed this one. Jewish refreshment.
I'm the only one who's allowed to have it. I'm taking it back. I'm nationalizing this.
This is all done, actually.
Oh, perfect.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, that's you. Okay. Of go. I was like, man, somebody's on point. It's you.
Never mind.
Got to remember. I love it all, man.
Heavy Speed, Thrash, Death, Black.
Back when the Onion was funny, which was like 20 years ago. I remember it was something like uh what was it? It was like a man who loves diverse kinds of music lists like 20 different forms of metal. It was like the only kind he doesn't like was rat metal.
These are debates for primary season, gentlemen. We must unite on condiments for the general election. That's right.
That is how we conduct ourselves here.
We unite on the key questions. We believe in democratic centralism here.
We debate freely, but then once the party committee comes up with a decision, one must align with that decision. Must be you be considered a traitor to the cause.
Can we ban the spam post? There's got to be a way to do that.
Yeah, we have to look into that. Yeah, no rap metal. Metal is our thing.
Absolutely. Countermeasures. And thank you again.
All right, guys. It's about 8:40.
Anybody got anything else? Ready to call tonight?
All right, guys. Thank you so much.
Really appreciate it. But I want to close on this. There's a lot going on right now. And I would pay very close attention. And I'm not just BSing you.
There's going to be another one from Randle Flag here. Let me read that.
Randle Flag $2. Kevin, hot take on midterms besides the Ohio governor. Poly market is heating up and lots of easy money on the table. PSA stat of 40% of Gen Z men admit a type of gambling addiction. Bleak.
Well, honestly, I think it's going to come down to what happens with Iran. I mean, Trump keeps saying, "Oh, we're on the brink of a deal." And then it collapses. I mean, it's been going on for months now. I feel like I've seen the exact same announcement of Iran like 20 times. And it's going to gas prices and inflation. It's going to be the economy. I mean, if he can't get out of there, certainly within the month, I mean, barring some out of the blue thing like, oh, the the government just like spontaneously collapses and the sha comes back or something like that, which I don't see happening. And I don't think anybody has reasonably expected that, then this is going to cost them and I think they'll lose the house. And you look at the polls in Maine, you look at the polls even in Texas and places like that. Yeah, I don't trust the polls, but it's pretty hard to be enthusiastic from a Republican point of view that no, this is going swimmingly, like this is going to go great. People are fed up with the economy above all other things. And unless he can meaningfully reverse that, that is going to be the story of the midterms. And people can say, well, you know, the MAGA endorsement is doing all this stuff. It's like, yeah, but that's the primaries. I mean, you're dealing with mostly boomers who watch Fox News, and that is enough to win primaries, and that's a real political force, and that's the political force that matters on the right in terms of electoral politics. But is that enough to win a general election? Is that the independent voters? No, it's not. It's just not. And also, you're just fighting history because the president's party never wins the midterms of any problem. $2. Speaking of bots with links, anyone ever watched scammer payback on YouTube? Oh yeah, subcontinent trash scamming with links, emails, and phone calls with non mules here in the US. Diversity is our strength. It is. Do not click on it. Do not redeem. It is very gratifying to see that.
Yeah. Rand flag points. I have a mini event for work. It cost $80 to fill up every five days. It's killing me. And you're speaking for so many other people with that. I mean, most people are not paying attention to the kinds of questions that we're talking about. And if they are, they notice that a neighborhood's getting less white. They may move somewhere.
They think about where their kids are going to go to a public school. All this kind of stuff. But in terms of what they vote on and in terms of what they think about, they're thinking about inflation.
They're thinking about affordability.
They're thinking about housing prices.
They're thinking about gas prices.
Trump doesn't go into Iran. I think the midterms look way better than they had any right to for the president's party going into the midterms. And also, frankly, we'll see what happens with Cuba, right? I mean, that's another thing that is probably going to happen very soon. If I had to bet, if I had to gambling bet, if I had to bet on Poly Market or whatever it is, does America go into Cuba? I'm betting yes. But we'll see. And depending on how that plays out, I mean, if it's if it's just a oneanddone thing like Venezuela was, maybe that's enough to change things. Especially a lot of people in Florida would certainly be very happy about it. But if it becomes like a long drawn out thing or some people die or or something else happens, then maybe not.
But I I think the biggest thing is going to be Iran and gas prices. And I do not see that working to the president's advantage no matter what. Yeah, like their cigars. Countermeasures is right.
Yeah, if we all get we get expensive gas, but we get cheap Cuban cigars, it balances out. That would that would be pretty sweet, actually.
Losing the Senate and Alto or Clarence not getting replaced this term would be a big loss. Yeah. I mean, again, politics doesn't matter and elections don't matter until they do and then suddenly it actually matters quite a bit in terms of what you're allowed to do. I mean, where are we if the Supreme Court is majority Brown Jackson? What can we realistically do even in terms of building parallel structures and all this kind of stuff? I think that's a valid question.
Can I run my truck on cigars? Well, I mean, if we're creative and we're white people, we can come up with that. We can run up with What's the word? What's the uh the term they did it back in West Virginia all the time where you run the Is it coal burning or coal running? You know what I'm talking about with the pick of coal? Yeah, we'll do that only with cigar. That would be amazing.
>> Coal rolling.
>> Coal rolling. Thank you. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Well, coal burning is the the bigger problem. The two the two are very opposed. Do one >> one very healthy cultural practice and one not so healthy cultural practice.
>> Yeah. Roll coal on the coal burners. That's true.
Right-wing activism.
>> Have a lot of good shirts. Can we run cars on Haitian sugarcane? I don't know if we want to go back into Haiti though.
Calling D Royal Cole burning. That's a right-wing egirl thing. So true, fam. So true.
Is there one? Is there one that's not a complete catastrophe. This is why I never engage with these people. It just It's just one disaster after another.
Each one worse than the one that came before. H. And the people keep falling for it. But this one's different. I think they're all the same, man. I don't know what to tell you.
Who has benefited from the US arresting Maduro? I think gas prices would actually be higher if they didn't do that. But, you know, again, it doesn't matter because Iran kind of cancels that out.
If you had just done that and you get the cheap gas and you don't go into Iran, we'd be in a different situation.
Even Ashley Sinclair. Even Ashley.
Especially Ashley Sinclair. That was That's like ancient lore.
Oh man.
Israel's cloning vats. Did you see that?
Yeah. Yeah.
All right. Before I start raging out about right-wing girls, I think I think we'll call this one a night. Really good chat tonight, guys. Thank you so much for joining us. Check out the Remigration Summit this weekend. There's going to be some big news coming up. I promise you, it's going to it's going to shake up this country. And I would look very closely at what the institute's going to roll out. You're going to see some realistic proposals. And this is going to be the big thing. And this is the agenda that needs to unite the oxident right now. So, I'm Kevin Deanna.
We'll talk again real soon. Thank you for joining us.
Ähnliche Videos
VALORANT's Latest 'Exclusive' Tier Bundle is Rough...
KangaValorant
17K views•2026-05-28
Flight Attendant Mocks Poor Looking Black Woman — Mid Air Announcement Exposes Her Real Power
SkyboundStories-b4r
184 views•2026-05-28
I FIXED My Friend’s Blown Turbo RX-8… Then Sold It
Cameron-RX8
134 views•2026-05-28
NewsWatch 12 at 5: Top Stories
NewsWatch12
1K views•2026-05-28
Simon Jordan & Danny Murphy deliver PREDICTIONS for Arsenal's Champions League FINAL with PSG
talkSPORTArsenal
6K views•2026-05-28
Botting is OUT OF CONTROL in Classic WoW (Again)...
SolheimGaming
108 views•2026-05-28
The "AI Job Apocalypse" is CANCELLED!
WesRoth
9K views•2026-05-28
STREET FIGHTER 6 - INGRID Story Walkthrough @ 4K 60ᶠᵖˢ ✔
RajmanGamingHD
12K views•2026-05-28
