The video provides a rigorous technical framework for what is essentially the industrialization of digital thirst traps. It is a sharp reminder that cutting-edge AI is often most quickly perfected in the service of our most basic commercial impulses.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
The Best Video Model For AI OFM (+Blind test)追加:
What's up guys? Welcome to another video. And in today's video, I have prepared for you an ultimate AIFM video models comparison. But it's not going to be just a normal comparison where I'm going to tell you, okay, this is the best model. Use this model. No, I have actually prepared a five blind tests where I'm going to play the actual video and I'm not going to tell you which model is which. Then I'm going to rank it based on my preference in these five categories. And at the end of the video, you are going to see which model is which. So you cannot be biased. Okay. So before we start with the comparisons, there are like some five basic AIM images that you would most likely see on some Instagram. You know, some mirror selfie, mirror selfie, mirror selfie.
That's like the most common. And then I also took like a square picture that's not a mirror selfie. These are the prompts. This video is fully transparent. I did all of the generations here, but I'm going to save you $20 so you don't have to do the generations yourself. Plus, you won't be biased. And we are going to rank the models in the categories of the motion of the video, facial consistency, face quality, facial expressions, and like the overall. So let's get started with the first image which is like a basic mirror selfie. You see some dark-haired woman and the prompt goes like this. I'm not going to read it here. So let's get started. Okay. So first of all I'm going to play the video and not say anything.
And you see right like from the start of the video the face quality on these two is like okay but the face quality on this third one is like too AI too cartoonish. So, this is definitely a big nogo if you want to achieve realism. And at the end of the video, you see that in the first model, the phone stayed here, which is obviously a And in the second video, like nothing weird is happening. If you look at the motions of the video, like all of these models have like a good motion, nothing weird. If you look at the facial expressions, again, the third model is doing like weird facial expressions. And if we look at the one and two, we see that the facial expressions are to be honest kind of similar. Maybe this one is in my opinion winning in the realism of the facial expressions.
But overall, I would definitely go with the second model. Okay, so let's head to the prompt number two, which is this woman. Again, I'm going to play the video first so you can do a decision for yourself.
You see that like the third model is making the videos a little bit shorter, but it doesn't really matter.
So, what I wanted to test in the prompt is like the motion of the mirror if it's going to match the motion of the hand.
So, we have like a realistic video. And you see like the weird thing about the first model, the phone is like not moving as all like as she almost have like a perfect hand, right? So that's kind of weird. And like other than that again in the third one, I feel like the skin quality is is a little bit plastic.
And like if you look at the motions of the actual videos, the one and two have like uh they have like a fluid motion, but the third one has like a slow motion motion, right? So this is like one one of the best giveaways of AI videos. They they are like almost any slow motion. So be careful with that. So again, I'm going to definitely choose the second one. And now let's head to prompt number three, which is this Asian woman. So what we can see at first is that the third model did something like super weird with the hair. You see the hair is moving itself.
So this is definitely a extreme giveaway of an AI video.
So again we are going to compare model one and two. This will be our competitors.
And to be honest, I guess it's like pretty simple choice because if you look at the speeds of the video one and two, you see that the second one is like like fluid. Boom boom boom boom boom. But the first one is like in a slow motion, which is definitely extreme giveaway of an AI video. So again, we have the winner number two, which kind of sucks because we only have five videos. So, it means that the second model is going to win the overall. But stay till the end because you still don't know which model it is and how are the other videos going to perform. Okay, so now let's head to prompt number four. Okay, so let's play the video here. What I actually like wanted to test is like if the AI influencer is going to smile, how fake and realistic is it going to look? Because you know, you know when someone smiles like with an extremely large mouth, it's going to look unreal, right? So, let's see. And like you see that the laugh of the third one is like okay. Maybe here the laugh is like little bit too much but nothing extreme. And like here she didn't laugh that much which is like a safe option for the video model definitely. And like here, I'm not actually sure which one to choose. Like from the facial consistency, everything looks like okay.
From the motion perspective, nothing seems really like to be in the slow motion. Maybe the third one again. Here you see when she puts down the phone, it's maybe a little bit slowed. I'm not sure. Here you can see that the light from the camera just went off for no reason, which like doesn't happen in real life. So here like for the overall I would go with number one because here like the laugh is too much in my opinion. You see in the first one we have definitely the best light and the best shadows definitely and in the second one the light disappeared and in the third one she was putting her hand down in a slow motion.
So for this comparison let's go with number one. Okay. And before I reveal the actual video models, let's head to the last prompt, which is a square image, which might give a little bit different results. So, let's see the video.
See, this is like a kind of a basic prompt. This is going to be super hard to decide.
So first thing let's see that we have this reflection of the window like if it changes it's like not changing at all which is like supposed good thing because the camera is not moving right you see like in my taste the first one has like this detail this contrast to it which in my opinion adds to the realism of the images but like all of them looks okay.
If we look at the motion, nothing seems to be like in a slow motion. In the third one, I believe that this like hand/finger is Yeah, this is definitely weird. So the weird hands and the weird fingers are giving off the AI images or not really because like if you look at the start of the actual video, she's putting her she's putting her hand here and this is like her thumb. So this is okay. This is not a minus point for the model.
And here like in my opinion from the point of facial consistency the face drifted a little bit in the second model from this to this. You see this is a little bit of a different girl. And the face morphing is like another giveaway of an AI video.
So I definitely won't go with the second one. And the one and three are like kind of similar. Nothing like too much is happening in the video. So here I'm again going with the number one because in my taste the contrast and the shadows are more realistic. Okay. So from my comparison the winner is model number two and the second one is model number one. And now I'm going to tell you which was which. But before I tell you do your own testing, compare it yourself. Play the video again again. Okay. So as I said for me the winner is number two.
And number two is Clink 3.0.
The second one in my opinion is Cense 2.0 which was the first model and the third one is one 2.7. So let's play the first video you know just for the last comparison. And the one in the middle is the winner for me. Clink 3.0. The one on the left cedance 2.0 is second and the worst is one 2.7.
1 2.7 actually might get a little bit better if they release the open source model, but we will see about that. And yeah guys, you have like seen it in the videos. The overall quality and the motions was like definitely best for Clink 3.0, but sometimes the face drifted a little bit from the original.
So for your exact AIOM use case, what do I actually recommend is, you know, load up Cense 2.0, load up Cling 3.0, Now put the same image, put the same prompt, run all of them and what gives you better result, use this one. Okay, so that's it for today's video. If you want to learn more about AI OFM, join the free discord in the description where there are tons of free resources, people helping each other, drop a like and subscribe, comment the video, which model one is for you, and I'm going to see you in the next one. Bye.
関連おすすめ
VALORANT's Latest 'Exclusive' Tier Bundle is Rough...
KangaValorant
17K views•2026-05-28
Flight Attendant Mocks Poor Looking Black Woman — Mid Air Announcement Exposes Her Real Power
SkyboundStories-b4r
184 views•2026-05-28
I FIXED My Friend’s Blown Turbo RX-8… Then Sold It
Cameron-RX8
134 views•2026-05-28
NewsWatch 12 at 5: Top Stories
NewsWatch12
1K views•2026-05-28
Simon Jordan & Danny Murphy deliver PREDICTIONS for Arsenal's Champions League FINAL with PSG
talkSPORTArsenal
6K views•2026-05-28
Botting is OUT OF CONTROL in Classic WoW (Again)...
SolheimGaming
108 views•2026-05-28
The "AI Job Apocalypse" is CANCELLED!
WesRoth
9K views•2026-05-28
STREET FIGHTER 6 - INGRID Story Walkthrough @ 4K 60ᶠᵖˢ ✔
RajmanGamingHD
12K views•2026-05-28











