A motion for judicial clarification is a legal document filed when a party believes a court order contains inconsistencies, ambiguities, or errors that require the court to provide additional explanation or correction. In this case, Sarah Boone filed an amended motion for clarification regarding alimony payment information and telephone communication provisions in a supplemental final judgment, requesting the court to clarify payment addresses, online payment options, visitation status, payment timing, and cost responsibilities for telephone calls with her minor child.
Approfondir
Prérequis
- Pas de données disponibles.
Prochaines étapes
- Pas de données disponibles.
Approfondir
Sarah Boone Files another Motion for Clarification 05-27-26 w/ @summaloudmouth #sarahbooneAjouté :
Well, the paper terrorist human migraine known as Saraboon has submitted another stupid motion for clarification. And so that's what we're going to cover tonight. Hello everyone. I'm hear me out. Welcome to my channel. And let me turn that alarm off there. The main point of this channel is to laugh. We look at stupid people, provide commentary, and that's what we do. So if you don't like commentary channels, this is not the place for you. But if you do enjoy what you see here, consider subscribing because the many subjects we cover such as Sarah Boon, Lauren Armstrong, Diane DS, Robert Telis, Cory Richens, the format's all the same. We just look at them and laugh, read their stupid stuff, and sometimes I'll put on a wig like I am today. So, uh, thank you to everyone here live with us in chat.
Hello to the replay crew. Please remember to hit the like button so I can feed my cats. Uh, let's just get this thing going, huh? All right.
Hello everyone.
Welcome, welcome, welcome. It is in fact Thursday evening and I have a special guest with me today. You all know her as uh I can't think of a joke right now.
Here she is.
>> She look mouth.
>> Hello. Hi guys.
>> Um so yeah I mean this this motion is short everyone. So, we're going to talk more about the purpose behind this motion rather than maybe the substance of it. Um, it's only 5 and a half minutes of me reading it.
Uh, but I do put on the wig and I did do, as I showed Suma, I did do a new Sarah accent. Um, it just kind of devel I'm I'm terrible with accents and maintaining the voice. It just kind of fluctuates as I go through it. Other than >> Kayla, I can do Kayla.
>> Yeah, you're very >> all the time.
But that's because it's really Dexter's voice that I've done for years, so I could just continue to do it. Um, so this, of course, she wrote in a motion on at the end of April requesting clarification.
We did I think I did a video on that one. I don't even know. She Yeah, I did.
Her stupid motion for clarification >> for her motion for clarification.
>> So, let's listen to this one. It's five minutes. We'll pause it certain times, but then at the end, we'll talk about what we think is going on with why she wrote it. All right. So, let's go ahead and start here.
Respondents amended motion for judicial clarification and re-haring regarding alimony aars correction of payment information and telephone communication stated in the supplemental final judgment comes now proay respondent Sarah Kboon pursuant to Florida rule of civil procedure 1.530 and respectfully files this amended motion for judicial clarification andor rehearing regarding alimony rear correction of payment information and telephone communication stated in the supplemental final judgment. In support of this amended motion, respondent states on April 7th, 2026, this court entered its supplemental final judgment.
in this matter after final hearing on August 25th, 2025. On April 22nd, 2026, respondent timely filed her motion for clarification and or reharing regarding inconsistencies in the court's findings concerning alimony aars.
One thing I wanted to say, she just uses words in terms of like this was timely filed. I did all the right. She doesn't really do anything correctly, but she just copies the language of other motions and puts them in there without understanding they actually have meaning.
>> I think in part because she's not really writing them.
>> Gotcha. Well, she's hand.
>> Huh?
>> She's You mean she's plagiarizing somebody else's?
>> Yeah. Oh, or somebody's writing it for her.
>> But it's her handwriting.
>> Yeah. Well, I mean, they're not physically writing it for her.
>> You think somebody's in jail writing it with for her?
>> No, I think somebody is outside of jail writing it for her.
>> Um, the wig looks better than Sarah's hair has ever looked. Yeah. Somebody made the comment the other day in on a stream >> or a on a comment on a video said >> I think it was our one where we were looking at the trial footage, but when she's in trial and she bends over, her hair does not move.
>> Nope.
>> Like it just stays.
>> It's like her not non-conformist.
It's not budging.
>> Oh, I just remembered what my idea was.
You ch Oh, we'll talk about >> Okay. 26 months. Respondent hereby amends and supplements her previously filed motion to include additional issues arising from the court's order regarding corrected payment deposit information and telephone communication between respondent and the minor child.
Four. In the supplemental final judgment, page 15, section E7, the court orders, all alimony payments, deposits shall be made by cashier check, money order, or certified bank draft made payable to correct pay and mailed with a deposit slip by the due date above to FOC inmate deposits blah blah blah blah blah.
The information I don't know why I'm muted. try to switch position here a sec so I can get a little bit bigger view of the letter.
Um, let's do this.
Sorry, technical difficulties, please.
>> Likes the voice, too. Like, it's it's got a little more of her like forever.
>> Yeah, forever. and like it's just totally not it's it's supposed to be uh emotional yet it carries no emotional weight with it.
>> She's got this she's so she's so like pompous. She's so like >> Yes, your honor.
>> She's like that kid in school that everyone hated, you know.
>> Um if I may please though. Um it it like she just the way she just runs her sentences on I just started talking at on point.3 point three when I had done my first one and then I was like oh no that's a voice and I went went back to the beginning and started again above is incorrect and requires correction to ensure respondent properly receives the court-ordered payments in a timely manner.
>> Oh you got the mouse down on everything.
The correct payment information for money orders, cashier's checks, certified bank drafts needs to be made payable to Sarah Boone blah blah blah blah blah. The correct mailing address is Florida DOC inmate trust fund center station blah blah blah blah blah.
Respondent request also whether petitioner may satisfy the court ordered payments electronically through the approved online system. Yeah, valley girl meets tapeworm. It is definitely kind of valley girlish, but I didn't want it to be Yeah. What's What's cuz she's obviously not that, right?
>> It's not exactly that. It's like a like everything else with her. It's We don't know what where the hell any of it came from.
>> Yeah. This is the finest wig has ever been. It's basic. It's actually That's a funny comment because when I found it, it was just stacked under a bunch of stuff. It's just frizzled on the top. I was like, "Oh, this is going to look terrible."
which provides expedited access to funds and proof of payment at www.correctpay.com/fl.
In the supplemental final judgment, page 15, section E6A, it states, quote, within 90 days of petitioner being identified on Sarah K.
Boon's automated visiting record with a current approved status pursuant to rule 33-601716 FAC petitioner shall make payment number one in the amount of $600 10 petitioners at the very end visitors >> at the very end your inflection is almost has a Mexican vibe like dollar I don't know like I can't do it but there's something about that very end that a little bit Mexican.
>> I don't know. Never mind.
>> He said too much. Like Chichin Chong kind of thing.
>> Oh, gotcha. Gotcha.
>> Yeah.
>> Since September 17, 2025, see exhibit 1.
Respondent requests clarification as to whether the 90-day period begins from the entry of the supplemental final judgment or upon approval of becoming a visitor as stated in the correct dollar amount for payment number one pending her original motion. 11. In the supplemental final judgment, page 13, section D1, it states, quote, beginning May 1st, 2026, mother shall be entitled to one one telephone call per week with minor child. End quote. 12. The court does not specify which party is responsible for the financial costs associated with the weekly call or any holidays referenced within the order.
13. Further, the order does not address whether additional telephone calls may occur if respondent is willing and able to pay all associated costs for such communication.
14. Therefore, necessary clarification is needed for determination of A.
Whether the petitioner is responsible for accepting the weekly and holiday calls at no expense to the respondent.
B whether additional telephone calls may occur upon agreement of the parties and or at respondent's expense.
15. For both parties to properly comply with the court's order, judicial clarification is needed to avoid future disputes regarding payment obligations and the respondents ability to maintain consistent communication with her minor child. 16. Respondent maintains and reasserts all arguments and requests for relief contained within the original motion for clarification and or rehearing filed on April 22nd, 2026, including the pending issues relating to alimony of rears. Wherefore, prosay respondent Sarah K. Boon respectfully request this honorable court to a bring a rehearing and or provide clarification regarding the discrepancies in alimony arars identified in the original motion.
B enter on court record the correct payable to and mailing addresses for alimony payments to be made by petitioner to the respondent. C. Grant the online payment option for petitioner to make expedited payments as an alternative to mailing.
D. Confirm petitioner is an approved visitor. Clarify when first installment payment is due and the correct amount to be paid after respondents pending motion is addressed. E. Clarifying which party is responsible for costs associated with the one one weekly call and holiday calls listed as ordered by the court. If clarify whether respondent is permitted to have reasonable additional telephone communication with her minor child if bears the associated costs.
She left the most important word out of that statement. Who bears the cost? If blank bears associated costs.
>> Well, she's hoping that she's trying to leave it vague. I think I don't know if that's on on purpose or not, but it almost >> I don't think it's on purpose. I think she's stupid cuz she says responded.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> She says this three times by the way, >> right?
>> This this entire letter is like basically the same thing three times. G.
Amen. The supplement.
>> Go ahead.
>> And of final judgment as necessary to reflect all court clarifications and findings. H create such further relief as this honorable court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted this 20th date of May, 2026.
Sarah K.
Oh, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah.
Then it gets a little outro of me screwing up. This was much harder than >> I think the raw recording was like 20 25 minutes. Has been an approved visitor since September 1720.
The information above is incorrect and requires correction to So, we'll we'll probably play it again, but like what do you think is behind this motion besid aside from her being a paper terrorist and we we knew she was going to write again, right? She's never going to stop, right?
>> Yeah.
>> What do you You had theories on why she wrote this.
>> Yeah.
>> The way she did. So, and I you'll hear me say this a lot, but my theory is that I think I mean, what do you think her main objective is here?
>> I have a I have a different thought than I previously shared it. I came up with it when I So, you should tell your tell >> I forgot yours, though. So, tell me or you want mine first?
>> Yeah, go for it.
I don't want to sway your judgment.
>> Yeah. Well, I think that she is something somehow she found found out from an actual human being. Maybe that it doesn't look good that in her first motion to understand she didn't mention her child at all.
>> Mhm.
>> And I think this is her way of first of all, I think she's horrified that she has to pay for the calls.
might I don't know if she understands that. It's hard to It's She's so stupid and lazy that it's hard to know what she really knows and what she doesn't.
>> Yeah. If she's being obtuse or >> So, I mean, can you just hear her on the phone being like I mean, is that ridiculous? Like, >> can you believe this?
>> Yeah, >> Peter.
>> The things I could tell you. I mean, >> things I could say. The things I could say. The things I could say. Um, did you have more on that or you want >> No.
>> So, we had talked >> you know I like you to talk and then I like to fight with you.
>> Yes. Exactly. Um I when we were talking about this on the phone or on text uh my I think my original idea I said there's three option one she what was the >> what is I don't remember what I said the best one was but basically she's writing this almost as like putting it into the court record so someday like it's kind of along your lines of like it looks bad you need to talk about your son but she doesn't really care about that She wants it to be in the court record so that later she could say to her son, "Look, I was trying to get more communication with you." And it was this messed up judgment and I couldn't get it. And uh I wanted extra calls, >> but uh you know, Brian had to agree to it.
>> I remember.
>> Go ahead.
>> Sorry. I remembered what your theory was that she wanted more calls even at her expense so she could harass them.
>> Yeah. Then like even wor that was the worst option. Like she's just trying to get more calls so she can harass Brian.
Even if she pays for it, she's willing to pay for it if she's able to torture somebody, right?
>> I mean, I don't think she I don't think that I personally don't think that's what she's thinking, but >> it's possible. I mean, I don't think she limited, but I also don't think she wants to >> pay for any of the calls. And I also think that she wants to leave things a little bit more kind of ishy like you know if what if I even at my expense if I want more calls and then like the call is supposed to be on a certain day but she doesn't call them that day and she'll give some excuse like you know fire ants or fire or whatever and then she'll call a different day collect because it wasn't the actual call, you know.
>> Yeah. I mean, we already know based on the trial testimony that she was hit and miss, right? She'd call like all the time, multiple times a day for a week, and then she would just ghost.
>> I think she >> she's bored in prison. And she realizes now, well, I don't really have a whole lot to do if I if I don't have the option. you know, she'd be take whatever, hanging out, playing cards if she could find anybody to play with her or messing around with her preparation for something else, and then as soon as she run out of stuff to do or she get pissed or um probably get in a confrontation with another inmate. Oh, you know what I'll do? I'll go yell at Brian for a while. Uh >> yeah, but she can't do that like she can't do that free range, which I don't think she likes. Like she can't that's not the way she like she's a very impulsive caller, texter.
>> That's what she want, >> right? That's what she wants. But that's not what how she's going to be. It's going to have to be a decided time. They have to be home to receive that call, you know.
>> But that's what she's basically saying.
Is it okay?
>> Right.
>> I think she's she's >> Yeah.
>> If she's smart enough, she the way Let me bring this down. Bring this up.
>> Saying like if she knows she has to pay for it anyway or whatever, she's thinking, "Well, maybe if I say that, I'll still pay for the call, but it'll be at my leisure.
Well, I think she's trying to test the water. Let's see here.
>> Yeah.
>> Where is it? Um, >> I have another >> Where's the part where she uh here part 14B? Whether additional telephone calls may occur upon agreement of the parties and or at response respondents expense, which would be her expense.
>> You could also write this another way.
Am I going to be held in contempt to court if I make additional calls at my expense? If she's smart, that's what she's trying to figure out. Am I going to get held in contempt to court if I make more than one call at my expense?
>> I think that's giving her way too much credit.
>> Um, well, I think remember she's not on her own. So, she could could be asking other people in there and then she'd be like, "This is [ __ ] They only give you one call and they say who paid for it. So, what if I want to do another call? Can I just pay for that call?" And then other people in there are probably like, "Girl, the court said one call a week. You don't want to get uh contempt?" And she's like, "Contempt?
What is that?" Like, "Why would I get contempt for for calling if I'm paying for the call?"
>> Yeah. Why?
>> Anything that anything that she pays for, she views as, "Well, how could that be wrong?" So, this is a switch not only from unfettered access and continuing to call, but also it being on somebody else's dime. And now she really is concerned.
She's realiz >> she has an extra call. It was supposed to be one call a week. They're paying they're giving her money for two. So she shut the [ __ ] up.
>> I thought it was only one. They're giving call for money for two calls a month. Not Not a week.
>> No, I think it's two calls a week. I thought it was two calls a week.
>> I think it was two calls a month. And actually, now that I think about it, that is kind of that would make sense if you if the judge was trying to split the cost. Well, she gets one call a week.
She gets money for two calls a month.
Brian pays the other two. That's shared cost. Like >> you're gonna look it up. You don't believe me?
>> Yeah.
>> Wow.
>> Mhm.
>> I'm telling you. I'm telling you it's numbers.
>> Two months. You think it's two months?
>> Yeah.
>> Let's I'm not going to die on this hill.
But if you're wrong, >> I could I could totally be wrong, too. I don't think it was two a week.
>> The reason I Well, let's see. It's pos very possible. I mean, you know, with my small brain >> for two calls a week. Ah, dang it. I got beat by small brain. Dang it.
>> The one and only, my friend.
>> Why would she be getting money for two calls a week when she's only allowed to make one call a week?
>> Because Because they had that discussion and the hearing.
Because first of all, my thing is I don't think Landa Jackson wanted to hear from this [ __ ] again. So, she was like, "You know what? Let's make it two because no one wants to talk to you anyway. But they had that talk about like how if they have more to talk about, they can do a backtoback call.
>> That was Brian's suggestion. But the judge's order says one call a week.
>> It does, but she's giving her a little wiggle room there >> is my thinking just in case >> because she knows who she's dealing with here, what kind of person she's dealing with here. And and she's right. Look at this. You know, like I mean it's two calls a week. Cuz so greedy.
>> Let me see here.
Um, well, I mean, the ruling or the amount. Let's just look at pull up the order.
>> I think that they were just giving her a little extra, you know. I mean, it's only 13.
>> Okay, the phone call is right here.
Let's see.
Beginning May 1st, 2026, mother shall be entitled to one phone call per week >> as well as an additional call in the birthday, Thanksgiving, and Christmas.
So, three additional calls.
>> Yeah, but they're paying for two, I guess, just in case, you know, it's not that >> I think it's two per month. Let's see here.
I think it's broken out in the footnote.
I seeing the entire thing. Yeah.
For the 145 is discussed.
>> Well, >> yeah. Okay. Here we go. Let's see here.
>> Yeah.
>> Look, based on testimony of a $5 cost for a 30-minute call and allocating two calls per week. That's not two calls to him. Maybe you are right. Two calls per week is the payment, but that's not two calls to him because she's only allowed to make one.
So, she they're giving her two week two calls a week like, "Hey, you can call somebody else."
>> Yeah.
>> Um but she's only allowed to call once, >> right?
>> Um Brian was open to it more, but unless parties agree. Yeah. So, the other thing is this [ __ ] Like, why are you writing it here? Like, you saying both parties agree he's got a ruling. We would have to get Brian's permission on this and it would have to be a change to like at least approach Brian first and say, "Hey, would you be openach?"
>> She's not paying to call Brian.
>> Well, I mean, you write a letter or something. I don't know. Whatever.
because she's pissed. Because none of this has anything to do with anything except for how corrupt and black robe disease and how she's a mother to her son regardless of whether or not she's, you know, >> um, >> I mean, you know, Sarah only concentrates on what's stupid >> and pointless and and mean and not going and going to be meaningless by not addressing the much bigger issue at hand that she's ignoring. Um, like, hey, arguing about phone calls won't really matter because correcting her address the proper way.
>> Yeah. Well, you're arguing about a car, but you are ignoring the fact that you're facing life in prison by turning down that deal. So, don't really focus on the car. Maybe focus on not being in life in prison.
>> Also, I kind of get the feeling that maybe they haven't visited her yet.
>> Yeah, I was going to say that as well.
Um, >> that's the other thing I wanted to talk about. Meowi big guy or meowie big guy $4.99 for the cheased wig and Suma's glorious low lightss also getting get Sarah idiot.
>> Thank you very much. Let's see.
>> 499 Melody Kate I made it to live late but happy to hear you making fun of Sarah. Oh obviously of course. Thank you very much.
>> J Saraphina $2. So Brian and son haven't visited her yet. Okay. Yeah, we'll get to that next >> feeling. No, >> Sarah sees her son as potential future income. Paul KNYC >> maybe.
>> Um, yeah. Well, I mean, >> if she's >> when he gets a job, >> she better get one. But I'm not sure if she's I mean, I'm sure she's on her mind, but she cares about the here and the now. Sarah's not >> You want mommy to have have some wings meals? And mommy >> bunny sango $5. What's with all the commentary? JK lol kissy face hard ice rose.
>> I left a comment on one of our me you and XD on one of our commentary, you know, Sarah videos or whatever it was saying like shut the hell up. I want to I want to hear the whatever it was. And someone else left a message for me being like there are plenty of other sites you can watch. Like >> yes.
I think she's kidding.
>> It's like, >> well, I don't know. People don't kn people don't read the name. Whenever I read a comment and >> person knew I was kid, yeah, I get it. I mean, I realize that it's not that big a deal. I I appreciated their comment because >> stick up for you.
>> People have figured out ex Derek's game.
They know they know ex. But mine is, you know, >> because he's pouring it on so thick that they're like, "Wait a minute. Is this another ex Derek comment?"
>> Oh, yeah. You mean his comments? Yeah.
Well, he gets outraged by all the wrong things. Also, >> Eminem and Emily, somebody get right without stuttering.
$2. Me and my life update. Washing my hair. Okay, thanks. Bye.
Thanks for the update.
Hairball yarn. $4.99. I'll bet Brian's credits for text messages have also dried up, so she can't even text him over uh >> yell at him over text since the court didn't entitle to any text messages.
Yeah.
>> And thank God for that. She wanted to be able to communicate with her son in every way available to her for the allotted for the largest aotted time.
>> Pigeon, telegram, [ __ ] >> Yeah.
>> Skywiding.
>> Skywriting. Hi. Hope you have a good day.
>> How many EYES DOES A BEE HAVE UP IN THE SKY?
>> YEAH.
>> SARAPHINA. J. SARAPHINA. $2. one call a week unless parties agree to two callers a week. Footnote. Well, it doesn't say anything about agreement of the calls.
It says she gets money for two calls.
>> Well, they agreed on one one a week. She gets money for Joe, I guess, just in case, >> right? But the judge is assuming that Sarah has a life and has somebody else to call, which she does.
>> I don't know about that.
>> Blackie Blackie La$1.99. My first Sarah Boon stream. Glad it's with you. Lol.
Lol. And for those of you who are new here and are mainly Caboon connoisseurs, check out the L check out Lauren Armstrong. I mean, it we're getting more and more people. It's getting better and better because we've got the casing now and we're going to be getting into the funny calls, but he is the big he's so much more enjoyable than listening to Sarah. Just listening to that idiot laugh and or cry.
She's just I I think also Sarah's real problem, although I don't think she knows this, is that I and this is my opinion, is that Judge Jackson knows, like I said, the kind of person she's dealing with here. And she I would imagine that Judge Jackson knows that theund the $70 or whatever it was that she allotted her for all the [ __ ] that Sarah claims isn't paid for is 145 toothpaste. I mean, they're not going to give people toothpaste.
>> I don't know. I' I've been reading some articles people have been putting on there cuz I'm just like, boohoo, you're in prison. Like, it's it's not good. I guess it's it is really like they don't give you anything. But >> I don't know. I feel like they I I mean, I don't know. I I I think I thought they give you toothpaste, but >> um >> so >> yeah, >> I mean, I don't care.
Uh, still thinking aation says where exactly does she think her leverage is coming from? The leverage is she will not stop. She will never stop just like Cy. It's worked for her up until relatively recently.
>> Uh, but wait, actually, that connection before we get into the visiting. Uh, I had the thought reading this that she's actually trying to do a completely different objective >> or she got another plan.
>> All this stuff she's pointing out, right? Oh, the the error in the address, the errors I mentioned before. She's trying to kind of set this up that somehow this motion was um it should be like appealed or like redone or it's it's uh you know not valid because of all the mistakes that are in it. I think that's kind of what she's doing here.
If I don't know, maybe playing a long game, but um she's highlighting every single thing. Look, you didn't tell me who pays for the call. You didn't tell me this. You didn't tell me that. When you really don't need to know all I mean, maybe the calls at most.
>> She was told about the calls. It says it right there >> in that footnote.
>> She's not connecting it with that. She's She's >> I know she's >> stupid.
>> Yeah, I don't think that's an error in the motion from the judge, but Okay. So, you you don't think they've uh visited?
Why? I think it's probably the same reason I have.
because they don't want to.
>> Well, no. Like directly in this motion, what what tells you that she hasn't?
>> Oh, the fact that she wants to know from when is it are they?
>> Well, it's what date >> confirm petitioner is an approved visitor, >> right? And and and at the end of this, I think she has the slip confirming >> what date >> this Yeah, it makes no sense because if he had visited, you would know he's an approved visitor. So, they've not visited. Um or maybe not.
>> She knows he's approve an approved visitor.
>> Well, I know that's the other thing. It doesn't make sense. I I also I think well it may at one point in that thing she says she wants to know when they're from when they're expected to visit like is the date like >> well she didn't say visit she says the payment she wants to know when that payment is coming >> visit and payment I think >> she says because in the order it says um where is it right here within 90 is a petitioner being identified as on automated visiting record with a current approved status.
Petitioner needs to make the first payment. So then she's like, "Well, yeah, he's been approved since September, >> so it should have been in by December.
When is he going to send that payment?"
She goes, "Is it 90 days from then?"
>> Talking about the visitation, not because of the visiting.
>> Yeah. Not because of the visiting.
>> Right. Right. How foolish of me.
>> She doesn't give a [ __ ] about them showing up.
>> No. Um a given.
>> Right. Um, >> I mean, why should she want to see her son? She only hasn't seen him in five, six years.
>> But point F, clarify where the respondent is permitted to have reasonable additional telephone communication with a child if bears the additional cost rate. Let's say assume she put her own name in there. But you, Sarah, you you are unable to decide what is reasonable. You are uh unhinged and that's the entire reason this happened because you are not reasonable.
>> That's right. This could have been done a long time ago, but you wouldn't go without child support which is psychotic.
>> You could have just shut up and kept getting money from Brian probably for the rest.
>> Absolutely. If she were half a decent person, none of this would be happening, >> right? Eminem and Emily $5. If DOC didn't give body soap, she would she couldn't she do a bird bath with hand soap and call it a day. Even gross single dudes use dish soap. Yeah. Like Lauren, >> I think that they do give an all-in-one body and hair.
>> Yeah.
>> Wash, which is why I think the judge mentions that specifically.
>> Well, because she mentioned it in her testing like No. Well, she said the way she described it was it's like one bottle that's your soap and your toothpaste.
She said that that's what they pay for.
>> Oh, gotcha.
Cuz it comes out. They get charged for everything in there.
>> She just doesn't like it.
>> Yeah. Um and she has nobody on the outside.
>> Water and some of the food that her body can't digest.
>> Um Libby says, "Hear me on. I'm confused. I thought the award of Brian's Alamo attorney fees and him being refunded the child support. I thought I thought she in effect got nothing." Well, no. She gets $3,992 which is covered by the $4,000 that Brian is getting back from child support. So there's nothing out of pocket now for Brian >> and but she >> doesn't get it all at once. She gets it over the next eight quarters which means it's going to be eaten up by her pay to stay expenses >> and her other expenses. I believe she's got some other expenses and all the money she owes probably other inmates would be my guess. And I think that is the reason why she's focusing on this alternative. I think she knows the problem she has of it being spread out because she wants >> the 600, right?
>> Yeah. The $600. Um she wants it sent.
Hey, can you can it have be sent like uh you know the other way it was originally like into her account so she could maybe this is separate from a different account. I don't know. Like it doesn't like these are all the details like why didn't you catch this on the first time Sarah cuz you >> or how about during the hearing? She had years before that hearing.
>> Yeah.
>> And plenty of help.
>> Um and what's the other thing I was thinking?
Um the information above is incorrect and in action respondent properly receives a court order payments in a timely manner. So um this is a tell because the court order payments in a timely manner. So she does know there's a payment schedule. So why is she confused on the 26 month? Like it was ve very easily broken down. Why didn't she say, "Oh, I got it." mind because she would never admit she was >> no >> wrong >> or that she understands anything ironically >> but Shinsz is here maybe Robin ADR pro is here as well >> yeah she's >> if she makes if she does a second call in the week that could be contempt of court right and she could lose her her access to even have the one call I assume um yeah I don't know should we listen to it again I guess Yeah.
>> All right.
>> Respondents amended motion for judicial clarification.
>> I guess comment more on this one. Like this. It is so repetitive. The first two paragraphs are literally just a repeat of the same thing with a little bit of extra language on it.
>> Yeah. and rehearing regarding you don't you're >> she doesn't mention the the really the main crux of her new thing is her address and how she going to get her money and the calls and who pays for most importantly who pays for the calls.
>> Well, her her titles of her emotions are so ridiculous. Like >> yeah, >> ma'am I don't even know this would even fit in like the title caption. Stop. You don't have to put your entire argument in the title. Can't you just number them like motion number one?
>> Well, just be like amended motion for judicial clarification.
That's it. That's it.
>> Alimony to be. She can't help herself.
That's why all of this is happening.
>> Mhm. Correction of payment information and telephone communication stated in the supplemental final judgment.
Comes now. Pro respondent Sarah Kun.
What is it? Was it a supplemental final judgment? I thought it was just a final judgment. Pursuant to Florida Oh, whatever. Florida rule of civil procedure 1.530 and respectfully files this amended motion for judicial clarification and/or reharing regarding alimony rears, correction of payment information, and telephone communication stated in the supplemental final judgment in support of this amended motion.
>> You she would have to ask for the hearing. She would have to set it up, right, based on a motion uh to be heard. Like, isn't that what she's supposed to do as well? She can't just throw these motions at the court and expect them to set a hearing themselves.
>> Well, she wants clarification or another hearing, a rehearing, which is never going to happen because all she doesn't realize that if there's a rehearing, she has to pay for that lawyer again, >> right? Well, she doesn't have a lawyer.
Oh, yeah. His lawyer, right?
>> Yeah.
>> She's going to owe him 16 grand by the time this is done.
No way.
>> Well, she's like, "Screw it. If I don't if I don't get if 4,000, I might as well be zero." I'd rather >> you're talking about somebody who's doing life without parole because she's that stupid and stubborn and, you know, like I mean, there's no telling how stupid she is.
>> Anger leads to >> what was it?
Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
>> Suffering leads to suffering.
>> Suffering leads to the dark side.
States. On April 7th, 2026, this court entered its supplemental final judgment in this matter after final hearing on August 25th, 2025. For some reason, I always thought it was the 27th.
And I think that's maybe just the day I flew back. So, I don't know.
>> No, the hearing was the 25th that I remember. The 27th was always stuck in my head. But >> on April 22nd, 2026, respondent timely filed her motion for clarification and or rehearing regarding inconsistencies in the court's findings concerning alimony aars 26 months.
See, this is where I think she's like trying to set up like some kind of appeal or uh a what is the term when it >> Yeah. A judgment is incorrect in error or something to be error in judgment.
>> Some kind of I know what you mean like whatever but yeah >> but whatever.
>> Uh some we need somebody up here who knows something.
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's true. We could use that.
>> Yeah. Lyn, exactly. She needs to file a notice of appeal, but I think she's doesn't understand you have to do the the you have to request a hearing. Like, don't you want to do any of that? She doesn't want to. She She wants to write her stupid [ __ ] and just let them know that this is unfair.
>> She's waiting for her money. And also, Brian doesn't do anything he's supposed to do.
>> Reconsideration there. That's what >> Yeah, >> reconsideration. But, um, >> it's not reconsideration that you're thinking of though.
>> I don't think appeal cuz the night was wrong.
Wait, what' you say? It's not what I'm thinking. What? I think you're thinking of a different term like >> Yeah. The reason the appeal is grained like an error like an error.
>> Yeah. Like an appealable er something but not that.
>> Yeah. Or the one with the why Leticia got an appeal versus >> Oh, hope says this is Sarah's version of an appeal >> notice notice.
>> You don't know what's coming.
>> Mhm. Respondent hereby amends and supplements her previously filed motion to include additional issues arising from the court's order regarding corrected payment deposit information and telephone communication between respondent and the minor child.
Four. In the supplemental final judgment, page 15, section E7, the court orders, all alimony payments, deposits shall be made by cashier check, money order, or certified bank draft made payable to correct pay and mailed with a deposit slip by the due date above to FOC inmate deposits.
>> Uh, I thought she got an extension on the dilo.
>> I don't know.
>> Yeah.
>> Blah blah blah blah blah. Five. The information above is incorrect and requires correction to ensure respondent properly receives the court-ordered payments in a timely manner.
Six, the correct payment information for money orders, cashier's checks, certified bank drafts needs to be made payable to Saraboon blah blah blah blah blah. The correct mailing address is Florida DOC inmate trust fund centerville station blah blah blah blah blah respondent request all right the air pros the time to appeal is 30 days it is jurisdictional and cannot be waved her appeal time is now run >> for this >> for this yeah the weather petition yeah I was talking about her criminal case I thought people said she missed her >> oh >> yeah she got an extension on that one I Yeah, >> may satisfy the court ordered payments electronically through the approved online system which provides expedited access to funds and proof of payment at www.correctpay.com/fl in the supplemental final judgment page 15 section E6A it states quote within 90 days of petitioner being identified on Sarah K.
Boon's automated visiting record with a current approved status pursuant to rule 33-601716 FAC. Petitioner shall make payment number one in the amount of $600 10. Petitioner has been an approved visitor since September 17, 2025. See exhibit 1 responded. So then why are you asking them to confirm that he's an approved visitor and your own exhibit shows he is? I I don't I don't get it.
>> Request clarification as to whether the 90-day period begins from the entry of the supplemental final judgement.
>> She's trying to get him in trouble.
>> Oh, gotcha.
>> The next letter is going to mention the bday.
>> Well, the judge when was the judgment when did the judgment come out?
>> End of beginning of April.
>> April 7th, I think.
>> Yeah. So, the payment is not due yet because I assume it's 90 days from the order.
Or else when as soon as she wrote that, he would be in trouble.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. Because she didn't pay it back in December.
>> She's trying to get him in trouble.
Obviously, >> uh Eminem and Emily $2. Also, what the heck is a certified bank? Uh isn't that like a wire? I don't know.
>> I don't know. Something people in prison get, I guess. I don't know.
of becoming a visitor as stated in the correct dollar amount for payment number one pending her original motion 11. In the supplemental final judgment page 13 section D1, it states, quote, beginning May 1st, 2026, mother shall be entitled to one one telephone call per week with minor child. End quote. 12. The court does not specify which party is responsible for the financial costs associated with the weekly call or any holidays referenced within the order.
13. Further, the order does not address whether additional telephone calls may occur if respondent is willing and able to pay all associated costs for such communication.
If respondent is willing, right? So, you're not she's not going on record that she's willing to pay to talk to her son.
>> You know, if I do it, can I make more calls? That's what that's what really makes me think very careful with her 13 cents.
>> Well, she wants to know that if she blows up after drinking some toilet hooch in jail or in prison and she goes, >> right, >> she's not going to get in trouble with the court that she already used her call that week. She doesn't want to do anything she shouldn't do.
>> Yeah. I don't want >> It's weird because she Go ahead.
>> Sitting in prison for life. She doesn't want to, you know, >> she doesn't want to get in trouble.
>> She always knows what to do and now she clearly doesn't know has no idea what to do.
>> Ever since we heard her say that she excels at everything and knows what's what and how many and what how what to do and how to do it. She has yet done known anything of what's what. doesn't know how to do anything and excels at absolutely nothing and has proven it time and time again. It's amazing.
>> It is amazing. She should um she could have written in here like, "Well, besides this, uh which is the rule besides your ruling." Um >> yeah, besides this, what was the cause of death?
>> Still trying to get wrap my mind around that whole thing.
>> 14. Therefore, necessary clarification is needed for determination of A.
Whether the petitioner is responsible for accepting the weekly and holiday calls at no expense to the respondent.
B whether additional telephone calls may occur upon agreement of the parties and or at respondent's expense.
15. For both parties to properly comply with the court's order, judicial clarification is needed to avoid future disputes regarding payment obligations and the respondents ability to maintain consistent communication with her minor child. 16. Respondent maintains and reasserts all arguments and requests for relief contained within the original motion for clarification and or rehearing filed on April 22nd, 2026, including the pending issues relating to alimony of rears. Wherefore, proay respondent Sarah K. Boon respectfully request this honorable court to a grant a rehearing and or provide clarification regarding the discrepancies in alimony arars identified in the original motion B enter on court >> well it's hard I forget I'm doing it and then then I all a sudden realize oh yeah I need to do it and then I can't stop doing it this record the correct payable to and mailing addresses for alimony payments to be made by petitioner to the respondent. C rent the online payment option for petitioner to make and this is such a cluster as well Sarah you you want update this to be the correct placement but then also give the option for this you can't have multiple options that's the whole thing with court just like when they take uh child support payments right you're not sending it to the other parent you're sending it to the state who sends it to the parent because the state wants to keep track of that is right they say no you need there's one this is where you need to send the payment so that When we ask you, you don't come in here like all these people are like, "Oh, no. I sent him a a Venmo. Oh, I sent cash app."
Right. That's the entire purpose of sending it here.
>> There's a reason. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Expedited payments as an alternative to mailing.
>> I'm like, who's mailing?
>> Confirmed. Petitioner is an approved visitor. clarify when first installment payment is due and the correct amount to be paid after respondents pending motion is addressed.
>> Your motion is bunk. The the math is on there of how much you owe and you didn't object when it was uh um >> but you know you're right. Your comparison of her being like other than this what's the cause of death? It doesn't matter what you tell her and she's not h hearing it. It's like everyone's saying she does what she wants. Like cute little final judgment that Jackson, but >> but like what's the deal?
>> My questions like let's get let's let's talk a little bit like let's get down to like what are you going to tell them?
Like what are you going to tell them?
>> Like this is your opening offer. All right. I would like to counter with >> right with everything I want >> and some nasty and try to get Brian a little trouble too. E clarifying which party is responsible for costs associated with the one one weekly call and holiday calls listed as ordered by the court.
I mean even this I would assume the person making the call is responsible for the payment of the call. Like Sarah come on. If clarify whether respondent is permitted to have reasonable additional telephone communication with her minor child if bears the associated costs. G. Amend the supplemental final judgment as necessary to reflect all court clarifications and findings. H Yeah. What's this blank paper right when she got it cuz it's too horrible for her to read. Like there's nothing on here.
Like it just blocks out of out of her brain.
>> No guys, I can't watch this.
>> Ohio pal mom member for four months.
Congratulations. Care 4JC YouTube member for 6 months. Welcome.
And remember, memberships are only a dollar. You get exclusive members only content. Remember to hit that like button. Create such further relief as this honorable court deems just improper. Respectfully submitted this 20th date of May, 2026.
Sarah K. Boon. Oh, Sarah. Sarah. Sarah.
Sarah. Sarah. And you got the the prison inmate. I mean, it's a scrub, but I figure that's better for a prisoner than just a black shirt.
>> Oh, yeah. I didn't even see this. How unattentive I am.
>> You just assumed it was Sarah, so why check it? Why look at her?
>> Petitioner has been an approved visitor since September 1720.
>> Five. The information above is incorrect and requires correction to re So I had this idea last night.
>> Mhm.
>> All right. So I was I was just thinking about um along the lines of you know uh the the debate over commentary and stuff, right?
um >> and trying to provide commentary and then you know I was like well I can't be I'm not going to be highbrow commentary because I'm like >> obviously >> you know I'm not I'm never going to produce a dreading type video right where it's all very well written and because I just don't have the patience right I would change it over and over it would never the problem is it would never get released it would never finish I would just keep updating it and double and doubting I don't like this as much but Um, then I was thinking, "Oh, I know what it was. The new alert that came out from YouTube saying that they were get doing new AI rules or like you're it's not no longer just like >> um is this AI altered content? Yes or no?"
>> Like there's going to be a second one of like does this because they they differentiated between like, okay, well, if you're making like a sci-fi type thing, obviously that's not going to be real. my narrator is what they >> Yeah, >> I Yeah, I Well, they didn't clarify that. I wish they would. Like >> I do too, but I thought I thought I assumed that's what they were kind of getting at, but who knows?
>> But like you can't really Why hit uh you know something that is sci-fi with an AI stamp because it's always going to be AI? It's never going to be real. It's computer generated. So then they were like, well, it's not you know, we don't really care about if there's, you know, small things here and there, right?
That's not AI. But they're going to start putting a stamp on stuff that has AI >> good >> generated video content. I really wish they would do the >> vocal part the narration. And also it would be nice if they would pay a little more attention when these AI channels put on other people's video in in totality.
>> So my thought last night was that well like when are these channels going to die out? I mean they're so bad. So then I was thinking, well, what if I just like did a second channel with like, you know, went really lowbrow and then the the best thing I could think of was something I don't know what came in my head, but remember what when Kathy Nester was walking around and I was making the sounds or >> I think about it.
>> So I was thinking of like what if I just did a channel called True Crime Farts or something and then I played scenes from Trials and just added in my own fart sound. So then like it would be like this with uh let me >> I just So there's a there's a there's like I don't know if it's Tik Tok or >> somebody already has it.
>> Well, not with True Crime, but it's somebody somebody has taken there's this girl who I don't remember her whatever channel or whatever it is, but she eats healthy food and dances. So like she'll go I'm trying to remember where I saw this. It it'll come to me in the morning. She and she goes to like the supermarket and shows you healthy food and dances and somebody else has taken all of her content and farted to the >> girl, you know. So, it's kind of >> like this.
>> It's funnier with this. Yeah.
>> Just wait now doing it live. Mhm.
Yeah, that's you know this would be wildly popular with me. I don't know.
What? What took you so long?
>> And then baby James, >> you start this started when the trunk your train of thought was to make a video of videos like the dreading.
>> No, I said I'm never going to make the dreading. So then AND AI THIS AI STUFF GETS VIEWS. So what I would why didn't I just do a channel that's all just true crime just farting just >> that's just true crime fart only discuss the defendant well maybe not only not when it comes to her Sarah would hate So, >> yeah. Uh, that that was my thought.
>> I'm 100% behind this.
>> And then I and then then I was thinking I was like, do I just start it and then eventually tell people, "Oh, yeah, I run true crime farts." Like, >> that's right. Like you're like a millionaire.
You know, >> I demonetized the channel. I'm like, h don't worry about it. Uh, >> I'm good. I never have to work again.
Anyway, >> 1999 Pamela Cich, thank you very much for the support. All right. Well, that is it for the show. Do you have anything else you would like to add or any I guess any other thing you were thinking?
You were you're doing a video on this >> that you're releasing. So, everyone >> like a half an hour, maybe less. I don't know.
Well, everyone make sure to sub to Suma as well as X Derek. She's tagged in the video. Um although I think something happens when because I know I tag you and then I think if you update the time, which I frequently do >> in StreamYard, I think >> Do I want no affiliation, so don't worry.
>> Well, that's too bad. Um I think once you update in StreamYard, I think it might >> Yeah. No. Okay. It It took it away. So, as soon as you update it in StreamYard, anything, it takes away the ads and not only the title, but the description. So, I'm not crazy. That's what is happening.
>> So, I'll have to update that again.
Again, again, uh probably going to be Lauren this weekend. Um I'm not sure about tomorrow night. Maybe, maybe not.
>> Okay. Um, we got the emails and a couple the emails are just it's it I want to do the emails again because it's so much like the chat log where he's going, "Hi, you want to move out?"
>> I don't know if I've ever seen the emails. They must be horrible.
>> And it's um Patrick Tecap reading it, so it's pretty good as well. Uh, and he's just doing rose rose rose rose rose kissy face kissy face. But uh Okay.
Well, thank you so much for being here, Suma.
>> Thank you. Hear me out.
>> Uh, everyone enjoy the rest.
>> Kiss your fingers. Yeah. Delete your archives. And we'll we'll end it with uh some very scary Dexter. All right.
>> Bye.
>> Bye.
>> [ __ ] I got six dead boy. I don't give a [ __ ] Especially when I'm lit [ __ ] [ __ ] to line you up. Boy, I don't chitchat when I click clack. I might ask what's up. Pull up in the pull up in the hooty then you give talking about rap where they stand.
You ain't spraying nothing. You ain't nothing. You ain't saying nothing. You ain't saying nothing till you do. Some out here putting that work in. And I'm cool like that cup I put my per in.
Ain't about the strap. You ain't about that knife. You ain't about that life.
You ain't about that that gangster. You ain't about that. When it's on, we at your knife. You ain't about that. You ain't about that life. That gangster about that.
Vidéos Similaires
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











