Tesla is effectively turning car manufacturing into a high-speed printing process, prioritizing production efficiency over long-term repairability. This "smartphone-style" approach marks a bold but risky shift toward treating vehicles as disposable hardware.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
2026 Elon Musk's Terafab GigaFactory UPDATE Shocked Entire The World!Added:
If Donald Trump really wants to control the world's oil, then Elon Musk is getting ready to burn through $119 billion just to take control of the world's AI future. And $119 billion is not a small number. It's so massive that if you stacked it all in cash, it could cover entire city blocks. But here's the crazy part. Elon Musk is prepared to spend that money to solve one single problem. Building a gigantic manufacturing complex dedicated entirely to producing chips. $119 billion for a chip factory. It sounds exaggerated, almost unbelievable, but according to documents released in Grimes County, that could end up being the final scale of Terrafab. And if that number becomes reality, this won't just be another factory. It will be Elon Musk's declaration of war against the entire existing semiconductor supply chain.
Because in the brutal AI race happening right now, whoever controls the chips controls the future. They lead the AI race and potentially dominate almost the entire tech industry. So, what exactly is going to happen inside Terraf? Why does it require such an insane amount of money? What you're about to hear might shock you. People may hate Elon Musk for his wild statements and over-the-top promises, but it's hard to deny his ability to build massive industrial operations from gigantic EV factories spread across multiple continents to lithium refineries, battery plants, energy storage facilities, the world's largest charging network, and now the Terraab chip manufacturing plant. Elon Musk first announced Terraab back in March, but the estimated cost of the project has exploded. What started at around $25 billion has now reportedly climbed to $119 billion through future expansion phases. Nearly half of that amount, about $55 billion, will go into the initial development stage, including a $3 billion research facility already under construction in Austin. $119 billion is bigger than the GDP of many small countries. It's worth more than countless long-established industrial corporations. But the most remarkable part is that Elon Musk may be willing to pour that entire financial empire into something most of us never even see directly. Semiconductor chips. Sounds strange, right? Because when people think of Tesla, they think of EVs. When they think of SpaceX, they think of rockets and Starship. But the deeper you look into Elon Musk's ecosystem, the more you realize that all of these businesses ultimately depend on the same foundation computing power. A modern Tesla is no longer just a car with an electric motor and a battery. It's basically a mobile AI machine. Every single second, the system has to process data from cameras, recognize vehicles, pedestrians, traffic signs, lane markings, predict traffic situations, and make decisions almost in real time.
When Tesla talks about robo taxi, what the company really means is putting millions of fully autonomous vehicles on real roads without human drivers. And to make that happen at scale, the demand for AI chips will grow exponentially.
But self-driving cars are only one part of the story. Optimus is even more terrifying. A humanoid robot doesn't just need to see the world around it. It has to understand objects, maintain balance, control dozens of mechanical joints at the same time, react to humans, and handle countless unpredictable situations thrown at it every day in the real world. That's why many experts believe mass market humanoid robots will require far more computing power than smartphones or laptops ever did in the past. And then there's SpaceX and XAI. At first, saying a company like SpaceX needs AI chips might sound a little ridiculous, but people often forget SpaceX isn't just rockets anymore. It also has Starlink.
With Starlink, Elon Musk reportedly wants to transform the network from a simple satellite internet system into something far more ambitious, a giant flying supercomput, basically a massive AI data center in orbit. Instead of sending raw data back to Earth for processing, which creates network latency, the satellites themselves would process and run AI inference directly in space. And to make that possible, SpaceX would need a special class of chips that Terapab could potentially supply. Then there's XAI, where things become even more extreme. Because modern AI training doesn't just require good software anymore. It requires an absurd amount of GPUs and computing infrastructure. So much that tech companies around the world are lining up just to secure chips from Nvidia, TSMC, and Samsung. That's why the entire AI industry is being bottlenecked by one critical problem.
There simply aren't enough chips. And when you put all these pieces together, Terapab suddenly makes a lot more sense.
This isn't just a chip factory. It looks more like an attempt to build the industrial brain behind Elon Musk's entire ecosystem. What's interesting is that Tesla has followed this strategy before. When battery supply became the biggest bottleneck for EVs, Tesla refused to stay dependent on outside suppliers forever. The company partnered with Panasonic, learned the manufacturing process, scaled aggressively, and eventually developed its own battery technologies like the 4680 cells. That strategy gave Tesla a major advantage over many traditional automakers in the EV race. But chips are far more difficult than batteries. An advanced semiconductor factory isn't just a giant building filled with machines. It requires incredibly complex clean rooms, EUV lithography systems that cost hundreds of millions of dollars per machine, elite level engineers, and process control at the atomic scale. Even the smallest mistake can turn an entire batch of wafers into worthless scrap. Even companies like Intel and Samsung have needed years to optimize production yields at their most advanced fabs. That's why many people see Terapab as one of the boldest gamles Elon Musk has ever pursued. What's especially interesting is that Terrafab doesn't seem to be described like a traditional semiconductor fab such as Intel or TSMC. Musk appears to be trying to build an industrial AI super ecosystem where chips, data, robots, self-driving vehicles, and AI training all exist inside almost the same physical loop. And that's what makes this project so unusual. In the traditional semiconductor model, chip design happens in one place. Wafers are manufactured somewhere else. AI models are trained in separate data centers and the final products are deployed in completely different environments. Every optimization cycle can take weeks or even months. But Terapab may be trying to compress that entire process into something close to real time. A new AI chip could be designed in the morning, fabricated as a test wafer inside the fab and then quickly installed into a real robotaxi or an Optimus robot near Giga Texas for live testing in real world environments. The data collected could immediately flow back into XAI's nearby training clusters to continue optimizing the models. If the chip runs too hot, consumes too much power, or processes camera data too slowly, Tesla could potentially adjust the design almost instantly instead of waiting months like in the traditional industrial cycle. And if that vision is real, then Terapab isn't just a chip factory. It's more like an AI evolution accelerator. And this is where things start becoming even more extreme. Elon Musk has mentioned that terraab could eventually target around 1 terowatt of computing capacity per year. That number is so absurdly large that many people initially assumed it had to be a mistake. To put it into perspective, the entire US power grid is often compared at roughly 0.5 terowatts of average operating electrical power. In other words, Musk is talking about a scale of computation so massive that if AI processing power is treated as the electricity of the digital age, Terraab could be aiming for something equivalent to roughly twice the scale commonly associated with the entire American power system in popular comparisons. If each AI chip runs at around 250 watts, then to reach the goal of 1 terowatt of compute, Terrafab might need to produce close to 4 billion chips a year. 4 billion chips is no longer the scale of a car company. That's the scale of a global industrial infrastructure. And to support that ambition, many analysts believe Terraab could eventually target around 100 million square ft of space.
That's roughly 10 times larger than the current Gigafactory, Texas, and far bigger than Apple Park at about 2.8 million square ft or Microsoft's Redmond campus at around 8 million square ft.
Based on statements related to Terraab, Musk believes the entire current AI chip manufacturing capacity on Earth may only be enough to meet about 2% of the future demand from the Tesla, SpaceX, and XAI ecosystem. If that's true, then the issue is no longer buying more chips.
The problem is that today's semiconductor industry may simply not be able to scale fast enough to keep up with Musk's AI ambitions. And that's why Intel becomes important in this story.
Tesla is incredibly good at building cars. SpaceX is incredibly good at rockets, but advanced semiconductor fabs are a completely different world. A 2nanometer fab is nothing like an automotive assembly line. It requires ultra advanced clean rooms, extreme ultraviolet lithography machines that cost hundreds of millions of dollars, atomic level material control, and extremely high yields to avoid burning through billions in capital investment.
Even a tiny defect can turn an entire batch of wafers into scrap. That's why Intel has something Musk can't simply buy with money or speed. decades of real world fab operating experience. At the center of Terapab strategy is the development of two flagship chip families representing the two biggest ambitions of the next era. The first is a lineup of advanced AI processors, the brains behind the autonomous ecosystem powering full self-driving robo taxi and the Optimus humanoid robot. According to Elon Musk's road map, the AI5 generation is expected to begin its early ramp up in 2026 before entering full-scale mass production in 2027. The rapid follow-up of AI6 and AI7 could then trigger a massive leap in performance, setting processing standards far beyond the limits of Tesla's current chips. At the same time, alongside the revolution happening on Earth, Terapab would also take on a mission in orbit with the D3 space-grade chip lineup. These chips would become the core of the Starlink network, where layers of silicon must survive some of the harshest conditions imaginable. Intense radiation, extreme temperature swings, and the brutal physical limits of cooling in space.
This split reflects two completely different technology philosophies. While Earth-based AI chips prioritize fast response times, adaptability, and safety in dynamic human environments, the D3 chips are designed around absolute durability, pushing AI computing power closer to the satellites themselves.
According to the current road map, Terrafab could start at around 100,000 wafers per month before eventually scaling toward 1 million wafers per month over the long term. To put that into perspective, 1 million wafers a month would approach roughly 70% of TSMC's current output by some common comparisons. That's the kind of scale that leads many people to believe Musk isn't just building a chip factory. He's trying to build the foundation for his own endto-end AI infrastructure. And if Terrafab really reaches that level, Tesla may no longer be viewed as just an electric car company. It could become one of the world's largest AI industrial powerhouses. Right now, the AI industry still operates through a highly fragmented chain. NVIDIA designs the GPUs. TSMC manufactures the wafers. Tech companies build the data centers. AI labs train the models. And only then do those models make their way into self-driving cars, robots, or real world products. Each improvement cycle can take months, sometimes even longer, because the hardware, software, real world data, and deployment environments all exist in separate ecosystems. But Terapab seems to be aiming to break that bottleneck. Imagine a few years from now, a fleet of Tesla robo taxis in Texas struggles with heavy fog, intense sunset glare, or some chaotic traffic pattern the system still can't handle smoothly enough. Data from those vehicles could instantly flow back into XAI's training clusters to improve the model. But what if the problem isn't just software? What if Tesla discovers the real bottleneck is in the chip architecture itself? camera inference performance, sensor data bandwidth, power consumption, response latency, or parallel processing capability in highly complex scenarios. In the traditional semiconductor model, making hardware changes can take multiple quarters because chip design, testing, wafer manufacturing, and real world deployment are all split across different companies. But if Terrafab is actually built the way Musk envisions it, Tesla could compress that cycle to a level never seen before. set real world data from vehicles and robots feeds directly into the AI training system. Lessons learned from the models loop back into chip design. Prototype wafers are produced faster and new chips are redeployed into robo taxis or Optimus for real world validation. In other words, Musk may be trying to turn AI hardware evolution into something that moves almost at software speed. And this is where the gap could become enormous because the future of AI may not be determined only by which company has the smartest model, but by which ecosystem can learn and evolve the fastest.
Tesla already did something similar with electric vehicles by transforming cars from mechanical products upgraded every few years into devices that continuously improve through software. And that's all that's going to happen with the Terraab project. What do you think about the Terraab project? Do you think it can succeed? Drop a comment below and we'll see you in the next episode. Are produced faster and new chips are redeployed into robo taxis or Optimus for real world validation. In other words, Musk may be trying to turn AI hardware evolution into something that moves almost at software speed. And this is where the gap could become enormous because the future of AI may not be determined only by which company has the smartest model, but by which ecosystem can learn and evolve the fastest.
Tesla already did something similar with electric vehicles by transforming cars from mechanical products upgraded every few years into devices that continuously improve through software. And that's all that's going to happen with the Terapab project. Whenever you have a new product uh with with a completely new supply chain, new everything, uh it's always a stretched out S-curve. So you should expect that initial production of Cyber Cap and Semi will be very slow. Elon Musk has pointed out Tesla's biggest bottleneck. However, the goal of producing 38,000 Cyber Cabs per week will remain nothing more than a number on paper without the 50,000 ton Gigapress. This machine not only allows Tesla to achieve smartphone style manufacturing speed for the Cyber Cab through a single piece casting process, but also hides many strategic reasons that have never been revealed about the real ambition behind this gigantic casting system. So, why is the 50,000 ton Giga Press considered a critical necessity? and the only weapon capable of helping Tesla dominate the robo taxi era at this moment. The first reason is tolerant stackup and this is not a minor detail. It is the hidden bottleneck that has defined car manufacturing for decades. In a traditional production line, a vehicle body is assembled from dozens of stamped metal parts, often 60 to 70 pieces just for a major structural section. Each part carries a small deviation, typically around 0.1 to 0.5 mm, individually. These numbers look insignificant but in reality they behave like a chain reaction. When 70 parts are welded together those tiny errors accumulate in one direction and by the end of the structure the total deviation can reach several millime. That is enough to cause visible misalignment. To understand how real this is imagine stacking 70 thin sheets of metal each slightly off by a fraction of a millimeter. At the beginning everything looks fine but by the end the entire line is shifted. In a car, that shift shows up as doors that don't close flush, uneven panel gaps, or glass that vibrates at highway speeds. These are not random defects. They are the direct result of accumulated tolerances.
Because of this, traditional factories are forced to include correction steps where workers or robots adjust and realign parts before final assembly.
This slows down production, increases cost, and introduces inconsistency between vehicles. This is exactly where Tesla takes a radically different approach. Instead of trying to manage 70 sources of error, Tesla removes them with the Gigapress, especially at the extreme scale of a 50,000 ton system, large sections of the car are cast as a single piece. There is no chain of parts anymore, so there is no accumulation of error. The geometry is defined once inside a mold under controlled pressure measured in tens of thousands of tons.
The result is a structure that comes out consistent every time without needing post-p production correction. This has a massive downstream effect. When the base structure is precise, everything else becomes easier and faster. Battery packs fit perfectly without forcing. Interior components align naturally. Suspension mounting points are exactly where they should be. Most importantly, Tesla eliminates the need for manual alignment, which is one of the slowest and least scalable steps in automotive production. In simple terms, the first reason is about removing hidden inefficiency. Instead of fixing errors after they happen, Tesla prevents them from existing at all. The second reason is structural battery integration. And this is where the Gigapress becomes not just useful, but essential. Tesla's goal is not just to build electric cars, but to redesign how a car is structured.
With 4680 battery technology, the battery is no longer just a component placed inside the vehicle. It becomes part of the vehicle's structure itself.
That means the car is no longer carrying the battery. The car is built around it.
To visualize this, think of a traditional car as a box carrying a heavy object inside. The box handles all the stress while the object is isolated.
Tesla is trying to turn that object into part of the box. But this only works if the outer structure is extremely rigid.
The front and rear sections must be strong enough to clamp the battery pack in place and distribute forces evenly during acceleration, braking, and cornering. If they are not rigid enough, all the stress will transfer into the battery which creates safety and durability risks. This is where traditional welded structures fail. When a structure is made from many pieces joined together, every weld becomes a weak point. Under torsional forces, stress does not flow smoothly. It concentrates around those joints. Over time, this leads to fatigue and reduced structural integrity. That is acceptable when the battery is isolated, but not when the battery itself becomes a loadbearing element. The Giga Press solves this by creating large singlepiece castings with no weld seams.
At the scale of a 50,000 ton press, Tesla can produce front and rear structures that behave like solid blocks rather than assembled frameworks. Forces can travel smoothly across the material, which significantly increases stiffness.
The battery pack can then sit between these rigid sections, forming a structural sandwich where the entire vehicle works as one unified system. The impact is immediate and measurable.
First, weight is reduced because there is no need for extra reinforcement structures. Second, stiffness increases, improving both safety and driving performance. Third, packaging efficiency improves, allowing Tesla to fit more battery cells or achieve longer range with the same number of cells. These are not theoretical benefits. They directly translate into better efficiency, lower cost, and higher performance. At the same time, this design simplifies production. Fewer parts mean fewer assembly steps and fewer failure points.
The battery integrates more cleanly into the manufacturing process, reducing complexity and speeding up production.
This is critical for scaling to millions of vehicles. When you look at both reasons together, the role of the Gigapress, especially at the 50 ton level, becomes clear. The first reason eliminates accumulated error and removes a major inefficiency in manufacturing.
The second enables a completely new vehicle architecture where the battery becomes a structural core combined. They show that this is not just a bigger machine. It is a tool that allows Elon Musk to fundamentally redesign both the product and the process of making it.
Why is every major automaker suddenly racing to secure Gigapress technology?
The Gigapress race is no longer just a trend. It has become a fight for survival. But the truth is automakers are not afraid of Tesla simply because its EVs sell well. They are afraid because Elon Musk has proven that traditional car manufacturing is gradually becoming obsolete. The Cybertruck pushed the limits even further with a roughly 9,000 ton casting system. But what is truly important is that Tesla is no longer the only company pursuing this direction. Now nearly the entire automotive industry is being pulled into a race to scale up diecasting machines. Hyundai Motor Company has developed its hypercasting program with around 9,200 ton systems for next generation EVs. Volvo Cars is deploying an 8,500 ton mega casting system for the EX60 at its Torsland plant in order to completely restructure EV manufacturing.
Ford Motor Company has also been testing a 6,100 ton press in Detroit since 2023 while facing enormous pressure on EV profitability after its Model E division lost more than $4 bill700 million in a single year. But the real shock came from Dongfang Motor Corporation. The company has started trial production using a massive 16,000 ton die casting machine. Currently the largest operational giga casting scale in the world. This number matters because it shows the industry is accelerating far faster than expected. Most automakers currently operate within the 6,000 to 9,000 ton range for structural underbody components. Dongfang has gone much further, aiming to cast enormous battery trays in a single shot. This proves that the race is no longer about who has giga casting, but rather who can produce the largest structures with the fewest parts. According to Giga Casting database tracking, systems ranging from 6,000 tons to more than 20,000 tons have already been ordered or are under development by OEMs and suppliers worldwide, including projects that were later cancelled because the costs became too extreme. That alone proves the entire industry understands one thing.
Affordable EVs in the future can no longer be produced efficiently using traditional assembly methods. The reason comes down to EV economics. Electric vehicles have far fewer mechanical parts than gasoline cars, meaning chassis and battery production costs now determine profitability.
A traditional structure with 70 to 100 separate parts does not just consume more steel, robots, and factory space.
It also increases production time and logistics complexity. Meanwhile, a giga casting system can replace that entire assembly with a single casting produced in just minutes. This dramatically reduces welding robots, electricity consumption, labor requirements, and even long-term factory maintenance costs. That is why automakers are investing billions of dollars into this technology despite the enormous upfront costs. A Gigapress production line is not just a giant machine. It also requires aluminum alloy furnaces, industrial cooling systems, massive molds, and entire factories redesigned around the process. But the truth is, automakers no longer have many options left. If they continue producing EVs using old manufacturing methods filled with thousands of parts and endless welding operations, they will struggle to compete on price against Tesla and especially against Chinese automakers.
What is even more alarming for Western car companies is that China now controls much of the global giga casting supply chain. IDRA, the world's leading Gigapress supplier, is owned by LK Machinery from China. This means Chinese automakers not only hold major advantages in batteries, but are also rapidly accelerating in next generation vehicle manufacturing technology. And this is exactly why Elon Musk continues aiming for even larger systems, including ambitions for future 50,000 ton Gigapress machines designed for robo taxi platforms and lowcost EVs. The goal is not simply to build cars faster.
Tesla wants to manufacture vehicles almost like smartphones, fewer parts, fewer assembly stages, fewer robots, and dramatically higher production output.
If that vision succeeds, the entire cost structure of the automotive industry could be rewritten. But the truth is this race has already grown far beyond Tesla with Dongfong reaching the 16,000 ton level and the industry beginning to explore systems above 20,000 tons.
Everything points to giga casting becoming the core foundation of next generation EV production. And in a market where profit margins are being squeezed harder every year, the company that masters manufacturing technology first may ultimately be the one that survives. Which next Tesla vehicle line could adopt Gigapress casting technology? Not only the Cyber Cab, but the Tesla Semi could also become the next vehicle to adopt massive scale Gigapress technology, potentially redefining the entire heavy truck manufacturing industry. Although Tesla has not officially revealed the full production process of the Tesla Semi, a growing number of clues from Gigafactory Nevada are beginning to confirm a highly disruptive direction. Drone footage has shown multiple enormous chassis sections positioned around staging areas. And what stands out is that these structures do not resemble traditional welded steel frames at all. Instead, their seamless surfaces, rounded reinforcement ribs, and highly complex geometry strongly suggest that they are high pressure diecast aluminum components. At the same time, Tesla's $3 bill600 million investment into expanding the Nevada factory, including extremely thick reinforced concrete foundations, indicates the company is preparing to operate Gigapress systems with clamping forces between 12,000 and 16,000 tons, far beyond the 9,000 ton systems previously used for the Cybertruck, specifically for heavy duty trucks. The core transformation lies in Tesla's shift from welded steel frame architecture to large singlepiece cast structures.
Technical analysis suggests that the front and rear sections of the semi chassis are unusually large and contain almost no visible weld points, signaling a transition from assembly to formation.
While conventional methods require welding together more than 800 separate parts with cumulative tolerances reaching several millime, Gigapress can create a single massive component with precision below 0.5 mm. This not only eliminates assembly inaccuracies entirely, but also removes weak points at weld joints, areas that commonly crack under the constant torsional stress endured by heavy trucks over millions of kilometers of operation. At the same time, Nevada's factory infrastructure also suggests Tesla is deploying a new generation of Gigapress machines, likely connected to Hydra Group's Neoer. However, instead of attempting to cast the entire multimeter long truck frame in one piece, which would be inefficient from a metallurgical standpoint, Tesla appears focused on producing critical structural nodes. These include high load areas such as suspension mounting points, electric motor attachment sections, and the regions surrounding the battery pack. This approach allows Tesla to optimize both durability and manufacturing efficiency while maintaining flexibility in vehicle design. Another crucial point is that Tesla has not simply copied the technology from its previous vehicles, but has significantly refined the materials themselves. The company is reportedly using a proprietary aluminum alloy that requires no post casting heat treatment, preventing warping while eliminating an additional manufacturing step. These castings act as the backbone of the entire system, integrating the drivetrain, suspension, and chassis into a single unified structure while removing thousands of parts from the supply chain. an advantage traditional automakers will struggle to match in the near future. More importantly, the entire structure is designed around Tesla's structural battery pack using 4680 battery cells. In this new architecture, the battery is no longer a separate component, but becomes a primary loadbearing element of the chassis itself. With significantly higher energy density, this system could allow the semi to achieve a driving range of around 800 km even under heavy loads. The cast sections produced by the Gigapress form an extremely rigid protective cage around the battery pack, increasing crash safety while simultaneously reducing overall vehicle weight, a rare combination of performance and durability. From an economic perspective, the benefits of this approach are extremely clear. In the freight industry, every kilogram removed from the vehicle can be directly converted into additional cargo capacity. Replacing steel with cast aluminum could reduce the Tesla Semi's curb weight by roughly 500 to 800 kg, enabling either greater payload capacity or lower energy consumption per trip.
This is particularly important for fleet operators such as PepsiCo and UPS, where operational and maintenance costs directly determine long-term profitability. All of these innovations stem from Elon Musk's core manufacturing philosophy, the machine that builds the machine. The Gigapress casting process begins by melting aluminum and injecting it into a vacuum mold under extremely high pressure within seconds. Once solidified, every component is scanned using X-ray inspection systems to ensure no microscopic defects exist. More importantly, Tesla is no longer producing vehicles through traditional linear assembly lines, but instead using its unboxed manufacturing strategy, independently producing large modules such as the front section, rear section, and battery floor before joining them together at the final stage. This approach dramatically reduces manufacturing costs and factory footprint while accelerating production scalability. As a result, production speed is pushed to an entirely new level. While traditional manufacturing can require hours to weld and inspect hundreds of joints, the Gigapress can create a massive structural component in just over a minute. This is precisely what gives Tesla the potential to fulfill large semi-orders at scale.
While competitors such as Volvo and Freightlininer remain constrained by older manufacturing systems based on stamped steel and welding.
Related Videos
U.S. Military Just Flexed The Most Dangerous Aircraft Ever Built The F-47
MaxAfterburnerusa
11K views•2026-05-29
Heating Staying On On The Hottest Day Of The Year
PlumbLikeTom
507 views•2026-05-29
발전 효율을 높이는 태양광 추적 시스템의 기술적 원리 #공학 #공정 #태양광 #알고리즘 #재생에너지
찐현장기술
2K views•2026-05-29
직관 및 곡관 배관 결합 고정 작업 #worker #process #fabrication #pipework #clamp
월드촌촌
2K views•2026-05-30
Wire To Wire Connection Trick | Strong And Secure Electrical Joint #shortvideo #wireworks
ElectricianTips-b1h
5K views•2026-06-02
Peterborough to Newark Northgate Driver's Eye View aboard an InterCity 225 - East Coast Main Line
TrainsTrainsTrains
822 views•2026-05-31
AI turbine design: hypersonic cooling leap #shorts #ai #hypersonic
bobbby_rn
671 views•2026-05-31
How Far Can A Tomahawk Missile Actually Travel?
WarCurious
13K views•2026-05-28











