💥WTF💥 Idaho 4: Proof Hippler is BENT ?! #idaho4

Added: 2026-05-30

[00:00:00]But, yeah, so let's head over to Kathy's Indie Zone.

[00:00:04]Kathy's Indie Zone had released a video saying their own private Idaho versus Coburg, and a few people had reached out via email and um basically said, "You need to check this video out." So, I'm going to check it out. Let's have a look at it together.

[00:00:21]Um if you're not subscribed to Kathy's channel, then I would certainly say get involved, head over there. Kathy has got many, many videos around the Idaho 4 case, and it's more about documentations, documents um of the case itself and on the peripheral and breaking things down.

[00:00:42]But, um fantastic channel. But, that's Kathy's Indie Zone. You can see it in the bottom left-hand corner. You've just got to um search Kathy's Indie Zone like I have done in the top here. And um and that will bring that up. But, let's have a listen to what Kathy's got to say.

[00:01:01]Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the Indie Zone. My name is Kathy.

[00:01:07]It is the day before Memorial Day. It's a very important day of remembrance dedicated to honoring American military So, the First Amendment's for freedom, religion, speech, press, assemble peacefully, and petition government.

[00:01:28]So, a very important day like um like Kathy says.

[00:01:33]>> military personnel who made the ultimate sacrifice protecting freedoms that we have. Memorial Day is thought to have originated at or about the time after the Civil War when the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was Hi, AR Hayes in the chat. I did see my friend. [snorts] I apologize. I I saw you and was meant to say hello and then I completely bloody forgot cuz I'm getting old, you see, mate. 46 now. I know I only look 21, but I'm 46. enacted and in that precious 14th Amendment exists the due process clause makes the First Amendment is So, due process requires three things: notice, an opportunity to be heard, and an impartial decision maker. And this is this thing here, isn't it? The impartial decision maker.

[00:02:35]It's quite important to kind of just consider the Idaho 4 case for a second.

[00:02:42]Consider the Idaho 4 case and and think, you know, an opportunity to be heard, an impartial decision maker, and notice.

[00:02:51]14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was enacted and in that precious 14th Amendment exists impartial [snorts] decision maker.

[00:03:00]How have we got to the point, especially in the United States, I think we're going down the same route as you guys.

[00:03:06]They're now talking about in the UK doing away with um juries and it's going to be a a judge that makes a decision.

[00:03:17]And I think to myself, you know, how can you have a a judicial system that actually goes completely against your your rules that are kind of supposedly set in stone.

[00:03:34]You know, an impartial decision maker doesn't come into a plea deal. This is this is leveraging, isn't it? This is like saying, "Well, we we can form a situation that makes you look guilty. Everyone will think you're guilty.

[00:03:51]And the best thing to do is just to say that you did it because if you don't then we're just going to make things worse for you. And if you admit to it then we'll make things a bit easier for you.

[00:04:03][ __ ] gross, mate. It is gross. It's a grotesque situation.

[00:04:10]Yeah, bad move um removing a jury. I completely I completely agree. Completely agree. It's not going to not going to end well that.

[00:04:20]But let's carry on.

[00:04:22]as the rest of the Bill of Rights applicable to the states where it had only been applicable to the federal government.

[00:04:35]>> [snorts] >> So this is Mr. Kohberger comes now pronouncing Kohberger by and through his attorneys of record and hereby respectfully submits the following motions to continue due to the substantial amount of trial investigation and pre-preparation were still outstanding as well as recent and forthcoming publicity that is highly prejudicial to the defense and any conviction and sentence resulting from a capital trial. That's obviously going to go on to say you know, we we are aware that there's a lot of stuff that's out there. It's very prejudicial. All of pretty much all of mainstream media were jumping on the Brian Kohberger's bandwagon that he's guilty, he did it.

[00:05:19]We also saw the Dateline NBC stuff that the [ __ ] constant hit pieces that were cropping up. And you know what I mean? It's it's Yeah, it's crazy, mate. It's crazy and this is what makes you laugh. This is showing, you know, Brian Kohberger was well aware >> [snorts] >> that they they just weren't ready. They just weren't ready for trial.

[00:05:44]And that's why you kind of sit back and when you hear all this stuff that's coming out with respect of the hair in Ethan Chapin's hand and all this stuff.

[00:05:55]>> [sighs and gasps] >> Why would somebody in this situation why would somebody in this situation enter into a plea deal? It did just it simply doesn't make sense.

[00:06:08]For someone who was supposedly quite smart and knew the system and you know, a PhD in criminology you would you would absolutely think that he would be able to look at his case and Anne Taylor would have if she'd have been doing her [ __ ] job, surely she would have been able to say to her client, "Look, we could go to trial and even if you get found guilty, we have got grounds to appeal. We've literally stood in front of the judge and told him we're not ready for trial.

[00:06:38]We're not we ain't ready.

[00:06:40]And we've told him and he's basically told us, "Well, that's your [ __ ] fault." You know what I mean? Well, that that's not Brian Kohberger's fault. And the trial should be Brian Kohberger's trial. And all of the people around him should be doing what they can to make sure that he is has a fair [ __ ] trial.

[00:07:01]So, regardless of how Hitler turns around and wants to frame the situation around Anne Taylor and by basically saying, "Well, you should just [ __ ] work harder." The point being well, if she if she didn't and he's he's basically saying, "Well, you should be ready, but she's not."

[00:07:18]So, that is right there ineffective [snorts] assistance counsel and because she hasn't done her [ __ ] job and the judge seemingly is supportive of that by saying, "Well, you haven't done what you should have done."

[00:07:34]But surely like Ken says there, surely the judge if the judge is non-biased and it a in adjudicative for the court in terms of fairness, then why wouldn't the judge raise the point that his legal team is failing him? So, he's not going to get a fair [ __ ] trial.

[00:07:56]It's it's it's it's bizarre to me.

[00:07:59]But, let's get back and see what else Kathy said and then we'll we'll conclude.

[00:08:05]A case that has been shrouded in secrecy.

[00:08:09]A high-profile criminal case.

[00:08:12]Idaho versus Coburger.

[00:08:15]During the time that this case was prosecuted, there were so many documents that [snorts] were under seal.

[00:08:23]Including the evidence that the state of Idaho had in this capital case.

[00:08:29]It says that this court has an obligation to uphold Mr. Coburger's constitutional rights by vacating the trial date because defense counsel needs additional time to review, discover, and prepare for the complex merits and sentencing phases unique to death penalty case. Mr. Coburger has myriad constitutional rights during these proceedings, all of which are dependent on counsel having the time and resources to prepare for basically what they need to do.

[00:08:57]Um in capital cases, the rights to effective assistance of counsel and a complete defense are amplified. Um Mr. Coburger is also entitled to an individualized sentencing determination, a constitutional right that is uniquely reserved for defendants facing the death penalty.

[00:09:12]The right to qualified expert assistance as part of the guarantees to effective assistance of counsel and an individualized sentencing proceeding.

[00:09:21]Counsel's professional and ethical obligations in a capital case.

[00:09:25]Um it says the counsel's duty to provide effective assistance of counsel in accordance with the prevailing professional norms.

[00:09:33]Hm. Exactly what their evidence was.

[00:09:37]That one person and one person alone was responsible for the catastrophic events that happened at 1122 King Road beyond a reasonable doubt in a DP case. When Mr. Kohberger pled guilty to the five very serious felonies that he had been charged with, the media coalition appeared in this case.

[00:10:04]Yeah, I know.

[00:10:05]Media files motion to unseal documents.

[00:10:08]They respond setting aside gag order.

[00:10:11]Might the media seeking to have documents unsealed be raised Judge Hippler media demands a media unsealing of documents.

[00:10:19]These are the videos what Cathy uploaded around that time. So these are videos you can actually go and check out and watch these.

[00:10:30]Seeking transparency filed two motions. One was to set aside the non-dissemination order that had been in effect since day four of the case, which Judge Hippler did order to be set aside granting the media's motion but he did not grant the media's motion to immediately unseal the case where our first amendment was cited to. Judge Hippler instead announced a process by which he would be looking at beginning with the end of the case and working backwards.

[00:11:07]Which is [ __ ] insane, isn't it? And I don't know whether you call it was Lana over on Truth and Transparency >> [sighs and gasps] >> that she'd got she'd she'd tried to approach him regarding some information and it it it worked out it was like two and a half thousand dollars something like that or two thousand six hundred dollars for some information.

[00:11:34]It's [ __ ] insane. They are holding the case behind a paywall. They are paywalling it.

[00:11:41]Like I appreciate and even in the UK, if you file a Freedom of Information Act request, then there is restrictions on how much can be charged. So say you went there and said, "I want this information."

[00:11:58]So what they'd look at is what information you want, how long the likelihood is of that that it's going to be what it's going to cost.

[00:12:09]And if it goes beyond the sort of an amount, then they'll come back to you and they should be able to help you on the best way to approach your request in order to negate some of that cost. And I think it's like works out like £25 an hour up to like £400, something like that. So they can't charge you more than about £400 for a bit of information based on the hourly rate. And if it again, if it goes beyond that, then they need to come back to you and say, "Look, what you're asking for is going to take this amount of time. So if you do this instead, it will kind of again negate some of that cost." But in this, it is absolutely [ __ ] insane that you've got a situation where the judicial process should be transparent. Should be transparent.

[00:13:08]But what they're doing is they're making it so some of the information they'll they'll hide because certain elements of it were done in certain jurisdictions, such as the autopsy reports for instance. The autopsies were done in Washington and because they were done in Washington, there is a non-disclosure clause, which means the public will never get to see it. Which it's very macabre to think that people want to get hold of the um autopsy information.

[00:13:43]But why people will want to get hold of the autopsy information ultimately is because this crime, when everyone was talking about it originally, it was almost like this was a shooting. And then it sort of turned into a into something completely different.

[00:14:00]So, there's elements to it that don't make sense. And we we've heard Kathy Mabbitt's talking about different things and you know, Steve Goncalves, the wounds don't match, that kind of situation as well. So, you will end up thinking, what the [ __ ] hell was actually going on here?

[00:14:18]>> [snorts] >> So, but we'll never get to see it because of where it was where it took place and the the the laws around it.

[00:14:28]Um well, there we go. Let's carry on.

[00:14:32]making decisions whether documents would be unsealed to the public, that process worked for a couple of months.

[00:14:41]And then came the third order concerning the unsealing of documents from the first quarter of 2025.

[00:14:52]He ordered December 18th, dozens upon dozens of documents to be unsealed. And with the exception of one document, none of the documents ordered to be unsealed December 18th have been unsealed.

[00:15:08]And there have been no further orders entered in the case concerning the unsealing of multiple documents for 2024 or for 2023 that still remain under seal.

[00:15:23]There [snorts] is So, when do you think that he claimed that he was going to be working backwards?

[00:15:29]We're still a a year down the trot.

[00:15:33]And there's still crazy like documents from 2024 and 2023 that have not been not been released.

[00:15:41]It's [snorts] crazy, isn't it? It's it's absolutely crazy.

[00:15:46]Also much confusion as to what the facts of the case are. For example, in the warrant affidavit that Detective Brett Payne signed on December 29th, 2022 under penalty of perjury requesting the warrant for Mr. Kohberger's arrest be entered which it was that same day.

[00:16:12]Look at that question as much. Okay, as such, did you participate in a search for the suspect? Yes, ma'am.

[00:16:20]And when was the first time you heard Brian Kohberger's name?

[00:16:26]Um the first time I heard Brian Kohberger's name was December 19th, 2022.

[00:16:33]And what was the result of that? Um was a result of investigative genetic genealogy that was being undertaken by the FBI. We had a phone call that evening and we were told Brian Kohberger's name. And before that, Mr. Kohberger was not on the radar. No, ma'am.

[00:16:51][ __ ] hell. One of the key questions that continue to be discussed is when Xana and Ethan arrive at 1122 King Road. According to Detective Payne, they arrived home at approximately 1:45 a.m.

[00:17:15]Yet in an order entered by Judge Hippler in 2025, he stated that Ethan and Xana were not home by 2:00 a.m.

[00:17:32]It's questions like this. And I haven't we also got their family.

[00:17:38]And I can't remember where this come from originally. I can't remember who said who said it originally.

[00:17:43]>> [snorts] >> But it said that they had got home at 12:00.

[00:17:48]Around 12:00 and had pizza.

[00:17:51]So do you when you compartmentalize this case, it's [snorts] >> [clears throat] >> the amount of inconsistencies from what is being told in the documents, what is being told in the media, the case is consistently changing.

[00:18:09]It is absolutely mental.

[00:18:15]How anybody around this case could sit there with a straight face and say yeah, everything's everything's fine.

[00:18:21]>> [snorts] >> What are you talking about? All you all you pro-burgers questioning things and making conspiracy theorists up out of nothing.

[00:18:30]People are [ __ ] loopy.

[00:18:32]That continue to be debated in the general community.

[00:18:39]Why did Judge Hippler stop the process of unsealing this case? And why is this case still so shrouded with secrecy nearly a year after the only person who the state of Idaho says was responsible for these crimes went to prison.

[00:18:58]If you have any thoughts, any opinions, any comments that you would like to share, please leave them here.

[00:19:04]And [snorts] that's Kathy's Indie Zone again. You can see in the left bottom left-hand corner there where my cursor is. Kathy's Indie Zone. Go and subscribe if you're not subscribed already.

[00:19:15]Um But look, it >> [snorts] >> She raises some some valid points and she did say like Cathy's not one for like opinions and things like that.

[00:19:26]She's generally like a a fact person, do you know what I mean?

[00:19:30]There's a dog that here's what it is.

[00:19:34]And uh uh Like >> [snorts] >> she's obviously had an opinion on it.

[00:19:39]She's got an opinion. And for someone who is very straight, matter-of-fact, document bosh, there you go, have that, to come forward herself and say, "Look, it's [ __ ] weird, mate. There's so many questions that don't sit right with people."

[00:19:56]>> [snorts] >> And and the story has changed.

[00:19:59]It's it's the [ __ ] bananas. It's like I done a video earlier, right?

[00:20:05]And >> [laughter] >> and it was about Bethany Bethany Funke and Dylan Mortensen. And we looked at Dylan Mortensen's interview in the aftermath of like this crime when law enforcement turns up at the house, right?

[00:20:20]>> [snorts] >> And Dylan Mortensen says that Kaylee Goncalves was downstairs, which at this point places Dylan Mortensen in her room, right? So Dylan Mortensen's in her room and she apparently hears Kaylee and I'm paraphrasing, but say, "I'm going to bed."

[00:20:41]And she goes upstairs with Murphy and then screams someone's hair and [ __ ] cuts it back down the stairs.

[00:20:53]And [snorts] then Dylan Mortensen says, "I heard her and I locked my door."

[00:20:58]So first of all, the question like people were raising in the community was well, [snorts] who the [ __ ] was she telling she was going to bed?

[00:21:07]Or was she [ __ ] talking to herself?

[00:21:08]Just randomly says, um, "I'm I'm going to bed." Do you know what I mean?