The number of photons emitted by a laser per second is calculated using the formula: Number of photons = Power × wavelength / (Planck's constant × speed of light). Since infrared light has longer wavelengths than visible light, it carries less energy per photon, meaning an infrared laser must emit more photons than a visible laser to achieve the same power output. For example, a 250 mW infrared laser emits 21% more photons than a 500 mW violet laser, demonstrating that infrared lasers are not the strongest in terms of photon emission despite potentially having high power ratings.
Inmersión profunda
Prerrequisito
- No hay datos disponibles.
Próximos pasos
- No hay datos disponibles.
Inmersión profunda
Insane Infrared LASERs! | Banned eBay seller's laser breaks my record | How many photons a second?Añadido:
Hi!
Time to get a little more crazy than usual for me.
I have an invisible, infrared laser that I am pretty sure will break a current record on my laser rainbow.
I will test how close its power and wavelength are to the eBay-listing.
And also explain why this high a power is extra impressive for an infrared laser.
Here's a brain teaser for you.
Which laser emits the most photons: A 500 mW violet laser or an infrared of half the power, 250 mW?
Let's find out!
When experimenting with a laser, wear safety glasses suitable for its wavelength and power output.
Especially when using invisible, infrared lasers.
And don't breathe any smoke.
Let me warm up with a laser that eBay recalled for safety reasons.
A first for me and a bit of a paradox since this should be the weakest of the infrared lasers I have bought on eBay.
How does this policy-violating laser perform?
Its wavelength is around 975 - 976 nm.
Great - close enough to the advertised 980 nm.
Its power is advertised as 1 mW and under 5 mW - naughty naughty.
But to the knowing there are indications in the listing of 30 mW.
Here's how strong it really is.
23 milliwatts.
I thought it would be a little more?
But then I realized something.
While the two batteries I put in the laser are not heavily used, they are not factory fresh either.
Second try - this time with brand new batteries.
OK - now it is 27 mW. Closer to 30.
A good example of how important fresh batteries can be for max power.
But all in all, I don't feel like 27 mW at 976 nm stands out enough to qualify for the laser rainbow.
Though for future experiments it is just nice to have an infrared laser that is not a fire hazard.
Next up is a laser I do expect to set a new record - at 808 nm near infrared.
The current recordholder outputs a respectable 178 mW.
However, you might have seen I have a 370 mW laser at around 808 nm: The hair removal laser!
Lots of info about lasers in that video - such as the little but important detail to know about in this warning.
But the laser beam from this one is highly divergent after a fixed focus spot and it can only be on for like 3.5 seconds at a time.
So again, I don't feel like the beauty blasting laser truly qualifies for the laser rainbow.
My strongest 808 nm laser is actually much, much stronger.
The pump diode in the Laserglow Hercules is a 2500 mW 808 nm laser diode made by nLight.
That one would stand out on the laser rainbow as the third strongest.
I just don't have access to its internal, infrared beam.
What I do have is this eBay laser.
Focused to a small spot, it burns electrical tape so fast that the video looks sped up.
But this is real time.
Surely, this will beat the current 178 mW record and even the hair frying laser.
Going by the listing, this laser is somewhere between 1 and 1000 mW.
Time for a reality check.
Its wavelength peaks at 803 nm.
That's fine - within a reasonable spec of +/- 5 nm for a direct diode laser without temperature control.
How powerful is it?
Hm. Max 614 mW - with a battery charged to 4.1V.
I have mixed feelings about that.
Second try for good measure.
This time with the laser power meter set to a manual range of 2W to avoid the annoying max bug in it.
Alright - 614 mW it is.
I was hoping for something closer to a full watt.
Maybe they had to dial it down in power to avoid overheating in this cheap laser host?
5 nm under nominal for a direct diode laser can be an indication of a cold-running, underpowered diode.
More on the subject in an earlier video of mine.
With that said, over 600 mW of laser light is always a lot.
I would like to see the invisible beam from it.
If I use my homebuilt beam dump to hide the bright laser spot and remove the infrared filter in my camera we might see the beam in midair.
Errh - not really.
Air does not scatter infrared well as explained earlier.
A trick for enhancing beam visibility on a low budget, I have used since I was young, is... Dust!
Still underwhelming for 600+ mW - if only I had some smoke.
Wait a minute... Yes, there it is.
An invisible beam made visible.
After a short, important message, I will show how this laser is strong enough to ignite metal.
And how you can calculate the enormous number of photons any laser emits.
A huge thank you to all my patrons!
Thank you so much for helping out.
It's really appreciated and important for a niche channel with monthly quality uploads like mine.
For just a dollar a month you can help me out too and get full access to all my posts on Patreon.com Link in the description, Thank you.
Burning black tape is a relatively easy task but igniting metal is not.
Yet, I believe this laser packs enough punch to ignite steel.
In the form of steel wool.
Here's a pound of it, but I will use less. Inside. On my dinner table.
First, a try with the beam focused to infinity.
No, metal is hard to ignite - with light.
Now, with the beam focused into a small, intense spot.
Beautiful - like a small firework.
I think I can go a bit bigger without burning down the table.
Aw, not a full burn and picky on spot size.
I wonder how it can be improved for a complete burn?
Looking at the fire tetrahedron missing fuel is not the issue.
Some of it was still left.
The chemical chain reaction is also available.
The burn continued by itself long after I removed the initiating heat source - the activation energy of the laser spot.
But heat could still be the issue.
A compressed lump of steel wool with a lot of strands touching each other can act as a heat sink.
Sucking heat - energy - out of the reaction fast by the decent thermal conductivity of low-carbon steel.
The oxidizer, oxygen in the air in this case, could also be the issue.
There might not be enough air or convection near the steel if the wool is too compressed.
Fluffed steel wool might be the solution.
Wow - that was more energetic and a full burn.
I need a bigger water bath.
I find it fascinating that nothing but light starts this sparkling metal burn.
Click like if you do too.
Obviously, a lot of photons on a small spot is needed for this.
How many photons does this laser actually emit?
The formula for calculating it is fairly straightforward.
The tricky bit is dividing by a very small number, Planck's constant, giving a very large result.
However, the Windows calculator can handle this just fine in one go - in its scientific mode.
The number of photons emitted by the 614 mW 803 nm laser is... Oh my.
2.5 quintillion photons per second.
That's 2.5 million million millions photons a second!
No wonder the light from this laser makes an impact.
From the formulas, we can also tell that a longer wavelength equals lower energy.
Infrared light carries less energy per photon than visible and ultraviolet light.
Brings us back to the intro question.
Which one emits the most photons?
The half-power infrared laser emits 21% more photons.
Making it the winner. Did you guess right?
This explains why the infrared lasers are not the strongest in my collection.
IR lasers have to emit more photons than the visible lasers just to match their power.
Until we meet again in the next video, I recommend watching the video on the infrared hair blaster.
Hope you enjoyed this video enough to click like and perhaps subscribe for more like it.
In any case, thanks for watching. Bye for now.
Videos Relacionados
Is dark matter real? - Why can't we find it? - physicist explains | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
LexClips
1K views•2026-05-30
Saptarshi Basu - Spectacular Voyage of Droplets: A Multiscale Journey to Extreme Flow Conditions
DAlembert-SU-CNRS
152 views•2026-06-02
A 6.0 Just Hit Hawaii — And It Came From The Wrong Place
TerraWatchHQ
115 views•2026-06-03
The Split-Second Mistake That Made Bouncing Bettys So Deadly
NoMansLandChannel
253 views•2026-06-02
Nobody Expected This Lava Reaction 🤯 #faits #facts
TendzDora
28K views•2026-05-30
The Difference In Charged And Neutral Particles
heavybrainspace
959 views•2026-05-29
The Silent Memory of Glass
UnchartedScienceworld
146 views•2026-05-30
A380 vs Every Vehicles Crash Test Challenge | Which One Win?
BeamLap
163 views•2026-05-29











