This analysis sharply deconstructs how fictional tropes are weaponized to build manipulative conspiracy theories under the guise of "hidden knowledge." It serves as a vital warning about the ease with which pseudoscience can be used to radicalize online audiences.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Hyperborean Knowledge: Why This YouTuber is Starting a CultAdded:
Fantasy is not real. You know that, right? The books you love, the books you read, they're fiction. They are not real. You know that, right? For most people, it's a pretty basic thing to figure out, right? That fantasy novels and short stories, comics, not real. But I found something strange. And before we proceed, I want to make sure we all agree on the same core baseline fact that fantasy is fantasy. We're on the same page, right? Because apparently not everyone else is. Also, some conflate fiction written by human authors for thousands of years of history. I wish I was making this [ __ ] up. Today's subject of interest is a channel known as Hyperoreian Knowledge. A channel of about 60,000 subs. It's essentially conspiracy brain rot. But what makes it interesting in my opinion is twofold.
For one, the name itself, Hyperorean.
I'll explain why in a bit. But the second thing that's more readily apparent when you take a look at it is the main focus. It tries to argue that fantasy fiction is evidence somehow of genetic memory of a past civilization that used to exist and at its height fell and in its fall has led to the degragation of modern society. I want to thank Lucy Hayes off the top for telling me about this channel. It it it's truly remarkable. It's something else. It put me on a rabbit hole that I'm still trying to work my way through even while writing this video. But it's important to distinguish right now. Does Hyperworian knowledge literally think that Conan the Barbarian is our history?
When Hyperworian knowledge claims in videos like the Dark Sun reset, our encoded genetic memory, he's not literally saying the world of Dungeons and Dragons Dark Sun setting is literally real, but rather that it's a reflection of real places that disappeared like Atlantis, Mew, and Hyperoreia. Again, Hyperoreia. Where have I I've heard that before somewhere?
A few of you might be asking what is dark sun if you're not say plugged into old school D and D settings. Well, Dark Sun is basically what if Dungeons and Dragons but Mad MAX >> created for Dungeons and Dragons second edition back in 1991. The postapocalyptic world of Athes is this desert planet. It's the product of magical spiraling out of control.
Sorcerer kings rule the desert with an iron fist and through their despotic rule. Only the most violent and brutal people reign supreme or survive. Again, it's Mad Max with elves. Like in Dune, water is extremely scarce and a form of currency. Metal is rare, which forces warriors to forge their armor and swords out of the bones and flesh of their enemies. Dark Sun feels more like Fallout than a typical fantasy setting.
It doesn't draw from pre-existing cultures like say Norse mythology. It's kind of its own thing with echoes of what came before. A lot of people believe fantasy draws from some form of history because it does. Writers consistently draw from history and folklore often does echo itself. Most cultures have a flood myth of some variety and these myths diverge further and further the farther and farther you get from the Middle East. You know, Noah's flood and the flood described in the Epic of Gilgamesh are remarkably similar in a lot of ways. Of course, there's a catch. A common sentiment I've seen online is that when discussing shows like The Witcher or Game of Thrones, people often argue that certain decisions don't make historical sense.
It's historically inaccurate, which I always found kind of funny because you do know these works of fiction, right?
There is no historical accuracy to the Seven Kingdoms because Seven Kingdoms don't exist. You see, fantasy might draw from history and might draw from folklore, but that doesn't mean that they're anchored in history. Just because A Song of Ice and Fire is inspired by the War of the Roses doesn't mean it's literally 14th century Britain, especially considering, you know, the White Walkers and all that. In fact, the wall arguably draws from older history with the Kelts, the big Roman wall that the Romans built to keep the Kelts out. The Witcher started as a pastiche of Polish fairy tales. Yes, but that does not mean it's literally medieval Poland. When interviewed by Publishers Weekly, for example, Andres Bagwaskki, the author of The Witcher, thoroughly dismissed the idea that he was anchored or tied in any way to writing an exclusively Polish story just because he drew from Polish folklore as a Polish author. The point of all this is to say that even when an author deliberately draws from pre-existing folklore mythology, you're going to run into some differences. It's just going to happen. This gets more absurd when you argue that fantasy draws from some genetic memory, a thing that we can't even prove exists. The concept and existence of genetic memory is tricky.
Is it real or is it simply a weird way we try to explain how babies and infants develop certain pattern recognition skills? The concept of genetic memory started when people observed that babies can figure out how to do math, how certain people can just figure out how to create music and create art. Where does that come from? While modern psychology acknowledges this is probably something to do with observation skills, how babies observe and learn from those around them, some scientists believe that babies have a transference of knowledge from mother to child. However, there has never been any successful test to prove this. It's more just spitballing. On top of all that, none of these theorists can actually determine how much is transferred through this theoretical concept. I don't really think that an abstract concept without any factual backing to it should be accepted as truth as the basis of a giant theory. But what are you going to do? Dn D lifts from everything. It lifts from multiple sources all with different writers with different intentions and what have you. Tolken's a big one obviously, but there's Michael Morcock's Elic Saga. There's Edgar Rice Burough's Barum stories. There's August Derelith's horror stories. Fritz Liieber's faf herd and grey mouser stories. But most relevant to our discussion is Robert E.
Howard's Conan stories set during the Hiboreian age, an era of antiquity prior to the existence of Mesopotamia, but after the sinking of Atlantis. Not Hyperoreia, by the way. Hiboreia.
There's a a reason to pointed out there.
That's a lot of preamble, but what about Hyperorean Knowledges video? Now, the video has a lot that's said, but I'm going to cut ahead a little bit because I think that's something that's worth discussing that kind of illustrates some of the mentality and approach that Hyperorean knowledge employs. Some of you recommended to me an amazing book about the NP theory, Neanderthal predation theory, and I thank you guys very much for that. It's a fascinating book. I don't agree with everything it says obviously, but there are many veins in that book that I 100% agree and overlap with what I'm talking about with these genetic collective memories of these times when we were competing with other humanoids in a massive struggle. The video recommends the book Them Plus Us, a book written by Danny Vendraini that focuses on the theory that Neanderls were these cannibalistic monstrous creatures covered in hair that hunted early homo sapiens for sport. He argues this almost drove humanity to near extinction. The book depicts Neandertols as these gigantic, hairy monsters and homo sapiens as docile, almost infantile creatures. defenseless, weak. This is of course different from everything we know about both Neandertols and Homo sapiens, who both were pretty strong, both were pretty intelligent, and neither were covered in hair, and neither were monstrous entities that were just focused on killing only. Of course, there is evidence of massacres, but that's true throughout all human history. And homo sapiens are docile people who grow more violent in response to their predatory hunters. And this predatory urge, this resistance to fight back, this desire to draw weapons inspires human violence this day.
According to this book, due to genetic memory, a pseudocience we can't really prove exists. Now, Hyperorean knowledge does not actually believe details of this book are real, but instead thinks that something did hunt us in the past.
Only instead of Neanderls, it's orcs, giants, and sorcerers. Well, they say it was Neanderthal predation, which I can kind of agree with and kind of see, but it was also orc predation. It was giant predation. It was sorcerer predation.
And that's what this created is a founder effect. Only the humans who could survive all those pressures live to reproduce. Those are the people that we descend from.
>> Yeah. No, no, not the real thing that you could make an argument maybe hunted us. No, it's it's the fantasy races.
They they hunted us. Before you laugh too much, I think it's important to note that this guy isn't the only person who looks at paleo history and thinks, "Yeah, this is just like my fantasy novels." of all of these animals on the screen have been found in the same rock layers as dinosaur bones and they're also alive today.
>> Some creatures have gone extinct and some haven't. That doesn't make dragons real.
>> Our culture today is fascinated by dragons. Franchise box office earnings for How to Train a Dragon is $2.2 billion.
>> Barbie is a billion dollar franchise.
It's not popular because Barbie's a real living doll living in a Barbie world.
>> There's a large number of pseudocientists, especially neocreationists, who look at dinosaur bones and argue that they're representative of dragons. No, really, this is a real thing they do. Rather than maybe assume that maybe myths of dragons are inspired by discoveries of dinosaur bones, the opposite is true.
Dinosaurs prove dragons are real, not dragons prove dinosaurs were real.
>> Hundreds of dragon legends from around the world and all throughout recorded history. Legends are rooted in reality.
>> Are legends all rooted in reality? Mind you, these are the kind of people that believe the great flood, the global great flood was real and that Noah's ark was real and they have to rewrite evolutionary theory to make that so. And that the earth is like 6,000 years old.
all of those things being disproved by a whole variety of different sciences. So I am not principally because you know I haven't studied this but I'm not principally against the notion that a dragon in you know some ancient text does not really come from or is not really a reference to a big lizard.
>> I guess he thinks neanderal bones were orc bones and giant bones were I don't know mammoth pieces. I don't know. You know, this book talk about it actually makes you think about the time machine by HD Wells as the Eloy, these peaceful surface dwellers and the morlocks, these violent people who live under the ground. And what's interesting was at the time HD Wells made this kind of these two parallel human races as an allegory for the discussion of class divide, how the poor were kept building the underground while the rich sat above on top, useless, the poor developing strength, going stronger. And Wells argued that eventually if we kept doing this, the two directions of humanity, the two classes would divide even further, becoming separate species of humanity entirely, but that the underground people who deem as poor today would be better equipped at survival and domination because they just made stronger. You could make the argument Wells was dealing with some classist uh belief systems, but again, it's in it's a it's a thought experiment. It's not meant to be taken literally. In this sense, Benjamin's book is used kind of as an anchor point so that Hyperworian kind of can anchor his more wild ideas to some scientific theory. That basis is what he uses to justify well, you know what? I'll just let him tell you in his own words. The fall of Hyperoreia, the sinking of Atlantis, the end of Moo. Throughout our history, we have these remembrances of cataclysms, in our genetic memory, and it pops up over and over again in our myths, in our legends. And there's no other setting that really demonstrates this than the dark sun. The dark sun is a representation of what the world was like post Atlantis after the sinking of Atlantis because of the sorcerers who were abusing magic because of their hubris because of their greed because of their desire for power and to dominate others. This led to a great cataclysm of the Atlantean civilization. So, the dark sun is a reflection of what the world was like after the sinking of Atlantis.
Atlantis, he argues, sank because of dark powers being exploited by sorcerers. And this does kind of track with what Plato originally said about Atlantis. I I I don't think you all know the origins of Atlantis. Now, for those unaware, Atlantis first appeared in the entirety of human literature in Plato's dialogues. specifically Trimeus and Critius. And by the way, presumably there was a third dialogue that would have concluded the story of Atlantis, but it's either lost or never was written. Now, when people talk about Atlantis, they usually discuss the events of Trimeus, which outlines the cosmic rise and fall of Atlantis, as well as the cosmology behind how Atlantis exists, the elements, the humors, all that. Less analyzed is Critius, and I think it's worth discussing. See, Critius outlines the war between Atlantis and Athens, the city state. which by the way was originally founded in 1,400 BC by the Mcansans. If this war happened, it would have taken place after 1,400 BC, which means it would have been a war in the Mediterranean around the same time Egypt was around. So why didn't the Egyptians write about it? There are arguments that some records of Atlantis existed in other documents, but there's no proof those ever existed. The most noteworthy example is the philosopher Crantor who was a student of one of Plato's students who claimed he went to Egypt and discovered a document arguing Atlantis existed. However, the document where Crantor supposedly says this is lost and there's no evidence that any of the documents he supposedly saw ever existed, which makes everything about this extremely dubious other than the fact that Crantor existed and did believe in Atlantis allegedly. But also the other big hole in this whole story is that if Atlantis and Athens fought in a war that would have taken 9,000 years prior to the dialogue because the dialogue implies Atlantis existed 9,000 years ago which is roughly 8,000 years prior to the founding of Athens. More likely as Aristotle pointed out Atlantis was an allegory meant to talk about hubris. Now it is interesting I think that the mans did experience a great fall essentially along with the manowans but Athens survived albeit with some significant economic decline but it became an independent city state on its own and a figure of great political power in its day at his word based on the history we know Atlantis and mya should have been contemporaries but they simply weren't because Atlantis say it with me now doesn't [ __ ] exist. It's a minor little side note in Plato's stories and it only rose to prominence in our culture today because of the Renaissance era writers like Francis Bacon and Thomas Moore. Hell, Plato doesn't even pretend Atlantis was all that great a nation. They lost to [ __ ] Athens. The same Athenians who got beaten by Sicily just a couple years before that whole dialogue was written.
I mean Aristotle Plato's student called Atlantis [ __ ] because it is [ __ ] Plato often talked about high ideals and concepts and these dreams whereas Aristotle was saying hey here's the world as I see it. Here's the world as it is and I don't see no [ __ ] Atlantis. All right. However, there is a kind of Atlantis though it's not a lost civilization but rather lost land mass where people did live.
In 1931, a fisherman named Pilgrim Lockwood was sailing 40 km off the eastern coast of England when he noticed a strange object in the nets that his crew had been dragging across the seafloor. It was a harpoon carved from the antler of a deer measuring over 20 cm long with a sharp barbed edge.
Lockwood's discovery confirmed that this area of the North Sea, which for years had been hypothesized to be a lost submerged land, was once a place that ancient people had called home. And other discoveries since then have revealed that those people weren't just homo sapiens. At various points in deep time, Neandertols and maybe even older human relatives roamed this long-lost world. And for a pretty good reason, too. This area, which connected Britain to the rest of Europe, was once one of the continent's richest hunting grounds.
A dynamic and at times lush environment that supported a wealth of species and natural resources. To ancient humans, it was something of an ecological paradise.
Doggerland is a region of northern Europe that was smothered by water once the ice caps melted after the end of the ice age. This landmass bridged England to the rest of mainland Europe. We found pottery and crude tools there. Not traces of an ancient civilization like Atlantis, but people did live there like cavemen. Yet, Hyperorean argues that Atlantis exists and indeed all these other lost civilizations, including Hyperoreia, exist, and it's due to our genetic memory, one that lives through stories and lives through fantasy, that we can prove it. According to him, except when you keep listening, you realize how [ __ ] crazy this whole thing is. This led to a great cataclysm of the Atlantean civilization. Now survivors went on to other parts of the world and part of this was that they went to Mesopotamia especially the Tyrion region and the corrupt ones became sorcerer kings. This ties in with the dark sun and the cleansing wars. We talked about the goblins and the orcs being exterminated. that completely overlaps with what happened in the dark sun setting because it is mirroring our genetic memory, our collective unconscious of this timeline. So this guy says Atlanteanss went to Mesopotamia and they became dark lords over there.
um how these people conquered Mesopotamia by the way which was not a singular civilization but actually several different nations including Sumer, Babylon, Assyria and Akad is anyone's guess. Also, uh I couldn't help but notice you said they settled in the Tyrion region.
>> They went to Mesopotamia, especially the Tyrion region.
>> Um where where where is the Tyrion Legion exactly? And again, there were pre-existing colonies in that area, especially I'm talking about Ty because the main city that this takes place in in in the DND setting is Tier, which is obviously Ty and these Mesopotamian city states all across this region with the sorcerer king rulers. This is where a lot of all this stuff starts. This is where this is really where we need to be looking.
>> You mean Ty Jordan, which is on the opposite side of the Middle East of Mesopotamia? This guy is saying conquerors like Sargon of Akad was really an Atlantean wizard. Yeah, cuz Sargon of Akad was the big conqueror in that region. Does that mean he's the great sorcerer king who's a snake guy? I don't [ __ ] know. But that's the best we get apparently. And by the way, this is assuming that this guy when he hears the word Sargon of Akad thinks the actual Sargon of AOD, not Call Benjamin.
But I digress.
>> The new face of UKIP, the party partly responsible for Brexit, now resorting to online extremists to get attention.
>> And I'm not going to be apologizing for my crimes against political correctness.
I hate political correctness.
>> Foreshadowing is a literary device.
So we look at this setting and we see scarcity. We see strife. We see people dominating each other for the meager resources that people have available to them. It's a post abundance world and and human beings were thrown into absolute just scarcity at all levels. And this remembrance of these savage times when we were being corrupted by these sorcerer kings pops up in other motifs and other myths and other fictional settings like Conan the Barbarian. He also argues that Mesopotamia was this world of scarcity which no it [ __ ] wasn't.
>> Inhabited for nearly 12,000 years.
Mesopotamia's stable climate, rich soil, and steady supply of fresh water made it ideal for agriculture to develop and thrive.
>> It wasn't Arachus. The fertile crescent was called the fertile crescent because it was intersection of the Tigers and Euphrates rivers, places that flooded regularly and thus helped immensely with irrigation. Even in the Bible, they even refer to Babylon as a place of excess, not a place of scarcity.
>> Because a lot of it had to do with weather magic and manipulation.
That's why the dark sun setting hits home so hard is because the weather was manipulated and it was corrupted and you know it was a massive heating event and that's what led to it being such a desert-like symptom. What the [ __ ] are you talking about? You think the wizards made the the Euphrates flood an event that still happens this day? Well, no.
It's because of [ __ ] rain, you [ __ ] I mean, let's be perfectly blunt here. This also is not even getting into the whole fact that, you know, the Middle East has a lot of major elements. Like, your [ __ ] numbers come from the Middle East. It's not like witchcraft. It's basic science because people in the Middle East were just as intelligent as everywhere else. But again, I digress. To me, this give me the idea of like how ancient aliens when they point to like a eur of non-European culture, they go, "Oh, this advanced structure, a pyramid, how could it have possibly existed? How could people have the sense to build a triangular structure? It must be aliens. Aliens must have taught them that instead of the shocking idea that Europe is not the singular bastion of knowledge and that white people do not travel from place to place to spread civilization there, which I think is the implication here, the Atlanteanss from Europe because Atlantis is a European nation apparently came to Mesopotamia to conquer it and guide them to become a power. It's a perfect mirror of this dark sun setting.
You have these citystates ruled by sorcerer snake kings throughout the land and people vying for power against each other. Slavery is abundant.
Strife, conflict, thirst is everywhere.
And these snake sorcerers have convinced a great many of people to renounce their old ancestral ways and to become pacifists.
They tricked the population. Hibborian knowledge's essential argument is that European inspired high culture was brought down by dark magic and those with the dark magic went to a place they associate with being bad, the Middle East, Mesopotamia, a culture that gods chosen in the Bible had military conflicts with. The ultimate accomplishment of Nebuchadnezzar was the opening of the fiery furnace.
Nebuchadnezzar had gone to Jerusalem, looted and leveled the temple of Solomon, and he brought the wise men of the temple back to Babylon with him.
What happened in the story is absolutely amazing.
These three wise men enter this fiery furnace.
Not only did they come back out in perfect condition, they weren't alone.
They came back with an extraterrestrial visitor in tow. In today's terms, we would obviously call this a Stargate or a portal. Now, I'm not going to force you to watch the entirety of this video.
He goes on to argue that literal snake sorcerers, yes, literal snake sorcerers, all represented with James L. Jones's rendition of Thulsa Doom from Conan the Barbarian conquered all of the Middle East. By the way, Thulsa Doom the character is not even a character from the original Conan the Barbarian stories by Robert E. Howard, but actually was a figure Howard made for the Cole of Atlantis stories, which itself would later adapted into Cole starring Kevin Sorbbo. This has no bearing what I'm talking about, but I just think it's neat. Actually, you know what? It actually makes sense that Tulsa was used here because they're talking about Atlantean snake sorcerers. Maybe he's on to something. Point is though, he argues that literal serpent people are leaders of the world and are trying to take us back into the old ways and something mirroring what modern neon-nostics believe that this world is fallen. The only way to escape is to renounce it.
That is the ultimate snake sorcerer trick to convince the population that you live in a fallen realm. So why try anyway while they accumulate might and magic and rule over you? It's the ultimate spell. And these spellcasters again, they are in themselves powerful beings. They are probably Atlantean bloodline, but they're the corrupt version. And they use these spells and and certain religions and certain spiritual paths can be a spell used to control your mind by these sorcerer kings.
>> How many conspiracies is that right now?
We got Atlantis, lizard people, evil conspiracies meant to control us, to pacify us, a forgotten civilization of ancient power, what's not to love? We got the Avengers of conspiracy theories going on right now. All using popular fantasy tropes as the funnel to draw in the crowd. It's something familiar so you recognize it and you don't question things too much. You don't have to follow the logic. It's not some advanced information here. It's stuff you already have in your [ __ ] library, including mine, I might want to add. You're probably thinking, "Who buys into this horseshit?" Well, judging by the comments, a lot of [ __ ] people buy into this [ __ ] Like, when you can smell the rain. So true and relatable.
I've been studying Cataclysm since basically the moment I found out about it years ago. It's like a spiritual compulsion to seek out more and more knowledge from those eras.
>> What connects more with this whole Hyperorean theme is when I was a kid, I had nightmares with the black sun.
It could not be just coincidental.
How the [ __ ] would I know? This symbol produces fear to me even today.
Insane power. Once a esoteric teacher told me the process of solar initiation was to be penetrated and consequently pald by the sun. Not just the sun, but the one that shines in the night.
Ever look at the sun the same way?
>> I studied Ada Goisha from the lesser key of Solomon for years. Ritual summoning magic definitely coercive in many ways.
corrupted morals being the most noticeable.
Know, oh prince, THAT BETWEEN THE YEARS WHEN THE OCEANS drank Atlantis and the gleaming cities and the years of the rise OF THE SUN OF ARAS, there was an age undreamed of when shining kingdoms lay spread across the world like blue mantles beneath the stars.
while you WERE STILL LEARNING HOW TO SPELL YOUR NAME. BUT ULTIMATELY, what's this guy getting at here? He's saying what happened then will happen again.
Here's him saying it right now.
Actually, only the humans who could survive all those pressures live to reproduce. Those are the people that we descend from, the ancestors of the heroic age. And we still have that bloodline in us. you still have that ability to survive the modern iterations of the orcs, the goblins, the giants, and the sorcerers, especially the sorcerers. We are being selected against by sorcerer predation in our modern time. And I think we can feel it. We can feel that we're on the brink of another Atlantean fall because we are being ruled by sorcerers who are are abusing their magical powers like they did in the past. Same with the fall of Hyperoreia, by the way. Same with the fall of Mew. Now, like all effective cults, there needs to be some hidden truth here, right? Being hidden from you that spells doom. And only we have the answers. This isn't just him rebuilding a new version of history for you. It's a warning. And he hearkens back to all these other mythological societies to create the continuity of older civilizations, a rise and fall, including Hyperoreia.
>> It It's a story that goes back as far as time. That's why we see with Atlantis and Hyperoreia. Lamaria again is kind of like a prototy setting as well. And it from its inception, I believe, was ruled by sorcerer kings, but that's a tale for a different day.
But I think that's why today we have this impulse and this fixation on post-apocalyptic settings, post-apocalyptic feelings. And because we have gone through this again and we collectively recognize the sign, that's why there's a lot of zombie fixation. That's why there's a lot of Fallout type scenarios.
Fallout again is basically a futuristic setting of the dark sun.
>> So the fixation on post-apocalypses isn't just because we are naturally fearing the end times of what we have, but it's because we're having psychic recollections of some fallen civilization. But you're probably wondering like zombies, didn't George Romero draw from the problems of his day, of Vietnam, of consumerism, of intense obsession with military structure? Why yes, those are reasons why George Romero made his zombie movies in the first place. Those were on Romero's mind. We actually finished Night of the Living Dead here in Pittsburgh. Threw it in the trunk of the car. Literally threw it in the trunk of a car and drove to New York with it to see if anybody would want to show it that night when while Russer and I were driving to New York. We heard that on the news on the car radio that Martin Luther King had been show.
>> These don't disprove the theory though.
In fact, Hyperworian knowledge says those are extra things. That by having conscientious ideas of the moment filtering through the genetic memory, it's actually proof that the cycle is continuing. We grew up in a very zombie time.
And you can see that maybe it's a social commentary, but I think there's also some another layer to it, too. And just because I say that there's one thing that I feel something is connected to does not necessarily negate the other layers that other people point out that I've noticed you guys have pointed out before too. And in fact that adds on to what we're talking about here. So please let me know what you think about this dark sun, this genetic memory, the the resets.
>> He's using your counterargument as proof he's right. Even though none of it makes any [ __ ] sense. You can really boil down everything Hyperorean says into one simple sentence. Everything that we have builds upon what came before. Ultimately speaking, our current society builds upon the legends and beliefs of what came before. If you look at what he's saying from a from a distant perspective, there is some truth to what he says. History repeats itself. But the problem is just because you touch on something that can be some universal truth doesn't mean the specifics are actually what's happening because what he's saying is [ __ ] crazy. And that is part of the problem with the golden age. People become it's too pleasant.
It's too abundant. And you don't have any spiritual growth anymore. You don't have any lessons learned. You of course become arrogant. There's a reason why the elves are always depicted as being arrogant.
Why are elves always seem to have this sense of superiority, arrogance about them? It's because they live in a bubble.
They're extremely powerful, extremely beautiful. They don't age. That does something to your soul and your psyche.
Whereas men, we have more grit for our ourselves. We go through a lot more. We learn a lot more. And we live way more deeply. We have so much more depth than the elves do. And that's why a lot of us come into this realm as men. So, let's break this down here. Elves are weak because they're ignorant to the dangers of the world. While the people who come to Hyperoreian knowledge are men. They roleplay as men because they understand the hardships of life. You aren't like those wimps who can't handle what's coming. You're not like the Aloy passively waiting for the Morlocks to come at night. You're men. You're strong. You're powerful. And accepting your vulnerability as a man without the power of the sorcerer king, that sets you apart for success. You will carve your weapons from the bones of your adversaries and fight to take what's yours to protect your society to protect your women. That's the mechanics of a cult. Don't you want devoted followers who leave their families for you, give their money to you, give their bodies to you, give up their lives for you, consider you God, and will kill for you?
Don't you want to become a cult leader?
Since the death of God, there's been a vacancy open. You could fill that void.
Here's how.
>> Michael D. Langan is an American counseling psychologist whose focus is on cult and psychological manipulation.
After decades of studying the behaviors of cults, he created a checklist of 15 traits that are common among his subjects of study. And while not every cult embodies every trait, they embody several of them. And these traits include an excessive zealousness and unquestioning commitment to their leader and belief system where questioning is discouraged, even punished. The leader goes into excessive detail about what members should think, how they should act, what they should feel, what activities they can do. And the group has an elitist, almost exalted status for those who are a part of it, especially their leader. The leader who controls order through a polarized view of the world. It's us versus them. Them being treated as almost some inhuman monster like say a serpent sorcerer king. the personification of a bad guy from a fantasy novel. And while there might be some concerning things done and said and all that, it's all worth it for that hidden knowledge or the goal of the cult. But often leadership will shame or guilt its members to influence their behavior through public rituals or something subtler. You may have to cut ties with your old world and family with the things that brought you joy, but also you're expected to draw in new members, hand out pamphlets, keep sharing the videos. At certain point, you might only be expected to interact with people from the group, shunning all those outside except those vulnerable to recruitment because if you don't shun, you might hear a conflicting opinion. So far, based on this singular video, we've seen a few of those traits already. Even in the comment section, we have a centralized figure who espouses knowledge. We have commentators who have completely drank the Kool-Aid, so to speak, on this. The authorities of the world are evil monsters. What they say is a lie meant to control you. There's hidden occult knowledge that you need to learn about and it's going to reshape your world view. Absolutely. And you cannot interact with those monsters because they're trying to control you.
They're the Atlantanss. They are the Morlocks. And you don't want to be an Aloy, an elf, a weakling. But perhaps we need more evidence of this, that it's a cult. I mean, come on. We only got one video here. There's like a bunch of videos here. What's the proof this is an actual cult? Well, let's keep digging.
For some people out there, you might be stunned to hear this channel even has an audience. It sounds kind of nuts. But here is a difficult pill to swallow.
This channel is only going to appeal to a certain kind of person. That being nerds, socially isolated fantasy nerds, presumably male, and presumably cishat.
These are people who identify heavily with their identity as a gamer, as a TTRPG player, as a fan of books, and their hobbies are being invaded, as they perceive it, by mainstream media. In other words, the normies are coming.
Aragorn is a Europeanl looking white man with shaggy brown hair and hard eyes. In no way, shape or form can someone read that description and come to the conclusion that Aragorn is a black man.
But of course, in order to appease the almighty ESG score, Magic the Gathering has decided to change Aragorn into a black man. This change is simply being done for one very obvious reason, which is to appeal to woke identity politics in order to seem more inclusive and to raise their ESG score as always. I can't help but compare that invasion to one outlined by Hyperorean Knowledges videos. An invasion of dangerous outsiders masquerading as people.
>> Where are you going to go? Where are you going to run? Where are you going to hide?
Nowhere. cuz there's no one like you left.
>> Almost as if orcs and giants don't really mean orcs and giants, but the average person. But that would require coded language in dog whistles, wouldn't it?
>> Hitler uses his fantasies to inspire his followers. But for Schmidt, it is not fantasy. For him, it is real.
>> Foreshadowing is a literary device. And >> your hobby isn't just a fun thing to do.
It's a key to a conspiracy. And these elites, these sorcerers, these normies are coming in to change that with secret knowledge, to make it modern, to make it a tool to control you, make it woke, that they're going to hide the key to this greater knowledge through this veneer of wokeness, and to raise their ESG score as always. This idea of taking the familiar and morphing it into some type of mystery, some conspiracy, that's not a new tactic. In fact, fiction's been doing this for years. And fiction has in some cases influenced how we perceive reality. And it's through the understanding this that we can understand Hyperorean knowledge's entire appeal to his either very gullible or very coded audience. When Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code came out, a ton of otherwise educated people were convinced by the seemingly logical arguments that didn't seem too outlandish.
>> Now listen to this. It's from the gospel according to Philillip. It was rejected at the council of Nika along with any other gospels that made Jesus appear human and not divine.
>> The church was supposed to be carried on by a woman.
>> The Catholic Church had hidden knowledge that could undo its hold in society.
That doesn't seems too odd, doesn't it?
The Catholic Church hides a lot.
>> The companion of the Savior is Mary Magdalene.
>> In those days, the word companion literally meant spouse. When the legend speaks of the chalice that held the blood of Christ, it speaks in fact of the female womb that carried Jesus's royal bloodline.
>> The idea that Jesus had a child with Mary Magdalene and that that bloodline had been protected over the centuries.
Okay, that doesn't seem too weird. In theory, it sounds almost reasonable. But the thing is all evidence that provided this conclusion in the books were wrong.
Facicious. A seemingly logical argument with logical evidence that really had no real evidence. Around the same time, there was a movie that came out called National Treasure. And this one argued that the founding fathers and the Freemasons had collected a secret treasure that was just sitting somewhere in America and that the clues were hidden everywhere from shipwrecks to the Declaration of Independence itself, right down to the dollar bill in your pocket. And if you found the clues and you figured what they meant, you could solve this great mystery and find the treasure.
>> I'm going to steal the Declaration of Independence.
>> Much like Count Da Vinci Code, if you just know about history, you can find the child of Jesus. Now, in both works, the same plot happened. The thing that the main characters found interesting, whether it's history or religion, is the secret key to some great treasure, be it a physical treasure or knowledge. In the book Ready Player 1, it's also the conflict there. Knowing pop culture from the8s could help you find the ticket to Willy Wonka's chocolate factory essentially and you get the ownership of the company. But of all these works, they are obviously works of fiction. I think National Treasure is the one that I think is the best because it has the lowest stakes. You're not uncovering a centuries old conspiracy or getting a company. It's a big treasure chest essentially. And be honest, you can kind of see Ben Franklin doing that kind of crap, right? You can see him ringing his hands together and going, "Yes, yes, read my my clues I'm laying out to find my treasure." But the rest are innocent, fun enough, right? What I'm saying is Hyperorean knowledge wants to think he's a Dan Brown protagonist. He wants to think he's finding the clues to history secrets seemingly. But you see, the thing with Da Vinci Code, National Treasure and Ready Player 1 didn't lie to their audiences so much. Da Vinci Code does. Da Vinci Code lies about how many panels of glass they are in that pyramid outside the Louv. The entirety of the Priary of Scion, the main organization that's supposed to be keeping this secret. It's all [ __ ] It's not ancient society at all. It's a famous hoax. Actually, claims Sonier was connected with a secret society called the Priaryy of Cion. supposedly founded by crusader knights to protect the bloodline of the meravenians, a dynasty of so-called sorcerer kings who ruled France in the sixth and the seventh centuries.
As evidence, the authors refer to documents called the dossier secretre or secret files they had found in the national archives in Paris. These suggested that priaryy of sign was indeed an ancient order whose former grandmasters included Leonardo da Vinci and the files open the doors to even more sensational claims.
The author suggested that Sonier knew of a devastating secret that Christ survived the crucifixion and that the meravenians were directly descended from a child born to Christ and his closest follower Mary Magdalene. Crucial to the arguments were coded parchments relating to the priaryy of san which they said Sonia had found hidden in an ancient pillar that used to support the altar in his church.
A staggering claim but is it true.
There's absolutely no proof that Sonier found any parchments inside this hole and it is very hard to see how they could fit into such a tiny space. In fact, both the parchments and the documents founded in National Archives in Paris, the Dece Pierre Plontar, who died in 2000. He claimed Meavvenian ancestry and to be the rightful king of France. In reality, he was a fantasist who produced convincing but bogus documents and he founded the Priary of 1956.
But Dan Brown also knows you don't know actual [ __ ] about history. For him, the facts get in the way of telling a good story. And you know what? The facts do get in the way of telling a good story.
It's more fun to think you're finding hidden knowledge from a writer who you believe maybe knows something and maybe use that knowledge to write a good story in the process. But I what I want to know is this. Does Hyperorean knowledge know what he's saying is [ __ ] or has he bought into an older, far more insidious cult that has reshaped both the 19th and 20th century in the process? That's right. This isn't just a video about debunking some kook online.
It's about exposing how this has tied in to one of the most dangerous secret societies in the last century and a half. Hyperorean knowledge. I looked at his videos. I looked at his original videos. You see, some are actually hidden as members only. But he seemingly started off as a media analysis channel, as a cultural channel. It was until he started talking memory being unlocked that you kind of got into weirder stuff, like say talking to DMT machine elves.
Machine elves are a term used to refer to these hallucinations you get from doing psychedelics. And these elves who often communicate the secret mathematics of society, the nature of reality itself. Apparently, Habborian knowledge thought, "Yeah, I'm going to take psychedelics and talk to machine fairies and find out the secrets of life. Maybe he actually believes the [ __ ] he's saying because he's on drugs." Honestly, that would explain a lot, but I think it goes deeper than that. He focuses a lot on secret knowledge and specifically is obsessed with Conan the Barbarian, all while discussing how our modern society is brainwashed. His most famous video is titled How Millennials Were Brainwashed.
It has almost half a million views.
That's not a small amount. The video frames the discussion as one analyzing why other generations view millennials as something to despise. So, in this video, I will be discussing some of the conditioning and programming that went into the millennial generation. Now, when I mean millennial, I mean the general understanding of what that age group is. And essentially it's people born within the early8s to the mid90s. Now there is some debate as to the exact date but let's just keep it at that.
So what is it about us millennials that brings out the worst and so many other generations when discussing us? Well, let's go back a bit.
Let's kind of look at how we have been programmed. how we have been conditioned.
>> Keep in mind this is coming out after half a decade of articles blaming millennials for destroying everything.
Restaurants, breakfasts, the economy, everything. But Hyporeian knowledge immediately shows a montage of popular songs. Of the songs shown, almost all of them are by women with Eminem being the only exception. And Eminem very famously took a style of music that was created by black artists, that being rap and R&B. Interesting. So, are women the problem or are non-white cultures the problem if influences white culture? You see, that's a possible interpretation, maybe an uncharitable one. But as we go on, you'll realize I'm not being all that uncharitable here. Now, I can remember as young as grade 4 going to these dances at this hall owned by the Knights of Columbus.
Now, these dances were from grade 4 to 6, and we were basically at this bar simulation. It's the best way I could describe it. It was a bar simulation.
We would all go in there as young as 9, 10.
There was a a bar, but it served Coca-Cola and soft drinks. And in the front of the hall, there was a little dance club where they were playing rap music about smoking crack and grinding on each other.
Little John was a was a popular song at the time.
And we were these kids being pushed by society, our parents, our culture into engaging in a barl like scenario at the age of nine. Now, I grew up in a small town in North America, small city, I guess, but I've talked to other people and this is was like a common occurrence.
And I'm not talking about some like innocent Mickey Mouse type dance. I don't have a problem with that, but I think grade six is still a bit too young for that. But anyway, >> so what's the problem with millennials dancing? And he says this all while an emblem of the Knights of Columbus is on screen. I think this is an editing error, which we'll get to in a bit. But he argues that school dances are basically like going to a bar, playing popular rap music from the era. Yes, because parents offering kids juice at a school dance is evil. And rap music is evil, too, apparently. And brainwashing people. And apparently the adults forced rap music on the kids rather than rap music existing as a protest or a response to mainstream Hawai.
I guess I find it odd how the only rapper he shows again is Eminem. It's only a problem when it comes from inside the house for him anyway. But he ultimately blames boomers until he mentions the Knights of Columbus.
Remember that that weird logo? I think he meant to put it around here somewhere. Now, the mainstream paints it as like these people who are against abortion and contraception and they're like hyperconervative, but these dances were being hosted at one of their facilities. I was letting 9-year-olds listen to Little John and rap and grinding on each other. And it was just >> the Knights of Columbus are an extremely conservative Catholic order, but Hyperorean knowledge claims they force kids to listen to rap music. Apparently, more likely they're clueless adults who just played pop music for their kids and didn't know what the [ __ ] they were doing. What's interesting is how he frames going to school dances as MK Ultraesque. Like, buddy, you got served juice by Catholic dad. That's far from the worst things Columbus did to millennial boys. Right. But already he is conflating basic [ __ ] with conspiracy theories. The Knights of Columbus, it's basically the Freemasons, even though it's like a basically not.
It's a pretty open order. Some churches, some some clueless parents playing rap music at a school dance. It's based the same as a government- sanctioned plot that bombarded poor racial minorities or clueless college students with drugs to just see what happened, to see if they could brainwash or influence them using chemical influences. They're basically the same thing, so why not compare the two? A lot of conflation here. A lot of paranoia. That idea that he is looking at the intentionality of everything around him as messaging goes even further when he tries to argue that movies brainwash kids. Specifically, he is mad at coming of age romcoms.
>> I'm not perverted. I get good grades. I go to church. I'm a cheerleader.
>> Which themselves were an offshoot of films like Animal House, which existed back in the 70s and are not distinctly unique to millennials. More of a Gen X thing. There was this genre of movies that was very very particular to our generation which I basically deem as these coming of age romcoms.
And basically the crux of these movies was trying to get um the the mission of your of your transition into manhood essentially because most of them were from a male perspective was to lose your virginity in some manner. Look at this nice campus.
Reminds me of all those great college traditions like homecoming.
>> We've got shakes for sale >> getting wasted.
experimenting.
>> Touch my chest.
>> Meeting new people.
>> Now touch her.
>> Making homemade sex tapes in your dorm room.
>> That was the goal.
>> Again, sexualized music and sexualized comedies. That's the danger here apparently. And he's arguing this was done deliberately to control us as opposed to rejections of the status quo that came before. Animal House was controversial upon release because it broke from the more sanitized comedies of the previous decades. It's not intentional. It's art piercing through the veil of conformity. But here it's a tool used to control and influence. And I remember at a very young age, 14, 15, 16, that people were being shamed on a massive scale from not uh engaging for not engaging in this type of lifestyle. And I'm not coming at this from a Christian perspective saying that this is the Antichrist system or anything like that.
I'm just coming at this from my own personal perspective and just trying to explain to the other generations why we are so messed up. But the intention Hyperorean knowledge has is to explain why his generation, which is my generation, is so messed up. And it operates from the belief that millennials are messed up.
that we need to defend ourselves from people's scrutiny, which no, not at all. I don't know who I need to tell this to, but boomers making fun of you is not your fault. Gen Z making fun of you is not your fault. The reality is millennials were promised a dream version of America that we could be a part of if we just followed the guidelines set out for us by boomers.
The only problem is that these same boomers who were in charge then rigged the housing market to explode with the housing crisis and you know other financial decisions that put us in a bad position. This is of course after 9/11 happened and a subsequent forever war in the Middle East that was less about 911 and more about collecting oil. Nothing really changes it seems. Our generation was radicalized by horror and then exploited by businesses to improve their bottom dollar all while lying to us to control us. Let me tell you this. What do you think had a bigger impact on my life? Going to a school dance that served cold pizza and warm soda while Backstreet Boys played? Or watching my classroom empty out one day in September because my classmates heard their dad was crushed under tons of rubble in a senseless invasion?
Did Britney Spears screw me up? Or was it the black cloud hovering over I80s horizon where two massive towers used to be? Was it American pie or America's pointless wars that radicalized generation? You tell me. Frankly, I don't think I need to apologize for why I am the way I am or why anyone else should apologize for that, much less throw my fellow millennials under the bus to do so because I feel insecure by other people posting online about it.
Case in point, you Hyperoreian. This video to me revealed exactly why Hyperorean knowledge was the way he was.
He's an insecure man who desperately wants to be seen as an intellectual, as a man of knowledge, of culture, to be respected, but as someone who only knows how to analyze things through the limited lens available to him. He's overstepping his bounds.
Okay. So yeah, bar simulations at 9:10 and then we had these romcoms from Hollywood basically telling us that we have to in order to be a man, we have to have sex with a lot of women from a male perspective. Now, there's a whole other female programming as well that we'll get into, but the preset identities that were being pushed on millennials by the mainstream would be one of the main ones would be the frat boy party boy archetype. Now, this is the guy who will chug beers and chug and do keg stands and partake in that whole scene, you know. Um, his goal is to get drunk. His goal is to get laid. He's not focusing on his body.
He's not focusing on his mind. He's not focusing on his spirit. It's just pure hedonism at a a very, very young age.
>> Right here, he demonstrates his knowledge is limited. Right here, he shows a list of millennial movies that were supposed to present the concept of the party guy, or essentially the character John Belalushi played back in Animal House in 1978. But rather than shows as an evolution of pop culture trends, he argues it's brainwashing meant to control you. But there's just one problem. You see, I've seen these movies. At the end of this list, the far end, we see Rob Schneider's The Hot Chick. That's a movie about Rob Schneider body swapping with a high school girl that is decidedly not about a fat boy. In fact, almost none of the characters in the movie are male. Even famously transphobic actor Rob Schneider is in fact not playing a man for the majority of the film. He is in fact playing a woman in a man's body. Kind of ironic, I think.
>> It's me, Jessica.
I'm in here. Which tells me that Hyperorean knowledge, for all of his knowledge, didn't actually watch these movies. He has no clue what the [ __ ] he's talking about. If I can point out an obvious flaw in his argument, how can I trust anything else he has to say? It feels like the kind of conversation someone might stumble into a college with a guy who thinks they're deep after three pot brownies, and you're just trying to get to class while they don't shut the [ __ ] up, and you know the topic better than they do, but you also realize that explaining how they're wrong would take too long. It prolonged the conversation, you desperately want to end, and you got [ __ ] to do. And you also know what I'm talking about because I'm getting flashbacks to that watching this video. But ultimately the summation is that millennials were corrupted by transgressive media, especially media centered on the feelings of women or a musical genre started by black people that were forced into good wholesome towns by the liberal Knights of Columbus. Seems really stupid when you lay it out like that, doesn't it? It should be noted that Hyperorean knowledge is not a fan of Christianity, though Christian ethics seem to inform a great deal of his perspectives. He talks about runes and Odinism, but he does it through the lens of Catholicism, through Christian belief. Specifically, his focus on dancing and partying is a very clearly Christian conservative concern.
The Norse did not have such concerns about drinking and partying, considering it was part of the revalries of Valhalla and the gods. A true Odinist wouldn't really care if kids are being encouraged to party or the fact there's a bar simulator. That's kind of a big deal with the gods. They love to drink and they love to party. Why would someone who worships the North's gods be upset by that? He may divorce himself from the Christian specifics, but the moral ethics have anchored themselves so deeply in his thought process, he can't untwain himself from that. Then again, Christianity did impact our perspective of Norse mythology, too. So maybe he's on to something there. But he loves his historic esoteric texts. Which leads me to putting my conspiracy hat on for a second. See, one common thread in a lot of conspiracy theories is that some other culture has been influencing mankind from the shadows. If you ever watch Ancient Aliens, everything is aliens. Every non-white civilization, all their achievements were only accomplished because aliens came and helped them out. These brown people couldn't figure out for themselves how to build a pyramid and put blocks together. No, no, it's got to be aliens.
You know, >> the Great Pyramid was built the level of technological sophistication far in excess of anything that we have today.
When you consider the vast amount of information about the earth that's encoded into the Great Pyramid, you can't just dismiss all of this as pure coincidence. But when white people have an accomplishment, that's them. But they were in contact with aliens or they were using it to contact aliens or they were talking to aliens as equals, not worshiping them like gods like those brown people do. Funny how that always happens in ancient aliens, right? When it's Europe, it's a contact. When it's Africa, it's a servitude situation. It's a worshshiping situation. When it's Asia, forget it. Very famously, the crystal skulls were supposed to be alien skulls in South America. But the crystal skulls were all fake. They weren't real.
They were fabricated. And when you look at them under a microscope, you can tell they were all crafted by human hands.
But conspiracy theorists use it as proof that aliens did in fact touch down. To this day, they still use it as proof.
Even though they are all clearly fake, yet they still believe in a conspiracy theory. Why is that? Perhaps because it centers Europe as a bastion of knowledge and the other cultures as behind them, needing the assistance of some extraterrestrial force to bring them into the century alongside Europe. But it's not just aliens, is it? You know, there's that lizard people conspiracy that all the elites in the world are secretly lizard people in human skins.
And that sounds an awful lot like Hyperworian knowledges Wild Takes about snake sorcerers, doesn't it? Because this belief in some ancient monstrous race controlling everything is actually old they might realize. It was common belief in the 18th and 19th centuries for example that Native Americans didn't actually have a civilization. Rather it was believed that a white society first came to America only to be eradicated by some invasive species. It was this conspiracy that Andrew Jackson cited to justify the Trails of Tears. On December 6th, 1830, Andrew Jackson used his second State of the Union address to defend the Indian Removal Act. To his critics, who quote wept over the fate of the aboriges and who, it turned out, accurately predicted the horrors of the forced migrations known collectively to history as the Trail of Tears. Jackson offered an archaeological lesson. Any melancholy reflections were ahistorical, he said, because the Indians were neither innocent victims nor first peoples, but perpetrators of what Jackson's modern admirers might call white genocide. "Oh boy, this sounds like a fun video." "In the monuments and fortifications of an unknown people, we behold the memorials of a once powerful race," said Jackson. exterminated to make room for the existing savage tribes. This reference to a once powerful race was not lost on the American public of 1830. Every school boy and girl knew it to be the lost race of the mound builders, believed to be the continent's original Caucasian inhabitants. From the colonial era into the 20th century, it was widely accepted that certain earthn structures and burial grounds proved the existence of white or Indo-Uropean peoples who settled in North America only to be wiped out by the arrival of Jackson's savage asiatic tribes. He wasn't attacking a native people, the indigenous Americans. He was avenging the real builders of America, the real people who built this country, the white ones. As the country expanded west, the mound builders myth had obvious utility.
If the Indians destroyed earlier waves of white settlers, their own extermination was just another turn of history's wheel.
Jesus, I didn't know this. This is [ __ ] up and very Nazis-esque.
foreshadowing is a literary device. And now one thing you probably thinking about before Hyperorean knowledge mentioned the lost continent of Moo before. What is Moo? Moo is a theoretical continent first conceived 19th century by Augustus Le plung. as he claims. While investigating the Mayan ruins, he determined the Yucatan people predated the ancient Egyptians and Greeks, which is a fascinating thing to say considering that the Mayans started inhabiting the Yucatan in 1500 BC, but didn't start building the ruins that Augustus was investigating until the earliest 250 BC. Ancient Egypt for comparison was at its earliest founded in 3150 BC just over 3,000 years off.
Anyway, Augustus claimed he had a translation of the papavilla, an Mayan text that I probably mangle pronunciation of. We have the translit by the way. We don't really need to compare it to what he says cuz he's just wrong. But he claimed he had a translation of it. Anyway, Moo he claimed was an ancient island nation on the Atlantic Ocean that the Yucatan people knew about next to Atlantis, I think. Now, several other people claimed to have found evidence of Moo, like James Church, who found clay tablets from India. Yucatan, India, right next to each other, right? Who knows? Anyway, James Churchwood claimed he found evidence of Moo. It wasn't in the Atlantic. It was in the Pacific. And he claimed that Moo really did exist because he found tablets in an Indian site for it. But don't ask about those tablets, though, because much like John Smith and the golden plates of Borbinism, you got to take his word that they existed. He couldn't share them. It was too secret. I guess he also conflated moo with lumeriia, a place from which it was believed that certain species of animals migrated to mainland Asia like lemurs, hence the name Lriia.
I think also Hyporeian knowledge mentions Larriia as well in that video.
>> It it's a story that goes back as far as time. That's why we see with Atlantis and Hyperoreia, Lamuria again, Lamuria is kind of like a prototy setting as well.
And it from its inception I believe was ruled by sorcerer kings. But that's a tale for a different day.
>> Church word went farther though implying that the people of Moo not just animals but people traveled throughout the world to bring civilization to the savage earth. And from them we got everything.
Seems kind of familiar doesn't it? It is the basis of most ancient astronaut theories. In other words, it directly inspired ancient aliens. It also inspired fantasy literature kind of.
There's several fantasy stories out there that center on lost civilizations, but often the context is substantially different. They didn't found society. It was just an older era of human culture.
Hayamiaki's Castle in the Sky and Nausea focus on civilizations destroyed themselves using rogue technology. The lesson there is not to repeat the mistakes of the past. Michael Morcock's Elrich comes from the lost civilization of Mel Nibbon. But unlike Moo, while Nibbon's influence is widespread, the entire civilization dies near the start of the saga, leaving nearly no trace it ever existed come the story's end. It's the story of a society in decline. The antithesis of what was traditional at the time. As Vic Conan, well, the Hiboreian Ag's main legacy isn't lost technology. It's pure ruin, lost to time. While some can see it as a high age of strength, it's also an era that exists in continuity with Lovecraft's Cthulhu mythos. And as we see there, the lost history shows how small and fragile mankind is in the scheme of reality. All of these adventures of Conan are lost.
But that's proof that all of humanity can meet a similar fate. All while Cthulhu, who was there the whole time, can emerge and never notice a difference between the Hiboreian age and the modern era. But here's the thing. The Hiboreian age, which takes place after the sinking of Atlantis, but prior to Sumer's rise, is meant to be forgotten. There is no trace of it in society. Had no impact.
It's a forgotten time. And this because while Robert Howard loved history, he was afraid of writing a story set in a historical era because he didn't want to be inaccurate. He didn't want to contradict the facts. What he wanted was a story set in history without the burden of knowing history perfectly. He didn't want to bump into the limits of real ancient history, so he made up his own timeline. Hiboreian knowledge's point though about Atlantis seems tied in with Conan. How these Atlantean sorcerers control modern society.
However, Hyperorean knowledge's point tying in Atlantis to the Hiboreian age is defeated by one crucial thing about Conan's stories. One key element that completely contradicts everything that he said up in that original video. Conan doesn't let the sorcerers live.
The other big thing that's kind of being ignored here in the Conan stories, Conan becomes king. Not the sorcerers, not the snake people, Conan. And the sorcerers try stopping Conan and they all fail.
How can these sorcerers run the modern era when they got killed by Conan? You see, if you tie our conspiracy that Hyperworian knowledge has created with Conan, you run into the problem that Conan killed the guys you're talking about. So, there's no reason to worry about them. They're all dead. One commonality with a lot of these fallen civilizations is that they're frequently shown to be the cause of their own decline, and they're frequently not influential to the rest of society or human history. Hyperorean knowledge subscribes to these ancient civilizations constructed the modern era. In effect, ancient aliens. But the fiction we're reading all shows how that's not the case. They're forgotten.
That being said, though, there are some works of fiction that do imply that ancient civilizations came to a savage world and brought culture to it. And typically speaking, these works have been celebrated by certain circles of the political alignment. I don't know if you know this, but recently the Daily Wire, yes, the right-wing organization Daily Wire, adapted the Pen Dragon cycle into a TV series, and the show is aggressively mid. If you watch A Night of the Seven Kingdoms, you got a better deal, guaranteed a better fantasy television experience for sure. However, I do want to bring something up about the series I think is interesting and reflective of what Hyperworian Knowledge is obsessing over. The series and the books they're based on features Atlantis as a major civilization in the plot of King Arthur. Because here the Atlanteanss who are all remarkably attractive Aryan looking characters with extended lifespans, they all travel to England after their island nation sinks.
And the Atlanteanss are heavily inspired by Minoan society. Now all of this is done to tie Atlantis to some tangible reality, something the audience can relate to. Menoa is a real lost civilization. Atlantis looks like Monoa.
Therefore, it ties in with some history.
And apparently this is responsible for modern England, for King Arthur, for Merlin. But they fall not because of technology, but because they worship a pagan god. And that the real god punishes them for their hubris. It's odd how a show made predominantly by the right-wing Daily Wire argues that Western cultures architect Merlin, descended from two lost civilizations, the Atlanteanss and the Hyperoreans.
Oh, wait. I just realized I never actually explained who Hyperoreia even is. Hyperoreia is the mythical nation described in ancient Greek mythology as the homeland of all people in Europe.
It's a nation north of Greece and many scholars have concluded that that the original stories might have been describing the British Isles, Greenland or Iceland. The Hyperoreans are the Kelts or even the Picss culturally, which when you put it that way, makes it much less of a lost civilization and more of a known civilization that had its entire original identity destroyed by invading cultures like modern-day British people going across the world and invading other cultures and destroying them. Interesting. Hyporia could also been Norway, maybe though, which is, you know, but that's not the point. The point is it's up north and there's people living in it. Hyporia is not really the birthplace civilization, by the way. All homo sapiens came from Africa and civilization started up more in the Middle East than in Europe.
Mesopotamia is the first society on record, not ancient Greece, not Rome, certainly not the picss. Egypt was already ancient by the time the Manoans were around. By the time Athens was founded, the pyramids had been around for thousands of years already. So, the existence of hyperoreia, as we understand it in pop culture, is a myth.
It's no more real than the Garden of Eden. It's a beautiful place supposedly where mankind came from but cannot return to. It's not part of a secret history. It's part of a collective dream that there's a better place than right now. Hype waroria liaria. Those are all terms you don't just throw around willy-nilly. They're terms forever associated with one person. Helena Blavatzky. Blavski is essentially the mother of 19th century spiritualism. She claimed to have traveled the world and uncovered hidden esoteric secrets to the nature of human history and of the soul.
She claimed to have in Tibet encountered spiritual masters who informed her about the religion of theosophy which she officially founded in New York in 1875.
It is a religious order but also not always recognized as a religious order.
Bllovodsky in the process of making theosophy appropriated mythology, Eastern mysticism and Buddhist iconography to create an order that argued that the material world was an outer reflection of a singular absolute entity. In relation to Lumeriia, Helena claimed it was the place from which the masters and humanity's precursors came from to populate the world. This idea of a birthplace of civilization centered on Laia in the Pacific significantly farther from the supposed location before of Hyperoreia in myth refocused the world on Asian culture and thus a lot of mysticism drew more from Asian culture than it did from European culture. Theosophy inspired countless other faiths and many took Laia's concept of a birthplace civilization and applied it elsewhere because it couldn't possibly be that we came from Asia or Africa. We had to come from Europe.
Culture had to come from a place of whiteness. And thus many settled on Hyperoreia, the myth of Greek mythology that said that civilization came from a northern country in Europe. One that even predated Atlantis. And there was a capital of Hyperoreia that mystics claimed was where all of human civilization came from, Thu. And thus we enter the Thu Society, an esoteric order inspired by theosophy and white supremacy. The Thu is an extension of the Vulkish movement, a branch of mystic studies that argue that Germany was the center of society. Thu itself is in reference to Ultima Thu, a city believed to be Hyper Warrior's capital from which came the Aryan race. The membership of the Thu Society would later become more well known for being the core members of Germany's National Socialist Party aka the Nazis. Hyperorean Knowledg's name is a direct reference to Nazi conspiracy theories. Members of the Thor society argued that their generation had been overtaken by Jews and communists who wanted to degrade their society through degenerate imagery. The Thor society was contemporary to the Weimar Republic, an era of development in Germany where the arts and culture flourished. It was during this time that the first hospital studying trans identity were founded.
Yes, decades before Christine Jorgensson's transition and even further before John Money's controversial studies. It was in Germany that these sciences were first perfected. German expressionists also helped invent modern fantasy, horror, and science fiction.
From Noseratu to Metropolis, the iconography of storytelling came from Germany at this time. And the Thu Society did not like that. Members of the Thor society presented the Jewish people as monstrous, as gremlins, as goblins to dehumanize them. Sound familiar? Well, they say it was Neanderthal predation, which I can kind of agree with and kind of see, but it was also orc predation. It was giant predation. It was sorcerer predation.
And that's what this created is a founder effect. Only the humans who could survive all those pressures live to reproduce. Those are the people that we descend from. Now, am I saying that the hyperorgan knowledge is intentionally creating a neo society using coded language to hide his true ideas? As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter what he's intentionally doing. What matters is what he's doing.
Undeniably, Hyperorean knowledge is lifting from the beliefs that the Thor society used to promote their beliefs.
It's the idea there are certain people who are inhuman, lesser than people who are invading and corrupting us from within. our degenerate art is influencing our generations and that we have to fight back. We can't be controlled. We have to resist. That is Nazi rhetoric. That is the rhetoric of those times brought into our world through a different lens. I don't really care if Hyperorean knowledge believes what he's saying or knows it's fake because what he's doing is creating a mythology, a construct to influence his gullible audience to believe what he says. Who are the people he claims to be the enemy? Those influencing the hobby, hiding the secret knowledge, normies, mainstream society, feminists, SJWs, DEI, all of that. You don't need to say the words. We know what you're saying.
You're not that slick. You're like trying to imply that mainstream people, that people with brains and hearts and souls are the ones who are orcs and giants and sorcerers of a snake reptilian variety. Hyperorean knowledge is not spreading knowledge. He's pulling the wool over the eyes of his audience and they're buying into it because they want to be part of a fun conspiracy.
They want to believe there's orcs and goblins to fight. But the reality is the iconography being used was used already in 1918 when the Thu Society was founded and it became one of the most dangerous societies in human history because it helped create the infrastructure that overtook Germany in 1933 and became the party that started World War II. You cannot dismiss this as just some stupid little YouTube channel. You cannot dismiss this as just some small little thing. This is dangerous rhetoric. When you see these conspiracy theorists, it's not simply just for the fun of it. It's because what they're doing echoes back centuries. Echoes back to violence that was real.
It is not permissible and it is not worth overlooking. Don't you want devoted followers who leave their families for you, give their money to you, give their bodies to you, give up their lives for you, consider you God, and will kill for Thank you.
Related Videos
VALORANT's Latest 'Exclusive' Tier Bundle is Rough...
KangaValorant
17K views•2026-05-28
Flight Attendant Mocks Poor Looking Black Woman — Mid Air Announcement Exposes Her Real Power
SkyboundStories-b4r
184 views•2026-05-28
I FIXED My Friend’s Blown Turbo RX-8… Then Sold It
Cameron-RX8
134 views•2026-05-28
NewsWatch 12 at 5: Top Stories
NewsWatch12
1K views•2026-05-28
Simon Jordan & Danny Murphy deliver PREDICTIONS for Arsenal's Champions League FINAL with PSG
talkSPORTArsenal
6K views•2026-05-28
Botting is OUT OF CONTROL in Classic WoW (Again)...
SolheimGaming
108 views•2026-05-28
The "AI Job Apocalypse" is CANCELLED!
WesRoth
9K views•2026-05-28
STREET FIGHTER 6 - INGRID Story Walkthrough @ 4K 60ᶠᵖˢ ✔
RajmanGamingHD
12K views•2026-05-28











