ISLAMISTS GOT 12% AT LOCAL ELECTION

Hinzugefügt: 2026-05-16

[00:00:00]Well, the analysis is in. 570 Islamist jihadis were elected at the last local elections. There are gradients of Islamists, and so we're going to go through this in detail, but this is the biggest step forward in the Islamization of any country, I think, since the war in Lebanon, the civil war in which the Christian Maronites were thrown out in favor of Islamism. And not everybody on the list produced by the Henry Jackson Society is a Muslim, but I'm going to get into exactly how they define these sectarian-style candidates.

[00:00:41]Hello, everyone. This is Andre Walker.

[00:00:43]Thanks so much for supporting this channel. Thanks for watching. Thanks for subscribing. Please do hit the bell notification icon. It's the best way to guarantee you get all my videos as soon as they are released. Well, the Henry Jackson Society, run by Alan Mendoza, is an absolutely brilliant organization. It effectively looks at how to support Western democracy by looking into extremism, and it's an anti-extremism task force. Do you know something? When you meet Alan, or indeed any of his staff, they've got this amazing working knowledge of, you know, who are the Muslim Brotherhood, who are Al Muhajiroun, who are, you know, Hamas in the UK, IRGC, and all this sort of thing. All this stuff that I fear, on the occasions, you and I don't understand perhaps as well as we could have. Well, we were very worried, of course, about Thursday's election. Yesterday, I made a video talking about what I think will be the the new policies that many of these Islamists will want to bring in. But what the Henry Jackson Society have done, which is absolutely brilliant, is they've come up with an analysis of how many there are. So, there were there were 5,047 seats contested, and there uh were uh 570 Islamists selected. Now, that is not Muslims, just to be clear. Uh Henry Jackson went through all of the candidates, looked at their manifestos, and then decided who they felt were uh if you like sectarian-style candidates.

[00:02:13]And let me give you uh the description of that. You don't see me often in glasses because, well, I largely don't need them but for a little bit of reading. Okay. So, the actual number is 574. So, first of all, they've said the breakdown by party. Green Party 350 elected candidates, independents 132 elected candidates, Labour Party 84 elected candidates, Liberal Democrats six elected candidates. I need hardly say zero Conservative, zero Reform, zero Restore, uh zero Advance. Obviously, I mean, I you know, I think it's pretty obvious, but but I think I'll say it just just anyway, just in case.

[00:02:53]Okay. Um a candidate was coded as a Muslim sectarian in the Henry Jackson Society's pre-election report uh when there was evidence of repeated and saliently foregrounded issues of Muslim communal grievance, uh transnational Muslim causes as a central part of their political appeal. That is to say that basically, the reason why they were saying vote for me is because of these uh couple of things, which are um which are effectively Muslim communal grievance and transnational Muslim causes. That is to say, vote for me and I will help the Muslim community in Britain be your number one political issue, or vote for me and I will support Gaza, or I will support the Rohingya, or Oh, what am I talking about? The reality is that none of these candidates are actually talking about the Uyghur genocide in China, the Rohingya genocide, or indeed what's going on in uh Syria, or indeed in Libya. What they're all talking about is Gaza and Palestine. So, uh now some people say that is uh some people say that that is um anti-Semitic. I don't know. I don't care. I I just think the reality is it just tells you a great deal about who they are as people [clears throat] and what their agenda is. So, they're not running for Birmingham City Council in order to assist Birmingham. They're saying vote for me and I will support the people of Gaza, um which I find absolutely astonishing from a British election. Okay. Emma Shubert from the Henry Jackson Society, she's a uh research fellow. She says, "The focus after the results may be on which political leaders are fighting for survival, but the real battle is for the integrity of local democracy."

[00:04:38]With 574 sectarian-style candidates elected, it is clear that this form of politics is gaining ground and cannot be ignored.

[00:04:48]Local elections are increasingly being used to fight political battles on issues councils have no power to resolve. And that risks distorting democratic accountability and deepening divisions within communities.

[00:05:02]These results reinforce the central finding of our research that these outcomes are not random, but follow a clear identifiable pattern. Where the underlying conditions exist, this type of campaign can succeed, and that is exactly what we are now seeing reflected in the results. What is Emma Shubert saying? What she's basically saying is this. Um Muslims vote Muslim. Now, it is an important caveat here. Look, I've helped out with the British Bangladeshi Catering Association. I also suggested that we have the first Muslim uh of a royal borough, who I thought was absolutely fantastic, guy called Asghar Majeed. His sister, by the way, gave up her job where she was earning 150 grand a year to be the full-time mayoress on 10 grand a year. And I think that level of commitment is laudable. But uh what what we're talking about here is where you've created these enclaves, what Dr. David Starkey calls the tribal areas, which is to say that you're uh transmit transporting people one by one from one village in Pakistan to one village or town in Britain. So, you are not creating a multicultural society.

[00:06:11]You are not uh in a sense, you're not even creating immigration. It's just a settler community. It is to say, "We're all from the same village in Pakistan.

[00:06:20]We're all moving here." And you're just transferring that same village, that same culture, that that same language, that same religion, that same dress code, and everything to somewhere like Nelson, to somewhere like Birmingham, to somewhere like Bradford, somewhere like Keighley. Now, have I ever said that these people are bad? No, no, I haven't. Um I'm not saying that the colonialists of the 19th century were bad people. What I'm saying is that they were they were effectively invaders within a particular country.

[00:06:51]Because what would happen is uh the English would turn up in in Pakistan or in India, or in Bangladesh as it is today, and start start imposing their ways on them. They weren't intending to be nasty. That's just the way it happened. And what doesn't happen is you don't have when it comes to immigration, one person living on the edge of on every single street. What happens is you just have these enclaves.

[00:07:14]And what Mr. Chubatiz is talking about is to say that when you have these closed communities, what happens is political parties become irrelevant. What becomes relevant is if they're talking about the issues of global jihad, talking about the issues of uh struggle, talking about the issues of Islamic grievance. Now, if you think about it, 574 is probably about 12% of the election.

[00:07:43]So, if you think about it, jihadis, Islamists won about 12%. Now, uh what is it? The total number of Muslims in Britain, about 6%. So, effectively, they're they're boxing above their weight, and that doesn't include people who've just been elected who happen to be Muslim. What I think you're talking about here is something that is an effect in politics. The fact that if you're if you're organized and you have a specific cause group, whether that be a religion, whether that be uh the Fabian Society, whether that be um just a group of things like the car workers of Sunderland, you know, you will be disproportionately more likely to be elected. That's why the Fabian Society so dominates uh left-wing or Labour politics. And so, what you are going to see in an area is you don't need it to be majority Muslim for it to become Muslim-dominated, simply because locals just don't come and bother voting, and whereas the mosque will all tell people to vote. But, I think you have another problem whereby I know that party politics has broken down a little bit, but if you are now just doing ethnic or religious voting, that's going to change things significantly. I said the other day that I my family left Northern Ireland because of sectarianism. Now, uh I'm not saying that the Protestants were perfect. I'm not saying the Catholics were perfect. I'm certainly not saying that the UVF and the IRA were perfect.

[00:09:02]Um but people within those communities were the principal victims of sectarian politics. When you have Muslims voting Muslim and Christians voting Christian, we haven't had so much Christians voting Christian yet, though that will be the inevitable result. Um then you are going to have a society which becomes much more fractured. I personally believe that uncontrolled immigration will create a fractured society anyway. And I think actually in Britain, what we are moving towards is what I call the two-state solution uh to the British question, which is to say, what do you do about the fact that some areas are tribal Muslim areas and some areas are what we would think of as the United Kingdom, and the two-state solution is what we're doing. To have an alternative policing strategy, to have Sharia courts, to have uh schools that are Islamic, uh to have mosques and halal meat and all that. And just uh those areas now are governed in a different way to the rest of the United Kingdom, and that's what I call the two-state solution. If you look at the situation over Aston Villa, this was the first tribal area to effectively have an immigration policy of its own. That is to say that no Jew should be allowed into Aston um without the permission of the Muslim elders of that area, and that was going to be declined for Maccabi Tel Aviv. Very, very worrying situation.

[00:10:24]Please do donate to Patreon fund below if you want to fight back uh for British justice and for British patriots. Till next time. Goodbye.