The video skillfully exploits genuine astrophysical anomalies to spin a sensationalist narrative of institutional suppression. It prioritizes provocative speculation over the rigorous, albeit slower, process of scientific peer review.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
New 3I Atlas discovery! And NASA is still hiding the truth!Added:
Good afternoon, alien enthusiasts. It's the angry astronaut, and we're catching up with three eye atlas today. Third confirmed interstellar object, which came from outside our solar system, dove past the sun, and it's still here doing things that no natural comet should do.
We've got raw juice spacecraft photography directly contradicts the official ISSA story released about the same observations. We've got a persistent anti-tail and sunward pointing coma that laughs at solar wind physics. We've got detium levels so high that they scream nuclear fuel. And the mainstream crickets as usual. This is a full deep dive. No fluff, no trusty experts copouts. Let's tear this apart geometrically, scientifically, and honestly. And if you're new here, please smash like and subscribe. We don't let anomalies die quietly.
Good afternoon, alien enthusiasts, and welcome to another angry alien bulletin.
I am still here in London. Decided to extend my stay just one more day before I leave the UK for a while. Going to be joining my son actually in Colorado for a couple of months. I'm very happy about that because I haven't seen him on that extended of a basis anyway for quite some time. I'm very excited about that.
In the meantime though, let's talk about three eye atlas because that is a topic I haven't talked about in a little while on this channel and it hasn't been discussed much in general in the scientific community aside from recent findings from the issa juice probe. Now, as far as that probe is concerned, it's great that we finally got the images um from Juice. And actually, I've already uh shown you those images here on this channel um in a previous video about a month ago. But some of the findings that issa and NASA claim that we have from Juice are a bit bizarre. If you look at this recent diagram, you will see that apparently according to the findings of NASA, issa etc. especially issa. I guess you have an ion tail, a commentary tail pointed directly away from the sun, exactly the way it's supposed to. You have a dust tail, which is very different from an ion tail that's trailing behind in the direction of the previous movement of three eye atlas.
But then you have this ion tail pointing directly away from the sun, precisely as it's supposed to be. So that's the end of that whole mystery. There isn't really an anti tale that was all a perspective issue, an optical illusion created by the perspective of Earth and Earthbound telescopes, uh, versus how Three Atlas was actually oriented. The Juice probe is far closer to three Atlas and directly between three Atlas and the Sun or almost directly in between anyway. and so therefore should have been able to get a better perspective than anybody. But here's the reality.
None of this is true. This diagram is completely inaccurate. And I'm going to prove all of this to you right now.
Okay, first of all, I've got a full disclosure. As many of you probably know, I've made some powerful enemies in this game. Avi lobe, the Harvard guy who's been pounding the table on interstellar objects, went after my friend and colleague Dr. Beatatric Villa and the Vasco project hard on medium. He tried to wave away their disappearing star transients as cosmic rays. I defended Beatatric live on this channel.
I walk through the data. These transients on the old Palomar plates, proving that they cannot be explained by cosmic rays, instrumentation glitches, or plate defects the way that he suggested. The statistics, the simultaneity, the lack of afterglows, it just doesn't add up. Lo got so angry that he banned me from his Medium articles and comments. I can't even read his stuff anymore. Now look, personal is personal, but on three I Atlas, well, Loe is still right. This thing is profoundly weird, and he's been cataloging the anomalies while a lot of the community stays quiet. Credit where credit is due, even if we've clashed. So powerful enemies, well, yeah, it's still worth it. So, let's set the stage. What is three Atlas and what isn't it?
Discovered on July the 1st, 2025 by the Atlas survey in Chile. It has a hyperbolic orbit unbound with an interstellar origin. It's the third interstellar object we found since Amua Mua and two I Borisov in 2017 and 2019 respectively. and it passed perihelion on October the 29th, 2025 at about 203 million kilometers from the sun. Still unbound and it's still in our solar system as of now. Normal comets, well, they sublime ices and produce gas and dust. They get pushed by solar radiation and wind into these classic tails. They have ion tails that are straight antisolar and dust tails that are curved but generally away from the sun.
Textbook stuff. Whereas three I atlas was different from day one.
Okay, so that's the Avi drama out of the way. Sorry for the delay in terms of giving you additional information on this these findings from the Juice Probe. this additional information that we have about three Atlas. But given the fact that I was going to be quoting a lot from Avi Lobe, I think it was important that I addressed all of that.
But now it's absolutely time to show you the geometry behind's claim or behind the claims of the major space agencies here and what three Atlas is actually doing.
So, here's the meat of what's been going on lately. In November of 2025, the Juice probe is out there. By the way, the Juice is a probe designed to explore the icy moons of Jupiter, and it's perfectly positioned for a close encounter. about 66 million km at its closest which is far closer than Earth or any of its associated telescopes came to three eye atlas and they released this as a view from above diagram with a green ion plasma tail shooting anti- solar and a blue dust trail lagging the orbit at a massive 110° separation from the ion tail juice is parked nearby almost along the sun comet radial. Looks clean on paper, but let's look at the actual nav cam Janus image from Juice at around the same time. The black and white one that we're looking at right now. It has a dominant bright coma and a main tail or haze structure fanning downward in the frame. The whole thing looks coherent in one primary direction, consistent with sunward anti-tail geometry. No obvious second feature shooting off at a wide angle opposite the main structure.
Geometrically, if that diagram is accurate, but juice is nearly on the sun comet line. The true anti- solar ion tail should be running almost straight along our line of sight, heavily foreshortened and buried in the comb of brightness. Maybe a little stub emerging on the far side opposite of where any sideon dust trail would project. And we don't see that clean separation. We see material concentrated in a way that matches the persistent sunward features reported earlier in three eye atlas's anti tale. Isa's own diagram proves that their photo doesn't match the story they're selling and perspective doesn't save it here. From that vantage point, the mismatch is glaring. These two tails do not appear in the photos in the location that they supposedly appear in the diagram. This is very very odd. Just a glaring glaring inconsistency. And this isn't a one-off. Pre-p perihelion and postparian Hubble ground telescopes and peer-reviewed papers show a legitimate sunward anti tail over a billion kilometers long in some reports plus an entire teardropshaped coma pointing at the sun. Avibe himself noted postparen images showing no clear anti-olar tail like normal comets even when compared side by side with solar system comets that do show proper tails.
Anti happen in comets usually from large dust grains or specific viewing geometry when Earth crosses the orbital plane.
But this one persisted across angles and time. It's not just projection. So, classic comet diagrams, as you can see, have an ion tail directly away from the sun and a dust tail lagging but generally antisolar. Both affected by solar forces. And three atlas seems to have dominant features that can shrug these solar forces off. Why? Well, because it only is made up of large particles. Well, fine. But where's the gas, the ions, the classic tails that must come with sublimation? They're completely missing from these photographs or suppressed. And here's what annoys me the most. And NASA are trying to convince us that there's nothing a miss here. that these tales, the ion tail and dust tail are appearing exactly as they should with typical commentary behavior, which is absolutely not the case. The ion tail isn't where they say it is. And even if it were, the fact that the dust tail seems completely unaffected by solar radiation, that alone is bizarre. And once again, they say nothing about it.
So, here's the big question then. Why the hell would these major space agencies be doing this? Why would NASA and ISSA be giving us an incorrect diagram, an inaccurate depiction of reality? Why are they showing us the commentary tales or the two commentary tales that is of Three Eye Atlas? If they are indeed commentary tales, which I don't think they really are, why would they be showing us this in a deceptive way?
So, let's zoom out. This isn't the first time we've seen this exact pattern with interstellar visitors. First came Amua Mua in 2017 with no coma, no visible outgassing, and yet it showed clear non-gravitational acceleration. The force was there pushing it away from the sun exactly like radiation pressure or outgassing should. But we couldn't see the mechanism invisible NGA for the first time in astronomical history and we've never seen it since. Instead of treating that as a massive red flag, the community proposed one exotic natural explanation after another, a hydrogen iceberg or molecular hydrogen or a nitrogen iceberg, whatever. Then they quietly moved on. They acknowledged the acceleration in the papers, but the mainstream narrative never really grappled with how weird it was. The simplest explanation stayed off the table. than 2I Borisov in 2019. This was probably a typical comet, but it did have unusual composition. Ridiculously high carbon monoxide levels, polarometric properties that didn't match typical comets. Again, noted in technical papers, but no one rewrote the textbooks. Just another weird but natural interstellar comet. Now threeey atlas with a persistent anti-tail and a sunward teardrop coma even imposed parihelion complex jets in multiple directions deterium off the charts and our own juice photo that doesn't match the pretty ESA diagram. So here's the thing I want to be crystal clear. I don't think this is some grand malicious cover up with guys in black suits burying files in a basement. I think it's simpler and honestly more frustrating. The anti-tail, the sunward pointing coma, the fact that neither of the visible tails behaves like they should under solar, wind, and radiation pressure. These things are inconvenient to the standard paradigm. The paradigm that says that every interstellar object is just a pristine relic from another stars protolanetary disc, behaving exactly like our local comets. once you account for distance and viewing angle.
So what do they do? They assume the real ion plasma tail, the one that must exist according to textbook physics, is hidden behind the bright coma, forhortened along our line of sight from Juice's position. Fair enough as a hypothesis.
But what about the tails we can see? The ones dominating the images from Hubble, ground telescopes, and Juice's own images. the ones that are either pointing sunward or weird angles that shrug off solar forces entirely. Well, they don't have a clean model for that.
So, they just ignore them or downplay them or focus press releases on the water vapor detected and dust activity parts that fit the narrative while the anomalous geometry and isotope data get buried in preprints or avi medium posts just like they did with AmuA Mua's invisible NGA. Acknowledge it technically, propose some natural patch, and then silence. No big public deep dive campaigns. No urgent follow-up missions prioritized. Business as usual.
This is paradigm protection in action.
Not conspiracy, but institutional inertia. When data challenges your worldview, it's easier to sideline the inconvenient bits than to rethink the whole framework. And meanwhile, three eye atlas is still out there, still in our solar system, still outbound, but with plenty of time for more observations. More data is coming in from Hubble, the James Web Space Telescope, and future juice releases, and also the Juno probe, which took its own photographs. But if the pattern holds, the anomalies will stay politely in the background.
And then lastly, I think it's best to address some of the other anomalies involved with the three eye atlas, especially the high presence, the high concentration of dutyium and my personal explanation, or at least a theory that I've been cooking up over the last year or so as to what this anti-tale and what this dust tail might actually be and what three eye atlas truly is.
So, here's the bombshell data that everybody should be talking about. The James Web Space Telescope and ALMA spectroscopy revealed insanely high detium to hydrogen ratios in the coma in water and especially methane. We're talking detium to hydrogen levels orders of magnitude above any known comet or solar system object. actually significantly above just about every object we've ever detected in the universe. One paper showed.95% in water, which is 10 times that of normal comets, and another 3.3% in methane. That's thousands of times higher than solar system methane levels.
And carbon isotopes are also anomalous.
And here's the deal. Detium is prime fusion fuel. Avibe has openly discussed this as potential nuclear fuel signatures. Now the natural explanation maybe it formed in some extreme cold interstellar cloud 10 to 12 billion years ago. But combined with the tail anomalies, the lack of normal outgassing behavior and the activity levels, it just stretches credul. My take on this is it could be artificial. The dust tail could actually be directed exhaust, high velocity material that ignores the solar wind. And the anti-tail could be a massive swarm of nano machines or collectors harvesting material before it leaves the solar system again. Large particles that don't get pushed aside easily. Well, that's convenient if you're engineering it that way.
Sublimation shouldn't produce only those kinds of particles. So, what do you folks think? Is Three Eye Atlas a weird natural relic that somehow only sheds giant particles, has fusion level dutyium, and defies solar wind physics?
Or is something more going on than the current paradigm just isn't ready to face? Drop your thoughts below. Which anomaly hits you the hardest, the tail mismatch, the detium, the persistent anti-tale, or the way the community handles these things? Have you dug into Loe's posts or the James web papers?
Link some of them in the comments and I'll put a few more in the description.
Although I can't put Medium links in there because I don't have access to them anymore. If you want me to keep hammering this story as new data becomes available, then please subscribe and turn that notification bell on and share it with somebody who needs to see it.
And also, please consider supporting this channel on Patreon. All the details are in the description. We're not letting inconvenient truths get buried by silence. This is the angry astronaut.
Stay curious, question everything, and stay angry about space.
Related Videos
Spiral Galaxy NGC 3370 from Hubble | NASA APOD 2025-11-05 #Shorts
galaxygallery
938 views•2026-05-30
SOMETHING inside the SUN is CHANGING
RaysAstrophotography
1K views•2026-06-03
Captured the Blue Moon (with a twist) 🌙✨ #space #bluemoon #telescope
realAstroExplorer
674 views•2026-06-01
There May Be A Giant Hole In The Universe... And We Might Be Inside It | The Cosmic Ledger Entry 015
TheCosmicLedger
145 views•2026-05-31
The Map We Sent to the Stars in 1977 — Why Scientists Now Regret It
TheAncientRecord7
183 views•2026-06-03
10 Planet Where a Black Hole Replaces the Sun
cosmicexplorer-EN
147 views•2026-06-02
Is this a copy of our galaxy? Discover Galaxy M81!
UniverseDocumentaries-cc4mb
995 views•2026-05-31
Solar Flares and CMEs at Earth - More Likely | S0 News June.3.2026
SpaceWeatherNewsS0s
2K views•2026-06-03











