The executive branch’s attempt to bypass the "power of the purse" is a direct assault on the constitutional checks and balances that prevent executive autocracy. By weaponizing public funds for political ends, this move erodes the very foundation of legislative oversight.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Trump administration defends $1.8B fund as DOJ gives Trump tax immunityAdded:
The Justice Department reached a settlement with President Trump this week after he agreed to drop his10 billion dollar lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns. Part of the settlement includes a nearly $1.8 billion quote anti-weaponization fund.
NPR's Tom Dbach reports the administration says it will consider giving a portion of those funds to January 6th defendants. Trump administration officials say people who believe the government was weaponized against them should apply for taxpayer funded restitution through the Justice Department's upcoming anti-weaponization fund. And officials would not rule out making payments to Trump supporters who violently assaulted police during the January 6th attack on the capital. Vice President JD Vance told reporters they would evaluate applications on a case-bycase basis.
>> We're trying to compensate people where the book was thrown at them. They were mistreated by the legal system.
>> Democrats have condemned the initiative, calling it a slush fund for Trump's allies.
>> Meanwhile, NPR's Eric McDaniel reports constitutional scholars are also questioning the legality of the move.
>> It's article 1, section 9 of the US Constitution. Congress gets to decide how money is allocated, but President Trump just set up an almost $2 billion fund to give money to people he says have been subjected to a politicized justice department. The acting attorney general told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that might include people who stormed the capital on January 6th, 2021. The 14th amendment also includes a provision that bars payments to insurrectionists.
But Gerard Maloka, law professor at Indiana University, says it's unclear whether any January 6th payouts would also violate that clause.
>> And on Tuesday, the Justice Department inserted a supplement to that deal with the president. It would bar the government quote forever from investigating any outstanding tax claims against Trump, his sons, or the Trump Organization. I'm Corva Coleman, NPR News. For more of today's news, be sure to like and follow us or check out NPR News Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











