While the historical content is significant, the "reaction" format inevitably turns a complex moral crusade into a performative spectacle for digital engagement. It simplifies a profound historical shift into a shallow piece of intellectual entertainment.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
AMERICAN REACTS toThe British Crusade AGAINST SlaveryAdded:
Yo, what's good gang? It's the dope guy and I am back with another video big dog. Yo, hope you guys are all doing well out there because I'm doing all right. Here I am spinning the block with content for y'all man my soul. Today's video we got the British crusade against slavery, how Britain ended the slave trade for all. Yo man, this was heavily heavily requested by a lot of y'all man.
Y'all want me to tap into this video.
Well, I couldn't find the original video man. Someone sent me the link so shout out to you big dog for sending me the link. You know what I'm saying? Ever since I started tapping in with World War II and all that stuff man. Get a lot of a lot of comments man. I appreciate y'all for chiming in and having your own opinion about everything. And shout out to y'all for wanting me to tap in with this video so I cannot wait to get into it. [music] The British crusade against slavery. But before we tap in, subscribe to the dope guy that way to get notifications every time I upload. And from my handle Snapchat and Instagram right across the bottom screen.
So that being said, I'm not going to hold y'all much longer cuz y'all already know that's cool big dog. Let's get into it.
Yes sirski.
Britain's criminal stupid attitudes to race and immigration are beyond parody.
By Frankie Boyle.
For those who aren't aware, Frankie Boyle is a famous Scottish comedian.
Who is most renowned for being pretty damn offensive. Needless to say, I'm a fan of his. And so when Frankie Boyle writes an article for the Guardian of all places.
With the subtitle the anti-immigration election rhetoric is perverse. We fear the arrival of people we have driven with the wealth we stole from them. I can see the misinformation coming a mile away.
>> Okay. So Frankie begins the article by waffling in an overly verbose manner reminiscent of Charlie Brooker, another man who I am a fan of but has been led astray by misinformation. And it's full of these sort of contradictions that I'm sure sounded good when he was writing them. But when you actually think about it.
I'd rather silly. I mean here he is pointing out the irony of the leaders being nationalist.
>> There have been a couple of amusing moments in the campaign where leaders stand in front of Union Jacks expounding on the need for Mr. Sison taking them to the cleaners about the dangers of nationalism. Personally, I think it might be invigorating to have a And only about the Scottish National Party. After making a crack about how the Scottish discovered penicillin taking credit for this for some reason.
And for some reason he seems to mix up the concepts of trade and immigration.
But these really aren't very important.
I'm not even bothered that he just assumes that an Australian-style point system for immigration will obviously be a racist system that caters exclusively to white people. You know, this is despite the fact that a Cambridge economics professor has warned the sheer scale of immigration has caused problems for the UK's infrastructure, which was largely built in the '70s. But you know what? None of that really bothers me.
What really bothers me is Frankie Boyle's attempt to make British people feel ashamed of Britain's involvement in the slave trade.
That really gets my goat because Britain's involvement in the slave trade is one of the most proud accomplishments of British history. And I know what you're thinking, "Oh my goodness, slavery is bad." And that's correct.
>> Of course.
>> Which is why the British ended it.
Everyone. If we just take That I did not know.
The British ended slavery? That I did not know, man. Like I said, there's a lot of things they don't teach you in these books, bro.
A lot of these kids today ain't learning this in school. A lot of kids when I was coming up weren't learning this 20 over 20-some years ago.
Promise you they wasn't. a cursory look at the subject, you can see how it is not nearly as cut and dried as Frankie makes it out to be. Even the very word slave comes from Slav because of the sheer number of Slavs taken as slaves by conquering peoples. But Frankie is trying to drum up white guilt. So let's talk about African slavery. The Portuguese were the first Europeans to start exploring the West African coast and they did indeed capture African natives to be brought back to Portugal as items of curiosity. Europeans who traveled to Western Africa discovered that Western Africa had civilizations of its own. For example, a Dutch visitor to Benin City wrote in around 1600, "As you enter it, the town appears very great.
You go into a great broad street, not paved, which seems to be seven or eight times broader than the Warmoesstraat in Amsterdam."
The houses in this town stand in good order, one close and even with the other as the houses in Holland stand.
More than a century earlier, Benin exchanged ambassadors with Portugal. The Portuguese did take a few Africans back to Europe, but they didn't need to set up operations because they discovered that there were already thriving slave trades in Africa. And so they bought slaves from African rulers and traders.
The vast majority of slaves taken out of Africa were sold by African rulers, traders, and military aristocracy who grew wealthy in business. Most slaves were acquired through wars or by kidnapping. And before you start saying this is excessively barbaric, I'm glad I started tapping into learn more about the history of everything that we didn't get the chance to learn in school, man. Now we got everything, you got encyclopedias, you got everything in the books, the libraries, all the internet. The internet is a prime example on where you can get all this information from. A lot of it is misinformed information. A lot of it is pretty accurate. And it's just good that we have these sources that we can learn stuff that we didn't get a chance to learn growing up or that we was told lies to. You know what I'm saying?
This was the standard for almost every civilized society all across the world.
For example, in ancient Greece, Strabo tells us that the island of Delos trafficked in 10,000 slaves.
>> Damn. a day. A day?
>> Even before the Roman Empire. Even when we're coming to the end of Roman Republic in the 1st century BC, it's estimated that a third of Italy was made up of slaves.
>> Slaves. Damn.
>> Slaves made up of people whom the Romans had conquered and taken back to Italy to do hard labor.
And so to anyone even slightly educated on the subject, it is absolutely unsurprising to find that for example, in 1510, the capital of the Empire of Songhay was teeming with slaves. Slave trading in West Africa was common, but it was different to what you expect. It wasn't for commercial purposes. It was to show status and to give the wealthy African elite a comfortable life.
>> Mhm. And with the appearance of Europeans desperate to buy slaves for use in the Americas, the character of African slave ownership changed. Indeed, [clears throat] it did. The character of slavery on the west coast of Africa changed to look a lot more like the character of slavery on the east coast of Africa. Because we're going to talk about the Arab slave trade.
Specifically, the circumstance of Swahili-speaking peoples.
Unsurprisingly, the Arabs being far closer to sub-Saharan Africa than the Europeans, >> Mhm. they've been taking advantage of it for far longer. They were people with as much commercial nous as anyone else. The ruling class of coastal Swahili society, sultans, government officials, and wealthy merchants used non-Muslim slaves as domestic servants and to work on farms and estates. And they even had plantations such as the Omani Sultan Sayyid Said, who became immensely rich when he started up clove plantations in the 1820s with slave labor. Arab Muslims settled along the coast and intermixed with the locals, forming a people and culture known as Swahili, which started in around the 10th century AD. So, [clears throat] unsurprisingly, the East Africa slave trade was well established long before Europeans arrived on the scene and was driven by demands for labor by the Sultanates of the Middle East. You might be thinking, "Well, that's interesting. If the Arabs had been in Africa for about a thousand years >> Right. taking sub-Saharan African slaves, why isn't there a very large population of black people in Arabia?" Right. And the answer to that is that the Arabs used to castrate them.
[ __ ] and balls entirely. A practice that was supposed to >> Woah.
They had their their their lower extremities amputated? Damn, man.
Between the ages of 8 and 12 years old, bro. Yo, man.
That's [ __ ] crazy, bro. Bled to death, high price brought by eunuchs. I can't pronounce that. On the market made the practice profitable.
They were castrated in the Middle East. Damn.
It ended in 1962 when slavery was finally outlawed in places like Saudi Arabia. This, of course, does not mean that the trade has actually stopped. It is still going on today.
>> That's insane.
>> know exactly [clears throat] how many slaves the Arabs took from sub-Saharan Africa on the East Coast. But, one historian produced a total of 17 >> 17 million? [ __ ] >> I doubt it was that high. Again, we can't know. And it was for over a thousand years that this was happening.
>> Right. The point is that slavery was ubiquitous. No matter where on Earth you traveled, you found slaves. In Europe, in China, in the Middle East, in the New World, in India, in Scandinavia, >> Wow. in Africa. Slavery was as common an institution as animal husbandry. The only thing that separated the Christian nations of Western Europe from anyone else on Earth was the efficiency with which they could transport taken slaves.
Damn. [clears throat] And it should come as no surprise that this was made possible by advances in technology that the rest of the world simply didn't have. The most common number I could find regarding the total number of slaves taken from Africa by Europeans was 11 >> 11 million. And that is in about 400 year time span. Portugal took the most slaves with over 4 and 1/2 million transported to the New World. Then Britain with over 2 and 1/2 million, then Spain and France totaling just under 3 million. And just [clears throat] so no one is under any illusions, the transatlantic slave trade must have been close to hell on Earth.
I'm [clears throat] sure, bro.
>> from Africa and packed into conditions so disgraceful and disgusting, it is unsurprising that there was such a high mortality rate for the crossing.
>> Yes. As offensive as this is to look at, we have to remember that this is a consequence of dehumanization.
Yeah, it's Slaves were not people, they were chattel. It will obviously come as absolutely no surprise that the driving motivation behind slavery was economic.
Portuguese merchants traded with Africans from trading posts they set up along the coast. They exchanged items like brass and copper bracelets for such products as pepper, cloth, beads, and slaves, all part of an existing internal African trade. But [clears throat] the transatlantic slave trade really took off when Christopher Columbus discovered the New World. The Portuguese initially had a monopoly on the slave trade, but this was broken in the 16th century when England, followed by France and other European nations, entered the trade.
Unsurprisingly, this was a massively profitable trade for everyone involved except the slaves. Africa's rulers, traders, and the military aristocracy protected their interest in the slave trade. They discouraged Europeans from leaving the coastal areas to venture to the interior of the continent.
European trading companies realized the benefit of dealing with African suppliers and not unnecessarily antagonizing them. The companies could not have mustered the resources it would have taken to directly capture the tens of millions of people shipped out of Africa. It was far more sensible and safer to give Africans guns to fight in the many wars that yielded captives for trade. Mhm. The slave trading [clears throat] network stretched deep into Africa's interior. Slave trading firms were aware of their dependency on African suppliers, and these African suppliers were making insane amounts of money. For example, the king of Benin >> [clears throat] >> was making 250,000 lb a year selling people into slavery in 1750.
>> is wild, man.
>> successor said We We just a prop We were just We're >> [clears throat] >> Oh, [ __ ] man.
250,000 250,000 lb. I want to I want to know how much that in in US dollars, bro.
Selling these people into slavery, G.
Damn. 240s, that he would do anything the British wanted him to do apart from giving up the slave trade. Quote, "The slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and the glory of their wealth. The mother lulls the child to sleep with notes of triumph over an enemy reduced to slavery.
With an industry so profitable to so many people involved and so widespread as to be common to almost every nation on Earth, why would the British want King Gezo to give up the slave trade? Well, we need to turn back the clock to 1066 and the Battle of Hastings, when a French-speaking Duke of Viking descent called William the Bastard William the Bastard.
>> Godwinson of England. William the Bastard was refashioned as William the Conqueror and took the crown of England.
And one of the first things he did as King of England was to have the entire country inventoried. This record was known as the Domesday Book and we still have it. Thanks to this hard work, we know that around 1086, 10% of the recorded population of England was slaves. 20 years earlier, when he'd first conquered England, William had enacted a series of laws, Mhm.
>> one of which prohibited the slave trade out of England.
"I prohibit the sale of a man by another outside of the country on pain of a fine paid in full to me." We I what William's motivation for making this law was, but given that the punishment for breaking it was a fine, That he That he gets That he collects. He collects that.
>> Whatever his reasons, within a generation of 1086, slavery had almost died out in England. Presumably because William the Conqueror had outlawed the trade of slaves. There appears to also have been a trend for lords to endow their slaves to perform their plowing functions as free plowmen. While not a wonderful state of affairs, serfdom is better than chattel slavery. And this state of affairs was solidified by the church at the Synod of Westminster in 1102, where the church denounced simony, clerical marriages, and slavery. This made England a very unique case. There probably wasn't another country in the world at this time that had outlawed slavery. There were practically no motivations to do so. It was incredibly lucrative, endemic to the point of normalcy, so it wasn't even viewed as immoral, and the chances are William the Conqueror himself made the slave trade in England illegal just so he could make a quick buck. Yeah. Fast forward 700 years, and the international transatlantic slave trade is in full swing.
And yet we still do not have slaves in England. And this is where we meet a man named Granville Sharp, a very well-educated rationalist thinker of the Enlightenment, Boy, if they used to not some some some some credible sources from Wikipedia, bro. They always used to tell us not to even look into this, but Wikipedia be having some credible information, bro. Like for real.
who became an active campaigner for the abolition of the slave trade. Granville had had previous legal success defending Jonathan Strong from his erstwhile slave master after being brought to England from the colonies. But we're going to look at the subsequent Somerset case.
James Somerset was a slave from Virginia in America who had come to England with his master Charles Stuart in 1769 and had run away in October 1771.
After evading slave hunters employed by Stuart for 56 days, Somerset had been caught, put onto the slave ship Ann and Mary to be taken to Jamaica and sold.
>> Mhm. Three [clears throat] Londoners had applied to Lord Mansfield for a writ of habeas corpus which had been granted with Somerset having to appear in a hearing on the 24th of January 1772.
Members of the public responded to the plight by sending money to pay for his lawyers who in any event gave their services pro bono publico. While Stuart's costs were met by the West Indian planters and merchants. Given his prior legal experience with the Jonathan Strong case, Sharp briefed Somerset's lawyers.
The judgment was delivered on the 22nd of June 1772 and it was a clear victory for Somerset, Sharp, and the lawyers who had acted for Somerset. Mansfield acknowledged that English law did not allow slavery and only a new act of Parliament could bring it into legality.
Mhm. The verdict established one thing very clearly. A slave becomes free the moment he sets foot on English soil.
>> Fire.
>> This was, according to Lord Mansfield, that the air of England is too pure for any slave to breathe. No matter what reason William the Conqueror had Lord slavery for. By the time this judgment was drawn by Lord Mansfield, it had become a point of principle. This precedent wasn't set for Mansfield's personal interests. This precedent was set to determine right from wrong.
Granville Sharp went on to co-found the Society for >> The moment you step foot on England, bro, you're free.
You're free, bro.
That's fire, man.
Dope. think the abolition of the slave trade with fellow like-minded enlightenment thinkers. And after 20 long years of campaigning in Parliament, which I won't detail here, they were successful in their goal of abolishing the international slave trade in 1807.
Now, if you know anything about 1807, you'll know that this was during the War of the Fourth Coalition, where Napoleon Bonaparte was ravaging great powers all across the European continent. The Napoleonic Wars led to new territorial acquisitions for Britain and helped stuff Parliament with more abolitionists than they had before, which is why the bill providing for the abolition of the slave trade to conquered territories triumphantly passed in both houses. And the following year, this was superseded by a stronger measure that outlawed the British Atlantic slave trade altogether.
But, given the raging war in Europe, it was rather difficult to enforce due to a paucity of available resources. After 1807, the Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, having achieved its goals, became the African Institution, whose principal aim was to ensure the new legislation was enforced and that other countries followed Britain's example.
>> Yep. Persuading other countries to join Britain outlawing the slave trade proved more difficult.
>> I'm sure it did.
>> Despite the efforts of the African Institution and those of British ministers, the Congresses of Paris and Vienna in 1814 and 1815 both failed to reach a specific agreement. Given that this was at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, it's hardly surprising that there was French opposition. Where diplomacy had failed, the Royal Navy had to succeed. It's one thing declaring a writ that people may no longer profit from the trading of human beings.
>> Right. It's another thing They want no war with them because they Now I can't get paid off this [ __ ] enforce that.
Enter the West African Squadron. The West Africa Squadron was a detachment of the Royal Navy that was given the task of blockading Africa, the continent, to make sure that slave traders were not taking slaves to the Americas. Needless to say, in 1807 there was only a token force performing this operation, comprising of two ships. This number was increased to five ships until the war of 1812 with the United States. But after 1815 with Britain victorious in Europe and supreme sea, the Royal Navy turned its attention back to the challenge. The institution of slavery was formally abolished in the British Empire in 1833.
And by the 1850s, around 25 vessels and 2,000 officers and men were on the station, supported by nearly a thousand crewmen. Experienced fishermen recruited as sailors from what is now the coast of modern >> Y'all probably wondering why I'm not really saying much in this video. I mean, I am, but you know, just just paying attention and pausing and reading. You know what I'm saying? Just focusing on on what is being said that I've never heard like in schools and none of that. Like I said, when growing up in school, hearing this type of stuff, you ain't really had that much interest cuz, you know, you're young.
You Your attention span isn't all the way there, but as you're older and you have to be more aware of what's going on in this world or your history.
Yeah, so that's why I'm just soaking in all this information and to learn that Brit the British is Britain is is responsible for ending slavery is is wild. Like there, yeah. It's worth noting that this was not a pleasant job, and the mortality rate was five times higher for compared to fleets in the Mediterranean or in home waters.
To help incentivize the crew, money was actually given to each crew per slave that they freed.
But there was a real zeitgeist in Britain for the abolition of slavery.
For example, the pursuit and capture of slave ships became celebrated naval engagements, widely reported back in peacetime Britain, they became a source of national pride. So, it's no wonder that many of the crews really did have an evangelical zeal about the anti-slavery patrolling.
However, I don't want to give the impression that this was all for humanitarian reasons. There's no doubt that Britain, in her foreign policy, used her anti-slavery laws as a stick with which to beat her opponents, primarily the Spaniards and the Portuguese, who refused to conform to these demands.
Britain demanded Spain, Portugal, and the very new nation of Brazil to declare slave trading to be piracy. And while these nations paid lip service to these principles, they failed to enforce them, which led to a British blockade of Brazil by 1850, which, of course, forced the nascent Brazilian Empire to capitulate. And it didn't end there.
In the 1860s, David Livingstone reports of Arab atrocities against enslaved Africans stirred up the interest of the British public, reviving the flagging abolitionist movement. Throughout the 1870s, the Navy attempted to suppress this abominable Eastern trade at Zanzibar in particular. Needless to [clears throat] say, the British Navy continued their mission against the slavers across the Indian Ocean. The abolition of slavery became the British project. It captured the hearts and minds of the entire country, from the highest lord to the lowest peasant. This is certainly how the British saw it.
For example, the spirit of chivalry was acts of heroism and self-sacrifice in fights against the slave trade.
Alfred Tennyson, the unweary, unostentatious, and inglorious crusade of England against slavery may probably be regarded as among the three or four perfectly virtuous pages comprised in the history of nations, William Lecky. All of this was done against the vested financial interests of hundreds of thousands of people. Entire nations were against the idea of abolishing slavery and the slave trade. Shout out to Shout out to until Britain made it happen. Right.
>> In the 19th century, if you saw a ship bearing down on you flying this flag and you were a slave trader, you knew that this flag stood for liberty. This was the flag of a nation that defied human convention for a point of principle and spent its blood, sweat, tears, and treasure to enforce it on the world.
This is the flag of a nation that accepted the absolute moral truth Mhm.
[clears throat] that slavery is wrong.
No matter what riches No matter No matter what power can be gained, no matter the cost. Slavery had to be abolished.
>> Abolished. That was the British crusade.
>> Shout out to Britain.
>> held the reins of world power, that is what she did with it. So, Frankie, to be honest with you, when you say we have streets named after slave owners, we have profited from a vile crime and feel no shame. It is British [clears throat] people that don't learn languages or British history.
Britain is the true scrounger, the true criminal.
Well, I have [snorts] to concur.
British people, apparently, do not learn British history because Britain's involvement in the slave trade is one of the most proud moments any nation could have had >> Mhm. in [clears throat] their history.
I want to make one thing crystal clear, Frankie.
You live in a world without slavery because of Britain.
That's why we don't have it. You You say all that [ __ ] but you we we don't have these things because of Britain, man.
Yo, I have a newfound respect for my people out there in Britain. I appreciate You know what I mean? Shout out to y'all, man. You know what I'm saying? So, I be Why I be tapped in reacting to videos? Y'all do be chiming in in the comments. I appreciate y'all as well. Shout out to all my all my people in Britain, man. The fact that you guys are held responsible for stopping slavery, you know what I'm saying, is something to be proud of.
[music] One of the greatest rewards, you know what I'm saying? And I'm pretty sure y'all went through hell and hell and high water to make that a thing. A lot of people was not on board with it because they realized the money they was going to lose out. It's crazy, [music] bro. So, shout out to Britain, man. They It's like I said, these are the things you don't learn in history books or you didn't pay attention to. But, as we're older now, we It's It's It's our responsibility to do our own research and learn about our history so we can teach it to the kids who are coming up behind us, you know what I'm saying? The other The next generation. Learn about these things, man, cuz a lot of these things are not going to be told in in history books and classrooms, man.
[music] You have to go and do the research yourself. So, shout out to all my people out there to recommend I tap in with this video, man. I appreciate it, man.
Very, very informative, very educational, man. And I I I enjoyed the information that was [music] being delivered. And yeah, man, I advise people to just know your history and follow up on things that we didn't get to learn in school. So, shout out to all my peoples.
But, [music] yo, I hope you enjoyed the reaction to this video. If you enjoyed my reaction, please give me a thumbs up.
Subscribe to the Dope Guy Bet Dog. Hit the notification bell whenever I upload.
Follow me on Snapchat and Instagram right across the bottom screen. Any of the videos you may check out, please comment in this video, my other videos.
Leave nice comments on all my videos to help grow the channel, help with the algorithm for sure.
Any other videos you may check out please leave a comment in the comment section below. Now I got you. I'm going to spin the block. But yeah, man, this the dope guy and I am out. Yes, sir.
Related Videos
Black History: Why America Must Confront Its Past'' #blackhistory #america #shorts
Blackworldblackhistory
29K views•2026-05-30
#SeamansAct1915 #MaritimeHistory #LifeAtSea #BoatShitCrazyX #SaferWorkEnvironment
BoatShitCrazyX
859 views•2026-06-01
They Said Flight Was Impossible—Then Two Bicycle Mechanics Changed Everything#wrightbrothers
umars997
526 views•2026-05-30
Black Women Were Banned From White Suffrage Groups
Peoplediduknow
782 views•2026-05-31
A Volcano Created Frankenstein — And Killed Summer for a Year
TheDarkSideOfSmth
389 views•2026-05-29
Born into slavery in Beaufort
RoadsanRoots
613 views•2026-05-31
50.32 Judah And Israel Split / Jeroboam's False Religion - 2 Chronicles ch. 10-11
smyrnachristianchurchkokomo
107 views•2026-05-29
Iran's Secret Society Wrote the Constitution — Then Got Hanged for It
TheShadowLecture
502 views•2026-05-29











