This video provides a lucid, data-driven breakdown of how climate change shifts statistical probabilities from rare anomalies to frequent realities. It effectively bridges the gap between complex climate modeling and public understanding without sacrificing scientific rigor.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Climate Scientists Say The Dice Are Loaded. Here's Why
Added:Well, it’s summertime here in the northern hemisphere folks, and that means the usual round of unqualified rhetoric from both sides of what some people refer to as a debate about the global climate. On the one hand you have the extreme doomers who latch onto every heatwave as a portent of a dystopian Mad Max style future, and vindication of everything they’ve been warning us about for years. On the other hand, you’ve got the climate sceptics and, dare I say it in this day and age, even still a few climate DENIERS, who helpfully point out that the seasons are a perfectly natural aspect of life on earth and that the weather always gets hot in the Summer and we should all stop being so woke and just calm down and get real.
And as usual somewhere in the middle of that cacophony of online social media noise, the actual scientists are holding their little hands up and offering to provide a data driven assessment based on empirical evidence and sophisticated climate modelling…and generally speaking getting completely drowned out by all the other more contentious and more exciting content doing the rounds. So, let’ see if we can tease that science out from all the bluster and blow and have a little look at it.
Hello and welcome to Just Have a Think. I think we’ll start here in good old blighty.
Now for those who don’t live in the UK, we have this very famous yard stick by which, for the last fifty years, we’ve been sort of gauging our warmer summers. That yard stick was the summer of nineteen seventy-six. I remember it well. I remember a wonderful family vacation in Cornwall and hoping the lovely hot weather would never end. It was undoubtedly a freak summer, with temperatures nudging up to thirty degrees Celsius, or eighty-six Fahrenheit where we were, which was a temperature that, at the age of seven, I didn’t even know existed!
In fact, the town of Cheltenham achieved a high of thirty-five point-nine Celsius or nearly ninety-seven degrees Fahrenheit that year. It was all very exotic for our windy little island.
Anyway, the point is, since that summer, and particularly in recent years, whenever we’ve had a heatwave here in Britain, the sceptical types have always said “well, it’s no different to nineteen-seventy-six. These freak summers come along every now and then. It’s perfectly normal.”
In fact, if you look at these two heat maps, you might reasonably agree with that assessment.
They’re available on the climate lab book website, produced by Professor Ed Hawkins, who is a climate scientist at the University of Reading, best known for creating the iconic "climate stripes" graphic that visualises the long-term warming of the planet using a simple sequence of coloured bands. The colours in these maps show the average temperature relative to the nineteen-sixty-one to nineteen-ninety average. White is neutral, blues are colder than the average and reds are warmer than the average, with darker reds being significantly warmer than average. So, if you only looked at these maps, you might be forgiven for thinking the UK was actually cooler in twenty-four than it was in nineteen-seventy-six. But then Ed zooms out a bit to look at the same two years across Europe. What that shows us is that there really was a bit of a freak weather system sitting on top of the UK in seventy-six that was affecting only a small part of the rest of the continent. By contrast, in twenty-twenty-four, the continental land mass was sweltering while we only got a small taste of the heat in the south-east of our country. But for my money, you only really get the real perspective on the nineteen-seventy-six UK heatwave when you zoom fully out to have a look at the entire planet. What this tells us is that the overwhelming majority of the planet was close to or below the nineteen-sixty-one to nineteen-ninety average back then. You can barely see our little heatwave in the UK.
It was really nothing more than a statistical anomaly. Now compare that to the global map in twenty-twenty-four. That’s not a localised freak weather event. That’s an entire planet that is warmer or much warmer than the baseline period. But, again, you can’t judge the whole picture just by one season of one year, can you? Quite right. You can’t.
So, let’s try some analysis from the World Weather Attribution website.
They found that the record temperatures Britain has experienced in the last few weeks would have been extremely unlikely in the climate of the 1970s. They calculated that similar meteorological conditions back then would have resulted in daytime temperatures about three-point-five degrees Celsius cooler than those we’ve seen this year.
Why? Well because the entire global climate system is carrying more heat energy now than it was back then, so when a heatwave does come along, it packs a bigger punch.
It’s also worth noting that Europe is warming up twice as fast as the global average. Zero-point-five-six degrees Celsius per decade to be precise.
Again why? Well, Europe is a big old land mass, and land heats up much more quickly than water. Continental Europe just doesn’t get the benefit of ocean heat absorption in the way that other parts of the world do. Plus, northern Europe is connected the fastest warming region on earth – the Arctic, which thanks to Sea Ice loss and the feedback loop of reducing albedo or reflectiveness, is now warming at about zero-point seven-five degrees Celsius per decade, which is THREE times the global average. Europe has also done a great job of clearing up its air pollution in recent decades. But removing those particulates means removing some of the reflective aerosols that had previously masked part of the greenhouse warming.
Plus, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, Europe has also experienced changes in large-scale weather patterns that favour stronger blocking high-pressure systems, longer-lasting heat domes, more hot air transported north from North Africa and fewer cooling Atlantic weather systems during summer. Those patterns don't create global warming, but they do make European summers much more prone to prolonged heatwaves.
We also have drying soils on this continent, which means much less incoming solar radiation gets used for evaporation. Instead, more energy goes directly into heating the ground and the air. That creates a feedback loop. Hotter weather dries the soil. Dry soils make subsequent hot weather even hotter and therefore heatwaves become more and more intense.
The famous US climate scientist James Hansen calls it “loading the heat dice”.
It’s a phrase that was illustrated beautifully by John Lang, a UCL graduate in Earth Science, Trade Law and Environmental Policy and the founder of an education program called Climate Trunk.
So, each of these grey squares represents a year, and we’ve got a hundred of them here, so that ‘s a century. So far so good. Using historical data, we can plot how often a once in fifty-year heatwave happened in pre-industrial times, which is the baseline for this graphic.
Clearly, back then a once in fifty-year heatwave would happen twice in a century. So, let’s fill in a couple of squares in red to represent that. Lovely.
Now let’s see what happens at an average global surface temperature of one-point-five degrees Celsius above those pre-industrial times, which is roughly where we’re at today. It’s quite a lot more heatwaves, don’t you think? In fact, at current temperatures a once in fifty-year heatwave will statistically occur SEVENTEEN times during the course of a century.
You probably don’t need me to tell you that heatwaves cause major damage to infrastructure, productivity and human health, so a reasonable person would surely say we want to avoid nudging ourselves up to TWO degrees above pre-industrial times.
But according to a twenty-twenty-five study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, our current trajectory gives us a twenty percent probability of reaching that level as early as twenty-forty-seven and an EIGHTY percent chance of reaching it by twenty-sixty-nine.
At that temperature level we’re looking at twenty-eight ‘once-in-fifty-year’ heatwaves in a typical century. That’s more than one every four years, which leaves precious little time to recover and rebuild from one heatwave before getting clobbered by another one.
The recent so-called Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 paper that we looked at in a recent video, revises the existing IPCC scenarios down a bit, to take account of the progress made on emissions reductions since those scenarios were first published more than fifteen years ago. Nevertheless, the draft CMIP7 scenario framework suggests that under its central emissions pathway, global temperatures could approach four degrees Celsius sometime during the second half of the next century. Now, at that level, what we used to call a once in fifty-year heatwave would be more or less a normal year. And what would be called a heatwave then would be absolutely unthinkable today.
Of course, you folks in the United States have also been experiencing your own heat dome in recent weeks, so you’re not in the clear by any means. And although it’s wintertime down under, Australia’s climate is becoming ever more brutal as each year goes by. So, we really do have a global problem here. The folks at Bloomberg published their own analysis very recently, providing us with some quite sobering statistics.
They point out that September twenty-twenty-three was 8:56 half a degree Celsius hotter than the previous September record. Apparently, that’s “the biggest such margin ever and extreme even for an El Niño year.” The rate of temperature change has increased in recent years too, which is something we looked at in a recent video.
Earth’s energy imbalance, which is the gap between incoming energy and heat radiated back out to space, has roughly doubled over the past two decades.
“There were four times as many new heat records set from 2016 to 2024 as there would have been without climate change” says the analysis Physics tells us that for every degree Celsius of warming, our atmosphere can hold onto seven percent more moisture.
As a result, record rainfall levels are happening forty percent more often than they would without our current warming, while record dry spells are hitting us ten percent more often.
Melted ice sliding off of land masses now accounts for more than half of observed sea-level rise and the rate of ice loss observed during 2006–2025 was more than twice that measured during 1976–1990.
Thermal expansion is doing the rest of the job as our oceans reach levels of warming never before recorded, which by the way is completely disrupting the geographical habitats and migration patterns of all sorts of marine life, not to mention killing off a good chunk of essential coral ecosystems. And of course, the warmer seas are nibbling away at the floating ice shelves that buttress the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, which was the subject of another recent video on this channel.
I’m not going to prattle on about all the consequences of these changes. I’ve made countless videos about that in the past. Suffice to say, none of those consequences is good.
In fact, I’m not going to waste your time with any kind of concluding remarks at all. If you can’t see the blindingly obvious with your own eyes, then I’m afraid I can’t help you.
By all means leave your thoughts in the comments section below and as always, I will read as many of them as time allows. That’ll do us though. I couldn’t make any of these videos without the monthly support of very generous individuals who support me on a monthly basis over on the Patreon platform, so a massive shout out to those fantastic people who also enable me to keep ads and sponsorship messages out of your way.
Do give us a like and subscribe if you want to see more content like this. And most important of all, thanks very much for watching. Have a great week if you can.
And remember to Just Have a Think. See you next week,
Related Videos

Why the Arctic Warms Faster: new science—Interview w/Dr. Malte Stuecker—Radio Ecoshock 2019-01-31
StopFossilFuels
269 views•2019-02-16

What's in a watt?
AlliantEnergyVideo
13K views•2019-01-24

The Newest Form of Water Is Hot and Black, Wait What?
Seeker
266K views•2019-06-03

Demystifying Electromagnetic Braking: How It Slows Things Down
iitutorcom
6K views•2019-03-23

How to Make a Free Energy Water Wheel - Science Project Without Electricity
LXDESIGN
2019K views•2025-07-19

Physics behind a Tuned Mass System
StructuralMadness
21K views•2019-01-11

Bubbles: A rainy day science experiment
WDIONews
2K views•2025-03-16

Earth's Magnetic Field Suddenly SHIFTS - What's REALLY Going On?
ForumIASOfficial
729 views•2025-08-26
Trending

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23

Bitcoin Social Interest: Dozens of us Left
benjaminjcowen
12K views•2026-07-23

Tesla Profits Plunge & SpaceX Stock Continues Fall
TheJohnJohnstonLounge
6K views•2026-07-23