Dr. Blitz provides a necessary defense of empirical reality, though it is a sobering reminder that basic scientific facts still require such rigorous protection. The clarity of the evidence is commendable, even if the debate itself feels like an intellectual mismatch.
Instala nuestra extensión para buscar dentro de cualquier video al instante
FLERFS vs. SCIENCE - Debate Dr. Blitz [5/18/2026] [H]Añadido:
Here's to hoping that it works.
So, we did kick up the bit rate. So, hopefully the connection is way better.
I hope my connection can handle it.
Those of you who are watching on Tik Tok, I think that you're the Tik Tok or Twitch, I think that you guys are the ones that will see the effect. So, let me know how it sound how how it sounds, how it looks. Hopefully, it's clearer.
Hopefully, it doesn't lag as much.
Howdy. out of you.
All right, move this over here. Uh, probably here is fine to be honest.
M, what are you doing?
Happy FL. Happy Flur Day indeed.
Was it ever alive?
It's a good question.
Um, yeah. So, welcome everybody. Hope everybody's having a good time.
Let some people trickle in. We'll get some conversations going in the near future.
Oh, I forgot to tighten my glasses. My glasses always feel so loose.
Like if I shake my head, I feel like it's going to be like it's gonna like just pop off. See? Like I feel like I'm Ryan Gosling in Project Hail Mary, right? This is like the glasses just constantly falling off my face. And now I can't see.
Got to clean the uh monopocals.
Okay, Mario. There we go.
By the way, before we get started, I do want to shout out someone.
I want to shout out Lucy. Uh Lucy is the mom of a viewer who regularly watches and she's been having a tough time. So, Lucy, I understand that things have been hard, especially with what happened recently. Um, but I hope things go okay and you know I hope that my live streams can bring you at least a little bit of joy especially given you know the tough aspects of life right so I wish you the best of luck and you know keep enjoying the show now before we continue with that yeah everybody let's send some positive vibes to vibes to Lucy.
Um, let's get that in the chat. Now, before we get started, we do have to wait for some people to join the chat. But in the meantime, I guess I should probably answer some questions. Namely, um, these are not bif focals, these are monopocals.
They're only the one lens, the one prescription. Um, also I can't wear contacts. Um, when I was a kid, I was like 16 or something. I was wearing contacts. I tried them and uh I made the mistake of sleeping with them in and something happened. I got some sort of eye infection or they my eyes got super dry.
I literally couldn't my eyes became so sensitive to light as a result of sleeping in them for one night. Um, I literally couldn't open my eyes in a pitch black room. I had to cover the windows with blankets, turn off all the lights, and just sit there all day because it the bright light hurt my eyes too much. And in fact, I still like as a result, I still have issues with extremely bright lights. Um, which is tough considering the state that I live in. So, I can't wear contacts anymore, unfortunately.
You spoken to Angel again recently or is he still losing it? I haven't spoken to Angel in a while.
Commander standard. I play I I play Commander.
That's That's what I do. You going to play Subnotica, too? Absolutely. Whether or not I'll do it on stream is a different story. You seem like someone with a weakness to light. That's true. I do. I do have a weakness to light. Um, why would I go outside when all the fun stuff is on the computer?
All right. Well, so we'll let some people trickle in again. We still we we've only been live for a few minutes.
Um, and we'll get some debates in here eventually. I promise. Oh, there we go. Speak of the devils.
Oh. Uh, let me just do a thing really quick.
Okay, we should be good there. All right, let's bring up some guests.
Let's talk to J Dr. John.
>> Hey, good afternoon, >> Dr. John. How's it going?
>> Hey, life is a blessing. Um, so I'm here because I disagree with your uh prompt.
>> Okay. What shape do you think the Earth is?
>> So, the Earth is actually symmetrical, right? It's uh >> Well, I think both of us are both of us think that the Earth is symmetrical. I'm asking what shape you think it is.
>> But it sits on a dimensional plane. It sits on a two-dimensional plane.
>> So >> from one point to >> So I'm asking like what shape is the thing that we walk around on.
>> So the earth and I've answered your question yet again. Um the earth is flat.
>> Okay.
>> But it's not flat to a degree where you where you're specifying. It does have like >> mountains and hills and things of that nature. But >> I I know I know that flat earthers don't think that I know that flat earthers think that they're mountains. I know.
>> From point A to point B, um there's just a straight line across. There's no >> curve. There's no 360. None of that stuff you like to say on here. Um so >> because of this, >> how do I know?
>> No. Why do you think so?
>> So the reason I know this and it's been proven based on biblical texts.
Um the biblical text proved it. How does that work?
>> So do you are you a religious man by chance? I'm not.
>> So it won't me I won't be able to essentially speak to you in a way with that degree. So are you atheist?
>> Uh sure.
>> All right. Perfect. B I can explain to you this way. When you go outside, you watch the sun uh rotate around this circle that we live on. Um essentially what you see or what you be able to let go about is this.
Johnny, are you a are you a J? What >> are you a Jew?
>> That's a strange question to ask on this topic.
>> I'm looking at your features, your hair color, and your nose. Are you a Jew?
>> I'm looking at your features, your hair color, and your nose. Are you a alien?
>> I'm a I'm a black. Are you a Jew?
>> Why would you say that you're a black?
What a [ __ ] weirdo. Anyway, so let's talk about the shape of the earth.
>> You were saying something about sunsets, right? You were saying something about sunsets. So, when the sun goes around, >> you feel like it goes around a circle.
The reason why I'm asking you that question because you know the earth is flat. You guys pray to pray to a flat earth.
>> I'm an atheist, bro.
>> No, you're definitely Jew by blood. You guys create things like other deceptive deceptive products that you guys have released >> the world to trick the people.
>> And the fact that you guys >> I wish I was part of such a lovely and illustrious group. If you are >> they're boosting your platform, not because you're anything special. Look, let's tell the truth.
>> So, wait a minute, Dr. John. Dr. John, instead of instead of switching on your uh like your Nazi, instead of switching on like your Nazi helmet, why don't you just tell me why you think the earth is flat? Why? Why don't you just tell me why you think the earth is flat?
>> You know, the earth isn't flat. And the reason that you're up here today, instead of just asserting that I know something, instead of trying to read my mind agenda as a Jewish man, >> all right, I need to I need to meet you for a second. Instead of trying to read my mind, why don't you just explain to me what evidence you think that there is for the earth being flat. How about that?
>> You can unmute yourself.
>> So you So you basically mute people who start to expose you, huh?
>> Well, no. I was trying to say something and you wouldn't let me finish a sentence, so I had to mute you so that I could finish a sentence. Now, if you'd like to answer my question, that'd be great.
>> It's all right, man. You got it. This is propaganda. So, what is the Oh, he left.
What a coward.
What a coward and a shameful person.
Couldn't even last 3 minutes without spitting out anti-semitic stuff.
It's not great. Oh, hey, it's the neither fangist.
Neoliarian philangist. How's it going?
Oh, >> it's going pretty good.
Glad to hear it. What shape do you think the earth is? Neo libertarian flangist.
>> Uh, I think the earth is a flat. It's pretty obvious.
>> Okay. Why do you think the earth is flat?
>> Well, because if I walk in a straight line for like um five miles, I won't feel any curvature.
>> Okay. Why would that mean that it's flat?
>> Well, let's say Well, imagine like a really really big ball. Let's say you walk on that. You're on that ball walking. Eventually, you'd slip off and fall off and hurt your head. That doesn't happen with the Earth.
>> Oh, I see.
If you walk on a ball, then you're going to fall off the ball.
>> Yes, obviously.
>> And hurt your head.
>> That's how physics works. Yeah, that's how physics works.
>> Well, you've converted me. I'm a flat earther now. Obviously, he's a troll. He shows up on Parker's lives a lot.
All right, let's talk to so broke.
So broke, how's it going?
So broke, you there broke, can you hear me?
So, broke.
Hello.
Well, this is good timing anyway because I have to fix this. I can see you. I can't hear you.
If you're trying to use your like maybe your maybe your mic is muffled or something, but I can see you. I just can't hear you. So, maybe get closer to your mic.
All right. So, so Brooke, I'm going to let you go. You can fix your mic and then we can talk next time. Um, all right. Let's read. We have Oh, we only have the one super chat. Let's just read that really quick. So, from Boogie to Cat with the $2, [ __ ] racism. I agree. [ __ ] racism. It's a shame that the like sometimes members of the black community engage in like anti-semitic conspiracy theories. It's It's really quite a shame.
All right, let's talk to uh to Wiktor.
Hello Victor, how's it going?
>> On behalf of the new libertarian philanist community, I'm >> Oh, no. Not the neo libertarian fascist or what? Flangist.
>> Fangist. Me personally, I'm an anaco fascist. Neo libertarian philangist communist.
>> Okay, >> that's that's beside the point.
>> It is it is indeed beside the point. All right, let's talk to Focha.
No. Now all of Parker's trolls are going to come here.
Nobody wanted this.
All right. Um, looks like VOKA is not connecting. So, let's disconnect them.
Let's talk to RX 105 Gundam.
RX 105 Gundam, how's it going?
>> What's up, Blitz? How you doing?
>> I'm doing all right. Gundam, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> I think it's round. I'm not here to debate you. I just want to say I uh I watch your stuff a lot and I've been seeing your diagnosis on your medical conditions and whatnot.
>> You should go watch the most upto-date one.
>> I will. I'm I I I hope you're doing well. And uh >> I am.
>> That's that's pretty much it. I listen to you debate really ignorant people on my free time while I'm working. So, I hope you have a good day, buddy. I'll do my best. Thanks for being here. I do appreciate that. I appreciate the glaze and I appreciate the well wishes. I am doing all right now. If you go watch my latest video, it turns out after they took it out about a month about two months ago now, they took out what we thought was a tumor. It turned out it wasn't cancer at all. Um it wasn't even a benign tumor. Uh it was basically masquerading as one. We have some super chats and we'll bring up our next guest from Ordinary Hea with the $5. Here's a second super chat. Rip Jeb. Yeah, Jeb always has it bad.
And from uh Linus Schroeder with the 10-year-old, hello from Bavaria. Could you ask them how they explain that it gets warmer the deeper you drill? What would happen if you drill all the way through? Excuse my English. They might think it's hell.
They might think it's literally hell.
Um, no, it wasn't a It wasn't a lipoma.
It was an abscess. All right, let's talk to David Zap.
David, how's it going?
>> Hello.
>> Hello.
>> Glad to hear it. David, uh, >> you know, concave Earth.
>> Sorry.
>> Concave Earth.
Inner Earth.
>> Yeah. What about it?
>> Yeah, that's it.
>> You think that the Earth is concave?
>> Yeah, we are inside the >> Why can't I Why doesn't the uh horizon curve up?
>> Hold on.
>> Why doesn't the horizon curve up? Like why can't I see Los Angeles when I look west like above me?
>> It's too far. And >> it's too far. What's What's What What makes it too far?
>> It's eight eight inches for a mile up.
>> Yeah. Okay. But so then I should be able to see distant cities by looking up.
>> Yeah. You can sometimes you see like the ships.
>> No, I'm talking about like why can't I see why can't I see like Los Angeles by looking up?
>> Because it's too far. It's not that far.
Los Angeles is only a few a few hundred miles away from me. And >> yeah, but but how far away is the sun?
>> We are blind to see.
>> Where is the sun?
>> Uh, it's in the center.
>> Okay. How far away is that?
>> About I don't know exactly. Let's say 4,000 miles.
>> So, I can see the sun, which is 4,000 mi away, but I can't see Los Angeles, which is 300 miles away. Make that make sense.
>> 300 miles? Yeah, it's different.
>> Yeah. So, why can't I see Los Angeles even though it's only 300 miles away?
>> Yeah, because our we are our eyes are blind to see.
>> So, then why can't I see the sun which is 4,000 miles away?
>> Yeah, but that Yeah. Okay. But the sun light is bending and yeah, the stars the star I'm sure the stars are also in the center. They are >> so why can I see the stars but I can't see Las Vegas or Los Angeles? They are in a ball of water, >> right? Why can I see the stars but I can't see Los Angeles?
>> Yeah, because three 300 miles already.
Yeah, I understand. But that's that's the light. The light traveling through here. That's that radium. That's energy.
You see energy.
>> I I understand that light has energy, >> but Los Angeles is closer to me than the stars are. But I can see the stars and I can't see Los Angeles.
>> Yeah, but yeah, you have to accept it and and then >> Why would I think it's true? It seems just obviously wrong.
>> No. Well, because >> I mean Yeah. Yeah, it does. Because if I could see the stars, which are not very bright, and they're 4,000 miles away, then I should be able to see Los Angeles, where the other stars live, which is only 300 miles away.
>> Yeah. Okay. Other stars. Yeah.
>> Well, yeah. I mean like you know Tom Hanks and >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
I I only I only can think about that you Yeah. It's that that's that's the stars are a different kind of color or different a different pro uh a different thrilling uh >> what >> a different different vibe of of life.
So when So in Los Angeles when they shoot those giant uh spotlights into the sky, >> why can't I see them?
>> Because Yeah, it's because it's >> they would they would be pointing they would be pointing at me.
>> But but but but you imagine you you walk like a spider in inside a wall.
>> Yeah.
>> Of a ball.
>> Yeah. Yeah, >> it's electromagnetic energy. And >> but why can't I why can't I see Los Angeles?
>> Yeah, forget it. Forget it.
>> Why would I forget that when it completely Why would I forget that when that is like the obvious disproof of your worldview?
>> But if you if you look through the ocean, >> the ocean doesn't curve up either.
>> There should be no there should be no horizon on a convex earth or in a convex earth. See, you can see because >> why is there a horizon at all?
>> Yeah, because light it's logical.
>> Not on a convex earth or in a convex earth.
>> Concave. Yeah.
>> Sorry, you're right. Concave Earth. Not Not in a concave Earth. There's no horizon in a concave Earth.
>> Yeah. At the end. Yes. Because we It's a circle. You're in standing in a circle.
So why why is there a horizon?
>> Yeah, because you're in the circle.
>> If you're if you're inside a circle, then there should be no place where the ground touches the sky. You should be able to see the ground all the way around >> regardless of what direction you look in. You'll be looking at the ground.
>> Yeah. If you look up, you look to the star. But I know. No, but that's that's too far because you with a you you can measure. Why does it why does it look blue when I look like in the opposite direction of the sun? Even though if I drew a line directly connecting my eyeball to where it to where I'm looking, it would actually end up on the ground >> because of course the the the the stars and and and the higher the air there for layers and they they are protected >> the layers. Um David, are you Dutch?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> Okay. Just checking. So like when you go out and look at the ocean, >> why is the why does the sky meet the ocean? Why doesn't the ocean just curve up?
>> Yeah, it it does. But you you you not aware to see it.
>> Wait, it does. How do you know it does?
>> You can do you can you keep in mind bender or paradise that paradise? You name the name?
>> No.
>> Yeah. He's on Tik Tok and he can he explain >> I have no idea who you're talking about.
Explain to me how it is that we don't look up or when we do look up we don't see more ocean if we're say at the beach instead we see sky.
>> I I I I I'm not so good in English but sometimes it's on the news or or when the weather they show ships they are above the ocean.
>> Yeah. Those are called miragages.
doesn't happen most of the time.
>> Yeah. Yeah. That's but that's not a mirage. That's because >> So in that case So in that case that's that's the true reality and every other time it's actually a mirage.
>> Uh wait again.
>> So you're you're saying that what that what scientists call a mirage is the the real world and what scientists call and and when we say that and when we say David David I'm in the middle of a sentence. And when we say that there's not a mirage, >> you're saying that that is a mirage.
>> I say that's the ocean.
>> Well, what what about when there are no ships that are above the water? What if they're just on the water? Why why doesn't the water curve up?
>> They are on the water. Yeah, that's the curve.
>> Why doesn't the water curve up?
>> Yeah, because the the in in the end the the it becomes some lighter because it's too far.
But we can see the stars 4,000 miles away.
>> Yeah. Because they have light and they such have >> Yeah. So boats boats also have lights.
>> Cities have lights.
>> Yeah.
>> City city lights are quite a bit brighter than starlights.
>> But starlight is radium. It's radium light.
>> It's radium light. Like the element radium.
>> We are in radium because of radium.
>> Can you tell me what radium is?
>> Yeah. nuclear energy.
>> Radium isn't nuclear energy. Radium is an element.
>> Yeah. Okay. But it's it's like electromagnetic energy. That's why you can walk on in the ball. That's why you stuck on the ball inside.
>> So, so the starlight is radium >> and that's why we can't see the Los Angeles city lights and why the boats seem to mirage curve up. What are we what are we saying?
>> Yeah, that's what we're saying. But in the stars there's a a hydron that makes energy out sent out energy. It's we are in a made the earth is made. It is future people made the create the earth.
>> So I don't know if this is a language barrier issue because maybe we just are disagreeing. Uh maybe maybe we're just not talking to each other effectively because of a language barrier.
>> But >> regardless of what of what language you speak, it should be pretty obvious that if we're on the inside of a ball >> Yeah.
>> then there shouldn't be a place that we can look where the sky is above the water, >> right?
>> Yeah.
>> So, how does that work if we're on the inside of the ball?
Yeah, but that's the distance. That's the distance.
>> The distance wouldn't make it look like the sky is above the water.
>> Yeah, but the mirage the mirage you you >> We're not talking about mirages. We're just talking about a normal clear day.
>> Yeah. Yeah. But the but the light the light is always bend. Light is always bending. You you think the sun is >> Why is light always bending?
>> Also, wait a minute. Hold on. How does a sunset work in the convex or concave earth?
>> Yeah, he's he he is he is of course circling around the with the stars. The ball the stars are in a ball. They are circle and the earth is standing still.
>> Yeah, sure. I get that. But like how does the sun go down if it's always above us?
Yeah. Because he makes a circle and maybe it goes a little bit up and a little bit down and >> No, but it goes below the ground.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> How does it go below the ground if it's always above us in the middle of the concave Earth?
>> Yeah. But that that that's because it's the light because the sun is not at that that that point. It's it's maybe next to you instead of front to you because it's the light is bending.
>> Why do you think Why do you think that the light is bending? so much.
>> Yeah, because that's Yeah, because the Earth is around inside of course.
>> Why would that make the light bend?
>> Because of the magnetic energy, >> magnetic fields don't make light bend.
>> Yeah, but yeah, but it's it's it's bending anyway.
>> So then how are the lights how is the light bending?
>> By what mechanism is the what is the light bending?
because of the the yeah the the magnetic energies >> magnetic energies don't make light bend.
Ah, wait, wait, wait, wait. But of course, there there there is the hydron inside the the stars. And >> how is the look look once the light leaves the sun?
>> How does the light bend?
>> No, the the sun is uh connected with the hydron wireless.
>> It's connected with the what?
>> The sun is not sun. It's a artificial an artificial sun. Wait, if it's if it's if it's artificial, who put it there?
>> Yeah, that's a problem. Of course, other civilizations.
>> How did they get inside the concave Earth?
>> Yeah, that's that are questions we we cannot answer.
>> Well, I mean, we could answer them. We could just be like, "Oh, this is a bad idea. The Earth is actually a ball and we live on the outside."
>> No, >> that's the correct answer.
>> No, no, no, really not.
But >> how does it David? How does it feel to have even flatearthers think you're wrong?
>> I was in beginning a flat earther also.
But then somebody said to me that's not possible and then I going to think and yes I I that's not they >> imagine imagine being imagine being so gullible. Imagine being so gullible that you were a flatearther and then you realized it wasn't possible, so you went to concave Earth instead >> instead of realizing that, oh, the Earth is a ball and we live on the outside.
>> Yeah. But but >> that's like you're you're descending even deeper into the impossible world.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> You're even more wrong than you were before.
>> Yeah. I also drink urine through my nose, for example.
>> You drink No, never mind. You you know you you must believe also like we we can become 100,000 years old. It's actually >> what >> you know we we get we there will be return three sons in 45 years we can David we can I have a feeling you're not going to be alive in 45 years but I can assure you that there won't be three sons in 45 years. Not. Yeah, it must because like look look like the like like the the deserts they are nuclear fall out.
>> The deserts are nuclear fallout. Why is there no nuclear radiation hanging around in the deserts then?
>> Yeah, you can you can measure sometimes.
>> You can measure nuclear radiation a little bit everywhere. Not especially high in the deserts.
>> Uhhuh. Yeah. Maybe some places.
>> Did you say that you drink urine through your nose? Yeah.
>> Why would you do that?
>> I was wrong that too for 30 years. I I was thinking on the skin for health and then later I real Yeah. Because life is too simple for we are 80 years old and then that's done. It's not >> Yeah. Why would that mean that you should drink urine through your nose >> to actually but it's too late?
>> What?
>> To become to to to survive.
>> David, what year is it?
>> Yeah, actually we live in year 600, but that's a different story.
>> Okay. And who's the president of the United States?
>> Yeah, but but you never studied like Tataria.
Do you know who the president of the United States is?
>> Yes, of course. It's my I'm in crypto and I'm a big fan.
>> No, no, but who is it?
>> Trump.
>> Okay.
Okay. Um, David, I think I'm going to let you go here. Um, I would suggest talking to a professional.
>> Good luck.
>> I I don't know. I don't know if I should even post that.
I mean, he knew who Trump was, so I don't know if he's just like really really conspiracy or if he's mentally ill.
If he's conspiracy, I don't have a problem posting it. If he's mentally ill, I'm not going to post it. So, maybe I just won't post it. supposed to be on the safe side.
From empiricist with the $2. Uh, thought this was opposition only. He says not flat. Well, okay, sure. But he is even more wrong.
From Juice Vandover with the 10 heroes called it. Here's the promised super chat. And on behalf of the Dutch, we do apologize for this person.
Maybe he needs help. I don't know.
Uh, from Dr. Fudge with the $5.
Miragages out on the ocean are typically also inverted. So the floating boats are upside down as is the style at the time.
What? I don't understand that.
What do you mean as is the style at the time? Uh from the FPS Cameron with the $5 five kuck bucks, sorry. Concave Earth was experimentally confirmed by my grandparents having to walk to school and back uphill both ways. Blitz so dumb to not That's so funny. That is exceptionally funny. By the way, uh jokes on you. It wouldn't be uphill both ways because down is towards the outside.
Sorry, it's a little bit chilly.
And from Jack Federer with the $2. If visual equals uh then if visual equals actual then mirage else nuhuh. Okay. I I think that there's probably some symbols there that I'm not picking up on, but I I I get the idea. Um, all right. Let's bring up our next guest.
Let's talk to Valhella.
Valhella, how's it going?
>> Not too bad.
>> Glad to hear a question for you.
>> Yeah, sure.
>> All right. They say that there's vacuum in space, right?
>> Uh, so I'm happy to answer that. I just want to double check. You think the Earth is flat?
Well, this is where I'm I think it's round, but I'm trying to see where they're in an argument over the way why it's flat or round.
>> Okay. Well, so I don't I'm not doing the whole um devil's advocate thing, so I'm going to let you go, but feel free to listen in and get answers to your questions. Let's talk to Thomas.
>> Thomas, how's it going?
>> Good, good, Dr. place to a Z.
>> What? Okay. Uh Thomas, what shape do you think the earth is?
>> My question is actually why do you argue with people who thinks are flat the the earth is flat? Because like it looks like a nonsense argument.
>> Let's talk to Abshari.
Ab Shar abshari. How's it going, Abshari?
Abshari, you're on the live.
Okay.
Uh, did I I feel like All right, let's talk to Rock Felleris.
Rock Feleris, how's it going?
>> Uh, good.
>> Glad to hear it. Rock Felis, what shape do you think the Earth is?
So basically I think the earth is like uh flat but also hollow but it's like so it's like a donut but it's like hollow on the inside and then basically thanks for being here.
>> It's like a neo libertan.
>> Let's talk to menor.
He was a neoliarian philangist meor. How's it going, Menor?
>> Hello, >> Menor. What shape do you think the Earth is?
>> I think it's flat. I'm pretty confident in that.
>> Okay, Menor, why do you think that the Earth is flat?
>> There's a lot of evidence when you look at the the R like the rainbow. Where does the rainbow shape come from?
>> Yeah, >> obviously it comes from the dome.
>> Oh, you think so?
>> So, in fact, there's actually a really good explanation for why the rainbow shape is the way it is. The rainbow shape is the way it is because of the angle that light bounces through a water droplet. And in fact, this is pretty easy to see because you can produce rainbows in your garage, which you can see like the curvature of the rainbow without being open to the sky at all.
It needs uh something like a dome, you know, to sort of come from the reflection of the dome. You can't just create a rainbow, you know, as you say, in your garage.
>> You absolutely can. I'm surprised you've never seen this. Um, let me show you a picture.
>> Cuz this is like, and look, I I I understand that this is probably a point of privilege because I grew up in a place that had a garage and, you know, had all those things and it's possible that you didn't. Um, but just as an example, here's a picture >> of two kids or a few kids making a rainbow inside.
See that?
>> No, I don't see where >> you look at your screen.
You don't?
>> No, I don't see. Are you >> That's >> Are you looking at your screen? Okay.
Well, everybody else can see it.
>> Yes.
>> Are are you just like lying to me?
>> Nothing has changed. You know, when I >> Did you see the picture that I sent you or that I showed you? Did you Did you see it?
>> Can I send it again? Maybe it's it's unpassed. Can you see it now?
What is happening?
Men are have When was the last time you got your eyes checked?
>> Anyone sees it in the comments? Cuz me don't see.
>> Everybody sees it in the comments.
I'm being serious.
>> Are are you sure?
>> Okay. So, would you explain?
>> By the way, here here's a uh here's a rainbow as viewed from a airplane.
>> And I imagine you're telling me that like the dome is touching the farmland below it, right?
But as I say, you look at >> Hey, hey, Menor, don't just ignore what I said. Menor, don't just ignore what I said.
>> Okay, what you say? What you said?
>> Do you see the rainbow behind me?
>> I can see the picture there.
>> Okay, so why is there a rainbow if it's not the firmament? Like here we have like this is clearly not the firmament because it's curving down.
It's curving, you know, downwards. Why is it that we see this rainbow? That doesn't >> that doesn't disprove my point.
>> Sure it does. It proves that rainbows are not the result of the firmament.
>> Still the rise of the rainbow goes, you know, from the firminance. It's a reflection.
>> Oh, it's a reflection. So why is it appearing to come from below them? Is the firmament below them?
>> But doesn't to my point for >> it does. It does. Rainbows have nothing to do with the firmament. Rainbows can happen in any in any situation where you have water droplets in the air and a backlit light source.
>> You should test it. You should test it and know something that >> it's it's very it's very easy to create a rainbow >> and have a source of lights there.
>> It's very easy to create a rainbow.
>> But this this is another case by obviously the situation of rainbow. So just to be clear, >> just to be clear, it does disprove your point that rainbows are are a result of the firmament, right? That absolutely does disprove your point.
>> Where have you seen a a rainbow similar to these? You know that doesn't >> I have seen a rainbow from an airplane before and it looks like that.
>> Okay. Why is it every time that every almost every rainbow comes from what you would say like is the dome from up? You don't have like it's just you're just seeing part of a circle and you're seeing part of a circle because you're seeing reflections, internal reflections from water droplets that are everywhere and it comes in at a certain angle. So, it's going to form a circle because it's bouncing at that angle in all directions.
I can show you a diagram if you'd like.
Let me show you a diagram. This might help. Um >> like there's lot of evidence.
>> What evidence? Bes I mean like you brought up the you brought up the rainbows and that doesn't seem to work.
So what's the evidence?
>> Yeah. Another um let's say you you see I'm sure you have heard of the the North Pole.
>> I have heard of the North Pole. Have you heard of the North Pole? the North Star or the North.
>> Yeah, I've heard of the North Star. Have you heard of the North Star?
>> Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. So, is it that it's consistent? You know, >> if it's not it's not if you go further south than the equator.
>> No, I mean like if the Earth was like like randomly in space, why is it that every time we keep on coming across the >> It's not moving randomly in space. It's rotating about its own axis and its axis is pointed at the North Star. Now better question for you menor. Why is it that you can't see the north star from say Australia?
>> Uh it's because the obviously it's a flat and uh it's reflected because it's come it's very far you know it's very far such that uh um >> it's very far >> sight >> it's out of sight. It's like >> so why does it suddenly become insight the moment you cross the the equator?
because it's near.
>> It's not near. It's quite far away still.
In fact, I I'm actually curious how far away you think the North Star is when you're in say at the North Pole.
>> Uh there it's obviously near because >> how well how near how near is it?
>> Just that um you know it's very good evidence that they're not. Hey, can you answer my question >> rather than avoiding it? Could you answer my question? That'd be good.
>> Okay. To be honest, now um the evidence of the nonpol is kind of suspicious know if >> Hey, can you answer my question? That'd be good.
>> Instead of dodging, can you just answer my question?
If you're >> I'm not going to lie.
>> Yeah, please don't lie. If you're standing at the North Pole, how far away, how high above you is the North Star.
>> If you're standing at the North Pole?
>> Mhm.
>> It should be very near.
>> Okay. How near is it?
>> Is it one mile away? Is it a 100 miles away? Is it a thousand miles away? Where is it? How far is it?
I I don't have the exact measurement exact.
>> Okay.
>> Kind of concerning that you don't. Did you know that we could figure it out? If the Earth was actually flat, we could figure it out by using some math. Did you know that?
>> Have you heard of the black rock?
>> You're not going to answer my question, are you?
Have you >> Why do you so do you have like the attention span of a fly or do you just not want to talk about the North Pole anymore because it obviously debunks your entire worldview?
>> No, it's because the reason I mentioned that is because I'm trying to debunk the North Pole that >> debunk the North Pole, >> you know, like the North Pole, you know, um we are not getting the the true North Pole.
>> Yeah. So menor >> main >> if the earth is flat, do you think that we can use math to figure out how high above the ground the north star is?
Oh, he ran.
shame.
Well, by the way, just so everybody knows, the answer is obviously yes. If the Earth is flat and the North Star is above the middle bit, then you could just use trigonometry, if you know what angle the star is at in the sky and you know how far away you are from the North Pole, you can use trigonometry to figure out how high above the North Pole it is. And what you'll find is that the North Star is in different places depending on where you're looking at it from, right? So if you're in North America, say at, I don't know, 40° north, um, that means that the North Pole will be 40° above the horizon. Now, you can just figure out the distance to the north to the North Pole pretty easily. You could look on Google Earth or something like this, or you could just Google it, whatever.
However you want to figure it out, you'll get a distance to the North Pole.
Now the trouble is is that every 1°ree that you uh or every 69 miles that you go south, so every as the distance from the north pole increases by 69 mi, the north star dips by one degree. And so you can take two of those triangles or three of those triangles, each one differing by 69°, and you'll find that the north pole the north star has to be in different places depending on where you're looking at it from. But that's not true because the north star is one thing. So it can't be in different places at the same time.
All right, we have a super chat from Dr. Fudge with the $2. Was joke. I was just implying we both upside down. Oh, I see.
And from Jack Feder with the $2.
Encoding and databases greater than or less than less than greater than means not equal to. Why wouldn't you just use exclamation mark equals? From Jack Federer with the $5. Failed AT&T commercial. Can you hear me now? No.
Now. No. No.
It's a good joke. An old joke, but a good joke. All right, let's talk to John K. Hansen.
>> John, how's it going?
>> Good morning.
>> Morning. John, can you turn off your TV?
>> Sure. Much appreciated.
>> Okay. So, John, what shape do you think the Earth is?
round.
>> Okay. Why'd you join?
>> Because I have a question.
>> Okay. Well, now is not the time.
>> You ever debate KK Caleb? Yeah, I've debated him. I don't debate him anymore because he's a Nazi. Oxbait, how's it going?
>> Hello, bro. How are you?
>> I'm all right. Ox Bait, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> Oh, sorry.
>> What? Can you repeat the Can you repeat that one more time? Sorry.
>> Yeah. What What shape do you think the Earth is?
>> Oh, it's flat.
>> Okay. Why do you think it's flat?
>> I just don't get it. Like, why does water look flat over the distance?
>> No, it doesn't really It doesn't make sense.
>> It doesn't really look flat. It looks like pretty flat, but not perfectly flat. And if it did look perfectly perfectly flat, then you couldn't you wouldn't be able to go far enough away to not be able to see the water anymore or to see things on the water anymore.
>> Sorry for the messages. Let me just mute my phone. My apologies.
>> You're good.
>> I got more questions on my notes cuz I want to get prepared for this.
>> Okay. Yeah. So, um >> So, >> look. So, you understand my answer though, right?
>> Yeah, I do. But I got more yet.
>> Okay. Can you repeat back to me what my answer was just to just then I can check the check to make sure that you understood what I said.
>> I didn't really >> Okay. So then I'll say it again. So water doesn't look flat. It looks close to flat, >> but it doesn't look flat. And the way that we know it doesn't look flat is because we can see things curving away from us.
>> We can see the water curving away from us as things get further and further away.
>> I get that now. But you're not completely wrong here. But at the same time, I don't I don't I never noticed it myself. That's what it is.
Plus, I got more questions here on my notes. There's this one. Yeah. Why are there a few >> Why are there so few uh live videos from space compared to how advanced technology is?
>> So, there's not there's literally a 24/7 live stream from the International Space Station. There's plenty. But look, I was asking you why you think the Earth is flat, and you're not giving me an answer. You're just asking questions.
Questions are not an answer to my question.
I mean, I'm trying to get like cuz you know cuz you know the Earth is flat. By me asking these questions, you're understanding my answer. Do you get where I'm coming from?
>> No, I'd prefer you just provide some evidence that the Earth is flat.
>> That'd be good.
I mean, okay. Well, if the earth is moving, that's a question. That's a I believe, let me answer this. I believe if the earth is spinning, why are we not feeling it? But that's a question.
>> Yep. That's a question.
>> Isn't it? Look, Ox Bait, isn't it kind of weird that you can't actually provide evidence for your belief? All of your beliefs are just questions. for my beliefs.
>> But but questions aren't evidence.
>> They are in a way though. I can argue with because I'm asking >> if they were evidence then you wouldn't need to ask questions. You would just provide the evidence.
You could look like I could just give you the evidence that the earth is a sphere for example.
>> Even if you tell me that still like I I will try and invol it wouldn't involve me asking you questions.
Right. Go on then.
>> So, one piece of evidence. The North Stars angle in the sky decreases by one degree every 69 miles you move south.
The North Star is not visible beyond the equator.
>> The we have photographs and videos of a spherical Earth. Of course, that's a piece of evidence. We can also measure the lengths of shadows from uh like simultaneously in different locations.
And we can correlate the length of >> You don't know how to measure the length of shadows?
>> No, I mean, have you done it?
>> Yeah, I have. I've participated in this experiment. In fact, I participated in this experiment with a flatearther who I'm not sure if he's still a flat-earther, but the data that we collected was perfectly in line with the spherical earth and not consistent with the flat earth. Other pieces of data that the earth is a globe and not flat is that we can measure and demonstrate the existence of a gravitational force of mass attracting mass which would produce a uh inward gravitational pole collapsing anything that was flat into a ball.
We can measure the rotation of the earth using something called a Compton generator which is a device for measuring the corololis effect which is a a consequence of the rotation of the earth. We can also see the earth's rotation from a fukult pendulum. swings back and forth and it processes as the earth spins underneath it. So, I can just give you hundreds of pieces of evidence without asking you a single question. So, I'd like to know what's the evidence for the Earth being flat.
>> See, you got me on this side.
>> Isn't it kind of weird that you don't have evidence?
>> I just don't believe it. I just don't believe it. Even my parents, I mean, they my my mom hates me, bro.
My dad thinks I'm stupid as well. Every time I say, he throws food at me if I'm on the table and he calls me stupid. I just believe it.
>> 18.
>> Okay, just making sure. Continue.
>> So, even though it might sound funny, I still believe it. I mean, I got more questions on my notes. I mean, the the picture >> Why would you believe the Earth is flat?
I was born with it.
>> All right. It's a troll. It's a troll.
Mods benom.
Mods. Ban him. Make sure he never see he never sees the light of day again.
Uh from Asal Shocker with the five Kuck Bucks. New spin-off series idea. Babs debates sovereign citizens. Please put in a good word, doctor. She would be so sad.
She would be so sad.
And from Jack Feder with the $5. Part of me is happy that all the flirts today aren't American by accent, but then the other part of me is equally sad.
Yeah. Isn't that rough? All right, let's talk to I love Metallica.
I love Metallica.
>> How's it going?
>> Good morning, my mommy.
>> All right, let's talk to Coconut.
Coconut, how's it going?
Hello.
>> How's it going?
>> Uh, good. How about yourself?
>> I'm doing all right. Coconut, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> Um, flat.
>> All right. Why do you think it's flat?
>> Well, years ago, I was on a cruise ship and I went to the very, very, very top of the cruise ship where there was a water slide.
>> I looked all around 360 degrees >> and it was all level. There was no curvature whatsoever. What part of the world were you in, if you don't mind me asking?
>> I was in It was a cruise ship that was going to It was like passing like Cuba and Okay. Or Florida.
>> So, could you see Cuba?
>> Uh, no.
>> Why not?
>> Well, um, we're in the middle of the ocean. I mean, >> yeah, I know. So, why couldn't you see Cuba?
>> Well, we had already passed it. I know, but why couldn't you see it?
>> Uh cuz politely it was uh too far away for my eyesight to see it.
>> But there was nothing blocking it from you seeing it. Blocking you from seeing it rather, right? I mean, you were at the topest part of the cruise ship. If the Earth is flat, then you should be able to see it because it's nothing with me and your vision is finite.
>> You shouldn't need a telescope. Cuba's big.
>> Yeah. I mean, we had to be uh at a good distance from it for for us not to see it.
>> But Cuba Cuba's quite big. You should you can see Cuba from space.
>> It's it's an enormous island.
>> You know how big Cuba is.
>> I mean, if you're if you're on a plane above it, of course you can see it.
>> Yeah. So, why couldn't you see it from the uh top of your cruise ship?
because it was too far away and your vision is not like >> what was stopping you from seeing it.
You were so high up.
>> You were so high up. Nothing was blocking your vision. Uh nothing was blocking you from seeing it.
>> Distance.
>> What's stopping the light from getting from Cuba to your eyeball?
>> Oh, yeah. I see what you're trying to say. You're trying to say because it's a curvature and it's on the other side.
What I'm saying is that if the Earth is flat, you should be able to see Cuba because I mean it's not like anything's in the way. Um, and it's not like human eyes. Yeah, it's not like human eyes have a rendered distance. So why couldn't you see it?
>> Okay, but what about um what about the fact that you never ever see >> I love this. Um why can't you answer my question? Why can't you see it? Which part of what what is stopping the light that is bouncing off of Cuba from getting into your eyeball?
>> Well, I heard people explain that it has to do with um perspective.
So, >> how is p what is is perspective a physical thing that's stopping the light from getting into your eyeball?
>> No.
>> So, then what is stopping the light from getting into your eyeball?
Um if okay if if you have let's say let's say that you're in the in the coast of um New York and you look across the ocean you would you're saying that you should be I mean you should be able to see Africa on the other side of the ocean >> in principle. Yeah.
I mean, the thing is, the thing is is that there's nothing stopping the light from getting to your eyeball.
>> What do you mean your vision is not infinite? Your vision doesn't know how far away things are. Light either gets to your eyeball or it doesn't.
So, what's stopping the light from getting to your eyeball?
>> The ocean.
>> So, the ocean is blocking the light. So the light from Cuba, which is land, which is higher than the ocean, the ocean, the the light is somehow being blocked by the ocean, even though the ocean is lower, and it's trying to get to you, which is higher up.
>> Yeah, I kind of I kind of see what you're saying.
>> It doesn't really make sense, does it?
No, but the thing is that you know the flat earers they they make so many points that seem to be accurate like for example they say if a helicopter goes up in the air >> and it stays up there for an hour.
>> Yep.
>> Now the and it comes back down. It's not like a thousand miles away. It comes back down in the same spot. Well, to be clear, it's not like you can't it's not like you can take your hands off the controls and you'll end up in the same spot. You have to like intentionally hover. But >> the point is is that the air is moving with the ground, too.
So, why would the air Why would you end up somewhere else if you're in the air >> because the Earth is moving, >> but so is the air? The air above the Earth is moving with the Earth.
>> But is the air going to push the helicopter into the air? helicopter is in the air. Yeah, that's that's what keeps it from in general. The way that a helicopter moves is by pushing off the air or the rather the air pushing off pushing off the helicopter. So the air moving with the earth will keep the helicopter in place at least approximately. Of course, winds will blow it around a little bit.
And the other thing the other thing they say is the earth is moving around the sun at uh 666,000 miles but then the sun itself is moving across the universe at you know at a tremendous speed. So, if a movie got all these, you know, uh, terrifying speeds, how is it that the sky and the stars like the Big Dipper and and all that stuff is always in the same spot?
>> They're not always they're not always in the same spot. Do you know what your horoscope sign is?
>> Um, Leo.
>> Okay. Uh, do you know that the horoscope signs are constellations?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Do you know do you know where in the sky Leo is?
>> Uh, no.
>> Okay. I I So, I don't happen to know either, but what I do know is that if you were to go look up where Leo is, what month of the year were you born?
>> Leo is like August. Okay. So, if you were to go look up into the sky in say February, um, you would be able to find the constellation Leo. You could open up there's like an app that you can open up. It's like called Star Sky View or something. And you can punch in a constellation. It'll tell you what direction to point your phone in and it'll show you where the constellation is and you can go look and you can see it, right? Um, it's really a really neat way to look at the sky. But importantly, if you go out on your birthday and you look for the constellation Leo, you won't be able to see it anywhere.
And this is because the constellation the stars that we see change over the course of a year because the the Earth moves around the sun.
Okay. But what happens uh say 10 20 30 years pass by.
>> So the earth moves around the sun in the same way every year. So the relative star positions will be approximately the same year over year. Now if you're asking why don't the stars why aren't the stars in different places now than they were 100 years ago >> exactly >> on like the same day of the year. That's because the stars are really really far away. But there are stars, and I can show you this. This is actually like fascinating. There are stars that move so fast and are so close that we can actually measure their change in position over the course of a human.
>> Let me show you something.
>> You're saying that the stars are actually moving.
>> Actually moving. No. No. Well, not No, that's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that the star we can see the stars move over time, >> year over year.
>> Um, so hopefully you can see this. So, this is Barnard Star. Um, let me rewind a little bit.
Okay, I'll I'll just show you instead a different one. This is 61 Signney. Um, unp sorry.
So, what we have is we have a pair of stars and this is measured. I see a pair of star on the right hand side.
>> Yeah, it's the same star just zoomed in.
See how it's moving?
Uh-huh.
>> That's those are stars that we see moving in the sky year over year.
>> Whoa.
>> Now, they're only moving a little bit because they're very, very far away.
But they are moving and we can measure this.
So, what on earth could be causing that if the Earth were flat projection?
>> Why would the star Why would those stars be moving and the other ones wouldn't?
Um, I don't I don't think that will be possible, can it?
>> Yeah, that's a good point. But and yet we see it. So that means that the Earth can't be flat.
>> But what about what they say about the sky being a holographic projection?
>> Do you even know what those words mean?
Uh >> because I don't know what I don't know what they mean when they say the sky is a holographic projection.
>> A h like a hologram is something that's projected with uh with a which a huge projector project.
>> So you mean like a movie screen >> like a Yeah, like a fake like a fake uh you know how they sometimes take a >> Where is the projector?
That's a good question because I don't know if the projector is on Earth itself or if it's on the other side.
>> Who built the projector? Who's controlling the projector?
What is the projector made out of? Why can't we block the projector?
>> Well, obviously we're not anywhere close to it.
>> So then how is it projecting onto our dome?
>> Cuz someone is doing it. Someone is projecting all that stuff from the outside.
It could be from the outside.
>> Well, it can't be. If it was from the inside, then we would be able to block it, right?
>> Well, except they don't let us go there.
>> Where? How do you know? You don't even know where it is.
>> Well, it's got to be in Antarctica because that's the place where >> But you're allowed to go to Antarctica.
>> Well, they signed a treaty and and then no one can go there.
>> Oh, have you read the treaty? Because I have.
>> No flying. So, >> have you have you read the treaty?
>> No, I don't know where it's at. I don't know if it's public.
>> Have you considered googling it? Because you can just Google, and I'll show you how to do this in case you need help.
You can just Google uh here, Antarctic Treaty. And literally the first link, literally the first link, ats.aq, this is the official Antarctic Treaty website. You can go read the original Antarctic Treaty or you can go look at the one with searchable text. It's literally the first Google.
>> Oh, I didn't know you could do that.
But still, they're they say that.
>> So then why did you think that you couldn't go there? Why did you think that you know that it's a no-fly zone?
Why did you think any of this?
>> Because it's all over Tik Tok.
>> Do you just believe everything you see on Tik Tok?
>> Not everything. I mean, >> apparently apparently you do.
I mean there are things that I actually have to go to the uh artificial intelligence and say hey is so and so true and it would tell me.
>> Have you considered using your brain yourself like reading the source materials rather than relying on TikTok and AI?
>> Well, I'm not that too good on reading cuz uh >> but you have to read the AI stuff.
>> No, it speaks it.
>> Just ask. Okay, here's what I'm going to do.
>> Wait a minute. Hold on.
Do you think that you know more about the way the world is than like I don't know all of the scientists on the planet?
>> No sir.
>> So then if they all think the earth is a sphere, why do you think the earth is flat?
>> Just because there's so much contradiction.
>> Okay. So you just told me that you're not the strongest reader. Is it possible that what sounds like a contradiction to you isn't a contradiction?
I mean, how how could it not be if you have so many people that are for flat earth and then another ton of people that are for the sphere >> and knowing that >> every single scientist, every single scientist on the planet, I'm not talking about governments, I'm talking about just individual people like you and me whose job it is to be a scientist.
>> Every single scientist on the planet thinks that the earth is a globe.
The people who the people who are telling you that the earth is flat on Tik Tok, these are high school dropouts overwhelmingly.
>> So who is more likely to be right? A bunch of high school dropouts on Tik Tok or every single scientist in the world?
>> But they say that all that stuff that they show about the globe is CGI.
>> Why do you believe them?
>> Why do you believe them that it's CGI?
Because I mean when the Artemis just went up there, I you know I expected to see like some real pictures of the other side of the moon.
>> Yeah. And and you got them >> and and they basically look like the same side that we always look at.
>> Oh, I can show you the pictures >> because I mean there's been talk about them being structures and all kind of stuff on the other side of the moon.
>> Here, one sec. Let me pull you. Let me see if I can find a picture from the far side. We want to Oh, well, unfortunately, it wasn't in daytime, right? Uh, but we have part of it here.
Does this look like the day side of the moon?
The regular side of the moon that we usually see.
>> I mean, it's it's just craters.
>> Yeah, the the side of the moon that we usually see is not nearly at all like that.
The close side of the moon looks like this. So, I I'll just show you two separate pictures. One's the close side, one's the far side. Which one was the picture that I just showed you more like?
>> Um, the one on the the one on the right looks like the first picture you showed.
>> Mhm.
>> And the one on the left looks like what we usually see on on >> You got it. So this one, this one is the close side of the moon. This one is the far side of the moon. And the picture that I showed you, this one is this side.
>> So this is a picture this is a picture of the far side of the moon.
>> Oh, yeah. I see what you're saying. But I mean, wouldn't you think theoretically it should look all the same?
>> No. If there's one side that always faces the Earth and one side that doesn't always face the Earth, they're going to have different interactions with the world around them. Asteroids will hit them in different ways. They'll be stretched and pulled from the gravity in different ways.
>> Well, the thing is, >> why would they look the same?
>> The the moon is what do you call it?
Asynchronous orbit or whatever that the same side.
>> The moon isn't the moon is tidily locked, >> right? It's in a title lot, but as it's going around the Earth, you know, the back side of the moon is always going to uh face different directions because sometimes it's facing towards the sun, sometimes it's facing away from the sun.
>> Yeah.
>> So, even though it's not it, you know, even though it's not doing the same thing that the Earth does with the rotation, >> it should be basically be the same.
>> Why would it be the same? There's the the key difference is that on the close side of the Earth, that's the side facing the Earth. So, for example, you will have Earth's gravity is pulling on the close side more than it's pulling on the far side. You will have the Earth's gravity affecting asteroids that are coming by more on the close side than on the far side.
>> Ah, yeah, I see what you're saying. So the earth is kind of >> the earth is playing a role >> as a protection >> kind of look. So all I'm saying all I'm getting at is like it seems like you've been heavily influenced by conspiracy theorists on the internet. Instead of doing that, why not go watch documentaries by scientists? Because honestly, who's more likely to be right about this stuff? like just some random guy who, you know, I don't know.
>> Yeah.
>> Like injured his head in high in like high school football or like a dork who spent 30 years learning.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I see what you're saying cuz I mean like some of the people who are claiming the flat earth, they're kind of young. Well, this one guy said he was like 36.
And and the thing is that they seem so adamant and so convinced and they also link it to the to the Bible because they say, "Oh, the Bible says that the earth is flat."
>> That's what some people say. Definitely.
Some people think that the Bible says the earth is flat. But like isn't it a little weird that even the well-educated scientists who are also Christians, they also don't think the earth is flat.
>> Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense.
>> So I think that you should probably like re-evaluate where you get your information from.
retrain your algorithm so that it's picking up stuff from scientists, from journalists rather than from, you know, randos on the internet who have no education, no expertise in the field, and are obviously are monetarily incentivized to get views.
>> Yeah. Because the the one thing that was always confusing me because they about the flat eartherers is that they say that Antarctica is actually an ice wall that surrounds the earth. But if that were the case, why wouldn't ships and airplanes run into the ice wall and say uh the north pole or east or west and the only place that they see the ice wall is on the south where the Antarctica is. So I'm saying how could we not know for sure that the earth is flat if it was in surrounding the whole earth?
>> Well, fortunately we don't even need to we don't even need to believe that there is an ice wall because you can just go to Antarctica. It's expensive, but you can just go to Antarctica.
But the reason they're telling you this is because they're grifters.
>> Um, but look, I'm going to let you go. I would suggest see if you can retrain your algorithm or make a new Tik Tok account and then just try to uh try to watch the sc like you'll be fed a lot of videos but when it asks you what kind of videos you want um tell it like science videos or like history videos like and you'll get actual good educational content rather than just you know conspiracy slop.
>> All right, man. Thank you. Appreciate it.
>> Take care.
So, people talk a lot about the failure of the American education system or the failure of our education systems in general. I don't know if he was genuinely American. Um, that was a good example.
All right, let's bring up Grayson Adams.
>> Wait, hold up. Is this me?
>> Yeah, it's you. Grayson, how's it going?
>> Yes way.
Grayson, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> Well, okay. I don't really think At first I was like the flat earther and then but I don't think it's flat anymore. I honestly think that our perception as a human, like everything's really within us, our human body, >> everything we see is just a perception of what we see. It's almost like like honestly I don't really think it's flat or round, but I don't think it's round.
>> Okay. Why don't you think it's round?
>> Because honestly, if there was one real photo of Earth that wasn't edited, then I would believe it. But >> what's your uh criteria for figuring out whether it's edited or not?
>> Wait, what do you mean? I mean, no, >> like if you see if if you see a photo, how do you know if it's edited or not?
>> Well, there's like actually a lot of stuff you could see. Number one, like the Earth would always be a perfect perfect sphere. And I thought it was an oval. Like that's what all the scientists say. It's an oval.
>> It's I mean it's not really an oval. You wouldn't like >> what's what do you call it? Uh >> do you know do you know how close to a perfect sphere it is?
>> No. I mean it's like they call I've seen if you search up Wait, can you do this like and show the stream?
>> Yeah. So look look. So the Earth is the Earth is the Earth is an Oblate spheroid.
>> Yeah.
>> But an Oblate spheroid is >> Wait, Mom. One second.
Grayson, how old are you?
>> Hold up. Hold up.
>> Yeah, one sec.
>> Grayson, how old are you?
>> Grayson, how old are you?
>> That's embarrassing. I'm 18.
>> Okay. Um, >> that's not bad.
>> So, >> see, now I just Yeah. Okay.
>> So, the Earth is an Oblade spheroid. An Oblade spheroid is just any shape that is like a sphere, but is kind of fatter around the edges. Right. Now, that could be that it's minuscule fatter around the edges, or it could be a lot fatter around the edges.
>> So, the Earth is an oblate spheroid, but it's >> just a teensy tiny bit fatter around the edges. It's like 12 miles fatter around the edges than it is around the poles.
>> So, it's not like enough to show >> you wouldn't It's less than 1%. It's actually less than a tenth of a percent fatter around the edges. So, if you see a photo of the Earth, you're not going to see the failure to be a sphere, the failure to be a circle.
>> I've also like, if you can literally search this up on Google, like NASA does admit to like editing the photos.
>> Well, no. So, I'm asking you, if I if I show you a photo, how will you figure out whether it's fake or not?
>> Well, I mean, it's pretty obvious. Yeah, >> dude. This is embarrassing now.
>> Yeah, I bet it is.
>> Yeah. Okay, my bad, guys. So, >> well, I just like if there's a lot of like satellites in there, why can't we see like a live video?
>> I'm going to show you. We We have live videos literally 247 live videos.
>> Um, >> I did not know that.
>> Yeah. Well, I mean, you would know that if you had looked into it. I'm going to show you a photo and I want you to tell me if it's fake and how you know it's and like how it was faked. Okay. So, here's a photo.
>> Dude, that just like it just doesn't look it looks too perfect. Okay. Which part about it or how was it faked?
>> It is literally a perfect circle.
>> How is it faked?
>> Bro, I like it's just Look at that. It literally >> No, no, I'm asking how was it faked?
>> What do you mean? Like >> like what what did they do to fake it?
How did they fake it?
>> I mean, I don't know what they do to fake it, but >> So then how do you know it was faked?
>> Cuz look at it. Like it just it's just >> it's Yeah, it's it's almost a perfect sphere. What about it?
>> Mhm.
>> Okay. It's supposed to be That's the shape. That's the shape that is. that it was not a perfect sphere >> by less than one or less than 0.1%.
>> Wait, can you search up the true shape of Earth and it will show up as like not a photo, but it's like not a perfect sphere.
>> Hold on. We'll get to that. I promise we will. But I want you to tell me, >> dude.
Grayson, go deal with your mom.
He could be 18. I mean, like, it's possible. It's just real embarrassing for him, and I don't need to do that to him from Gain with the $5, which is more ridiculous. The idea that the idea of the Earth is flat or that a conspiracy could possibly hide something so huge and obvious emotes the latter. Yeah, I don't know how you would hide that, right? That seems impossible. Uh, by the way, while we're here, um, while we're in between guests, which we have a lot of, so, you know, we'll bring one up in a minute.
Um, if you guys like what I'm doing, there are a few ways that you can support me. One way is just subscribing on YouTube. You can also watch in horizontal mode either on Twitch at the blitzphd account, whatever it's called, or you can watch on the Dr. Blitz Debunks YouTube channel. Um, if you prefer to watch on vertical, you can watch on Tik Tok or you can watch on the App Blitz PhD YouTube channel. Both places you can watch uh vertical or horizontal. Now, so subscribing is a great way to support me. Liking the live obviously a great way to support me if that's the kind of thing that you want. But if you do have like a ton of throwaway money for some reason and you want to support a streamer or a science uh science communicator or a researcher that you like for whatever reason, there are ways to do that. Obviously, super chats will get your messages read. But if you go to my website, which is just blitz.phd, which is it's so cool that I got that uh domain name. Let me just show you the website. If you go to my website, here it is.
Just blitz.phd.
And you scroll down to the bottom. Hey, that's me. What you'll see is that there's like a support me link. So there's like Patreon and Cash App and Buy Me a Coffee and these things. And so if you want to send me money somehow, that's the way to do it. Um then YouTube doesn't take 30%, Tik Tok doesn't take 40% or whatever it takes. So that's a cool thing to do if that's something you're interested in if you have a lot of expendable income. Uh if you don't though, just enjoy the show. So uh all right, let's bring on our next guest.
Oh, never mind. We have one super chat from Cyber Deconstruction with the $2 when your mom kills your streaming career. Yeah. Isn't that Isn't that so sad?
All right, let's bring up Jibberjabber.
Jibberjabber, how's it going?
>> I'm okay. How are you?
>> I'm doing all right. Jibberjabber, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> I know it's flat.
>> Okay. Why do you think so?
Can I just start by saying you're kind of disagreeing with a lot of people, so can we start by agreeing on stuff?
>> Um, sure. As long as you're going to give me reasons why you think the Earth is flat.
>> Okay. Well, let's start with number one.
>> Yeah.
>> Feel any motion?
>> Sorry.
>> You feel any motion?
>> It depends on what scenario I'm in. If I'm like, you know, jogging, I'm certainly gonna feel motion. If I'm like on a plane or if I'm just sitting in my if I'm if I'm on a plane or if I'm just sitting in my office, I won't feel any motion.
>> It's not >> unless there's an earthquake or there's turbulence.
>> Can I speak?
>> I was answering your question.
>> You didn't answer the question.
>> I just did. I told you that I do I I said I do feel motion >> when I'm like jostling around like if I'm jogging or if I'm on an airplane and there's turbulence, but I don't feel motion when I'm sitting at my desk or when I'm sitting in a smooth smoothly flying airplane.
>> That's not why I asked you. Do you >> So the answer is that is that sometimes we feel motion, sometimes we don't.
>> Can I >> Are you ask if you're asking me do I feel specifically the Earth's motion?
No. No. Humans aren't capable of doing that. Okay, that's that's that's good cuz we can both I don't feel it to. Do you feel the Earth rotating the Sun at 67,000 miles?
>> No. And we don't expect that you should be able to.
>> Is that a yes or a no?
>> I said no. And we don't expect you to be able to >> because that that is what's called that is what's called geodic motion. Geodisic motion is non accelerating.
>> And so if you if it's non- accelerating then that's the kind of motion that can't be felt.
>> Okay. So we both agree on the first two points. Yeah, >> sure. Now let me ask you a question.
>> Okay.
>> Can we detect can we detect the motion of the earth, the rotation of the earth using the corololis effect?
>> You asked two questions. I should get at least one.
>> Well, let me let me just finish it off.
>> Okay. Yeah, sure.
>> The galaxy through the universe at one point.
>> No, that's geodeic motion. We don't feel velocity. We feel acceleration. And geodic motion doesn't involve acceleration.
Okay. Is it you have your script then?
>> Cool. You've gone over your script. Can I ask you some questions now?
>> Can I just finish what I >> I thought that that was your last question.
>> Is it fair to >> Yeah. Let me if I could just finish.
>> Sure.
>> Is it fair to say then because you don't detect no motion at all that you just believe in what you're told?
>> No. Because we can measure the motion.
>> There's no no no science in history has ever measured any motion.
>> Sure. There is. I'm happy to tell you about it, but you didn't want me to tell you about it apparently.
>> So, what was your question?
>> Yeah. So, do you believe that we can measure the corololis effect?
>> I stick to a belief is based on nothing.
>> Yeah. You >> So, that's not answering my question.
You accused me of dodging. Now, it sounds like you're dodging.
>> Do you believe that we can measure the Corololis effect?
No.
>> Okay. So, when we perform an experiment using something called a Compton generator, it's a device invented about 100 years ago.
It sounds like you think that the observed phenomenon inside the Compton generator, it's just a tube filled with water basically, that that is made up.
Okay. Okay. So, let let me start by saying if the Earth is rotating >> Mhm.
>> orbiting >> Bro's not going to answer.
>> She's going for the universe.
I I I didn't interrupt you.
>> Well, to be clear, you did, >> but I'll let it slide. Go ahead.
Can I?
Okay. So, if the Earth is rotating and we're orbiting the Sun and the galaxy's going through the universe, why is it that we only see the stars going in one motion and the motion we detect is the slowest motion?
>> Oh, we don't only see the stars moving in one direction.
>> We do.
>> No, I can show you a video >> stars before. I can show you a video of us of us seeing stars move year over year.
>> This is like this is these are these are >> photographs of the sky where the stars are moving relative to one another.
>> You got to come up and >> don't let people speak.
>> I'm addressing what you just said.
>> Can I speak?
>> Do you want me to address what you said or would you rather just repeat your script and hope that you can get a thousand people to say it? You said that the stars move.
>> You said that the star that we only see the stars motion, the slowest of the stars motion. Correct.
>> Correct.
>> That's false. We see other stars motion.
We see other kinds of motion aside from just the daily motion.
>> The Do we see the stars going in free motions?
>> Sorry. Do we see the stars going in what motions?
The this the earth is supposed to be rotating, orbiting, and going through the going through the universe. Yep.
>> But we only detect one mode.
>> Actually, we detect all three.
>> Look, you don't let anyone talk, mate.
>> You finished talking.
>> We only see the stars going in.
>> Can I finish? Like >> stars going in one.
>> Maybe there's a delay here.
>> I don't think there's no delay. You just don't want me to speak.
>> I'm just responding when you stop talking.
>> Can I speak now?
>> Yeah, go ahead and then I'll speak and I'll indicate why you're wrong. Go ahead.
>> Okay. We only see the stars going in one motion and the motion we see is the slowest one. The stars form circles circular motion of the stars. Yeah.
>> You done?
>> Yeah. Okay, so we actually see the stars moving in three distinct motions, right?
So we see the daily motion of the stars.
So over the course of a night, we see the Earth's rotation causing the apparent location of the stars to change. Over the course of a year, when we're on different sides of the sun, we see different stars in the night sky. So over the course of a year, the stars drift out of sight. They drift over to the day side as opposed to the night side. And over the course of many years, we can see individual stars moving relative to other stars. And I can show you a video of that. It's actually quite fascinating. This is a video of uh >> 61 61 Signi. Well, I mean, yeah, this is this is an example of >> a video proof of anything.
>> I mean, this is evidence of the stars moving relative to one another. So, here >> I've got a video.
>> Cool your uh cool your jets. This is just this is just standard astronomical data. You can see that >> I've got a video of Superman fly Superman flies.
>> Do you see the uh stars moving?
>> I just asked you. There's a video proving.
>> So So instead of dodging, why don't you just answer the question? Do you see this? Can you see what's behind me?
>> I'm asking you does a video.
>> Please don't answer my question with a question. Just answer the question.
>> Can you see it? If you can't see it, then I just need to fix it or something.
Okay, great. So what you're seeing >> I can see your video.
>> What what you're seeing are photographs one year apart from each other over or over the course of uh started in 2013 and ended in 2020. Sorry. So that's over the course of eight years.
>> This is these are >> these are eight photographs each one from 2012. One from 2012 through to 2020.
>> Yes, these are photographs. These are photographs.
>> And where did this photograph come from?
>> The all we know is the username of the person who took them. They're anonymous, but you can go find it on Wikipedia as well.
>> You don't even know who took.
>> This is actually like these stars are well documented, so you can go find other resources. This is just a good resource.
>> Who took this photo?
>> So, it's it says down at the bottom it's individantis.
I'm answering your question.
>> I need not answer my question. Just it was taken by individant.
>> Who took that photo?
>> Well, I do. They go by Individus Observant.
>> I don't even know.
>> It says to show you a video of Bigfoot.
>> It says who took it, right?
>> Show you a video video of Bigfoot. Does that mean video?
>> It says who took it. We know who took it. Individous observantis.
>> If I showed you a video of Bigfoot, does that mean Bigfoot existed?
>> It would certainly be evidence. It would certainly be evidence of it.
>> What about Superman flying? Would that be evidence that >> if if this if this was if this was proposed to be like video evidence or you know videography that was taken out there in the world and rather than produced in a you know in Paramount or something I don't know who owns Superman then yeah that would be >> Do you believe in Do you believe in Bigfoot? Do you think there's evidence >> because I think that the evidence isn't particularly compelling but it's still evidence.
>> What What about a lot less monster?
>> So wait a minute. Are we just saying that video evidence Are we just saying that video evidence is no good anymore?
But I'm telling you video is no evidence of anything. Yeah.
>> Okay. So video evidence is no good. So fortunately this is a well doumented phenomenon. It's not just this video that has these stars moving. The speed of 61 signi across the speed of 61 signi across the sky has been measured for over a hundred years.
>> It's been it was actually the first star or the first in this case it was a pair of stars to to have its motion measured going back almost 200 years. So this is extremely well documented. We have extraordinary evidence for this. Sorry, CGI going back to 1838.
>> We we we got tremendous evidence of videos of Bigfoot. So you're telling me you could believe that?
>> Fortunat for Fortunately, we actually used the scientific method to examine the evidence. And here we see that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the case that this is real. Considering that you could measure this yourself, this is something like we all have access to the same sky. You could just get a telescope and look at it yourself, right?
>> I heard you say that the Earth is rotating and it pulls the atmosphere with it. Is that correct?
>> Yeah, that's correct. But, uh, I'm not going to let you pivot. So, to be clear, we do see three different motions for the Earth. We see the rotation of the Earth about its axis over the course of a day. We see the change in the constellations over the course of a year. And we see the individual stars moving relative to each other year over year. You don't see the stars going in three motions, right?
>> Yeah, we do. I just told you the three motions that we have >> and you're just saying, "Nuh-uh."
Because you don't know how to contest the evidence that I've given you.
>> Okay, let's start with the Earth rotating and it's pulling the atmosphere.
>> Okay. So, we're going to deflect and pivot because you don't know how to acknowledge the uh the data or the evidence, the explanation I just gave you. Even >> you just said, "Nuh-uh. That's as good as Bigfoot."
>> No, I didn't. Uh-uh.
>> Yeah, you did. said we don't see the stars going in three motions.
>> We did and I and I told you what the three motions are. I told you what the three motions are.
>> On a slow time lapse on a slow time lapse that stars go in a circular motion.
>> Yeah. So that you're seeing the fastest motion first.
>> Correct.
>> And then once you account once you So so we we agree that the fastest motion is going to be the dominant motion, right?
>> But you don't the fastest the fastest motion.
Sorry. The fastest motion >> the fastest motion. Oh, this is so embarrassing for you. So, the fastest motion is going to be the thing that produces the largest effect on the sky.
And the Earth's rotation will produce the largest effect on the sky.
You don't measure the position of a you don't measure the position of a star in miles hour. You measure it in degrees per hour or rather mill arc seconds per per year. That's how you measure the motion of a star. And that's an angular motion. Now the Earth's angular motion is >> the Earth's angular motion is 360 degrees per or per day, which is 15° hour, which is faster than any other angular motion for any other celestial body that we can observe.
>> So yes, we see the fastest motion. And then if you want to cancel out that fastest motion to check to see if there's other motions, you just look at the same time of the day every or the same time of the night every night. And then because the you'll be at the same place, the same orientation, then you can look how the stars change from night to night. And that's your second motion because we see that the stars the constellations change over the course of a year. And then if you want to see if there's even a a further motion beyond that, what you do is you look at the same day, the same time, year over year.
So that it's not a result of the Earth's first motion, the spinning. It's not a result of the Earth's second motion, the Earth's trajectory around the Sun. It's a result of the stars themselves moving >> or perhaps.
>> You're trying to prove that the Earth is a globe and not debunking that the Earth is flat.
>> I was addressing your confusion. I was addressing your confusion that we don't see three motions because we do see three motions. You were just mistaken.
>> I heard you say earlier that the Earth is rotating and it's pulling the Earth.
It's pulling the atmosphere around the Earth at the same time.
>> He will never address what I said.
>> Well, you've addressed it yourself.
>> Okay. So, you agree with me that we see the three motions of the Earth then?
>> No, we don't.
>> We see perfect stars. Then which part which part of what I just explained do you not agree with?
>> Which part?
>> Well, I've told you do we only see the stars go in one motion and it's in a circular motion.
>> So why is it between different days? So if it's say I don't know it's Monday where I live right now. Um, if I go out at midnight or let's say I go go out at 11:00 p.m. on Monday and I take a look at where all the stars are and then I go out at 11:00 p.m. on Tuesday and I take a look at where the stars are and then I do the same thing every day and I map where the stars are. I take a picture, say, why is it that the stars are in different places on different days?
>> The stars are going around in a circular motion.
>> Why are they in different places at different days? You're not addressing my question. two seconds and then you do a monologue >> because you're about to not you're about to not answer my question but go ahead and avoid answering my question. Let's do it for safe arguments. I just agree with you for safe arguments. Let's just agree with let's crack on to the next thing.
>> Okay, good. I'm glad you can rotate.
>> Well, yeah, let's agree to disagree.
>> So, you don't agree with me then? Then we should stay on top >> to the next. You're trying to debunk me.
>> The earth is rot. You said the Earth is rotating and it's pulling the atmosphere at the same time, correct? In the same direction.
>> Yeah. So, I'm just going to note down really quick. Um, 1 hour 35 minutes into my live stream, Jibberjabber has admitted defeat on the three motions of the Earth and wants to pivot to another topic. Okay, got it. Go ahead.
>> All right then. So you said that the earth is rotating and it's pulling the atmosphere at the same time in the same direction as the earth is revolving.
Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Why is it then that winds blow in all different directions? The clouds go in different directions and all the wind blows in different directions. How can it blow in different directions if the gravity is pulling the atmosphere at the same speed as the earth is rotating?
Over to you. All of the winds are just deviations from the average motion.
That's all they are. So, if you have a wind that is slightly slower than the average motion, then it'll look like it's going west. If you have a wind that is slightly faster than the I thought I thought we weren't I thought we weren't interrupting each other. If you have a wind that's going f slightly faster than the average motion, it will go east. If the uh wind is going in a slightly different direction than the average motion, then it could be going north or south.
>> Gravity over gravity. things can move even under the influence of gravitational pole. I don't understand your question.
>> I thought you said it was pulling the whole atmosphere around >> at the same speed as the Well, it's not.
The wind can go in the opposite direction.
>> Wait a minute. To be clear, I didn't say that.
>> Can I please speak?
>> I didn't. Well, well, you're mischaracterizing me. I'll clarify that >> I'll clarify because you're mischaracterizing me.
>> So, the Earth's gravity is what keeps the wind or keeps the atmosphere in place. It's what keeps, you know, the atmosphere from flying off. And it is the drag produced by the earth.
>> You're muting me.
>> Yeah, I did because I have to clarify.
It's the drag produced by the rotation of the earth that causes the atmosphere to move with the earth.
>> Why does the wind blow in the opposite direction as the earth is rotating?
>> It doesn't. It just blows slightly slower or slightly faster.
>> Wind blow in all different directions.
>> So when the wind is blowing west >> that the wind >> when the wind is blowing west, it does not mean that the wind is not rotating with the earth. It just means it's rotating slightly slower. saying >> why are you clarifying rather than just asking me to clarify?
>> Because you're pivoting.
>> I'm I'm literally answering your question, but you're misrepresenting my view.
>> Blow in the opposite direction is rotating >> relative to what >> does relative to the earth.
>> So relative to the surface of the earth surely. Yes. To the surface of the earth. Yeah.
>> Blow it in the >> Can you let someone speak?
>> I'm answering your question.
>> Up here. You want to know why I think >> you've interrupted me plenty by the way?
If you want to have a conversation where we interrupt each other, that's fine.
But don't get don't get all don't get all high and mighty when you interrupt me, too.
>> Does the does the wind blow in the opposite direction as the earth is rotating >> relative to the surface of the earth?
Absolutely. Relative to the core of the earth. No.
>> Sorry. One more time. You cut out.
>> Why does the wind blow in the opposite direction as the earth is rotating? Are you asking >> pulling it magically pulling it round?
>> So gravity is not what's making it go in a circle. That would be friction. And the reason why the wind can blow in any direction is because the winds are caused by localized phenomena. So you have like localized heating of the ground can cause winds to flow because you can have low pressure environments and high pressure environments. And depending on where the low pressure and high pressure um regions are of the atmosphere, you'll have wind flowing from high pressure to low pressure across the surface of the earth. And if that means it's going from east to west, then it's going from east to west relative to the surface of the earth.
That doesn't mean that relative to the center of the earth that the west that the winds that blow west are actually going around in the opposite direction.
They're going in the same direction just slower.
>> So it you're telling me it's not the gravity that's pulling the atmosphere along with the Earth.
>> No, the gravity pulls the atmosphere to the Earth. Friction pulls the atmosphere along the Earth.
All right, let's go on to number three.
>> Okay, so pivoting again. Let me write that down. Is the horizon a physical thing?
>> One sec. I gota I got to write this down. Um, jibber jabber.
>> Yeah, write it down.
>> Pivot again after about what my original claim was about the atmosphere. Okay, cool. What are we pivoting to now?
>> Jibber lost. Jibber lost. Right, let's go on to number three.
>> Definitely.
>> Right. All right, then. Water large bodies.
>> Wait a minute. Hold on. Jibber Jabber, just a quick question.
>> Why do you get to ask me questions? Why don't I get to ask you questions?
>> Because you're de debunking me.
>> Yeah. So me debunking you would involve me asking you questions, not the other way around.
>> Just write down I was right there.
>> So I am debunking you. You're right. I'm glad that we agree. So Jibberjabber, why do sunsets look like the sun is going down rather than the sun is going further away?
>> Okay. Okay. Do you know how your eye works?
>> Yeah.
>> Let's talk about perspective. You know perspective?
>> Yeah, sure. I know about perspective.
>> Vanishing point of your eye.
>> Absolutely.
>> You know about the vanishing point of your eye.
>> Yep.
>> You can only see so far, right?
>> Uh that's not how perspective works.
>> Let me just finish. Let me just finish the monologue.
>> I'm sorry. Was that a question that you asked or was it a rhetorical question?
>> No. No, I hadn't finished.
>> Well, you said you said, "Do you know how perspective works?" That sounds like a question to me. So, I was trying to answer. Well, I was going to follow on with that.
>> Okay. So, instead of asking a question, just say things and then I can respond to the things rather than asking questions if you don't want responses to them. Okay.
>> Okay. Well, let's keep it short and sweet. All right. Your eye works due to perspective. You have a natural vanishing point. Yeah. So, the horizon is horizontal. It is flat. The horizon is about 3 and 1/2 miles out. If you're standing on the beach, the the horizon will be 3 and 1/2 miles out. The horizon isn't a physical thing. The higher you go, the further you can see, but you can only see so far. Can I ask you something? How far is the news?
>> I'm sorry. Was this Was this supposed to address my question?
>> Because my question was, why is it >> asking a question?
>> Oh, no, no. I'm sorry. You were in the middle of answering my question. I asked you why JJ, I'm sorry I have to mute you, but I asked you why is it that sunsets look like the sun is going down rather than further away?
>> That was my question, and you didn't answer it. Because it's going >> the further away something gets, the nearer to the horizon it gets. Due to perspective, >> you just blowing from stupid down.
>> So I asked you why does it look like it's going down and it doesn't look like it's going further away and you said because it's going further away.
>> Because it's due to perspective.
>> So it looks like it's going down and it doesn't look like it's going further away. Because it's going further away.
>> Was that a question? I thought you was asking me a question.
>> Yeah. Well, I'm just blown away by how dumb the thing is. You just said >> courtesy to let some You keep muting, don't you?
>> I didn't mute courtesy when you asked me a question to listen to the answer.
>> That's so ironic that you're saying that because literally asked you to let me answer your question two seconds ago and you said no, I had more to say.
>> All right. And things seem to appear to go downwards the further that you they go away. So as they get further away, >> you're just going to keep muting me.
>> I didn't mute you. I just talked over you. What else happens as they get further away?
If the sun is overhead, the further away it goes into the distance, the lower it seems to appear on the horizon.
>> What else happens?
>> Well, look, you're not listen. You're not just I'm listening. That's why I'm asking what else happens.
>> You're not listening. You're just overalking someone. You got someone who knows a bit a bit more than anyone else.
>> Oh, that's been Do you think that that's what's happening here?
>> Like you're looking down a long corridor. like you're looking down a long corridor. The floor will look like it's rising. The ceiling will look like it's coming down. And the walls will look like they're narrowing until it comes to the vanishing point where all they all converge, right?
>> Yeah. So, what else happens when things get further away?
>> Yeah. They get lower into the horizon.
>> What else happens?
>> What else happens when things get further away?
>> I don't know. You tell me.
>> Uh, hold on. Maybe I can I have something that might help explain what I'm getting at. Um, one sec. One sec.
I'm just gonna This might This might help. One sec. Let me Let me play something for you. Okay.
>> I got I got you. I'm going to mute you just that way then we can listen to it together. Okay. And then you can unmute.
This isn't to try to shut you up. Just >> more indoctrination.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Small far away.
>> I forget. Uh, that's very educational.
>> So, so and you know if you need it again if you need it again I can give it to you.
>> You want to mock? Yeah, give it again.
>> Far away.
>> Right.
>> Far away.
>> Here's your scientific explanation.
>> That's your scientific explanation. Is it >> one last time?
>> These are small.
>> Those are small.
>> But the ones out there are far away.
>> And this is educ This is educational.
Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. So small. We're talking about why things drop down near the horizon. Okay. So, so you understand why the sun drops down to the horizon.
>> So, so you understand. Can you answer my question now? What else happens? I agree. Things get lower in the sky as they get further away. What else happens as they get further away?
>> Due to perspect Yeah. Due to perspective, what else happens? Yeah.
What else happens?
>> Okay.
>> Jibberjabber. What else happens?
>> Agree on that.
>> What else happens as they get further away? Well, information box you tell me.
>> I will let father Ted tell you >> small far away.
>> Okay. So, is that scientific? Is that your scientific?
>> So, what else? What else happens as things get further away?
>> I don't know. You >> You want to play it again?
>> I thought it was due to perspective.
>> I'm asking when things get far away. I agree. Things get lower in the sky. What else happens?
>> Yeah. Till the vanish.
>> What else happens to the way the thing looks?
>> It drops down to the horizon.
>> It gets lower. I agree. What else happens?
>> Does the sun look smaller as it gets further away?
>> Small far away.
>> Looks as it gets further away. So when things get further away as it gets further away when So >> does the sun get >> Why are you asking me a question when I'm trying to ask you a question?
>> I'm asking you a question on what's going on for your video. Does the sun look smaller as it gets further away?
>> No.
>> No. So what are you talking about then?
>> So I don't know about you, but I just got one.
>> I don't know about you, Jibberjabber.
I'm sorry. I'm addressing what you said.
I don't know about you, Jibberjabber, but when I learned art in middle school and high school and they were teaching us linear perspective, we learned that when things are further away, they're smaller.
Get that? Small, far away, >> small.
>> As the sun gets smaller, it goes further away. Yeah. The sun, >> it doesn't. That's how we know it's >> further it gets away.
>> It It doesn't. That's how we know the sun isn't getting further away.
>> Smaller as it goes further away.
>> It doesn't. That's how we know >> the sun gets smaller further away.
>> What are you talking about?
>> That's how we know the sun isn't getting.
>> You just contradicted yourself then.
>> No, you just contradicted yourself. It just shows that the sun's not getting further away.
>> You just contradicted yourself. Mom, one point for Ja.
>> No.
>> All right.
>> No. See, and I I get that you don't understand this, but the fact that it doesn't get smaller means it's not your contradicted yourself. You said when things get further away, they get smaller. And I said, "Does the sun get smaller?" And you said, "No."
>> That's because the sun's not getting further away.
>> Oh, no. So, it's not going further away.
>> No. The Earth is spinning.
>> No. So, is the Earth nearer as it's overhead?
>> Is the Earth nearer? Do you mean is the sun nearer? No. It's the same.
>> It's the same distance. It's 93 million miles, give or take.
water or at large.
>> Man, this is so bad.
>> Always finds its own distance.
>> Oh my god, the pivot completely after getting obliterated. Okay, I got to write this one down.
>> You just said you just said the sun doesn't get smaller.
>> Wait, hold on. 148 yourself.
>> Uh, jibber jabber gets further away gets smaller and completely obliterated >> on sun.
>> Yeah, you write this down.
>> Not getting confirmation >> with your brain though. It's getting further away. So, let me So, just to be clear, do things get f Do things get smaller as they get further away?
>> Yeah, that's what you said.
>> Wait a minute. Hold on. Jibber Jabber.
Do you think that things get smaller when they get further away?
>> Well, that's what you're saying.
>> I'm asking you, Jibberjabber. This is basic perspective. I'm asking you, buddy.
>> I'm asking you. Does the sun get smaller to get Well, the sun's not getting further away.
>> There you go then.
>> The sun's not getting further away.
Jibberjabber. Now, let me ask you this, Jibberjabber. If I to do you know you know when a plane flies overhead jibberjabber >> jibberjabber you know when a plane flies overhead >> you know when a plane flies overhead it's bigger and then when it's further away it gets smaller.
Why does that happen?
Because it gets further is going further away.
>> And so it getting further away is the reason why it gets smaller. Why doesn't the sun get smaller then?
>> Because it's not getting further away.
>> So it's at the same It's at the same distance all year round. Yeah.
>> Yeah. That's cuz it's cuz the earth is spinning.
>> That's why it goes down. Not flat.
>> You got it. I'm glad we agree. Welcome to the globe.
>> We don't agree on nothing.
>> I know. I know. Because you're struggling to understand here. But I think the rest of the chat has seen that like, oh, you finally get it now. No, he doesn't.
No, you're totally wrong.
>> So planes get smaller because they get further away.
>> Talk about airplanes. You want to talk about airplanes?
>> Yeah. Yeah. So, airplanes get smaller because they get further away.
>> Do we detect any curvature any curvatur?
>> Why are you interrupting me? So, airplanes get smaller when they get far away, but the sun doesn't get smaller.
But the sun doesn't get smaller when it gets further away.
>> What's the difference between those two things?
>> Have you seen any curvature?
>> I'm sorry. I don't know why the I I I apologize for the middle of my sentence interrupting the beginning of your sentence, but maybe you can just answer my question.
>> Maybe you can just maybe just answer my question rather than trying to pivot because I want to know what's the distinguishing feature between an airplane and the sun. So that an airplane gets smaller as it gets further away. But the sun, it doesn't get smaller, it gets as it gets further away. What's the difference?
>> The sun gets smaller, does it? Yeah, throughout the year. Sometimes you can have a big moon. Sometimes you can have a small moon.
>> Wait, we're talking about the sun, not the moon, dumbass.
>> So, how does where does the sun set then, >> dumbass?
>> The sun sets roughly in the west because the earth rotates away from it.
>> Also, your rhetoric skills need some work. You can't just say what I said.
>> The sunset beyond the horizon.
>> Yeah, of course.
>> Sunset beyond the horizon.
>> Of course, of course it does. How far is the horizon? If I was standing on the beach, how far is the horizon away?
>> Uh, it depends on how tall you are, but like for a short king like you, probably like 2 and 1/2 miles.
>> 2 and 1/2 miles.
>> Well, yeah. I I assume you're like 5 foot one.
>> So, if we look forward, it's 2 and 1/2 miles. And if we look back, it's 2 and a half.
>> Well, if you're in the middle of the ocean. Yeah.
So the sun goes overhead and disappears below the horizon at 2 and 1/2 miles where the light diminishes. Is that what you're saying?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. At 2 and a half miles.
>> Yep. Well, for short kings like you.
Yeah.
>> And the sun and and the Earth is rotating at 1,000 mph.
>> Well, it's rotating once per day, which is pretty.
>> So, how long should we see how long should we see the sun in the sky if there's only a 5 mile distance and the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph? Well, the sun moves at 15 degrees across the sky per hour.
>> Yeah. Is let's stick on speed. I don't >> I don't measure speed in degrees.
>> Well, that I'm I'm glad we agree because we don't measure the rotation of the Earth in a speed either. We measure it in degrees per hour.
>> So, how is it if the horizon's only 2 and a half miles away and the Earth is rotating at a thousand?
>> Yeah. How comes we how comes we see a lot more daylight if if it if the horizon is only 2 and a half miles.
>> How? Because the sun moves fairly slowly in the sky because the earth is rotating slowly. It rotates only 15° hour.
>> The earth is is going >> fairly,000 miles an hour.
>> 1,000 miles an hour at the equator is a tangential speed. It's not a rotation rate.
>> Okay. How far is the nearest star?
>> Four about four light years away. But I'm not going to let you pivot because apparently you don't understand the difference between angular velocity and rotational and tangential velocity.
>> The sun was >> it is.
>> Yeah. Well, it's not what you just said.
So I assume I just assumed you were referring to distant stars, not the sun.
>> I'm sorry. I assumed wrong. You're right. The sun is 93 million miles away.
>> Yep. Write it down. The jibber jammer.
Here's the thing. Write this down.
>> When you repeat my rhetorical slam dunks, it just makes you look pathetic.
It doesn't make you look clever creative.
>> The sun is a star. Yeah.
>> Yeah. The sun is a star. Absolutely.
>> So, let's let's not let's forget about the sun. Let's concentrate on the other stars behind it. How far are they away?
>> The closest one is about four light years.
>> How far?
>> And how what's that in miles?
>> Uh we don't use miles in space.
>> Well, let's just use miles for the sake of the people in the comments.
>> Okay. Okay, I can do the conversion for you if you want. Um, >> yeah. Yeah, >> it is 23 trillion miles.
Sorry, two Yeah, 23 trillion miles.
Yeah, >> you >> So, if you're on a beach, you can only see the horizon at 2 and a half miles due to perspective. But you think you can see all these trillions of miles away into space?
>> Yeah, obviously stars are really, really bright. I think your eyes What have you got? Superman X-ray eyes or something to see that far.
>> As long as the thing is bright enough, you can see.
>> You wear glasses. Do you see them with your glasses on?
>> Yeah. So, stars are bright. It turns out >> you got X-ray glasses.
>> Yep. My my glasses are X-rays. So, you understand that if the light can get to your eye, then you're going to see it regardless of how far away it is, right?
>> No.
>> Oh, you don't understand that? Well, I can clarify if you want. You want me to educate you?
>> Trillions of miles away. Well, the closest star is about 23. The closest star is about 23 trillion miles.
>> 20 million trillion billion miles. Big numbers scare you.
>> A poor little numbers to try and bamboozle people.
>> No, I was trying to use four light years, but you wanted your glasses.
>> Trillions, billions, >> 23 trillion miles away.
>> How close the nearest star is.
>> You think you can see that far? Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Can you see that far?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Well, but when you're on a beach looking at the horizon due to perspective from how your eye works, the you've got a vanishing point at 2 and >> that's not what the horizon is. The horizon is not due to vanishing points or due to perspective.
>> The horizon is due to the curvatur perspective. We have a natural vanishing point. You're contradicting yourself again.
>> No, the horizon is not a natural vanishing point. It's due to the curvature of the earth.
>> No, it's your the horizon is due to perspective. The higher we go, the further you can see and the horizon's further away.
>> So why would the horizon be further away? It is really due to function of the >> higher the horizon is away.
>> Yep, that's true.
>> Am I correct that the f higher you are, the further you can see?
>> That's true. Absolutely true. So answer me this then.
>> Why would it be that if this was just a feature of our eyeballs, why would it be that you could go higher up and now you can suddenly see further away?
>> Your eyes aren't changing if you go to a higher altitude. So how could you see further away? Due to perspective, how is perspective allowing you to see further away?
>> How is perspective?
>> Elevated off the floor, >> but you're further from it. It should be behind your vanishing point. Now, >> it should be the farther you go, the further you can see, >> right? And then you're just going to say perspective even though that's not how perspective works.
>> Due to perspective, due to perspective.
>> See, I read his mind every rises up.
>> I knew he would say due to perspective in my mind.
>> Yeah, I did. I predicted predicted grenade brainwashing stuff.
>> So the higher you go, the further you can see due to perspective cuz the floor ramps up.
>> Okay. Why would it be the case when the floor actually ramps up? Why doesn't it curve away?
>> Why would it be that the higher up you are?
>> Why is the horizon flat?
>> It's not Why would it be that the higher up you are, the further you can see?
Yeah. Why would it be that the higher up you are, the further was horizontal?
>> No. Why would it be that the higher up you are, the further you can see?
>> It's the horizon horizontal.
>> Why would it be that the higher up you are, the further you can see?
>> No, no. I'm asking what what is it about perspective that makes that the case?
>> How does that work?
>> I want you to educate me because you're clearly so much smarter than I am.
>> Ramps up, the ceiling comes down. Well, you ask me and I'm answering.
>> Yeah, please go ahead.
>> Door ramps up. The seal the ceiling ramps down and you have a natural vanishing point. The higher you go, the further you can see.
Why why is why can you see further? You can see the horizon is about the horizon is about two and a half miles due to perspective.
>> Well, for short things like you see stars for normal people like me, it's like trillion billion gazillion miles away.
>> So, look, I'm really just trying to get you to educate the lowly indoctrinated me about why >> brainwashing. Education is indoctrination.
>> I I know. I I want you to teach me.
Teach me, senpai. Teach me. Why is it that perspective makes the horizon get further away?
>> Someone paying you to come on here and do all this.
>> Why is it that the higher up you go, the further you can see according to perspective? How does perspective work?
So that due to perspective, >> I understand that that's your answer. I want to know I want to know. Oh, angular resolution. That's an answer.
>> That's why things that's why things disappear from the bottom up.
>> So why is it then?
>> You ever seen a P900 camera? You ever seen a P900 Nikon camera? Yeah, of course I haven't seen you. Have you seen them bringing boats back into view again?
>> No, it doesn't happen. Jibberjabber.
Jberjabber. I' I'd love to see boats coming back into view once they go over the horizon.
>> Jibberjabber. I'd love to I'd love to interen when they used a P9.
>> All right, I got to mute you. Um, one sec. There's a particular video that I would love to see that I'd love to pull up. Um, yeah, let's go watch Let's go watch with a P900. Right, Jabber Jabber, you want to go watch a boat go uh over the horizon? Actually, we can even do it with a P1000 rather than a P900.
Do you want to watch a uh a boat get pulled back in with a P1000, which is even better than a P900. By the way, you're teacuped, so I can't hear you.
So, here here we have a boat. In fact, this is quite a large ship. Um here we have a ship. It's a cruise ship, even quite far away. Um it was just entering the channel and starting to move away from the camera. Now, notice how you can see those black dots along along the bottom. And notice how you can see four stacks of windows in the uh like on the ship. Now, this is with a Nikon P1000. It's even better than the Nikon P900, right? So, we're I'm just going to skip forward. So, here we can play that video. I'm in reverse.
>> Yeah. Play the whole video.
>> We are. We're playing the video. Don't worry. Play the whole video.
>> The video is playing.
>> The video is like I'm not doing anything. This is just how the video is.
Now, notice how we can see less of the uh of the dots of these black dots at the bottom. But let's keep playing the video as it gets further away.
>> Yeah, due to how your eye works, due to perspective.
>> But this is a Nikon P1000. I thought that I could zoom it in.
>> Why is >> By the way, pay attention to those red lights here and here.
>> If you was to zoom in further, the bottom of the hole will appear.
>> So, do you see those red lights?
>> Do you see those red lights there?
>> How far is that boat away?
>> Do you see those red lights?
>> How far does How far is the boat?
>> It'll tell us in a second. Do you see those red lights?
>> How far is that?
>> It'll tell us in a second. Do you see those red lights? Do you see those red lights?
>> Not really. No.
>> Okay, I'll make it bigger for you. Do you see them now?
>> Yeah. Make it bigger.
>> Do you see them now? The red lights. So those red lights. Pay attention to those. Okay.
>> Play the video.
>> We Yeah. Yeah. Okay. We will. We will.
Okay. So now another ship bottom up due to perspective.
>> Another ship's Well, I thought that the Nikon P1000 could, you know, pull things back up. Right.
>> There's a ship that's passing in front.
>> You need to zoom in. Need to zoom in further. So this So this is at 8:20 9 km away.
>> Videos. Can I show some videos? Can I show some videos of >> I don't know why we're not why I'm not allowed to finish this video.
>> So this is at uh 8:20 p.m. 9 km away.
Okay.
>> Um so see how So we're not zoomed in right now, but we're going to zoom in in a moment.
>> Well, zoom right back. Let's see the boat disappear.
>> We're working on it. We're working on it. Hold on. So here you can see >> video I want to play next. So you can see that uh it's you know it's pretty small, right?
>> Is that going over the horizon >> now? Where are those black?
>> No, no, no. Play the video.
>> This is the I am I am playing the video.
>> So this is this is the video. This this is the same ship. It's playing >> zoomed in.
>> And then he zooms in. This is the same ship about 9 10 km away.
>> Let's go back again.
>> Let's go back again.
>> All right. Is the horizon flat?
>> The horizon's not flat. No, it's curved.
It's just very slightly curved. So, so here we have here we have the boat zoomed in the video.
>> So, yeah. Yeah. Let's let's let's go back just a second.
>> So, see how I'm going to zoom in really quick.
>> Is that a rise and flat?
>> No, it's slightly curved. Um, I'm going to zoom in really quick. So, see how >> Let's concentrate on that.
>> Why Why are we not focusing on the boat like you wanted us to? So, see how we can only see the We can see like this little black box down at the bottom of the boat here. I don't know if you can see this. It's like this little black box there. We can see that little black box there. And then what we're going to do is we're going to see how much more of the boat we can see once it zooms back in. Okay, >> we'll zoom out.
>> We're We're getting there.
>> That's already been zooming in. Zoom right out >> now. We're zooming in even more.
>> This video you got >> We're zooming in. We're zooming in even more. And see how you can still see the same amount of that black box. In fact, arguably you can see less of it.
>> Arguably you can see less of it even though it's more zoomed in. So somehow zooming in didn't make it appear higher.
It actually made it look the same just bigger.
>> Is the sea ramping up >> is the what >> does it look in that photo?
>> This is not a photo. This is a video >> upwards.
>> This is a video.
>> In that video, does it seem like the vid that the the water is ramping up? Can I play >> the water? The water doesn't ramp up on a globe Earth.
>> Can I play a video 900 camera?
>> So, here we have it at 11.4 km in a in a moment. Be patient. Jibberjabber.
>> We're still looking at this video.
Don't get upset.
>> Be patient. I mean, look, I didn't know I had to talk to you like you were a six-year-old.
>> Don't get upset. Calm down, mate.
>> I'm I'm good, but I have to talk to you like you're a six-year-old, otherwise you won't understand what I'm saying, apparently.
>> So, here we are zoomed in maximally.
This is the max zoom on the P on the P1000. See how you can't see that black box anymore? It is uh you can't see that black box anymore, but you can still see those red lights, right? You can still see those red lights.
>> How far away is that from the person?
>> 11.4 4 km 11.4 km to 11.4 km then.
>> This is 11.4 11.4.
>> This is 11.4 km. Yeah. Zoom doesn't affect how far away you are.
Jibberjabber. What the [ __ ] >> Well, let's go back to where the guy >> I don't control the video. This is a video. I can't zoom in and zoom out.
>> Video you've got of a P9.
>> I can't zoom in and zoom out on a video that already exists. Calm down. video already exists. I can't change it after the fact.
>> Take a break.
>> So, let's keep watching. So, see those?
So, you can see the red lights.
>> Don't get frustr.
>> So, there's a bird that just flew in front. This is about 12 km. Okay.
>> The sack. You're no good at your job.
You're going to >> I am. So, this this video is going to get so many views, by the way.
>> Now, this will be 13 km. No, not yet.
We're almost We're not We're not done yet.
>> Can I play a video?
>> When we're done. Jibberjabber. When we're done with this video, but you have to stop interrupting and you have to watch the damn video. Okay.
>> So, here it is at 14 and a half km. It's getting pretty far away, but we can still see it, right? You can still see the uh >> Wait a second. Where is it?
>> You >> Where is it?
>> Oh, I'm sorry. It was It was on the other Yeah, my bad.
>> That is not zoomed back. You zoomed back on that video.
>> You're right. It's not zoomed out.
>> You zoomed in. You're zoomed in. Yes, this is zoomed in.
>> Yeah, zoom out. Zoom out. Okay, jibber jabber.
>> So, what was it? 11.
>> Jibberjabber. I got I got to ask you.
>> 6 km.
>> I got to ask you, do you think that I can zoom out this video?
>> Well, why don't you get a better video?
>> This is quite a good video in my view.
>> This one >> because it's quite a good video. It shows >> do what I asked you to do.
>> So, here we are maximally zoomed in.
>> Constant zooming in.
>> Well, we're maximally zoomed in right now. Hundreds of videos on YouTube of the P900.
>> Hundreds of videos on YouTube. There's We are maximally zoomed in at this point, right?
>> So, you can still see the lights.
>> Yeah, that's what I mean. I want you to zoom out.
>> Hold on. Hold on. Let me >> I want to see the boat over the horizon.
>> Watch the video jibber jabber and then we can talk about it. Okay.
>> Well, let's zoom out then.
>> This I can't control this video. So, see how >> Well, bring another video.
>> See how you can still see those red lights. See how you can still see those red lights there?
>> That video is not a very good video.
Find another one.
>> See how you can still see the red lights. Can you still see the red lights?
>> Find another Find another video.
>> Jabberjabber. Can you still see the red lights?
>> Find another video. It's not >> All right. He can still see the red lights. He just refuses to answer. So, we're now 15 km out.
The red lights are pretty close to the ocean now. Again, we are at max zoom.
>> It's going to skip to the next distance in just a second.
still see the red lights. Now we're at 19 km at 8:50 p.m.
>> And now you can still see the ship. It's faint, but you can still see it. You can see the windows. Where are the red lights? Where did the red lights go?
>> Where's the boat gone? Can't even see the boat.
>> You can see it. You can see the uh >> the different levels of the ship.
There's the there's there's the four different levels of the ship.
There's some There's some lights at the top of the ship.
>> Oh, you don't like this video? Is wait is is the ship sinking? Why are the red lights below the ocean now?
>> Let's see. Let me go. Let me put a video up much better.
>> I mean, we can clearly see the boat, >> but the red lights are now dipped out of view. It's very puzzling.
Is Is the boat sinking?
Let me get a video >> and we can we can uh >> Can I put a video up now?
>> Uh in a second. We're not done with the video yet. Here. You can still barely see.
>> I put a video up now.
>> We're not done with We Do you have no patience? We're not done with the video yet.
This is around 19 km offshore. The poor light is making it really hard to see uh like or the poor uh the poor conditions, but you can Oh, and that's a separate video. So, what I would like to know is let's see where that where see those red lights.
Did the ship sink? Because those red lights were no longer visible when it got 9 m or 9 km further away.
>> Yeah. No, I can't really see them.
>> No, you can't see the red lights. Okay.
So, you're just blind.
They're right there.
Here, I'll I'll help you out. I'll make them bigger.
Bada boom, bada bing. There's the red lights. See the red lights? See those red lights there? Right there.
>> They were visible up until it got to about 19 km away and then they disappeared. Did the ship sink?
>> Did the ship sink?
>> No. Did it sink?
>> Why couldn't we see the red lights when it got to 19 km away?
>> My turn.
>> Oh, why are you afraid to answer my question?
That would be a yes, huh?
>> You don't get You don't get to show You don't get You don't get to show a video until you can answer these questions.
>> You only get to show your stuff when you let me show my >> That is how that works. Yeah.
>> Is that correct?
>> That is how that works. Yeah.
>> Can I put a video Can I put a video up?
Not until you can answer my question.
>> Then you can mock me about my video.
>> Well, no. Not until you answer my question.
>> I agree with you. Now, can I put my video up?
>> Yeah. Whatever your question was, it's Yeah. Can I put my video up?
>> So, you think the boat sink?
>> I asked you, did the boat sink?
>> Because we can't see the red lights on the ship after it got to 19 km out. So, did the boat sink?
>> I I agree. I agree. Whatever you I agree. I agree with whatever you want to say. I agree. I'm glad that you agree.
Thanks for being here, Chipper Jabber.
>> That's good. Like, y'all, that video that video is going to do numbers on YouTube. That's That's such good content, y'all.
That's so good.
Ah, peace day might be the best video that I've ever produced. Might might be the best debate clip that has has ever or will ever appear on my channel.
Like that might be the best the best of all time even. Um, all right. Let's read some super chats from Broadblow Alves with the five, sorry, 50 Mexican pesos, Mexican dollars. According to my experience, religions and conspiracies arise from a need for for mystery and intrigue fueled by fear and boredom. Mystery salt. Yep, that's roughly true.
From Echipo with the two euros, fourth motion, yearly parallax of closest stars.
Well, that is in some sense the uh second motion, right? Uh from Christopher Sanford with the5s Blitz, I paid for the super chat. Why do you keep interrupting me? Let me speak, Blitz.
Seriously, I'm paying for this. Shut up and let me and let me finish. Oh, I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry, Christopher.
Uh from Spamu with the $5. Blime me, this bloke is belligerent. Indeed, he was. He was very belligerent. Uh from House with the $5. Dr. Blitz, why are you muting me? Let me tell you something. Oh, I should have used that.
That would have been so funny. Uh, I Oh, that would have been so funny.
>> Let me send you a selfie. Let me send you a selfie.
>> It would have been so funny. Ah, I need to work on my uh my sound effect game.
Also, are tornadoes just farts amplified by my lack of understanding. Yes, your lack of understanding amplifies the farts. Um, from Ellie Ellis or from Ellie Ellis's with the two, stop muting me. I will I will stop muting you now that he's gone. Uh, from D Sapphero with the $2. He didn't go to high school. He went to low school. Indeed.
Uh from house with the $70 with sorry with the $5. If anything, sun would seem larger closer to the horizon due to an optical illusion. Gibber is denser than a black hole. Well, black holes don't have to be dense, but yes, they he is denser than the black hole. Dude, the red lights disappear because of the fog.
No. No, they don't.
No, it's because they're lower. In fact, the red lights the red lights are at the lowest deck, and we can't see the lowest deck at that distance.
Um, from normal boy with the 59 Norwegian croners, minus one point for the caller after that. Gotcha. He thought he got you. And bonus negative points for each pivot he did after he proved him wrong. Yep, he got negative I think we calculated negative five points in total. Uh, and from eat some shorts with the $5. There are four lights indeed. Indeed there are. Um, we got this. We can do this. Um, we have the technology.
Why is it muted? Why is it muted?
An intellectual challenge.
This is your take care.
Always a good episode. Uh, from Blancs with the $5. Calm down and let me interrupt you with something extremely stupid. Blitz.
Jeez. Yeah. Yeah. I should have just let him do it, right? Should have just let him do it. Uh, from Christopher Sanford with the five with the five pounds.
Wait, wait, wait. This guy thinks Zoom actually brings things closer. Oh my god, this is comical. He does. And he also thought that I could change the video.
Um, all right. That's all the super chats we got. Let me just double check for cash apps and things of that nature real quick. Uh, we did get a cash app from Connor for the $1. I love how humble and well spoken you are. I appreciate that, but hopefully I didn't change your opinion of me by uh that performance from John uh for the with the $35. Very much appreciated for the blitz.phd domain for a year. Uh, John, I hate to inform you of this. Um, the blitz.phd domain costs $100 a year.
That's the reality. It's a little on the pricey side. And from Shay with the $20 for small, far away. Yeah, the the Father Ted bit is so funny. And not enough people have seen Father Ted. It's such a funny thing. Uh, Grimlock sent $10 for hydration. Teach me senpai had me dying.
If only he would, right? If only he would teach little old me. All right.
Um, and I just want to double check. By the way, if you haven't already, make sure that you uh, you know, follow along on Twitch, following on on both YouTube channels. This is there's the YouTube channel BlitzPHD and the YouTube channel Dr. Blitz Debunks. Follow along on Tik Tok, wherever I am. Make sure to follow along. If you want to see those, um, make sure to go to my website. my website again, blitz.phd. Great domain.
It's like so it's like perfect. If you want to see my website, pretty easy to get to. Here it is.
blitz.phd, right? No.com, justphd. There's a bunch of tabs and stuff. You can see my research if you want. It's like here.
And you can see all the research papers that I've published, uh, an overview.
But if you want to support me, there's a way to do it, and that would just be by clicking one of these buttons down here.
See? See? There's a Patreon and a cash app and a buy me a coffee link. These are all ways to support me. Of course, if you want if you want to. It's cute.
How proud of you. How proud of that URL he has. It is cute because it's so cool.
All right, let's move on to our next guest. Yeah, the PhD is the price point.
Also, it has a short URL name. Um, the Blitz Blitz is only five letters, so it's pretty short.
All right, let us bring up Kermit.
Oh, I missed your super chat. Um, Kermit, can you give me a sec? I just have to go hunt down a super chat from Daryl.
>> Oh, I just wanted to say that dude was hard to listen to.
>> Yeah, tell me about it. Tell me about it, brother.
>> Get off. But hey, I learned a lot. I didn't even know most of that stuff.
>> Now you do. Have a good one, Kermit.
>> All right, man.
>> Daryl, I'm not seeing your super chat.
Um, if one of my mods could post it in the live live chat, that'd be really helpful. I don't know how I missed it.
Yeah, I don't see it coming through anywhere.
Um, I'm so sorry, Darl. If you want to DM me on TikTok or if you want to DM me, DM me on Discord or something like that, um, feel free to ask me it and I'm happy to answer your question.
Um, yeah, now I feel pretty bad. I'm sorry, Darl. I don't know where it went.
Uh, I don't want to.
Okay. Well, Daryl, feel free to DM me or something and we can get something sorted. Sorry about that. From Jamnick with the $2. My wee isn't small. It's far away. There you go. It should be far away. Keep it far away from people unless there's consent. Let's bring up Conflict, who apparently claims to be a scientist.
Love to hear this. Hear that?
>> Conflict. How's it going?
>> Yo, what's up there?
>> Conflict. How old are you?
>> Uh, I am 19.
>> Okay. And you're a scientist?
>> Yeah.
>> You must have been very precocious.
>> I'm going there.
Where did you get this idea that the Earth >> Wait, conflict. Conflict. What shape do you think the Earth is?
>> I think it's flat.
>> Okay. You think it's flat? Okay, cool.
So, what did you ask? You asked what?
Where did you get your idea that the earth is round?
>> Oh, from all the scientific evidence that's available to me.
>> Or maybe have you ever thought that maybe you got brainwashed into it?
>> How would I get brainwashed into >> like >> observing ault pendulum?
>> Like all these facts you're presenting, they like hold nothing.
>> So I've seen a focal pendulum with my own two eyes. I've watched a >> I've I've watched people conduct a Cavendish experiment and I've conducted one myself. It was kind of non-sophisticated, but like >> what how how am I getting brainwashed by things I've seen myself?
>> Cuz these are not seen. They're not actual proof. I can present actual proof.
>> So the fult pendulum is do you know what it is? Do you know what a fult pendulum is?
>> No.
>> Okay. So how do you know it's not actual proof?
>> Cuz it's most uh scientists or like people with P PhDs like they just basically their facts. They get it from their ass. They just say >> you don't know. So, so how do you know what a focal pendulum is?
>> I don't know what that is, but I do know that. So, how do you know it's fake? And I can back it up.
>> How do you know the focal pendulum is fake or isn't evidence?
>> If you don't know what it is, >> can I tell you?
>> Yeah, please tell me how you know the focal pendulum is not real evidence.
Please start by addressing what the focal pendulum is and which parts do not contribute to the evidence that's available.
>> Before I get there, can I start with this? Do you know what neoliberian plan is?
>> Damn it, he got us.
You guys baited me. You baited me. You told me that he was a scientist. You baited me. I got jabbaited.
It was so good. You know what? Don't even ban him. He earned that.
He earned that one.
Yeah, he might be the goat of trolling.
Uh, from Ellie L's with the 5-year-old.
Honestly, a bit out of the loop. I did notice you saying your government name in a video and was surprised your actual name is Blitz. So, cool. Actually, yeah.
Yeah. So, um, since I launched the website, which was about a month ago, um, um, you know, we, uh, we are now deanonymized. Um, somebody asked, um, what was the what was the gut? So, neolbertarian philan uh, philangism is like a meme political philosophy.
There's just like a bunch of people who use this as like a troll for uh Parker.
You guys know Parker, get a job. Um people will basically come up and ask him his thoughts on neolbertarian philangism. And um it's it's just like a bit. And he got me. He got me by getting to say the bit.
He baited me into letting him say the bit. Uh all right, let's bring up uh Do I have any guests? No, I have no guests on Discord. Let's bring up Duda. Duda Dippity. Is that a word? Is that a name?
>> Hey, >> Duda Dippity. How's it going?
>> Good. How you doing?
>> I'm doing all right. Due to Dippity, what shape do you think the Earth is?
>> Uh, well, first of all, it's not round.
>> Okay. What shape? Well, be dumb to think that wasn't my question. My question was, what shape do you think it is, not what shape do you think it's not?
>> It's an oblate spheroid, obviously. All right.
>> It's not round.
>> Go on. Get off. By the way, oblate spheroids are round. Obviously y'all mods ban him. He's gone. He's gone. Get him out of here.
He's been had.
You mods, you're doing your great. Um, so currently the guest box is empty. I guess all of the flat earthers who were watching were so embarrassed by jibberjabber that they just dipped out of the guest box because we did have like 10 or so guests and they all left because I guess they didn't want to be associated with the embarrassing demonstration that Jibberjabber gave.
All right, let's talk to Ch. Uh, let's talk to Xavier.
Xavier, how's it going?
>> Oh, sorry about that. Um, that was an accident.
>> All right. Thanks for being here. Let's talk to Chainsaw Man.
>> Chainsaw Man. Chainsaw Man does whatever a chainsaw can. How's it going? What shape do you think the Earth is?
>> I think the Earth is flat.
>> Why do you think so?
>> Um, well, for one, I I I don't believe in gravity, first of all. So, I'm not sure how the Earth would form itself.
>> Why do things fall down?
>> Because the Earth is moving upwards.
>> Oh, you're not a flat earther. It's a good troll, though. Good control attempt.
>> No, I am.
>> No, no, I mean it's a good troll attempt. Flat earthers don't think the Earth is moving upwards anymore. Um, yeah, like they think that it's due to density and buoyancy. Yeah, he was he was pretty clearly trolling trolling.
Um, yeah, like that's that's what I think that some uh flat-earthers like 30 years ago used to say that, but they don't think that anymore.
No, they don't believe in gravity either. They just think that there's buoyancy and density or something. And then they say something about electromagnetism.
Um, but it doesn't actually like do what they want.
So, currently guest box is empty.
You should actually get a nose ring now to gaslight that guy. That'd be so funny. Um, so currently we are Do you guys ever have a feeling that something's on your teeth? But I don't actually think anything is on my teeth.
I I don't know how something would have gotten on my teeth just now because it's not like I was eating. I I have to shave my teeth once a week.
That's That is psychotic. By the way, I literally brush my teeth before the live stream.
I All right, the people have spoken.
Jibberjabber, do you want to come back up?
Jibberjabber, if you want to come back up, you can. I I promise I won't I won't I won't mute you.
I'll let you show your video.
Oh, it is hair time. You're right.
All right, y'all. It doesn't seem like he wants to come up. Anyway, I wasn't going to uh let him talk and I also wasn't going to uh I wasn't going to let him show his video. I was just going to mute him and then when he tried to turn on his camera, I was I was going to turn it off. Don't worry. Um don't worry. He was I was just going to do a a little bit of light trolling.
We do we do a little bit of light trolling here.
All right, let us talk to JL MD.
JLMD.
JLMD, how's it going?
That was kind of loud. Um, Tik Tok mods, please do your thing.
Get him out of here. And he's gone.
Don't worry. We'll get him there. Well, look. Scared my dog. Yeah. I'm sorry.
I'm sorry about that.
Caleb is a light snack for Blitz. Well, look, I don't know if you learned from your parents, but um you're not supposed to eat rotten food, so why would I snack on something so rotten? Let's talk to Robnoxious.
Rob Noxious, how's it going?
>> Hey, how you doing?
>> I'm doing all right, Robnoxious, what do you think the Earth is?
Uh, it's flat.
>> Why do you think so?
>> Because I have never seen no curve.
Where's the curve at? Show me a picture of the curve.
>> Okay. How How about a video? Would that be better?
>> Whatever you can do. Show me the curve.
>> Yeah. Okay. One sec.
Here it is. Actually, do we like the Yeah, let's do the messos.
>> The best one you got. Show me the curviest.
>> One sec. Let me pull it up. Um, actually, we can do even better than that. Let's do this one.
>> We're about to go full curved in here.
>> Uh, I know that there is a >> Look how many there is, everybody. Look how >> There's There's a specific There's a specific one I'm looking for. I'm just looking through my >> I know. I know.
>> Oh, you do? Okay. I think it's called Mage. Um, it's And because there's a there's a really nice um Yeah, here it It's hard to choose from thousands, right? There's thousands.
>> There's one that's like there's one that's like really really obvious because they did a really good job controlling for it. Here, let me show you.
>> Yeah. Okay. Here comes the full curve, guys. Get ready for the full curve.
>> Yep.
See that curve?
>> Okay. Can you show me the curve? Where's it at? Point it up.
>> Yeah, it's it's it's this bit here.
>> Oh, the fisheye lens curve. I gota >> Oh, okay. So, if it was a fisheye lens, wouldn't these taught ropes, wouldn't they also be curving?
>> Oh, there's ropes in space.
>> These are attached to the balloon in front of the camera.
>> Oh, in space, huh?
>> Oh, this is on a high altitude balloon.
>> That looks about 130,000 feet, right?
>> Um, probably around there. It's 38,000 meters.
>> Yeah. How cold is it up there?
>> I don't know. Seems kind of irrelevant.
Oh, actually, it says it says in this photo it's 5.5 degrees C.
>> Apparently, >> not that cold, actually. Not that cold, right?
>> Apparently not. But look, instead of instead of trying to deflect here, you see the curvature and then you see some you see some taut strings.
>> You see some taut strings.
>> See these strings are these are strings.
They're taught. They're in front of the camera.
>> Yeah. So now we're down to small earth theory. So the earth is small now because that really is like a a tiny a tiny visualization of the earth looking down on it. You're telling me to see the curve.
>> This is quite a large earth actually.
That's why the curve is so slight.
>> Well no the earth is big but you can't see the curve but now you can see it in a small picture.
>> Well the I can make the picture bigger or smaller. That's that's not that's not really important. The important point is that you can see the curve from 38 km up and you can tell that it's not >> to be a curve. Oh, you don't think that?
Wait, you don't think that that's curved?
>> No.
>> Do you want me to like get out paint and show you that it's curved? Would that help?
>> Like look, I from your voice it sounds like you're kind of old. Have you like checked your prescription recently for your glasses?
>> Because like that's obviously curved.
And if you don't think it's curved, I guess I can prove it to you that it is.
Um, let me >> That's not a picture of curvature.
You're just showing a curved object. We don't know what that's looking at. Where is that looking?
>> It's It's looking at the planet, obviously. So, here's the uh here's the planet, and I'm going to draw a thin line.
>> Just Just dismiss that point. Dismissed that one. I got you.
>> What point? You didn't you didn't have a point.
>> You don't we don't even know what we're looking at.
>> So, there is there is a line, a straight line in in paint connecting one edge, one edge. Let me make it a little bit smaller so you can see all the way to the other edge.
>> If the line is straight, then why is it broken in segments?
>> Because it's tilted. We can go to a more sophisticated software.
>> So it's tilted straight. It's tilted straight.
>> Tilted can be straight. Yeah, you can have a straight line that's tilted.
>> Oh, so level level cannot be level.
>> I said I said straight, not level.
>> Yeah, but level can be curved, too, right? You probably believe that too, right?
>> Well, sure. Yeah, you can have you can have something that's level that's on a curved surface. Yeah, >> there you go, ladies and gentlemen.
Because he has to use it to explain the oceans that are always why why is the horizon here? Why is that higher than the straight line connecting the two ends of the horizon?
>> Perspective.
>> Perspective is why the earth curves. Ah, it's perspective. the mag the magical that flat earth has always the magical the magical out that flat earth has always used that they don't understand and they just think that it gets them an escape from everything right you can just say perspective you can just say perspect perspective of what what part of the picture is making it appear curved how is it that perspective is doing that perspective isn't magic it's a very specific optical phenomenon so explain to me what part about perspective is making this appear curved Oh, feature of perspective. Bring it.
Bring it bring bring it back up because I obviously you don't understand perspective or anything about >> obviously. Obviously. Yes.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> By the way, here's the original image if you if you if you care for it.
>> This is just an overlay.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. We don't need a line the the self-imposed line to prove something, you know.
>> Well, I mean, it does it does prove that it's curved, right?
>> You like the line the line is curved and uh it's not back in the question. I don't think you know what that means.
The line is curved and the line is just laid on top of the image. So, it's a logical fallacy.
>> Obviously, it's curved. I don't think you know what that word means. I guess it's a phrase, but you know, >> no, it I do. And I just think that the earth is measured flat. All miles are flat. Kilm are flat. Inches.
>> What the measured flat?
>> Sorry, what? Miles are flat. What does that mean?
>> Yes, miles. All measurement, all measurements to prove.
>> What does it mean for a What does it mean for a mile to be flat?
>> Measurements are flat. All measurements.
>> What does it mean for a mile to be flat?
>> What does that mean? is flat. It's a flat It's a flat measurement.
>> What does that mean?
>> It means that it's a flat measurement.
>> Wait a minute. So, do you think that we can measure the circumference? Oh, you can't say that. Do you think that we can measure the circumference of a circle in miles?
>> Absolutely.
>> Okay. Is the circumference of a circle flat >> or is it curved?
>> Perspective wise, it's perspective wise.
It's it's actually that's begging the question right there. That's begging the question.
>> What's begging the question? Can you explain to me a question?
>> You just asked me about >> I can explain to you what you just did.
You just asked me. You presupposed a measurement that you don't know and you don't know because I'm telling you that it's irrelevant. Earth is measured flat.
Miles are flat. Measurements are flat.
All measurements are derived from Polaris from elevation.
>> Is this a troll? Do you guys think that this is a troll? Because it might just be like a really talented troll.
>> No. Every measurement is uh derived from Polaris on angle measurement parallel to the sea level.
Yeah. So, can you measure in miles or centimeters or inches or whatever? Can you measure the circumference of a circle?
>> You can measure them flat. You can me whatever you're measuring, you're measuring flat.
>> Can you measure the circumference of a circle?
>> I don't know. I don't I'm not a circumference.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Can you measure it? If there was like a circle, could you measure the circumference of the circle?
>> Sure.
>> Okay. Is a circle flat or is it curved?
Uh, depends what kind of circle.
>> Does it Does it depend on the kind of circle?
>> Yeah, because you're trying to say that all circles are spheres and all spheres are circles.
>> That's not what I'm saying.
>> It doesn't matter because at the end of the day, it's measured flat. The Earth is measured flat.
>> I know that that's what you say, but I'm not sure you even know what a measurement is. If you think that miles are flat, >> all measurements are taken to Polaris through the ray of the elevation angle parallel to the sea level.
>> Do you know how the meter is defined >> on a flat earth?
>> Do you know how the meter is defined?
>> At least up until recently, do you know how the meter was defined?
>> Do you know? Do you know >> he's going to dodge? He's going to dodge.
>> Do you know the image of a ferroell magnet? Have you ever heard of that? In the image of a ferosol magnet. Oh, Rob is Rob is a glober and likes to stir up doodoo to provide engagement. I used to frequent a Discord server he's in.
>> Oh, >> no, he didn't. This guy's a liar. He doesn't know me. I never met him.
>> Mods.
>> [ __ ] you, Dr. Peek. [ __ ] you, Dr. Peek.
>> Mods benom.
>> Appreciate that, Pat.
Thank you for the $5 and for letting me know that Rob is a troll.
Phantom.
Yeah, he like he did sound like a troll.
Um, right. Like All right. Oh, there was somebody in the guest chat. Um, he is a legit fler, too. Wait.
Okay, now I'm not so sure. But anyway, oh, Gladiator's back.
Gladiator, you back. You're back for a third spanking.
>> Hello. Hello.
>> A third spanking. I I see. Right.
>> A third.
third already.
>> Yeah, this is the this is the this would be the third spanking.
>> Well, no. I just I joined the live and I I saw you were showing that guy like a high altitude curvature.
>> Uh-huh.
>> But >> did we already talk about that one or did you want to get spanked on that?
Like it's up to you.
>> No, I mean that that's the reason I I requested up is because I mean you didn't mention >> there's clearly going to be like, you know, barrel distortion on those cameras, right?
>> Oh, if there were and we can talk about this again. I don't know what what's so hard to understand about this, but yeah, one sec.
If there were barrel distortion, then it would be the case that these taught strings, see how there's strings here, those those two lines, those taut strings would also be distorted. That's what the strings are there to show that there isn't barrel distortion.
>> No, but you see, if you showed a video of that, right? Like I I can guarantee you that the entire video that you see >> You mean the video that we can look at?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> So again, pay attention to these strings. The strings are a measure of how much distortion there is, right? If the strings are distorted, then the if the like if the strings bend up, then that means that images that are bending up should be curved upwards from barrel distortion. If the string bends down, that means that the thing should bend down due to barrel distortion. But look, they're not bent.
>> Or they can bend on the side very slightly like using a >> but we were talking about we were talking about a thing that looks like this.
>> And so that's not going to be caused by side barrel distortion. That will be caused by up down barrel distortion.
>> So you notice here in this video, right, you can literally see >> let's go up to see the earth. Come back there.
>> Well, no. I'm I'm just I'm just I'm just scooting to a higher altitude.
>> Or maybe it'll show it again. Is it? Oh, poise it. Pause it there.
>> Hold on. I'm just going to a higher altitude.
>> Perfect. Cuz that showed a concave Earth, >> right?
>> Did it where?
>> Yeah, because the Earth was looking concave. And obviously the Earth isn't concave. I mean, I know some people think it is, but I don't.
>> Where?
>> Oh, well, you had it. It was like in the corner. It showed the Earth.
>> Oh, you mean like up there?
>> Yeah. No, no, no. Right there. Look at that. Look at that. So, in the right bottom right hand corner. Look at that.
>> That's not concave.
>> That's clearly concave. It's not clearly not. It's actually It's actually positively curved. It's >> it's very hard to see because it's like blending in with like the white part of the uh YouTube tab, but it is clearly like concaved. So, that shows >> We can leave it We can leave it to chat, but >> but why don't we just go to the place where it's at its highest altitude >> and then you can just tell me. So, it's highest at like right around here.
>> Here we go. And again, pay attention to the strings, right?
>> Right. But you do understand like how strings that are much closer to you in like the foreground aren't going to be warped by the lens.
>> Yes, they will actually. They'll be warped the exact same amount which is why this is a good experiment.
>> No, they wouldn't.
>> Yeah, they would.
>> They wouldn't. Anyone can actually recreate the angular the angular deviation would be the exact same >> because a lens doesn't know how far away something is. A lens just picks up light that's entering it. And so the so all that it cares about is the angular deviation. So we can see that it's like obviously >> right. It gets more curved as you point the lens down. So there is clearly So what what kind of lens is this? He goes in that there isn't any sort of distortion. Uh >> he he goes over it uh he goes over it all in the actual video. Like he has a summary of this, but he says that there's the upfacing balloon cam. That's a GoPro Hero 3. That's this one. Then he has the rearfacing wide cam. That's a GoPro Hero 4. That's that one. That one's going to have a lot of barrel distortion. And then he says, "The main mage experimental narrow angle 90° cam is a Firefly 8SE 90°."
>> Yeah. I mean, you can literally >> So, the point is is that if there's barrel distortion, if there's barrel distortion, if the thing is in the bottom of the bottom part of the frame, it should be curving up, not down. But if we just go look at this example where the earth is not >> halfway up the screen >> if you go if you go look in the example then if you go look in the example the earth is in the bottom half of the frame and yet it is still curving in the opposite direction of barrel distortion that it would be curving from barrel distortion right it's curving in the opposite direction so this can't be due to barrel distortion >> yeah so as you play the video you can clearly see the earth get more convex >> do you have an answer to I just said >> if this was due to barrel distortion >> then then it should be curving in the other direction.
>> No, cuz you have it pointed down.
>> Barrel distortion curves things in the bottom half of the frame up and things in the top half of the frame down. Here we have something curving down while in the bottom half of the frame.
>> If it was a barrel distortion, then it should curve up. It It doesn't actually.
You're just saying that it does. Well, you didn't want to pause on those moments. You were like, >> "How am I supposed to Well, so why don't you go and do this and actually go find >> video right here, >> right? So you like like here here's an example of it being >> way more flat. Why does it look more flat?"
>> I mean, it's definitely curved. I can pull it up and paint. We can grab a screen.
>> Compared to the the image you were showing before, there was clearly more curvature in that in that one there. So, >> it's like the same amount. You just have to go from white to white.
>> Clearly isn't.
And as you point the barrel Yeah. as it goes down. And if it keeps going up, it's going to get flat and then it starts to go concave. It's not concave.
Anyway, so to be clear, in this photo, this is a still from that video. Why is it curved in this direction?
Do you have an explanation?
>> Uh, no. Probably not. It's not off the top of my head.
>> Because it can't be due to barrel distortion because it's on the wrong side of the camera. I mean, I'd really need to like look into the specific video. I' never seen it.
>> He has a whole docu He documents the whole thing, >> but it's just I know that all cameras do impose curvature. Like that's just they do, right? So, >> well, not necessarily. No.
>> Uh, yes.
>> Okay. Prove it.
>> Well, I am I'm going to go and actually research this cuz like I do find this stuff interesting and that's why I have doubts about this and I >> I don't know. For me personally, it's more I think I do think a lot of people who think this conversation is stupid, they don't they don't even know anything about where they live. Like >> I mean the thing is is if you were being like intellectually honest, you wouldn't immediately try to say, "Oh, it's barrel distortion. Oh, it's barrel distortion."
Instead of actually like looking into it >> because it's obvious it's demonstrabably not barrel distortion because you're seeing the curve on the bottom half of the frame.
>> It can't be from my point of view. Every time I have seen a video and I go and research it, there is clearly barrel distortion when I play the video myself.
>> That's great.
>> Okay, you might be right on this one.
I'll go and check it.
>> Okay. Okay.
Yeah, but uh again, it's just this this one video is just it's it's not going to be enough. There's too much like there's too many other issues with the whole model really.
>> Yeah. So, what about um what did we talk about last time? Do you remember?
>> Oh, my bad. I mute myself. Uh, no I don't.
>> Did we Did we happen to talk about uh the Fukult pendulum?
>> Yeah, actually I think we might have touched on that.
>> That's interesting.
>> Yeah. So, did you look into it anymore?
>> Uh, yeah. We were talking about like eliminating the electrostatics in it, right?
>> No, that's that's the Cavendish one. Oh, that's the Cavendish, right? That's the >> Yeah. So, are you are you familiar with the Focal Pendulum? I >> They're very similar, right?
>> No, not at all.
Well, they are. They're just balls on string, right?
>> I mean, I guess, >> but in Cavendish, you got two of them.
>> Well, there's you only two proofs for dur motion.
>> No, you can also you can also use a kulom gen or a Compton generator. You can use a gyroscope. You can use well, you probably don't want to you probably don't want to use stuff that looks at the sky. Anything that has a corololis that you can measure the corololis effect for all shows the motion of the earth. out. Um but if >> No, this is this is the issue. This is >> talk about the football pendulum. We can >> No, I don't.
>> Oh, you want to talk about the football pendulum? Okay.
>> This is what I researched.
>> Yeah, sure.
>> And specifically research the football pendulum. Sure. Yeah. Go ahead. Tell me.
>> We said that the corololis effect actually affects uh sorry is uh you know proof of the earth's rotation, right? Or the earth's motion.
>> It's proof of it's proof of non-inertial behavior for the surface of the earth.
Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> Right. Yes. So I also researched that would be perfectly explainable where if the sky just moved around us through a stationary transfer of energy will there be a transfer of energy down towards us.
>> How what's what's transferring the energy?
>> They do create like a vortex.
>> Well if there was a motion >> what is the medium that is transferring >> max principle or max principle?
>> Mark's principle is not an explanation.
That's just the name of a principle.
>> Yeah. Yeah, it's it's the idea that literally if the sky if what we observed by the way we all observe the earth to be stationary in the sky to move around us on a firsthand basis right so if that was true there would be a transfer of energy from the sky down >> oh no that's not what Mox's principle is you're referring you're referring to the lens throwing effect which is an explanation for Mark's principle which by the way assumes general relativity is true and if you assume general relativity is true then the earth is a sphere >> uh yeah I don't I don't I don't assume general relativity So then you can't rely on Mox principle.
>> That [ __ ] just does not work.
>> Then you can't then you can't rely on Mox principle.
>> Well, it's just an idea. It's just a framework.
>> But the basic idea makes sense.
>> So you need No, it doesn't. You need to propose some sort of mechanism that explains why things in motion would feel this extra apparent force called the corololis force, but things not in motion would not feel it.
>> Okay. So an example is imagine you have like you >> I don't want an example. I want an explanation. Yeah, this is an explanation. You have a bathtub full of water. If you wave your hand above the water, you can affect the motion of the water through a transfer of med.
>> If there's a certain medium between us in the sky, right?
>> Mhm.
>> Which we can't verify. You think it's a vacuum, even though you can't verify that. That's cool.
>> Sure you can.
>> No, you can't at all.
>> Sure you can. I mean, it's it's not.
It's pretty easy to verify. You can send stuff there. Um, but that's neither here nor there. So I agree that wind can make things like if you you know if you flick your hand o above some water the water will ripple or whatever right >> the problem >> but you're not actually touching the water >> the problem with that explanation is that that would affect things that are both moving and things that are stationary but the corololis effect only affects things that are moving. That's the thing that you need the explanation for.
But to what? How much does it affect him? Like does a sniper have to really account for it?
>> I'm not a sniper. I don't know.
>> I imagine that snipers pro I imagine snipers probably air balloon.
>> I imagine that snipers probably don't.
Um I know that I know for a fact from speaking to people who have actually been artillery calcul.
The people who calculate trajectories for artillery, they definitely do.
>> Um they definitely do account for the coral effect. But again, we established the corros effect can be created.
>> Not not until you can account for the fact not not until you can account for the fact that the doesn't affect anything that's just sitting still on the ground.
>> Well, why would it?
>> Well, if you just >> if your model doesn't sat still on the ground, >> if the Yeah, that's that's the prediction.
>> I'm talking about the same corololis effect.
>> If the water is still and you move your hand over it, the water will move even if it started out stationary. Right.
>> Right. So imagine the water.
>> So your explanation your explanation can't account for why things aren't affected by the corololis effect when they're stationary.
>> It's the same reason that they're not.
We we're explaining the same corololis effect. We're just saying >> we're not. You don't have a mechanism. I have a mechanism.
>> I do. The mechanism is the sky rotating around.
>> How would the sky rotating make something move? Make would a How would the sky rotating around something make something for a second please?
>> Gladiator. One sec.
Your claim is that the sky is moving in a way and it like pushes on stuff, right?
>> It doesn't have to physically push on stuff.
>> It pushes on stuff in the same way that wind that that wind or electrostatics or whatever pushes on stuff. Right.
>> Right.
>> If that if there is some force that is being caused from the motion of the sky above us, you need to explain why that force only works on things that are moving along the ground.
It doesn't work on things that are sitting still on the ground.
>> Yeah, but why would it?
>> Because the force doesn't know what things are moving and what things are not.
It's coming from the sky. The sky doesn't know what's going on on the ground. It's just applying a force. It should, if your model is correct, it should affect everything, right?
>> It has a very little effect. It's like >> it has zero effect on stationary things and it has a measurable effect on non-stationary things. So why is it zero when the thing is stationary?
>> I don't I don't know what's so hard to grasp about this. It's just >> you need you need to provide a mechanism. It's not enough to just say well why would it? No, you have to explain why it distinguishes between moving things and non-moving things.
The same reason the corololis effect doesn't >> the reason the reason why the corololis effect doesn't distinguish is because the earth is in a non-inertial reference frame and from the law of inertia a thing would not and you can work out the explicit mathematics here there is no actual force being applied from the you know from the earth moving it's just a result of the things moving in a nonstraight line path on the surface of the earth because the surface of the earth is curved But you don't have that. So you can't appeal to the same explanation.
>> So if the whole universe was rotating around us, it wouldn't create some sort of force.
>> It would if general relativity is true.
If general relativity is not true, then you have no mechanism to explain why that would happen.
>> Why is that?
Because the only reason it happens in general relativity is because spacetime itself gets twisted and the trajectory of an object through well that's the general relativistic explanation that's how you're getting by you need some other well okay so then you need to demonstrate that because >> we understand we understand how magnetism works magnetism is really >> I can demonstrate it >> so show me how show me how magnetism is the thing that's responsible for coral effect what by the One way you could do this, one way you could do this is you could try doing a corololis experiment for two different things. One of which is iron which is very magnetic and one of which is say plastic which is not magnetic. Do launch them along the same trajectory and measure the corololis force and see are they affected in the same way because if they're affected in the same way then it can't be magnetism.
>> All right.
>> Also, by the way, just as a check here, um if it were magnetism, then the corololis effect wouldn't affect clouds, which is what hurricanes are made out of. No, no. I'm talking about what's making the sky rotate as well.
>> Here's the thing. The coral possible explanation.
>> The Corololis effect is what causes the hurricanes to rotate the way they do.
And clouds aren't magnetic.
>> Well, no, but if look, if the sky is rotating above us, there would be like a vortex created above us.
>> Okay. What's the mechanism by which it acts? How does it work?
>> How does the universe work is what you're asking. I'm asking you to provide me a mechanism, not just a fact.
>> What I enjoy in this conversation is pointing out how like ridiculous >> I'm asking I'm asking for more.
>> Wait, my side is ridiculous. When you're >> explain how the universe works like >> I'm asking you to give me a mechanism rather than just a vibe.
>> I can theorize it.
>> Wait. Okay. So, do you have any experimental evidence that provide that?
>> You say what's making what's making the sky move around us? What's making the galaxies move? You say it's the bending and warping of spaceime which is measurable.
>> Prove that to me.
>> Yeah, it's measurable.
>> I could prove magnetism to you as a as a >> So to be clear, the corololis effect, >> it makes more sense.
>> To be clear, the corololis effect is easily seen in a smaller setting. Uh you can see it just like in a like you don't even it doesn't even have to be the corals effect of the earth. You can see the corals effect on anything that's rotating. And we demonstrate this in uh like in classrooms all the time. I can show you a video really quick.
Um, >> okay.
>> Hold on. It actually does make more sense.
>> Hold up. Hold up. I'm going to show you the coralus effect. I just want to find the right video. Um, this one's decent.
It's not >> demonstration of the bending and warping of spaceime.
>> It's just It's just non-inertial motion.
>> So, you don't have that?
>> I'm That's I'm not claiming to show you a demonstration of the bending warping of spaceime. I'm claiming to show you the show effect, dumb ass.
>> Like, what we're talking about as a whole is the skies. You just want to deflect to something that you know that you just want to deflect something that's harder to demonstrate. It's >> so relevant. I'm saying it's really not it's not it's not re it's not relevant for the >> I can explain my point for 10 seconds.
>> No, you may not. I'm going to show you a video really quick. So here we're here we have just four friends. They're just four lovely friends. They're sitting on a they're sitting on something that's that it's like a ferris wheel or whatever it's called. Um and so uh and it spins, right? And so they're going to toss a ball. So here we have uh this person's going to try to throw a ball at their friend right across the way.
That's the direct. So, they're just going to push it towards their friend.
Right.
>> Right.
>> Uh, and so now it's just asking us a question. Blah blah blah blah blah.
Okay. So, now here here's here it is from our perspective on the ground.
She's going to toss it to her friend.
Why did it go to the person on the person to her right?
How did that work? What was going on there? Why didn't it go across? Now, let's watch it from her perspective, you know, from above.
Watch. So, she's throwing it straight.
Oh, why does it curve?
What's going on there?
>> Okay.
>> Why is it curving away? What? Well, that's crazy.
>> Because Because the ground they're on is moving.
>> Yeah.
>> You mean the the spinning thing is moving?
>> Yeah. Yeah. The spinning.
>> Yeah. So, that's the corololis effect.
>> Okay. That's I'm not I'm not saying this. This This is the issue. You're I'm not even saying that can't be an explanation.
>> By the way, >> I'm simply providing my explanation for it.
Notably, notice the ball when when the ball is not moving, like when it's just in her hand, it's not being deflected.
>> It's only once it's moving is it deflected.
>> Right? So, >> see how when when he caught it, it's not being deflected anymore. It's just from his perspective, it's just sitting there stationary. There's no extra force on it. It's only when it's moving that it's deflected.
>> So, that's the phenomenon that we see.
We That's the phenomenon we see in the real world from the Corololis effect.
They're rotating. They're rotating really fast.
>> Um, >> also, by the way, somebody mentioned also this ball isn't magnetic, right?
So, it can't be magnetism that's doing that. So, the point is is that we have something stationary with respect to the inert the non-inertial reference frame. There's no force. When a thing is moving with respect to a non-inertial reference frame, there is an apparent force. We call that the corololis effect. That's what's happening in this video. And that's exactly what we measure in like the exact same mathematics describes this video as describes what we measure in the real world when we measure the corololis effect for like long range artillery for example. So why is it that the same thing >> why is it that the same thing the same thing so here it was spinning that caused this motion? Why is it that the same mathematics describes the spinning motion here and describes what we see on the earth?
>> Okay, but do we ever see stuff act like that on the earth? the way the ball >> no the Corololis effect is a lot more dramatic here because it's spinning a lot faster.
>> Well, we're spinning like 1,000 miles hour.
>> The Corololis effect only cares about angular velocity, not tangential velocity. Like, you know, no physicists really care about tangential velocity.
Angular velocity is the angular velocity of the Earth is very slow. It's >> 15°. Here it was rotating. I don't know.
I can estimate it. It looks like I don't know like 300° per second maybe, maybe 200° per second. orders of magnitude faster. So that's why the corals effect is more dramatic here. But it's the same mathematics that describes it.
>> Okay.
>> So why does the same mathematics describe this obvious rotating example >> and the earth?
>> Okay. And there's examples that are described of how the earth rotating would create the same effect.
>> Sorry, the sky rotating.
>> Okay. What's the example? What's the math behind it that makes it work?
>> I don't know the math. I'm not.
>> So then why do you think it's true?
>> Because in physics is physics is an empirical science.
>> We make predictions. We use mathematics and we make measurements.
>> So they don't believe it.
>> Those people aren't the people that should be calling in to defend to >> actually probably know more about the globe than they do.
>> Those people shouldn't be calling in to defend the globe. And if you don't know the math, you shouldn't be calling in to defend the flat earth.
>> Okay. So by that logic, do you know what is causing the sky to rotate around us?
Yes. The Earth's rotation.
>> But the all the galaxies are moving around us.
>> Yeah. The Earth's rotation. The Earth is rotating. Those things are doing whatever they're doing, and we're rotating. So, from our perspective, it looks like they're moving.
>> Mhm.
>> What's moving it all?
>> What's moving the Earth?
>> No. No. The The whole universe. What's moving?
>> The Earth isn't the the whole Earth isn't moving. The Earth is rotating.
>> Well, we're moving through the universe, aren't we? Static in the universe. Okay.
So, the whole universe is moving.
>> No.
>> Expanding, right?
>> Well, that's true. It is expanding.
Yeah.
>> Okay. So, what's causing that?
>> Um, what's causing that is something called an eperotic field.
>> What's that?
>> It's a kind of scalar It's a kind of scalar quantum field and it has a certain potential energy function.
>> That's very vague. Can you guess?
>> Yeah.
>> Can you provide a demonstration like what is that?
>> What you want me to go provide a demonstration of a field in my office?
It's a >> it's called anotic field that has a certain kind of potential energy function that is exponential during the descent phase.
>> What what else do you want? This is a very well- definfined explicit thing.
>> Also, you can just say you can >> you ask me a question. I gave you an answer.
>> Explain something.
>> But but if I said that about magnetism, you're like you have to demonstrate.
>> I can give you I can give you all the mathematics. Tell me a story.
>> I can give you all the mathematics for it if you want. I can show you how the data >> math describes [ __ ] >> I can show I can show you how it Well, no. The eperotic field explains it. The mathematics correctly describes it and it matches the data.
>> No, but you can't verify that explanation at all. That's just like what is that? You need to explain.
>> I'm sorry that it's in your head.
>> It's not there's nothing there's nothing vague about it. It's a particular particular explain it to a layman.
>> I I wouldn't explain it to a layman because it's not super relevant to their life and feel the whole expanding. We're talking about the nature of our reality.
So, let's not play that game.
The fact that the universe the fact that the universe is expanding is completely unrelated >> to most people's lives.
>> No, I'm trying to prove a point that >> also by the way just to be clear.
>> Even if there was no epotic field, the universe could still be expanding from inertia. This is what people thought before 1997.
>> But what is causing the universe to expand?
>> Inert I mean if if this was before 1997, I would just say inertia.
>> Inertia.
>> Yeah, that's what I would say before 1997. We know better now.
>> So, inertia just created the universe to expand. It just made the >> No, the reason why it was still expanding, at least according to people before 1997, is that it was rapidly expanding a long time ago. And what the expansion that we're seeing now is inertia, meaning that it's just carrying on expanding.
>> The force that created that to happen.
>> Oh. So, to be clear, you're asking me questions like, what caused the big bang? And I'm just asking you to explain why the corololis effect works. This is not the same.
>> Yeah. Because you can't explain that. I can give you explanations, but these are not the same class. These are not the same class of explanations. I don't claim to know what caused the big bang.
>> Then why are you moving? It was a ridiculous question in the first place.
>> Why is it that you said that it creates a vortex and that's what causes the corololis effect?
>> Cuz that's a viable possible explanation. I didn't say fact.
>> It's not viable.
>> It is. I gave a demonstration. The only way that it's viable, >> wave your hand above water without touching the water.
>> The only way that you can show it's viable is to show that the mathematical model that corresponds to that explanation matches the data. You haven't done that. It's not viable. It's a shower thought.
>> Yeah. It's like the big bang is a shower thought.
>> The Big Bang has more data than your flat earth ever will >> universe.
It's all just like unfounded theories. I mean, you're cool to believe it. It's funny that you say it's all unfounded theories when you say that there is a magical magnetic vortex that somehow causes things to move your hand above the water.
>> What's dark energy?
>> Dark energy is the acterotic field.
>> Okay. So, but what is it?
>> It's it's a scalar field. It's a scalar quantum field.
>> That's the kind of thing that it is.
>> You do understand you're not explaining.
>> I'm telling you exactly what it is. You just don't have the background knowledge to understand that that is an explanation of the kind of thing that it is. understands what it is. They wouldn't be able to describe what it actually is.
>> That's that's fair. You're not explaining anything. You're not being maybe that's true that people wouldn't understand it. That doesn't mean it's not an explanation. I've already given you a complete a complete field.
>> It's I just told you it's it's an epoch field.
>> You know what? Person I personally know.
Yeah. It's an epic field.
>> Whoa, that's crazy. So, when are you going to get like your Nobel Peace Prize?
Nobel Peace Prizes aren't awarded in physics, >> are they not? That's kind of lame.
>> Wait, is that true?
>> Yeah, it is true, dumbass. It's not a Nobel Peace Prize. That's a word for peace, not physics.
>> Yeah, but you know, >> that get out of here, Gladiator.
By the way, just as an aside, no, of course, of course we don't know for certain that the dark energy field is an eprodic field. But uh the fact is is we know that it's an eprodic field more than he knows that the magical vortex is the cause of the corololis effect. Uh the eprotic field is something that's been talked about by Neil Turo, Paul Steinhard, and it does a pretty good job accounting for the phenomena that we have. Um but no, no, of of course this is not definitive.
I was doing a little bit of trolling, if you will. Anyway, uh let me record that.
Uh and it it's just worth pointing out um it's worth pointing out that like he doesn't have an explanation for the corololis effect, right? Like of course he doesn't. He said that there's a vortex and then gave us nothing more than that. Um you can't just say a vortex to explain something. It doesn't work that way.
Somebody says, "Many physicists have been awarded the Nobel Prize." Yes, the Nobel Prize, not the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded for peace. The Nobel Prize in physics is awarded for physics.
Um, yeah, maybe if I end the flat earth debate, though. Yeah, maybe. Um, maybe I'll get a peace prize. Uh, from Brian Peek with the $5. Rob asked for an unban. He would be great for MAGA verse science. No, he doesn't get unbanned.
Sorry.
You come up, you troll, you get banned.
Them's the rules.
Uh, from Pensive with the $20. Keep up the good work, doctor. I appreciate that. I will do my best. From doubting Thomas with the $10, do you think NASA sometimes limits the rocket sometimes limit the rocket's view of launch as it passes the atmosphere space boundary because of sensitive land satellite accidentally passing the rocket POV giving hostile recon? No. No. The thing is is when you're in the atmosphere, but also going like Mach 25, there's just a lot of uh like plasma interference and stuff. So, No.
Uh, from House7 with the $2. I don't get it. So, it must be false argument. Yep.
That's what just happened. That's what we just engaged with. Um, from Dudipity with the $50. Very much appreciated, dud dudipity. It's people like you who help keep this channel running. Thank you so much. It's very much appreciated. Um, as a fellow masochist scientist who debates flares, I would love your input on a falsifiability criterion we could accept. flour react if and um if I say I'll go to NASA AFL AFRL tomorrow and expose the cabal just demonstrate X what can be our what can our consensus be well I mean there's not going to be a consensus but you know you could say something like if you could I don't know what would be a good example um yeah we could do the uh we could do the nutrino thing if you can detect nutrinos if if you shoot a nutrino beam level right? Like uh you know at 0 degrees relative to the tangent of the surface of the earth at another target that's the same altitude above the earth you shoot a nutrino beam level and detect it say 500 miles away whatever it is some some large number of miles away that would be great false viability condition if they could do that great and from less with the five euros His magnet tornado theory makes me worried.
I've had magnet brain stimulation. Damn, you're getting a refund. Um, yeah. I mean, like, it's just like a vibe. It's a shower thought. It's not an actual proposal, right? You could test these. You could test this proposal, but first he would have to provide a model that we could test against something falsifiable, something that makes predictions, like numerical predictions rather than just vibes. And he won't.
Uh, Duda Dippity has joined up again. I think Duda Dippity wants to apologize.
Duda, how's it going?
>> Yes, I'm I've been a fan for so long. It actually hurt my feelings when I got kicked. I was like, this is like qualls.
What the hell?
>> You don't troll. Them's the rules.
>> Sorry, I didn't know. I didn't read.
>> Okay.
>> Uh, you're good. Go ahead.
>> Uh, my question was I was hoping for something more approachable because I brought up that, you know, I've shot uh lasers at the Luna Retro Reflector and it's >> it's not approachable. Uh which by the way I think what you're doing uh you know it's science outreach and it's like the most important thing. This is the whole point.
>> Uh but it's I'm racking my brain trying to find something that is just dead simple that they don't already have like a canned stupid response to.
>> Ask them to zoom back in the sun at midnight. Ask them to zoom back in the sun.
>> Okay. Uh what do you and by the way when I say consensus I can say look the other famous P doctor or PhD debater we this is scientific consensus okay the I was wondering what about uh uh taking a picture of the moon from two different hemispheres there some of them are Australia some of them aren't >> what would that >> oh I guess they're small they have they have it I thought they're expect >> or alternatively zoom back in the north star from the southern hemisphere >> okay either one that's easiest That's the easiest one.
>> Well, not a lot of people live in the southern hemisphere. Zooming back in the sun could in principle be done by everybody. You just have to go out at midnight with a telescope. And if it is true or like, you know, telescopic a telephoto lens or something on your Nikon P1000. If it's true, then they should be able to zoom in on the sun.
>> What?
>> Uh why are they all Nikon P1000s?
>> I don't know. Who knows?
>> Okay. No, I think the Northstar one's easy because there's there's always an Australian crazy Australian person and there's a person in North America. It's a perfect it's a perfect >> to find North Star. Yeah, of course.
Don't troll.
>> You're good. No, no, you're good. Take care.
>> All right. Uh, let me drink some water and then we'll read some super chats and we'll call it a day.
He sent $50 and he seems cool so he doesn't get banned. That was the rules.
I don't make them. I just enforce them.
Uh, actually I do make them and I enforce them. Uh, actually I don't enforce them. That's what the mods do. I lied to you the entirety of that sentence. Actually, turns out um from someone someone sent a $5 gift on buy me a coffee, which is much appreciated. No message, but I do appreciate it regardless.
And Grimlock sent another $10 for what's on your teeth is generally Siva. Shut up, Grimlock. I mean, it's true, but that doesn't it doesn't help me here.
I appreciate that. I appreciate it though regardless. All right, y'all. Um we are going to end the live here. Uh, let's see if anybody is live right now that we can send you guys over to, um, the only person I follow who's live, I follow Parker and I follow the Bible Guy. And the Bible Guy, he's a good dude. Parker's a good dude, too, but he doesn't need my raid. So, let's all go over to the Bible Guys channel where Scientific Snitch is as well, and just call um just when you want when you go in, just say Blitz Raid. Just do Blitz Raid over and over and over again until uh you get muted or something.
In the meantime, I will see you guys tomorrow. Uh, actually, will I Hold on.
Let me check my calendar.
Today's Monday.
Um, okay. I will see you guys tomorrow for Ask a Physicist. And, uh, take care everybody.
Videos Relacionados
Is dark matter real? - Why can't we find it? - physicist explains | Don Lincoln and Lex Fridman
LexClips
1K views•2026-05-30
Saptarshi Basu - Spectacular Voyage of Droplets: A Multiscale Journey to Extreme Flow Conditions
DAlembert-SU-CNRS
152 views•2026-06-02
A 6.0 Just Hit Hawaii — And It Came From The Wrong Place
TerraWatchHQ
115 views•2026-06-03
The Split-Second Mistake That Made Bouncing Bettys So Deadly
NoMansLandChannel
253 views•2026-06-02
Nobody Expected This Lava Reaction 🤯 #faits #facts
TendzDora
28K views•2026-05-30
The Silent Memory of Glass
UnchartedScienceworld
146 views•2026-05-30
The Difference In Charged And Neutral Particles
heavybrainspace
959 views•2026-05-29
A380 vs Every Vehicles Crash Test Challenge | Which One Win?
BeamLap
163 views•2026-05-29
