This investigation highlights how AI is turning public discourse into a hall of mirrors where authenticity is the first casualty. It signals a future where political narratives are built on manufactured echoes rather than verifiable reality.
Inmersión profunda
Prerrequisito
- No hay datos disponibles.
Próximos pasos
- No hay datos disponibles.
Inmersión profunda
Candace Owens Was RIGHT — Researcher Finds MAJOR Charlie Kirk Audio ProblemsAñadido:
There it is.
As you guys can see, we are here. We are here once again in the morning. Now, this might just be proof. One person may have found the Charlie Kirk interview that maybe, perhaps, allegedly, maybe my opinion, whatever we got to say, this might be the interview that was used in order to make the Afest I appoint Erica Kirk video or, you know, alleged video audio for sure. This might have been the interview used to do it.
And this interview is of course just called Charlie Kirk's final interview.
Okay. So, it's this interview here.
We're going to listen to that. But first, we're going to listen to this lady. First, we're going to listen to Candace Owens talk a little bit about it. Just in case you forget how avidly Candace Owens has wanted to have this video. So, she even video, alleged video, audio, whatever it is. Turning Points being very weird about it, of course. And um let's jump right in.
Let's jump right in and I'm going to show you this girl afterwards. This girl right here, because she may have just cracked this case. She may have just cracked this case. Maybe. Maybe. But listen to this first just to get you caught up on the whole thing. Kirk ever said and using the ghost of Charlie Kirk to say, "Well, if he was here, he would say this, even though it goes against everything he ever said, hence our countdown." Blakey Blakey, we are at 50.
I didn't think we'd see 50 days, and here we are at 54 days. 54 long days and long nights of uh no response to the AI, alleged AI video of Charlie Kirk appointing Erica as CEO. But we just are asking him to drop the video. It's not that hard. I don't know why they're reaching out to Daily Mail reporters and saying they can have a screening. Like it's like the October 7th video. You can have a screening. We can bring it to you. Uh we can show you on FaceTime, but you can never tell anybody. It's pretty simple. You guys are the ones that played it. She's never going to take those numbers down. You realize this, right? You realize that that that goes up to 999.
Okay? You You guys understand that, right? So, she's just going to have that there for that long. I'm telling you, if she doesn't run for pre if she doesn't run for president, she's just going to have that up until it hits 999. That's what's going to happen. Candace digs her feet into things. I don't think she's just going to get rid of it. Maybe she will. Maybe it'll get to like 180 days and she'll be like, "Well, I guess I can just get rid of this." You know, Blake's a liar. He's zesty. We all know. And, you know, maybe that'll be it. Maybe.
But she has the option to keep it until 999. They never thought when they made that audio video abomination or real thing. I I'm so positive it's not real.
It's not even funny. I don't even want to be charitable. I don't even want to have to say allegedly it so doesn't sound real. They did not They did not think people were going to be like, "Oh, I'm just going to run this through AI and I'm going to analyze this. I'm going to listen to Charlie Kirk videos and I'm going to find transcripts. They didn't think all that would happen. They thought Erica would just smile. She'd have leather pants on or whatever the hell she was wearing at an infest and and that'd be it. That'd be it. Usher in the new Hillary. Here's the new Hillary, everybody. That's what they thought. No, they had something they had they got something different coming now.
>> It was her walkout music as she soaked it in. Oh, it's me. Power. unlimited power at Amfest.
We're just saying you gave us the audio, give us the video. It feels so rational.
It's a rational ask. But Blakey says it's not. He says only psychopaths would want proof that Charlie went against everything he ever said. Whenever Charlie did this, he did it in private, by the way. I guess he was just a public character. He pretended to be conservative, but secretly he was a diehard feminist. die hard.
Yeah. He just he was when he got home, he was like wearing the hats, the women's march hats. He just was like, "Erica, I just if anything ever happens to me, I want you to take over. I want you to leave our kids at home um effectively orphaned and take over my whole company. And while you're at my company, please reverse course on everything that I ever said. I just I don't even want to recognize it as my company." And Erica said, "Okay, honey.
Yeah, babe. Gotcha. I'll do that, babe.
I Candace gets very passionate about this.
Even to the point where she mentioned it with Anna Kasperia when she sat down with her. It came up >> and I said that to her face. I said, "That's a tough one for me, but okay."
And then I got the information that no, Erica actually called the surgeon. It's a three-way call. And she wanted to know what to tell the public about why the bullet didn't go through. And that Superman neck thing came from her. So yeah, the public was told from Andrew's tweet. So I'm like, I can't. Somebody just defend it. Somebody just tell me why that shouldn't completely unnerve me.
>> You know, such a just a quick side just a quick sidebar, okay? Because this was a great interview. I don't know if you guys have seen it. You should. Candace Owens, Anakasperia. It was great. It was like a Joe Rogan level podcast. It was only an hour and a half, but they crammed so much into that hour and a half. It was great. Um, the fact that she just said that it was a three-way call and Erica wanted to know what to tell the public.
Why isn't that weird? Am I Am I tripping?
Your husband's gone and you're trying to figure out what you can tell the public about why the bullet didn't go all the way through.
Wouldn't the proper response be like, "I don't care. I don't care what people are asking.
I don't care if they want to know how it went through. He's He's gone. He's my husband. Like, I'm figuring out other things. She actually got on a three-way call with Andrew and said, "What do we tell the public?" That's insane.
How come I How come that didn't occur to me sooner? I've heard this story so many times. That's insane. Anyway, sorry.
Sorry. I'm not I'm not gonna get Sidebar. Sidebar. Anyway, >> donors the another huge one where like these are my two biggest things. Donors saying that that video that or or hasn't existed yet, the AI alleged AI of Charlie saying, "I appoint Erica to be the CEO." Erica told me that he said that at an Aspen event. I was like, "Okay, great."
>> Well, the Aspen people who were at the event said that never happened.
>> What?
>> These are the Turning Point USA donors who have contacted me and said, "Candice, that is AI." He did not say that. Oh, they just became best friends.
You see that reaction? That was like, girl. And then I went to the Aspen people, the ones with the There was some with small hats, the other ones that didn't have small hats. Girl, you wouldn't believe what they told me. And she's Look at her face. She's like, "What?"
Oh, they're best friends. This is the This is the the worst coming together for any for all the Zo Rangers. This is the worst two people to come together.
>> What? Now, they have alleged that they have the video of that. Why do they only play the audio? And then when I said, "Hey guys, um, this is not normal. It doesn't actually really sound like Charlie. The the cadence is somewhat off."
>> And I said, "Okay, so just drop the video so we can all put this to bed."
>> Not only that, people at Turning Point told me that he never said that at this event. Okay. So, what am I left to do? I You guys mentioned this to the public.
You said that Charlie two weeks before I guess had done a complete 180 on his entire life's perspective that women should stay home and raise the children and not be CEOs. And suddenly he was like, you know what, actually not only should women do it, but single women should do it. Widows should do it and the kids should just be raised by the nanny and they they should work 80our weeks.
>> That does seem uncharacteristic of Charlie.
>> Completely uncharacteristic of everything he's ever said. In fact, one of the last conversations I had with him was at the Democratic National Convention and um look, I always appreciated the fact that he was down to debate, right? And that he didn't ever let it get dirty like >> and so I I I appreciated that. And so we started debating about the role of women. And he basically said cuz I don't have children. I don't plan on having children. It's just a decision that me and my husband made together. And honestly, I don't think that I have the right temperament to be a mom in today's society because I will definitely kill people if they come anywhere like what they're doing to my husband right now.
If they tried to like harm my kids >> prison, >> I Yeah, I would 100% I don't give a damn. That's how I am. I'm like >> I mean, you know, that's that's a very odd stance. I would be so Listen, I would be so protective of my kids that I'm just not going to have any. That's a very weird stance to take there.
Obviously, there's more to it than that.
Uh but to you, I would just be so protected. I me not having kids is actually protecting the rest of you. I really want them. I would love to have them. I'd love to have them running around and all sorts of stuff, the projectiles and whatnot.
But if anyone got too close, I mean, hands behind my back and you know, now your mom's crying, you're on t-shirts, there's flowers everywhere.
Okay, that's just a very weird st I' I've never heard anybody take that stance before on not having kids.
>> Like fiercely loyal and defensive of my family. Um but anyway, um he told me, well, you know, if you don't have kids, you don't really have a stake in the future of this country. And I just remember being very offended by that because I love this country so much and I definitely do have a stake in the future. Like I have young, you know, nieces and nephews that I love to death, but even if I didn't, I love the people of this country. Like I want it to succeed. And so, and so in that conversation, he like really reiterated what he believes the role of women should be. So then after he gets assassinated and you don't really question it at first because you don't want to be that guy or that person who's just like I don't know that sounds a little shady and weird >> and you go along to get along. That's a good example of a story where you go along to get along. But yeah, there was this feeling within me where it's like, well, maybe he was willing to go against his beliefs or his values because he wants to make sure that the business falls in the hands of a family member, right? Maybe that's why. But I just I do find it strange. I do. Like it goes against common sense because not only the story we're being told is like specifically he said if anything ever happens to me meaning like if I get killed I want my wife to be the next person that gets into the line of fire while my kids are at home. Like what?
Like no that's a good point.
>> Actually your instinct is then no shut this down. You go and move and stay away from politics forever and protect our children. So it defies common sense. And I know what Charlie's perspectives were obviously the life that he wanted and what he said every time anybody asked him on his podcast. I mean, we have a decade of Charlie saying what he what his perspective perspective was on how women should stay home and there's no value in becoming a CEO and then suddenly it's whiplash and we're told actually right before he died he just had this amazing 180 that nobody it was a you know private donor event and now the donors are saying it didn't happen and that that is AI. Okay, that's a very big claim that I am making, right? And I'm not making that claim. By the way, the donors are contacting me and saying this never happened because they couldn't believe it because they said they were watching my podcast and when they had heard it initially when Erica told the story to Megan Kelly, they thought, "Oh, it must have been at the Hamptons or whatever it was." And then when I said it was Aspen, they were shocked. This absolutely does not happen. So, if I'm lying about that, wouldn't you, if you're Andrew Kulvette, instantly say, "Oh, here's the video, Candace." Like, I don't know, maybe the donor forgot, but here it is. And now we're suddenly going, "Why didn't they drop the video?"
>> Yeah.
>> Like, they had her walk out to the audio. That would have been a very powerful Could you imagine? You have a video of Charlie on stage at an event and he says like, "I want Erica Kirk. I appoint Erica Kirk to be the CEO."
>> Like, people would have had not had a dry eye in the place. We would have I think it would have like even more made people rally. Who would have said that language? Even if you were going to put your wife in that position, who would say I appoint and then you say her full name? Why would you? What? I haven't said my wife's name in years.
Like what? I haven't said her name in years. I haven't heard her say my name.
Not really. Unless she's talking to the boy. The boy has my name. But other than that, it's like I don't know.
It's just such weird language. to say someone's full name as you know and they're not in trouble. I appoint and then you say Erica Kirk to be CEO Turning Point. That's a weird thing to say. Very weird thing to say.
>> Lay around and said like okay I don't love it but like it is it was like Charlie's dying wish. Yeah.
>> And instead Blake Nef says we're never dropping the video. That's so weird.
>> It's it's bonkers. And so I have there are are real things that are compelling me to continue this pursuit. I'm not interested in the vanity of like, you know, her outfits or her makeup. And >> you're under tremendous fire right now.
I mean, it's I can't even imagine like people in the media are really going at it like just trying to, you know, attack you for being cruel and and you know, going after Erica and like I do think that they put words in your mouth sometimes and say things that you didn't actually say. But you know the other thing that I mean look you tend to provide receipts when you have them, right? And so everyone was denying what you were saying about the very real pressure campaign that Charlie >> Yeah, the pressure campaign. We'll get into that a little more on the channel, but I want to move on to the actual research. Check this out. This lady did some research and check out what she found.
>> I can prove this Charlie Kirk audio is fake and that the truth is even more disturbing than we thought.
>> A lot of organizations and groups as soon as a founder leaves it just kind of collapses. A lot of my job is not always in the dayto-day details. It's very much vision casting, very much driving success.
But we have a great board and god forbid if something happens, they'll figure it out. I appoint my wife to runoint USA.
If something happens to me, Erica would do a great job. A few weeks ago, while researching Charlie's final interview, I made notes about him discussing brands collapsing when founders leave. I didn't think much of it at the time, but when I heard this supposed donor event audio again today, I recognized the voice patterns. I went back to check and while nothing matches exactly, there are many of the same words and phrases. Founders >> Founders are rarely >> dayto-day >> good day-to-day managers >> collapse.
>> Nothing collapses an organization quicker.
>> Vision casting.
>> Vision casting. So, here's what I think happened. They scheduled that final interview knowing it would be Charlie's last. They harvested his voice, his speech patterns, his thoughts on leadership transitions, and they used AI to create audio of him appointing Erica as CEO. They probably hoped he would say something like, "I appoint Erica naturally during that interview," but I can confirm he never did. So, they manufactured it using his own voice against him. This would mean Charlie Kirk's final interview was a voiceh harvesting operation. And in hindsight, it makes perfect sense. Why would Charlie be speaking at a restaurant entrepreneurship summit? It feels contrived. So, if true, Erica Kirk is running TPUSA based on AI cloned audio of her dead husband's voice created from his final interview hours before his assassination.
And I just don't really believe in coincidences.
It's crazy. That's from Mom Sleuth.
Mom Sleuth right there made that video.
Hope she makes more. Hope she goes a little deeper. And I invite you guys, like I said, this interview with Charlie, I have the transcript open.
Let's see here. Let me just move this.
This interview with Charlie is actually still up. I'm surprised they still have it up. Charlie Kirk's final interview.
Now, we're going to look into that just a little bit, right? Because listen to how it sounds versus the audio that you're hearing when he has the the the Afest intro, we'll just call it. So, listen to this versus the Afest intro.
>> I will spend like endless amounts of time. My day will be completely derailed. So, I have to try to put on very strict limits. Um, and then as an entrepreneur, you have to obviously have very strong spiritual health, whatever that is in your life. very strong obviously mental health, connection and relational health and then physical health. I think I see far too many entrepreneurs I could list five in my life that I know that just completely forsake the physical health when they're in growth mode, right? They're eating terribly, they're not sleeping, they're not exercising.
>> They'll get to it later. That's >> Yeah, they'll get to it later. And and when you're young, that's correct. But I actually would make an argument, not only is it bad for you, obviously health-wise, but like it actually makes you harder to run that business. Now, if you hear it, do you hear the same type of uh I don't know what to call it, echo pitch >> success.
But we have a great board and god forbid if something happens, they'll figure it out. I appoint my wife to run turning point USA. If something happens to me, Erica would do a great job.
>> A few weeks ago, while researching Charlie's, >> you hear that? It's very, very similar >> to grow that business. I think that people that are properly prioritizing sleep and properly prioritizing diet um are >> and if you put some if you do a little bit of tweaking here and there, you can really make what you're hearing here sound exactly like the Afest intro.
I don't know. I don't know. I mean, what this girl is saying when she's talking about this interview being the voice harvesting. Now, here's the thing. You don't need the last interview to be the one, but she is matching up a lot of the same things that he said from this interview in that Afest intro. So, that's interesting. But they can use just anything of him. But you would want to use the most recent thing because it will sound the most like him, the most like what people were used to hearing, right? If they use something from 10 years ago, not going to sound as much like Charlie. It's it's going to sound off to you. Even if you even if you have no idea what he sounded like 10 years ago, you're going to be like, "That's not what I remember hearing under the tent. You know, it's it's going to it's going to confuse you a little bit." Um, so they don't really need to just have it be one interview. They can do this based off many interviews. And in fact, the more hours of someone speaking that they use, the better for any kind of AI clone that they're going to make voice-wise. But I will say she is uh she's hitting on something. Now, I am going to look into the transcript a little bit. I invite you to look into the transcript as well. See what you can find. See if you can find him talk about Erica. You know, I'll I'll I'll do that one. I'll be the first one to uh to look into that. I'm assuming this girl already did, but let's see in the transcript. Does Erica come up at all?
Okay. So, there's no no found. So, anytime you search Erica, if you do it with a K and you're doing it in a transcript, it won't come up because the it's used to doing it with a C. Um, and now it's had a bunch of things come up, but also when you type it with a C, you also have America, right? So, America just popped up a bunch of times. So, nothing to do with Erica comes up in this one. I'm telling you, if you could go through a bunch of his videos, I think uh I think you'd find a lot more than what this girl has just stumbled onto, but she almost found the full sentence or at least half a sentence just within this one interview. She's taking a little bit from my theory and a little bit from Candace's theory or what Candace was actually told. I forget where Candace got her information from, but my theory was it was just stitched together. They just found parts of him talking and they just stitched it together. But then when Candace found that company, oh yeah, that's right. She found out the company that they were approached by approached uh that the company that approached them. They found that company. So that that is good. But also, you know, I guess this girl's like combining both of those theories together. Um voice harvesting is something you do for AI cloning and then piecing it all together. That's something that you would just do in editing. Um, I guess AI could do that as well because AI could do pretty much everything. That's why it's the worst thing in the world because it could just take over all our jobs in a matter of minutes and it's happening day after day. Day after day, there's an industry that just falls apart. Um, side conversation.
Let's not do doom and gloom right now, guys. Still drinking your coffee.
What are we doing here? Right.
But I do find it interesting and uh I'm gonna dig a little deeper because this is exactly what I was saying. I was saying this exact thing. I'm like, if you can look into the videos, but then when Candace brought up how many of them are deleted, I don't know if we'll ever find it. But I think we should all look, should all take a a definite look. But let me know what you think about Mom Sleuth and what Mom Sleuth was bringing to you guys. Let me know if you think Mom Sleuth is correct about this whole thing. Is she right? Is she wrong? What do you think about her theory? What do you think about the interview? Please go and check out the interview again. It's called Charlie's final interview. Go and check it out. See if you can hear what I'm hearing and what she's hearing. Anyways guys, that is all I got for you today.
I'm out of here.
Videos Relacionados
OpenHuman VS Hermes AI: Who Wins?
JulianGoldieSEO
285 views•2026-05-29
BREAKING: Microsoft’s New Image Generating Model Beat Out GPT 1.5 and Nano Banana 2
aimmediahouse
122 views•2026-06-03
Long-Running Agents — Build an Agent That Never Forgets with Google ADK
suryakunju
142 views•2026-05-30
This computer is made from real human brain cells. And you can buy it.
Talktmsmedia
3K views•2026-05-28
I Made the Same Anime Fight Scene in Every AI Video Generator
NobleGooseAnime
295 views•2026-05-30
Nvidia Bets Big On AI PCs | New Chip To Power Windows Laptops | Technology | AI Updates | N18S
cnnnews18
3K views•2026-06-01
I Tested NEW Opus 4.8 on Four Projects (Updated LLM Leaderboard)
AICodingDaily
298 views•2026-05-29
3D Platformer Update - NO CAPES
SolarLune
294 views•2026-05-30











