'Forget Nukes': Iran's 3-Point Offer To U.S. As Putin Hosts Khamenei Aide In Moscow | DETAILS

追加: 2026-05-05

[00:00:00]In a bombshell escalation, Iran slams down a non-negotiable three-phase ultimatum via secret mediators, vowing direct talks with America resume only if Washington gravels to Thrron's ironclad demands.

[00:00:17]According to a report by Al-Myadin's correspondent in Thrron, Iran has informed mediators of a proposed three-phase framework for negotiations with the United States and signaled that talks could resume if Washington agrees to the plan. The report suggests Tyrron is attempting to reshape the order of discussions by placing security guarantees ahead of every other issue.

[00:00:43]The first phase of the reported proposal focuses on ending what Iran describes as USIsraeli aggression and securing guarantees that military action will not resume against Iran or Lebanon.

[00:00:55]Al-Mayaden reports that during this opening stage, Thrron would refuse to discuss any other matter until those assurances are formally secured.

[00:01:07]If the first phase succeeds, the second stage would reportedly move toward the management of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical energy choke points. The plan is said to involve coordination with Oman to create a new legal framework governing the strategic waterway. Any shift there could immediately affect global shipping routes and oil prices.

[00:01:30]Only after agreements are reached in the first two phases would Iran reportedly agree to discuss its nuclear program.

[00:01:36]This sequencing indicates Tyrron wants regional security and maritime leverage settled before entering the most contentious diplomatic file.

[00:01:47]These developments come as Iranian foreign minister Abbas Iraqi has departed from Moscow leading a diplomatic delegation. Iranian ambassador Kazam Jalali said Iraqi is expected to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin for consultations on the latest developments regarding negotiations and the ceasefire.

[00:02:06]If confirmed, the plan signals a bold Iranian attempt to rewrite the diplomatic agenda while bringing Moscow deeper into the process. The next moves from Washington and Russia could decide whether this becomes a breakthrough or another dangerous deadlock. Meanwhile, Iran's Parliament security chief, Ibrahim Azizi, drops a defiant hammer.

[00:02:26]Thrron flatly rejects any nuclear talks with the United States, slamming the door on Washington for good. There are absolutely no grounds for engaging in uh any negotiations with the Americans and of course especially regarding the nuclear issue. There has never been any foundation for such talks >> was enrichment and our red line has consistently been that enrichment must be recognized as an undeniable reality because we believe enrichment as the martyed Imam himself stated of course every every war without exception uh ultimately concludes with some form of negotiation and assistance >> negotiate no war not even world war I one or two failed to eventually reach certain stages of resolution but we believe that this still needs to uh the Zionist regime must in particular uh be subjected to a far more stringent and resolute cause of action and be compelled to receive a response that is entirely proportionate to the malevolent acts it has perpetrated. The legitimate and inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran in this trade must be fully recognized and upheld. Payment must be made in Iran's national currency, the real. This plan stipulates that the Zionist regime, vessels belonging to the Zionist regime, cargo, freight or any vessel are not permitted to uh transit under any pretext.

[00:03:53]>> It won't end.

[00:03:54]>> Even if we give 400 kg, the problem won't be resolved. Without a doubt, the Americans will only increase their demands. What has led us to victory is our steadfastness, our resistance, and preventing the Americans excessive demands and overreach.

[00:04:18]Diplomacy over Iran has hit another sudden twist, and this time the signals are more confusing than ever. US President Donald Trump has abruptly cancelled a planned trip by his top envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff to Pakistan. Talks that were meant to revive fragile ceasefire negotiations with Iran.

[00:04:44]The decision was described by Trump himself as a matter of practicality.

[00:04:49]Posting on Truth Social, he dismissed the visit as a waste of time, citing internal confusion within Iran's leadership and insisting, "We have all the cards. They have none."

[00:05:02]But behind that blunt message lies a deeper uncertainty. Trump has made it clear that cancelling the trip does not automatically mean a return to war. He said, "We haven't thought about it yet."

[00:05:16]Leaving the door open, but offering no clear direction. At the same time, he added, "They can call us anytime they want," suggesting Washington still expects Thran to make the next move.

[00:05:30]On the ground, the optics tell their own story. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Arakchi had already left Islamabad just as US envoys were expected to arrive.

[00:05:43]Instead of waiting, he moved on to Oman, the next stop in a fast-moving diplomatic tour.

[00:05:51]And his message was cautious, even skeptical. While praising Pakistani's mediation efforts, Iraqi openly questioned whether the United States is truly serious about diplomacy. He said, "We have yet to see." Casting doubt on Washington's intentions.

[00:06:10]The result is a moment defined by mixed signals. Talks are not officially dead, but they are no longer moving forward either. Messages are being sent, but not directly, and both sides appear to be waiting for the other to blink first.

[00:06:26]For now, the path to peace remains open, but increasingly uncertain.

[00:06:34]A leaked memo has shaken Washington, contradicting Donald Trump's claims of a military strike on Iran being a purely American strategy. A US State Department memo published on April 21 by legal adviser Reed D. Rubenstein outlines the justification for the US military strikes launched on February 28th. The memo explicitly states that the United States is engaged in the war at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally, invoking article 51 of the UN charter.

[00:07:08]Donald Trump has maintained that his decision to attack Iran was not influenced by Israel. In a truth social post, the US president said, and I quote, "Israel never talked me into the war with Iran. The results of October 7th added to my lifelong opinion that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.

[00:07:27]Did I watch and read the fake news pundits and polls in total disbelief?

[00:07:32]90% of what they say are lies and madeup stories and the polls are rigged much as the 2020 presidential election was rigged. In March, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said that Israel reportedly weighed on a preemptive strike on Iran.

[00:07:48]>> We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties. However, Trump had rejected the framing while speaking to reporters at the start of an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Frederick Mertz. Mr. >> President, did Israel force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran? Did not pull the United States into this war?

[00:08:15]>> No, I might have forced their hand. U you see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. if we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. And we have great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successfully. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So if anything, I might have forced Israel's hand, but Israel was ready and we were ready. and we've we've had a >> Trump had then dismissed suggestions that Netanyahu influenced his decision to strike Iran. The memo's language emphasizes coordination with and support for the Israeli side as a central legal basis for the operation. Iran has now accused the United States of seeking a face-saving exit from the war.