The brutal 1497 assassination of Giovanni Borgia, the favorite son of Pope Alexander VI, remains one of history's most enduring murder mysteries. Despite extensive investigation, no conclusive evidence has emerged to definitively identify the killer. Multiple suspects have been proposed: Cesare Borgia, who was jealous of his brother's favors from their father; Joffre Borgia, who may have been enraged by his wife's affair with Giovanni; and the Orsini family, who had a long-standing feud with the Borgias. Forensic analysis reveals that the multiple stab wounds and throat cut caused rapid death with minimal blood loss, consistent with a professional hit. The case illustrates how Renaissance Rome was a place of political intrigue, scandal, and violence, where family rivalries and power struggles often led to brutal murders.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
The Brutal Murder of the Pope's Son! | Medieval Murder Mysteries | Season 1 Episode 6Added:
While most historical murder mysteries were solved not long after the crime was committed, sometimes it's left up to modern science and historians [music] to determine how and why a person died.
In this series, we look at some of the great unsolved deaths of the past, bringing to [music] life the many theories surrounding them and piecing together the evidence.
Hundreds of years may have passed [music] since these events took place, but with the help of forensics, criminologists, and specialist experts, we will attempt to solve these medieval murder mysteries. According to the official line, he died in a drunken brawl. Perfectly acceptable story is that they were smothered.
And so died King Edward the Second.
Murder.
And legend has it that Prince Arthur died of the shock of castration. It's a possibility.
But on the other hand, it's a most unreliable way of killing somebody.
Rome, 1497.
>> [music] >> A richly attired but brutally mutilated body is pulled from the Tiber River.
He would soon be identified as Juan Borgia, the son of the head of the Holy Roman Empire, Pope Alexander the VI.
Stabbed as many as eight times and his throat slashed, this was no random attack.
But why he was murdered and who carried it [music] out has been the subject of speculation for over 500 years.
Some believe he was killed out of jealousy on the orders of his younger brother, Jofre.
Jofre definitely had a motive. By today's standards, his wife is having an affair with the man. For some people, that would be enough to kill somebody.
You're also looking at the fact that he's quite low down in the pecking order of the family. So, if he gets rid of those upper tiers, he he's going to get promoted, as it were.
Others think he was murdered by the Orsini, the rival family of the Borgia dynasty.
The Orsini dynasty hated the Borgias.
The Pope, his father, had a hand in the leader of the dynasty's death, and it looked like revenge.
And there are those who say that his older brother, Cesare Borgia, planned his assassination.
It was Cesare.
He was jealous of the honors and the titles that his father, the Pope, had bestowed upon him.
And he realized the only way to get rid of his rival was in the good [music] old Borgia tradition, murder.
Just what did happen to Juan Borgia?
During the 15th century, Renaissance Italy was dominated by rich and powerful families.
And one of the most notorious dynasties of the time were the Borgias.
Originally from Valencia in Spain, they'd made a name for themselves by working their way up the ecclesiastical ranks in the Vatican.
In doing so, they'd acquired huge sums of wealth along the way and a fearsome reputation.
The Borgias are possibly one of the most powerful families that have ever lived.
In today's society, we look at money and say that's what's [music] power is, but back then, religion, politics, money were all the same thing. You can't separate religion from politics. [music] So, if you really want to be the top man, you've got to be the Pope. And if you are the Pope, you are the most powerful man there is.
The Borgias were a Spanish family in Renaissance Italy. Um they furnished two Popes.
And they were, I suppose you could say, the precursor of the Mafia.
And they were the byword for avarice, pride, intrigue, murder, and depravity.
These are not the qualities you would expect of religious leaders.
But despite their reputation, Rodrigo Borgia was the second member of his family to be elected pontiff. Such was the influence they wielded. Ah, man.
He had been introduced to the church by his uncle, Alfonso Borgia, better known as Pope Calixtus the III, who had made Rodrigo a cardinal.
Rodrigo was a skilled negotiator and politician who had studied law.
It was alleged at the time that he had gained votes through bribery and blackmail.
Today, we think of the Pope as being a holy man. Obviously, that's why he's the Pope. But in those days, it they were ready in tooth and claw. Um they were the most ambitious people on [music] Earth because actually, in those days, the Pope was the most powerful person on Earth.
Um and so, it all power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. And they were pretty damn corrupt.
In 1492, he became Pope Alexander the VI, leader of the Roman Catholic Church. But his reign was marred by scandal and controversy.
He spent excessively and was known to have relationships with several women.
If you had papal infallibility, as Pope Alexander the VI did, he could literally do anything and claim, well, God made me do it.
Rodrigo Borgia became the Pope, Alexander the VI.
Uh and like, I think a third of the College of Cardinals had mistresses and children.
But all of the the Popes before him referred to their illegitimate children as nieces and nephews.
But it it just goes to show what this guy was made of, cuz he was quite happy to let people know that he actually sired at least eight children.
And so, this guy didn't care what anybody thought of him.
He was all powerful. He was the Pope.
While still a cardinal, he had carried on an illicit relationship with a woman called Vannozza dei Cattanei, with whom he fathered four children.
A daughter named Lucrezia and three sons, Jofre, Cesare, and Giovanni.
But not only had illegitimate children, as lots of Popes did, but openly declared that he had illegitimate children.
Now, that shows you the sort of power that a Pope has. Most Popes, as we know now, obviously aren't supposed to have any relations at all, let alone children. Yet, it shows you the corruption that carried on at that time in history and throughout the church.
The Pope was was all powerful.
He was God's anointed on this planet, put here by God to rule all of us. And certainly, Alexander the VI realized the power that he got.
And he used it not always in the best way.
Alexander used his position as Pope to further his and his family's personal fortune.
He gave his children titles, land, and vast amounts of wealth, the majority of which went to Giovanni.
Pope Alexander had a desire to magnify all of his eight children.
And he did this openly, in any way that he could find. He he would put them, for want of a better word, at the top of the ladder. And woe betide anyone who got in the way.
He had one favorite, um and his name was Giovanni, uh often known as Juan.
He set up a special papal duchy for him.
Um he also made him captain general of of the papal army.
This is a man who thought he almost was godlike. Uh he's a man who [music] thinks of himself as quite possibly being a star.
He's untouchable. He's His dad's the Pope. Who's going to do anything to him?
>> [music] >> Um this is a man who can't be attacked.
He can't be prosecuted. He can't be uh blamed for anything. He will always He's got to get out of jail free card for everything.
Almost certainly, Giovanni was not a holy man. Um rather like his father, the Pope, he partied hard, like they all did. He had guards at his command to take out his enemies whenever he wanted.
Um he just loved it.
Giovanni seems to have been Alexander's favorite son.
However, his admiration was not shared by others.
He was noted for his arrogance, >> [music] >> rudeness, and debauched lifestyle.
It was reported by many chroniclers of the age that he spent the majority of his time drinking, gambling, and visiting brothels.
Young Giovanni had a habit of upsetting people. He was arrogant, [music] and he just had an ability of of putting people's backs up to say the least.
He was extremely loose. In fact, he was he was putting it about all over Rome, basically. He of all the Borgias was the one that people I would say disliked more than anybody else and and for that reason made many enemies.
Giovanni could even count his own sister-in-law among his amorous conquests.
Sancha of Aragon was the daughter of Alfonso II of Naples. She had married the much younger Joffre Borgia when he was only 12 years old. The marriage was a political one arranged by Pope Alexander in exchange for her hand and a large dowry. Alexander agreed to support Alfonso's claim to the throne of Naples.
His brother's wife was I would say quite an accommodating woman.
And she certainly wasn't out of bounds for him and quite possibly not out of bounds for well for for half of Italy.
Despite his behavior, it seemed as if Giovanni could do no wrong.
To celebrate all the honors that his father had heaped on him, his mother threw a party for him.
He and his brothers and some other relatives and obviously lots of other uh went along to this this grand do.
Um and when they left, he rode off with his servants um and a couple of his brothers and some of the others. And somewhere along the road uh he decided to break off from the main party.
It was reported that Giovanni had told the others that he was off to find further pleasures, possibly referring to one of the many brothels he regularly frequented.
Giovanni never did return home. His father, the Pope, was was concerned, to say the least, but not too concerned at the beginning because he knew his son only too well and presumed that he'd visited a young lady or had a gone to a party and and stayed over.
It was the next day when he still didn't return that father started, for want of a better word, to get a little worried.
At first, no one suspected anything was wrong.
It wasn't unusual for Giovanni to go missing when he was out partaking in the delights that Rome had to offer.
The Pope sent out everybody, really. He pulled out all the plugs and just saying, "That's it. I need to know what's happened." It was his favorite son, after all.
He instigated a 300-strong search party.
Eventually, search party sent by the Vatican made a gruesome discovery.
>> [groaning and screaming] >> The following day, a body was dragged out of the Tiber.
It had several knife wounds and the throat had been cut.
And it was Giovanni.
The interesting thing when they found his body was that he hadn't actually been robbed. What proved it [music] really to be some form of assassination was he still had everything. He still had his money, he still had his clothes, he still had his dagger attached to him as well.
With Giovanni having made so many enemies, there are plenty of suspects to choose from.
But many people now believe that his brother, Cesare, may have been behind the brutal killing.
Author and historian Richard Felix believes that jealousy and greed may have been the motive for murder.
Cesare was extremely jealous of his brother Giovanni.
He was jealous of the honors [music] and the titles that his father, the Pope, had bestowed upon him. And he realized the only [music] way to get rid of his rival was in the good old Borgia tradition, murder.
He hired two assassins. They attacked [music] Giovanni on the road.
He stabbed him several times in the stomach >> [screaming] >> and then delivered the coup de grace and they slit his throat from ear to ear.
And then they threw his body in the river Tiber.
Cesare.
>> [music] >> I think the real motive, if Cesare did it, was jealousy. He was extremely jealous of his of his brother who the Pope had bestowed all manner of titles on him and money. He was allowed as many mistresses as he wanted.
And yet poor old Cesare really was always the underdog.
And there's no doubt about it that Cesare had murderous intentions.
Cesare wouldn't have committed the murder himself, but he certainly had the the wherewithal to be able to do it. He he he had the money, he had the motive, and he knew plenty of people that he could call on. He was a Borgia.
Since childhood, Cesare had been close friends with a man known as Micheletto Corella.
He was a condottiere, a type of professional mercenary who had been employed by Cesare throughout his military career. Corella owed everything he had to Cesare and proved his gratitude on several occasions by ruthlessly murdering his enemies when ordered.
>> [music] >> It seems possible that Cesare's envy could have driven him to organize the murder of his brother.
He certainly had a lot to gain from his death in terms of land, wealth, and title.
But what would a modern-day barrister, forensic pathologist, and criminal psychologist make of this theory?
>> [music] >> Professor Michael Green is a former Home Office pathologist with over 40 years of crime scene experience.
Could Giovanni's corpse have provided any clues as to who may have killed him?
A cutthroat, it is surprising how little blood there sometime is because a really determined homicidal cutthroat, you know, grab the bloke's head and pull it back and yippee, off you go.
You're going to not just cut the big vessels, the carotid artery and the jugular vein, but you're going to cut the windpipe.
But the particular thing about a cutthroat is once you've cut the great veins, air goes down them into the right side of chambers [music] of the heart. A massive bubbles form.
This is what's called an air embolism.
And it's like getting [music] air in your central heating pump.
The circulation around the central heating system stops working. Likewise, once you fill the right atrium and right ventricle with bubbles, which takes a matter of seconds, there ain't no circulation, so there ain't no spurting from the vessels in the neck. So, okay, there'll be drainage afterwards, but the actual [music] homicidal event, there'll be cast off from the knife while you're doing that, cast off after you've done that, but there won't be the dramatic blood everywhere. So, [music] the Borgia scene could have been remarkably clean.
>> [music] >> Would there have been any way of determining how many people were involved in the actual murder?
The only way you can tell how many people were involved is from disturbance of the scene and things like boot marks.
You might be able to tell how many people. If it was very obvious from the pattern and the appearance of the stab wounds that more than one knife had been used, you could say [music] that more than one person was involved, but I think that's the best you could do and it would only be informed guesswork.
>> [music] >> Could the favoritism that Pope Alexander showed Giovanni have caused Cesare to go to such extremes?
Dr. Kieran O'Keefe is a criminal psychologist who assesses the methods and motives behind crimes such as murder.
If you've got a family situation where one sibling is a particular favorite, it can create a lot of animosity [music] to the other siblings.
When we talk about people who commit crime and look at >> [music] >> reasons for them committing a crime in childhood, one thing we talk about is maternal disruption or even family disruption. And an aspect [music] of that is maternal attachment or even paternal attachment.
If there's a disruption to a typical loving relationship that you would have with a father or mother, then it can affect them in [music] terms of mulling over in in terms of revenge fantasies. They either play out those revenge fantasies [music] against somebody else or against the person that's responsible [music] for the disruption to attachment, so either the father or mother, or they'll see the person responsible as being that sibling.
[music] And so they'll play out their fantasy and kill that sibling.
It's not surprising if you take that idea >> [music] >> and add the jealousy factor as well, which would have been rife in that particular family. And add that and that would have fueled fantasies of murder as well. But because you've got jealousy, I'm not surprised [music] that that was the end point.
Would jealousy and sibling rivalry be enough reason for someone to murder their own brother?
Andrew Rose is a former barrister and QC. He has both defended and prosecuted at numerous criminal trials over his career.
Jealousy is a frequent motive for murder. It could be sexual jealousy, jealousy of the power of somebody, all sorts of all sorts of jealousies >> [music] >> leading up to a desire to kill somebody.
It's not I think at all unusual that should be so. And sometimes motives can be mixed. It's very difficult sometimes to compartmentalize these things because all sorts of factors can apply in motivating somebody to kill somebody else. But jealousy is a jolly powerful motive.
It certainly seems like Cesare would have had the motive to want Giovanni dead.
But he wasn't the only family member to bear a grudge against him.
Geoffrey Borgia, the youngest brother, had equally as much reason to hate Giovanni.
But would he have ordered his murder?
Ross Andrews is an author and researcher of historical mysteries. [music] He believes that Geoffrey may have had his brother killed because of an affair he was having with his wife.
Now in Giovanni's death, we have one of the greatest and [music] grizzly murder mysteries throughout the whole of history. This is a man who's he's had his throat slit.
He's been stabbed about eight times.
He's been thrown into the River Tiber.
And to make sure they've even weighed him down using rocks. This is obviously a hit. Now, our prime suspect [music] is probably Geoffrey due to the fact that he has means, he has method, and most definitely has motive.
It's not as if Geoffrey can even ignore what's been going on. And with Giovanni, we have a man that will openly flaunt whatever he's doing. He thinks he's untouchable. He thinks he can get away with anything he wants. So he can get completely drunk and sleep with whoever he wants and nothing can happen. It's not like Geoffrey can just walk away and ignore what's happening.
Now with all murder mysteries throughout the whole of history, you've got to look at means, method, motive, and try and find out who's done this. Now, Geoffrey definitely had a motive. [music] By today's standards, his wife is having an affair with the man. For some people, that would be enough to kill somebody.
You're also looking at the fact that he's quite low down in the pecking order of the family. So if he gets rid of those upper tiers, he's going to get promoted, as it were.
Now, does he have means and method?
Well, certainly he knows that he's going to be at this family gathering. [music] So he knows where he's going to be. His guard is going to be down. He's highly likely to be drunk.
It presents with a fantastic means there because when he leaves, he dismisses all of his staff, which is the perfect opportunity to try and get rid of him.
So if anybody is on our prime [music] list of suspects, Geoffrey has to be right up there near the top.
Could the indignation of his wife's affair with his brother have driven Geoffrey to murder?
We've already got jealousy of a sibling who seems to be favored. Now we've got jealousy added in terms of a relationship that's going on that's that's inappropriate, that's a particular young lady who's loose with her favors. I could imagine the jealousy building up. It's part of the what I talk about in terms of >> [music] >> Athens stage theory and and there's something to do with what what we say is symbolic interactionism, that maybe it's not about a genetic predisposition, maybe it's not about, you know, a psychological predisposition, maybe it's not about the upbringing or the environment. Maybe it's simply about social interaction.
And the social interaction would have been this affair that was going on and the jealousy that was felt in terms of that particular relationship. And that could be building up and fueling fantasies to try and resolve that in some way or at least take the attention away from that particular person or from the brother.
Reportedly, Giovanni was less than discreet about their liaisons.
Geoffrey ordered the hit. His wife is having an affair. The tipping point is really when he finds out that Giovanni is actually the one that she's sleeping with.
Giovanni can even turn around to his younger brother and say, "I don't care what you think. I'm going to be doing this anyway." This is a man who thinks he can get away with anything. So Geoffrey's stuck being humiliated with the whole court, as it were, and society laughing in his face.
But despite what he had done, he was still Geoffrey's brother.
So would he [music] really have wanted him dead?
Murdering within families does occur, plainly. I don't think it's particularly frequent.
But obviously within the family, there are motivations, tensions, and opportunities for people to advance themselves, as they see it.
And if they have a ruthless disposition, they may want to carry it into action.
It's it's a an unfortunate aspect of the human condition.
And of course with family members, you know so much more about their habits and personalities.
An opportunity for covering up your tracks if you're being evilly minded is that much greater cuz you know how things operate within your particular family unit.
It seems as if Giovanni's actions would have given Geoffrey a motive for murder.
But it wasn't just people in his own family who wanted him dead.
There were other powerful families in Rome who wanted him to disappear, too.
And none more [music] so than the House of Orsini.
Lynn [music] Picknett is an author and historical researcher. She believes that Giovanni was the victim [music] of a plot between his own siblings and long-term rivals of the Borgias, the powerful Orsini family.
Giovanni attended [music] a party thrown in his honor.
That was the last time he was seen alive.
Just 2 days later, [music] his body was pulled from the River Tiber, horribly mutilated.
It was an [music] assassination. Who could have done it?
Almost certainly it was the Orsini family, but they couldn't have done [music] it without some inside help.
The finger points at his own family.
>> [music] >> There'll be lots of people who wanted him dead.
But there were standout suspects. The main one was the Orsini dynasty [music] because the Pope, his father, had a hand in the leader of the dynasty's death several months before in jail. He had basically colluded with King Ferdinand of Naples in having Virginio, the leader of the Orsinis, imprisoned. And he died in prison very suspiciously, presumably poisoned.
In 1494, King Charles the VIII of France invaded Rome.
He demanded that the Pope recognize his to the throne of Naples and attempted to overthrow Alfonso II in the hope of securing further land and wealth for his family. Virginio Orsini had assisted King Charles in his conquest.
But when the French were defeated, Alfonso imprisoned Virginio for his betrayal.
It was said that with the Pope's blessing, Virginio was then poisoned.
People were pointing the finger towards the Pope. So, [snorts] basically, there was the the much loathed son of a much loathed Pope. Um >> [music] >> and it looked like revenge.
But there was a huge element of inside information about this. You know, they knew where he was riding to even though he changed his plans at the last minute.
It's very likely that there was somebody else, perhaps in Giovanni's own household or in his mother's household, [music] who basically gave them information.
There's always the possibility [music] that one or more of his brothers also gave information to the Orsinis [music] because they really wanted their brother dead.
Cesare had been standing on the sidelines [music] watching his father, the Pope, heap honors and status [music] and you name it on his favorite son, Giovanni. And all the time there's Cesare thinking, "No, that's that's mine. That's mine. I want that. Why don't I get any of this?"
>> [music] >> So, the ultimate sibling rivalry could have been behind um the death of his brother.
There are have been quite a lot of suggestion that in fact Joffre had a hand in the assassination of Giovanni.
It's often said that Giovanni made fast and loose with uh the wife of his brother, Joffre.
Now, he could [music] have colluded with the Orsini dynasty to have him um assassinated. Nothing surprises one about politics in those days. You might think on paper, well, you know, what would a Borgia be doing colluding with an Orsini?
Indeed. But if there was something in it for them at [music] the time, why not?
>> [music] >> Could a power struggle between the Orsinis and Borgias have led to Giovanni's murder?
As far as the rivalry between the Borgias and the Orsinis, this is pretty typical of Italian history of that period. Um clearly it does persist >> [music] >> to this day. We we know there are rivalries between family groups in within the Mafia structure. I think in Italy that you'll find that and in [music] areas where there are family blood feuds which go on for centuries, generations in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
>> [music] >> Um these are deeply embedded in human nature and almost impossible to eradicate.
>> [music] >> By killing Giovanni in such a brutal way, were the Orsini trying to send a message [music] to Pope Alexander?
We're trying to go with the theory that the killing of Juan was was a message [music] that was sent between the families. Um we'd have to look at how the body was found. Um was the body uh concealed in any way? And when we talk about psychological profiling and looking at killers, we talk about abduction site and dump site.
[music] So, where is the person abducted?
And then where are they killed? And then where is the body dumped?
If you're sending a message, then the body would be easily found. If the body was easily found, then yes, potentially what we're looking at is a message that's being sent.
[music] If it's being concealed in any way and there's an element of not wanting the body to be discovered, then no, it's not a message. Unless the message you want to give is that Juan has gone missing.
But ultimately, if you're not owning up to that, if you're not showing that there's a body, then really you're just creating doubt about has he run off? Has he had an accident?
Anything, you know? So, the body would have to be easily found for it to [music] be a message.
If they weren't trying to send a message, why was Giovanni's body so badly mutilated?
There are very few stab wounds that cause immediate death. This comes as a surprise [music] to people.
But even if you stab somebody in the heart, classically, the knife goes between [music] the ribs and it goes into one of the chambers of the heart, usually the right ventricle.
The blood then accumulates between the heart and the bag in which it's suspended, [music] the so-called pericardium.
And you can go two to three minutes, four minutes before the compression of the heart by the blood around it stops it beating effectively. I think in the case of Juan Borgia, what almost certainly happened was he was immobilized with his six or seven stab wounds and then once he is weakened, [music] you see, if he's stabbed in the belly, for example, and it hits the aorta, he's going to lose half his circulating blood volume into his belly within a matter of minutes.
But once he is enfeebled by the stab wounds, then it's going to be very easy to [music] just get hold of him and finish him off. Death is going to occur within seconds, which is why in real life there is often very little blood at the scene of a cut throat.
Could it be possible that one of his brothers, along with the Orsini family, put aside their rivalry to work together in getting rid of a common enemy?
Giovanni's death would have been a mutual benefit to both parties, each of whom were well known for their ruthless and cutthroat ways.
But when all the theories and evidence are taken into account, what are we left with?
>> [music] [music] >> There is no doubt that Giovanni was murdered, but who did it and what was their motivation?
With so many people having grievances against him, it's hard to separate the innocent from the guilty.
Could Cesare, angry and hurt by his father's constant favoritism of Giovanni, have carefully planned the death of his own brother?
Was Joffre so enraged that his wife was having an affair with his brother that he hired assassins to murder Giovanni?
Or did the Orsini dynasty, with the help of Giovanni's own family, kill the favorite son of the Pope and throw his body into the river?
With over 500 years having passed since the events took place, it's hard to separate fact from fiction.
But is there any conclusive evidence that points the finger at the real person behind the murder of Giovanni Borgia?
>> [music] [music] >> Do the details of the murder tell us anything about the motive behind the attack?
When we look at psychological profiling and the idea that you can look at a crime scene and how a how a body is left at a crime scene and get an idea of the motivation for the murder, and we apply it to this particular case where the body was found with multiple stab wounds but without any of the money taken, the immediate thing that jumps to mind is that the motivation is is a personal one and that it's a revenge one. Now, in this particular case, the anger and the revenge is focused on that particular individual and that would be an an immediate motivation that we would that we would say is occurring just because of the number of stab wounds. If it's a single wound, then it would be for other particular reasons. And if it was a single wound, we'd either look at an assassination attempt or for straight away I'd be saying, you know, is there money has their money been taken? Simple as that. But because you've got multiple stab wounds, >> [music] >> immediately I think, yeah, personal nature and anger and revenge of some sort.
Will we ever know the exact reason for why Giovanni was killed? In the case of Juan Borgia, it's particularly difficult. The the trails are so tangled.
There was motivation from a number of angles here.
A number of parties could have been responsible for his death.
And there may even been parties of which we know not. He may have offended somebody. A slight honor played a great part in in in life in Italy at that time.
>> [music] >> This could have led to a murder. Uh it's a fascinating case, but I don't think it'll ever be solved conclusively.
Renaissance Rome, and in particular the Vatican, was a place of politics, scandal, and intrigue.
Those involved at the highest levels of office rarely got there solely on their religious merits and the Borgias were no exception.
Giovanni's father had given him everything he desired and more than he deserved.
But despite the favors bestowed upon him, Giovanni continued to cause upset and make powerful enemies.
Giovanni's affair with Joffrey's wife would have given him ample motive to want Giovanni dead.
However, his marriage to Sancha was one of convenience rather than love and Joffrey was only 15 years old at the time and reportedly uninterested in his wife.
It seems unlikely that he would have gone so far as to organize the murder of his brother.
Sancha of Aragon was even by the standards of the courts then rather loose in her morals.
Cesare, on the other hand, was known to be an accomplished murderer.
He had grown tired of his brother's public antics and accused him of embarrassing the family and bringing the Borgia name into disrepute.
He was also said to be jealous of the favors their father showed Giovanni.
Favors that with Giovanni out the way would now fall on him.
Cesare was never happy with the all the honors and titles and status heaped on on his brother.
Cesare, therefore, does seem to be the most likely suspect, but did he act alone?
Pope Alexander had had a long-running feud with the Orsinis.
They had been involved in a power struggle for the kingdom of Naples, which was an Orsini stronghold.
Five months before Giovanni's death, it was reported that Pope Alexander had ordered the murder of Virginia Orsini, a leading member of the family.
It wouldn't be unrealistic to consider the possibility that Cesare and the Orsinis conspired together to assassinate Giovanni.
>> [music] >> But the death of his son had a lasting impact on the Pope.
The Pope went into severe mourning. He was absolutely devastated at the death of his favorite son.
And he blamed himself.
He thought that this was God's way of punishing him for his life of debauchery.
>> [music] >> The Pope eventually died of a mystery illness.
Some say as a result of being poisoned.
Now, without the protection of his father, Cesare, who had assumed Giovanni's role as head of the papal army, lost the backing of the Vatican.
When Pope Julius II was voted in, he stripped Cesare of his honors, forcing him to flee to Pamplona in Spain, where he was given work as a military commander by one of his few remaining allies.
>> [music] >> And in 1507, while leading his soldiers in a small skirmish, Cesare was fatally wounded by a spear.
His body was taken to a small church in the town of Viana in Portugal, where with little ceremony, he was buried along with what was left of the Borgia dynasty.
Related Videos
They Said Flight Was Impossible—Then Two Bicycle Mechanics Changed Everything#wrightbrothers
umars997
526 views•2026-05-30
#SeamansAct1915 #MaritimeHistory #LifeAtSea #BoatShitCrazyX #SaferWorkEnvironment
BoatShitCrazyX
859 views•2026-06-01
Black Women Were Banned From White Suffrage Groups
Peoplediduknow
782 views•2026-05-31
A Volcano Created Frankenstein — And Killed Summer for a Year
TheDarkSideOfSmth
389 views•2026-05-29
Born into slavery in Beaufort
RoadsanRoots
613 views•2026-05-31
50.32 Judah And Israel Split / Jeroboam's False Religion - 2 Chronicles ch. 10-11
smyrnachristianchurchkokomo
107 views•2026-05-29
Iran's Secret Society Wrote the Constitution — Then Got Hanged for It
TheShadowLecture
502 views•2026-05-29
How the Qing Dynasty's Imperial Harem System Actually Worked
HiddenTime360
580 views•2026-05-28











