The Supreme Court is hearing cases regarding the regularization of contractual special educators across multiple Indian states, with the court directing states to file updated status reports on appointment progress and screening committee data, while addressing concerns about examination compliance and the distinction between regular and contractual posts.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Special Educator Supreme Court Today Hearing Update ।। अगली सुनवाई कौन कौन से राज्यों की होगी ।।Added:
blood my friend has to add something number so and so give the particulars OA number so and so of so and so here preferred by the applicants in you have filed an intervention here >> yes >> give the number applicants in IIA so and so are left free >> to pursue their remedy before the central administrative tribunal chandigar bench >> may I just read the operative question In view of such position, so and so directed to file the details of qu the compliance of direction of the Supreme Court in the above matter. That is what the cat has said.
>> We have we have left it open for the cat to decide your entitlement.
>> The cat decide the entitlement of the petitioners before it for appointment in the post influenced by then your lo uninfluenced by what we have filed here.
For the 23 posts which are reserved for contractual teachers not uninfluential we placed on record that 16 of the 23 contractual teachers had participated in the written examination conducted by the UT administration and it is reported that they could not qualify in such examination.
The effect of such Could I pause there for a moment?
>> The the the effect of uh the the the applicants not being able to succeed in the qualifying examination is left open for position by the cat.
>> You raise all these points.
>> Lord, may I make >> your intervention is disposed.
>> Lord, this your lordship has said could not qualify. There was no cut off mark.
Yes. Would that make a difference? Lord, then may I request this just a small thing. Lord your lordship would your lordship has said just on whether how that politification or lack there your lordship may say lord uh in conssonance with your earlier orders of this honorable court let both of them be weighed together by the sat by the cat >> we are not deciding all points are kept open we are not deciding anything >> then your lord should be that >> all points are kept open >> yes tell us last week we have received the information out of 97 post 84 are regular uh especially has been appointed 84 >> not it's not on the record 84 >> 84 and 23 contractual >> if appointments are being made after your affidavit and when you know 2 three weeks in advance that chandigar will be taken up today why don't you come with an upto-ate status report sorry I'll give you >> you should have done it >> sorry >> we will record your statement someday some after some time council will be changed Anomalies will appear somebody else will come and say no no no no that's a misrepresentation we will not record anything from any council unless it is on aid Mr. Micas Mr. Mr. Malutra Micas pointing to the affidavit filed by UT Chandigard on 16th July 2025 submits that substantial progress has been made for appointment of special teachers out of 96 posts which were advertised.
36 posts have been filled up.
It is also submitted that 23 posts for contractual teachers have been reserved.
The affidavit says that out of 20 21 rci qualified candidates appeared in the written examination but were not found qualified in such test.
Be the may having regard to the submission made by land council for the UT administration that further appointments have been made. We grant the administration further two weeks time to place on record an updated status report with regard to appointments.
>> Just file it. We've got >> May I only add that uh further appointments have been specifically made subject to my CAT proceedings.
>> The appointments have been made for the other category not for the contractual teachers. They have said for contractual 23 posts have been reserved.
>> Yes.
>> And 37 are regular posts. So these appointments are being made for regular candidates.
>> No that that all contractual post need to be regularized as per your lordship's order and when they are appointing people they have said it's subject to the orders of the cat and the appointment letters are a part of my petition. They have specifically referred to my petition before the cat.
>> They are all confusing themselves. Kat is dealing with contractual teachers. If they are appointing for regular post why should they say that it is subject to cat? Lord after my lord's order just tell us sir does it have any connection >> lord the the sense I'm trying >> 97 are different 23 are different >> there are >> you cannot take any claim for 97 you can if you participate in the examination now you say that the examination has been conducted contrary to the order of the court understood >> yes >> why did you appear I'm submitting that according to the order of 2017. Next state >> next is Himachal Pradesh.
>> Himachal Pradesh. Yes.
>> The affidavit what I have is 11th July 2025. I believe Lord have the same affidavit and it's a very slipshot affidavit I must say.
>> Who is for the state of Himachel?
>> Nag appears online. I appear for the state of Himachal in this case.
>> Yes. uh uh pillow 245 posts of special educators were created and we had already given a requisition to the Himatra Pradesh Chay and Aayog and the test the screening test has been conducted yesterday on 25th May and we are in the process of appointment within one and a half months we should be able to appoint the special educ regular special educators. The affidavit say that the T was conducted way back on 11th June 2025 >> submits that 245 post of special teachers have been created within bracket 138 for pre primary class 5 and 107 for class 6 to class 12 and that the recruitment process is in progress. In fact, the examination has been conducted yesterday.
The average that within a period of 6 weeks from date, the state would be in a position to make regular appointments.
>> I just we required the state of Uttar Pradesh to file an updated status report. Sorry Majal Pradesh Pradesh >> status report after the appointments in terms of the examination conducted yesterday are made >> just one more line for they have not specified how many contractuals and screening committee has screened how many people because these are contractual the data is there >> what is your instruction sir >> below we had constituted the screening committee screening committee has gone into the >> screening committee I screen.
>> Yes, that's what I was submitting.
>> Paraph 4 does just say screening committee form for home contracts of teachers not specified. So they have to specify the data >> in the updated status report to be filed in terms of the aforementioned direction. The state of Himachal Pradesh shall also indicate the number of contractual teachers screened by the screening committee which has been constituted with a notification dated 17th April 25 and how many of them have been found to be suitable for appointment.
>> Yes. Now the last Uttrack please Uttar Khan there is a detailed affidavit of 5th April 2026.
What they say is that there are 285 post created for secondary >> that was temporary >> outsourcing outsource outsource 285 >> 285 post created >> as a outsourced teacher for secondary classes and 380 they have a sanctioned post for primary teachers and out of that 285 what they say is they have taken 135 5 from that for secondary teachers >> as a sanction post with confusing myots may just repeat it 285 outsource teachers for secondary in par 7 >> why not I'll explain that 28 >> most confusing is outsourcing most >> 285 were the temporary post which were created back then after the judgment what happened there after milot in the ratio of 1 is to8 lord they have identified 135 regular post to be taken out of 135 132 has already been appointed three are left only >> where is that >> for for secondary level and then in the elementary out of 380 post >> that 132 is again not missing is not in the affidavit >> it's five total regular post >> please don't say anything which is not part of the >> you take the others by surprise >> it's 132 which is not mentioned however it is mentioned for the Kumu region 74 for the Garwal and four we have taken we have taken from out of those temporary post. So combining them lord it's 132 total regular post of 135 >> what they say is 45 >> which paragraph of your par six they say 45 have been selected.
So no f says 13.
>> We have an extra extra also plus 17 page 15. Lord >> page 15 >> Roman 6.
>> Yes.
28 similarly in accordance with the order passed this honorable court against the total 285 created post of special education teachers under the elementary education the process I'm sorry this is for elementary secondary secondary kindly see the lectures in lecture A1 and page we'll be show that from If you come from paragraph six that is six and seven please post what is the new concept you're introducing this is a teaching >> and this happened other also not also >> one intervening application is made force.
>> Certainly what I bow down.
>> This is demeaning for a special teacher.
I must say this is not a contractor outsourcing and all and I'll bring my 100 special educators.
It should this this should be one outsourcing of this.
>> Please adise your clients to try it.
>> But we'll find by state of according to which there are seven candidates are screening after screen 29 candidates are being screened. Seven are appointed and application regarding one of the candidates. Out of these seven files, >> you will indicate how many have been screened.
>> Tease me >> contractual teachers. How many screened?
How many?
>> How many process is on? How many have been appointed? How many remain to be appointed? And give the time to >> just state it off. We'll say my one as far as the supplied with the copy. If my not if my supply will supply >> this is himself this is >> Uttra >> Uttra give the IIA numbers issue notice Mr. Council act number 21639 please a copy to him so that he can respond.
>> You have filed an IIA.
>> Yes ma'am.
>> Give the number to the court master and give a copy to your landed friend.
>> Please ma'am the contempt is also there.
>> Forget about contempt. We are not going to enter any contempt.
My humble submission below. Kindly see the 20 contractual teachers have filed this intervention application below.
They are working for the last more than 11 years below on contractual basis.
They are having the RCA qualification and they are as per the judgment of the honorable court they are entitled to be regularized as per the seventh March judgment.
My humble my humble submission lord the we are the we have filed the 20 20 contractual out of 29 they they have not the screening committee have not considered >> deciding on what basis whether somebody is suitable or unsuitable rci >> rci and not the >> if they have rci qualification and if they have for 10 years.
>> Please, >> what is the reason for not regularizing this?
>> We'll file a better effective on this also. We'll file we'll file a reply also.
>> Yes.
I will just supply you know we are also seeking the same direction which have been issued to the state of Hana on the previous date of hearing. May I just >> you say that you have not if they have not qualified the test let them >> no no no that that is not the may I just read >> we are not going to give any direction right let the come we consider it and then pass direction >> your honor we have filed I regarding >> have you served it to them >> yes your honor >> my friend is for har no we are not on hana wait this is a UK Okay.
>> So you'll file it.
>> You will be we issue notice on the is >> please >> file your counter to all the >> Yes. Now Hana.
>> Yes. Your order.
>> In today's order there's no other state.
No.
>> There's no other state >> in previous order. Your honor.
>> Previous order. Tell us sir.
>> 12th May. That par number 24th May order. Your honor. It needs some direction and clarification. Your >> let us see >> uh par number 25 order of 12 of this honorable >> last one for last.
>> Yes. Which para 25 year old >> that's the second >> you submitted that 360 called for fractual special teachers are in position and there are 1093 section post or not the post for BJT postgrade graduate teacher that are under section they are not included in this these are both elementary teachers that's the PGP are not being considered they will not be considered under this order that's why >> yes it's not >> it is less so >> total >> where it's less so that they'll not be considered >> it's very central that there are so many post and all your all special teachers >> your honor 360 in spite of 360. It should have been 160.
>> Forget about it. 26 of Hana may invite all special teacher to appear before the screening committee on a specific. What is the figure in the 25?
>> Don't worry about the figure. You have said all the contractual teachers to be screened.
>> 360 are total 20 plus one is a difficulty.
>> This is submitted sir. This is the submission. We have not given any finding.
>> 26 is the order.
>> Uh 26 is our order. This is the submission.
>> But it is not here regarding which are supposed to be sanctioned.
>> It says consider all right.
>> That's fine.
>> If it's fine then why you going? No. The order may indicate the next next states next state for the next state. Just Telangana, Assam, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Bihar Delhi also Delhi Delhi Delhi we will put the date after looking into the order whatever Telangana Assam Rajasthan Chhattisgarh Bihar >> for Delhi we will see whatever directions have been given try today so that it can be on a table only one line clarification it was there >> it was not I I'll look it in the only one first week will Miscellaneous only one line end of July only one line for Delhi. It was my 2020 notification 21 appointment.
>> Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Please other other landed advocates may kindly make the courtroom.
Only the council appearing in item number one may be directly.
>> No sir, not now.
>> No sir, not now. Not now, ma'am.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











