BREAKING NEWS: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Holds Briefing Amid Reports Iran Deal Is Close

Añadido: 2026-05-28

[00:00:00]warm up for my Senate and House hearings next week. So, uh I don't want anyone yelling, "Reclaim my time." So, uh let's start out with Trump accounts. Uh Trump accounts, I believe, are the most important benefit for young people since the GI Bill. Today, the app is now available on all major platforms, bringing the president's vision directly to American homes. Nearly 6 million American children have been signed up for Trump accounts, which will launch on July 4th. And I would encourage all of you to go to trumpaccount.gov to sign up. Uh we had a historic tax filing season. We passed the largest tax cuts in American history. The average refund this filing season is nearly $3,300, an 11% increase from last year. And importantly, very importantly, 62 million returns, 44% claimed at least one of the president's signature tax cuts. No tax on tips, no tax on overtime. the reduced taxes on social security benefits. 85% of our seniors paid no taxes and the autodeductibility on loans for American cars. And to remind everyone, Democrats, every Democrat voted against those programs. Uh we've had sustained and resilient GDP growth.

[00:01:21]Real GDP has risen 2.6% over the past four quarters. Atlanta Fed's GDP now predicts 3.8% for this uh quarter, second quarter. Uh the US energy dominance uh part of our resilience stems from our energy dominance. Natural gas is down as my belief and the futures market is showing us. Oil will be lower than pre-conlict levels. We are more resilient to energy price fluctuations due to President Trump's energy dominance and deregulatory agenda. The United States is now the world's largest energy exporter. The United States has never exported so much energy or produced so much energy. Main Street Prosperity, the average 401k, is up almost $30,000 since President Trump's inauguration.

[00:02:10]President Trump RX has already saved Americans over $600 million. I'm sure all of you will want to report on that.

[00:02:17]And the unemployment rate remains low at 4.3%. So, uh, with that, I'm happy to ask questions. Uh, I will mention the three weeks ago, I got an honorary degree from the University of South Carolina. So, if you really want to get a question, you can call me Dr. Besson.

[00:02:35]>> So, [laughter] I want to start with these Trump accounts. you know, there's a lot of people, a lot of working-class Americans that maybe don't have the financial expertise when it comes to stock markets and investing in general. In what ways do you are you guys simplifying this for all those Americans so that it's not just for one class of people, but all Americans can can have it?

[00:03:01]>> Well, that's a great question because 38% of Americans have no exposure to equities. They don't share in the great innovation the machine that is uh the American economy or great capital markets is drives the our prosperity. So u if your child is born during President Trump's administration, Treasury puts in $1,000 as a seed investment. Uh we've also created six learning pods so you can go online to the app that went up today and learn. And I think that this is going to be I I've been a big proponent of financial literacy and I think this is going to be one of the greatest real time financial literacy educations in history because it won't be oh like there there's a street in New York called Wall Street. This is what I don't really understand what happens there. American family is going to be able to look on their phone every day and see and you know I think it's going to drive people to try to understand what they've got here. I I think we're going to create a generation of shareholders.

[00:04:10]>> Ed, >> thank you, Mr. Secretary. Um I guess first, well, we're starting to see the disruption of the oil supply through the straightforward moves affect economic data. Um you know, first, is there a deal on the table uh for a 60-day ceasefire to continue that? And then second, um how fast could inflation then recede or retreat or is inflation sticky because the PCE was uh at a three-year high? Uh well f first of all P PCE today month over month was 0.2 which was you know we're we're looking at decimal points but the estimate was.3 so one month doesn't a trend make and you what we've seen is actually oil prices are down about 10% in May there almost 2,000 ships waiting to come out of the Gulf and I think the oil market is going to be very well supplied on the other side of this and that we could see prices come down very quickly. We saw the UAE the leave OPEC. So I I would expect on the other side of this that gasoline prices will follow on the table.

[00:05:13]>> Sorry.

[00:05:14]>> Is there an agreement with Iran on the table?

[00:05:16]>> Uh the the teams have been going back and forth and President Trump has made it very clear. He talked about it at the cabinet meeting that he he has several red lines and Iran has to turn over their highlyenriched uranium. They cannot pursue a nuclear weapon and the straight of Hermouth back to your question on energy has to free transit navigation of the seas has to be free and open as it was before. So he's not going to take a bad deal. He's going to make a great deal for the American people.

[00:05:50]>> So Peter, >> Dr. question.

[00:05:53]>> Y >> um how long until we see your signature next to President Trump's face on a $250 bill?

[00:06:03]>> Well, the again as Treasury Secretary, I I have two mandates for US currency. At present, the no living person can be on US currency and the currency must stay in God we trust. So right now there is proposed legislation that in front of the House in front of the Senate to change the first requirement so that a living person Donald J. Trump could be on a $250 bill. So it it it's all in in the hands of the uh it's it's all in up on Capitol Hill. So at at Treasury, we prepare things in advance. So we have prepared in advance that if the legislation is passed but we will stick to the law.

[00:06:49]>> Something that came up something that came up yesterday also at the cabinet meeting. President Trump said Oman will behave just like everybody else for we will have to blow them up.

[00:06:59]>> Are you guys back there in the West Wing making plans for a new war with Oman?

[00:07:03]>> Uh again I think the president wanted to punctuate freedom of navigation in the straight. I had a call with the Omani ambassador this morning and he assured me that there were no plans for tolling the straight. As he said, our countries have had 200 years of good relations. He wants to have another 200 more. And you know, I told him that this was a non-starter and he did not want to risk either the Omani individuals or Omani financial institutions the getting sanctioned. Dr. >> Thank you, Mr. Secretary, is it in the US interest to wave some sanctions on Iran or to unfreeze some of their assets before Iran has made concrete um promises about getting rid of their nuclear program?

[00:07:52]>> Again, I I'm not going to preview the deal, but I I would think that the things would go very slowly the in terms of that. So, you know, we we'll see.

[00:08:05]Just to follow up on that because it's our understanding that the US has committed to discussing the matter of sanctions relief during this negotiation period. So just to be clear, is sanctions relief for Iran on the table?

[00:08:15]Uh again, it it is a multiaceted agreement and um nothing is going to be on the table until we see the straight of open and the Iranians agree that they they have to turn over the the highly enriched uranium and that they can't have a nuclear program and and and and to be clear here that this administration, President Trump has done something that no one other administration is able to do. We have gotten the Iranians to talk about their nuclear program and to perhaps commit to not having one. That has never happened before. It had been off the table. So I think you when you look at the results of the kinetic action of our economic pressure, it has worked to bring them to the table and have a discussion on this.

[00:09:04]>> Mr. Secretary, I I just want to follow up. You said that the teams have been going back and forth, but can you confirm whether or not a tentative agreement has been reached in these negotiations with Iran?

[00:09:16]>> Again, everything depends on what the president wants to do. And President Trump is not going to make a bad deal for the American people, for the the US, and he was very clear at the cabinet meeting on the uh yesterday what he wants.

[00:09:34]Mr. Secretary, Dr. Cara from Lindell TV. I'm sorry. Did I steal this question because I'm not that person?

[00:09:41]>> No, it's you.

[00:09:42]>> Okay. Thank you so much. [laughter] >> Thank you for taking my question. Cara from Lindell TV. I really wanted to get your thoughts on digital currency. A lot of our viewers are increasingly worried that digital currency could one day be used to track people's spending or limit personal freedom. What's your philosophy on that? And what safeguards is the Treasury and its administration putting in place to make sure a new digital payment system to protect Americans privacy and freedoms in the future?

[00:10:07]>> Well, so this administration has been very clear there will be no central bank digital currency which I think the is would be the first step toward tracking.

[00:10:16]So we have taken that off the table. We passed stable coin legislation with bipartisan and the clarity act is now up on the hill and I think it has bipartisan support and the most important thing we can do is to make digital assets come into the United States make the US the home our regulation our best practices are what will ensure good standards for these when you look at digital assets all the nonsense that happens all the things you read read about that's because it's the wild wild west offshore. So we got to bring it on shore. So I would encourage the house and the senate to get clarity done.

[00:10:56]>> Jack doc uh a lot of people talking about the IRS settlement and uh which has been rolled over now into this weaponization fund over at DOJ. wanted to get your comments on the decision process as much as you can tell how that settlement came to be, how it was rolled over to DOJ and then the process for uh how for those funds now as it's played out.

[00:11:24]>> Good. So, thank you. Thank you for the question. Uh this is going to be the only question I'll take on this matter today. So, there's ongoing litigation, so it'd be inappropriate for me to comment. Uh, President Trump is a great American who has endured more than 10 years 10 years of non-stop harassment and weaponization from the federal and state government actors. The a bad actor at the IRS leaked more than 400,000 tax returns, including the Trump family, all the employees, and that's how we got here. Now, no American should be targeted for political reasons, and every citizen deserves fair treatment and full protection of the law. the Department of Justice represented Treasury and the IRS in this matter and I'm gonna have to refer any questions to acting attorney general to Todd Blanch.

[00:12:12]So, >> yeah, thanks. So, uh President Trump has said that we can expect interest rates to come down very quickly a number of times that last week, but the market at the moment does broadly does not expect any rate cuts this year. You know, JP Morgan said this, Morgan Stanley and and so on. So who is right the president or the market?

[00:12:35]>> The well I I think again I I believe that we will get get through the that this challenging period now the on higher prices on the other side of this.

[00:12:47]I've said publicly that I think we'll be back to substantial disinflation. But most importantly I think we've got the worsh Fed now. It's a new day at the Fed. Uh the Treasury Secretary and the Fed chair uh have lunch or breakfast every week. I had my first breakfast with Chair Wars this morning and I believe that he will do the right thing to balance inflation and growth.

[00:13:11]>> Mr. Secretary, thank you. Secretary Bess, I hope you were calling on me.

[00:13:19]>> Yes. So, I I'd like uh to ask you if you could provide a little more detail on what you're doing to shut down Iran's airlines and also on sanctions relief.

[00:13:27]Uh a senior administration official briefed reporters over the weekend that sanctions relief will be commensurate with nuclear concessions, but at at some point if the enriched uranium is given up, should we expect pallets of cash to be flown to Iran? Could you describe how that looks?

[00:13:42]>> Well, a a couple of things on on the airlines. One one thing that we're not going to do is restrict movement for religious reasons. So Iranians who want to make the pilgrimage the uh to Mecca or Medina will be allowed. We will also allowed uh valid humanitarian reasons.

[00:14:00]But the the other thing we can do is that when these airlines fly they have to be refueled. They sell tickets. They pay landing fees. Anyone who accepts those we will sanction. So they should be very clear that these state-owned Iranian airlines, they are outlaws and cannot do this.

[00:14:19]>> Secretary Secretary, since you're the White House briefer today, I know you've been asked this already, but I'm wondering if you can just confirm on the record that there is a tenative deal that has been agreed for a 60-day extension of a ceasefire and then a continuation of nuclear talks. I again it's always a mistake to get out ahead of the president. So it is all going to be the president's decision. I think that we we can see that the president very clearly stated out stated his his three the open the street highly enriched uranium no nuclear program. So >> those things are those things part of the the temporary deal right now sir are those three aspects that you just outlined part of the temporary deal that has been agreed >> that if there can be no deal without those why would there be a deal without those >> Mr. Secretary thanks so much uh for taking the time uh President Trump at the cabinet meeting said he thought that reducing fraud would help to balance the budget. you put out the the goal of getting uh the deficit to 3% of GDP.

[00:15:31]What's your timeline for achieving that and how do you think the what can you say to make the markets given where rates are like kind of process kind of what your plan and agenda is?

[00:15:41]>> Well, the the GAO numbers, not my numbers, believe that there's about 500 billion a year of fraud. So, uh could we very quickly get 250 billion billion of that? The budget deficit is approximately 1.8 8 trillion.

[00:15:57]So that would reduce the the deficit substantially. If we could get that 500 billion number, you know, I think it would engender confidence. You'd probably also go into a virtu virtuous cycle as the budget deficit narrowed.

[00:16:11]Interest rates would go down. Uh no one reports it, but last year we actually had a fiscal contraction. Just to remind everyone, we inherited the worst budget deficit in history in history when we were not in a recession or not at war.

[00:16:27]6.7%.

[00:16:29]We brought that down to about 5.5 or 5.4% this year. I think we'd stay on a good trajectory. [laughter] Secretary, >> Mr. Secretary, um without an executive order, does the US government have adequate defenses in place to address the risk created by anthropics new AI models.

[00:16:49]>> Uh we we have great collaboration between all all of the labs that have the large language models but between the US government via and the labs. So >> thank you Mr. Secret is me. Okay. Thank you Mr. Secretary. Appreciate it. Um >> first did you speak with the president uh before this briefing? Did he show any willingness to this 60-day uh ceasefire extension? I >> I haven't seen the president today. And then I just want to follow up. When can Americans, the average American, and can the US economy work for the average American without a deal with Iran?

[00:17:24]>> Uh again, I I believe we've already seen uh oil prices come down uh substantially. Uh we are pumping more oil than we've ever seen before. And I, as I said, these are short-term challenges that we will get over and I think we'll move forward.

[00:17:44]So, Mr. Secretary, just to follow up.

[00:17:47]>> No, no, in the White House.

[00:17:48]>> Oh, thank you, Mr. Secretary. Appreciate it. Um, given how much this upcoming midterm election will hinge on the economy, what did you think about President Trump's comments in the cabinet meeting yesterday, saying he didn't care about the midterms?

[00:18:02]>> So, you're calling President Trump a statesman.

[00:18:05]you're you're you're saying that he is taking a statesmanlike position that he has a a a [clears throat] core belief and he he believes that the most important thing is for Iran never to have a nuclear weapon. So I I believe uh both things can be true that we can do well in the midterms that we you know perhaps have the makings of a deal here and I believe that and look the economy that it it is challenging now uh but un unemployment is still low uh tax refunds were high and consumer spending is still quite high. So, in in my private business over the years, I always looked at what were consumers doing, not what they were saying. And I'm in constant contact with the banks, and every income quintile is is still doing well.

[00:19:03]>> Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

[00:19:04]>> Thank you, Mr. Secretary. On the $250 on the $250 bill, Mr. Secretary, uh you said the legalities of it are up on Capitol Hill, but I just wonder what your opinion is personally. Do you think it's a good idea for the president to put his face on America?

[00:19:18]>> Again, the president doesn't do it. The House and the Senate have to do it.

[00:19:22]>> Secretary, >> right?

[00:19:27]>> Yeah. Secretary Bessa, what are the remaining assurances that President Trump needs to see in order for him to sign off on the agreement with Iran?

[00:19:37]>> I I I I I don't think it could be clear.

[00:19:41]Yes.

[00:19:43]Um you um you're um you're following in the footsteps at the podium there of um Secretary Rubio and Vice President Vance. There's been quite a lot of talk about their presial ambitions. Uh does your presence here today indicate that we might see you running in 2020?

[00:19:57]>> No, I I I think it just means they've run out of things on the food chain.

[00:20:04]>> There has been some back and forth over the last several days and also with the US attacking Iranian drones yesterday.

[00:20:11]This morning, Sentcom put out a statement that Iran had launched this ballistic missile towards Kuwait, calling it an egregious ceasefire violation. How can the administration still argue that a ceasefire is in effect? Uh again, uh wi with the Iran with the Iranian government, we did not have regime change, but we changed the regime. As President Trump said at the cabinet meeting, as we've said other times, the the first layer of leadership is the was eliminated, the second layer, and we are now at the third layer. And the way to think about it is the Iranian government such as it is the is three pillars. It is the elected government, it is the IRGC, and it is the clerics.

[00:20:53]And they are having trouble communicating. So, uh we are uh being patient. uh we do not have unlimited patience. President Trump always prefers a peace deal. So everything we have done thus far has been defensive and at present that is what we will continue doing. But if President Trump doesn't think he can get a peace deal then Connecticut is back.

[00:21:19]>> Thank you Mr. Secretary. Uh are you hopeful that the oil prices will go down once this conflict is over given the fact that this trade will remain closed and uh by the time this oil gets to the mayor markets could be two or three months.

[00:21:33]>> Uh again the uh you know we we see that the market I believe is very well supplied right now. The market seems to be going into balance the for itself. So I think that as the straight opens up we're going to see this burst of ships come out. So you we we may actually see how quickly can it be refined, how quickly can it gets to get to its destination.

[00:21:59]>> Thank you so much from the Daily Mail.

[00:22:01]You wrote resilience on your cabinet note meetings. Several times the photographer zoomed into it. Are you trying to keep the president calm? Are you trying to keep yourself calm? Why did you write all those notes?

[00:22:12]>> So people could look over my shoulder, photograph them, and think they got a scoop. [laughter] Is the United States considering a reconstruction program for Iran if a deal is signed?

[00:22:25]>> Uh again, I I think we we got to get to the deal before we get to the other side before we get to the [laughter] you in the pink.

[00:22:34]>> Mr. Secretary in the red.

[00:22:36]>> No, in the pink.

[00:22:37]>> In the pink. Thank you. Christina [clears throat] with the Leundo Network. Mr. Secretary, uh, how effective do you believe the current Treasury restrictions have been in pressuring the Cuban government? And also, if you're in the room when those talks are being held, are there any plans to either tighten the the sanctions or to ease the sanctions against the Cuban government to get some type of change?

[00:22:59]>> Again, that's going to be up to that's going to be up to the Cuban government that they can go up, they can go down.

[00:23:05]that we've tried to get humanitarian aid in and the the regime rejected it. So because they they wanted to go through their corrupt system. So I um they could go up, they could go down.

[00:23:20]Karen Sticks, Secretary Rubio doing a fantastic job of managing this process and we we at Treasury are working with him in the red.

[00:23:32]>> Thank you. Uh Reagan Ree with the Daily Caller. I want to ask you about Antifa.

[00:23:36]Uh, in October, the Treasury Department started working with the FBI to investigate who's funding Antifa. Can you give us an update on that investigation? How close are you guys to finding out who's funding it? Uh, >> it it it is ongoing. We made substantial progress and I think in the weeks and months ahead, we are going to have a lot to report. Uh, one thing that did go the under reportported that I would point out to all of you is the IRS is now giving guidance on the form 990 which nonprofits they have to file and we are going to encourage or demand that nonprofits know their grant recipients.

[00:24:17]So if a grant recipient is violent the if they are suppressing people's rights then you are responsible for that and I think that's a very good first step.

[00:24:30]>> Question there's new government data that shows that Americans are now saving a smaller share of their incomes than at any time over the past four years. Are you seeing signs that American households are dipping into their savings to pay for the higher costs of things like gas and groceries? And does data like that concern you right now?

[00:24:49]>> Well, so a lower lower academic literature would tell you lower savings rate can mean one of two things. uh the the kind of the doomer view that you took or that people have more confidence or it it could be you know something else because you know for instance uh stock market gains or 401k gains might not show up in savings so they're looking at that think that they can draw down their household savings >> um you're obviously concerned about the risks posed by advanced AI models like Bethos to critical infrastructure the financial sector is concerned as well.

[00:25:26]What types of what types of changes are being considered to the AI executive order so it could pass? And do you believe that an AI executive order needs to include the preublic access for government?

[00:25:38]>> Uh again, we're working very closely the with the large language uh labs. They've been excellent partners and we are going to get a solution that solves for the maximum calculus. What we want to do uh the US is the AI leader in the world.

[00:25:56]We're an AI superpower. China is second.

[00:25:58]They are trailing substantially. We want to make sure that we keep that lead. So we are working on the exact calculus between innovation and safety and we want to optimize for that.

[00:26:13]>> So you you in the glasses >> in the glasses.

[00:26:20]No. No. You don't have glasses on. You You want the glasses?

[00:26:24]>> Thank you for taking my question. Um there was a report this morning that uh Justice Alo's son is working in your department. Can you confirm that that's the case? And if so, do you believe that that means that he should be uh that the justice should recuse himself from cases that involve your department?

[00:26:40]>> Uh I I I am sure that Mr. Alo follows all legal and ethical guidelines and I can assure you that at Treasury we follow all the legal and ethical guidelines.

[00:26:51]Thank you, Mr. Secretary. I have two questions for you, but just to follow what you said about the >> Well, you didn't call me doctor, so I only got one.

[00:26:57]>> Well, I'll shoot for two. Uh, you said that it's up to Congress. The president's face is on a $250 bill, but it is actually the Washington Post that's reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to to do that. Do you think politically it's a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas? No, I I don't really understand this Washington Post article that who who hears from the Post. Yep. Terribly written, terribly edited because basically what what it says is that Treas Treasury is following the law and that we've created the bill and that it's up to Congress, but that we follow the bill and it's up to I didn't really understand what the story was.

[00:27:38]>> Anyway, aren't involved in that? Two of your political appointees.

[00:27:41]>> Yeah, of course. But we we prepare for everything if it gets passed ju just like we we were ready 6 months in advance for the one big beautiful bill for tax guidance that so we have to prepare in advance. You you you can't draw something up the day before >> politically. Do you think it's a good idea though when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?

[00:28:00]>> Look, I think it has I I think that it's bifurcated that Do you think we should have a 250th anniversary celebration? Well, that's happening anyway, but putting the president in a $2 million bill, but Kaitlin, it's not happening anyway. It's happening because it's being funded the by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country.

[00:28:23]And I I don't think that the there's anything unourred about having the president of the United States that the person who was president of the United States on the 250th anniversary fell Secretary Russia what you just commented on there Mr. Secretary about the $1.8 $20 billion fund. Is it accurate that the general counsel of the Treasury Department resigned over that?

[00:28:52]>> I will not be taking any other questions. I mean, I will not be taking any other questions.

[00:28:56]>> You know, Wall Street, sir, given the scale of the assault from Russia on Kee in recent days and the fact that diplomacy seems to have settled down, there is no diplomatic talks happening right now between Russia, Ukraine or the US. What about sanctions? Is the US considering sanctions on Russia at this time? Well, the the the US this administration has put the the hardest sanctions on Russia of any country. So So let's let's review le let's review what how the sanctions regime has gone since the Russian action the on Ukraine. Uh Biden administration put on very the what what I would call mild mild sanctions because they were worried about gasoline prices going up into an election. It would be the uh an unstatesman-like sanctions that probably the worst national security adviser in the history of the country, Jake Sullivan, in an act of bravery on his way out the door in January, they raised the sanction level they on behalf of the Trump administration. that we let those in situ. They when we took office, they have fast forward to October and President Trump instructed me to sanction the two largest Russian oil companies, Luke Oil and Rossnap, which we did. No other government has done that. So, no one has done more sanctions than the Trump administration on Russian oil.

[00:30:31]Yeah. Yeah. No.

[00:30:34]No. So, yeah. No, no, no.

[00:30:38]>> No. Here. Here. Who wants to own this gray hair? No. Gray hair. No, you don't have gray hair. [laughter] >> Oh, may maybe you do.

[00:30:49]>> Thank you, Mr. Secretary. When you had breakfast this morning with Fed Chair, uh did you request that the Fed lower interest rates? I I had breakfast with Chair Pal 41 times and I never did that.

[00:31:04]So, okay. La last question.

[00:31:08]>> Thanks, sir. Governor Gavin Newsome has floated this idea of a 100% state tax on Californians who receive money from President uh Trump's anti-weaponization fund. Your response to the governor's call for 100%.

[00:31:20]>> Uh there's no cure for stupid, >> Mr. Okay.