Habeas corpus is a fundamental constitutional right that cannot be suspended except in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety may require it, as stated in Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution; this right ensures that individuals unlawfully arrested must be brought before a court immediately and released if due process cannot be proven, and it applies to any deprivation of rights, not just incarceration.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Monday Night Law 05-11-2026Added:
law here on May 11th, 2026.
Good times.
At least I think.
Come on.
There we go.
Move that over.
All right. All right. Sorry for the delay tonight. Brother having issues with his brakes on his car truck. Looks like he's going to have to replace both calipers, brake calipers on the front.
So, yeah, just got off the phone with him and here I am.
And here you are. Uh, let's see. We do shout out over here to Telegram.
Uh Regina, Michael Casper, Diesel D's, good to see you, brothers. Wendy, Prayer Warrior, good to see you, too. JPC5, Paint Gun, Spooty, Ralph K, good to see you. Paladrome, good to see you.
Jeffrey, Al Alvi, and Derek, and anybody else that's not on the live here that might be in the uh comment section over there.
Kathy Watson, you see a deer?
I had a pretty darn good camping trip, folks.
It It was nice up there. It was really quiet.
Hardly anybody up there at all and nobody in the little valley that we were in. No, nobody else camping up there.
There were some people camping up top, but uh there were workers who were working on remodeling a couple of the cap campgrounds down in there.
But as for people camping camping, nobody. Just me and my brother.
Uh, all caps false prophet out here on Rumble. Good to see you, Jacqueline.
Good to see you, dear. Missed you last week. Or yeah, I did do Monday night last week, but you weren't here.
So, hope you were doing okay.
Um, Regina, can you see me now?
All right.
And nobody's commented out here on Facebook or X.
Amunzen 58. Good to see you.
Uh thoughts on Express Trust. Well, that's kind of a broad topic, but uh uh Greg Duck, good to see you, brother.
Canadian. Okay, thank you Wendy for for checking out there, making your rounds. Appreciate it.
That's a whole that's a whole like educational show in itself on on trusts.
But uh yeah, let's see who what else we got.
Let's Let's see.
We only got Let me see if I can get this over here to then I'll pull it up. So, I got picture on my phone here.
Um, no. You want to go here?
There they are. Now let's share that over there.
Now I can pull it from there to from uh So there's the I don't know there's there's a 100 plus morelss there. Now this our first year finding uh the white ones our little honey spot.
uh either we were a little early due to due to weather um and and we you know we also went up early, right? Typically we go up the end of May or third week of May uh around the 20th, the week before Memorial weekend before everybody else goes up for camping.
But, uh, you know, we heard that the Morels's were popping and, uh, we wanted to get up there early and get them while they're popping. Well, we got up there and, um, well, they were pretty scarce.
We went up Tuesday morning and, uh, we went scouting around and, man, they were just really scarce. A couple of them had popped some a couple different places, but we only found like a dozen or so the first day.
And we hit, you know, we hit our three three main spots.
And uh yeah, our little honey spot, man, we only found like six or seven there, which is usually, you know, a gold mine.
But, uh, we ended up going back to the honey spot on, um, Thursday and it was the the last spot. And that's the other thing, too, is like pretty much every trail that we usually go on, there were trees down everywhere. even on the main road.
They had just barely uh just barely got uh one of the trees that was across the main road getting up to camping.
Um my brother's cousin uh was up there in that area morell hunting and said that he couldn't get couldn't get through because there was a tree still across the main road.
Uh, but they did get up to one one spot there where the snow was at and had had the kids there and had a snowball fight.
So, they had a good time there, but uh didn't find a whole lot of mushrooms probably because they couldn't get all the way in there. But, uh, yeah. Oh, man.
There was one kind of like a quad dirt bike trail and uh we had cleared three trees and then hit the fourth one and when we got to the fourth one just right past that there was a fifth one and it was a really big tree like two foot around big huge tree. There's no way that we're dragging that sucker or gonna go over it or under it in certain cases.
Uh so we just like, you know what, we've already cleared three. We could we could easily clear this one right here. It was a real small one, you know, 6 8 inch round, but just I mean we could literally see the the next tree. My brother actually walked up there and he's like, "No way, dude. There's no way to go under it cuz it's too low."
and uh it's too big to try and uh maneuver around and to go over.
So, a lot of trees a lot of trees were down this year, which is pretty crazy.
But uh yeah, we saw on the main road there were I don't know at least three trees uh where they had literally just cleared them probably within a day or two of us going up there or even that that morning possibly. uh looked like completely fresh, you know, sawdust, but like I said, we actually went up early. So, um about two two weeks, two and a half weeks early, but um we made it.
No, uh no real good riding because the trails were all messed up.
full of trees, but still had a really good time. Super quiet. Nobody else up there.
Uh not too chilly at night. I think it got down the the lowest it got down. The one night was what was it? 40 43. I think it was 43 degrees. The the one night was the coldest night.
And uh it only got up to about what was it Wednesday? I think we hit a high of like 70 or 71.
So other than that, really cool days.
Sunny, but cool. Had a little bit of a windstorm come through uh Wednesday, Wednesday evening there. The wind picked up pretty good.
mostly really high wind was up in the higher trees and stuff. Wasn't down through the camp, which was nice.
Mark Bond, good to see you, brother.
And you were with your mom last week.
Okay, Jacqueline.
That's that's excusable. At least it wasn't uh you being under the weather or something like that.
And of course, shout out to all the mothers out there for Mother's Day yesterday. Had a nice get together at my mom's house there with sister and brother-in-law and mom and her boyfriend.
We had a barbecued up some ribs and had some good food and good time.
Other than that, unpackings. I still haven't even put everything away from camping. I got piled in in the garage.
Haven't really fully put everything back away yet.
But yeah, good times.
Just me and my brother up there enjoying the the silence.
Except for the frogs.
Uh, we did hear one owl.
Uh, some grouse.
Uh, what else? What else was it? Uh, there's some ravens. Um, that was about it.
But a good good time.
I think we saw about five cars total come through the around the bend there where we camp during the day hunting morels's uh through the whole four days we were there.
So yeah, good freaking time.
So there you go, Ralph. There's uh I don't know, we somewhere around 120 morelss there. Oh yeah, on the honey spot. We went back to the honey spot on Thursday and then then we found a few and I had said, "Okay, I'm done. I'm headed back to camp." My brother decided to go up the road a little bit there and just kind of eyeball things and he found a spot he thought was going to be a good spot and it was really steep off off the edge there just cuz down inside this ravine and he got into all them white mushrooms there.
So, and it's crazy because we were just talking about them Wednesday night, how you know, he had a friend of his that uh uh took him up hunting one time and they found some white mushrooms and that was his first time ever seeing them. And he was like, "Yeah, he's never found them on his own, you know." And we were, that was Wednesday night we were talking about, I was like, "Oh, yeah. I've never seen those."
And uh yeah, he came back with all those white mushrooms cuz we were actually thinking about staying another day because they were really starting to starting to pop. So in that area that we were in. So we were like, "Okay, well if we don't, you know, maybe we'll stay another day." We had plenty of food.
But uh yeah. Um, he found all those. He was satisfied.
Put us over the 100 100 mushroom mark and it was a good time.
No extreme cold or extreme hot. No major weather.
Just a flatout good time.
Oh, good to see you, James out there in uh YouTube and uh Genevieve. Jennifer, no. No. Uh Wendy, we didn't go where the salmon migrate. No, we were straight up in the mountains up by a a reservoir.
And uh just little creek running through there.
Um I think uh right there at where we were camped was uh we looked it was like right at 4,800 ft elevation at the campsite.
Um then going back up the mountain or going down and then back up cuz again we were down inside of a ravine.
And uh we rode around to see if we could get up and over to the other side.
And uh nope. Still snow on the main road.
Right, Mark. Absolutely. Be very careful with these mushrooms, especially with the morelss. Well, any mushroom really.
Uh, but there's fake morelss, which we actually ran into a few of those up there.
They they look like morelss, but they're poisonous.
So, uh, like Mark says, if you don't know your mushrooms, don't eat them unless you want to lose your liver or or literally poison yourself and die there.
Uh, Christine Grace's YouTube, good to see you. Thank you.
Hey, Doug. How you doing, brother?
Yeah. Uh, Amanza, we we we actually eat our own mushrooms and uh my brother gives gives some to his cousin and uh his his mom really likes them. I know they're they're a delicatessan, let me tell you. 20 bucks a pound this year, huh?
But uh yeah, good good time.
Glad to have been able to get away for 4 days straight. Get away from all the 5G and all that.
Yeah. Yeah. Uh the poisonous mushrooms, that's a that's bad stuff.
My brother actually got himself a book on them. Actually, he's got two different books on mushrooms, so he's really studied up. I don't I just go for the fun of it because my brother likes to go and it gets me exercise and I get to hang out with my brother.
Although I do like mushrooms. So sauteed, whatever.
More specifically like the porttoellas and that kind of stuff. But mushrooms themselves are to me are okay. And and not the not the funny ones.
Oh, absolutely good on steaks, y'all.
Yeah. Yeah, we do have a lot of steel head here and salmon.
There's definitely good fishing in Idaho, but we're all out. So stay where you're at. Don't come here.
What are you saying there, James? $1 million from time of fake currency is Huh?
You must have hit enter before you meant to send that rag all out. Stay where you are.
So, a million dollars is only worth 37,500.
Is that what you're saying? Of the fake currency.
Wow.
Well, we'll we'll see.
So, uh I want to You've never fished, Jacqueline.
You poor depraved woman.
I have this uh video here I want to share. It's uh Michael Jacob and uh let me see make sure 2751. So, right here he's going to talk about how uh is it David Clemens or something like that? A different guy.
Uh Uh, Peachin Casma. Um, you'll have to forgive me on that one. I'm just going to call you Peach. Uh, why why don't we just go back to bartering? Uh, spread out flyers and tell people, "Hey, we trading now instead of using fiat." Uh, you know, absolutely. Um, in fact, there's there's a few people here in Idaho that are talking about this kind of stuff. um bartering and trading amongst ourselves.
So um that idea is most definitely floating around quite a bit. So well come on out here Jacquine and we'll take you fishing.
Take you up into the mountains here in Idaho and you'll never want to go back.
lot of freedom.
All right, let's take a listen here real quick.
Let's make hopefully everybody can hear the audio.
>> Bonds everywhere. Bond this, bond that, everywhere. Bond, you know. So, uh, the judicial protecting that the judicial across America is corrupt, right? So, uh, David Clemens, you know, law professor, won all kind of awards and then he went and talked to President Trump, uh, had dinner with him and a bunch of other people. Uh, and then a week later, they basically fire him because he talked to Trump and he started talking, uh, all the all the good stuff. But before that, he was like he was like great off professor, so good that they gave him a war. So this is the lawfare that's that's happening against a lot of us. Of course, President Trump went through incredible levels of lawfare. Uh David Clemens did as well, but he was able to uh you know shuck a job out of it. So he he says the judicial must be handled. This is what what he briefed President Trump. And uh so he says basically it's all corrupt. And and so he's he's like, you know, sharing with us about what Trump was like nodding his head, being quiet. And then when he said, uh, they're all corrupt. All the jud the judicials, all of us corrupt.
And he said, all of it like that. And so he asked that question like that. So of course, David Clement is a very intelligent guy, but he said that President Trump's like on another level.
So, uh, pretty cool. So he said, "Um, military tribunals, guys." So David Clement is like, "We're heading towards military tribunals." And, uh, I've told you guys, uh, that they're coming. Now, some of you don't will believe it when you see it. That's that's fine. Uh, because you've we've heard it a lot a lot of different times. Uh, but I just heard it from someone uh that they are heading down to do the uh uh military tribunals in Guantanamo. All right. Uh, so that's that's coming. Uh, and didn't say exactly when, but I got the impression it was within the next few weeks. All right. So, there's other people that are here that are saying, and I I put this out, there's 600 JAG officers, military, um, judge, advocate, general, so military lawyers that are being, uh, called up 600. So, one guy that has that was here uh at this event said he's pretty pretty significant guy and he's running for office uh here and I might have him on as well. Uh I'm not sure what his but he stood up at at the end and talking about how his lawyer who's a gun lawyer. Uh he there's people here in Nevada that had their election stolen.
So, they're uh you know going forward with cases and they're going >> Okay, so back up just a second. There is the the fact that the whole how how many how many times have I said this over the years that the whole entire judicial branch is corrupt. In fact, it's the whole legislative executive judicial the whole thing is corrupt. But uh you know nobody's talking about why or how it's corrupt, but the fact is is what did he just say?
600 600 plus JAG officers are being deployed basically to Gitmo for military tribunals and I I doubt it's just GMO. Okay.
Well, the again uh busy be buzzing. It's the entire system. the whole thing.
And I know that my my followers that have been following me for years have heard me say this many times. The whole system is corrupt. The entire thing from the legislative, executive, judicial, the whole it's no longer in our republican form of government. It it it appears to be a legislative, executive, and judicial, but it's not. the whole Reconstruction Acts of 1871 and throughout the years have slowly gotten rid of our our our common law grand juries, our common law courts, and then they altered the fundamental law from the common law to Roman civil law, the code. Right? This is all Roman civil law. It is not common law.
This isn't administrative. This isn't Admiral T. Maritime. This is Roman civil law, the code.
Okay, let's get it right. Let's say it right and call it out for what it is.
It's right in the Declaration of Independence subjecting us to a jurisdiction that is foreign to our Constitution and unagnowledged by our law and giving his ascent to their pretended acts of legislation.
It's the same thing again.
It's the Roman civil law. The code United States code of federal regulations uniform commercial code Idaho code is Roman civil law.
There's no beating around the bush here.
That's what it is. And it's a foreign jurisdiction.
And uh for those of you who've been following me for quite some time, this isn't the first time you've heard this.
This has happened over and over and over and over and over and over and over again throughout history. It's the same damn thing, the Roman civil law.
Okay. So that's the real problem. At the root is Roman civil law. They've altered the fundamental law. Then you get into the Administrative Procedures Act, right? 1946 there. That's when they started basically they stripped the legislature of their powers and transferred it over to the executive where this rule making happens and by the executive agencies which are all corporations cuz that's how a monarchy works.
Monarchy uses corporations or companies which are really that's a military term a company of men military right back to Montescu and his spirit of laws that a monarchy's known uh rule is warfare to conquer so that's what they've done all throughout history even before Jesus's time. Okay, this is it. It's ancient. It just that's just the way it's been. That's the way they are.
So, that's the reality. That's the truth.
But here they're, you know, somebody who's got a little more clout than I have cuz he had awards and he's a member of the bar and all that good stuff.
um tells Trump that the judicial branch is corrupt and Trump says the whole thing.
Yes.
They do not follow due process of law from the common law.
Period.
But there's there's the problem we have today is nobody knows the real law.
Nobody, right?
Sweet. Uh good, good, good for you, Mark. You know, we need to start having conversations with these kinds of people, talking to a lawyer and a cop Saturday, uh about what they think is law, and they were listening. Well, good, right, Jacqueline? Trump is uh playing stupid. Yeah, Trump already knows the entire system is corrupt. That's why he went through what he did to expose it to everybody else that the entire system is corrupt and it's all orchestrated and perpetrated by members of the bar. It's all controlled by them and that's why they oh unauthorized practice of law blah blah blah because you're you're you're you're not a member of the bar and it's like um the the law is supposed to be written in plain English so that the average man can read it and comprehend it.
What what do you mean unauthorized practice of law? Unauthorized by who?
And what law are you talking about?
So, back to Michael Jacob here. You know, this video talks about quite a few different things about like the bonds and stuff. Kind of some of the stuff that we were talking about in uh with the the toll and roll stuff. Okay.
So, it's amazing how the stuff that Tollen Roll has been doing and working on for a couple of years now that it's coming to fruition along with these uh you know speaking on these um fraudulent deeds, warranty deeds and all this stuff, members of the bar, real estate agents and all that good stuff. So, um, I'll share that link out there for this particular video for anybody who wants to go back and watch it. But we're I'm going to play a little bit more of this video here. The main part I wanted people to hear is that, okay, within a couple of weeks here, this is what it seems like.
And there's there's hundreds of thousands of indictments.
So, uh, based on, uh, my source and my understanding of what's going on without flat out being told really much of anything, I'm just having to basically read between the lines.
But the fact is is uh, been out of communication for what, a year plus now.
uh little highs here and there, making sure that you're okay.
Um that you're still alive, but knowing that you can't really talk to me right now.
That shit's been going down, folks.
They've been out there making arrests like crazy over the last year.
Right, Wendy? Yeah, I know.
This this is part of the problem. You know, those that are good little slaves don't experience the corruption of the courts, right? you know, they have a a good enough job to where they make enough money to pay all their bills and taxes and they're good little slaves and they, you know, they pay every little tax and every everything here and then they still have enough money for all their toys and fun, they're okay. But those of us that struggle and and have experienced the corruption, the corrupt courts, especially like family courts, but it it's all of it.
The whole thing. The whole thing. It isn't just family courts. It isn't just the criminal courts. It's the whole system. All of it. Every last bit of it.
None of it follows due process of law.
So, uh, they they they don't think there's anything wrong. They wouldn't do that. They wouldn't they wouldn't violate our rights. they wouldn't, you know, they don't know.
So, you know, there's like half of the population right there that don't think anything is wrong.
Oh, well, sucks to be him that he doesn't uh believe in what I'm teaching.
I show the letter of the law on the screen.
This is not my opinion. These are facts of law, history of law.
And as of late, all be darn Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Idaho in 2019 in State versus Clark citing exactly the stuff I've been teaching from.
Blackstone's commentaries on laws of England, New York State Rifle Pistol Association versus Brewing case. Number one source they go to, Blackstone's commentaries on the law of England. Why?
Why?
Now, if it's if it's the number one primary source of of law to site from both from my state Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States of America, I think I'm good. And you all better listen because I don't know of anybody else out there that even talks about Blackstone's commentaries on the laws of England, let alone Oh, what' I do? Oh, they're down here. I had to move them.
And And a shout out to Jacqueline for these.
Let let alone who actually Oh, yeah. I suppose you should change the screen here, right? Let let alone has all all all four volumes of Blackstone's commentaries on laws of England. And and clearly I I I do I do some reading cuz reading means reading.
So again, shout out to Jacqueline out there for those books. I I very much appreciate it. Love you, dear.
Yeah. Well, Well, that's good, Mark. That uh Washington state has no more mandatory bar members only.
Interesting.
All right, let's uh go back to the Michael Jacob because there's some more good info here. There's a lot of good info in this video, but they're going to do their cases again or or you know, run again. But this particular gentleman said his lawyer got called up cuz she's like, you know, um reservist uh for the military jag officer. She got called up. So um it's happening. It's happening. They're getting ready to do it. So I'm just going to give you a little bit of what uh David Clemens put out and I was like, "Dang, dude. you're you're like this guy is like stunned with information. I'm telling you, unbelievable. So, he talked about uh how the mil so the judicial is completely corrupt.
There's nothing we can do. Uh you know, every time we come out, you know, uh we need uh this this taken care of 2020 election fraud, you know, whatever it is, uh we get stalled out and they come up with some other thing. Oh, no. No.
And of course, you know, we have uh Pam Bondi, who was basically uh Trinis Evans uh was talking Trinis, awesome guy, January 6 guy. Uh and he he turned selfawer, right? So he works for a firm now. Uh and they're crushing it everywhere. He says Trump needs to go full Lincoln. Now full Lincoln means um they suspend rid of habius corpus.
basically us what President Lincoln did and because we're at war now. We know that we're at war, right? Uh the judicial corrupt. Uh we got corrupt officials everywhere. We have uh bonds that are about ready to, you know, implode America. Uh so basically, we're going to come in and start doing military tribunals, right?
And uh Pam Bondi uh Trinis Evans is pretty funny. He says, "Pam Bondi is Bill Bar and a wig." So, oh my god, I was I cracked up on that one. So, uh, the senior executive service basically runs the FBI, the CIA, uh, Wanda has talked about them quite a bit. Uh, they're basically non-elected.
They're in the background. They're running the show. Uh, they're going to probably, uh, go to Guantanamo, all of them. All right. Now, uh David Clemens talked about how there was at one time, I guess it was during the civil war, uh when uh habius corpus was um suspended and there was I forget the case he was talking about, uh it was one um one um uh military tribunal, just one, but under that military tribunal uh they did 390 people and all of them were convicted within three weeks. Within three weeks now, we know, yeah, >> it's a if we had John Brennan, you know, go through this corrupt legal system because, uh, uh, David Clinton's talking about that. He said he did something similar that took seven years. We don't have that time. All right. uh you know couple weeks, week or two, what you know one or two, three weeks, whatever. Now David Clemens said that uh the Save Act will not pass, right? Uh the reason why is because that would they would have they would be put out of office uh by the Save Act. Uh the congressmen uh because a lot of them probably are going to go Guantanamo, right? Uh and so they they're going to have to resist all all the way to the end. Now, article two, uh President Trump has talked about article two of the constitution several times. He's like, "Article two, I can do whatever I want.
He's he's commander-in-chief and we're under basically >> see Trump knows >> uh >> continuity of governance." So, we're under continuity of governance right now. And this is what the professor is talking about, Dave Clemens. And he says that uh these JAG officers will take on a lot of these people that are and there's he said there's not not a few hundred, not thousands, hundreds of thousands of people that are going to face military justice.
>> Yes. And I'm not I'm thinking it might be millions actually, but uh I guess maybe he's being conservative because he want to blow it up too much. But I don't know, maybe when it comes on the show, uh maybe we go deeper into that. But he said there will be plea deals within the um before it goes into military tribunal. There still will be uh in this ad hoc and new whatever um civilian uh judicial system that's going to be put together uh when the other ones is basically taken down, right? Uh and a lot of those people will be arrested for having done uh felonies and all kind of crazy stuff, too.
uh these judge these judges are going to they're going to pay right especially the J6 judges. All right. So um they're going to get what they gave out and then some way more.
So they will get the option he said of criminal tri criminal uh um plea deals plea deals. So it could be you know up to like 20 years. uh you can plea for we're gonna like just like they did with J most of the J6ers. Uh they're like they ain't you have no option. It's like you're gonna lose because you're in uh you know the DC district and District of Columbia which is completely corrupt and uh all the people here are leftists that are going to be they're not jury of your peers. They're leftist. I saw the I saw the the jury. I saw one of the trials.
Um and I I couldn't believe they looked like average people. They were like stu crazy stupid. Uh you know, we had we had the grandmother uh that you know had Cindy uh that had grandma Cindy basically. She had done nothing. She was just there. She just wandered the cap and then asked some of the guards like how do I get out of here? I don't think I should be in here. And they're like, you know, trying to point her into a place where she get more trouble, but eventually uh she went out on her own.
Uh and they they convicted her to like several years or something in prison and the day that she was supposed to go prisoner Trump did the pardon. Wow. Wow.
Unbelievable. But uh I mean I I saw that trial. I was like, "These people are hept. These are not uh a jury of her peers. she should be back in her her state and I don't know she's from Vermont maybe Jer appears there either but uh you know I'm thinking to myself I'm like I don't I I would have been like f you guys if they' you know come after me. Um but I don't know who knows who knows what I've done. Uh yeah who knows right. Uh so you said that uh hundreds of thousands would be would have the option of okay you can you can do five years 10 years 15 years 20 years right plead ill uh for your crimes for all the felonies that you've done right you judge blah blah blah uh you can you can do uh 20 years or you can do the uh you can do the trial You can uh go to the military tribunal and you could face upwards of death. All right. Uh and is that death by hanging or firing squad? I don't know which one is it. Uh do they get a choice or is it firing squad or uh hanging? I don't know. We're going to see it, guys. We're going to see it. It's coming. It's coming very soon. Uh we're going to see it probably um within the next I would say within the next few weeks they will start. Now who will be first on the list? Uh like I I've said I think it's going to be uh Brennan Comey.
So we don't know. But I can tell you right now a lot of this stuff's already happened. There's been many executed.
But talking about the suspension of ready habius corpus and Doug you're talking about well not yet because tan downing blah blah blah blah blah.
Well here here's the thing.
>> Uh I don't think you're going to get a >> let's read what it actually means to suspend the red habius corpus from the constitution. You know the letter of law as it is written.
H where was it?
I was just right there.
Thought it was section 9.
There it is. Yeah. Section N. The privilege of Rahabius Corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. That is the only reason to suspend the right of ridabius corpus. Even though they say it's a privilege, it's a right. Comes from the common law.
But the thing is is so many people say, "Oh, well the whole constitution gets suspended." No, it does not. You cannot suspend the constitution because if you suspend the constitution, the entire government goes away.
And again, how how does the public servants suspend the own the the the law of creation?
This is the instrument of government, right? If you suspend the instrument of government, there is no government.
That would be unlawful.
They can't the servant can't suspend its own law of creation.
So this is one of the two mis most misconstrued things of the constitution about well suspend the entire constitution. No, you could suspend uh the the the privilege. Let's say we'll say privilege because that's what it says as it is written for those involved in rebellion or that invasion.
So when we're talking about the the rebellion, you know, that's that domestic violence, internal insurrection, an attempt to overthrow the constitution and war against the people.
Article 4, section 4, which is a political argument, not a judicial one.
What is a rea corpus? Does anybody know what a rehabius corpus really is?
It's for when you get unlawfully arrested.
It's an immediate bring the body before the court. Bring your books and papers and they have to immediately prove. It's supposed to happen like right now without delay.
And they have to prove that they follow the law and due process of the law.
immediately.
And if they don't, if they can't prove that they follow due process of law, they lose immediately. And you are to be immediately released.
That is what the Rahabius Corpus is about.
And it it's on anything, right? They try to say, well, it's only for those that are incarcerated. No. If you're being deprived of any of your rights unlawfully, that's what a ridabius corpus is about.
It's not it's not it was never meant to be for just those incarcerated.
So, um that's what a red habius corpus is about. You're being deprived of say you're being deprived of your children.
Right in my um uh encyclopedia set of the uh all the forms and stuff. Uh there's even a form in there for um oh it's American Jewish prudence pleadings and practice forms encyclopedia set. There's a form in there for Rita Corpus.
to demand your children back if they've been unlawfully taken from you.
Boy, they don't want us to know about that one, do they?
So uh treason is 2381 mark 3571 is where all the the the enumeration of fines got moved too for the most part.
Um yeah, absolutely you can write your own reaabius corpus and uh after my further reading and studies on that actually anybody can do a red habius corpus on behalf of anyone else.
Oh yeah.
Because that's coming to the aid and defense of your fellow man. Because if it's happening to your fellow man, it could be happening to you. And we all have the right to defend, right? The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
That's the whole purpose behind that. It isn't about hunting.
At its root, it's about self-defense.
But that's not what the Second Amendment is really about. The Second Amendment was to so that the government could not strip the people of their right to keep and bear arms so they could defend themselves against tyranny.
That's what the Second Amendment is about.
So um just to clarify that about the red habius corpus and uh how it can be suspended and for what purposes not 100% suspend the red habius corpus and and that particular section is where oh the constitution is suspended No.
So, um there you have it. As it is written in the constitution, what it says as it is written that the privilege of habius corpus shall not be suspended. That is mandatory language unless that's the exception to the rule.
This is a rule of law. This is the rule of law. The fundamental principle, the law, the supreme law of the land, the rule of law. This is the rule of law right here. That's the rule that the the the the Rahabius corpus shall not be suspended. The exception to the rule is except in cases of rebellion or invasion.
In other words, people can be oh, I don't know.
Now, talk about state versus Clark. Uh, what you can make an arrest for without a warrant.
Blackstone's commentaries on the law of England book 4 section 289 the exact same section that I quoted cited from in my my paperwork in my current case is the same exact book and section that the Idaho Supreme Court cited from Blackstone's commentaries on the laws of England. So, uh, just to let you know, Jacqueline, those are the ones that they go go by.
The ones you bought me, those are it, not all the amended versions and all the adapted versions, right? All the rewritten crap. No, back to the original writings of Blackstone's commentaries on Laws of England.
Not all the rewritten crap. So, again, thank you very much. I knew that that's the ones that I wanted.
So, uh um you know that that's the thing is it's it's that's the law.
And yes, Mark, it's 18 USC 2381.
And this is section nine of the Constitution, United States of America, the supreme law of the land.
This is the rule of law.
So this is often misconstrued as suspending the entire constitution when that's not lawful.
or or rebellion, Wendy, right? Like it says, rebellion or invasion.
So, not not not the regular, you know, everyday schmo who gets uh unlawfully arrested. You you cannot suspend that, right?
The exception to the rule is unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion. So, for example, again, back to what I was getting at was what can we make an arrest for without a warrant?
Felonies.
Is it a felony to invade our country, our nation? Yes, it is. Therefore, we don't even need a warrant. And because it has to do with invasion and it's the duty of the military to protect our borders because a well- reggulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state. That's the first part of the second amendment.
That is the duty of the military is to defend this nation from foreign and domestic enemies. It's in the oath that I took to join the Marine Corps.
Imagine that.
So yes, it's only has to do with rebellion or invasion.
That's it. That otherwise the first part is shall not be suspended.
There's no authority to 100% suspend the privilege of habius corpus.
Okay.
Now the thing is is this. Take a look at what's right before that. The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year 1,88.
Now this is the reason why the reaabius corpus is is saying it shall not be suspended except for because it has to do with the previous section or previous clause clause one of section 9.
Uh, sure. Diesel D's question is, "Can I explain the difference between rebellion and insurrection?" Okay. So, um, here's a good one. She's rebellion.
A bunch of farmers come together and tried to stand up for themselves.
That's a rebellion.
When say like a set of men like the bar comes in that is internal insurrection.
That's internal.
So rebellion is when the people do it.
Insurrection is when the public servants do it.
That's the difference between rebellion and insurrection.
and then invasion.
And technically speaking, we could say conrue that the bar are foreign invaders.
It's a set of men who are clothed with authority, color of authority.
So, I hope that I know you said you got it now, Diesel D. So, I hope that clarifies that for everybody out there what the the clear distinction between what a rebellion and a insurrection is.
No. Clause three is no bill of attainer or expostfactal law shall be passed.
Uh, Quantum Kid. Yes, that is the set with the funny S's in it.
It's, in fact, it's the same exact uh writing as what's on uh avalon.yale.edu edu where we're we're fs or s's and yeah, Blackstone's commentaries on the laws of England is what uh Quantum Kid is is asking about.
Well, that's that's quite the conundrum there, uh, SlimFrank, what about when the public servant incite the public to do it? We're not the public. We're the private.
The public is public servants.
Those that are in law, that are in the public, that are bound by the Constitution.
Um, but what what what do you mean in sight?
Okay. Due process of law. If you have a grievance, one, you have the right to petition the court. Number two, you have the right to petition the legislature for the redress of grievances. And like Blackstone says in his commentaries, for uh when it is specifically talking about the laws of nature and these primary absolute rights from the laws of nature for a vindication of these rights, we are supposed to petition the judicial, petition the legislature and if we do not get the relief that we demand, then we can resort to arms in that order.
That's due process of law.
We cannot automatically take up arms and say, "Yeah, yeah, we don't we don't want to waste our time with that."
as as as even in the Declaration of Independence, we have petitioned in the most humblest terms and only been met with repeated injuries. So, they're telling us right there that they petitioned many times before they decided, "Hey, look, we we've just had enough. We've petitioned you. We've warned you. We've told you.
And now we're declaring it.
were taking up arms. And in fact, that was June June of 1775, the declaration for the taking up of taking up of arms, the necessity of taking up arms.
That's a real good read, folks. And I've covered that on here a couple of times.
So, Declaration for the Causes and Necessity of Taking up arms. believe it was was it June June 5th?
June 6, 1775.
Oh, July 6, 175. Whoops.
I thought it was June getting confused with the uh the June uh Lee's resolution.
So, Declaration of the Cause and Necessity of taking up arms, July 6, 1775.
See, that's the one you really want to read, folks.
Even though we have the Declaration of Independence, here's another declaration of why they took up arms basically almost to the day, one year prior to the Declaration of Independence.
But uh yeah, again a really good read here, you know, right, Wendy? and and weaponizing the courts against the American people, waring against Again, the thing is is are they overthrowing the constitution?
Are they waring against the people? That is internal insurrection that evokes article 4 section 4. But in order to properly execute article 4, section 4, what do we have to do? What do we have to do? I just quoted it directly from Blackstones, but let's read it from the supreme law of the land.
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion, and on application of the legislature or the executive when the legislature cannot be convened against domestic violence.
This is the supreme due process of law.
law of the land because law of the land means literally means due process of law. They're one and the same.
Okay.
So, what does it say we are supposed to do?
We are to petition the legislature.
And if the legislature doesn't get convened, it goes to the executive. This has not this is a political argument, not a judicial one.
That's what I'm saying.
So, here's what it says.
This is what's going on right now, right? People wonder where where the president gets this power to do what he's right here.
And the judicial branch doesn't have a say in this.
You know, I I've showed this before.
Let's let's go back to see explanation.
Go to that Luther versus Bordon Texas v. White.
All right. upon request by the state protection against internal insurrection or rebellion. That's what domestic violence is internal or rebellion. So I just explained that as diesel de asked that question for a clear distinction between the two. What what is the difference? One is internal public servants.
The other is external the people but um see there they're to to suppress domestic commotions along with concerns about rebellions. delegates expressed a fears that a monarchy might arise in a particular state and establish a tyranny over the whole United States.
That that's what's happened. That's exactly what's happened again with the Reconstruction Acts. They went back to Roman civil law, back under the monarchy.
Uh, where is it?
Right here.
Except for a brief period during reconstruction, the authority granted by the guarantee clause has been largely unexplored. The Supreme Court and other federal courts have largely declined to hear legal challenges based on the guarantee clause because they present nonjusticeable political questions.
the judicial branch does not have jurisdiction.
So, this also goes back to the question earlier about the um and and I've already talked to him in person on this uh Lloyd Brunson, the Brunson case. Is that not internal insurrection?
Yes. So why are they going through the judicial branch when it specifically says as it is written that we are to petition the legislature for the redress of grievances.
Oh see I I love this right here.
Uh the the clause uses the term domestic violence in the now archaic sense of insurrection or unlawful force fumented within a country and not the modern usage meaning violence between romantic partners or within a household.
But then it says oh see Black's Law Dictionary 11th edition 2022 and the Federalist number 21. Well, I guarantee you Federalist number 21 doesn't have anything to do with domestic relations.
And where in the hell does Congress get the authority to redefine what domestic violence is?
We the people wrote that Constitution, right?
That's the supreme written will of the people.
Public servants have no authority to alter what that means. Well, it's it's now archaic.
It's archaic. It's still written as the Constitution is our supreme law of the land.
It's not archaic. I don't care if it's 250 years old or not.
That's the letter of the law. That's the rule of law.
as it is written.
No, that's bar speak trying to diminish because see, oh, they don't want us to know that domestic violence is actually about internal insurrection.
Now, I'll tell you right now, back in 2019, when I first found this, it didn't say that.
This is one of those uh points where I go, um um I know that they're watching my shows because they went in and changed it and added that verbiage.
They had to clarify that because that's what I brought up then.
So, nope. We most certainly did not grant them the authority to redefine the words in written in the constitution.
But see, notice that they don't site any case. Where's the case?
Why would I need to see domestic violence and blacks law dictionary from 2022 to tell me was something from 200 plus years ago?
Now let's go back to federalist number 21 which explains this particular section or to the constitutional convention itself.
Okay. Slim Frank because the legislators are the corrupt. How do you know?
Show me your petition you filed and it got denied because I'm telling you, I've worked with people that we have done petitions and have prevailed.
It does work factually.
And then the second part here is this gives powers to the president to incite the insurrection act.
I don't care about any act. This is what the supreme law of the land says. That is a duty of the commanderin-chief.
That is what we have the military for.
That's our true republican form of government. And who has what powers?
as it is written. It's not inciting anything.
It's executing the law as it is written.
See right here. See the uh the records of the federal convention of 1787.
Imagine that. Why don't we just read what was talked about, what it actually means as it is written.
But that's why they they put this footnote in here a couple years back trying to cover their ass. It doesn't matter. You're openly admitting that you're saying it's the an archaic sense of insurrection or unlock. It's not archaic.
That's what the letter of the of the law says. It's the rule of law.
Supreme law of the land.
You you you don't get to redefine what it means.
Again, that's the question. Where does Congress get the authority to redefine what domestic violence means pursuant to article 4, section 4?
I don't I don't see that in anywhere part of article one where the legislature was granted the authority to redefine any of the terms of the constitution.
No, they're they're like everybody else.
They are all right. the senators and representatives before mentioned and the members of the several state legislatures and all executive and judicial officers both of the United States and of the several states shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this constitution support.
It doesn't say interpret. It doesn't say redefine.
They are bound to support it.
We the people are not bound by this constitution because we're not public servants. We're not sworn in under oath or affirmation to office.
Has nothing to do with us.
It's for them.
Although we're supposed to follow it as in the process that is due.
Yep. Absolutely. As it is written is very important because that's called the letter of the law or the rule of law as it is written.
and they're all supposed to be bound to support it.
That's where we get into subversion of law, sedition, sedicious conspiracy.
Then we get into the domestic violence, internal insurrection, an attempt to overthrow the constitution that that we the people require them to be bound by to follow it to uphold it because that's what support means is to uphold. You know, like table legs support the tabletop.
Do the table legs get to dictate what's on top of the table?
No. They're bound to support what's on top of the table.
They don't have a choice.
The only choice they have is to not run for office, to not take that oath or affirmation.
And then you don't receive the imalments of that office.
You don't receive a paycheck. You don't receive any of the advantages, profits, or gains from that office.
If you don't want to be bound to support the Constitution, you can go kick rocks somewhere else.
But that's the that's the that's the real problem. Nobody's following the Constitution because they've altered the fundamental law from common law to Roman civil law. It's all code.
See, common law of the land.
This is the common law of the land, right?
this Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof.
We're not talking about statutes.
What they're talking about the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof is an article 5 convention pursuant to the Constitution.
And all treaties made which shall be made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land. That's common law of the land.
Well, Jennifer, you're you're not actually a public servant yet until you're sworn in.
You take that oath and you are bound to support the constitution.
But after that, yes.
That's absolutely correct. Mark, the Law of Nations, book one, chapter 19, subsection 212 clearly defines what a citizen is. a member of a civil society government who is bound to perform certain duties and is subject to its authority.
Oh, by becoming an elected official taking the oath and being bound to support this constitution, you are subjecting yourself in law.
This is how you get in law, not at law.
See, that's the clear distinction between in law and at law.
The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. Everybody goes, "Oh, Article One court. I want an article 3 court." No, you don't.
And they're not article one courts.
There's only one judicial power.
These are inferior to the one Supreme Court.
There's only the judicial power.
And what is it?
The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and in equity arising under this constitution.
The laws of the United States and treaties made or which shall be made under their authority.
See, it's the judicial power, but again, it's only one M.
I know, Jacqueline. Thank you. Thank you.
But this is, you know, I've covered this before. A lot of people are so confused, you know, on this the judicial power and the fact that it's vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. That doesn't make them article one courts.
It's still an article three court for suits in law.
Right now when we look at article the 7th which they call seventh amendment in suits at common law.
Uh let's see district courts. This is Idaho Constitution. Article 5, judicial department. The state shall be divided into five jud.
Oh, wait. It's not the not the one I was looking for.
I thought it was that one.
Original and appellet jurisdiction.
Supreme Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction to review on appeal any decision of the district courts, the judges thereof.
Any now when we say original jurisdiction, it means it origin originates there.
It starts there.
right here. The Supreme Court shall also have original jurisdiction to issue Rits of Mandamus, Cersiorei, Prohibition, and Habius Corpus, and all Rits necessary proper to complete the exercise of its appellet jurisdiction. So, the Supreme Court is where we're supposed to be filing rits of review, rits of mandamus.
Rits of Rits are supposed to go to the Supreme Court as original jurisdiction.
I swear I saw this in here.
Oh, there it is. Jurisdiction of the district court. The district court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases both at law and inequity and such appellet jurisdiction as may be conferred by law.
That's common law.
At law, not article three in law.
That is the clear distinction.
In law is those who are bound by the constitution are in law and is subject to its authority to all things that are made pursuant to it.
They are bound by that. So statutes apply to them. American juristprudence volume 16 constitutional law section two statutes are for government civil conduct.
It is to control their conduct not ours.
We did not give government state or federal the authority to make any legislation applicable to the people in the private because we live at law. We are not in law.
That is the two different jurisdictions or bodies of law.
And just so we can really clarify this, let's look at blow your mind. Judiciary Act of 1789.
Oh, wait a minute. Why does it talk about common law?
Well, well, I'll be darn. Would would you look at that in the Judiciary Act of 1789?
Talk about common law.
The right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it even in law. A suit in law. Yes. Still right shall have also exclusive original causes of civil causes of admiral tea and maritime jets in law include all seizures under laws of impost navigation or trade of the United States where the seizures are made on waters or navigable from the sea or vessels or 10 or more tons ben within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas. saving to suitors in all cases the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it and shall also have exclusive original cog cognances of all seizures on land rather waters than a foret made of all suits blah blah blah blah of all suits at common law where the United States sue in the matter of dispute amount common law and it shall be by jury Even in cases of Admiral T and maritime jurisdiction.
Oh wait, pardon me. And all causes except civil causes of admiral and maritime jurisdiction shall be by jury.
And that's for trials in the district courts.
Uh be it further added, the circuit the circuit court shall have original cognizances concurrent with the courts of the several states of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity where the matter in disputes exceeds exclusive cost of some value of $500 and the United States are plaintiffs or petitioners or an alien is a party.
But even in the judiciary act of 1789 they've referenced the common law even in abil and maritime because that suits in law but that's only if it's civil in nature not criminal in nature right because the constitution makes it very clear that in all criminal even in the constitution it says right um oh yeah right here uh section three treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them that's that internal insurrection that's why it's treason folks I thought Article 3 had that in there.
Maybe it was section 9.
No, no. Where is it?
Anyway, it's it's here in the constitution itself where it says the trial of all crimes shall be by jury.
Crimes criminal I swear.
How am I missing this?
I just can't. I thought it was actually in article two where it said it.
Yeah, it's not.
Anywh who, and by the way out there folks, it's uh uh my first name is spelled K I R K.
is Kirk like Captain Kirk.
An American constitutionalist. Huh?
Jennifer, how about just say you're an American.
Section two, clause three.
seen that.
H wouldn't here we go. Wouldn't the MS-13 gang members be considered giving aid and comfort to our enemies who are waring against the people? Uh, what is violence if it is not waring against us?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
That would be a foreign invasion.
There's a perfect example of foreign invasion.
I was looking for the part where it says in the constitution, the trial of all crimes shall be by jury. Trial by jury.
It's in the constitution itself. And I'm not talking about seventh amendment.
I thought it was an article two.
Oh, there it is right there.
Section two, clause three. You're right.
I was in the wrong section there. Uh, article. The trial of all crimes except in cases of impeachment shall be by jury and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crime shall have been committed. And when not committed within any state, the trial shall be such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
So, we got it. We got it. Busy B buzzing. We got it figured out. Article 3, section 2, clause three.
So, even with the judiciary, which is consistent I would say the judiciary act is consistent with the constitution.
But again, notice that the judiciary act of 1789 references many times to the common law.
Yeah, buddy. Common law is the law.
Okay.
It's supposed to be.
Now, this goes and explains how and why the entire judicial branch is corrupt.
Because there no longer suits at common law. Even the Idaho Constitution requires it to be at common law.
They do not have Admiral T and maritime jurisdiction.
And even if they did, which they don't because it clearly doesn't state that here, right? They don't have that.
So again, what what are we being subjected to? Roman civil law, the code.
That's the truth. That's the reality.
That's what we need to call it out as a foreign jurisdiction.
It is unlawful.
Okay.
All right, folks.
If you enjoy my shows and want to help support me, I greatly appreciate it over on Patreon.
Uh links are in the description down there, plus on my website, kirkslawcorner.com.
Uh if you want to make a direct donation, you can do that through uh uh buy me a coffee. Link is down in the descriptions there. I'd greatly appreciate some donations over here.
really appreciate the support that I have gotten from uh those that are subscribers and have donated through buy me a cup of coffee there.
Um special thanks to uh my uh patrons on Patreon.
Uh all of them over there, but uh specifically those ones in uh tier three and tier four.
Uh, Diesel D's, Wendy, Jacqueline, Ralph, um, Prayer Warrior.
Um, don't forget Chin.
Uh, Windy. Oh, yeah. I already said Wendy.
Those are the main ones there that I can remember right off the top of my head.
So, please forgive me if I forgot to name you uh personally here today tonight, but uh do uh want to uh Oh, yeah.
Michael. Yep.
But uh yeah, definitely want to send a shout out to all those supporters and uh for your continued support and being here learning right along with me, right? We're all learning this together. I, you know, reading and sharing what I learn as I go as well. So, um yeah.
So, thank you all for being here tonight.
God bless. Much love and uh Wednesday night workshop. We'll see you folks over there. And uh if anybody needs one-on-one time with me, that's tier 4 through Patreon.
And uh that link is in the description as well to my Patreon. It's also on the website, kirkslawcorner.com.
Um other than that, be safe.
Keep your eyes peeled. Pay attention to your surroundings and what's going on.
And uh viruses do not exist.
Did
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











