In criminal justice, judges must balance rehabilitation opportunities with public safety when sentencing repeat offenders, particularly those with substance abuse issues; even when a defendant demonstrates genuine rehabilitation efforts and commitment to treatment, the court may still impose significant prison sentences if the criminal history is extensive and poses ongoing risks to society.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
30+ Arrests Later... Judge West Finally Sends Repeat Offender To PrisonAdded:
to second-degree felony offenses with caps of 10 years in each of those cases to run concurrently as the agreement. Is that correct?
>> Yes, sir.
>> I've received the pre-sentence report as well as an update report that just has some more specific information from criminal history from Spokane, Washington. Did everyone get that?
>> Yes, sir.
>> Yes, they did.
>> Are there any additions or corrections to the pre-sentence report?
>> Not that we know of, sir.
>> All right, Mr. Kimler, you may proceed.
>> The PSR reflects extensive criminal history on Mr. Marbles and the fact that he committed the offenses. The fact that he Mr. Mayor that cases can be enhanced into second degrees which implies that he does have extensive history.
The facts of these two cases are both as the defendant indicated in the pre-sentence report. He was under the influence of methamphetamine at the time both were committed. It's not offered as any type of mitigating or exculpatory.
However, it's offered as pre-as mitigation but it does kind of explain why somebody with this criminal history would be doing what he's done with the laundry basket and these items from Walmart all of which were under I think probably the class B range of of the theft. I would observe that there is three appears to be $300 in restitution payable in one of the cases for the laundry basket.
Um Obviously methamphetamine drug addiction but for that I think Mr. Marbles wouldn't been doing these types of low headed thefts.
He's recognized that and counseling with him he's got at least what I asked him or what they suggested that he do and that's to go into an inpatient rehabilitation program drug rehab program to try to address the substance abuse issues that he's suffered from from early and early age which is indicated in the report in the pre-sentence report. [clears throat] This has been a ongoing thing almost his whole And I think he's done that and that he's he's um I don't think you can say terrified of going to prison, but certainly doesn't want to go to prison and I think he's willing to do what he needs to do to to stay out of prison, to comply with any terms of probation, to do his sessions.
He indicates to me that he is drug free, which obviously if he drug tested him this morning that would be corroborated or not if he's not drug free or something, I don't know. But I assume that would hope that he would.
And he would just like to address the court less better than I would take advantage of his position and why I think his information is appropriate.
>> Are you um Are you wearing a drug patch?
>> No, ma'am. You are but I'm going to place one on you to see if I need >> Have a seat in the jury box. Let's get that checked out first.
Okay, so the test was negative. Um Mr. Abarca, you wanted to say something, sir?
>> You could address the court.
>> Yes, sir. I'm I'm just y'all are putting probably not all the drugs in my whole life.
Um I want to treat me.
I was 21 when this case came about you know.
Everything my whole life they they tell me you know no problem.
And I'm sober. Anyway, so I've been clean and sober for 38 years. I go to AA and NA.
I like it too. I belong. I got a sponsor today. I work the 12 steps. I just started step four.
And what I found was a purpose I never had.
And I think I can do well >> [snorts] >> on probation you know.
Hopefully one day you say somebody else can.
Do another day and you know what I did.
Which is probably drug addiction.
That helps.
That's all right.
>> Thank you, sir.
>> Mr. Foreman.
>> Judge, I'll be brief. I think the PSI speaks for itself as far as criminal history. I would like to add I have uh judgments here. I've made them available to Mr. Camber for additional convictions that were either not included in the PSI or they could not confirm those. And for the record, Judge, I am speaking of a 2013 aggravated assault out of uh St. Charles, Louisiana, where it was the defendant received a 6-month probation.
Uh also a 2008 possession of a controlled substance case out of Camber in which the defendant was revoked to 12 to 20 months. And a 2013 fleeing or attempting to elude out of Camber for which the defendant received 5 days. I think that one is actually reflected in the PSI.
>> Okay.
>> The 5-day waiver.
>> Yes.
>> Uh and uh also, Judge, I have judgments out of uh Spokane, Washington for one, two, three thefts.
Uh if one from 2011, two of them it looks like it was a concurrent uh 1-year probation in 2008. And also a 2008 assault uh out of Spokane, Washington in which the defendant received 338 days.
Uh and I've marked them on my on my habit also, Judge.
>> The drug addiction.
Uh I'll I don't know that I need them.
I've made the notes and we'll take that into consideration as well.
>> all I have. [laughter] Uh I think the the defendant gave his criminal history.
If if it's a risk of sounding callous, Judge, I I get it. People are uh struggling with drug drug addiction all the time. But at a certain point, Judge, there comes a point where the consideration needs to be extended to the public. Uh this defendant's been uh having contact with law enforcement since 1988.
Uh and he has spent at least three different stages of his criminal behavior. Judge, he's fortunate to have a capital 10. He's He's exposed to 20 years.
I'm asking the court to sentence him to the 10 years.
>> [snorts] >> 4 years.
Give me longer.
I'm sorry.
Sex offender.
>> You'll be all right.
>> Yeah, I see you once very soon.
>> Answer.
Arkansas.
>> Tennessee, preferably.
>> Alabama.
>> [clears throat] [clears throat] >> I guess my biggest issue Mr. Barbo is well, I'm one of the biggest issues is I I appreciate and I'm glad that you have done what you've done over the last few months.
>> [snorts] >> I think you probably started off doing that for the wrong reason and that's because you got caught again and you're looking at 20 years in prison.
I sounds like maybe you're doing better and that's great. I just wonder why >> 18.
>> it's taken so long. It looks like you went to the Unity House back in 1986 and other than that it's just at some point you've got to take responsibility before you commit an offense, not after.
I've counted 24 misdemeanors.
I think with some of the ones that Mr. Coleman has said there's probably actually more than that. Some There were some records that couldn't be found from different states. They're probably looking at it more like 30.
Um seven felony convictions. You've been to prison.
You've It's just It's just too much. Um and at some point there has to be an end to what you're doing and get that help before you continue what you're doing.
I'm going to find in each of your cases that you entered your pleas of guilty freely and voluntarily.
In cause number 24 DCCR 1722, find sufficient evidence to find you guilty and at this time finds you guilty of theft, find your prior enhancement convictions true, sentence you to a term of 7 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Corrections.
You will receive credit on that sentence for any time that you've been in custody that the law gives you the right to receive. Cause number 24 DCCR 2289 also find sufficient evidence to find you guilty and at this time finds you guilty of theft and find those prior enhancements true, sentence you to a term of 7 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Corrections. You will also receive credit on that sentence for any time that you've been in custody that the law gives you the right to receive.
Um these will run concurrently, which means together at the same time. I've handed you the trial court certification in each of those cases that shows that these were agreements that I followed and so you waived your right to appeal.
I have also handed you a written admonishment regarding your ineligibility to possess a firearm or ammunition because of the judgments entered against you. You're ineligible under Texas law to possess a firearm or ammunition. Possession of a firearm or ammunition could lead to charges against you. Firearm is a legal term. You should read the written admonishment I provide you to see what devices
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











