Political extremists often target journalists who solve problems through dialogue rather than empty rhetoric, because such journalists demonstrate that constructive debate is possible, which threatens the extremists' narrative that conflict and enemies are necessary for political engagement.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Por que Erika Hilton decidiu ME CENSURAR mas poupa os bolsonaristas raiz? Medo?Added:
Hello, welcome to my channel. I am Madelene Elástico, a journalist for 30 years. This is my independent channel, where I bring you current news and make you think. No one here will tell you what to think. This is a space for you to think for yourself. And in this video, I bring a provocation, which is the following: Erica Hilton decided to censor me, but spares the journalists who are Bolsonaro supporters.
Isn't that a rather curious choice, given the intense rivalry? I don't know if you're aware of the story about Erica Hilton's censorship of me, which is a story the government still hasn't undone.
Many journalists have been censored in Brazil, you know that. But that required the involvement of the judiciary.
So, we hear about this case, that case, where someone took down the network, took this, took that, always going through the judicial system.
What happened to me? I am the first to be censored by the executive branch without needing the legal process, without having to go through the judiciary. And the person who did this was Erica Hilton, a very crazy mechanism that goes like this. Erica Hilton filed a false complaint with the Attorney General's Office claiming I was spreading misinformation about the anti- misogyny bill, when in fact I was criticizing the bill. Based on that, without legal process, without Xandão, without any of that.
The government itself went there and ordered X to take it off the air, to censor me.
And then I start thinking, why, with so many right-wing journalists, are they doing this?
I was the one who was chosen.
And I'm telling you this because I'm the main nightmare for anyone with authoritarian delusions like Erica Hilton.
And what is the debate that Erica Hilton wants? The debate that Erica Hilton wants to have is this one that I'm going to show you.
This type of debate is n't the kind I usually engage in, but it's the kind Kica Hilton feels very comfortable engaging in.
I'll even refresh this screen so you can see.
What do you think, please? What do you guys think about this? What do you think?
So, there you go, you already know my answer, do you want to end up using the bathroom with you? Is this what you want? Every time you use a bathroom, you want to put it in your own bathroom; that's what you want as a third bathroom. You want to disrupt our work, you want to take women's places, isn't that right?
What is Erica Hilton expecting? This is the kind of clash where there's no discussion, where things escalate to low blows, where it gives the impression that Érica Hilton works as hard as the other parliamentarians, even though her job is solely to create a buzz online, she doesn't show up for committee meetings, she doesn't show up for the things she has to do, which is what? They want to stir things up around this empty debate.
If Erica Hilton aims to censor from the other side, she loses the opportunity to engage with someone.
So, who needs to be silenced?
Nightmare, Jerca. I have to be silenced because I show that it's not necessary to resort to vulgarity and authoritarianism in political debate.
And here I'm going to show you a video of a comedian from Monty Python that I love, John Cis. This is an old video that I translated for you, which talks about the good side of extremism. That 's very funny.
It's very funny, but it's also very enlightening. I love this video. I was the one who added the subtitles. And here you can understand perfectly why Erica Hilton's worst nightmare is me. And why did Erica Hilton, facing the entire right wing's criticism, need to hear "it's not me behind you," and not anyone else shouting in the same tone?
Let's take a look here.
The biggest advantage of extremism is that it makes you feel good because it provides you with enemies. They explain the great thing about having enemies is that you can pretend that all the badness in the whole world is in your enemies and all the goodness in the whole world is in you. Attractive, isn't it?
If you have a lot of anger and resentment in you anyway and you therefore enjoy abusing people then you can intend that you're only doing it because these enemies of yours are such very bad persons and that if it wasn't for them youd actually be good natured and courteous rational all the time. So if you want to feel good become an extremist. Okay, now you have a choice. If you join the hard left, they'll give you their list of authorized enemies. Almost all kinds of authority, especially the police, the city, Americans, judges, multinational corporations, public schools, newspaper owners, fox hunters, generals, class traitors, and of course moderators.
Or if you'd rather be an extremist on the hard right, no problem, you still get a lovely list of enemies, only they're different ones. Noisy minority groups, unions, Russia, we demonstrators, welfare spongers, medalson clurgy pecnicks, BBC, strikers, social workers, communists, and of course moderates and upstart actors.
Once you're armed with one of these super lists of enemies, you can be as nasty as you like and yet feel your behaviors morally justified. So you can strut around abusing people and telling them you could eat them for breakfast and still think of yourself as a champion of the truth, a fighter for the greater good and not the rather sad paranoid skitid that you really are. And all this explains what we saw at party conferences. Everyone's sitting there looking grim bored. And then a speaker gets up with real fire in his belly as well as dyspia and he says the other party really are the most awful bunch of rotters. The most left-wing or right-wing bunch has ever been in this great country of us. And it would be a disaster if you ever got into power or held on to power. So we must get into power or hold on to power. But there is going to be a tremendous fight, a terrific struggle. And we can't relax and enjoy ourselves. No, we must struggle and fight and fight and struggle and struggle and struggle and fight and fight against these enemies and then struggle a little bit more at the end of that. And then the speaker goes and sits down and there's a lovely warm glow throughout the hall as if theyd all had tea and crumpets. And everyone looks relaxed and happy and simply radiant with good will. Although if the speaker had said we must all have lots of fun and be nice to each other and cooperate in solving problems, they probably have lynched him or deselected him or taken all his directorships away because [laughs] attacking our enemies always makes us feel good and excited.
In fact, just about the only disadvantage to extremism is that it can never solve problems.
solving problems is a real bore compared with healing victory and sparing to spash capitalism and crush socialism and generally feeling good solving problems involves frustrating things like listening to people with different views and learning from.
So, what did you guys think?
This explains why Erica Hilton publicly clashes with those who are very far- right, but when it's time to shut up, when she can't stand it anymore, she comes after me. Why? Because I'm having a debate that solves problems.
I want to hear from women. What am I showing about Erica Hilton?
Authoritarianism, silencing women in a systematic and cowardly manner, using judicial means. It's an office that doesn't produce legislation, that practically only has a department dedicated to persecuting women. And I interview these women, I tell these stories, I point out what is really happening. And that's why I'm so desperate, why I need to be quiet, because I'm in this unpleasant part of solving problems.
And what we see from many noisy people is that if the problem disappears, these people cease to exist.
To help you pay attention to these types of manipulative speeches that are very frequent, we see them a lot in politics nowadays, but they also exist in companies, within your family, in your circle of friends, and at university. To help you be prepared for these challenges, I invented the verbal self-defense method.
Check out the Qode here on the screen. The link is in the description; you have the supporters coupon to get a discount and you can split the payment into up to 12 installments with no interest.
And I'll teach you about situations like this where suddenly someone is offering you a war against a great enemy that you're going to win, but in reality, that person is just sweet-talking you.
Or there are people who seem very well- intentioned and very well-mannered to everyone around them, but they 're always putting you down, and when you complain, you're the one who ends up having to apologize. Have you ever been in a situation where you had to apologize for something you didn't do? With verbal self-defense, you'll never go through this again. Don't forget to subscribe to the channel here. Subscribe to the channel, leave a like (it really helps with engagement), and leave a comment. I'm going to read a little bit of what the members are saying. Does she spare Bolsonaro supporters, or does she know she can't attack them directly? I have the impression that they both chose you as a deterrent. Exactly. They share the same goals, which are to show that it's possible to solve problems instead of engaging in empty discussions and promising non-existent solutions to people.
Good afternoon. Great videos. to be able to see it live.
Madá, you already know, you know who the politicians are who most often go to court? It's just curiosity, really. Lu's actions against Erica Hilton are unheard of; there is no precedent in the history of Parliament for judicial harassment of the magnitude that Erica Hilton is perpetrating. It's an office exclusively for dealing with judicial harassment. The rest have some names that vary; there are politicians who are even obscure and whom you don't hear much about in the media because they get sued for anything you say. This has aspects of the left and the right as well. She attacks you because your approach, the way you present yourself, is effective in conveying the idea that erodes her argument, which feeds back into the clashes of the radical right. Exactly. She uses opposition to amplify her own narrative, but when it comes to me, because I end up demolishing Erica Hilton's false narrative, she needs to censor me, because that's the only way she can exist.
And that's it, folks. Thank you very much for your participation. Keep watching the videos on the channel, the live streams, and the clips I'm posting. We 're investing a lot more here.
Consider becoming a member. Don't forget to leave a like and a comment; it really helps with engagement.
Kisses, kisses, and see you later.
Related Videos
VALORANT's Latest 'Exclusive' Tier Bundle is Rough...
KangaValorant
17K views•2026-05-28
Flight Attendant Mocks Poor Looking Black Woman — Mid Air Announcement Exposes Her Real Power
SkyboundStories-b4r
184 views•2026-05-28
I FIXED My Friend’s Blown Turbo RX-8… Then Sold It
Cameron-RX8
134 views•2026-05-28
NewsWatch 12 at 5: Top Stories
NewsWatch12
1K views•2026-05-28
Simon Jordan & Danny Murphy deliver PREDICTIONS for Arsenal's Champions League FINAL with PSG
talkSPORTArsenal
6K views•2026-05-28
Botting is OUT OF CONTROL in Classic WoW (Again)...
SolheimGaming
108 views•2026-05-28
The "AI Job Apocalypse" is CANCELLED!
WesRoth
9K views•2026-05-28
STREET FIGHTER 6 - INGRID Story Walkthrough @ 4K 60ᶠᵖˢ ✔
RajmanGamingHD
12K views•2026-05-28











