Sellafield (Part 1) Are We Healthy?

Ajouté : 2026-05-19

[00:00:00]Britain is currently panicking about Palunteer  and NHS data. And yes, a CIA funded surveillance company having access to everybody's hospital  records is a terrible thing. But nobody is prepared for what that data is going to reveal  about Great Britain. Palunteer make their money by renting the infrastructure of insight to the  government. their selling point. What they can do differently is they will scoop up all of  that data into a data lake and then they will be able to look at it and ask questions  and pull insights and advise the government.

[00:00:36]This video is not about Palunteer. It's about  Ciffield. It's about what is in that health data.

[00:00:43]What exactly are Palunteer going to see? This reel  might save the UK government £300,000 because you don't need Palunteer to know what the crisis is.  If Palunteer run their models honestly, the story that that data is going to tell about our  health is far worse than any privacy nightmare.

[00:01:06]We are fighting over who can see our medical  records while a 100-year-old bomb factory on a cliff is bleeding swimming pools of radioactive  waste into the ocean already. If you're worried about your health data, ask yourself what [ __ ]  health is left when Ciffield is underwater because Palunteer will run the models all right  but they won't be able to make anybody act.

[00:01:32]So even the elusive and amazing  insights that this technology promises will get hidden behind commercial confidentiality.  I spent my weekend using AI to help me read data that was too emotional for me to look at. With  AI's help and the help of volunteer actuaries in my Discord, I have pulled together a massive data  kit. We have identified all of the 12,396 sites where there is mass scale industrial  contamination. And we have identified 3,59 of those sites sit within 10 km of a coastline.  I asked the AI system that was helping us do this horrible work. Give it to me straight. Where are  the top five most contaminated sites? Where is the worst? Where is the most urgent? And it's  number one top of the list reason to be afraid is Cfield. The AI said is the one  that makes me truly terrified.

[00:02:49]But I also asked it, "Has the window closed?"  And it said, "No." So instead of worrying about Palunteer and who is snooping in your underwear  or how much that costs the taxpayer to install, we need to get educated and start educating  because it is not yet too late to close this to make it safer to avoid global level  catastrophic risk. But it will be soon.

[00:03:16]And the people who are making the decisions about  this are not ruthless, greedy, or stupid. They are all three predominantly led by the latter. They  are stupid. So here are some brutal, hard to hear home truths about Ciffield, followed by the  actions that we all need to take immediately to make sure that this this modeled reality doesn't  come true. Cfield sits on the coast of Cumbria in northwest England. It has been leaking 2,100 lers  of radioactive activity into the water every day since 2018. That is an Olympic size swimming pool  of radioactivity being dumped into the Irish Sea every 3 years. This plant covers two square miles.  It contains more than 200 nuclear facilities.

[00:04:11]It runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and  there are 10,000 people working there. I want you to really focus and notice the three small letters  on this map. It's Cofield Limited. This company is currently making a profit of 800 million pounds a  year taking other countries spent fuel and storing it here. The people responsible for this are  individual humans with names and addresses listed on company's house. This is Paul Andrew Valance.  He is the experienced board director at Cfield.

[00:04:49]He is responsible for information control  around the UK's nuclear cleanup business.

[00:04:55]He sits on the board at the most dangerous  and hazardous nuclear site on the planet.

[00:05:02]He has been managing the nuclear decommissioning  authorities reputation since 2016. Paul Valance sits on the board of this limited company, but  this limited company has only one shareholder, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. Firstly,  the NDA has a snazzy new logo on the UK government website, which I shudder to think how much that  cost, how much they have spent on press and propaganda over this. This takes money from the  central government. It is funded by taxpayers, but then it is the only shareholder on a private  limited company that is making over800 million a year accepting other people's nuclear waste.  The NDA is taking 2.7 billion pounds a year from taxpayers. Its service agreements  guarantee that every penny of that is covered.

[00:05:53]The government is accepting full risk.  the taxpayer will pay for their mistakes.

[00:06:00]Twothirds of that spend, roughly 1.9 billion  pounds, goes to over 1,000 private contractors whose supply chain charter commitments are  self-reported and also opaque. Their strap line is literally cleaning up our nuclear past  faster, safer, and sooner. This is presented as a public interest body. They're cleaning up the  environment. They're decommissioning the nuclear, right? No, this is not decommissioning [ __ ] It  is wasting taxpayer money branding the incoming disaster. Ciffield is not being decommissioned.  The reinforcement construction on the four most dangerous buildings here is moving further  and further away from completion every year.

[00:06:42]It's now scheduled for 209, 48 years behind  target and far too late to protect anybody.

[00:06:50]Two, it is leaking. When the board of this  body were sitting on meetings discussing the legibility of the A in that circle, Ciffield  has been leaking 2,100 L of radioactive water into the ground and into the sea every single day  since 2018. The NDA calls itself a cleanup body, but functionally and legally on paper, it is a  commercial operator and it ensures itself through its own captive insurer. So the commercial market  never has to price the real risk of failure here.

[00:07:27]Rutherford Insurance Agency is wholly owned by  the NDA. If the risk levels were manageable and the institution was clean, they would not  need their own captive insurer. They would go to Lloyds of London. The blunt reality is they  don't want Lloyds of London to see these numbers.

[00:07:45]As soon as Lloyd's price, the public knows  the way that this is all structured is stupid.

[00:07:53]It is the epitome of capitalism as the snake that  eats its own [ __ ] tail. The British government owns the site. Okay. It is then it has then set up  a body that ensures the site through a subsidiary that is backed by the government. If the site  fails, it is the British government who pays regardless. It is the taxpayer who pays. The  concept of insurance is to transfer risk to get help from a third party if something catastrophic  happens. This is not a risk transfer. It is a bureaucratic fiction. All it does is hides the  risk. It isn't solving anything. It's just adding another layer of institutional complexity between  the public and the truth of what they are being exposed to. The taxpayer is committed to funding  the cleanup. The taxpayer is also committed to ensure these intermediary companies against  their business failure. The taxpayer carries the liability if the entire Atlantic Ocean gets  poisoned. And in between reality and the taxpayer there is the NDA, Ciffield Limited, Rutherford  and Deemnity Limited, Nuclear Transport Solutions, Nuclear Waste Services, Nuclear Restoration  Services, NDA Properties Limited, Energist, and over a thousand private contractors. All of  them taking their own fees, their own salaries, their own margins from the same public crisis  that is getting worse every day. Every layer of this is designed to make it harder to answer  the question, who is responsible if this fails?

[00:09:31]The answer, when you strip away all of the Russian  dolls, is you are. And it's failing now. These bodies have just spent decades pouring taxpayer  resources, energy, and time into making sure that you can't see this clearly enough to get angry  about it before it's too late. Get angry about