It's FINISHED: Akosua Serwaa WIN Court Case Aga!$nt Odo broni & Calvin on LA on Daddy Lumba Property

Hinzugefügt: 2026-05-31

[00:00:02]20 years ago.

[00:00:13]Thank you.

[00:00:19]Now, the last time 1994 years. Three years.

[00:01:01]Thank you.

[00:01:05]business ideas.

[00:01:10]Mhm.

[00:01:21]Those times every month sometimes this kind of unnecessary defense American passport.

[00:02:01]Martin Luther King.

[00:02:33]Oh, before Yeah.

[00:03:17]Fresh family oriented businesses oriented businesses.

[00:03:36]Africa.

[00:04:26]Ghana saychech.

[00:04:53]What you are saying, NDP, More DC.

[00:05:54]problem. No problem papa problem.

[00:06:31]This one answer 11.

[00:06:59]Ghana population.

[00:07:22]Sister Ghana. Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Max.

[00:08:09]Follow I'm sorry.

[00:08:47]So that is what the law is about.

[00:08:49]>> Yeah.

[00:09:00]Let me finish. When you were speaking, I was so quiet. Let me finish.

[00:09:08]Succession Lord PNC1 status I have to open it so that I help the followers no allow me I'm addressing the Let me finish.

[00:09:45]>> Not the inter I didn't even mention the law. I didn't even mention law. What is your question?

[00:09:51]>> My question was that it doesn't matter how we we we fix the semantics about being a wife whether accept it whether the children accept it whether the whole Ghanaians accept it. The point is that if mommy is given the early now and allowed to proceed to go and whether share, distribute, transfer, whatever we we term it. The point is that at the moment, whatever the case is, will be she will receive the share of a wife under the law.

[00:10:18]You don't know that for a fact. You don't know that.

[00:10:20]>> But right now, is she not a wife?

[00:10:21]>> You don't know that. Nobody's You don't know that for a fact.

[00:10:36]Let me let me move on to my next question. If somebody I'm done answering your questions, let someone else come. I'm done answering your questions.

[00:10:44]>> Okay.

[00:10:45]Then then if he's done I have to I have to turn my question into a submission because it's it's not fair.

[00:10:58]>> I stood here to listen to the thing. So if even if I will not I will not be allowed to ask a question then let me turn my questions into into service I don't want your All right, let someone else.

[00:11:41]Yeah. Thank you. Let's go.

[00:11:44]>> Storage.

[00:11:45]>> Okay. My first question is um Okay. My first question should be Denise.

[00:12:03]Do you have the reasons behind why why they why they file for the caveats? Can you teach us? Um I have I don't want I I have but I don't want to go into it.

[00:12:12]I'll send the document.

[00:12:16]I don't want to go into it.

[00:12:19]>> Okay. So the next question I know probably question the second question is when went to court was his status or file for was his status challenge in court?

[00:12:34]>> Was her status status?

[00:12:37]>> Yes. Ah, I I I don't know. I I don't want to answer that because the person is already in court. Ah, the other woman every now and then the court has accepted the application.

[00:13:02]Verdict, people are challenging the application. So if she status was challenged in court, why is she still there?

[00:13:17]>> That is what I'm saying. If it was somebody Hold on, [ __ ] Hold on.

[00:13:44]Hold on.

[00:13:46]All right.

[00:13:52]Hey. Okay.

[00:13:58]>> Okay. Okay.

[00:14:00]>> All right.

[00:14:02]All right. Um, questions.

[00:14:04]I will have to I'll have to just address some of the issues here. Do you allow me a little bit? Um for um do you can you tell us any any other like three or four or three other supplement?

[00:14:23]Can you tell us?

[00:14:26]>> Your question?

[00:14:28]My question is when somebody can you tell us three of those documents please come again come again I didn't get your the forh the other supplementary document is in chat and it's full. Can you state two? Can you can you give us three or four of the documents?

[00:15:12]>> Oh no. I I concerning the case. Do you want information on >> concerning this case? Yes.

[00:15:24]>> Concerning the case. Concerning the case, you see storage.

[00:15:28]>> If we talk about caveat in itself, the information is online. Anybody can Google what caveat means and how Ghana Ghana exclusively in this case they came in to say the law court which is um the Kumi High Court there's a verdict 28th November verdict. Ah, a mention.

[00:16:21]Jesus Christ.

[00:16:33]Oh boy.

[00:16:40]Good afternoon.

[00:16:41]>> Good afternoon.

[00:16:51]Um, okay.

[00:17:09]For a long time for a long time because they look for your interaction voice from the background.

[00:17:22]Okay.

[00:17:24]So we speak with a certain um evidence evidence.

[00:17:54]Oh, who is this?

[00:17:59]>> So they came with they they came with what?

[00:18:03]Um um a reason and they came with an evidence. The evidence was that the Edum High Court has given a judicial determination a verdict.

[00:18:24]doesn't you still haven't answered my question.

[00:18:38]And then they stated that the court said you are now coming to court argue why you have to be part and why you don't believe has been thrown out. What does that tell you? So is answering what supplementary documents were added and blah blah blah.

[00:19:11]The final thing is that whatever was added or whatever was brought to court, they even fought for jurisdiction of the case.

[00:19:28]So at the end of the day, the issue is when I ask you a question and you don't want to answer, it's fine.

[00:19:35]But what you how how you answering the question and where you're going, I don't think it's fine. But let me go ahead and just let you know.

[00:19:44]So now you you are trying to say question answer. No, I'm not answering.

[00:19:49]I'm answering the question the best way I can.

[00:19:50]>> No, I'm not answering the question.

[00:19:52]Okay. The best way that you can. Okay, that's >> I've answered your question.

[00:19:55]>> Yeah. Yeah, I understand. But I don't think so. That's the question. I asked you for three or four things.

[00:19:58]>> Okay. Then then that's that. Okay. Then it's okay.

[00:20:12]summarize it.

[00:20:19]>> Okay.

[00:20:39]questions.

[00:20:42]Questions questions.

[00:20:54]All right.

[00:21:08]of death. What about the marriage certificate? Was she able to add that one to it?

[00:21:13]>> That's my question.

[00:21:16]D. Um the question should I application status.

[00:21:59]Several times twice or three times.

[00:22:06]Listen, you don't have to stress me. The law says that surviving The law says that surviving spouse it is a court need to meet.

[00:22:35]No, because what >> I was here when you were telling the other guy said man answer certain question but you handle it. Why are you forcing me to answer questions I've already answered over and over again?

[00:22:48]Because you want me to say nobody want answer question was teaching us he was able to look on your phone please let let me ask my question please you were giving us uh what do you call it you were showing us documents that's the cause of death to details about how even barrier certificate all those things you Ma'am, listen. I was not showing you. Somebody asked you asked me.

[00:23:24]Roland asks a question about attachment about certificate, death certificate.

[00:23:43]public domain document. Okay. So now here's my question.

[00:23:56]I was showing like requirement of All right. So don't misquote.

[00:24:23]>> Okay. So in this case as part of her statusific as part of listen.

[00:24:36]>> Let me conclude the question please.

[00:24:40]To conclude >> okay conclude conclude. As far as this document that you are showing to us is in public definitely certificate will also come to public and I'm asking say is it part of the document that you are showing that evidence if not you can just say no I I don't have problem with it. Oh de I I I don't want to talk about that. So we can simple question.

[00:25:12]>> Yeah.

[00:25:14]>> Yes, sir.

[00:25:19]Right.

[00:25:20]>> Mhm.

[00:25:21]>> I have the same document on my phone right now.

[00:25:24]>> Exactly. Exactly >> with everything that is attached to it >> but there is no certificate marriage certificate to prove us wrong.

[00:26:02]>> Don't show just show us the title of that certificate.

[00:26:08]This is the mar you are in a hurry to ask a question for argument.

[00:26:29]storage. Will you not will you be quiet?

[00:26:32]I thought you said that you you are very argument discussion.

[00:26:40]Why are you interjecting?

[00:26:42]If you want people to know the truth, stop the heckling. Let's just go to the You can't force me to answer something I don't want to answer.

[00:26:52]proven wrong with you can bring what you have.

[00:27:00]I'm not addressing you. I'm addressing please.

[00:27:03]>> So, so but you were interjecting what I'm saying. You didn't do that when your guy was speaking. The guy you saw, >> I did not interate you.

[00:27:11]I never said storage.

[00:27:21]Okay.

[00:27:33]Okay. But I brought those just show us a glimpse of it. Don't show us. Listen questions from that's the question I brought here with I never came here with an issue of certificate I'm very careful when I'm speaking point over 800 people.

[00:28:26]Listen about something that was being discussed.

[00:28:40]No, I have to join.

[00:28:43]question. There is a particular guy because of some issues.

[00:29:00]Do you understand?

[00:29:07]Question about requirements.

[00:29:11]Surviving spouse, surviving, surviving.

[00:29:31]No document of search in the courty or I don't carry a certain It was to go for an early.

[00:30:02]So I put it in the public domain.

[00:30:20]And that is it.

[00:30:27]I came here to the court.

[00:30:44]Okay.

[00:30:50]question.

[00:31:00]Why?

[00:31:18]Sorry.

[00:31:21]Okay.

[00:31:47]I'm just asking um you made a comment say your friend is saying But I was asking say, haven't you thought about it? Say there could be an other way.

[00:32:15]Yeah, there could be other. Oh, no. But but yeshu also called trusted while he's alive.

[00:32:49]I'm mocking somebody or doing I'm saying there are so many ways to dissipate or to distribute your properties. You can do a property in the name of someone.

[00:33:01]>> Mhm.

[00:33:11]>> Nobody.

[00:33:14]Thank you. Thank you. That is all I I I I wanted you.

[00:33:21]>> So, thank you very much.

[00:33:25]>> No, no, no. I want to go. Please. I want I'll be down here. I'll be down here.

[00:33:41]Story story one second.

[00:33:44]story. One second.

[00:33:54]Public document.

[00:34:05]document of administration. I'm saying it here.

[00:34:33]Okay. Make ancal lawyer lawyer.

[00:35:37]Sorry.

[00:35:39]Okay.

[00:36:16]Tik Tok.

[00:36:34]But intellectuals, people with fact evidence.

[00:36:53]Say court Hey, documents.

[00:37:26]Already let me give you the preamble from there when some of the lawyers come back when we are talking of caveat is one to order 66 rule The moment it automatically operates as an injunction for 3 months 66 rule 11 sub 4 of CR 47 months.

[00:38:13]for 66 rule 1147.

[00:38:34]Number two, person one to artic 11. When a superior court gives an order, it overrites anything unless an appeal court overturn it by an appeal order.

[00:38:47]Not even a notice of appeal or an appeal proper can override that.

[00:38:56]The orders of my lady inferior. It cannot stand the test of time in court. did these two things. So when the lawyers come tell them to quote the orders, tell them to quote where they are getting their powers from in terms of conversation the CI47 which is being used to adjudicate mostly 66 rule 11 it shall be in force for 3 months. So it stops everything then you make an argument automatically goes off.

[00:40:00]So when the lawyers come tell them to quote where they are getting their source from Google C47.

[00:40:08]So, you can build on that and make the argument.

[00:40:29]20004 CI 47 order 66 11 caveat probate letter of administration CI 47AT When it comes to that interest because or that interest. Two Letters of administration.

[00:41:56]Letter of administration.

[00:42:20]officially part of the administrators.

[00:42:28]part of administrators.

[00:42:33]But Denise, Calvin.

[00:43:01]foreign.

[00:43:24]Because 18 years on their own.

[00:43:50]3 months.

[00:43:52]Months.

[00:43:57]3 months.

[00:44:02]But after months again Seven.

[00:44:20]Seven.

[00:44:39]months.

[00:44:53]Platform can be a benefit and it can be a point of disaster for people.

[00:45:13]Concert Tik Tok.

[00:45:37]state for now. So radiocapacity.

[00:46:05]Fore question.

[00:46:59]later on.

[00:47:08]Okay, sir. Alex, what she went to request for document because aquatic breaking news because from wherever Again questions.

[00:49:10]The same thing.

[00:49:21]There's nothing question just for learning purposes.

[00:49:49]Is there anything that cannot be disclosed?

[00:49:57]Because from me, from a lay man's point of view, is simply restrict can be placed on anything.

[00:50:23]I don't know if one word of the Yes. Yes.

[00:50:41]Storage. We all have the information say at least 14 days but in this case it's not always the case. No, that is for a will for a will it is mandatory but if it is any other thing like trust it can come out a year after will cannot come and challenge trust that the only outside the trust. Anything that is outside the trust. Let's assume central hill anybody can contend because we have agree died interstate interstate does not mean say he didn't make provision of how his properties should be shared and I say how they should who should manage and all that no it just means say whatever He didn't do that. So it means he died the only one of the reasons I don't think said this matter it's not something that is so humongous solution the fact apply for LA does not mean said the LA has been granted And even the LA is granted and I'm glad chosen took his time to explain today in the right direction.

[00:52:50]I'm not here to say once the person is for the truth I'm for it. The fact he explained of administration it's not even a question that one it is the law has specifically stated which percentage goes to who according to the law the only problem I had with him was So then yes, she she's contesting that and she's still standing by the fact say she is the only eligible wife of the late deal.

[00:53:48]I wish that's why I'm asking about the That is why there are so many questions about it.

[00:54:22]one or twobert.

[00:54:49]I'm type Traditional two There certific Finch.

[00:56:32]question or bank hospital.

[00:57:27]Interstate Interesting.

[00:57:45]18.75%.

[00:57:48]56.25%.

[00:57:52]12.5% 12.5%.

[00:57:58]The second one% 25% 25%.

[00:58:20]Now the last part 75% 12.5% 12.5% say I think for now.

[00:59:19]First one a year.

[00:59:25]Second one, November 28th.

[00:59:50]question.

[00:59:54]Hello.

[01:00:09]The reason shouldn't be confidential.

[01:00:14]public document. Why can't we see what is on the caveat?

[01:00:18]We want to see the reason for the caveat and why it was filed.

[01:00:22]One thing about I think it's in the hands of the judge to decide on that one.

[01:00:54]letter of administration.

[01:01:00]Fantastific I'm convinced what I said what I meant was that caveat we don't even need to know the context of the caveat it is >> please finish up sorry finish up >> yes so the context of the the caveat itself defines what the the what Whatever you are you are applying for no is in whether we know the context or not it is a cave that has been placed on proceeding with legalities concerning the matter in the court it does not conclude the case and then I I feel like we can all exercise theum in giving out our submission there somebody comment section I don't know I think from time the person is constantly insulting and and such words they are not healthy because see we will have life after this matter ignore ignore comment section now don't worry >> no no because she is doing she's the only platform We get submissions from both sides.

[01:02:47]Steamar.

[01:02:49]Okay. Black.

[01:02:53]Yes.

[01:03:00]Okay. I see. Okay.

[01:03:05]That's that's just what I wanted to see.

[01:03:09]Why?

[01:03:10]>> All right.

[01:03:11]>> I think I think my name was called about a question I asked. This was the contest of the question. Somebody here was questioning the wife for the status of in court. And so my question was that if Musha Saw gets the gets the right to to whether share, distribute, trans whatever it is, whatever term you give it, the properties of DL, what will be the status of the sharing of the properties if it will be a wife, then nothing else matters. And as it stands now if the properties if somebody else comes and is sharing the properties status is a wife and so the whole conversation of whether all these things doesn't matter. It doesn't it defiles any intellectual argument because in any case you disputing her as a wife you wait and go and challenge it in an appeal court until until you challenge it for the appeals court to make a a a different decision. the woman is a wife. Again, this is the this is the the point where I was trying to say that you didn't allow me because the whole point is that is saying that now let's look at the options of when they file a caveat when you go and amend your your your aid and come and come and address the the the caveat.

[01:04:43]You can choose to defend your position that no if I'm saying that I'm a son of dumba and I file a caveat right now do you think that they will go and amend their appeal and add me as a son or if anybody here you file as a wife of daddya do you think that they will go and amend this and come and say is a wife of dumba so there is a reason why they went to amend it and amending it and the lawyers were the ones who amended it and so whether they amended it because h they they were forced or they no they are mened because they knew and they admit and they accept that is a wife whether there is Jesus Christ in heaven who approved it and whatever it decided that they will not challenge the the the the caveat they decided that they will not leave the affidav like that and they will do the right thing by accepting and admitting that was a wife and so that was the the the direction my question was going to but anyway yuba never answers my question so I'm not surprised and I mean I'm even grateful that he answered one so thank You see what you have explained sir because the odor broni was not listed as a wife and the court say she's a wife I agree and you know they had to go back and amend that but you see Alex is saying something different only went to put the caveat say it should be the location should be changed or no was just location which is not the truth that is why it will be hard for me to accept something that Mr. Alex is saying I'm sorry but I mean >> no I I I think you are missing two points. You are missing two points. Alex and I are actually on different tangents. Mine doesn't relate to what Alex said.

[01:06:39]The point was that I am just addressing Alexa.

[01:06:44]Okay. Okay.

[01:07:01]Few reasons.

[01:07:11]Changing location.

[01:07:15]What was the verdict?

[01:07:18]What was the verdict?

[01:07:21]The first What was the judgment?

[01:07:36]You understand where he's going?

[01:07:48]Yes.

[01:07:56]Mhm.

[01:08:02]Headquarters.

[01:08:22]Okay.

[01:08:25]Okay.

[01:08:36]Yes.

[01:08:41]Because first decision that was was decided by Monday. Okay.

[01:09:23]Okay.

[01:09:26]I have a question.

[01:09:33]Let's move forward along the court.

[01:10:05]Sorry, I stand to differ because very objective in my thought.

[01:10:22]I stand to def location on the whole day.

[01:10:47]Yes.

[01:10:49]Mhm. location.

[01:10:53]Mhm.

[01:11:20]Typical example.

[01:11:28]Celebration of life.

[01:11:31]Celebration of life.

[01:11:34]25th.

[01:11:45]10 pages document.

[01:11:52]Okay.

[01:12:00]Yes. lawyers.

[01:12:24]So that It's too early.

[01:12:50]Yeah. I'm just making like you are saying judgment before judgment. What was it?

[01:12:56]Judgement.

[01:13:03]Yes.

[01:13:04]>> Here's the case. There has been judgment on Monday.

[01:13:20]until telephone record telephone platform.

[01:14:09]Anybody who want to read let me go to my question.

[01:14:30]First of all, the first amendment wife there was an interment.

[01:14:52]Now my question is in that letter the name surviv amendment again as now the same that is my question I'll be very grateful or any other person any other amendment the same amendment for letters of administration that's my question >> okay question some of Until then, let me run commentary on that question.

[01:16:04]>> Oh yeah.

[01:16:10]As we are all learning at a point in time went there for letters of administration on her own.

[01:16:29]amendment of the same with the same name at a point in time.

[01:16:37]She want to be out of this issue on record.

[01:16:43]And my point is has that LA been amendment amend again still the same as surviving son, daughter, child.

[01:17:00]Then finally, so has there any amendment again?

[01:17:21]Which one is the character?

[01:17:34]which means people are telling a lie.

[01:17:39]That's what he's trying to say.

[01:17:44]the same.

[01:17:57]We have a long way to go.

[01:18:07]Number two, I feel You can't just address just one piece of the whole Kat.

[01:19:02]We have a stand and our stand is coming to Trust me.

[01:19:23]I'm confused as you are. I'm confused as you are.

[01:19:34]FY video like YouTube location from parking canyon.

[01:20:19]It's been ongoing to have been an amendment of amendment to where they are on Monday from what I gathered from wherever I listen to now all of a sudden only one judge will just sit location.

[01:20:53]I'm trying to address available.

[01:21:30]The difference that You know it doesn't make sense.

[01:21:45]It makes it sense.

[01:21:50]It makes a lot of sense. Believing see what is believing. What is believe? You read to believe man.

[01:22:04]We are waiting for the document to read.

[01:22:06]>> You need to convince me further.

[01:22:10]>> We want to read. We don't want to listen. At least one of the things that one of the falsehoods that I want us to all understand say it cannot be correct and it is not correct is that the caveat whatever it is whether it was blown away, fried away if shredded away whatever it is on the >> whatever it was not on the condition that Brun is not a wife see some of these matters >> that people don't condition the status what they say she did not there was some proof she did not file So is it based on a certain group? I mean yeah but not the status has already come out.

[01:23:22]That is what she said. He said he said that's what he said. problem is the wife is being questioned and that is why I was doing the questionify question.

[01:23:56]Oh, I know. I know what he said and I've also recorded it, please. But what I'm trying to say is okay. So does it mean Yes.

[01:24:52]The status of was repeated multiple times of marriage.

[01:25:11]Selective hearing.

[01:25:17]Sister was one thing.

[01:25:37]I wrote it down. I wrote it.

[01:25:41]I have it here.

[01:25:44]because my sister in fact the only people who can file a caveat is a wife um children and other people and say so even if even if her her caveat has been thrown out what does it mean because if one wife has been accepted and the other hasn't been accepted I I wrote all those ones down >> I have my which son or Canada is wrong. But understand because he never said that. He never said that.

[01:26:26]>> Thank you. He never said that.

[01:26:36]Listen, listen to his words.

[01:26:39]His words his words are like He see DNA crime is pending.

[01:26:59]Seriously in fact the status of of one of the children will be challenged. No, he's a father of all this propagation.

[01:27:40]I don't I don't think it mean I don't think so don't say it here because Hey YouTube law, the substantive right of a person, Right. It does not operate in a somebody's infringing on your right. You will not if you don't go through the process your your your your application will be thrown out. It doesn't mean that the right you are not the rightful owner. It doesn't mean that the law doesn't protect you. There are procedural issues. Let's just assume it is it is hollow. It it doesn't even make it doesn't even hold any value because you can be a wife with a certificate. Yes, you are a wife with a certificate.

[01:29:25]status.

[01:29:39]I will send it to you because you know It's based on the status wife. He even went deeper to say that is not a wife.

[01:30:38]one of nothing like that happens. It means He showed the document that he didn't showcase.

[01:31:20]I have question differences at least you should have given yourself a bit of time to certain information.

[01:31:46]But here were you able to >> No, no. Listen, listen. The guy shared his screen.

[01:32:06]There were a portion red that was that was the second part was the reason why the clip was thrown out.

[01:32:22]>> Okay. Okay.

[01:32:36]And I'm doing it once and for all.

[01:32:42]You see what some of you are doing is very diabolical. And you can't force me to say what I don't want to see.

[01:33:10]Do you know my reasons why I'm saying that?

[01:33:17]I read what the law said based on the question I was asked concerning the requirements for early what did you hear was I not answering a question was I not answering a question in answering question the question when you were asked the question your >> what question was I asked the question maybe this will be the last time no no maybe this will be the last time I'll come see why I told you That is what he does.

[01:34:18]question.

[01:34:21]Let me tell you Lord.

[01:34:32]Different view. Different view.

[01:34:57]I don't see whoever A portion of the document.

[01:35:40]Because baby daddy, I made it media person for the voiceless.

[01:36:17]That was mine. You can quote me anywhere and you can ask anywhere.

[01:36:30]How many times? Just three times.

[01:36:43]online.

[01:37:01]What are you talking about? Why will I come and lie for what?

[01:37:11]I don't want to go there. Hey boss questions of administration Requirement surviving wife.

[01:37:52]I don't want to go there.

[01:37:54]I know why I'm saying what I'm saying.

[01:37:56]I'm saying these things because I know what I am experiencing because do you understand? I'm being cautious of the things I want to say. Don't sit here and say things I have not said. I didn't come here categorically to come and speak about anybody's marriage status.

[01:38:25]Certificate.

[01:38:58]That is what I said. Don't misquote me.

[01:39:06]That is never what you said.

[01:39:24]Open documents. They are open to the registry. I said it when you write to the registry note of the day.

[01:39:36]I said it suit number. I said all those things here.

[01:39:52]That's not cool.

[01:39:55]>> So when we were talking, I said when you are going to court, you go to court based on status.

[01:40:18]video apart from I was explaining status. I was not explaining status based on the ladies.

[01:40:36]No, I spoke about status based on who is going to court to claim what.

[01:41:00]This is what story.

[01:41:21]Anybody should play it.

[01:41:34]I said that I This is what I said. I don't know why you're not finish four categories.

[01:42:19]wife.

[01:42:21]Yes.

[01:42:25]There's question mark on your status.

[01:42:28]>> Okay. So, hold on. So, Smith holding on. Hold on.

[01:42:38]I brought up I brought up I brought up this conver I brought up this conversation when and I was tell my question was going to be that made session stated categorically clear say if her status as a wife and the court threw her out threw the caveat out this way and so in that in that way cannot be a wife and I said I was question.

[01:43:25]Sorry, give me a minute.

[01:43:30]Started by explaining who can who can file a caveat.

[01:43:34]Say Brun a caveat in her capacity as a wife.

[01:43:59]This is I never said that. Let me finish.

[01:44:22]You're not allowed.

[01:44:47]Let me finish. where I said >> I don't have an audio. Let me let me have an audio.

[01:44:57]Don't do that.

[01:44:59]I don't appate.

[01:45:11]Why can't we move on? Why would they make Let me make my point.

[01:45:20]cancel.

[01:45:39]We should move on.

[01:45:44]back and forth.

[01:45:50]I brought up this I brought up this this whole thing back and I wrote it down. I wrote what let me move on for the respect I have for you. This was this was what I heard by somebody. The person say the person say went to court in her capacity.

[01:46:19]What does it mean to the status of the other wife? This was the comment and I wrote it down and I came back to you said I'm not addressing you addressing yourself.

[01:46:45]You know you can't warn me. Allow me to make my make my point my point. I did not call your name. I said let me make my point.

[01:46:53]I couldn't tell you what to say. Don't tell me what to say. You know, you can't tell me what to say.

[01:47:03]You can't tell me what to say.

[01:47:24]That's the thing.

[01:47:35]Move on.

[01:47:48]Sometimes going forward on your platform is a platform of records.

[01:48:05]It is on record.

[01:48:10]There has been a judgment.

[01:48:25]Butrivriv status.

[01:48:53]qualified certific Go beyond every reason.

[01:49:39]number one. Number two, it stands on record level of marriage status.

[01:49:56]wife step ahead. It is never true in all records as far as court is concerned.

[01:50:24]until proven otherwise then I will admit it. But for now, Otherwise, sorry.

[01:51:19]The content of the content of the reason to everyone.

[01:51:55]It is on record.

[01:52:12]I know.

[01:52:44]two, three times.

[01:52:50]So first Amen.

[01:53:37]Question question.

[01:53:43]Is it from the 2K?

[01:53:56]But there but Welcome.

[01:54:16]We are on different If you want to buy First question. First question.

[01:55:35]what he knows because you should fall into those four categories. Wife, children, parents and successor fall into and all those are to show your status.

[01:55:50]Now to him say promise she will go on his status as a wife.

[01:56:09]Listen, listen.

[01:56:32]You see, so the conversation came from Listen, listen, listen.

[01:56:43]First one because I know I know this.

[01:57:03]My next question is if you listen to him attentively, even because because because story.

[01:58:13]I didn't know that. I didn't know that.

[01:58:26]I'll speak it irrespective of who is in you are one person you can send all the all the all the documents all right >> I don't need it I don't need it I don't need you to send it to me what I'm saying what ahead question.

[01:58:58]No, no, no.

[01:59:01]I I wonder I wonder.

[01:59:06]You have people here from asking even question, normal questions.

[01:59:27]research that police document document No, no, listen.

[02:00:10]100%.

[02:00:14]Yes.

[02:00:17]Make my submission because You know the repercussion.

[02:00:48]Because a lot of people dangerous%.

[02:01:12]I believe it.

[02:01:16]People are worried.

[02:01:34]What has happened?

[02:01:42]What is the problem?

[02:01:46]Whatever you think of as it stands now.

[02:01:49]As it stands now, Now whatever the honest now will lie on instructions.

[02:02:25]Respect that in the 80s oversee the distribution of husband property.

[02:02:34]Who your contribution? Wow. Contribution.

[02:02:59]despite the earlier for you because it will come for five month time.

[02:03:38]in the 80s.

[02:03:49]GH all over the world.

[02:03:55]Yeah.

[02:04:11]Smart. It took everybody by surprise.

[02:04:15]hunt now.

[02:04:37]two or three month everything is in order. Everything because And she has every right to do that.

[02:05:09]Fine.

[02:05:20]What else can you do? Nothing.

[02:05:22]follow the right process.

[02:05:30]It doesn't mean it doesn't mean that because of everybody know that. So I don't know why people are trying to cry over this. Why?

[02:05:46]You all know that.

[02:05:59]It's against the law. What is the problem?

[02:06:03]People want to tell the woman what to do.

[02:06:16]You were nowhere to be found.

[02:06:19]cut them three years. Where were you guys?

[02:06:22]Where were you guys for three good years?

[02:06:32]What has happened?

[02:06:39]Some of you want to cry.

[02:06:53]Baby girl. Baby girl.

[02:06:57]Baby girl. Sister.

[02:07:03]You see no matter what people are know a fair game at the end.

[02:07:42]It's fair game. Whoever is interested in that why are people crying over this?

[02:08:03]Where social media, social media All right.

[02:08:51]The president BNC BNC BNC. Why?

[02:09:35]You can disagree.

[02:09:43]I love that.

[02:09:50]It shall surely come to pass.

[02:10:06]Now there How do you speak on records? Sometimes we are very credible in terms of your source.

[02:11:16]source I'm a trusting 101% TV. That's why One of the to be honest honey because sometime I always go and also learn something from them.

[02:11:55]Anyway, challenging the jurisdiction of the court.

[02:12:22]The only remaining that's what I question.

[02:12:34]Simple question.

[02:12:47]Yeah, neutral neutral neutral neutral.

[02:13:09]Okay.

[02:13:16]So, would you come here and apologize to us platform to platform Like that's what I want to know.

[02:13:50]>> There's no other than the two children of that standing.

[02:14:04]Alex says details because details I mean, I'll respect the decision of the court.

[02:14:54]understand only location.

[02:15:12]and try to say there is no caveat at the moment.

[02:15:39]There is no caveat.

[02:15:52]location.

[02:15:56]There is fight.

[02:16:10]Love.

[02:16:28]Yes.

[02:16:33]question.

[02:16:51]for I want because I know that law.

[02:17:51]A typical example document.

[02:18:03]original document.

[02:18:15]One second.

[02:18:27]You were able to provide the original?

[02:18:30]>> Yes, we have.

[02:18:31]>> Okay. In fact, more than original.

[02:18:33]>> Okay. So, evidence certific was wrong.

[02:19:04]>> Original marriage certificate was submitted at the court.

[02:19:09]I'm convinced but judge said they couldn't verify it. That's it.

[02:19:13]>> Okay.

[02:19:31]But I have listened to legal experts break it down.

[02:19:45]That's fair. That's fair.

[02:19:58]Because paragraph 107 107 106.

[02:20:31]certificate. Whatever was presented to prove an ordinance marriage fake nothing was presented whatever was presented it's not admissible in court because it was not properly verified. It did not go through the right process.

[02:21:01]besides the lack of certification or authentication, the council was to bring the original underlying word the original for the court to site since the court was informed that there was an original and hold you.

[02:21:25]original. However, what was brought to the court was an extract from a family book and diary which the council admitted in open court.

[02:21:40]The document therefore could not be the original and its document uh its copy being exhibit B. Therefore, the extract cannot be a proof of civil marriage certificate between the prelimitive and the late deadla. The extract is significantly different from the document purportedly tended in evidence as the marriage certificate.

[02:22:04]>> Mr. Alex, can there be can there be an extract of what does not exist? Just verify that. Just tell me that.

[02:22:13]extract forge.

[02:22:24]It's an extract. Can there be an extract of what does not exist?

[02:22:30]>> An extract if there's an original, right?

[02:22:35]or say however what was brought to the court was an extract which the council for the plaintiff or lawyer admitted in court that the document could not be an original and its extract being exhibit B therefore the extract cannot be a proof of civil marriage between that lumba and the plaintiff >> so m you say this is what it doesn't make sense to me Because there doesn't make sense to me at all.

[02:23:07]>> Can there isn't an original?

[02:23:10]>> You know, you know if you have >> there cannot be an extract of what does not exist.

[02:23:15]>> There's only an extract when there is an original >> original thing is there can't be there can't be an extra original. But we are saying that if there is original of which you brought a photo of original to court, bring the original. That's it. I'm sure original I think I'm finding it to understand Alex prove that there's an original Alex extract.

[02:24:17]Was it an extract of the family book or the extract of the marriage certificate?

[02:24:25]>> The extract was a different document.

[02:24:27]>> Different document.

[02:24:30]certificate.

[02:24:38]Okay.

[02:24:42]Was it the extract of the family book of the marriage certificate? Mr. extract certificate certificate one translated version two institute of languages Another one.

[02:25:18]Another false document.

[02:25:26]Did you say false?

[02:25:28]>> Was your word false?

[02:25:30]>> Soft document.

[02:25:32]>> False.

[02:25:33]>> I think he's here to say now number four. Four.

[02:25:39]>> He's counting numbers. He's counting.

[02:25:41]Okay. Okay. Four.

[02:25:45]>> 1 2 3 4 document. First one, German mar certificate purportedly. Two translated version of the German language into English.

[02:26:03]Institute of languages. Three letter from German embassy. Number four document. Fourth document extract marriage certificate of German document. Number one, Mr. Mr. Alex, let's let's not be mischievous here. If there's an extract from the German consulate that proves that there is an existing marriager, what else did the judge need? because original she did not need an original marriage certificate to say that a marriage a legal marriage exists. So everything just sounds very malicious. It doesn't make sense.

[02:27:13]>> The woman went to court to prove that there is an existing ordinance marriage.

[02:27:20]Period.

[02:27:22]all that needed to be she's not processing any documents then translate it to Ghana there for all that it was not necessary the woman was proving that if there a German consulate who acts like a president of Germany in Ghana certifies that there is an ordinance marriage that means he said that judgment was judgment so German consulate there's an existing ordinance marriage period.

[02:28:16]What was the content of the letter?

[02:28:24]from what brought we all support what mom brought to the court. It was a photocopy of an original mar certificate. Photocopy letter from the consulate. No, let's take it one after the other.

[02:29:06]Say Mr. before I mean clear the photocopy of an original First time that means that means extract photoific One photo, two That is all.

[02:30:56]The marriage the the family book contains legal certificates right?

[02:31:02]>> No no it contains information of the family. Oh my certificate just information giving you that they marry on this day on that day at this place. Do you get it? So what had all I want to know is because letter from the consulate how is the judgment >> and and the judge Did the judge actually do her due diligence and verify which meant to say she said certificate letter from the German embassy to whom it may concern.

[02:32:38]said this is to confirm that according to the German civil law there there exist a valid marriage between Charles Kuosu and Akusa Sewa. The marriage was celebrated in 23rd on 23rd 1220 2020 204 in Bonheim Germany. It is a way certificate. I didn't say a certificate say it was a letter to whom it may concern.

[02:33:15]>> He was just he was just certify he was just saying say there is an ordinance marriage there is a marriage that exists an ordinance marriage that exists between these two individuals. So he it was just verifying say yes this is >> mommy but >> nobody said it was a certificate I did not say that saying that is patron evidence act 161 procedure thank you accept that yes said there was a marriage, a legal marriage.

[02:34:02]Proven fine systemification.

[02:34:20]What does it prove? It's an ordinance marriage, right?

[02:34:30]Besides the lack of certification and authentication, council was to bring the original certificate for the court to site and compare.

[02:34:39]>> Sight and compare.

[02:34:41]>> They did not have time. They did not have time to go through the whole process.

[02:34:53]>> Well, of course, he did not put it in the judgment because of course, you know, It is part of lawyer and lawyer say even the day before you know German you know their whole process is very cumbersome um okay for I don't know.

[02:35:40]It is now telling us that a consulate did send in a letter and verified. Yes, there's an existent read. you deny 93 of the paragraph. Let me state that the plaintiff should have attempted to certify the German marriage certificate and by that she could have tended in evidence such as an attempt being a letter written to the Ghana German embassy requesting for that certification.

[02:36:16]Are you are you reading from the letter letter?

[02:36:20]What are you reading right now?

[02:36:26]>> Well, just tell me. Please don't patronize me. Don't patronize me.

[02:36:33]Because Alex is not ready to tell the truth. So, I think we say back and forth. Um it has been going on for a while and to be honest most of um lawyers even in the past from um sorry what really went on let's not go back and forth over this this and let's Okay. But most of them, you know, at a point they came to realize there were two, you know, few mistakes.

[02:37:30]Let's let's not argue too much.

[02:37:34]Out of respect for you, no problem.

[02:37:43]We must also respect our courts, right?

[02:37:48]Embassy original marriage certificate.

[02:38:01]There's no ambiguity.

[02:38:06]Was it verifying or authenticated original marriage certificate? Right.

[02:38:16]>> We are moving one at a time. The original presentation of original.

[02:38:31]>> No matter the copy he takes there, he dares not. In fact, my friend dares not submit anything than the original. Why?

[02:38:38]Because he knows that this country they will not tolerate. If you take or if you get there and the counelor says, "H yes, young man, you're going to visit your wife." Says, "Okay, let me see your marriage case.

[02:38:50]He will not accept it. He will throw you out. He will refuse your visa and you can't you can't do anything." Now, let's go to the second point. Here's thing that like people must know. See, we also think that embassies that we think only saints and angels are working there. Let us understand that even um armies army army headquarters that are spies there are bad people there. Let's understand that those people also have a price. And so let's understand say a document if a document comes from a certain embassy or a certain department let's not take it as if say it overrides all our laws and all the procedures.

[02:39:36]Some people have are so connected that they can go somewhere and find documents that you may not be able to find.

[02:39:43]But Alex and other people have all those documents. It means that some people are well connected than others.

[02:39:52]police station he's so connected that you may think it's impossible for him to get it but he may get that thing that you may wonder how is it done and so please the point I'm trying to make see these documents the point is that the consulate writing doesn't make whatever the court is requesting for complete the consulate right as one layer in fact the consulate the certification is another layer and the process for which is transmitted is another layer and the court Make sure sir all these things are done to protect justice so that tomorrow if you your sister is your sister works at the German embassy or the Canadian embassy you cannot be able to go and because you have friends there you cannot go and get a marriage certificate when or get something certified and bring it to our court and come and and come and trample on somebody's justice.

[02:40:44]See some of the things that has been said here today. I'm very very surprised. Now the one of the things I wrote I wrote there that I didn't get opportunity which I'm so sad about. But let's let's proceed. It cannot be true that the marriage certificate was not like the caveat was not accepted because of doubt about marriage.

[02:41:09]We allowed it to go. I'm so hurt. And Smith also justify All those things some of these things is very troubling because no matter what happens interruption.

[02:41:51]Okay.

[02:42:02]You have to we have to move on.

[02:42:07]I wrote a certificate. There was a death certificate.

[02:42:12]Sorry.

[02:42:15]There was a death certificate that was shown here.

[02:42:19]COD that was shown here. And it was purported say the death the the the barrier location they they they tried to some people tried to play around with the barrier location let it be known say that barriers that death certificate it was generated many months before Lumba was buried and so the death certificate the fact that you write you you write something on the death certificate doesn't mean that that's that's exactly what happened and so if they they had planned to bury somebody at a core or whatever it and they didn't bury the person, they buried at another place. You need to find the current what I don't know if there's a current marriage certificate or something like that, but don't build a point on it as if people meant to to to um deceive other people about the the the location for the burial. No, if you look at this this whole process of Lumb's burial, it's gone through many processes. So if at the time they decided that they were going to bury them at a court and they use it for the marriage they use it for the death certificate and it has changed it is not it didn't change because people wanted to change we all know what happened there were a lot of issues and it also came up that had left instruction where he should be buried. So these are all things that today we allowed to we allowed it to pass that some of us could not get could not get um um um a bite at it. My last point instructions from lawyers what when the lawyers see that our client left us instructions first but let us also understand that instructions when a lawyer says that they've left instructions it can be many other things. There is no way that shows that if a lawyer say that left us instructions it means that it is a will completely.

[02:44:19]performance report. It could be the exercise books.

[02:44:27]It could be various test but not necessarily the child's report card.

[02:44:33]I don't know if makes sense. So the lawyer saying the the deceased man the allegent left instructions. It does not necessarily mean control. Now if if they left instructions, it should be it should be with the court. No, there's nothing that forces them to leave the instructions that the man did at the court. And it doesn't also mean that it is a will at the in fact my little reading while this whole conversation was going on me has shown me that the there are even other things that a person can do while the person dies quickly quickly quickly quickly. Oh quickly. Oh, too many tabs research inter interiv like and that gift interals that if well I read that it means that that tells me it could be instructions given like gifts that a person gives somebody like while they alive the person gives gives gives it to them while they alive and while I was doing my research it tells me that while a person is alive all these things no while I was alive I like I've given it I give it as gift and just tell them that tell the lawyer say I've given this gift to baby I've given it to and there are documents to it documents to show while I was alive immediately I this thing I have my instructions are that it was a gift I gave to and so the lawyers know and all of this these are not things that they go and lod in if that left something like this instruction you don't expect them to go and put it in a court that's not what happens and so if anybody comes here and says so the lawyer said that they've left them instructions and So technically they have to go and leave it at a at a court.

[02:46:42]If there is something like that, if the lawyers said that they've let instructions, it must necessarily be a will. But if you read details deeply, you realize that no, it is not necessarily a will. And they are lawyers. If they wanted to say a a will, they could have said a will. That's what they said instructions. So don't force the lawyers or don't quote them blindly and say that because they said instructions, it's automatically a Manuel see case was thrown out because she was her status of her wife could not be ascertained or was thrown out because she's she she applied on the status of as a wife and so if she's thrown out it could mean that her wife her wife status is being challenged let's understand who it does not exist like that even if it's like that at the in the law court of Ghana the fact that you have a right doesn't mean that if you don't follow procedure you will not be thrown out example, you can be a you can have a right to something. It doesn't mean that if you don't follow the procedure in court, you your your right will still be given you on a on a No, you can own something. The thing is yours, the the money at the bank is yours. You are claiming it. All right. If you don't follow the right legal processes in your in your court case, the thing will be denied you. Not because it's not you are not the good person, not because you're not the rightful owner, but because you didn't follow the procedure. And so if anybody tells you that somebody was thrown out because of the of the status, there could be many other things and this is one of the reasons I've given. It could be generally procedural. I'm not saying I know but I just want to put this across so that everybody clears their mind that you cannot be thrown out just simply because you a wife and the fact that you thrown out it means you're no longer a wife. No, it could be procedural. It could be other matters.

[02:48:26]So, thank you very much.

[02:48:40]trusty lawyers. the instruction.

[02:48:59]How would people even take it?

[02:49:12]Confusion is just too much. But and this very simple and it's just a matter of time.

[02:49:20]>> Okay. Um um enter.

[02:49:29]Okay. Okay. Interview can a person go file an early with the inter view.

[02:49:43]>> Oh yeah.

[02:50:00]All those are gifts.

[02:50:02]What?

[02:50:11]Those are all things.

[02:50:32]Those are all things that is something. Was it something written or you know any kind of record? Does it have any records with the >> interviews? It will definitely have records. It will it will definitely have records. Yeah, it will definitely have records. Of course, he will definitely have some records that okay, this man said that while he was alive, he gave he gave the house and he's changed the ownership for this person. He's changed this for this person. And we are witnesses that he said this and he wants everybody in the family to know that That is an instruction.

[02:51:14]So this can all be instructions as in how someone has left behind.

[02:51:25]And in fact, even as of yesterday night when I was sleeping, I thought it could be a whale. Why? If there's a whale, why? But if you look at it technically, the lawyers never said a will. And they could have said a will if they wanted to say a will. You understand? And again I stand to be corrected but they could have said we have in our custody a will nothing stops them. But if they say instructions it means that they left them something like that. So let's give it some time. And um just to add a letter it can also be in audio form. It can be in a video form. It can also be in a written form. You understand?

[02:52:00]>> Okay.

[02:52:02]Um I think >> can I clear something please?

[02:52:07]>> Oh okay.

[02:52:08]>> Um I know a lot of wor so many years.

[02:52:15]I can say it on authority that daddy Lumba left trust left written well left video. Well I can say it of authority.

[02:52:29]You can record this and mark my words.

[02:52:32]It will come out. Okay.

[02:52:37]Okay.

[02:52:39]The reason why I came here >> I think you're breaking I think you are breaking up.

[02:52:46]>> Yeah.

[02:52:47]>> Okay.

[02:52:49]>> From Lord. Okay.

[02:52:50]>> It's from Lord.

[02:53:07]social media just throwing dust into people's very credible. Let the person provide evidence.

[02:53:23]evidence with evidence.

[02:53:43]I mean, where are we going?

[02:53:46]We should show respect to these people.

[02:53:49]We should not just take things for granted and then go around page to page and then behaving like we know that we don't know.

[02:54:01]I am saying it say I know him. I know her personally.

[02:54:10]I know her personally.

[02:54:13]I know her personally.

[02:54:26]People call themselves lawyers on social media. That's when you check their background.

[02:54:33]It doesn't make you a lawyer because so it doesn't make you a lawyer to come on social media and then doing some arguments and you don't know anything about it.

[02:54:46]How long does it take for a person to provide a marriage certificate? How long? But people still believe there is a marriage certificate.

[02:54:56]How long does it I mean how long will it take for somebody to go through this procedure? It's just 2 3 4 days all this procedure will be done.

[02:55:09]Why is it that this thing is still not provided and I say we have not seen it but people go on social media claiming that this is there this is that this is I mean what are we doing to ourselves?

[02:55:22]Why do we want to disgrace some family like that? Because of the gains, the little gains that we will get. So we will get up and go one place from one place to another and then saying things.

[02:55:47]Let me go and check something and then come back.

[02:55:51]I don't want to mention this guy's name but go to see document immediately there will be a written somewhere you will get it. You are saying you move from court to court. Where is that document that shows say this thing has happened? Where is the document?

[02:56:27]But you go around saying things that you don't know. Please please me particularly the way things are going about this family. Seriously.

[02:56:46]No.

[02:56:50]From now on, let the person prove with the document including social media. They think they loud.

[02:57:32]When you meet me personally, I didn't have I call your name have I call your name call your name but you are lying on all platform tell me the lies are lying How long does it take?

[02:58:36]Most prove in the case of Even has been filed long time ago. And then now most of the time platform.

[02:59:38]In fact, Now for now go ahead.

[03:00:26]Most questions willing Okay.

[03:01:00]For now for now.

[03:01:07]This is the case living in suspense.

[03:01:34]Fantastic. But the problem is You put the person on board.

[03:02:16]Most information most times out. Why? Because because of that.

[03:02:43]However, This is what we do here.

[03:03:10]issue people or this family I mean respect it's like procedurement I register.

[03:03:59]What stops you to go to the regist to get a copy?

[03:04:07]Ghana. So you is very difficult for you to get such documents. Well, but Moving forward.

[03:04:54]Lord, Lord.

[03:05:01]It seems more confused.

[03:05:21]Okay.

[03:05:33]Which is like very good statement.

[03:05:37]Okay.

[03:05:43]unproof evidence with authority kind of auth Moreover, how long? How long does it take?

[03:06:06]How long does it take?

[03:06:19]Hypocrisch.

[03:06:48]I'm supported questions.

[03:07:05]document.

[03:07:26]This is the ruling in this case.

[03:07:34]Mr. That is not the case.

[03:08:07]Lord is statement.

[03:08:30]Honestly, I'm not going to believe anybody unless you have the right you have the right to say so.

[03:08:47]>> Yeah. Because it seems they getting they are getting everybody confused.

[03:08:59]long wouldn't No no unless unless you asking a question please. Oh yeah, sure.

[03:10:02]3 hours.

[03:10:15]Okay.

[03:10:19]Okay.

[03:10:28]Lord Hello.

[03:11:01]because I don't like it when I don't like it when when a guest come and I don't You know, sometimes Sometimes minim audience.

[03:12:14]What am I saying?

[03:12:33]question.

[03:12:45]Okay.

[03:12:57]Exactly.

[03:13:12]But then question platform.

[03:13:53]Okay.

[03:14:09]different because people are playing with our mind honestly both sides people are playing with our mind and if you don't take Because this could have been just something simple.

[03:14:45]It seem like two parties everybody is playing with our mind because of the technicalities of I will push you with a lot of questions which maybe I just want to know you can read and write when you coming to tell us something I can read and write and understand but I I don't have time for certain things But here is the case. Knock out.

[03:15:55]You can believe it or not.

[03:16:08]But still, It's on record.

[03:16:49]Exactly.

[03:17:12]as I'm speaking now with because But I must sound different.

[03:17:48]I'm going straight.

[03:17:51]I will tell you point blank.

[03:18:02]today. That is my problem.

[03:18:17]But as somebody Yes.

[03:19:02]I don't just get it.

[03:19:18]like how long certificity like I'm Gucci.

[03:19:43]Okay.

[03:20:01]misleading judicial system and all misinforming the entire Ghanaians.

[03:20:09]I believe the judicial system should take such people on We are challenging the judicial system in Ghana. Moving forward information from court from legal perspective misleading misinformation you're charging with damages again.

[03:21:07]The criminal offenses act Fine.

[03:21:35]We will treat it legally. Some of us we are challenging the judicial system in Ghana.

[03:21:55]That is not what we looking for.

[03:31:00]But it's what is good for the goods is also good for the Ganda.

[03:31:32]evidence.

[03:31:42]platforms. They have freedom to question.

[03:31:55]Sorry.

[03:32:12]The same father to ask evidence to that effect.

[03:32:37]One promin.

[03:33:05]It doesn't mean the people out there listen you can be playing with their intelligence because the same.

[03:33:30]How many times means he's been going hovering from one place to the other.

[03:33:49]But he want us to believe something happened in Germany.

[03:34:05]I am questioning and I'm giving you evidences in to the point and he's giving us this narration.

[03:34:59]because to the point and I'm going to give you the He could not perform with say, "Hey, you know, he's not feeling all that well." And say, Uhhuh.

[03:36:31]I am putting it.

[03:37:01]lawyer Because the same killing off.

[03:37:41]provide every Which judgement? Because there've been several court cases because there've been several court.

[03:38:25]Why? Let's respect him.

[03:38:29]Gujihi.

[03:38:42]Yes sir. Yes sir.

[03:38:52]Are you right?

[03:38:57]part of baby.

[03:39:17]No question.

[03:39:35]attacking number so many for the where I record.

[03:40:23]Maybe question.

[03:41:00]Mhm.

[03:41:21]On what basis Very good.

[03:42:06]100%.

[03:42:13]I have not seen that.

[03:42:17]Have you seen it or not?

[03:42:19]>> No, I have not document. No, I have not.

[03:42:22]>> Okay. All right. Let me let me let me ask this question.

[03:42:30]Well, grandfather single and grandma come around.

[03:42:45]Okay, when based I know.

[03:43:37]Because record.

[03:44:16]Oh, why not? Everything that we you say is subject to scrutiny. Yeah, it's subject to subject to scrutiny.

[03:44:36]Exactly.

[03:44:54]Ah. or see backstage hospital. Oh, hey.

[03:45:37]Okay. Listen, it's been a couple of weeks now.

[03:45:44]point of seech.

[03:46:12]Reply.

[03:46:29]Was it not the main point?

[03:46:36]Mute yourself.

[03:46:45]or can different platform next. Yeah.

[03:47:08]They've all confirmed the main point.

[03:47:31]Maybe I question one question.

[03:47:46]ruling about.

[03:47:49]Do you know sir?

[03:47:59]Do you know that?

[03:48:00]>> I know. I know that. Yeah.

[03:48:02]>> Okay. And do you know do you know copy of case? Do you know that?

[03:48:09]>> Well, I can I can attest to that.

[03:48:20]I hope you the ones you said you have and if you have read it if you compare to what Alles always what he shows does he contradict with what is on the or the one you have does he does he contradict So you are saying and I'm using that to ask you a question.

[03:49:12]Yeah, that's what you are right% You are right I start saying sayingward platform I can ask a question there.

[03:50:09]The only thing the only thing Alex No.

[03:50:47]No. No.

[03:51:10]I don't know difference.

[03:51:29]platform stadium. In fact, the whole world Bro, document Hey, credible source.

[03:52:40]Two things WhatsApp WhatsApp WhatsApp In any case, 12 I don't do personal. I'm talking from a source.

[03:53:37]I'm not putting words in his mouth. I'm very very critical in terms of house of records.

[03:53:49]My 12 days he has been going around.

[03:54:12]How can he say things?

[03:54:21]Yes.

[03:54:29]firstand experience in any case between >> any case in any case between the records are there for everybody to see. Where is it?

[03:55:17]In any case, Born Born away.

[03:56:03]Breaking newsuesday almost 2K GH.

[03:56:46]Amen.

[03:57:14]Parliament Fore balance questions.

[03:57:43]the validity of but the bottom line Is it necessary?

[03:58:13]Is it always necessary for you to be the first person to come out with information?

[03:58:21]Is it part of good ethics of journalism?

[03:58:23]Because a journalist, he is not a blogger. He is a journalist. Professionally, is it ethically correct for you to come out with information of which you don't have concrete evidence?

[03:58:40]If for nothing at all, what were the things that you jotted down at least similar to what the judgment will come will be like?

[03:58:52]intellectuals.

[03:59:03]Last segment See one time. Where you besides the best? What's the judgment of?

[04:00:37]Has it been established? No. Nobody.

[04:00:52]African aspect But he couldn't do that. But questions.

[04:01:42]They have equal chance of asking questions.

[04:01:46]Prepare yourself because you are moving from your comfort zone to another question.

[04:02:00]social Miss the platform social media platform.

[04:02:50]The parliament of all social media, Tik Tok parliament.

[04:03:07]Breaking news.

[04:03:15]Made a mistake.

[04:03:45]all these things.

[04:03:50]No, no, no. Don't do it, please.

[04:03:52]>> I know. I know the target speaking to it is not disrespect.

[04:03:57]>> No, but you make you you you attribute.

[04:04:07]Oh, come on. Come on.

[04:04:11]Anyway, you can say it means you are permitted to do it.

[04:04:29]Okay. Okay. I I'll use that one.

[04:04:33]Okay.

[04:04:34]All right.

[04:04:42]The right way.

[04:05:00]They are very very vulnerable.

[04:05:16]I'm happy.

[04:05:32]Sure.

[04:06:00]Because Build platforms.

[04:06:30]Parliament House of Records document come and prove it.

[04:06:49]fact comes with evidence. Next question.

[04:07:10]Good.

[04:07:41]So um I want to find out what have you learned so far when it come to um with relation to this Lumba court case anal alumba issue. See what have you learned so far uh with this Noa issue say with this issue um what have you learned so far?

[04:08:12]>> Yeah. Yeah.

[04:08:14]So far with this what have I learned?

[04:08:17]>> Yes.

[04:08:18]>> All right. All right. Okay. All right.

[04:08:20]Thank you very much.

[04:08:22]With regards to this issue, there are so many things that I've learned in this issue, but I will for time sake I'll just speak one or two. Do you know what one thing I've realized is that truth can never be hidden.

[04:08:39]Truth can never be hidden. And then the second thing that will establish here is that it is always good or right to listen or to pay attention from the right source of information because this social media determination of information distorted information.

[04:09:10]So if you don't get credible source, don't believe it. Especially those without documents, you don't need to follow those people at all. That is what I can just put across for now.

[04:09:22]>> We just um my last follow-up question.

[04:09:25]Okay. So then what lessons have you also learned here? I mean on the past platform.

[04:09:32]>> Yeah.

[04:09:33]Adas platform is the h is a primus interar the greatest among his coals in fact this is one of the it is one with no size in the sense of not necessarily there's no social media app so far these two parties ever debating But on record, nobody can establish.

[04:10:12]>> I can establish. I can establish.

[04:10:15]>> All right. That's your That's your opinion. And your opinion is just insignificant because it's 0.0000. It has no decimal point for us.

[04:10:24]Nobody and I mean nobody can establish one fashion.

[04:10:33]>> Well, it has established and confirm all Tik Tok apps at every given based on availability of the people.

[04:11:03]Disadvantages One of the credible things One of them platformated.

[04:12:14]Okay, that's it.

[04:12:27]America.

[04:12:57]for case.

[04:13:32]Please challenge. Would you be a leader?

[04:14:18]Because More than That group.

[04:14:59]Okay. Okay.

[04:15:19]mobile longers.

[04:15:56]Different way.

[04:16:45]Yes No, no, no, no, no. There's no way.

[04:17:28]hatred forch.

[04:18:11]20room.

[04:18:31]problem.

[04:18:33]I take his side.

[04:18:45]Fore!

[04:19:00]Foreign! Foreign!

[04:19:24]Ed cruise control. Everything is going smooth.

[04:19:33]Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Foreign speech.

[04:19:59]for any support.

[04:21:16]many years.

[04:21:24]50 times.

[04:21:35]Okay. Social support.

[04:22:19]H papa platform.

[04:22:57]But I just I just know how to keep my spirituality clean.

[04:23:14]screen recorders.

[04:23:16]>> Mhm.

[04:23:18]>> 2020, >> right?

[04:23:31]>> Wow.

[04:23:33]Wow.

[04:23:37]pictures to see everything.

[04:23:40]>> Okay.

[04:23:49]Right.

[04:24:01]Right.

[04:24:13]There is no a whole lot.

[04:24:42]I'm hungry.

[04:24:43]>> Right.

[04:24:47]>> Right.

[04:24:56]To be on the list, >> right?

[04:25:11]That was last two months. That's right.

[04:25:38]I don't want to cry.

[04:25:43]Wow, this is deep.

[04:25:51]Wow.

[04:26:08]Mhm.

[04:26:19]Okay.

[04:26:24]2000 prayer.

[04:26:53]How many last food?

[04:27:18]Right.

[04:27:22]Right.

[04:27:25]>> Last two weeks >> by Friday.

[04:27:49]Okay.

[04:27:54]I don't know anything.

[04:28:08]This is transparent.

[04:28:16]Okay. Okay.

[04:28:30]Sunday at Toronto General Hospital. Okay.

[04:28:37]Are you there?

[04:28:46]Because unexpected.

[04:29:03]I'm so shocked.

[04:29:14]3:00. So, I shouldn't eat.

[04:29:27]Wow.

[04:29:29]Wow.

[04:29:34]Wow.

[04:29:38]>> Wow. This is powerful. This is My sister WhatsApp Amen. What?

[04:30:43]Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Foreign speech.

[04:31:06]Amen.

[04:31:22]Yeah.

[04:31:37]We just My name is That's what for you.

[04:32:50]Okay.

[04:32:54]God is great.

[04:33:03]Trans Also bow your head down in shame.

[04:33:40]This is coming from light.

[04:33:54]First lady transplant. Correct.

[04:34:46]genuine reason. This is so genuine kidney transplant in one way or the other.

[04:35:10]Man must think.

[04:35:28]It is only fine.

[04:35:58]Next project will be underf I mean, we all trying to do I mean, I know line Hello.

[04:37:03]>> Hello. Oh, Debbie, unmute