This video mistakes the iterative refinement of historical data for a grand conspiracy, trading academic rigor for sensationalist revisionism. It weaponizes the limitations of DNA testing to fuel a narrative that prioritizes provocative skepticism over verifiable archival truth.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Why Do The Slave Trade Numbers Keep Changing? What Are They Hiding?Added:
OCO freethinkers.
I make you think. I make you think. Who going to tell them? Baby, I'll tell you. You know that Ancestry DNA back in 2007, they actually changed their test. Why?
Because the Afroindigenous, the copper color indigenous people that look like me here in America, y'all call us black Americans, Africanameans. Yeah.
Guess what? Our DNA came back as a part of the eaplo group. You know who the e-haplo group is?
>> The house of Israel. We Hebrew, baby.
Then whenever you decide to do your research, your man >> the ancient Hebrews are the American Indians. So why would you recommend for entertainment purposes only? I literally called those company.
>> All right, hold on. I'm not going to agree with with everybody's everybody's take I'm not going to always agree with.
Okay. I'm just not There's going to be some people out there who have their own religious organizations that they gravitate to. They want to insert that into the teachings of the American Indians.
>> Three of me because I myself wanted to start my own test. And that's when I discovered that it's for entertainment purposes only. So no, I don't agree with you. I do not recommend any DNA test. I do however recommend do your genealogy.
>> So, >> okay. All right. So, really quick, yes, I highly recommend that you do your own genealogy. And that does not mean that you take a DNA test. Doing your genealogy consists of doing uh a paper trail, like you're actually conducting research on your family members to see exactly what happened with them between now and on back. Okay. See exactly what happened with them. It could be your mothers of your mother's father, mothers of fathers. Okay. Because each generation is multiplied by four. Got two grandmothers, two grandfathers. So you need to find out what happened on both sides of the family authentically.
And no some swab of the mouth or some you know untransparent move or whatever way they're taking the saliva to test it to see your entire historical genetic makeup of years of your bloodline. They can't do that.
That's impossible. So you Yeah. The best way to do it is to grab the paperwork to see what was documented. Okay? And you don't just have to stick with mothers and fathers. You could do the nieces, nephews, you could do the aunts, the uncles, you could do the cousins. You do it all and see exactly what happened and see exactly what happened. But that's genealogy. That is the proper way to do genealogy, not some DNA test. We we went over this numerous times. DNA test is totally different. And that's true. what she said that it is for entertainment purposes only because for that reason uh the reason why that that is said is because they can't tell you your historical genetic makeup overall that is impossible. They would need to have swab the mouths of your deceased ancestors.
So they're only they're limited. They're only capable of comparing your data with other living people. And again, we already know that this is the reason why you could tell, you know, if you are the child of that, I mean, if you are the child's father or not, you know, by way of paternity uh DNA testing. That's it.
That's as far as it could go. Okay?
Those genealogy DNA tests are not coming back with names, dates, and locations.
They're just not. They're not coming back with names, dates, and locations.
They don't know who your people are. The only way you're going to know who your people are is if you do the footwork.
You do the research.
Can't be lazy. You got to get it done.
Ain't no if, answer, or but about it.
All right. Come on.
>> Can we celebrate? You say, "What are we celebrating?" Can we celebrate the fact that uh we now know that we are the indigenous? And some of us knew a long time ago. I've been known for about 10 years. But can we just celebrate that? I know there's a lot of evil going on in the world. And I know we have not gotten our land back. I get all that. But we got to celebrate every win. We got to celebrate even the small wins, but this is a big ass win. We know that we are the indigenous. We know we didn't come over here on boats. We know that we civilized a nation.
>> Can we celebrate that? So, how should we celebrate? For every person that knows 100% and maybe you've known for a long time that you are the indigenous, can you just drop that comment? I am the indigenous to this land. Can we just write that to celebrate Black History Month? Because even though we're not black, even though we're not African-American, can we just celebrate I am >> indigenous is what she's saying.
>> I am indigenous to this land. Can we just write that in the comments? really from Africa, America would have never told you. I mean, what's the point of >> I's last name, taking mother away from daughter, taking son away from father, making sure they can't speak their language, making sure they don't know their culture. If you're just going to turn around and tell them the exact location where they're from in the first place, it just makes no sense.
What makes sense is telling them they're from somewhere else so they won't connect to their actual land and heritage and culture. Think about it.
Peace to the gods.
>> Mhm.
>> I agree with that.
>> They top.
>> I agree with that.
>> Hey, so do you guys want to see something wild and crazy? Kind of like a big fat lie. Yeah. So, you know how we've been learning that the transatlantic slave trade I'm going to read it from Google. The transatlantic slave trade was a 16th to 19th century maritime system that forcibly transported over 12.5 million African men, women, women, and children to the Americas for enslaved labor. You know how we learned that, right? Well, can somebody explain this? Because you know that was a business and all businesses track all their records, right? So, explain this.
>> I already explained this. This is one of my main points that I went viral on. I explained this very point right here.
>> So, because it's Black History Month, I wanted to do a little dig and then she going on slave voyages >> on slavevoyages.org.
Even on the main website, it says explore the voyages that relocated more than 12 million enslaved Africans across the world. Right. And we learned that most of them came to the Americas.
Correct. Okay, let's see.
So, I wanted to see voyages from Africa to the Americas specifically because 12 million, that's a lot of voyages. So, I wanted to see the dates and all the information. So, I went ahead and put vessel's departure, Africa. And as you can see, it adds several countries, all of the western countries. And then I put place where vessel's voyage ended. And I selected mainland North America. And of course, I'm expecting thousands of voyages, right? So, let's see. Surely the records are accurate because this was a business and a lot of money was spent.
>> No, they not even showing you the records.
Okay, keep in mind these are numbers that they put up on the website. They're not showing you any record, >> right?
>> Just note there.
>> Why is there only one voyage from Africa to the Americas in 1803?
One with a total of 109 embarked and 106 disembarked. That is way less than 12 million. And I know you're thinking, well, no, they brought them to the Caribbean and to Brazil. So, I did that filter as well. I changed the vessel's departure from Africa and places where the voyage ended. I selected mainland, North America, Caribbean, Spanish, mainland Americas, and Brazil. And I thought for sure I would see thousands of voyages.
And would you look at this? only two voyages from Africa to the Americas.
>> So I went to the side to do a sum total to see how many Africans came to the Americas.
And would you take a look at this?
Captives embarked 414.
Captives disembarked 48.
That is a hell of a lot less than 12.5 million. Not to mentions if >> I already broke this down.
I broke down that their numbers weren't the same and they kept changing them every five to Wait, no, no, they tried to change it every two years. Especially when this website came out. I checked them the first time they created this website and they were trying to say the 12.5 million. Then what year was that?
That was I think that was 2016 if I'm not mistaken. It was either 2016 or 17.
When I checked them the first go round, they changed their entire website. Like the whole website looked different. Uh they manipulated the numbers again. So it went from 12.5 to 30.
I'm trying to remember what was that number, y'all? Y'all remember the videos cuz I showed y'all. And they even um we had um Henry Lewis Gates Jr. on tape stating the number again. 90. No. 92.
92. 92. That's right. So 92,000.
That's it. 92,000 between the 1800. Correction. Between the 1600s and the 1500s and the 1800s.
Yeah. They were lying the entire time.
They were just making it up. There's no record of where they got this information from. They're not even telling you where they got this information from. They're telling you who helped create the information. Yeah.
300,000 then down to 92 uh,000. Yeah. So 12.5 million was their first number.
Yeah. Then at 300,000 number then the 92k. Yeah.
>> You actually see here captives embarked from American countries in mainland North America to other mainland North American countries in the Caribbeans.
You see the numbers are almost 10 times more drastic. You see that?
So that means just like Martin Luther King said, we were captives in our own land, right? Not this fictitious story that they made up saying the majority of us came from Africa when literally it was just a handful. So we can't let these people keep lying to us and keep giving us these false narratives when we have all of this potential to go online and look up this information for ourselves.
>> Again, again, they're just telling you the numbers. So, they've been changing it. Well, I think we're catching them every two years now. I believe that's the pattern. It seems like we're catching them every two years where they're changing the numbers. Either way, they're changing the numbers because they're not even showing us where they're getting these numbers from. So, they're not accurate. And it's too many times where they manipulating the numbers. They're not accurate.
They're changing the story as they go along.
>> Want to stay in the dark and be in La La Land, that's on you. But the truth is out there and it's time for this system to be exposed.
>> I agree with them.
>> Are the Aboriginal people of this land.
I had a great conversation. Y'all going to be mad, but even Google backed me up real quick. Even though you have to like bypass their narrative, but this is what we came up with. Many researchers and descendants point to the Aboriginal history of the Americas, noting that the original people encountered by early explorers were described as having dark skin and woolly hair long before the transatlantic trade. This person told that original identity, the people were already here and their physical traits, dark skin and specific hair textures were indigenous to this continent. reclassification trap. By calling these people mixed or African in the system, it effectively stole their indigenous identity. It allowed for the government to rebrand them as immigrants, inhabitants, or descendants of slaves to justify taking the land. Google even had to clock its own tea and say presence before the ice bridge. These Aboriginal communities were established in the Americas well before the period associated with the East Asian migration across the Bing Strait.
>> Bearing straight.
>> What you're telling me, Google, is that the people who say that they're Native Americans today, they came later, even after black people were still on the American land. Let's read a little.
>> No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
still on the Okay, he's right, but just listen. What? Just listen to what you're saying. What you just said is letting you know that we were already here. We were here. We didn't come from any other place. We were already here. We were already residing here. This is mama land. This is the motherland. This is grandma. Everybody else came from a different continent. Everybody else did.
We were already civilized. This is who they teach about. This is who they were referring to when they got here. They saw our people and we were many shades of the color brown. Okay? For example, in many of their older definitions from the 1800s and the 1700s, especially in the older dictionaries, they describe what American was. They described what Indian was at that time.
They were referring to our people of the East and West Indies. Not to be mistaken mistaken as the place that they call India today. It was east Godwana and west Goddana. East side of America, the west side of America. From looking up down though, from looking up down basically by way of what direction they see it. That's why if you look at the map right now, they calling those islands in the Caribbean islands west.
is because of where they were located.
Considering it west, because technically it will be us being the west and they will be in the east. If you're looking at it from a different angle, they would be east, we will be west because originally that's what it was called. We were called west Godana. Look that up.
West Godwana showing lands west. Think about that. We'll we'll get into that another time, but I'll bring it up again. But I just want that to be known cuz they be like, "Dang, what is that word that you talking about?" That was before pangia. That word was used a lot in Alangquin. That's an Algangquin term.
>> No further. The mix.
>> Alangquin is the language. That's another thing I got to get into. We got to get into the languages now on camera.
We going to talk about all this. We got some five live streams coming up. of razor terming these original people as having mixed heritage as if we're African and black Indian which is what our original classification was under the United States government because we were prisoners of war because there was a previous regime in place before the United States government. Keep that in mind. I wouldn't consider it a regime but it was a government already in place. I wouldn't consider it a regime because they were not in control of all the tribes because at that time you got to think about it was no such thing as nations at that time. It was no such thing as nations. So it wasn't like they were in charge of multiple different tribes but they did have the confederates that did exist.
>> Terming us to have heritage is an inac >> before the Confederate army way before the Confederate army.
narrative and is a tool of paper genocide which has already been committed more than 400 years ago >> used to strip them of their primary indigenous identity. So yes, if you are a black American, news for you, this is your land. Connect with the trees and connect with nature. The more that the divine supports you, the more that nothing can be able to come against us, especially when we act in accordance with God's will collectively. And hey Caribbeans, I have some news for you too. You might also be from the mainland islands like Jamaica, Haiti, and a lot of the Afroindo. According to this Oklahoma Eagle article, it says tens of millions of black Americans or rather Indians who disappeared after 1492 did not >> did not all die in the Holoca I wrote that. I wrote that. That's my article. I wrote that. That's my writing right there.
>> Holocaust.
>> Don't forget that I was writing articles before I went viral. inflicted within America. Every European nation that colonized North America utilized Ind.
>> This is this is the article that made me go viral now. Oklahoma eagle is borrowing it. But that came directly from me from my website. Yeah, they you know back then they was reposting it, reposting it. That's my article. That's my writing. I wrote that back in 2015.
>> Indian slaves. And if you know anything about black America, you would realize that Indian was originally our original classification. Yes, even people who had tight coiled hair, our original status in the United States regime was Indian.
Black Americans were reclassified and renamed over 230 times from plethora of names like American Indian, Afroindigenous, Indigenous American. Way more way more than that. I like where he at though. with where his mind at.
That's good. Okay. Keep going.
>> So when they say North America utilized Indian slaves, they're speaking about black Americans. Black Americans. Yeah.
For construction, plantations, and mining on North on the North American continent, but more frequently in their outpost in the Caribbean.
>> Caribbean.
>> See, I was already I was already on point with all of this research before I started putting it out in article format. I made myself a little old, didn't I? But anyway, that's a milestone because technically this was 11 years ago, man. I was talking about it then. I already knew where it needed to go, but then we start bumping heads with our next door neighbors. But they got to get something straight first so they can understand, yeah, we are the same people. This is the Americas, but y'all got to understand that y'all can't be playing around with us on when it come to respect.
Can't be playing around. Okay. um is is no we bow down now you got your culture from us you the majority of it was from us especially you living out here uh it's just a few things that got to get corrected then we'll be able to move forward >> with them but right now we shouldn't even worry about that just focus on us >> metropolis of Europe meaning that these Indians were taken from the mainland of America shipped all around the West Indies and to Europe back to Africa and back to America which would leave room for some Africans potentially to be in >> and that's true. It was only a few >> American slave transatlantic slave trade please >> because with that only being that few was no such thing as a slave trade if it was going to be that small amount that's not slave trading. That's not what this is about. But that's how you know it was more of them as slaves than us. That exposes the whole thing. So if it was way less of us as slaves and way more of them as slaves, then who slavery really affect? And the reason why they tried to take over to begin with because they were at the bottom and they were trying to put themselves at the top of the totem pole. And the only way for them to do that is to manipulate the mindsets of the people who were in charge. They pitted us against each other. That's the only reason why we're in this position right now. It's not the fact that this government was killing our people. The government was mentally controlling the people and they couldn't do it to the elders. They couldn't do it to the adults. They hadn't they had to make it mandatory to get to the vulnerable children. The slave trade was about kidnapping children. I know this already. Don't forget that. This ain't got nothing to do with adults. It was always directed at the children. They could be easily manipulated.
Unfortunately, y'all. Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened. So, y never told US HOW THEY DID IT. I always tell you how they did it. It's in it's even in their own writing. The Virginia statues at large. I showed you that.
It's in their own writing.
>> But the majority of the people, especially those that had worked on the main land are indigenous Americans, black indigenous Americans, Aboriginal people of the United States of America.
So if you are seeing this and you are re and you are feeling in your soul that yes this is my identity. This is your sign to connect with the divine connect with God. Connect with your nature and allow yourself to sit in your identity of someone who is literally native to the land that you are indigenous >> right now.
>> So the exact reason that >> he did good >> I post these videos talking about black indigenous Americans they in my comments right now coming for me. They got it.
>> OCO freethinkers.
>> I make you think. Yeah. I make you think. I make you think. Yeah. I make you think. Yeah. I made you think. Yeah.
I made you think. I make you think.
Yeah. I make you think. I make you think. Yeah. I make you think. I make you think. Yeah. I make you think. Yeah.
I made you think. Yeah. I made you think. I make you taste.
Callaway.
Related Videos
Black History: Why America Must Confront Its Past'' #blackhistory #america #shorts
Blackworldblackhistory
29K views•2026-05-30
#SeamansAct1915 #MaritimeHistory #LifeAtSea #BoatShitCrazyX #SaferWorkEnvironment
BoatShitCrazyX
859 views•2026-06-01
They Said Flight Was Impossible—Then Two Bicycle Mechanics Changed Everything#wrightbrothers
umars997
526 views•2026-05-30
Black Women Were Banned From White Suffrage Groups
Peoplediduknow
782 views•2026-05-31
A Volcano Created Frankenstein — And Killed Summer for a Year
TheDarkSideOfSmth
389 views•2026-05-29
Born into slavery in Beaufort
RoadsanRoots
613 views•2026-05-31
50.32 Judah And Israel Split / Jeroboam's False Religion - 2 Chronicles ch. 10-11
smyrnachristianchurchkokomo
107 views•2026-05-29
Iran's Secret Society Wrote the Constitution — Then Got Hanged for It
TheShadowLecture
502 views•2026-05-29











