Yet Another Cosmic Docking Theorist

Added: 2026-05-27

[00:00:08]What is your definition of fact?

[00:00:10]>> Something that's known to be true.

[00:00:13]>> No, that's incorrect.

[00:00:15]>> Well, that's not incorrect.

[00:00:17]>> No, it is. Uh, fact is undisputable truth.

[00:00:22]>> That is a fact. Yes. Yes, it is. You can look it up right now. As a matter of fact, >> I've looked it up before. That's not what it is.

[00:00:30]Okay. So, evolution is a theory which has zero based evidence for it.

[00:00:35]>> Literally, every single thing we know about biology confirms evolution. Every single thing.

[00:00:42]>> Which is okay. What is what what needs to happen for evolution to be >> all life on the planet would have to be related. Is all life on the planet related?

[00:00:53]>> Incorrect.

[00:00:54]>> Evolution is a gene mutation.

[00:00:58]>> No. Incorrect. Evolution is a gene mutation.

[00:01:01]>> Okay. You You're not going to run the show, Aiden. Okay. So, uh, if evolution were true, all life on the planet would have to be related. Yes or no?

[00:01:17]>> So, you're stating false information, which is why I'm not allowing.

[00:01:21]>> Yes or no?

[00:01:31]Stop muting me because you're wrong. 95% of the scientists that supported the Big Bang theory 20 years ago.

[00:01:37]>> Yes or no? If all life on the planet was or if evolution were true, all life on the planet would be related rather.

[00:01:44]>> That's not the truth. Gene manip gene mutation needs to happen for evolution to be correct. And there is zero evidence of gene mutation. Only adaptation is provable.

[00:01:55]>> Adaptation is not a thing that happens.

[00:01:57]So in order >> Oh my gosh. Adapt Exactly. Adaptation.

[00:02:00]>> When an organism reproduces, does it does it pass on genetic information?

[00:02:05]>> Correct.

[00:02:06]>> So evolution says that all life on the planet comes from a single original life form. Correct.

[00:02:14]>> No, that's not what the big that's that's not >> you. You were about it was about to say the big bang. That's hilarious. So yes, that is evolution.

[00:02:22]>> Yeah, because that's what you believe.

[00:02:24]So if you're if you're going to believe evolution is correct, of course you're going to believe the big bang is correct. But again, the big bang isn't correct because it has been actually >> I don't care about the big bang. So if evolution is true, >> you don't care about the big bang. Big bang is equal to fact on your thing. So yes, you do care about the big >> Okay. So uh evolution posits that all life is the descendant of an early original life form. Correct.

[00:02:53]>> Correct.

[00:02:53]>> When that life form reproduced, did it pass on its genes?

[00:02:57]>> Correct.

[00:02:58]>> Airgo all life on the planet would have to be related. So earlier you said no and somehow you're still saying no, which is just incredible. But this actually is exactly the case. Um, you agreed with every single >> Stop muting. Stop muting or what?

[00:03:15]>> Muting that that's that's not a direct conversation. Stop ming >> or what?

[00:03:20]>> Or what? Then run from the conversation.

[00:03:22]If you cannot have if you cannot talk back and forth don't have any power here. Thank you for admitting it.

[00:03:29]>> So evolution should end your lives then.

[00:03:31]>> Evolution claims that um >> evolution is a gene mutation.

[00:03:36]>> Evolution. Yeah. And those genes change.

[00:03:39]So all life on the planet would share genes. All life on the planet does share genes.

[00:03:44]>> Just because people share evolution has no not people. People and grass and puppy dogs and polar bears and bacteria and fungus show everything. Yes, it does. Because shows an origin of life. That does not show gene mutation.

[00:04:01]>> Yes, it does. Because would the organisms that are most similar share have the most similar DNA? Oh my gosh, you're stating theories as facts.

[00:04:10]>> Oh my god.

[00:04:12]>> No, I'm just I'm describing predictable empirical evidence that actually that can in principle be collected and already >> What is purable evidence? A theory.

[00:04:21]Correct. Correct.

[00:04:22]>> Evidence. Good job.

[00:04:24]>> So, um, >> oh my gosh.

[00:04:26]>> All of the life forms that are the most similar to each other would share the most genes. Their genes would be the most similar. And then the organisms that are radically different, they would share the least amount of genes, but they would still share some genes.

[00:04:42]>> Saying I'm on Google.

[00:04:42]>> Yes or no?

[00:04:43]>> Let me show my camera. Sorry. I I I can repeat your e is like literally a spermatzoa.

[00:04:52]>> E Whoa, hold on. I'm my camera cuz I have people saying I'm on Google. That's why my camera >> I'm not on Google. I'm spinning around the world.

[00:05:00]>> E.

[00:05:02]>> E. make it go away. Ew. Ew.

[00:05:05]>> A child dog. I'm 23.

[00:05:07]>> Yeah, I believe it. Anyways, so evolution would claim that all of the organisms that are the most similar would have to share the most genes. And then if the organisms are very dissimilar, they should share some genes but very few genes. The only way that that can happen is through mutation. And that is exactly what we find. So yeah, that's been confirmed. Not true because no scientist will back that theory.

[00:05:33]>> That >> they all do.

[00:05:35]>> No. No, they do not. They No scientist will stand on that theory because >> all of the evolutionary biologists do.

[00:05:44]>> No, they don't because it's not provable. They don't provable. I I already described to you what the evidence would be. In fact, I made you admit what the evidence would be and we have that evidence and then you just want me to agree with two statements that you said which are correct. The third >> necessary preconditions for something to be the case requires a gene mutation which there is zero evidence of. So if you are a fact >> listen I'm not saying that evolution can't be possible. That's not what I'm saying. I am saying that you are saying it is a fact and that that is inherently false.

[00:06:19]>> It is known to be true.

[00:06:22]Known to be true does not equal fact.

[00:06:25]>> That's what fact.

[00:06:25]>> Known to be true means it cannot be another way. Fact that's not what that means at all.

[00:06:31]>> Yes. Yes, it is. That is the definition.

[00:06:33]>> Actually cannot be another way. That there is no other possible answer. That is a fact.

[00:06:39]>> No, it is >> unchanging and unchanging.

[00:06:42]>> That is not the definition of a fact.

[00:06:44]That could >> Yes, it is.

[00:06:46]>> No, it's not. What you're describing could be described as a necessary truth, but not a fact.

[00:06:53]>> No, you're Oh my gosh. I'm I might be talking to a wall. Okay. My statement is the only the only correct statement up here is flat flat earth equals fiction.

[00:07:03]That is the only 100% proven to be the case.

[00:07:06]>> Less provable information than with less provable facts than most modern science.

[00:07:11]>> Has the shape of the earth been 100% proven?

[00:07:16]Big Bing is not 100% proven because there has been studies in the last 5 years that actually disprove that because life has passed the form of the start of >> has the shape of the earth been proven be w with 100% certainty >> uh with with modern cameras and yes what >> it has you've done this >> I I haven't witnessed it but I would I would have to say that the the people that have shown own the size of the earth. I would have to say I agree with that.

[00:07:48]>> Okay. So, why don't you agree with every evolutionary biologist, people that actually know what they're talking about?

[00:07:55]>> I I never said evolution can't be true.

[00:07:58]Stating it as a fact is fa is false.

[00:08:00]It's incorrect. It is not a fact.

[00:08:02]>> You just don't. You have your own private language where words mean whatever you want them to.

[00:08:06]>> Your statement equals fact is inherently big equals fact is inherently false.

[00:08:11]>> No, it isn't because they're known to be true. The Big Bang has been disproven by very credible scientists because the start of the universe 13.8 billion years ago. There is light past that point. We have found light past the point of 13.8 billion years ago. It's actually up to about 15.2 which would make the Big Bang inherently false.

[00:08:31]>> No, it would make the age of the universe older than we thought it was.

[00:08:34]Do you know how >> the fact that it has to be 13.8 billion?

[00:08:42]Yes, it is.

[00:08:43]>> Describe what the Big Bang is.

[00:08:45]>> The Big Bang is a compulsion of the The two atoms collided to >> You [ __ ] [ __ ] You're actually one of these idiots. You're like the third person in the history of this channel to present cosmic docking theory. As if that's what the Big Bang is. No, I think I think there's a >> Big Bang. That's what it explains. It lit it unironically thinks that cosmic docking theory is what the big >> genuinely what it explains verbatim.

[00:09:15]That is what it explains.

[00:09:16]>> What is a source? What is a source that you would trust?

[00:09:18]>> Big bang equals fact is inherently false.

[00:09:20]>> What is a source that you would trust?

[00:09:23]>> I trust college studies because that is the most based form of >> if if I got a source from a university and it disagreed with what you're saying then >> multiple universities. Yes. Yeah.

[00:09:35]>> Okay. Great. You could do that because Harvard and >> want to learn how to make people do this.

[00:09:41]>> If that's true, then >> what? Hold on. This is really complicated. I We >> It's not. This book will be your guide.

[00:09:51]I debunk all of the common anti-scientific arguments, plus some uncommon ones. Every single copy is personally signed and shipped by me.

[00:10:01]There's even an audio book link in the description. Look up look up the recent Harvard and Yale studies on the Big Bang and then post it in front of all your chat to see.

[00:10:15]>> Okay, so this is just uh this is just like uh the Google AI answer.

[00:10:20]>> No, don't use Google AI. Go to their actual studies. Stop doing it, >> kid. You're not you're just not even listening. So, >> stop stop AI. Go the actual studies.

[00:10:29]Have you actually read the studies? Do you get all >> I typed is the big bang the idea that the universe was created when two atoms collided? No. That is a common misconception. So do you always doubt all AI overview answers?

[00:10:46]>> Go to the recent Harvard.

[00:10:48]>> Yeah. So the question is, do you accept what the AI overview is saying or do you just always doubt what the >> do not trust Google AI?

[00:10:56]>> It's a yes or no question.

[00:10:59]>> Stop. Stop muting me.

[00:11:01]>> It's a yes or no question.

[00:11:03]>> No, you just said you would look.

[00:11:05]>> It's a yes or no question.

[00:11:07]>> No, you just said you would look.

[00:11:09]>> It's a yes or no question.

[00:11:11]>> Go to the recent >> Go to the recent Harvard and >> yes or no. Do you just simply doubt what the AI overview is saying here?

[00:11:20]>> Yes. Okay. So, you doubt it. So, we need to go >> AI is inherently like that. That is derived information. You're trusting AI.

[00:11:26]No, stop doing that. Go to the recent Harvard and Yale studies. Harvard and Yale studies about the Big Bang. The thing that we just talked about that you said you would look up. Go to those. The actual studies, not on Google, the actual studies that they produced that they show through their websites. Go to that.

[00:11:42]>> Yeah. So, this is harvard.edu.

[00:11:46]What happened in the early universe?

[00:11:48]Okay. So, I'm going to type in the word atom. the recent studies, the most recent studies they've done on the Big Bang that actually both both universities have have declared that they now are having to go do more research into the Big Bang because they no longer stand behind it.

[00:12:06]>> Okay. Can you read this or is the text too small?

[00:12:09]>> Can you zoom it in a little bit? I'll read it for you.

[00:12:11]>> No, I don't want you to read it for for me or for anybody. I'm just asking if you can read it.

[00:12:17]>> Yeah. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. I I can read it.

[00:12:19]>> Okay. I'm going to make this a little bit wider so it fits on the screen better. Holy crap. Why is my mouse being so weird?

[00:12:28]There we go. Um, >> again, I I I don't disagree with the statements that Big Bang can be true or evolution can be true, but you stating it is >> So, I typed in the word atom because you think that the big bang was when two atoms collided, which is called that's cosmic docking theory, not the big bang.

[00:12:45]So, I'm on Harvard's website. That's a source you said you would trust. So I typed in the word atom. Okay. So there's nothing about uh atoms colliding in that instance. The second instance uh plasma as the universe expanded the sthing plasma of subatomic particles cooled and formed hydrogen the first atoms. So that's not atoms colliding creating the big bang either. Um after the universe cooled sufficiently to allow atoms to form. No, that's not two atoms colliding.

[00:13:15]>> Yes, that's what you unironically believe in is cosmic docking theory.

[00:13:18]>> Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

[00:13:22]So, so when the theory of big bang got initially introduced, what was the statement? Like, like what what was the cause? Why? Why did they say that it was the big like what? Because it it's not what you're saying because the theory has developed over time.

[00:13:42]>> The theory at no point ever was that two atoms collided together at high speed and created the universe.

[00:13:49]>> Really?

[00:13:50]>> You're going to stand on that 100%.

[00:13:52]>> Yes.

[00:13:54]>> Really? Okay.

[00:13:56]>> Really? Go ahead and find a source.

[00:13:58]>> Give me one moment.

[00:14:01]Give me one moment.

[00:14:04]I I love that you said you're going to stand on that fact.

[00:14:07]That's actually perfect. It's perfect.

[00:14:10]>> Oh, it's so perfect, chat. It's perfect.

[00:14:17]>> You You know who originally put up the statement of the Big Bang? Correct.

[00:14:21]>> Originally put forth the theory, >> Gorgees Lmetra.

[00:14:27]his cosmic egg or eternal atom theory.

[00:14:31]Is that what you're going to go to?

[00:14:33]You're gonna claim that the uh original name it had means that two atoms touched tips?

[00:14:41]>> Nope. That's not the direction I'm going. But >> right, >> it's not it's not >> still waiting.

[00:14:48]>> Hold on. I'm going to I'm going to bring up the actual studies because you're you're you're looking on their website.

[00:14:53]>> No, you're going No, you're going to find a source that says No, no, I'm going to go to the same spot you're at.

[00:14:59]The fact is you're you're still >> I'm driving around Japan in my mortar fled car.

[00:15:05]>> You're you're uh you're still focusing on the fact that I said two atoms colliding based on the fact that you little sack of [ __ ] and I'm going to make you admit it. So go ahead, pull up the source >> again like you.

[00:15:19]>> Now I'm going to wait here until you have the source or you can Or you can stop being a and actually let what I am saying just go ahead pull up the source. You chat remember when it said I'm so glad that you claimed you're going to stand on that that you claimed your I Okay, then stand on it. Go find your source. Make me eat my words.

[00:15:56]>> Learn to have a conversation. Stop muting, >> buddy. There is no conversation to be have. All I should be hearing from you is clickity clack click click click while you pull up that source. Stop talking. Start typing.

[00:16:10]>> Maybe if you stop muting.

[00:16:12]>> Stop talking. Start typing.

[00:16:13]>> The source is here. Stop.

[00:16:17]>> I have it pulled up. Let me talk.

[00:16:19]>> Go ahead.

[00:16:20]>> Damn.

[00:16:20]>> Go ahead.

[00:16:21]>> You just keep muting cuz you're afraid of the conversation. This shit's pathetic.

[00:16:26]>> Go ahead.

[00:16:28]>> Pull up the source that says that the Big Bang was originally the idea that two atoms collided.

[00:16:33]>> No, no. I'm I'm going to pull up that Harvard.

[00:16:35]>> No, you said you're going to make me eat my words.

[00:16:38]>> Yeah.

[00:16:39]About Harvard.

[00:16:40]>> You said you're going to make me regret that I that I stand on the claim that it was never about two atoms colliding.

[00:16:48]>> Stop muting >> or what?

[00:16:50]>> You're terrified.

[00:16:53]I'm I'm searching a Stop muting. Stop muting.

[00:17:01]>> Oh, do you finally have that source that claims that originally the Big Bang was when two Adams >> collided? That's not what I said I would search up.

[00:17:08]>> Oh, well, that's what I said you're going to search up or you don't get to talk.

[00:17:14]We're going to search up that I would get to search which was the Harvard.

[00:17:22]>> Aiden, are you a liar or are you a stupid liar?

[00:17:27]>> Stop muting me.

[00:17:28]>> Are you a liar or a stupid liar?

[00:17:31]>> I'm I'm neither. The >> Okay, then why do you refuse to pull up a source that proves your claim that the Big Bang was going to Adam?

[00:17:40]>> You're gonna answer this question. It's the only thing that you get to do.

[00:17:44]>> You can't You have >> Nope. That doesn't answer my question.

[00:17:47]>> You can't have an actual >> You can't have an actual debate.

[00:17:53]>> Says the guy that made a claim and was so bold in his claim and was so proud of his claim and said he was going to make me regret taking the opposite position as him on that claim, who now won't engage with the claim.

[00:18:10]That's not what I said.

[00:18:12]>> Why did you say >> that? There are scientists that think the early universe was when two atoms collided. Why did you say that?

[00:18:19]>> That's not what I said. Stop.

[00:18:20]>> Yes, it is.

[00:18:22]>> No. Can I tell you what I said without >> I don't need I don't it it's the comedic value off. So, you can go do whatever you want to talk about. Now, >> this is what I said verbatim. I said I would show you the studies that Harvard and Yale did about the Big Bang that defalsifies its claim of >> Okay, so you're a stupid liar. That's what it is. So that's not what happened.

[00:18:46]What you said is that yes, early scientists did think that the Big Bang was when two atoms collided. And then I said no. And you said, "Oh, are you going to stand on that?" And I said, "Yes." And you said, "I'm so glad you're going to stand on that." That's what you were going to stand on. I was talking about >> Yes, that's exactly what happened.

[00:19:05]>> I was talking about this.

[00:19:06]>> So, we're we're done with your we're done with your lies. What do you want to talk about next?

[00:19:10]>> That you said that you >> What do you want to talk about?

[00:19:14]>> I want to talk about the studies that you still haven't looked up that we said that you said you were going to look up.

[00:19:19]>> Go ahead.

[00:19:19]>> That's what I want to talk about. That That's the thing I said that you were going to stand on.

[00:19:23]>> Yeah. Go ahead. No, it isn't. So, you're lying again, but whatever.

[00:19:26]>> Yes, it that is what I was talking about. Just because you have this weird mental condition to to fabricate words into other people's mouths does not make it true.

[00:19:34]>> Now now guess what's going to happen?

[00:19:36]I'm going to play the film back.

[00:19:38]>> Perfect. Please do.

[00:19:43]>> We we will be waiting.

[00:19:46]And while we're waiting I'm going to go to the studies that you said you would initially search up and haven't.

[00:19:54]>> Now play the film back. Perfect. Please.

[00:19:58]>> What was the cause? Why why did they say that it was the big like theory?

[00:20:04]>> Yes.

[00:20:07]>> Really? Okay.

[00:20:08]>> Really? Go ahead and find a source and created the universe ever >> saying because the theory has developed over time.

[00:20:14]>> The theory at no point ever was that two atoms collided together at high speed and created the universe.

[00:20:22]>> Really?

[00:20:24]100%.

[00:20:25]>> Yes.

[00:20:27]Really? Okay. Really? Go ahead and find a source.

[00:20:31]>> Give me one moment.

[00:20:32]>> Oh, so when you said, "Give me one moment." And you started typing, it was right after I said the Big Bang was never when that happened and then you said, "Oh, we Okay. So, watch.

[00:20:45]>> Does it do you like being embarrassed like this? Is it a kink or like what's going on? Are you a little bit weird?

[00:20:53]>> I'm going to show you. Watch.

[00:20:56]Go ahead.

[00:20:57]>> Go ahead. What >> are you Are you ever for you, Aiden?

[00:21:02]>> Are you Are you ever going to look up the the heart the >> No, Aiden. Uh I need you to acknowledge that you lied.

[00:21:07]>> Are you Are you >> When you acknowledge that you lied, we can move on.

[00:21:12]>> The The problem is I >> You can All you actually all you have to do is say sorry >> or my bad.

[00:21:21]>> You still haven't looked up.

[00:21:23]>> Waiting. I'm waiting for your apology >> on what?

[00:21:30]>> Are you going to like ask >> am I able to ask >> are you going to keep muting me or can >> when you every time you don't apologize?

[00:21:42]>> Yes.

[00:21:46]>> Can I ask what I'm apologizing for?

[00:21:48]>> That's already been explained to you.

[00:21:49]It's not happening again.

[00:21:53]What am I apologizing for?

[00:21:58]>> That's already been explained to you.

[00:22:00]>> Explain it again.

[00:22:01]>> Nope.

[00:22:05]>> So, you're telling me you're Are you a man?

[00:22:10]You can't explain.

[00:22:19]>> Tell me. I'm waiting for my apology >> on what?

[00:22:24]>> It's been explained to you already.

[00:22:27]>> So, for me to genuinely apologize.

[00:22:30]>> Yeah, it it was explained to you. You know exactly what your apologies.

[00:22:33]>> I have to know.

[00:22:36]>> Okay, you won't do it.

[00:22:38]>> To give a genuine apology, I have to know what I'm stupid disingenuous liar.

[00:22:43]>> I have to know what I'm apologizing for.

[00:22:44]Saying I'm sorry is not a gave up. I know what I'm apologizing for.

[00:22:48]>> No, it's it's okay. I gave up. you're incapable of.

[00:22:51]>> Or you can tell me what I'm apologizing for.

[00:22:54]>> I already did that. So, what do you want to talk about now?

[00:22:58]>> Okay. Since S since I'm not allowed to genuinely apologize and you just want to hear the words I'm sorry without an actual genuine apology, can we go to the recent Harvard and Yale studies that happened in 2023 about the about the Big Bang?

[00:23:12]>> Yeah, go ahead.

[00:23:14]>> Okay. Thank you.

[00:23:18]While you're at it, pull up that study that you were or not study, but uh prove the claim that you made that the original idea of the Big Bang was when two atoms collided. Pull that up on a separate tab cuz that's how this all got started.

[00:23:36]You said you were going to do that and then you never did.

[00:23:40]I again I did tell you that I was going to show you the studies about Harvard and Yale which is what I was talking about. I said are you gonna stand on the fact we were having a conversation I said I said are you going to stand on the fact that the that that the theory does not change over time. That is what I said again. Nope.

[00:23:58]>> No because it showed in your recording.

[00:24:00]That's not lying. That's the >> Nope. That's 100% not what happened. I said the big bang was never the claim that uh the big the big bang was when two atoms collided and you said, "Oh, really? Are you going to stand on that?"

[00:24:14]That's what actually happened. So, you're a stupid, disingenuous liar.

[00:24:18]That's the kind of liar you are.

[00:24:20]>> I I told you that. Are you going to stand on the fact that the theory didn't change over time?

[00:24:25]>> I'm still waiting for your Harvard study, by the way. Waiting for an apology. I'm waiting for the Harvard study. I'm waiting for every time I turn on my proof turn. So you have to pull it up >> because if I show you're not going to let me show >> it. Am I allowed to turn on my camera to show to show you once I >> pull up the document?

[00:24:46]>> Name the name of the study.

[00:24:48]>> Oh, okay. Well then Okay. Well, then I can do that.

[00:24:52]>> Still waiting.

[00:24:55]Well, I was I was going through the document, so you're going to have to give me a sec cuz there's not just one word for it. It was it was a six-month process that they were doing this, >> just a singular study.

[00:25:09]>> Yeah.

[00:25:42]Hey, uh, do you even know what the Big Bang is? Cuz the first time I asked you that, you you said it was cosmic docking, but that's not what it So. What What is the Big Bang?

[00:25:53]Do you do do you want like a like a like my bad definition or do you want like the scientical definition? I don't know the definition. I want your understanding of what it is.

[00:26:13]You don't even know what you believe in.

[00:26:15]Okay.

[00:26:15]>> No, no, no, no. I do. Sorry. you.

[00:26:17]>> That goes a long way in describing all the problems we're having.

[00:26:22]>> Okay. Polon plasma site. No, sorry. I'm I'm still looking through. Okay, here it is.

[00:26:29]Okay, so the black hole growth in the early universe is this is hold on, hold on.

[00:26:41]This is this is this is just where the study starts which is why I said giving you one name is not going to work because the study was it started with the black hole growth in the early universe and the reason that they changed their their theory about the big bang was because of information that they found in it which is why it would be easier if you just looked up the documents yourself instead of me trying to handmise I've already looked into and made a video debunking the thing you're talking about if you're talking about that they saw stars that were too big in the ly part of the universe. Uh that would go along with black holes, but I'm not aware of any preliminary black hole data. Maybe it's out there. I just off the top of my head can't remember any of them.

[00:27:22]>> Uh can you tell me about can you tell can you tell me about the stellar mass index that was used for the early on uh modeling of the big bang? Can you do that?

[00:27:32]>> I can't.

[00:27:33]>> Right. So do you know what a stellar mass index is?

[00:27:37]>> I don't.

[00:27:38]>> Okay. So, when you looked into these claims that supposedly debunk the Big Bang, did you look into what the scientific data that goes against the reputations is?

[00:27:49]>> No. No. I I never said it changed the Big Bang. I I sorry, I never said it debunked the Big Bang. I said it changed the theory of the Big Bang.

[00:27:56]>> That has nothing to do with whether or not it's true or false.

[00:28:00]>> No, it it would make it true or false because the the Okay, like I said, my my original statement >> Hold on, buddy. If I told you if I told you I was born on May 2nd >> uh and and you'd thought that your entire life and then you get to know me really well and you you learn all these things about me. Uh and then 10 years later I'm like actually my birthday's on May 3rd. Uh does that make does that make your knowledge about me all of a sudden not true? Does that make any the claim that I exist not true or anything like that? It holds the validity of the statement untrue. Yes. Because because then then you have to question the Hold on. Hold on. Because because then you have to question the the truth and the validity of the statements and where they're coming from. So that means you can no longer 100% trust the sources giving you the information, which is why I don't use Google, which is why I go straight to the documents themselves, which is why it's harder for me to just give you information. Wait, are you are you the one earlier that was saying something can't be a fact unless it's 100% absolutely proven and certain?

[00:29:08]>> No, I said that you or some other jack I said I said a fact means that it is unchanging.

[00:29:14]>> Okay. Yeah, that was you. Okay.

[00:29:16]>> It's definitive. A fact is definitive. A fact isn't a theory.

[00:29:21]>> Theory does not equal fact. And you should know that.

[00:29:24]>> A scientific theory is a collection of facts. A scientific theory is a collection of opinions.

[00:29:30]>> No, they're facts. They're rigorously tested and independently confirmed over >> and is gravity a theory or a fact.

[00:29:37]>> Name one thing. It's It's both. Name one thing that's a fact.

[00:29:42]>> Gravity is a theory, not a fact.

[00:29:44]>> It's both. Universal gravitation is a law.

[00:29:50]>> Okay. So, >> this is trivially true. Name one thing that's a bird.

[00:29:57]Check that out.

[00:29:59]>> So me saying my name is Aiden is a fact because it cannot be another way. You saying that the Big Bang is true is >> it's not possible that you could have ever been named something else.

[00:30:11]>> Me saying my name is Aiden is a fact because it cannot be another way. You saying the big bang >> you can't you can't legally change your name >> then it would be another like what are you talking about?

[00:30:24]>> So you can legally change your name. So me stay >> the status of the name of this of this little nipp that my name right now as as a fact is Aiden.

[00:30:36]>> Cool.

[00:30:36]>> It it is unchanging because I would never change my name.

[00:30:41]>> Could literally change. You can literally change your name.

[00:30:45]>> No, it wouldn't change it.

[00:30:46]>> Yes, it would have.

[00:30:48]>> No, because I wouldn't change my name.

[00:30:50]That is a fact. It is unchanging fact because I would never change my name. It is an unchanging fact. changed their names >> just because other people change. But the the statement isn't everyone's name is Aiden that no one's changed. The statement is Aiden. My name is Aiden.

[00:31:06]That is a fact.

[00:31:07]>> Yes. But that is a fact. That is a fact in the sense or just like every single person who's ever existed having a name is a fact. Except it doesn't hold up to scrutiny because anybody can change their name at any point. But that but you're focusing on the fact that other people can change their name. That's not changing the that's not changing my statement that my name is Aiden. That is a fact.

[00:31:31]>> Aiden, if Jeff Bezos said I will give you $100 billion if you change your name, would you do it?

[00:31:37]>> No.

[00:31:37]>> Why not be >> because I I I don't feel like I should be able to change. Like that's that's just morals.

[00:31:43]>> I didn't ask you what you feel like. I asked you if Jeff Bezos >> if Jeff Bezos offered you a hundred billion dollars to change your name, would you do it?

[00:31:52]>> No. No.

[00:31:53]>> Why not?

[00:31:55]>> Because of something you're not going to understand. Like that's that's a whole different topic.

[00:31:59]>> You can't That's a whole different topic.

[00:32:01]>> Because I'm incapable of giving an answer. Because then it'll be proven that I'm a hypocrite. Bro, >> no. No. Because it would >> If I broke into your house and I said, "I'm going to kill you and eat your baby unless you change your name." Would you do it?

[00:32:22]>> The the the answer is no. I would not change my name.

[00:32:24]>> So, you would just let So, you would just let me kill and eat your baby.

[00:32:27]Okay.

[00:32:28]>> That That means it's my time to go.

[00:32:30]That's That's not my That's not my dictation.

[00:32:33]>> I said I was going to kill and eat your baby, not you.

[00:32:37]>> That isn't I'm sorry. That that doesn't know because like that that has more factors than just being a fact cuz you would get your ass beat. That's that's A WHOLE DIFFERENT THING.

[00:32:47]>> Like like that's that's adding more factors.

[00:32:51]How about how about we focus on your statements evolution fact and big bang.

[00:32:55]>> So what's going on here chat is it actually would change its name under both of these conditions but it can't admit that. Uh because then everything it's been arguing for wouldn't be true.

[00:33:06]So there we go. No, because I because your morals are different does not make something a fact. Again, me saying my name is Aiden is a fact because I would I would it's not changing. It's not changing because other people would change their names does not >> So if I broke into your house when you were asleep and I handcuffed you, bound you up, you couldn't move, and then I dragged your baby into the room and I said, "I'm going to kill and eat your baby unless you change your name." Would you do it?

[00:33:33]>> That's not for me to determine. So you're So you're doing the Jordan Peterson thing. I I can't answer a hypothetical because to answer a hypothetical, I would have to assume >> I forgot how to do something hypothetical. I care.

[00:33:49]>> Well, you see, you can't answer hypotheticals because my name is Kermit the Frog. I mean Jordan B. Peterson. And if you put me into an intractable position where I'm going to have to make a moral decision, well then I can't do that because then I'm metaphorical substrate. And what what the hell even is Elliot Page's real name and gender anyway? I'm going to start taking quaudes and go to Russia and my daughter is a [ __ ] >> Stick to your statements.

[00:34:17]>> Stick to your >> Those are my statements. I'm going to go to Russia and take quaudes and my daughter is a [ __ ] Evolution and Big Bang don't equal a fact because they they aren't one they aren't 100% fact-based. They those things nothing is a fact according to you because there's not 100% factual based behind them.

[00:34:36]>> Yeah. And your name and your name is Aiden isn't a fact because you would change your name if I was going to eat your baby.

[00:34:43]>> It's unchangeable. It's unchangeable.

[00:34:45]>> So So if I said I was going to kill and eat your baby unless you change your name, would you do it?

[00:34:53]That's not changing my name. That's not changing the fact that my name is Aiden.

[00:34:57]>> Yes, because you would change your name.

[00:34:59]>> No, you you you're >> This guy is so [ __ ] stupid.

[00:35:03]>> Morals can't be added into factual statements.

[00:35:05]>> What do you want to talk about?

[00:35:06]>> That's not how it works.

[00:35:07]>> What do you want to talk about?

[00:35:08]>> Morals can't be added into factual statements.

[00:35:10]>> That's what you want to talk about?

[00:35:12]>> The the inherent The inherent statement of you saying evolution and Big Bang is a fact is false. I'm not saying that they can't be true. I'm saying you stating it as a fact is inherently false. That that was my >> and I don't care what you think. What do you want to talk about next?

[00:35:28]>> That's that's not what I think. That is the truth. You stating it as a fact is inherently false.

[00:35:34]>> Yeah. Well, that's just like your opinion, man.

[00:35:38]>> It can't be another way all the time.

[00:35:40]And you're stating >> the universe can't stop. The universe can't stop expanding tomorrow. It's it's it's actually it can't not be the the start of the universe that there's no start of the universe theory of time bro can change though >> there's no start of the universe is expanding doesn't mean the big bang created it >> no start of the universe >> huh >> there's no start of the universe Aiden >> if there's no start of the universe and the big bang is inherently false what are you talking you don't even stand behind your own theory >> uh if you actually read the studies the vast majority of >> you actually read the studies the big bang would be the create the start of >> if you actually look to what the scientists think. That's not what they think. So I don't care about your opinion as somebody that doesn't know anything about this. You don't even know what a stellar mass index is. So why should I care what your opinion on the big bang is?

[00:36:36]>> Me saying I don't know.

[00:36:37]>> The big bang is a scientific idea.

[00:36:40]>> It was discovered by scientists.

[00:36:43]Physicists are the ones we should listen to if we want to know anything about the big bang. They disagree with you. Your opinion doesn't matter.

[00:36:52]>> It doesn't change the fact that you're stating theories as fact. That's that that means your prompt is incorrect.

[00:36:58]Change your prompt.

[00:36:59]>> But I'm not interested in having that conversation. What do you want to talk about instead?

[00:37:04]>> Well, I I want to talk about your prompt because again, I am not. What do you want to talk about instead? I'm not talking about the I'm not talking about the fact that the evolution in Big Bang can't be true because I don't >> 100 Aidens 100 Aidens versus consent. I don't want to talk about the thing you're talking about. It's boring and you're wrong and I don't care. So, what do you want to talk about instead? I don't consent to that conversation. What do you want to talk about instead?

[00:37:33]>> Your live is about >> Your live is about it. Yes. And I spent many minutes discussing it with you and you don't get it. So now I no longer consent to that conversation. What do you want to talk about instead?

[00:37:51]>> Consent to a convers.

[00:37:55]>> Bro literally doesn't understand.

[00:37:58]>> I don't need your permission to do whatever it is I need to do to you.

[00:38:05]>> Consenting.

[00:38:08]Aiden, how many times have you had to say, "Look, it didn't count. We were both drunk."

[00:38:13]>> Never. What the >> Okay. So, I don't consent to this convers that topic for conversation.

[00:38:19]>> You cannot consent.

[00:38:19]>> Let's talk about something else. You can't consent.

[00:38:22]>> You can only You can >> What do you want to talk about?

[00:38:28]>> I want to talk about how your your prompt is false.

[00:38:31]>> Yeah. And I don't I don't consent to that that conversation. It's not happening.

[00:38:36]It's you can only consent to actions, not convers.

[00:38:40]>> Having a conversation is an action.

[00:38:43]No, >> converse is literally a verb. Okay. So, like literally, you can't even you don't even understand the language you speak.

[00:38:53]Converse is a verb. Verb. It's what you do. What do you want to talk about instead? I don't consent to the other thing.

[00:39:02]>> I want to talk about your prompt because >> Yeah. And I don't How do you not understand this?

[00:39:06]>> Change your prompt.

[00:39:08]>> Uh, no. I don't >> I don't take orders from little numb nuts like you.

[00:39:11]>> Your prompt is inherent.

[00:39:15]>> Your prompt is inherent.

[00:39:18]>> Your prompt is inherently false.

[00:39:19]>> So, I'm going to make this like literally so easy that even you could understand it. If you don't change the subject the next time you start talking, I'm kicking you out.

[00:39:29]>> Then kick me out. Your prompt is inherently >> get a free book, two free audio books, and add free videos by becoming a Patreon member.