FAILED BRIBE! Mogotsi Broke Down In Court After Failed Bribe Attempt Was Exposed & Bail Denied

Added: 2026-05-26

[00:00:00]The same man who tried to lie against our hero, St. Lieutenant Muinazi. The same man who confessed he was murdered someone in 2010. The same man who shot his own car and lied that he was attacked until forensic examination revealed he did it himself. The same man who tried to bribe the investigating officer in his fake assassination case is in court today looking for a possible way to be granted bail. Bran McGotsy is such a crook and liar. He has found himself in hot water as new allegations keep resurfacing against him day in and out. Initially, he was arrested for defeating ends of justice and faking his own assassination. But now, a more shocking one has emerged. It's a pity because the so-called political fixer is nothing but a criminal. At Madlanga, he was grilled until he cried and said he doesn't want to incriminate himself. At Ad Hoc, he was cooked live by the MPs.

[00:00:50]And today in court, the judges did more than expected. He broke down in agony after a shocking old incident was brought up against him. When things like this happen, we can only say Lul Long Manquinazi because he busted the can of worms. Hail Manuinazi now in the comment section if you love him and please don't forget to hit the like button and subscribe. Jabulani roll out the clips in court where he broke down in agony after new charges emerged against him.

[00:01:17]me. I submit that my prior convictions are dated, rehabilitative, and do not render me a present danger to to the society. Denial of the allegations. On the 3rd of November, I was driving in for Lauras and the buggy followed me.

[00:01:33]The car was the car that was following me made a U-turn and I and was and I was shot at once. I feared for my life and immediately allighted from the vehicle and fled. I later returned to the scene where I found members of the community and the police later arrived. I opened a case of attempted murder as I was a victim of attempted murder and not the aggressor. I therefore deny the allegations that I stage an assassination attempt and put the state to the to the proof of such allegations.

[00:02:06]Such an allegation is unfounded, speculative and inconsistent with the facts of what transpired. I further submit that on the date of the incident, I was not found in possession of a firearm or ammunition, nor did I fire shots in a buildup area. I further deny the allegations that I obstructed justice. On the contrary, I have all all times cooperated with lawful processes, attended the Madanga Commission when subpoenaed. The sequence of events demonstrates that I was the target of an unlawful aggression, nor the perpetrator of violence. My decision to open a case of attempted murder is consistent with the conduct of a law-abiding citizen who seeks justice through proper channels, not someone attempting to to obstruct justice. The allegations that I staged an assassination attempt is contradicted by my proactive reliance on the criminal justice system. If I had intended to obstruct justice or mislead the authorities, I would not have voluntarily laid a charge against unknown asalants. Current charges. I'm currently charged with defeating the ends of justice, possession of a firearm, possession of ammunition, discharging of a firearm in a in the public area and the legal principles.

[00:03:18]I'm advised that in terms of section 60 subsection 11B of the criminal procedure act one of 1977, the court shall order my release on bail if I satisfy the court that that that the interest of justice permit my release. H I respectfully submit that the interest of justice favors my release on the basis of my personal circumstances submitted herein. In S versus Gamini, the commission of court confirmed that B proceedings involve a balancing exercise between liberty interest uh of the accused person and the interest of justice and further advised that the presumption of innocence remains applicable until proven guilty by a contempt court by a competent court. in S S versus Bronco is a 200 upon my release to hand over to the investigating officer in this matter.

[00:04:06]The previous convictions were an opinion cases. I have three previous convictions, all of which are from the year 2012, which are as follows.

[00:04:16]In 2012, I pleaded guilty to two counts of assault with the intent to do previous bodily harm and was sentenced to two years direct imprisonment. I also pleaded guilty to one count of reckless and negligent driving and sentenced to two years imprisonment. I was released on the 14th of October 2015 on parole.

[00:04:38]Since my release on parole, I have never been convicted of a similar offense while on parole. I have no pending cases against me. I submit that my prior convictions are dated, rehabilitative, and do not render me a present danger to to the society. denial of the allegations. On the 3rd of November, I was driving in for Lauras and the party followed me. The car was that the car that was was supplied in court to me via WhatsApp from the publicans attorney Mr. Zacha.

[00:05:13]It was a PDF document statement from Diablo.

[00:05:22]This statement indicated uh an address uh your worship. I will omit it because I noted that there are also deputies in the same address that the appears on the on the ana it's the statement and this address is at Mabatu unit 13.

[00:05:56]It indicated that it indicated that she is the wife of the applicant and that the applicant resides with her at this address. The document shows that it was signed and commissioned on the 17th of uh May 2026 attached as uh marked as AR4 26.

[00:06:29]Uh on 20th of May 2026, I visited the address uh which is uh uh street maki unit 30 to verify the residential address.

[00:06:46]The number could not be found in uh Marsh Street Unit 13. The number was found on Moata Street, closest corner, Mush Street at a property. At the property, I found Miss Tandi Sino. I inquired if the applicant resides at the address. I was informed that he does not uh or ever reside at the address. I obtain a statement in this regard and attached to my statement as a R uh 05.

[00:07:34]I also took photos and attached them as a R 06.

[00:07:46]person my profile has been achieved.

[00:07:52]Uh 27.1 identity document of the applicant.

[00:08:00]Uh >> have you seen why this man should not be granted bail? He lied about his address, faked an assassination attempt, was convicted three times in the past, and not even qualified to be a political fixer because he has only a grade nine result. Why do you think he is giving the court fake address? The answer is obvious. He wants to get a bail and run out of the country. This time around, the court is now a compromised institution and justice will be served accordingly. Jabalani roll out the clip where he gave a detailed background of his life, story of how the assassination was staged and how much he paid and the amount he normally receives as salary.

[00:08:41]Today is uh the 25th day of May 2026 and for the state is Mr. Inana and the interpreter is Miss Palani and for the defense is Mr. The worship the matter has been set down today for purposes of daily application and the state is already >> Mr. Sparta are you ready to proceed?

[00:09:29]>> Good morning.

[00:09:30]>> Morning. I can confirm that we are ready to proceed with the application in this meeting.

[00:09:37]>> Thank you. Your worship defense is going to proceed by way of an affidavit which has been prepared uh on behalf of the applicant in this matter uh with the leave of the court. May I proceed to refer into the record this in the regional court for the regional division of held at Disp in the matter between Opa Brown the applicant and the state respondent affidavit in support of schedule 5 bail application in terms of the provisions of section of act 51 of 1977 I the under signed of Rui the ID number uh I will omit the ID number for privacy purposes.

[00:10:21]>> That's fine.

[00:10:21]>> Thank you, Wash. Uh do hereby declare and state under oath as follows. After after following has been explained to me, this is a schedule 5 bail application and they rest a burden of proof on me to prove to the court that my release on bail is in the interest of justice. My failure to do so will lead to the refusal of bail. I have the right not to incriminate myself and anything I submit in the application h for bail may be used against me in the trial of this matter. I chose to apply for bail by way of submitting this affidavit at this stage and not verbally testifying. The rest a duty on me to reveal all my previous convictions and pending matters to the court and my failure to do so will constitute a criminal offense. I confirm that I am the applicant and accused in this matter.

[00:11:14]I'm an adult male person age 47 with the following personal particulars. I'm a South African citizen with a valid South African document which is verified uh which if verified will confirm my permanent residency in the country. I was born on the 22nd of August 1979 in Mafik in northwest province of South Africa. H your worship he attaches his passport which will be marked as OBM1.

[00:11:45]I'm I'm the son of Freda and the late Y Mosi who gave birth to me in the northwest province. I'm married to Dorothy Mosi in terms of customary law and the marriage was has sub subsisted for 7 years. uh he attaches his copy of uh the ID of Dorothy Makosi as well as an affidavit uh relating to the residence of Dorothy Mos. Uh my wife and I reside at number uh your worship will also omit the address uh for privacy purposes. That's right.

[00:12:23]>> But it is part of the academic. Uh he attaches a copy of the proof of residence which will be OBM4. I'm a father of four children ages respectively 21, 19, 16 and 4 years old. I do not have relatives and assets outside the republic uh the borders of the republic of South Africa. I submit that I am not a flight risk with strong family ties in the republic of South Africa. My my highest education standard is grade 11 for standard 9 and I attended same through Dolin College.

[00:12:59]I'm attended same through Domin College.

[00:13:03]I'm self-employed owning businesses in the northwest province including a mult a mini multi complex with nine tenants and a liquor restaurant with 13 staff members. My estimated monthly income is 82,000 uh with the restaurant turnover of approximately 110,000.

[00:13:25]The turn the turnover in respect of the restaurant has since been adversely affected after a raid by members of the South African police services who came in in or around October 2025 to raid the place. Business since then has been very slow. My wife works in the family business and my family is financially dependent on me and her.

[00:13:48]>> Which case did you think resurfaced against him in court that made him to be convicted as far back as 2010? Many people might have forgotten, but all the clips are already compiled here. At Hat Hoc Committee, there was a clip where he was grilled by the MPs until he confessed that he once killed someone, but the case was later dropped. Who is that person? Why was the case dropped?

[00:14:10]What later happened? And why did the case resurface again? Jabulani, answer all these questions by rolling out the clips now.

[00:14:17]>> Then when they charged you, the charge was it capable homicide or murder? It was uh murder and then yeah it was murder but this the my defense was intending to apply for kapa to convert it to kapa homicide but before the trial then the matter was withdrawn.

[00:14:36]>> You had already pleaded.

[00:14:38]>> Yes. I was going to plead not guilty.

[00:14:40]>> No I'm asking if you had pleaded.

[00:14:43]>> Yes. In a schedule six what happens? Yes. That's correct. Yes. In a in a schedule six of schedule 56, you have to plead. Yes. Before going to trial, I pleaded not guilty.

[00:14:55]>> Yeah. And when you plead not guilty, they would have said to you, uh, you are charged with the murder of Sauron. Sur, do you understand the charges? You say yes.

[00:15:06]>> And then you plead not guilty or guilty.

[00:15:08]Then you say not guilty.

[00:15:10]>> So they told you it's murder.

[00:15:12]>> That's correct.

[00:15:13]>> Which means there was a prima evidence of murder.

[00:15:17]>> I don't know. No, that's why they charged you with murder. If they didn't have a prima case of murder, they would have changed themselves >> into capable homicide. That's correct.

[00:15:27]And then witnesses didn't show up. There was no witness. He was very far when they took this person to the clinic.

[00:15:34]Then he this this person arrived. Okay.

[00:15:38]And he later passed on. No. Thanks.

[00:15:44]>> Thank you. Thank you. No, thank you.

[00:15:47]thoughts. This situation is very sad.

[00:15:52]If you know you are a father to your children, I believe and maybe your family is depending on you. Am I correct?

[00:15:59]>> Yes. Correct.

[00:16:01]If I were to give my time to you that you take this opportunity and maybe give dignity to your surname, give dignity to your family, take this opportunity and come out and tell us the truth in everything and not try to maybe dodgey this thing. Would you take it?

[00:16:24]>> The question will take the opportunity.

[00:16:26]Would you take it?

[00:16:27]>> Which opportunity to tell the truth about what? a lot of things that are really really happening because you see there's something I'll tell you at SAPS when one has a handler your behavior is not the same number two you are drawing a you are drawing a picture to me and the and the survivants that your handler allowed things to happen while you were under his guidance.

[00:17:01]For example, it looks as if it's a pro promotion. You went you and you were a uh what do you call this?

[00:17:07]>> An informant.

[00:17:09]Then you got a promotion to being an agent.

[00:17:12]>> Yeah. Not by him. Not by the first person.

[00:17:15]>> By the first person and this handler of yours knew about this information. So are you telling South Africans that the state doesn't care if you are doing continuously doing wrong things. It just gives you an >> thing are you referring to honorable me >> a m you see and once h something did not happen intentional there's a premeditated where I plan to murder someone >> okay >> it's a similar thing >> let's stop right there now let's leave the intention part >> I just want to ask you when you continue let's let's leave the intention part >> are you saying to me with what happened.

[00:18:00]>> Are you are you happy with how the court conducted this matter of yours in dropping the case?

[00:18:08]>> What was it?

[00:18:10]>> How was it dropped? Let's go there.

[00:18:11]>> I'm saying there was no witness.

[00:18:13]>> So the case must be dropped because >> who was going to witness also passed on.

[00:18:17]>> Okay. If I take a gun and shoot here and it's just me and him and I take him to clinic or hospital, >> what witness? Why why would a witness be needed there if there's evidence that I shot the person? I said I shot the person.

[00:18:34]>> No, you see that >> you took the person to the clinic, right?

[00:18:37]>> Yeah. But there are gun laws.

[00:18:39]>> No, no. Leave the gun.

[00:18:41]>> I was making an example. You fought with this person. He fell >> and then you took him to >> the clinic. Yes.

[00:18:48]>> Is there a need for a witness there?

[00:18:52]Now, that's why I'm saying to you, I think they say, >> but maybe it's a child. We will say imaginary child.

[00:19:07]>> Yeah.

[00:19:08]>> Is there a chance with this handler of yours is an imaginary handler?

[00:19:12]>> No. You see, chairperson, I'm still repeating myself. uh the committee will not get what is here for but we cannot accept no you see and I'm giving example even when you live here with a car >> and you happen to hit someone unintentionally I hear honorable man asked whether it was placed as a kalpable or not and I'm saying h the intention was to go and place it as kalicide because it was It was just a fight.

[00:19:50]>> Now >> you are investigating just >> No, no. I want I want clear on this thing.

[00:19:56]>> No, but I'm not making a point every time.

[00:19:59]>> Okay, let me wait for you.

[00:20:01]>> We are talking about a name of individual baron mouth and we come here thinking you are coming to give information.

[00:20:11]Everyone gets so personal. The South African must see is a liar and what that's and that's exactly what you are doing because you are not going to achieve what you are here for. Why I'm saying that you would tell me the family the person died and I've said it was not by intention and we went to court and there was and we intending to bring a plea of >> okay now 15 minutes. Sorry for a you know what is going let's do like this honorable member is just killing our characters telling the world >> it's not going to m the way I understand what honorable said >> is in a question form >> is the handler of Mr. imaginary or not?

[00:21:11]>> No, >> I I don't think honorable casted vision upon him.

[00:21:15]>> He was not even >> he just he just made a question. So he was not even there and when he passed on in 20 was that last year he had nothing to do with this matter. It's absolutely something that happened and and we were still here on that time and most importantly we are coming here before the commission uh to say here's the evidence Konazi never spoke about me and the murder and all these things then somebody comes here and you feel that South Africans must see I think this what happens when you go home when you prepare everyone Sorry to disturb you just for the sake of time.

[00:21:59]>> I only have 10 minutes or 15 minutes.

[00:22:02]I'm not like them.

[00:22:03]>> Yeah, but we have not spoken to the I just want clear on. I want you to understand my question.

[00:22:08]>> Yes. He's not even >> You say that case was dropped because there was no witness. Where? What happened to the witness?

[00:22:14]>> He passed on.

[00:22:15]>> What happened? Why did he die?

[00:22:16]>> He was sick.

[00:22:17]>> What was the outcome of the court proceedings? Was he granted bail? Was the case postponed? Jabalani, give us the answer in this last clip. should in fact that the shorter remand should be granted. I am not available on Wednesday. I am available uh Thursday and Friday and you worship the I the state is aware that the aail application is aged. However, your worshipper this is not the what the state has created because uh the uh state was not given the address on numerous occasions. So it the fault cannot squarely lie on the state. That's the conclusion.

[00:23:15]>> Thank you.

[00:23:20]At this stage I will grant the performance for the purpose of the address to be verified and I think is false for uh the state as well as the applicant is in this matter because of u the address which the state have previously it differ from what he uh he have provided to the court. So I think there is a need. So, and I also noted that this application is agent and therefore I'll grant a short postponement to Thursday as the prosecutor is available on Thursday. So, the 28th >> as a court Mr. Maki, your case is postponed until Thursday the 28th of May. For your address to be verified, we will proceed with this application on the understand.

[00:24:30]Thank you, Mr. Excused.

[00:24:41]Should I be excused?

[00:24:42]>> You are excused. Thank you. Thank you.

[00:24:44]Heat.

[00:24:47]Heat.