🚨Trump STUNNED as Judges DECLARE “FRAUD ON THE COURT”

Added: 2026-05-31

[00:00:00]You can't get 35 exjudges to agree on an order with sweet greens. And so when they band together to file a brief to implore a federal judge down in Miami, who I know, Judge Williams, to reopen a case and find that there was fraud on the court that she had been deceived in the case involving Donald Trump, his private lawyers, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Department of Justice.

[00:00:26]Well, you stand up and listen. And when one of those judges that signed off on it is J. Michael Ludig, who I've interviewed, I don't know, a dozen times here, and as a conservative icon, a member of the Federalist Society and constitutional scholar extraordinaire, should have been our Supreme Court chief justice instead of John Roberts. Well, you you think, well, let's hear more, Popach. And when I tell you that another of the 35 judges is one of the uh former colleagues of Judge Williams, Judge Angaro, uh and they're um I'm sure they're kind of close. Then you then I hope I have your attention. Let's talk about the new filing. I'll give you the top line. I'll give you the inside baseball from my perspective as somebody that practices in this particular courthouse with these judges.

[00:01:20]In almost every single instance, those judges collectively have struck down as unconstitutional essentially every single initiative of this president as the constitution required them to do.

[00:01:40]So that today the the only well today the only people who can save America are the lower federal court judges of the United States of America.

[00:02:00]And they are determined to do so simply by honoring their oath in every one of these cases.

[00:02:10]Let's get down to it. How can First question, I'm taking questions. First question, how can people who were not parties to the case, they're strangers to the case involving Donald Trump suing his own Internal Revenue Service with the complicity of the Department of Justice that he controls in order to come up with a phony settlement? How can they bring this motion to have the court use her factf finding powers to declare a fraud of the court at all? because it's obvious when parties are both sides are committing the fraud or the alleged fraud, they're not going to raise it with the judge. And as the judge has already ruled or was close to ruling, she doubts whether there was an adversarial process going on at all.

[00:02:57]This looked like Trump v. Trump. You know, he controlled every every uh piece on the board. And so she was about to dismiss the case for lack of adversarial process, lack of jurisdiction, and now under rule 60 of the federal rules of civil procedure. Yeah, I brought the receipts. You as a stranger to the case can can implore the judge to use her powers, especially when you're 35 former federal judges.

[00:03:25]And here's how they frame it in their motion. This is all about the phony settlement. Let me do a quick timeout. I said at the beginning in one of my hottakes that Judge Williams, who I know well, I appeared in front of that she should have not closed that case and allowed the dismissal without having seen the settlement papers, especially after a day later they they uh uh the Department of Justice demonstrated that they had used the federal court system.

[00:03:55]They had used Judge Williams. She had been used. Jin had because they mention the lawsuit because the lawsuit if it's in good faith having been brought which it wasn't can be the basis for a settlement by the department of justice using the judgment fund the statutory judgment fund which is used to compensate victims. But if you don't have a good faith case, then you don't have an ability to settle. Then there's no fair consideration and the Department of Justice can't use the judgment fund, which bec which is this weaponization fund that we've been talking about. So this is the very heart of the matter.

[00:04:33]And in their settlement, which they refuse to give to the judge, they talk about the lawsuit. There was a lawsuit, a whole bunch of recital. There's a settlement. And here's the case number just to show it was legit. And they even go so far, the lawyers for the plaintiff, which is Donald Trump's personal lawyers, they even go so far as to say, "Well, we were going to even amend the lawsuit. We were going to make it into a class action involving many other victims in a case that the judge, Judge Williams, was about to dismiss to she already uh questioned its legitimacy. You were going to amend a suit. She was about to throw out a window." Okay. So when I saw that settlement agreement and the amendment to the settlement agreement on May 19th where Todd Blanch said, "Oh, by the way, we're going to let the Trump family off the hook for 16 years of tax audit exposure." I was like, "Wait till Judge Williams sees this." Nope. Nothing happened. Enter 35 federal judges.

[00:05:32]Here's what they say.

[00:05:34]Page one movements are 35 former federal judges. A full list is attached and it runs the gambit. District Court judges, appellet court judges, federal circuit judges, and Judge Angaro, who was part of the Southern District of Florida, where we're talking about the purported settlement that the parties never placed before this court raises profound questions about the party's cander towards the court. See, that's one of the top ethical rules that we have to abide by as court officers that were sworn to abide by cander to the tribunal and the manipulation of the judicial system that goes on which threatens to undermine the confidence of the administration of justice. So they file under rule 60 which allows strangers to the case to raise to the court's attention an issue of fraud on the court. By the way, the judge has her own inherent authority. Sue Esponte on her own without any party to raise the the same issues. They go further. The court on page two, the court, you were deceived. Despite plaintiffs not having mentioned any settlement in their notice of dismissal, the Department of Justice publicly announced a settlement of this action shortly after plaintiffs filed their dismissal. The settlement, in quotes, commandeers the contrived sum of 1.776 billion from the United States Treasury to be handed out to recipients chosen by a commission effectively controlled by the president. They're they're being nice. It's handing out money to those that beat up cops.

[00:07:07]Um they then go on to say on page four movements 35 federal exfederal judges submit that this settlement is a product of collusion and is itself a fraud on the court but the court need not decide the ultimate issue now under rule 60 they want her to hold factf finding get everybody into the room at the same time.

[00:07:33]I still love coffee. the taste, the smell, the whole ritual. But full caffeine was making me feel jittery and anxious. So I started trying alternatives. And honestly, I've really been enjoying Mudwater. Their new low calf coffee blend is made with organic arabica coffee, elenine, and functional mushrooms like lion's mane and cortiseps. So you still get that rich fullbodied coffee taste without overloading on caffeine. And if you want something even gentler, they also have their original blend made with cacao, chai, turmeric, and functional mushrooms for more sustained energy without the spikes and crash of traditional coffee.

[00:08:14]Every ingredient in mudwater is USDA certified organic, non-GMO, gluten-free, vegan, and kosher with zero sugar and no sweeteners added. Are you ready to make the switch to cleaner energy? Head to mudwater.com and grab your starter kit today. Right now, our listeners get an exclusive deal up to 43% off your entire order, plus free shipping and a free rechargeable frother when you use code legal AF.

[00:08:43]That's right, up to 43% off with code legal AF at mudwt.com.

[00:08:51]After your purchase, they'll ask you how you found them. Please show your support and tell them we sent you.

[00:08:59]They're all Trump control. Trump's private lawyers and Coral Gables, Trump's IRS lawyers, Trump's Department of Justice lawyers. Bring them all in.

[00:09:08]Trump, let's get to the bottom of whether the court had been had. They say on page eight, even if the court declines to entertain this motion under rule 60, it has the authority to issue suisponte relief. That means Suis Monte is what a court can do inherently without being requested to do so by parties on her own initiative of her own accord and they want her to do that.

[00:09:31]They say that the fraud on the court has been established by clear and convincing evidence. They go through the evidence and what they really want to do is reopen the case. I know the top line for some of the media was uh parties move to reopen case involving Trump versus IRS.

[00:09:48]Yeah. not to improve it, but but to have a declaration that there's been a fraud in the court because if Trump, you know, some people have asked me, Popac, the Senate killed it, right? They're not going to fund it. Why are we still in court? Because you have to have a court pronouncement, a declaration that this is unconstitutional, this is illegal, this is in bad faith, this violates the judgment statute because we have to teach the Department of Justice now under the new corrupt management of Todd Blanch a lesson or they'll do it again.

[00:10:19]You know, as much as we like to talk about the midterms and making Donald Trump the lamest of lame ducks, which it will and powerless if the Democrats get the House and the Senate, uh we still got, you know, two years after that. So, it's only the midterms, only halftime, folks. He can do a lot of damage between now and then.

[00:10:41]I want to do a quick shout out. Andreas Rivero Rivero Mestri is the local counsel. I know Andre well. I've had him on the show to talk about uh his lawsuit that uh stopped for a a minute anyway, the transfer of land for free from a college in Miami by way of um Ron DeSantis, the governor, directly to Donald Trump's uh foundation to build his library, a $300 million plot of land that would have been good if that money had gone to the university, the Miami Dade College, because their entire endowment is only less than $300 million.

[00:11:17]I'm going to try to get Andre Rivero back on the show to talk about this filing as well on legal AF and on Midas.

[00:11:25]Now, the other thing that I spotted in going through the appendix which listed all of the federal judges is Judge Ursula Angaro is is the only Southern District of Florida judge listed. Now, if I were them, and I'm going to have Judge Ludik back on the show. If I were them, I would love to ask if they tried other Florida judges and they were refused or they didn't think to do it.

[00:11:53]My understanding is that Judge Angaro and Judge Williams know each other and are close. In particular, Judge Williams before she became a federal judge had been a federal public, no, not a federal public defender, the federal public defender. like the US attorney is the top person in a district on the prosecutor's side. The top person on the defense side is the federal public defender. And she was the federal public defender for Miami. I think also for Orlando in Orange County, uh for uh for the middle district of Florida, very well respected. The judges knew her well, respected her, and she was one of those people that just needs to be on the bench. She's done great work. She stopped Alligator Alley from being developed for a period of time. She's got no problem. She's got a lot of courage. She's gone after Governor Dantis's attorney general, uh, Mr. Utmier a couple of times for violating her orders and violating the law. So, she's no shrinking violet. I'm hoping that this this motion, which will be opposed by the Department of Justice, I'm sure by the time this hottake goes up, we'll be reporting on the opposition paper. But, it's going to be up to her.

[00:13:04]I think she should hold an oral argument. I think she should have a hearing and I think she needs to make a ruling and it should be to reopen. I was sort of hoping as I said that when she saw the settlement agreement that she realized she had been had. Uh we'll continue to follow it the way we always do at the intersection of law politics here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF. So until my next report, come over to Legal AF YouTube channel, hit the free subscribe button while we continue to grow our prodemocracy channel. Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our Substack at midasplus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron Philipowski, add free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content only available at midasplus.com.