This video presents a debate about gender identity inclusion in British Columbia's Human Rights Code, with the speaker arguing that while free speech should allow individuals to express their gender identity, the legal recognition of gender identity in human rights codes creates practical consequences that the speaker believes marginalize biological reality and impose obligations on others that infringe upon their rights.
深度探索
先修知识
- 暂无数据。
后续步骤
- 暂无数据。
深度探索
Yuri Fulmer says he would remove gender identity from the BC Human Rights Code.本站添加:
But the problem going on in British Columbia is gender identity has been accepted as fact and not only that, it's been installed in our human rights code.
Where it is now against the law to discriminate against someone based on their gender identity.
So let's break down that sentence.
That sounds nice.
We shouldn't discriminate against people.
Based on their gender identity.
Politicians hear this and they say, "Yeah.
Let's sign off on that bill."
What does it mean?
>> sounds good, doesn't it? Anytime you say, "Let's not discriminate." That sounds good. Yeah. What does it mean in practice?
It means male rapists are sitting in women's prisons. Yeah. Because you can't discriminate against it. If a man says he's a woman, he's now a woman according to the law.
It means men are in women's sports. It means men are going into women's rape shelters. It means Vancouver Rape Relief was defunded by the city of Vancouver because they didn't allow men into their women's rape shelter.
It means a man named Adam Laboucan who raped a 3-month-old boy, drowned a 3-year-old toddler, was imprisoned, then identified as a woman. The BC government paid for him to get breast implants and they transferred him into the Fraser Valley Penitentiary for women, where he is to this day, where they have kids up to the age of five with their moms because they have a mother-infant unit.
It now makes it so that playing pretend must be acknowledged by everyone else in society or you get fined $750,000 like Barry Neufeld did at the Human Rights Tribunal because he objected to gender ideology going into schools.
He was literally fined $750,000 for injury to dignity.
Well, injury to dignity of whom? Because this complaint was brought by the Chilliwack Teachers Association and the BC Teachers Federation, not any individual.
And so now he's appealing that.
I talked to Barry Kima to one of my events on the weekend, so I was talking to him about it. Oh, good.
Yeah, I have eight complaints against myself right now at the Human Rights Tribunal.
All filed by one man who previously got a criminal record for threatening to kill me. Oh, goodness.
I'm sorry.
>> Uh, he's he's filed complaints against probably a dozen people and journalist organizations like Western Standard.
He previously took women to the Human Rights Tribunal because they refused to wax his nether regions because he says he's a woman. So, he called up these aestheticians mostly from India.
>> hearing this story. And most of them working out of their homes with with children present. And they wax women. This is what they do.
So, he called up literally just to make a human rights case.
He called up probably 20 different women, asked them if they would provide the service. They don't provide it. So, then instantly he said, "You're discriminating against me on the basis of my gender identity."
And it went to the Human Rights Tribunal. Fortunately, he lost, but he's still weaponizing the system against people. Yeah.
And because this is in the code >> language, right? We've we've made we've made words weapons against people.
Yes, we have. So, I guess the the main question here is what would you do about it as premier?
Will you commit to taking gender identity out of the Human Rights Code?
Yes.
And why would you do that?
Yeah, because I think what we're doing is weaponizing and marginalizing. And I I think we can't do that in our society.
We have to say that, you know, there is a there is a biology here. That biology is real.
Uh, I think it's it's if somebody wants to say that they're a somebody, you know, is a a man and wants to say they're a woman, I my my belief in free speech allows me to say to that I that's perfectly acceptable to me. I think you should have the right to say what you want.
But I don't think you have the right to take away my rights around it. Right.
So, if you want to have If you're a man and you want to say you're a woman, free speech, fill your boots, right?
But you can't force me to act differently, cuz then you take away my right to free speech.
And that's what I think is being done.
Absolutely.
>> rights are being taken away and trampled by your rights.
And that's not what I believe conservative values are.
相关推荐
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29











