In family law cases, parties may file motions for clarification when court orders contain ambiguities or inconsistencies, and courts typically require a valid court order to exist before a party can be held in contempt for non-compliance.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Sarah Boone Is Trying To Take Control AgainAdded:
Sarah Boon claims she doesn't understand, but in reality, it's just another power grab she is attempting to do. Now, I am late to covering this. I actually found out about this file because I got recommended YouTube videos of other people covering this. So, let's dive in even though I'm a little late.
This is an amended motion, handwritten to her last handwritten motion. And let's just dive into what she's saying here. In support of this amended motion, respondent states, "On April 7th, 2026, this court entered its supplemental final judgment in this matter after final hearing on August 25th, 2025.
On April 22nd, 2026, respondent timely filed her motion for clarification and or hearing regarding inconsistencies in the court's findings concerning alimony aars 26 months." Now, I've been very busy dealing with computer issues. Just I hope my webcam's fine. the USB port died on my brand new computer. So, I'm just dealing with a bunch of stuff. So, maybe I'm misremembering. Let me know.
Didn't she stipulate to the 26 months?
So, that's just, you know, out the window. She cannot like it, but she stipulated to it. And wasn't she also late for her filing? Let's continue. And the green stuff is just me covering addresses that are public, but I'm just covering them anyway. Respondant hereby amends and supplements her previously filed motion to include additional issues arising from the court's order regarding corrective payment deposit information and telephone communication between respondant and the minor child.
In the supplemental final judgment page 15 section E the court orders all alimony payment deposits shall be made by cashier's check money order or certified bank ddraft made payable to correct pay and paid with a deposit slip by the due date above too. And there's the address. The information above is incorrect and requires correction to ensure respondent properly receives the court order payments in a timely manner.
The correct payment information for money orders, cashier, sex, and certified bank drafts needs to be payable to Sarah Boone and it has a different mailing address. I don't know enough whether this is correct or if maybe this is her attempt to circumvent some system where they would be taking part of that money for payment she owes inside the prison.
Respondent requests also whether petitioner may satisfy the court-ordered payments electronically through the above online system which provides expedited access to funds and proof of payment. So it's a correct pay so maybe do it online. In the supplemental final judgment page 15 section E it states within 90 days petitioner being identified on Sarah K. Boon's automated visiting record with a correct approved status pursuant to rule 33-6071 FAC petitioner shall make payment one in amount of $600. So, okay. So, it says within 90 days of Brian being added, he has to pay.
Petitioner has been approved visitor since September 17th, 2025.
But there wasn't an order 90 days after that, Sarah.
So, she can't have retroactively ordered him to pay. Respondent requests clarifications where the nine-day period begins at the entry of the supplemental final judgment or upon approval of becoming a visitor is stated and the correct dollar amount for payment one pending her original motion. It's going to be when the order exists. Sarah, that's when it's going to be. It's going to be when the order exists. And you know that I think she wants to get Brian for contempt, right? In the supplemental final judgment page 13. This is this is why I said if I was Brian and I had any way to do it, I'd pay all of it immediately. I would I want the minimum contact in the supplemental final judgment page 13 section D. It states beginning May 1st 2026 mother shall be entitled to one telephone call per week with the minor child. Okay. The court does not specify which party is responsible for the financial cost associated with the weekly call and any holidays referenced within the order.
I thought they did and it Sarah.
I really thought they didn't it Sarah but further the order does not address whether additional telephone calls may occur if respondent is willing able to pay all associated costs for such communication. So and I see the little thing here where my webcam's messed up.
So here's my guess here, right? I'm going to I'm going to put on my like Sarah Boon thinking cap. I'm going to down myself a bottle of wine. I think Sarah is wanting the judge to require Brian to pay for the call and she's thinking, "Oh, and then if the judge says I can get more calls if I pay, then I can take the money I would have paid and then use that for a call if I want." If she's, you know, not ignoring her son, which Brian, I believe, has claimed she did before when she doesn't get her way. And this is a mistake in the filing where it's one again, but we're here. Therefore, necessary clarification needed for determination of whether the petitioner is responsible for accepting the weekly holiday calls at no expense to respondent. I don't believe she is whether additional telephone calls may occur upon agreement of the parties and or respondents expense. I'm sure it would have to be agreement of the parties. I I'm I'm actually positive of that, but um I don't think Brian's going to say yes.
for both parties to properly comply with the court's order, judicial clarifications necessary to avoid future disputes regarding payment obligations and responsibility to maintain consistent communication with her minor child. Respondent maintains and reasserts all arguments requests relief contained within the original motion for clarification or rehering filed on April 22nd, 2026, including the pending issues related to alimony orars. She wanted more money. Wherefore prosay respondent Sarah K Boon respectfully requests his honorable court to grant hearing and or provide clarification regarding the discrepancies in alimony or arars identified in the original motion. Enter on the court record the correct payable and mailing address for alimony payments to be made to petition respondent. Grant the online payment option for petitioner to make expedited payments as an alternative to mailing.
I Why is she asking for online payments? I if if Brian was asking, I could see it.
But why is she asking? The only thing I can think of is like h he didn't even think to ask this Brian and have a more of a reason to complain if anything's ever late. Right. Confirmed petitioner is an approved visitor clarifying when first installment payment is due and the correct amount to be paid after respondent pending motion is addressed.
Clarify which party is responsible for the cost associated with the one weekly call and holiday call ordered by the court. clarify whether respondent is permitted to have reasonable additional phone communications or minor child if uh bears the associated cost.
It also Brian would have to agree Sarah.
I don't think there's anything restricting you only to that call. It's literally going to be down to Brian because he doesn't have to do more.
But just because Sarah says we'll all pay doesn't mean Brian has to agree, right? Amend the supplemental final judgment as necessary to reflect all court clarifications and findings. Grant further relief as honorable court deems just improper. Respect Lucid's 20th day of May 2026. Sarah Boone prosay respondent.
So this is classic Sarah, right? She is already starting and saying look uh I already told you how I want you to actually change the judgment from the thing that I agreed to. I I might have stipulated to it but here it should be different. Uh, and also, uh, I I I can Brian possibly pay for all my phone calls, but then can I force more phone calls on Brian if I use my own money because I don't have to use it now because you're going to force Brian to do the payment for me. But also, can you make sure that Brian uh, pays me, but uh, can can he actually retroactively be in contempt for not paying me before the order existed?
It's Sarah, right? This is why I was a little sad when we got the order with weekly calls. Sarah doesn't deserve that. She's going to weaponize everything. Anything the judge gave Sarah, she is already weaponizing anything.
I really I mean Brian if he he could do a GoFundMe for all I care. Pay Sarah the money he has to pay her and just cut off that part.
I think just cut it away. Make his life easier. The less he is involved with Sarah, the simpler his life is because she's going to exploit. That's all this is. This is Sarah Boone trying to exploit the court to still go after Brian. And it's all and always was about the money. And I guarantee the calls to the minor child. They're not going to be about him, house, school, house's day.
It's going to be, "Hey, do you think your dad can give me some extra money?
It's really hard in here. I'm out of honey buns. I need them. They're medicinal." It's going to be that type of thing. Hopefully, you found this video interesting. Uh, I've been scouring for things to cover. There's a new, um, Wall Street Journal Galain Maxwell thing. I have it in like a post on my page, my wall or whatever they call it on YouTube. You can see where I mention it. Um, I don't think it's worthy of a video, but maybe if there's an interesting response, I will. I've got a bunch of different court cases I'm following. Um, uh, definitely starting I would say if you know any cases that are starting that are interesting, like starting actual trial proceedings next week or the week after, let me know. Um, this weekend I have I'm going to be pretty busy, but I I definitely would have more free time next week to dive in and not like, of course, going on on the weekend anyway. Um, but I put that out there.
Um, because it's been a it's been a rather slow month in my opinion, at least for my coverage on both of my channels. So, I really want to ramp it up for uh June if I can. But thank you all.
I don't I I feel like everything Sarah wants clarified was clarified in the original motion. She just doesn't like the the results. The only thing that might have any standard of like actually need to be looked at. Maybe it's where the money is being sent if that's wrong.
But is it wrong or is that Sarah maybe trying to just speed up? Cuz I'm assuming if the money gets sent to the first place, there's probably a delay that goes to the next place and then eventually goes to Sarah. It's not like it just goes into limbo. And maybe that's why she's wanting it online because she would get an immediate dopamine rush of funds every fixed day of whatever month if he's paying monthly. Again, I don't think he should.
I think he should lump sum it and just cut her off. But that's up to him. that is his choice. Um, but I'll see you in the next video and uh hopefully I'm going to be honest, hopefully it's not Sarah Boon. Hopefully she uh doesn't get a doesn't get a response even worth covering. I hope it's something like judge just saying no. I I I I honestly hope my next video is not Sarah Boon.
Related Videos
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
8 Hidden Things About Mackenzie Shirilla Netflix's 'The Crash' Didn't Show You
MarvelousVideos
2K views•2026-05-28
MP Garnett Genuis warns Canada’s MAiD system has ‘gone too far’
WesternStandard
187 views•2026-05-28
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02











