The video underscores a fundamental shift where personal loyalty to a single figure has completely replaced traditional party institutionalism. It reveals that the GOP is no longer a coalition of ideas, but a centralized movement where political survival depends entirely on one man's approval.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Lefties Losing It: NBC pollster confirms Trump owns the GOPAdded:
It's time for Lefties Losing. Let's start in the UK before we make our way to the US. We saw huge numbers marching against mass immigration, marching against the leftist government of Kestama. The aerial shots of London paint a picture and they show that Brits did not listen to the prime minister.
>> Tomorrow's march in London is a reminder of what we're up against in the battle of our values. The organizers, including convicted thugs and racists, are peddling hatred and division.
>> Yes, according to Kia, anyone marching, including these granny's are right-wing extremists. They're thugs and white supremacists. They should be shunned and silenced. Well, let's look at some of the hate on the streets of London.
>> Love him.
>> It's the least I can do.
>> Okay. Appreciate you, brother.
>> I love you.
And that is white supremacy unfolding right in front of >> disturbing scenes. The sad truth is that for these self-loading Brits, these anti-West leftists, the mere sight of the Union Jack, the St. George Cross, is triggering. A scene like this would send them into therapy. Start >> the marches there. And check out the streets of London today. What a beautiful site.
fully fully loaded. Look at that people.
It is insane.
Absolutely insane.
>> And they would hate the Christian symbolism, the number of people carrying crosses, the number of Christians taking part in this rally. And this was a diverse march. There were people of all backgrounds.
>> And I stand for this [music] cross which is Christianity. AND I STAND FOR togetherness and I stand for British values [music] because I'm British and this belongs to the people that are here that pushed in pushed into this paid into the system and didn't come over illegal. My mom and dad are from Jamaica and guess what? They had a passport cuz they came through the front door. Didn't come on a bloody boat.
>> And this lady also declined to see Tommy Robinson as some unrepentant racist.
>> Brings you to London.
>> Uh for Tommy Robinson basically. Yeah.
So what about him do you like?
>> Uh his courage basically cuz he has a courage. He can stand up by himself like you know. So I would say his courage and his faith as well.
>> What about the people that have been calling Tommy Robinson racist for his views?
>> Um I think they have their own problem.
>> Yeah, they do have problems, don't they?
And there is always a brave white leftist woman ready to emote wildly.
Watch this young lady cry her eyes out watching the massive march.
[music] [music] Oh, it's so sad. All these people loving their country and marching. How will she ever cope? Uh but the march did unite the nation in their shared hatred of the prime minister >> here. Summer is a um he's a wank. He's no sense. He has no common sense.
>> That's what I would He's a a pig is better because we eat it.
>> And there was a very British chant that went up outside the PM's residence. It rhymes with banker but starts with W.
>> [cheering] >> And of course, these marches always attract a counterprotest. This year's was fairly lackluster. So, let's look at a classic from last year. This uh mother and son team so loving, so sane, and likable. Of course, I Jess. They're feral mother.
>> Okay, [laughter] that show show him your sign.
>> All right, let's see. Off Nazis.
>> All right. Would you like to elaborate?
>> Um, I mean, I think he summed it up really. Nazis. Um, [laughter] >> okay.
>> Tommy Robinson, anti-ivision, uh, pro Palestine. So, WHY ARE YOU HERE, RASHI?
WHAT DO YOU FEEL ABOUT TOMMY ROBINSON?
Your >> thoughts on Tommy Robinson. I want to eat la. [screaming] >> For 10 years now, and particularly in the past six years, we've heard the Democrats repeat the lie that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy, that he's a fascist, unfit for office. As is often the case with the left, every accusation is a confession. Here is failed Democrat presidential candidate Camala Harris putting on the agenda a list of malicious measures to upend democracy as we know it to ensure her political opponents never win again.
Sounds a bit fascist to me. We talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the electoral college.
We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multimembers districts. She calls it a no bad idea brainstorm. I call it cheating. And Camala, just a little reminder, you could get rid of the electoral college altogether and you still wouldn't be president. Trump won the popular vote along with every swing state. But let's hear more ideas from Camala. Let's talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and DC.
These are the things I think that we've got to do. We've got to neutralize these red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. Blue states expanding their maps to stop red states from cheating. By cheating, she means voting and those votes counting. She wants to negate the votes of her opponents while introducing new blue states and expanding existing blue states and gerrymandering like hell. Donald Trump demands election integrity after 2020 and is called a threat to democracy. Camala wants to destroy American democracy and do you see any outrage from media circles? Of course not. Joining me now is Newsweek's senior editor at large Josh Hammer.
Josh, tell me what would be the impact of these Camala ideas, expanding the Supreme Court, statethood for Puerto Rico and DC, not to mention messing with the electoral college and having blue states expand their maps.
>> Uh, Rita, you're looking at essentially the destruction of the United States Constitution. That that that is not an exaggeration. that that this is basically where the where the current Democratic party base is at right now.
They want to gut the electoral college.
They want to gut the United States Senate itself. They they want to add Puerto Rico and DC as states. They they don't care for the wisdom of America's founders. America has has the greatest constitution that was ever devised by men in the entire history of lowercase our republican self-governance. Because we had geniuses, men like James Madison who wrote in Federalists number 51 that because men are not angels, ambition must be must be made to counteract ambition. That's how you get the separation of powers. He famously wrote in federalists number 10 about the problem of faction and how you can control for factions. And they don't care for any of this because fundamentally all the current Democratic party cares about is power. But in reality, the Democrats [snorts] have been in a century plus long war against the US Constitution. This is a war that started literally over a century ago with Woodro Wilson who was the first great progressive president. He was heavily influenced by confidently European Germanic political philosophy.
Hegel comes to mind. Then you had FDR and the New Deal. By the way, I I didn't even mention court packing. One of Kla Harris's terrible ideas. FDR at the height of his power in the 1930s proposed court packing actually in 1937.
And guess what? The Senate Judiciary Committee, which at the time was heavily controlled by FDR's own part of the Democrats, rebuked him in the harshest terms possible. They sent a scathing letter and said, "We will go down history as standing for an independent judiciary there." And that is why we still have nine justice to this day. Kla Harris and today's Democrats have no such compunctions. But fundamentally, Rita, even more so than this centurylong campaign by the the progressive left to destroy the US Constitution, I think what you're seeing here is a desperate political movement as well. This is a movement that has ceased. They've essentially given up on attempting to persuade others. They don't care about actually trying to win the argument, not actually trying to persuade you that their rights when it comes to immigration or to to gender ideology or or to this or that. They don't care.
They they recognize actually that they've lost the argument. That's why, as you correctly pointed out, all the swing states have voted against Kla Harris. They all vote for Trump there.
So, they've lost the argument. So, what are they left with, Rita? They're left with blowing it all up and destroying the system and burning it all down. It is it is the impulse of utopian leftistence since time memorial.
Unfortunately, there is nothing nothing but misery and despair down that road.
>> [snorts] >> Now, let's talk about the incredible results in Louisiana, where Rhino Bill Cassidy became the first sitting Republican senator in 14 years to lose a primary. Here's NBC.
>> It's the official. NBC News has now declared that the second spot in the June 27th Republican Senate runoff in Louisiana will go to State Treasurer John Fleming. So, the runoff now is set.
Congresswoman Julia Lelo, State Treasurer John Fleming, and that means that Senator Bill Cassidy, twotterm Republican incumbent senator, who voted to convict Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial in January of 2021, has been defeated. He will be denied renomination.
>> Josh, we keep hearing MAGA is dead. It's fractured. The GOP base is fractured.
And yet we saw the landslide wins uh to MAGA candidates in Indiana. We've seen every single House Republican who voted to impeach Trump lose. We've seen five Republican senators who voted to impeach lose as well. This is very much Donald Trump's GOP despite all the media rhetoric.
So, I I think the most amazing part of the Louisiana situation, as you saw there with that graphic, is that Bill Cassidy literally came in third place.
All all he had to do was come in second place just to make the runoff there. But there were not one but two people ahead of him. And Rita, the mind reels as to how deeply unpopular an incumbent has to be to not make it in the top two in in his own primary in a given state. But this is the power of the Trump endorsement. This is the power of Donald Trump sicking his political operation on you and putting you in in his bullseye in his crosshairs. There's going to be another huge test, by the way, in Kentucky this Tuesday, actually. So, it's coming up just this week there.
It's going to be the the Kentucky primaries and in Kucky's fourth congressional district. Donald Trump has gone all allin trying to defeat the incumbent Thomas Massie who started years ago as a principled libertarian. I am personally not a libertarian, so I have my disagreements, but he was a very principled, intellectually honest guy.
Massie has now been just an an absolute absolute thorn in MAGA side, an absolute thorn in Donald Trump's side. To say nothing, of course, of the fact that he has made common cause of people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson going down a particularly irksome conspiratorial rabbit hole there. But in any event, that's going to be a big test as well of of the Trump endorsement power. The polling in in Kentucky 4 is is a little close right now. I personally would not bet against Stalin Trump. I not bet in favor of Thomas Massie there. Ed Galron is a Navy veteran. He's the one who's trying to challenge Thomas Massie in Kentucky there. There's a lot of writing on on this race, Rita. It's one of the most is one of the most expensive, if not the most expensive, congressional primary, I think, in American history. It's it's a lot a lot of money being spent here to knock off Thomas Massadair. I predict ultimately that will be successful. And the very simple reason for that is because, as you said, this is still Donald Trump's party.
Eric Trump has announced he plans to sue MS Now host Jen Saki. She was of course Biden's press secretary for a period now. He is suing her for a number of claims she made about his business interest in China. Let's have a look at a little bit of that segment. He's supposed to be sort of firewalled off from any US government activities because he took over the family businesses when his father reentered the White House supposedly to prevent conflicts of interest. But there he is.
You can see him. You see, Eric is on the board of a company called Alt Five Sigma. And you can see him and Don Jr.
here ringing the opening bell at the NASDAQ. Yep. Uh she went on to accuse him of being, as you heard there, a board uh member of a company purportedly seeking to do business in China. But Eric Trump has responded saying, "I have had zero involvement in any merger discussions involving any public entity I do not run or control. I have zero business interest in China, no properties, no investments, nothing.
Contrary to her monologue and blatant lies, I have never been on the board of um Alt 5. Not now, not ever. Any person with basic access to Google and willing to open a company's annual report or proxy statements would know this. Josh, you're a lawyer. Is Jen Saki and MS Now, are they in trouble?
Uh, she could be. So, look, defamation is not an easy thing to prove in American law. It all goes back to a very misguided Supreme Court case from the 1960s called New York Times versus Sullivan. In my opinion, this this was a very very incorrectly decided opinion.
But nonetheless, what the court said back at the height of the liberal Warren Court 60 years ago, give or take, was they said that if you are a public figure, then you have to prove the standard is called actual malice. So, it it's not sufficient that the person lied. you have to prove that the person did so with actual demonstrable malice.
Now, having said that, Rita, in the case of Jen Saki and and Ms. Now, there that seems to me like a pretty plausible standard. Frankly, I think I I think it would not be a a a tremendous stretch to try to go into court there and be able to demonstrate, especially with the beauty of discovery, that there is actual malice from Jen Saki people against Sarah Trump. Surely that is not an insurmountable threshold. I if nothing else, I'm very happy to see these people dragged into court and and I wish Eric Trump nothing nothing the best in in his possible lawsuit there on the actual facts here. The the question is whether or not he's on the board of alt 500 company. That that is a very easily verifiable question of fact. I I think about this other high-profile defamation case that's currently happening. I mentioned Candace Owen. She she's being sued by Breijie Mcronone, the first lady of France there. Candace Owen says that Breie Mcronone is a man.
Virginia Mcronone quite reasonably says I'm a woman not a man that's an easily verifiable statement so when it comes to to this kind of thing Rita you can prove it one way or the other there and to me that makes it a a more plausible legal case >> now let's talk about that China trip uh what were the key takeaways uh other than improving trade relations was much else accomplished >> so the key takeaway is that Xiinping is even more allin on ti Taiwan than I think many of us thought. This apparently was what he led with in his two plus hour sitdown in in the great hall in Beijing with Donald Trump there as as the media has has reported there he started talking about what historians refer to as the thousadies trap this notion that a rising power can overcome a a declining power. It's a lot of Chinese Communist Party propaganda there but he really really really went all in on the Taiwan issue. Now, for what it's worth, Rita, what what I've heard is is that Donald Trump definitely talked a lot of nice talk about China. But what I heard from people who weren't on the trip or were very close to those who were on the trip, so I heard this secondhand is [snorts] that Donald Trump apparently didn't even actually eat the food that he was served. They had a private chef there. They were so distrustful of the Chinese there that he wouldn't even eat the food that was served the dinner. So, I I think a lot of this a lot of these optics of our two countries being on the same page there is just that actually is just optics.
It's kind of classic Trump, by the way.
Donald Trump does this time and time again. I think back sometimes to 2018 in Helsinki, Finland. He had a press conference with Vladimir Putin that the media were tearing him up for. He was saying Putin's a strong leader. They're like, "Oh my god, he he's he's a Putin candidate, a manurian candidate. He's soft on Putin there." No, he's not. No, he's not. He's not soft on Putin there.
It's It's a very It's the same exact thing here. Donald freaking Trump is not soft on China. He has been hardcore on the China issue for decades and decades and decades there. So he's he's making it sound like I think that we're on the same image. And by the way, by the way, if China actually wants to help out America when it comes to to to Iran, when it comes to Ukraine and and Russia, when it comes to anything, Cuba, right right off our shore here in Florida there, great. I say great there. I don't trust people ultimately, Rita. I don't trust them as far as I can throw them.
And I'm pretty sure Donald Trump feels the exact same way based again the fact that he wouldn't apparently even eat the food that he was served.
>> Incredible. That That's incredible. And I saw when he did the toast, he barely had a sip of of the drink. key. He had the teeniest, tiniest little sip. Um, again, serious trust issues there, understandably. So, >> what would be the Trump administration's attitude, do you think, if China did go ahead and invade Taiwan?
What would we expect to see from America at that point?
>> So, it's an unambiguously nightmare scenario and it's one that US war planners, strategists have have been gaming out for decades, decades now.
Now, if I'm being very honest with you, Rita, uh the the the war games folks in the Department of War and elsewhere in in the think tank world, university, etc. there, this ends up being something of of a 50/50 proposition there. There are some war games where if there's a full-scale war, the United States wins.
There are many scenarios where China actually wins. It would essentially be a home war for them. Taiwan, of course, being roughly 50 mi off the shore of mainland China. that that that is a very unenviable proposition if you are the United States and already spread pretty thin throughout the world. So all that means is that we really really really really don't want to test this hypothetical there. And what that means in concrete terms is to basically arm the crap out of Taiwan, to arm the crap out of Japan and the Philippines, I would argue India, obviously Australia, your country, America's key allies there in that part of the world there. The more that we can have our allies do our deterrent dirty work for us there, obviously with our American citizens there, I think that is the best way possibly to to try to preclude a People's Liberation Army invasion of Taiwan, which would be truly catastrophic, unfortunately, if it happens.
and catastrophic certainly for us here in Australia. Josh Hammer, thank you so much for your time tonight.
>> Thank you as always, Rita.
>> Let's check in on miserable maiden Chelsea Handler. Fresh from being scorched at last week's Kevin Hart roast, Chelsea has decided to weigh in on the LA Mel race, releasing this video. Oh, hi. If you're seeing this video, this is a reminder that a [music] straight white male former reality star that has no previous experience in government should not be a legitimate political candidate. [music] Have we learned anything yet? The bar is on the floor, people, and I need you to jump over it. Okay, thank you. Have a nice day.
>> Mistake, Chelsea. Mistake. That prompted Spencer Pratt to post this video of Shane Gillis from Kevin Hart's roast, where he reminds everyone that Chelsea Handler chose to hang out with Jeffrey Epstein in 2010. That's two years after he pleaded guilty to two felony counts of soliciting prostitution and soliciting prostitution from a minor.
>> Chelsea Handler went to dinner at Jeffrey Epstein's house in 2010.
[laughter] It's just a fun one. I look, you can look it up. There's articles. It wasn't like a big party. There was like seven people there. And uh it was like Prince Andrew and uh Woody Allen were there.
Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, Chelsea Hamlet.
>> Joining me now to discuss this and more is host of the Kinsey Scoffield Unfiltered podcast. Kinsey, don't mess with Spencer Pratt, I guess, is the message there, or or Shane Gillis.
>> Yeah. Morally Bankrupt Chelsea Handler walked right into this one. Uh, Spencer Pratt understands media and social media better than most celebrities. I He's one of the first ones to admit, "Yeah, I call the paparazzi on myself and taught an entire generation how to do the same thing, including Meghan Markle." Um, and you know, the second she tried to posture politically, he reminded everyone of her own very questionable judgment. Um, Shen Gillis has become untouchable in comedy right now. So, I I think that that's a perfect example of that. But um if your name ends up in one of his sets, legally change it, you know, good luck recovering from that.
>> Well, yes, you had Tony Hinchcliffe go for her as well. I thought he was even more brutal than Shane during that roast. And uh I think she got roasted more than the actual subject matter, Kevin Hart. Now, as late night host Steven Colbear prepares for his final week on CBS, his successor has declared that he will avoid politics on the show and quote, "Just be funny." The man set to replace Co Bear, comedian Byron Allen, sat down with CNN and told them of his plans to differentiate from Colbear.
>> Don't talk about politics. We don't talk about anything that's topical. We We don't talk about anything. We don't do anything that's racist or sexist or anti-semitic or homophobic. Just be funny.
>> Just be funny. That's going to be a dramatic change from Steven Coin, >> who's not funny. Yeah. I mean, late night audiences are Yeah, they're they're exhausted by the lectures disguised as comedy. And you know, Colbear stopped feeling like entertainment years and years ago. Uh pe I don't think people mind political jokes because if you think of Leno or Letterman, they used to do some funny bits back in the day, but what they don't like is being scolded every night or in some cases like look at Kimmel being judged and judged unfairly. I you know that's just not entertainment.
Staying in California and Governor Gavin Newsome has been mocked for his cringy social media posts as he welcomed Korean boy band BTS to the state. news and posted on X. Three soldout shows in California can only mean one thing. BTS is in town. He posted it with a purple heart often used in BTS fandom. And the finger heart hand gesture commonly used in South Korea. Kinsey, the man is 58 years old. I mean, come on.
>> Yeah. But we should stress like we love BTS here. This is not BTS backlash. Uh, but it is a little embarrassing watching the governor of California cosplay as a K-pop super fan while people in his state are [laughter] frustrated about crime, homelessness, and, you know, just lack of affordability. The reaction online shows people see right through it. But Newsome's constantly trying to borrow celebrity energy to elevate himself politically. Flashback to Charlie Kirk, his little chat with Charlie. Um, and this BTS post came across as desperate and, you know, just wanting positive attention.
>> Now, Page Six is reporting that former Baywatch star Pamela Anderson is making room for love in her life as rumors swirl of a potential romantic relationship with Hollywood mega star Tom Cruz. One insider told the National Inquirer that Anderson's latest performance in the film The Last Showgirl piqued Cruz's interest in her.
The movie got people to see Pam in a very different light, including Tom.
They've been in touch ever since.
Kinsey, I am not buying this. This sounds like another publicity stunt just like that supposed romance with Liam Niss. Yeah, the naked gun rumors that we had to sort through that we still are really confused by because nothing ever materialized. I mean, to be fair, Pamela's having a career resurgence right now. So, naturally, I think people are linking her to huge stars. Um, but audiences are more cautious about buying into these stories immediately. I'll believe Tom Cruz is dating someone when Tom Cruz confirms it himself. And even then, I'll wonder if it was manufactured by Scientology. Okay. Hollywood romance rumors are basically a marketing strategy.
>> Now, NFL legend Tom Brady made his modeling debut this week, stepping out for Gucci in their fashion show in New York. Among the starstudded audience were Mariah Kerry, Shawn Mendes, and Kim Kardashian. Kinsey, I got to say, he looked pretty good. Jazelle's obviously taught him some things before their divorce.
Yeah, I mean Tom Brady looked completely comfortable out there. He's a beautiful guy. I mean, he's transitioning from NFL leg legend to like luxury brand ambassador, and I think it works for him, and I'd rather look at him on a runway than a Kardashian any day.
>> Well, yes. I think uh you know, people were having a go and saying, you know, leave the supermodel work to Jazelle, but I don't know. I mean, that was pretty compelling to me. I had to watch it a few times for research purposes.
Now, before you go, uh, we have to talk about Megan Markle. She traveled to Switzerland this week for the unveiling of the Lost Green Memorial, which pays tribute to children who have lost their lives as a result of online violence and digital harm. Let's have a little bit of a listen to Megan's speech.
One day, generations from now, children will look back at this era with absolute disbelief that adults once allowed digital spaces to exist without basic protections for young people. Kinsey, uh, what do you make of that? She's an interesting one for that role. When she was in Australia, she claimed to be the most bullied person in the world >> while taking pictures with other people's children that went all over the internet. You know, like that that's wild to me. Like actions speak louder than words. And if Megan wants to protect children from the internet, she should start by keeping her own damn kids off of social media. They are underage and cannot consent to mommy's use of their likeness to sell crappy jam. I think the way the Sussex's use other people's suffering and grief to elevate themselves or try to change public perception of their toxic brand is truly sinister. There is a selfishness and a darkness about that that I find repulsive.
Kinsey Scoffield, thank you so much for your time
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











