Trump Meeting in Situation Room to Decide on Iran Deal

Añadido: 2026-06-01

[00:00:00]Heat.

[00:00:21]Heat.

[00:00:30]And we are back with another episode of the Kyle Lans Loan Show. A lot to talk about on today's show. I will be solo.

[00:00:41]Uh but a packed lineup of guests coming on the show next week. Uh we got regular Larry Johnson on Monday. Jim Webb returns to the show on Wednesday and Scott Horton comes back on Friday. By the way, I'm just curious as far as the audience goes, who are some of your favorite guests that we have on this show? Let us know in the comments section. If there's somebody we haven't had on for a while you'd like to see them back, uh let us know in the chat.

[00:01:08]And uh if there's somebody I haven't interviewed that you think might be a real good show, go ahead and throw that out there. To catch everything we got going on at the Ka Lancelone Show, subscribe to us on YouTube. Best place to follow everything. We're putting out shorts. uh smaller clips from each episode. And of course, that's where we stream live Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday at 4:45 Eastern. And then uh if you're listening live now or if you're listening later on, give us a like, give us a share, help get this out there to a few more people. And we do put the show out in an audio only form. So I I think the video adds a lot of really cool stuff to what we're doing here. But if you just want the information, you only have time to listen to your drive on work, Spotify, wherever you listen to your podcast, be sure you're subscribed to the Kyle Lands Loan Show. Let's kick it off with the the big news today.

[00:02:02]Reports all over the media coming out of Iranian and American sources that a deal, a memorandum of understanding is on the table. Let's first go to Donald Trump's breakdown of all of this. Uh the president on a very long post on true social wrote Iran must agree they will never have nuclear weapons or bomb. The Hormuse straight must be immediately open. No tolls for unrestricted shipping traffic in both directions. Ships caught in the straight due to our amazing and unprecedented naval blockade which will now be lifted may start to the process of heading home.

[00:02:46]So very interesting announcement here and this seems to be a major major victory for the Iranians right that Iran is going to be able to have the straight of Hormuz reopened and also to have their ports reopened. This was the situation by the way in uh the what April when this ceasefire deal was first agreed to that uh the the straight of Hormuz would reopen and the blockade would be lifted. Now, when we go into the Iranian section, we'll get into Iran saying that the strait is going to be administered jointly by Iran and Oman, and that's going to follow the Iranian protocols. And the tr the protocols that Tron has so far put out say ships will be playing environmental and maintenance fees to transit the straight of Hormuz.

[00:03:34]So, I don't think it's going to be open free and clear as Trump says. I think it's going to be open with some conditions imposed by the Iranians. Now, this is where uh Trump's announcement gets a little bit tricky and a little bit discouraging that we might not actually have a deal. Uh he writes, "The enriched material, sometimes referred to as nuclear dust, which only Donald Trump refers to as nuclear dust, by the way.

[00:03:59]Nobody else calls it that." He says, "It's buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains caused by our powerful B-52 bomber attacks 11 months ago." He's referring to operation midnight hammer there. He says saying on top of it will be unearthed by the United States which it is agreed is the only country along with China with the mechani mechanical capabilities of doing so in close coordination and conjunction with Iran plus the IAEA and destroyed.

[00:04:32]So he's saying that we're going to take Iran's nuclear material and destroy it.

[00:04:36]And he also says no money will be exchanged until further notice and adds I am now meeting in the situation room to make a final determination on the deal. So what Trump writes right here about the nuclear material I think is going to be the the biggest sticking point to getting a deal done where Donald Trump says we have to have Iran stockpile. I'm guessing we're only guessing and assuming here he's talking about the stockpile of highlyenriched uranium. That's uh 60% enriched. Iran has about 1,000 lbs of it. The US claims it's buried, I believe, in Isvahan, the nuclear facility there. It's really unclear if it's actually there, but that's what I think Donald Trump is assuming and hoping uh when he makes these statements. He's saying that's going to be collected and destroyed.

[00:05:25]Now, destroyed is an interesting word because I think in the minds of most people when they hear destroyed, they think, you know, blown up, incinerated, in some way turned into something else.

[00:05:36]I believe that's fairly hard to do with enriched uranium. There there may be some chemicals they could add that would at least make it more difficult to to reprocess it. uh you can down blend it is the most common way to destroy or basically take it from 60% enriched uranium to 3.6% where it would be used as nuclear fuel which is what Iran has already offered to do. So depending on what Trump actually means by destroyed maybe something could be worked on there maybe something couldn't. Uh I do think Iran would probably be willing to down blend it stockpile. This is because this is what the Iranians have publicly said.

[00:06:18]They're willing to down blend their stockpile of highlyenriched uranium back down to fuel grade and keep it there for a period of 5 to 10 years.

[00:06:28]And then they would probably be willing to do that under the watchful eye of the IAEA to verify that Iran isn't, you know, keeping a little bit enriched at 60% or doing something nefarious or towards the path of weaponization. That way, Israel and the Trump administration wouldn't have the propaganda to say that Iran isn't complying with the deal. So, uh, from that perspective, I think it actually benefits the Iranians to have the IAEA and maybe even the Chinese involved in the monitoring process. I know after operation midnight hammer, Iran was consume concerned that the IAEA was significantly compromised by Israel and the United States, which given the strikes on Iran's nuclear scientists, the assassinations of them, and of course the nuclear facilities may be the case. You know, that that may be a valid concern that the Iranians have. So Iran may be a part of that. Now, Trump is, I guess, still in the situation room as we're speaking now. I checked his true social, which is probably where he's going to announce whether there's a deal or not a deal. Uh, also Ed's just seeing if there's any reports and nothing to suggest that Donald Trump has made a decision on this matter. Now, I have a post here from Jobside News. They've of course been doing fantastic work and I think are probably the American media outlet most likely to accurately reflect uh the Iranian position and the Iranians are saying that the outline of the memorandum of understanding that Trump that we just wrote down his true social is missing some key aspects of what's actually been agreed upon. Uh the biggest one and as I've said time and time again, I think this is going to be the most complicated issue to enforce and the one most likely even if there is an agreement to ultimately end up scuttling it and lead us back down a path to war with Iran is Lebanon. Iran says that this ceasefire does apply to Lebanon. Trump left that out. And it's because if this ceasefire applies to Lebanon, by the way, the Iranians say it's on the Hezbollah conditions and Hezbollah's conditions have been not only does Israel stop bombing Lebanon, but they withdraw their forces from Lebanon. Israel is claiming the the south of that country. Uh everything south of Leatani River, it bisects, I would say, like the southern fourth of the country. If you look on a map, heavily Shia populated area. Israel wants it. They want the water resources from the Latani. They want the strategic, the natural barrier. And who knows, maybe in the long term they want more. But this is just kind of the piece of Lebanon that they could bite off right now. And so they declared an Israeli security zone. This memorandum of understanding is a major loss for the Israelis if what ends up being signed is by the Iranian side. uh which I'm guessing that it is because we have Iranian officials right now basically celebrating saying that this victory was won by the Iranians on the battlefield that the terms that they imposed that they said that they wanted it at the end of the uh at the end of the fighting in April is now what's being agreed upon uh in this memorandum of understanding.

[00:09:45]Now, I guess one important thing here is that this is aou and so it's not an actual fullon peace deal. The full-on peace deal is supposed to be negotiated over the next 60 days and in that there's supposed to be negotiation on Iran's nuclear program. Now, one really important aspect of Iran's nuclear program is Trump could almost gain some leverage back here right now for himself by saying that the Iranians don't have a nuclear weapons program and as long as Iran's nuclear enrichment uh program is in compliance with the non-prololiferation treaty uh which you know other governments like Japan, Brazil, Argentina, their nuclear enrichment programs are then we're all good on this issue. That way we we really don't have to negotiate on it. We fulfilled the Trump's demand that Iran isn't making a nuclear weapon. And Iran really the the point of them having uranium enriched at 60% isn't to make a nuclear weapon. They say that they don't want one. The point of that uranium was always to have something to negotiate and trade back to the Americans. And so if we tell the Iranians we don't care about their nuclear enrichment program so long as it remains a civilian nuclear enrichment program then that's not additional leverage that the Iranians have to trade away to the United States and we could condition sanctions relief on Iran at least minimizing tolls in the straight of Hormuz and maximizing the amount of traffic they're going to allow through uh that very crucial waterway.

[00:11:20]Now, Steven Miller, one of Trump's top advisors, is trying to spin the whole deal. So, he had this segment on Fox News with Jesse Waters, and I want to break it down.

[00:11:32]>> Deal or no deal?

[00:11:34]Well, as you said, President Trump is the one who's going to make that decision, and President Trump alone, he's directly personally involved in the negotiations, making sure that the results are up to his standards. As you've outlined, Iran has made significant material and dramatic concessions to the United States that would have been impossible only a short time ago because of the military battlefield defeat that they have suffered and the embargo continuing to choke the life out of their economy. But let's understand something very >> So what concessions has Iran made that they weren't willing to make before the war? By all evidence, Iran is actually less willing to make concessions now than they were before the war. Remember before in February taunts in Vienna, the Iranians come to the table with a proposal that the Omani mediators thought there was no way the Americans were going to reject. Even the British were shocked by the proposal and basically said the only reason the Americans didn't accept it is because Jared Kushner and Steve Wickoff didn't invite nuclear technical advisors to the tots didn't understand what the Iranians were putting forward. Misunderstood the deal and rejected it. But the Iranians said we won't enrich uranium for 5 years. 5 years they were putting it on the table. Now Iran is saying they're going to continue to enrich uranium.

[00:13:02]They're just willing to cap it at 3.6% fuel grade what they need to run the reactors for 10 years. Right? This isn't a bet that we didn't win in these negotiations. This war did not benefit the United States of America. The straight of Hormuse was you you know effectively treated as an international waterway before this. Ships went in and out. They weren't harassed. They weren't restricted. They weren't paying fees to the Omanis or the Iranians. And now they will have to going forward whenever the map is drawn it's going to be drawn the straight of Hormuz half of it controlled by Iran and half of it's controlled by Oman and that's because of this war. So no Iran has not made any concessions. I know the White House is going to try to spin this in order to claim that Trump got a great deal, a deal that no other president could have gotten, but clearly that's not the case. Uh let's hear what Mr. Miller has to say going forward >> to baseline this all on where we are today versus where we started. When Obama signed the Iran nuclear deal, the so-called JCPOA, Iran was on a guaranteed path to a nuclear weapon to being the dominant power in the region to being the richest and most militarily threatening nation in the entire Middle East with the ability to launch ballistic and ultimately nuclear weapons to Europe and eventually the United States. now because the president >> uh pause it there. This is just absolutely insane what he's saying here.

[00:14:29]First of all, the JCPOA is the joint comprehensive pranov action or the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Now, that deal did not put Iran on a path to a nuclear weapon. Iran was still a member of the non-prololiferation treaty as they were before. that what the JCPOA did is it imposed additional restrictions and additional inspections on Iran's nuclear program to ensure two things. One, that Iran could not secretly build a nuclear weapon. And two, if Iran did decide to build a nuclear weapon, it would be quickly exposed and it would take a year or more for Iran to build a nuclear weapon after it was exposed, giving the US and any other time uh country plenty of time to intervene and stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. And we're not going to have that now. It's also hilarious, absolutely hilarious that the Trump administration has to pretend that this all started in 2015 and not in February, right? Because again, in February, everybody knows, widely reported, a better deal was on the table. We fought a war. 13 Americans died. We used half of our key strategic missiles, our interceptors, our standoff munitions. We spent tens, if not hundreds of billions of dollars on this conflict. We alienated our alliances in the region. We did all of that and achieved absolutely nothing. That's why Miller's trying to go all the way back to 2015 to spin lies about the Iran nuclear deal. Let's keep going. Their economy has been dismantled. Their nuclear program under Operation Midnight Hammer has been obliterated. Their entire defense industrial base has been eradicated. Their navy's at the bottom of the sea. Their air force at the bottom of the sea. Their entire leadership class has been decapitated.

[00:16:24]It is the most complete, thorough, total military thrashing in the history of armed conflict. Four weeks and a country decimated to that degree, to that extent. And now here we are at the end of that with the ram putting on the table a complete reopening of the straight as has been discussed and many other concessions that are going to be unveiled in the time to come. But again, there's no deal until there's a deal.

[00:16:51]Nothing's final till it's final. And President Trump's been clear that he reserves the option now or at any time in the future to do whatever is necessary to defend and protect America's national security.

[00:17:05]>> So this is incredible. Him bragging about the entire Iranian political class having been killed. Okay. A lot of damage to the Iranians. Okay. Did you achieve a single strategic victory by doing so? Or were almost all those strategic defeats? If you remember back to January, the Iranian government was dealing with a massive protest movement.

[00:17:28]They had to kill thousands of their own citizens in order to quell that protest.

[00:17:33]Not not the 45,000 that Donald Trump claims, but even the Iranians say it was 6 to 8,000. So, it's probably at least a little bit higher than that. And sure, some of those people were, you know, revolutionaries and arsonists trying to kill innocents and bring down the government, but a lot of those people were also just people taking to the streets because they were upset with their government, right? The the economic situation in Iran was not good.

[00:17:58]The the political situation, the freedoms, that's not people were not happy with the Iranian government, a significant minority. And now they've rallied around the flag. Sure, the economy is currently hurting, but once the straight of Hormuz reopens, once Iran has access to its international assets, once it's able to export oil at a much higher prices without the burden of US sanctions, that economic pressure as well is going to be relieved. Sure, you again, you killed the political class, but you killed the political class of Iran that was seen as being weak abroad, right? They had gone tip fortat with the Americans in Operation Midnight Hammer uh with the Israelis a few times in the years before that and Ron came out on the other side. They pretended it was a victory but they achieved absolutely nothing. Here you have a whole new leadership class who stood up to the world empire stood down the Americans and the Israelis and scored a massive victory for the Iranians that's undeniable in capturing the straight of Hormuz. So, it seems to me in every measurable way the Iranian government won this war. We killed some civilians. We blew up a school. We caused a lot of damage. We killed, you know, we did awful things to the Iranian people, but did absolutely nothing to advance any of America's strategic goals and at the same time did actually advance several of Iran's. Now, another amazing thing that he says in there is, and I can't believe the White House hasn't figured out that this is a real messaging problem. One, Donald Trump is now saying that the only reason we went to war in Iran was to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. They also say that Iran's nuclear weapons program or nuclear program was completely destroyed and dismantled last June. So, how can you have it? How can you have scored this massive victory that set Iran's nuclear program back decades a year ago, but we are still fighting a war to address that issue now? I it makes absolutely no sense. This propaganda is absolutely atrocious. But it is important to break it down because he says it so confidently and with so much passion that the average Fox News viewer, I can't imagine what the average IQ is of the Jesse Water Show viewer, but I'm sure it's not very high. Uh, next up here we have Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett.

[00:20:23]>> Also at the cabinet meeting, President Trump said Oman will behave just like everybody else for we will have to blow them up. Are you guys back there in the West Wing making plans for a new war with Oman?

[00:20:35]>> Uh, again, I think the president wanted to punctuate freedom of navigation in the straight. I had a call with the Omani ambassador this morning and he assured me that there were no plans for tolling the straight. As he said, "Our countries have had 200 years of good relations. He wants to have another 200 more." And you know, I told him that this was a non-starter and he did not want to risk either the Omani individuals or Omani financial institutions the getting sanctioned.

[00:21:10]The reason this is significant is that Scott Besset doubling down on something that Donald Trump said yesterday to blow blow up the Omanis. If they go along with the Iranian plan to split the straight of form moves to charge fees as ships move through, I'm sure Oman will get maybe a small percentage or get some kind of benefits from working with the Iranians on this. but that this is a persistent issue that Scott Beth, it's not just Donald Trump maybe saying something crazy at a you you know long White House cabinet meeting. You know, he's heard all these reports. He's taking all these questions from reporters. Oman kind of sounds like Iran. It's all in the Middle East. Maybe he just, you know, that that could have been what happened. But Besset saying this, I think is significant that Washington must really be worried that Oman is actually going to do this, that they're issuing these threats. They wouldn't be threatening an ally if they didn't have to do so. Also, this is just a small note, could be nothing, but it does seem atypical for a US Treasury Secretary to have a call of this importance only with the Omani ambassador that he wasn't, you know, contacting in, you know, in conversation with the the leader of Oman, but at least his counterpart, but, you know, actually just talking to the ambassador seemed kind of interesting to me. I wonder if uh the Omani leadership is not at all happy with Donald Trump's statements and what impact that could have. You know, maybe as the US weaknesses has been shown and exposed with this memorandum of understanding, Oman is going to actually be far more likely to go along with the Iranian plan, uh seeing that the US security umbrella for the Middle East is really meaningless to every state that is in Israel. Uh next up here is Senator Lindsey Graham.

[00:23:02]this off. If he can get Saudi Arabia, the center of Islam, for the entire world, to recognize the Jewish state, Israel, he will have ended the Arab-Israeli conflict that's been going on for thousands of years. They should change the Nobel Prize to the Trump Prize. If he can do that, and I think he can, it's the biggest change in the history in the modern history and in the ancient history of the Middle East, where the Arabs and the Jews live together, where it becomes a a a center of power economically, not a powder keg.

[00:23:37]And once you put Iran in a box, and he's going to do that, we're going to have peace between Saudi Arabia and Israel.

[00:23:43]Nobody thought that was possible. I believe it's possible. And there's one guy can do it. Donald Trump.

[00:23:50]>> So, excuse me. Absolutely insanity here.

[00:23:55]First of all, there's not active war between Saudi Arabia and Israel. There's a lot of behind the scenes ties between those two governments. They are very willing to work together on interests that they're both aligned with, such as the situation in Yemen, right? And the Saudis, they don't care all that much about the Palestinians. they pretend to for their domestic population. That issue wouldn't go away even if Saudi Arabia signed the Abraham Accords. Now, we can't bring and play this clip without mentioning that Israel has existed since 1948. So, how has Saudi Arabia and the Muslim people been at war with Israel uh for the past a thousand years? Senator Graham, uh please explain that one to me. how you're ending a thousand-year-old state uh conflict with a state that's only existed for seven decades. Uh something seems a little bit out of line there now. The idea again of tying Saudi Arabia into the Abraham Accords isn't going to happen. The Saudis have said that they simply can't do it. that the Alsud family will be overthrown by the Saudi people if they try to sign a deal with the Israelis to officially publicly normalize ties without while Israel is actively committing a genocide against the Palestinian people. And we will have more on the situation in Gaza at the end of the show. But that is a really significant piece that uh piece to all this. And also even if Saudi Arabia did normalize ties with um with the Israelis, it's not as if the the Arab world or even the Mus Muslim world more generally exists as some kind of monolith where whatever Muhammad Ben Solomon says, if he says goes out in the streets and say we like the Israelis now, they're more likely to throw stones at him and kill him than they are to go along with what he says and say we all like Israel now. Right? The Turds had their separate issues. The Egyptians had their separate issues. Is this going to resolve the problems with Ansar Allah or Houthis or the the Palestinians or the Iranians? Absolutely not. This guy is still going to be calling for war in the Middle East even if he got his fantasy of Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords. Uh last article I wanted to bring up here. This is from the Substack uh cap um I think capital and empire and uh they have this article exclusive Israel privately pressuring US to kill Iran's lead negotiator and launch new strikes and they uh site a source or I guess a classified US intelligence report that has been circulating over the past week which says Israel is privately lobbying the department of war to assess assassinate Iran's lead negotiator uh parliamentary speaker Muhammad uh Bagir Jabath and restart the war with a new round of strikes targeting the country's oil infrastructure. Uh so you know they the Israelis are pressing Trump to go back to war. I'm not sure if the lobbying effort is going to work but again Donald Trump has to reign the Israelis in on Lebanon to end this war. And so even if this doesn't work in the short term and Trump agrees to the memorandum of understanding, Israel is still going to work to prolong this conflict. Uh next up here, speaking to Lebanon, is our ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabe.

[00:27:23]I wonder if everyone in Lebanon understands that if there were no Israel, they wouldn't have a cell phone.

[00:27:30]I wonder if they understand that every time they use a USB, every time they use car navigation, that every time they eat a cherry tomato or have a delicious bite of seedless watermelon, instead of saying, "I can't talk to those people," they should step across the border, shake the hands, and say, "Thank you.

[00:27:52]Thank you for helping create some things that have made my life better and easier."

[00:27:58]This is the one of the most disgusting things I have ever heard a a US official say. Right. Israel is actively bombing Lebanon, killing their children. Uh since March, 200 paramedics killed.

[00:28:14]Israel is intentionally targeting the ambulance that are going to the sites of their air strikes and then killing the rescue workers. I mean, it it's sick and demented beyond belief. They're smashing statues of Jesus. There's a lot of Christians in Lebanon. And the He's saying that the Lebanese people should look at this and they should go, "Thank you, Israel. You gave us the cherry tomato. My life is so much my my daughter's dead. My house is gone.

[00:28:42]You've kicked me out of my town. My community is destroyed. Our economy is in shambles. Our government is in shambles. Our country is at war. But I have this nice sweet cherry tomato. So, I'm just going to thank the Israelis. I mean, can you imagine a situation where, you know, you have the founder of some company, right, and he kills somebody's child and, you know, if it's like, say, for instance, Jeff Bezos, and you go to the police and the police officer says, "Well, you do like your two-day free shipping on Prime, don't you? Like, shouldn't you be kind of grateful about that?" Of course, everybody would absolutely want to punch and probably do worse things to the person who told you that. And what my cuckabe here is said here is just absolutely deplorable. And this this kind of rhetoric, these kinds of statements are going to be used against the United States of American America and Americans for years to come that we allowed our people in the highest ranks of our government to not only espouse positions and beliefs like this, but also effectively carry out this policy where we're could we're helping Israel to conduct an ethnic cleansing, an open ethnic cleansing, an open she seizure of Lebanese territory and we're saying this is good for Lebanon. The Lebanese people should be grateful for what we're doing to them. Uh really unbelievable.

[00:30:08]Uh a couple stories here on Gaza that I wanted to talk about. Uh this one from the Economist. The article is titled What I Did in Gaza and Israeli Soldiers Reckoning. And this soldier kind of just lays out the situation, the commands that they were given. He says, "As an infestry soldier, I learned the rules of engagement are the first and most basic thing I need to know. But in Gaza, unlike in the West Bank, we didn't get any rules of engagement. We did have red lines and sector boundaries, but the purpose was so we would not shoot other forces to prevent friendly fire. The world civilian was not mentioned." Now, this is really important, right? Because as we talk about war crimes investigations into Israel, we've had Israeli officials say there are no civilians in Gaza. Hell, we've had American officials elected members of the American Congress say there are no civilians in Gaza. But some people say, "Ah, that's rhetoric. October 7th had happened. People were worked up." But here you have an Israeli soldier actually saying that there were no civilians in Gaza. that they were given orders and those orders did not include anything to do with civilians effectively meaning there there were no civilians in Gaza. Now, how this policy plays out, the soldier gets into nets.

[00:31:35]Uh he explains uh that in Gaza all men of military age were deemed legitimate targets and military age is really open to interpretation. It could be from 16 to 60 or even younger. Most of the people that my unit killed were not armed. We had cases where my unit killed a lot of people and we did not check if they had uniforms or weapons. They often couldn't tell who they were fighting. Uh figures shuffling through the hub of hundreds of meters away and could be anyone. Someone on guard duty sees someone, shoots him, kills him, and now there's a dead person. We wouldn't know what his story was or what he did. and uh goes on to say that they set red lines in Gaza which were invisible boundaries and you know we had talked about this in the past effectively kill zone any civilian that wanders into a certain area even if there's no boundary any clear reason to think that you would be crossing the line you know you're just walking down your street one place to get to another you cross the line they shoot and they kill you and the soldier explains that they call these dog lines and the reason for this is truly repulsive. It's because they would shoot the people, kill them, snipe them in the head or heart, kill them, drop their body dead right there, and then the stray and wild dogs would come and eat the bodies. And that's the line would be so obvious because they would shoot people who tried to cross it that you would see where the dogs were picking over uh the the meat of the dead people. And I mean the the inhumanity involved in conducting an operation like that is it I I really don't have words for it. I don't have a whole lot to add to that comment uh the the soldiers comments there. Just that it's horrific that this is happening and people need to understand that the American government is backing and allowing this to happen.

[00:33:36]Also this article here from Herets's uh new story out UN Secretary General report accuses Israeli forces of rape sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees.

[00:33:49]Uh this is something that I've been covering uh written in my news articles for I guess three years now. Essentially throughout this entire genocide reports start to emerge f first from Palestinian sources. And of course, the Zionists would say, "Oh, you're just going to believe the Palestinians. They're all terrorists who hate the Israelis." And then the reports start to come from uh you know, even Israeli media sources, Israelis saying it. And now we have the UN. So, we have all these different outlets, uh, you know, ENRA, we have the Palestinian agencies, we have the Israeli media agencies, we have, uh, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the UN, all saying that it's clear as day that there is an intentional Israeli policy to rape and abuse the Palestinians that are held in detention. We know a lot of the people held in detention, as much as 80% are not militants. They're not suspected of being members of Hamas. They are effectively innocent Palestinians who are undergoing this severe brutalization. And of course, this is all a part of a genocide campaign, right? That you're trying to completely remove and eradicate the Palestinian people from territory that Israel claims. Fear, intimidation, dehumanization, uh just mass killing, mass rape. This is all a part of that program that Israel is carrying out right now. hand in hand with the Americans. All right, everybody. That's where I'm wrapping up the show today. Thank you all so much for tuning in. I saw the chat was very active, but since it was a solo, so I couldn't keep up. I will go back and look at the comments after the show. So, any feedback again, any suggestions for future guests, drop those in the comment section. Uh be sure you like and share out this episode, subscribe to the show, no matter where you're listening, whether that's video on YouTube or on your uh favorite podcaster. Thanks everyone.

[00:35:59]Heat up here.