Thomas Massie Just EXPOSED TPUSA’s Biggest Secret

Added: 2026-05-31

[00:00:03]quote, "A company run by former Trump campaign manager Brad Parcel, hired by the Israeli government to push pro-Israel views on a major conservative media network, has directed $13 million from Israel to several Republican digital strategy firms and allies, according to previously unreported document filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act." You don't say. Or maybe more accurately, it would be anti-Semitic to say. We've known it to be true for a long time, but finally it's been confirmed and exposed that the entire legacy conservative media ecosystem is just a bunch of pro-Israel firsters taking money from Israel. And I'm glad we had a small hand in exposing these traders. So, it all started a few days ago with this clip of the new Charlie Kirk show, claiming that Charlie, if he were alive today, would not support Thomas Massie, even though he said Thomas Massie was one of his favorite politicians because he voted against the big beautiful bill and expose the Epstein files. That's what these guys are claiming. Let's play it.

[00:01:06]>> I wanted to know a little bit more about the Thomas Massie uh loss and what what what's your what your thoughts on that?

[00:01:15]I got so many thoughts.

[00:01:16]>> Well, first before he goes into his many, many thoughts, like why do they even still bother to do the show? Like, who is that lady in the middle? Does she even do anything? Does she say anything?

[00:01:26]You got the great Mikey McCoy looking like he's I don't know, he's he's staring at a ghost or something like that. Kovit, Blake Nef, these two buffoons. Like, is this even the Charlie Kirk show anymore? Like, what's the point of this? Anyways, I digress.

[00:01:41]>> Uh, you know, it's interesting, David.

[00:01:43]I've been accused, I think the organization's been accused, Erica's been accused of betraying Charlie uh by not coming out and endorsing one way or the other and not being more involved in that race. Uh I will tell you, and I I haven't said this publicly, but the and I know this isn't necessarily a question, but it's an opportunity to address it, but you know, after the one big beautiful bill vote, um you know, and I want to respect Charlie's privacy as well. It's always the the tension in all of this. Oh, now you want to respect. Come on, guys.

[00:02:13]>> You know, there's private conversations.

[00:02:15]Charlie was a fan of Thomas Massie, especially historically. Liked him on war, liked him on bud being a budget hawk and spending, but he was pretty frustrated uh that Massie didn't vote on in the affirmative on the big beautiful bill because it was essentially the totality of President Trump's first year agenda wrapped into one bill. And um I will just say privately Charlie was really really frustrated. Yeah, I I think that's the right way to put it.

[00:02:41]And I think he would have become more frustrated over the events of the past nine months, which is we liked what Massie said. We liked his libert Well, I'm sorry. I just have to interject again because was Charlie frustrated because Thomas Massie voted against the big beautiful bill or was maybe Charlie frustrated by the bill itself because it basically went against every single promise that Trump made to the American people? He betrayed the entire base.

[00:03:11]Whether they like to admit it or not, that's what the bill did.

[00:03:14]>> Prying credentials. We liked him making the debt clock that ran on Massie just >> and there's so many things to like about him. But he has, especially over the past few months, he's become the number one, >> let's put it, Republican gadfly, Republican who gets in Trump's way, criticizes Trump, and not just on debt or the war, but also on Epstein saying where there's this pedophile class that Trump is allied to essentially. And >> now they're claiming on the show that there's no such thing as pedophiles.

[00:03:45]Okay, this is this is how far down we've gone with this program right here. M I think Charlie would have been as you said very frustrated. He would have and Charlie was not a guy who would feud publicly. He would have certainly been messaging Massie about that and being like, "What's going on here?" And he would have he would have been very concerned with it. You don't know exactly what he'd say.

[00:04:05]>> Yeah. I don't know either.

[00:04:06]>> Us being honest about it.

[00:04:07]>> Yeah. But I I will tell you that I had some very candid conversations after the big beautiful bill that where he voiced his frustration to me privately.

[00:04:14]>> I'm sorry I made you guys watch that. As you could tell, I could hardly get through it myself. But this idea, you know, I have to say it. This idea that Massie was targeted by Trump because he didn't support the Big Beautiful Bill is just a straightup lie. It's a fabrication because guess what? MTG, Marjorie Taylor Green, she voted for the Big Beautiful Bill and it was still called a traitor. Why? Because both her and Massie, they had the audacity to do something which was to expose the Epstein files and his ties to our masters, our grandmasters over there in the state of Israel. That's the truth.

[00:04:54]And to say that Charlie wouldn't have wanted to expose or wouldn't have supported exposing pedophiles is treasonous. So anyways, I replied, "FYI, this show is now being run by a registered foreign agent of Israel."

[00:05:07]Seriously, look it up. I'm not joking.

[00:05:10]And this is something that we exposed here on the channel weeks ago. A company called Salem Media run by Brad Parcale.

[00:05:17]This is the video right here. The shocking evidence I just discovered about Charlie Kirk's murder. And what I'm referring to there was the very suspicious timing of the FAR registration, which was filed just 2 days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. And here it is right here, September 8th, 2025. And then two days later, he was gone. no longer a roadblock, so to speak. So anyway, Thomas Massie then enters the chat at Grock. Is it true that Charlie Kirk or the Charlie Kirk show is now distributed by a registered foreign agent of Israel?

[00:05:52]And for some reason, Grock would not answer the question. So Massie follows up, "Sorry Grock, I can't find your answer in the replies. What's the connection between Israel and the syndicator of the Charlie Kirk show?"

[00:06:02]Oddly to this day, Grock never replied to Thomas Massiey's question. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that our AI overlords didn't want to respond to that question. And I do think it was Thomas Massie who was the one behind the keyboard typing those questions to Grock because when we spoke to him, we did ask him like, "Who's actually the sassy one online? Is it your social media team? Is it you?" And he was like, "Trust me, if my social media team did or said a lot of things I've said online, they would probably be fired." Laura Loomer immediately of course accused Massie of being uh of having Israel derangement syndrome and funny enough subsequently gets community noted as she often does.

[00:06:45]And then the TPUSA boys entered the chat. Blake Nef says that's news to me.

[00:06:51]Oh Blake Blake come on play dumb. I hate it when people play dumb. Andrew Kulovit then chimes in saying the answer to your question Thomas is no. The Charlie Kirk show, which I started with Charlie in 2019, is distributed on RAV, not Salem.

[00:07:07]I've been here for the entire journey.

[00:07:09]Booked all the guests, including you twice, developed all the editorial. We followed Bannon's war room. I actually loved your stances on war, Maha, and the debt. To make any of this about Israel is not only wrong, it's telling. What a snake of a response. Not only because he gaslights, saying, "Oh, Massie, I love your stances on war. Maha the debt three pillars by the way that Trump has now abandoned right we're in an allout ill-advised war with Iran Trump has endorsed big chemical he's for these pesticides is being sprayed on all of our food and is also increasing the debt very rapidly but also Andrew Kovit leaves out some pretty critical details about the show's relationship with Salem media which of course he's immediately called out on in the comments because the Charlie Kirk show is literally listed on the Salem Media podcast website. And Andrew responds to this by saying, "No, the show was with Salem Media in 2020, but that ended January of this year. They do not distribute the show. They can still sell ads to the show, but it's no longer exclusive. RIV is our distribution partner. Even if we were distributed by Salem, they still never told us what to say." Oh, so you're affiliated with them but just not exclusively. And I have to say this editorial freedom BS, let me tell you from somebody in this industry, if you take money from whoever, you're bound by their editorial rules, whether they explicitly tell you or not. Fact is, the Charlie Kirk show is still distributed as a podcast on the Salem Media Network, and they still have a very close relationship financially and personally.

[00:08:51]So, calling it not Salem, I think is a bit of an obuscation and we can all see through it. Somebody else in the comments, why did you guys remove Charlie's older episodes off major streaming platforms? Andrew Culver responds, we didn't. Immediate community note, old podcast episodes of the Charlie Kirk show are no longer uh available on Spotify or Apple Podcast beyond recent months. They are available on Rumble and the Turning Point USA website. It's almost like they don't want us to be able to very easily have access to and verify what Charlie's position was on certain issues so they can spin it however they want. Charlie was for this, Charlie was for that. And then those episodes, if you try to go back and find them, very difficult to do so. And today it was further exposed by The Intercept that the pro-Israel money has basically infiltrated the entire conservative podcast ecosystem. Quote, "A company run by former Trump campaign manager Brad Parcale, hired by the Israeli government to push pro-Israel views on a major conservative media network, has directed 13 million from Israel to several Republican digital strategy firms and allies, according to previously unreported document filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act." You don't say. Or maybe more accurately, it would be anti-Semitic to say. Continuing, the document shows that Parcale directed over $500,000 for ads to Salem Media Representatives, a subsidiary of Salem Media, although Parcale was hired to integrate pro-Israel messaging into Salem media shows, which featured conservative commentators such as Hugh Hewitt, Larry Elder, and Scott Jennings. People have on occasion, shall we say, accused me of being hyperfocused on Israeli influence in American politics and not paying close enough attention to Chinese influence or Qatari influence or Saudi influence or influence from any other country. But the reality is if this were any other country, people would be freaking out. We would never allow it to happen. I mean, imagine if the Chinese own CBS News, which by the way, CBS News, as a fact, is now basically run as an Israeli affiliated outlet by Barry Weiss. This right here may be the most important takeaway. Okay, it says, "Parscale's work is part of a broader strategy by the Israeli government to win back support from young conservatives and evangelicals. TPUSA is basically the modern-day moon cult. I produced a entire documentary about this which I'll link below. But Christian nationalism is actually just a giant scop that has nothing to do with Christianity and everything to do with the greater Israel project. Genesis 12:3, I will bless those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel.

[00:11:40]This is what they are trying to instill in every single Christian. And that is why Charlie had to go because he was at the heart of this debate about whether we can use or we should use religion to justify foreign policy decisions. And also he was very much for things like small government, individual liberty, non-interventionism, open debate, which are all ideas completely antithetical to modern Zionism. That is it for me this week. I think this truly is the fight for the soul of this nation. and whether or not we will be sovereign again and to what lengths will we go to fight these evil forces. So, I definitely want to hear from you in the comments section below. And also, if you want to support my journalism, you can go to my website 5149jameslee.com, sign up to become a member. Also, there's an option to give a onetime donation. No subscription necessary. You can also buy some merch. That is how we keep independent media actually free.

[00:12:40]But if not, no worries at all. My mission is always to never gatekeep information. So, if you could just do me one big favor and hype this video, give it a thumbs up, share it, subscribe to the channel, turn on that notification bell so you can be the first to know when my next video drops. As always, thank you so much for your time and I will see you in the next one. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying, again, it's all over the place, right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be? And how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing?