Trump’s BIG Announcement | Iran’s NEW Status | Israel’s TRAGIC Future

本站添加: 2026-05-25

[00:00:00]An agreement with Iran is largely negotiated. According to the American president, there is a lot of worry and fear in Israel. Calls between the American president and multiple Arab and Muslim leaders about an agreement with Iran following visits that came from both Katar and Pakistan to the Iranian capital. So, is there an agreement? And if so, what would it look like? And what would it mean to the future of the region and the future of the world and the relationship between the United States and Iran? Let's begin with the recent statement that came from the American president about the fact that the agreement with Iran is largely negotiated and includes the opening of the Strait of Hormuz.

[00:00:49]American President Donald Trump said on Saturday a deal with Iran had been largely negotiated with a proposal including opening the crucial straight of though the agreement was subject to finalization. An agreement has been largely negotiated subject to finalization between the United States of America, Iran and the various other countries. Trump wrote on his truth social platform listing a number of Middle East powers along with Turkey and mediator Pakistan in addition to many other elements of the agreement. The strait of Hurmos will be open. Now he spoke with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain. He also added that he spoke with the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and likewise the conversation went very well. Final aspects and details of the deal are currently being discussed and will be announced shortly. Now we're talking about a certain framework that has been finalized and being finalized a 14point framework that's following the 10-point framework that Iran proposed to the United States to enter uh talks between them and the American side. They didn't say what this would include. And according to certain statements, this would include Iran not having nuclear bombs, Iran having management over the straight of Hormuz, Iran having everything to do with its defense capabilities and army, everything to do with their strategic partnerships with resistance movements in the region. in effect just a promise that the Iranians wouldn't have nuclear missiles or nuclear weapons. So, is that different from the JCPOA?

[00:02:43]Yes, it is. And it's more in the favor of Iran now because we're talking about a new reality. Iran will have tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. the United States will have no say in anything to do with Iran's strategic capabilities. Contrary to what the United States was saying about Iran and one of the main reasons to go into a war, the United States used to say several times that they they wanted to take down the whole army, their missile capabilities, everything to do with their defense capabilities.

[00:03:18]Now, why is it better for Iran and why is Israel worried? It's because these are the things that Israel was asking for. That's why in Israel they're reporting of concerns, saying while signs indicate that the negotiations are moving toward agreements, Israel fears a wording that will not guarantee nuclear disarmament, limit missiles, or curb proxies. And according to the reports, none of that will be included.

[00:03:47]Concerns about conduct of another US president who will be less sympathetic to Israel are also looming. The Israelis know where the wind is blowing. We've been speaking about this where the wind is blowing with the American people and the global population now they're departing from Israel. They also said that the demands of the parties the goals if fighting resumes and the capabilities that Iran has left in that regard. They're saying that if a war resumes, we're going to attack their energy infrastructure. something that they've said many times.

[00:04:24]But why are they worried? They're worried because Iran's going to still have anything everything to do with threatening Israel. What's worrying Israel more, however, is a less sympathetic president. That will mean less support potentially for Israel.

[00:04:41]How? Well, let's say the United States has an agreement with Iran. Israel is excluded from this agreement. And let's say Israel decided to have an attack against Iran. An agreement that would curb the capability or the ability altogether of the United States to attack Iran and let Israel go into a war might lead the United States to limit the number of weapons and missiles and military support that they sent to the Israeli side.

[00:05:10]What would that be like? Well, it would be like Israel being completely stripped off every single power that it has that comes from the United States of America, apart from the things that they don't rely on to receive constantly.

[00:05:31]Israel already depleted the defense missiles of the United States during this war of aggression against Iran.

[00:05:40]Anyone with uh reason in the United States would realize that this is taking its toll on the United States and putting the United States in a vulnerable position and strategically that's very dangerous assuming that the United States has more adventures. Now, we didn't just stop there. One of Netanyahu's closest aids said the following about Donald Trump. He's no longer the lion in the jungle. America has fallen.

[00:06:11]Trump is getting closer to a deal with Iran, according to recent reports, and criticism already began began to come from Israel for what is perceived as a capitulation to the Iranians.

[00:06:22]Netanyahu's close aid sharply attacks the American president. That was Natan Eel, one of Benjamin Netanyahu's closest aids who spoke about this in length criticizing the United States and its position with talking to Iran. According to them in Israel, they're saying that talking to Iran is a loss if you're just simply talking with them. And uh now they're just in essence surrendering to Iran, which is what Iran was in essence asking for. They literally said that.

[00:07:00]Trump dared to say it to the Iranians before. Now Iran told them, you surrender. And if Iran is emerging out of this with its missiles intact, with its army intact, with its economy in a better position, with more control over the straight of with a strategic weight that is unmatched in the region of West Asia from any country for a very very long time. That means Iran is in a much more powerful position and the United States is in a weaker position.

[00:07:39]Now, the potential of a deal between the United States and Iran is worrying people not only in Israel but in the United States. And you may wonder, well, if Israel isn't going to have the best results out of the talks, and it's the United States, which makes sense. You know, countries talk because they want to get their own interests firstly, but some people in the United States are working well, not entirely for the sake of the United States, and one of them is Lindsey Graham.

[00:08:17]It's a nightmare for Israel according to him because that's not going to have anything to do with the danger that Iran poses.

[00:08:29]He said that if a deal is struck to end the Iranian conflict because it is believed that the strait of Hormuz cannot be protected from Iranian terrorism and Iran still possess the capability to destroy major Gulf oil infrastructure then Iran will be perceived as being a dominant force requiring a diplomatic solution.

[00:08:52]in essence being concerned about Israel first and foremost and secondly being concerned about a diplomatic solution.

[00:09:04]Why are they so concerned about a diplomatic solution? People don't want wars in general.

[00:09:11]The governments and powers, they work their media arms 24/7 to try and convince people that war is good and occupation is good and supremacy is good.

[00:09:24]People don't want wars.

[00:09:27]But these Zionist elements in the United States and anyone in that sphere are trying to convince us that that is the way forward and any political and diplomatic solution causes a lot of problems for them. And fact of the matter is they are still in power.

[00:09:49]They're still in the administration.

[00:09:50]They're very close to Donald Trump. But that's why Donald Trump was saying that there are people who want me to stop and people who don't want me to stop.

[00:09:58]So all of the talk needs to be put in its context. At the end of the day, there are reasons to believe that there may be a solution. On the other hand, there are reasons to believe that uh the pressure might still be on and the United States might go at the end of the day for an attack for the sake of Netanyahu because they deceived the Iranian uh side before and they attacked with Israel and the second attack was bigger. Now they're talking about the final draft and according to Saudi media that was circulating in other networks too and Israel spoke about this as well. A final deal draft has been published. What does it say? It speaks about an immediate comprehensive unconditional ceasefire on all fronts including land, sea, and air. Mutual commitment not to target military, civilian or economic infrastructure. an end to military operations and halt to the media war. Commitments to respect sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-inference in internal affairs, guaranteed freedom of navigation in the Arabian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Gulf of Oman. a joint mechanism to monitor implementation and resolve disputes. Negotiations on outstanding issues to begin within seven days, the gradual lifting of US sanctions in exchange for Iran's commitment to terms of the agreement. Reaffirmed compliance with the international law and UN charter. Now, if you notice, all of these things are against what Israel wants from the United States to force Iran to do.

[00:11:46]Netanyahu wanted something in the favor of Israel, not the United States. And this will, in essence, if implemented, limit Israel's capability to uh have any part of such an agreement. As a matter of fact, Netanyahu himself might declare that this agreement is non-binding or Israel.

[00:12:08]That would be the biggest problem that the United States would face because well, are they or are they not included?

[00:12:15]Chances are they're not included and chances are they're not aware of what's happening in the negotiations. Just hearing about them after they're being declared, the only knowledge that they have in terms of the agreement itself is what comes to them directly from people speaking. so long as they have that access because not everyone has access to that information and we're not talking about the early phases of the deal like when JD Vance and Steve Whit were talking. These are not the primary elements and the American president is heavily involved. As a matter of fact, there were leaks from Iran saying that he has a much different approach in the negotiations than he does on social media and with these posts. So if all of that is going to happen, does that mean that Iran would also not have a problem with American military presence in the region when they previously spoke about not wanting the United States to have any sort of presence? That could be uh the situation that hasn't been confirmed yet, which is well either the United States wouldn't have military presence or aggressive military presence uh or Iran. That's one of the things that they might have leniency on and tell them, do you know what? Okay, so long as you have, I don't know, 10 years or whatever, we can have an agreement. But nothing has been published so far.

[00:14:03]That's coming following a lot of pressure from Gulf States for uh a deal to happen between the United States of Iran. This pressure was h happening h for the past couple of days and that's why they're speaking about this. Now according to multiple reports, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, everyone called the United States president told him take the deal with Iran because we can no longer tolerate all of that looming threat. And that's why he is going ahead with uh these statements also because of how much they lost with their uh missiles.

[00:14:54]US depleted nearly half of Pentagon's missile defense interceptor stock defending Israel during Iran war.

[00:15:01]Imagine a country the size of the United States doing all of that for the sake of a country. one country.

[00:15:14]What about the other threats that the United States faces? I mean, United States is the threat by the way. So, usually they are the threat to the whole world. But of course, being a threat brings you other threats because you're constantly having wars and aggression against other countries.

[00:15:32]Yet, half of the stock is for the sake of Israel.

[00:15:38]saying all of that, the prospect of a war happening is still there. Donald Trump recently skipped his son's wedding amid reported uh strike preparations again simultaneously with all of the talks about this deal happening potentially between the United States and Iran or in initial understanding as well. Marco Rubio had certain statements in that regard. Donald Trump had multiple posts as well on social media to do with Iran and uh the threat against Iran. He published uh this map on social media, the United States of the Middle East, Iran with the US flag.

[00:16:29]And again, you know, that's part of the propaganda at the end of the day for the United States cuz Iran replied to him with this map as well. You know, maybe this is the map that's going to happen.

[00:16:43]Iran will be in America and the United States. These are posts at the end of look, we're used to Donald Trump having these post. How much of it is substantial? How much is not? Well, he had so many ultimatums and threats and he initially took a step back. Clearly, there's a certain limit to where the United States wants to go. However, the irrational wararmongering elements that have a very big impact on the American President Donald Trump are undeniably still there and undeniably applying pressure.

[00:17:19]How much of that will affect the decision making with the administration?

[00:17:25]The United States now has to weigh in it. They need to weigh in the prospects and the things that they can gain out of an additional strike against Iran and weigh in having a deal with Iran. Now, so far the price of that deal has increased.

[00:17:48]If the United States realizes that the prices increased when they had a better deal before, don't forget when they had a good deal on the table before the war of aggression and despite previous acts of terror from the United States against Iran attacking Iran, they had a good deal that could have potentially included American investment in Iran, even with American companies benefiting.

[00:18:11]But they did what they did for the sake of Israel and they didn't reach the conclusions that they wanted and the results. The Iranian price became higher and they had a response that was shocking and unexpected according to the president himself, American President Donald Trump. If the price increased to then and they have another attack, this is the second consideration then from an American perspective the Iranian price could get even higher.

[00:18:43]So if they had the straight of the Red Sea and they will fully support complete blocking of the Red Sea which will increase the trouble for the United States and its allies.

[00:18:59]Now, if Donald Trump's aim is to keep the empire alive rather than slowly lay it to rest, as in not uh eliminate it, because the United States, even if they withdraw from the whole world, they'll still be powerful, a powerful country.

[00:19:22]But if he still wants to keep the status of the United States with somewhat of an influence, he would be putting a very big and risky bet should he attack Iran. Whether it's for the sake of Israel, for the sake of the United States or for the sake of the two combined because we need to talk about what's behind Israel too. Same powers, finances, money, influence.

[00:19:49]So a deal in this case would be better for him technically and better for the vision of the United States that he wants regardless of the American population because even if the Americans don't want a war that's not the American president's consideration at all.

[00:20:10]That however would leave Israel in a weaker position, in a more isolated position, in a much more dangerous position because if an agreement is reached between the American side and the Iranian side, Israel will most likely be excluded, especially seeing as Iran does not recognize Israel at all and Israel achieved none of its objectives against Iran, let alone that there might be a more hostile or less friendly American president coming after Trump. Seeing as the sentiment and the general vibe and feeling amongst the American population is largely against Israel, that would leave the battlefield open between Israel and Iran. And without any American participation to support Israel in such a battle, Iran would be easily capable of wiping Israel off the map. Right now, misinformation spreads faster than facts, especially on the most sensitive global stories. NVP uses uncensored AI analysis to verify the most controversial topics and separate signal from propaganda in real time. Instead of guessing who to trust, you can see structured verification and analysis behind every major issue.