Starmer WALKS OUT of Commons as MP gives EVIDENCE of him LYING!

Hinzugefügt: 2026-06-02

[00:00:00]This was another incredibly awkward moment for Keir Starmer's government in the House of Commons because what started as a routine exchange quickly turned into members of Parliament openly challenging the Prime Minister's honesty on the record. First, a member of Parliament directly accused Starmer of misleading the House over claims about Labour's past humble addresses and national security.

[00:00:24]The point being made here was simple.

[00:00:26]Starmer had claimed Labour repeatedly referenced national security in opposition motions, but when members of Parliament actually checked the record, those words apparently didn't even appear.

[00:00:39]And the frustration only grew because Starmer had already left the chamber before being challenged on it.

[00:00:46]And things got even more uncomfortable.

[00:00:49]A second member of Parliament raised Starmer's past legal links to Phil Shiner, the disgraced lawyer involved in the Iraq abuse allegation scandal, and openly referenced court documents in the Commons that allegedly named K Star QC as acting in one of the cases.

[00:01:07]Again, the accusation here was essentially that Starmer's earlier answer to the House did not line up with documented legal records.

[00:01:16]Now, to be clear, the speaker tried to shut the exchanges down before it turned into a full-blown argument across the chamber, but the damage was already done because both accusations had now been formally put on the parliamentary record.

[00:01:33]And honestly, this is becoming a recurring issue for Labour.

[00:01:38]More and more members of Parliament are willing to directly challenge Starmer in public, not just on policy failures, but on credibility itself.

[00:01:49]Anyway, I'll let you watch the exchange because it was a pretty brutal moment in the Commons. But first, hit the like button and subscribe to the channel for more. I will leave it there. On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. On a point of order. Thank you ever so much, Mr. Speaker. The Prime Minister said that in each humble address that his party laid in opposition, they mentioned national security.

[00:02:08]Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has left. However, I have checked the two most recent humble addresses laid by the Labour Party when they were in opposition, and all members on those benches would be very aware the words national security do not feature even once.

[00:02:20]BECAUSE IT IS NOT necessary in a humble address.

[00:02:24]So, Mr. Speaker, how do we get the Prime Minister to correct the record when he's just chosen to leave the room?

[00:02:29]It would be ridiculous.

[00:02:31]Can I just say to you, you put it on the record, this I don't want to continue the debate, but you put it on the record, so is that right? On a point of order, Mr. Speaker.

[00:02:39]Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Now, the Prime Minister response to me just now appeared to deny ever being instructed by disgraced lawyer Phil Shiner. Yet, I have here the 2007 case of Al Jedda versus the Secretary of State for Defense, where it quite clearly says appellants instructed by public interest lawyers, include one Keir Starmer QC. Perhaps the Prime Minister might want to return to the House and clarify his earlier remarks.

[00:03:04]I'm not here to continue a debate. You put it on the record, we will leave it at that. Right.

[00:03:11]What makes this politically damaging for Starmer is not just the substance of the accusations.

[00:03:17]It's the optics.

[00:03:19]The Prime Minister leaves the chamber.

[00:03:21]Members of Parliament immediately stand up questioning the accuracy of what he's just said. Court documents are being waved around in Parliament, and the speaker is forced to calm things down before it escalates further.

[00:03:34]That is not a government projecting confidence or authority, and you can already feel the frustration growing inside Westminster itself.

[00:03:44]Labour came into office promising professionalism, transparency, and competence. But increasingly, the government just looks defensive, rattled, and constantly caught reacting to controversy after controversy.

[00:03:59]Because once members of parliament start openly questioning whether the prime minister is telling the truth to the House of Commons, that becomes a far bigger problem than just another bad headline.